[sane-devel] Plustek OpticFilm 7200 : first investigations
I have a plustek scanner. I have just given Windows XP the boot and installed Ubuntu. I love it, but now my Plustec 7200 is not supported. I found this info on the disk supplied. ; DeviceId=USB ID,[USB ID],.. ; PortIF = Hardware Port I/F ; 1: INSTEPP ; 2: INSTUSB ; ButtonOrder = Hardware Button Order ; 1: Album-Copy-Mail-Web Button Id = 5,6,4,3 ; 2: Album-Fax-Copy-Mail Button Id = 5,6,4,3 ; 3: PC_Fax-Mail-Scan-PC_Copy Button Id = 5,6,4,3default ; 4: MGI-Mail-Scan-PC_Fax-PC_Copy Button Id = 4,3,2,6,5 ; 5: copy-Ocr-Custom-Mail-Power Save Button Id = 4,3,2,6,5 ; 6: copy-Mail-Album-WEB-OCR Button Id = 4,3,2,6,5 ; 7: custom Button Id = ; 8: copy-OCR-Mail-Custom-ScanButton Id = 6,5,3,4,2 ; 9: copy-OCR-PowerSve-Mail-CustomButton Id = 1,2,3,4,5 ; ; AsicID = Main DSP ASIC ID ; #define ASIC_P98003 98003 ; #define ASIC_P99002 99002 ; #define ASIC_PO9831 983x ; Bit0:Button ; Bit1:TPA ; Bit2:1=9832,0=9831 ; Bit3:ADF ; #define ASIC_PO6801 6801 ; HWGuide = ; A3 Guide ; Slim Guide ; AutoCrop = ; 0: No ; 1: Yes ; 2: Invalid ;OEMName= for guide used ; NB ScanTrack ; Plustek ; FounderScan ; Legend ; Obm ;FolderName =for TARGETDIR FOLDER ICON [DefaultProductCode] ;UPDATE_ADDRESS=http://home.kimo.com.tw/linfrankkimo/update/scanner.vbs OEMName= TitleName=Plustek OpticFilm 7200 Setup CaptionName= ;SetupBmp???w???e,?]?w?? .BMP SetupBmp=Ms.bmp ;X ?b???k(???I)?_?V?I?? SetupBmpnx=0 ;Y ?b???U(???I)?_?V?W???I?? SetupBmpny=30 ;Y ???J , N ???~?W?? MultiProduct=N CD_Version=3.0.0 [SelectProduct] ;???h 9?? for OEM Item0=A11 [A11] ;Film Scanner Model= OpticFilm 7200 DeviceId=USB\VID_07B3PID_0807 PortIF = 2 AsicID = GL842 HWGuide = Slim Guide AutoCrop=1 ButtonOrder = 0 FolderName = Plustek OpticFilm 7200 TPA = 1 ADF=0 I did notice the bit about the AsicID which is GL842. I was wondering if anybody got this scanner working on Linux. Do you know anything about this. Oh yeah, I found your email on a discussion about this scanner. I hope you do not mind my enquiry. Matthew Ridgeway. PO Box 3 Pakenham Victoria Australia 3810
[sane-devel] Plustek OpticFilm 7200 : first investigations
On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 00:20 +1000, Matthew wrote: I have a plustek scanner. I have just given Windows XP the boot and installed Ubuntu. I love it, but now my Plustec 7200 is not supported. I found this info on the disk supplied. ; DeviceId=USB ID,[USB ID],.. ; PortIF = Hardware Port I/F ; 1: INSTEPP ; 2: INSTUSB ; ButtonOrder = Hardware Button Order ; 1: Album-Copy-Mail-Web Button Id = 5,6,4,3 ; 2: Album-Fax-Copy-Mail Button Id = 5,6,4,3 ; 3: PC_Fax-Mail-Scan-PC_Copy Button Id = 5,6,4,3default ; 4: MGI-Mail-Scan-PC_Fax-PC_Copy Button Id = 4,3,2,6,5 ; 5: copy-Ocr-Custom-Mail-Power Save Button Id = 4,3,2,6,5 ; 6: copy-Mail-Album-WEB-OCR Button Id = 4,3,2,6,5 ; 7: custom Button Id = ; 8: copy-OCR-Mail-Custom-ScanButton Id = 6,5,3,4,2 ; 9: copy-OCR-PowerSve-Mail-CustomButton Id = 1,2,3,4,5 ; ; AsicID = Main DSP ASIC ID ; #define ASIC_P98003 98003 ; #define ASIC_P99002 99002 ; #define ASIC_PO9831 983x ; Bit0:Button ; Bit1:TPA ; Bit2:1=9832,0=9831 ; Bit3:ADF ; #define ASIC_PO6801 6801 ; HWGuide = ; A3 Guide ; Slim Guide ; AutoCrop = ; 0: No ; 1: Yes ; 2: Invalid ;OEMName= for guide used ; NB ScanTrack ; Plustek ; FounderScan ; Legend ; Obm ;FolderName =for TARGETDIR FOLDER ICON [DefaultProductCode] ;UPDATE_ADDRESS=http://home.kimo.com.tw/linfrankkimo/update/scanner.vbs OEMName= TitleName=Plustek OpticFilm 7200 Setup CaptionName= ;SetupBmp???w???e,?]?w?? .BMP SetupBmp=Ms.bmp ;X ?b???k(???I)?_?V?I?? SetupBmpnx=0 ;Y ?b???U(???I)?_?V?W???I?? SetupBmpny=30 ;Y ???J , N ???~?W?? MultiProduct=N CD_Version=3.0.0 [SelectProduct] ;???h 9?? for OEM Item0=A11 [A11] ;Film Scanner Model= OpticFilm 7200 DeviceId=USB\VID_07B3PID_0807 PortIF = 2 AsicID = GL842 HWGuide = Slim Guide AutoCrop=1 ButtonOrder = 0 FolderName = Plustek OpticFilm 7200 TPA = 1 ADF=0 I did notice the bit about the AsicID which is GL842. I was wondering if anybody got this scanner working on Linux. Do you know anything about this. Oh yeah, I found your email on a discussion about this scanner. I hope you do not mind my enquiry. Matthew Ridgeway. PO Box 3 Pakenham Victoria Australia 3810 See this page http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/plustek-opticfilm-7200.html Maybe in future this scanner will be supported by the genesys backend when somebody adds support for it. -- m.vr.gr. Gerard Klaver
[sane-devel] Plustek OpticFilm 7200 : first investigations
Hi all ! About the OpticFilm 7200 (see my previous message), I have some more info... First, let me just paste the related content of my /proc/bus/usb/devices : /proc/bus/usb/devices-- T: Bus=04 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=02 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=480 MxCh= 0 D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1 P: Vendor=07b3 ProdID=0807 Rev= 3.06 S: Manufacturer=PLUSTEK INC S: Product=USB2.0 SCANNER S: SerialNumber=1 C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr= 10mA I: If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 3 Cls=ff(vend.) Sub=ff Prot=ff Driver=(none) E: Ad=81(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms E: Ad=02(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS= 512 Ivl=0ms E: Ad=83(I) Atr=03(Int.) MxPS= 1 Ivl=16ms -- Apart from the speed value of 480, the MaxPacketSize of 512 and the interval of 16ms in the last of the above lines, this is very much the same as on the webpage at http://www.sane-project.org/unsupported/plustek-opticfilm-7200.html Let's continue with the result of a sane-find-scanner -v -v : ---sane-find-scanner -v -v-- This is sane-find-scanner from sane-backends 1.0.17 trying libusb: device descriptor of 0x07b3/0x0807 at 004:002 bLength 18 bDescriptorType 1 bcdUSB2.00 bDeviceClass 255 bDeviceSubClass 255 bDeviceProtocol 255 bMaxPacketSize0 64 idVendor 0x07B3 idProduct 0x0807 bcdDevice 3.06 iManufacturer 10 ((null)) iProduct 11 ((null)) iSerialNumber 12 ((null)) bNumConfigurations1 configuration 0 bLength 9 bDescriptorType 2 wTotalLength 39 bNumInterfaces 1 bConfigurationValue 1 iConfiguration 0 () bmAttributes 192 (Self-powered) MaxPower 10 mA interface 0 altsetting 0 bLength9 bDescriptorType4 bInterfaceNumber 0 bAlternateSetting 0 bNumEndpoints 3 bInterfaceClass255 bInterfaceSubClass 255 bInterfaceProtocol 255 iInterface 0 () endpoint 0 bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x81 (in 0x01) bmAttributes 2 (bulk) wMaxPacketSize512 bInterval 0 ms bRefresh 0 bSynchAddress 0 endpoint 1 bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x02 (out 0x02) bmAttributes 2 (bulk) wMaxPacketSize512 bInterval 0 ms bRefresh 0 bSynchAddress 0 endpoint 2 bLength 7 bDescriptorType 5 bEndpointAddress 0x83 (in 0x03) bmAttributes 3 (interrupt) wMaxPacketSize1 bInterval 8 ms bRefresh 0 bSynchAddress 0 trying to find out which USB chip is used checking for GT-6801 ... this is not a GT-6801 (bcdUSB = 0x200) checking for GT-6816 ... this is not a GT-6816 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255) checking for GT-8911 ... this is not a GT-8911 (check 1, bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255) checking for MA-1017 ... this is not a MA-1017 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255) checking for MA-1015 ... this is not a MA-1015 (bcdUSB = 0x200) checking for MA-1509 ... this is not a MA-1509 (bcdUSB = 0x200) checking for LM983[1,2,3] ... this is not a LM983x (bcdUSB = 0x200) checking for GL646 ... this is not a GL646 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255) checking for GL646_HP ... this is not a GL646_HP (bcdUSB = 0x200) checking for GL660+GL646 ... this is not a GL660+GL646 (bDeviceClass = 255, bInterfaceClass = 255) checking for GL841 ... Couldn't set configuration: could not set config 1: Operation not permitted This USB chip looks like a GL841? found USB scanner (vendor=0x07b3, product=0x0807, chip=GL841?) at libusb:004:002 --- Okay, I don't like the question mark after the name of the chip. On the sane-project webpage listing the unsupported devices, it is said probably a GL841, based upon a trial by sane-find-scanner, probably. To make sure, the first thing I did after unpacking my brand new scanner was to open it (carefully!) and check for the chipset used. And it IS a GL842, not 841. As trustworthy as my eyes can be. It's all for today, I'm starting to have a look at the genesys backend and go through the GL841 and GL842 datasheets to make out where exactly is the difference between them. JB P.S. Henning, I've just sent you the form reporting for an unsupported device with the above information...
[sane-devel] Plustek OpticFilm 7200 : first investigations
Jean-Baka Domelevo schrieb: [...] Okay, I don't like the question mark after the name of the chip. On the sane-project webpage listing the unsupported devices, it is said probably a GL841, based upon a trial by sane-find-scanner, probably. To make sure, the first thing I did after unpacking my brand new scanner was to open it (carefully!) and check for the chipset used. And it IS a GL842, not 841. As trustworthy as my eyes can be. It's all for today, I'm starting to have a look at the genesys backend and go through the GL841 and GL842 datasheets to make out where exactly is the difference between them. gl841 and gl842 are identical from the driver side. The genesys backend works for my scanner which is a gl842 based Canon LiDE 35. Regards, Pierre
[sane-devel] Plustek OpticFilm 7200 : first investigations
On 1/28/06, Pierre Willenbrock pie...@pirsoft.dnsalias.org wrote: gl841 and gl842 are identical from the driver side. The genesys backend works for my scanner which is a gl842 based Canon LiDE 35. Hi Pierre, I've downloaded the genesys files from the CVS, and I've seen you're the main contributor to the genesys backend nowadays... Thanks very much for your work. You say gl841 and 842 are to be driven the exact same way... Great news, so the only thing I have to do is to work out a Genesys_Model struct for the OpticFilm 7200 to be but in genesys_devices.c ? And also ad something in Sensor[] and Motor[] ? I guess I will have to dig out what's the exact CCD in my box, right ? And also, it is said that the GL842 can handle 600, 1200 or 2400 dpi resolutions, nothing more? But Plustek repeatedly state that their scanner is a 7200 * 7200 dpi _in hardware_... What does it mean ? Thanks! JB
[sane-devel] Plustek OpticFilm 7200 : first investigations
Jean-Baka Domelevo schrieb: On 1/28/06, Pierre Willenbrock pie...@pirsoft.dnsalias.org wrote: gl841 and gl842 are identical from the driver side. The genesys backend works for my scanner which is a gl842 based Canon LiDE 35. Hi Pierre, I've downloaded the genesys files from the CVS, and I've seen you're the main contributor to the genesys backend nowadays... Thanks very much for your work. You say gl841 and 842 are to be driven the exact same way... Great news, so the only thing I have to do is to work out a Genesys_Model struct for the OpticFilm 7200 to be but in genesys_devices.c ? And also ad something in Sensor[] and Motor[] ? I guess I will have to dig out what's the exact CCD in my box, right ? Well, there is essentially no working support for the ccd of ccd-scanners. You will need to add that. The only scanners currently supported by the gl841 part use a cis sensor. The Motor struct is pretty simple to fill. You could default to 1 for maximum speed, and it should already be working, but be slow. Getting a fast scan is a bit harder. You need to look at a log from windows, and find the maximum final and starting speeds for each stepping mode. The Sensor struct contains mainly the same values as windows uses. And also, it is said that the GL842 can handle 600, 1200 or 2400 dpi resolutions, nothing more? But Plustek repeatedly state that their scanner is a 7200 * 7200 dpi _in hardware_... What does it mean ? The 600, 1200 and 2400dpi dpihw modes are actually used to select a specific memory model. Apart from that it is only used to calculate how many of the input pixels are sent to the host. For example, if the scanner has a 7200dpi sensor, and the chip is in 2400dpi mode, you would set dpiset to 1200 to get an 3600dpi image. Regards, Pierre
