[sane-devel] Scanning Time Question]]

2005-06-10 Thread Martin Collins
On Thu, 09 Jun 2005 21:38:41 +0200
Johannes Berg johan...@sipsolutions.net wrote:

I didn't catch the original post so I reply to the reply...

  So basically, SANE is the back end. Correct? Then as front end
  what will I use? I believe I was referring to VueScan as
  front-end. Please clarify this for me if I have a wrong
  understanding of SANE.

SANE provides backends (drivers) and frontends (applications). This
division allows third parties to produce their own frontends (Xsane,
quiteinsane) and facilitates network scanning.
Vuescan is more monolithic, Windows style, though I believe it does
use SANE backends for some scanners. Vuescan is aimed particularly at
film scanning so supports a wider range of film scanners than SANE.

  Last, any good web resource for learning and preparing myself for
  scanning? Like understanding colors saturations, etc..., 

www.scantips.com

Martin




[sane-devel] Scanning Time Question]]

2005-06-10 Thread Henning Meier-Geinitz
Hi,

On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 09:33:17PM +0200, Spiro Angeli wrote:
  johannes: Subscribe to the list.
 
 I did subscribe to sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Looks like you didn't. At least not with the address you use for
sending Mails to sane-devel (sp...@siriush.com). I've checked the list
of subscribers and you are not there.

 All I do is new email 
 and send it to: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
 Is this correct? If so, yes I am still getting the  [Your message to 
 sane-devel awaits moderator approval]
 Please help me clarify this issue.

You must use the same address for subscribing and sending mail. Or you
can subscribe multiple times and enable no mail for the addresses
that should only be used for sending mail.

Bye,
  Henning



[sane-devel] Scanning Time Question]]

2005-06-10 Thread Giuseppe Sacco
Il giorno gio, 09-06-2005 alle 21:33 +0200, Spiro Angeli ha scritto:
 Hi johannes,
[...]
  I thought you were going to use SANE. Then you don't need vuescan.
 So basically, SANE is the back end. Correct? Then as front end what will I 
 use? I believe I was referring to VueScan as front-end. Please clarify this 
 for me if I have a wrong understanding of SANE.
[...]

SANE includes many backends and a few frontends. There are also
external frontends for sane backends and external backends for sane
frontends.

All frontends I know are scanimage, xscanimage, xsane, gimp (uses
xscanimage or xsane), saned.

VueScan is a different product with its own frontend and backend.
VueScan and SANE are different products that do not talk each other.

An example of an external sane backend is HPAIO, parts of the HP Linux
Printing and Imaging System.

Giuseppe




[Re: [sane-devel] Scanning Time Question]]]

2005-06-10 Thread Spiro Angeli
Hi,

Yes, correct. I was using another email address. I did send a test message and 
went through fine.

So, this is resolved and sorry for the mistake.

Thank you,
Spiro

 Hi,

 On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 09:33:17PM +0200, Spiro Angeli wrote:
   johannes: Subscribe to the list.
 
  I did subscribe to sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

 Looks like you didn't. At least not with the address you use for
 sending Mails to sane-devel (sp...@siriush.com). I've checked the list
 of subscribers and you are not there.

  All I do is new email
  and send it to: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
  Is this correct? If so, yes I am still getting the  [Your message to
  sane-devel awaits moderator approval]
  Please help me clarify this issue.

 You must use the same address for subscribing and sending mail. Or you
 can subscribe multiple times and enable no mail for the addresses
 that should only be used for sending mail.

 Bye,
   Henning



[sane-devel] Scanning Time Question

2005-06-09 Thread Spiro Angeli
Hi,

Approaching 15000 pictures 35mm I wish to know, for those who already have the 
scanner (I am thinking to purchase a Nikon LS 4000 or LS 5000) how is the 
scanning process.

I explain better:
If I say I have 50 pictures to scan, how do you handle the scanning process? 
Is it possible to scan x number of pictures, holding them in memory and then 
save them to the disk all at once or do I have to scan and save, scan and 
save?

I am trying to understand what is that I will be faced with. I am also trying 
to figure out how much time it will take for me to scan pictures, and am 
trying to figure out how to standardize the process of manually scanning all 
these pictures.

I know that scanning time depends on the depth of the scanned picture. But is 
there a table that shows based on the depth of color and bits what is the 
time needed for the device to scan and save?

Thank you,
Spiro



[sane-devel] Scanning Time Question

2005-06-09 Thread Johannes Berg
--=-hoVIH9nrX2io8lBFh1mw
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 12:22 +0200, Spiro Angeli wrote:

 Approaching 15000 pictures 35mm I wish to know,=20

Wow :)

 for those who already have the=20
 scanner (I am thinking to purchase a Nikon LS 4000 or LS 5000) how is the=
=20
 scanning process.

the LS5000 isn't currently supported by sane.

 If I say I have 50 pictures to scan, how do you handle the scanning proce=
ss?=20
 Is it possible to scan x number of pictures, holding them in memory and t=
hen=20
 save them to the disk all at once or do I have to scan and save, scan and=
=20
 save?

You'll probably want to write a script/program that scans an image and
saves it to disk while the next one scans. That way, you don't need gigs
of memory but the scanner need not wait for the disk, nor the other way
around. An image scanned with the LS5000 would probably approach 60megs
or so.

 I am trying to understand what is that I will be faced with. I am also tr=
ying=20
 to figure out how much time it will take for me to scan pictures, and am=20
 trying to figure out how to standardize the process of manually scanning =
all=20
 these pictures.

In what format are they? slides? negatives?

 I know that scanning time depends on the depth of the scanned picture. Bu=
t is=20
 there a table that shows based on the depth of color and bits what is the=
=20
 time needed for the device to scan and save?

There's a table here:
http://filmscanner.info/NikonSuperCoolscan5000ED.html

Scroll down all the way to the bottom, then up until you hit the tables.
Just a few things: 'ohne' =3D without, 'mit' =3D with, 'Bild'=3Dpicture,
'Bilder'=3Dpictures, 'Stunde' =3D hour, 'Dia' =3D slide, 'Stapel'=3Dbatch,
'Vorschau'=3Dpreview, 'Einzel'=3Dsingle, 'Belichtung'=3Dexposure. (Now you
should be able to understand the tables)

johannes

--=-hoVIH9nrX2io8lBFh1mw
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Johannes Berg (SIP Solutions)

iQIVAwUAQqh8dKVg1VMiehFYAQKLuRAAtms36cICrrnV5eQW6U2VVMTnzhisFuOd
o7bhMffpBNTIwXMz/YmO5w+b/qVhf8zG6w03LBQoPMr/yMoUERMvjLLHk4NrCkZj
iktWWIgdktkZTYHUWymXl+CL4j6tz2EJ12MFP/EgxeiqW81HQhrfPziu5JpQcWxu
1nEXSfCWKVe0/gfozXof4z8Eef7sjR/MjuI03eqgHOyMS7+LDPmjVaTV5UNnl0t+
i2fapY8XYjbfY+TQ+5ydKpGqoUrquzG8MizHQcIZZGkEkyfXwHhxeU7L366Av8Aj
SpilcwuwtdlEHrnPKRCKaaK5XogBYHwIIQ9H4t5pird+NyBS89uNSzgsm097xusv
J806qGS6nfID8nGaf9muncJOweHPjWCtDMy7IMscqcfqsJa14LuXHHSO9J05HL1f
qTDjwq3WJWRtmaEwO9/oG5dPm0Xz7c+6ze3S4AzqpaIBl/FoF2CzGz7IXD9VwML3
EHSfdyc3nDH7e/7ASmVvpj5SMaTtU7fpkDVYn/lc2NAdn7Uoj2jJL1MkvolLs5Cn
7nrJdpnpp6rl2QSjkpoaZ519pLs2tEIIajKG9ipezoHZ6UkpTlRe2yksyBAMkz+6
EzU9uCOs88kOt9U33fgs9PDFnYmRg9AbLsTxTYcjnWuzb5ekd32jm+LBNg7m81h1
VTGrDEq/bHU=
=22GK
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--=-hoVIH9nrX2io8lBFh1mw--




[sane-devel] Scanning Time Question]

2005-06-09 Thread Johannes Berg
--=-AVo7SEvfXqtm8421c6eX
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

 Pictures are all 35mm of set of 4 per negative. They are not ( unfortunat=
ely )=20
 on a roll.

So they're in strips? That sucks. You're in for quite a bit of strip
changing then.

 As for application, because I am unable to run Nikon original software un=
der=20
 Gentoo Linux, I was thinking of  http://www.hamrick.com/ VueScan as offer=
ing=20
 the same and more features than what Nicon offers. Do you know anything a=
bout=20
 this or do you think gimps would be fine? Anything else to advice as=20
 application?

I thought you were going to use SANE. Then you don't need vuescan.

 As for format, I do not know yet. I assume it will be either jpeg or tiff=
. I=20
 think jpeg with a good resolution would be sufficient. It is not only for=
=20
 displaying on the monitor but also for prints. They have told me that=20
 nowadays, even a jpeg can be a good graphic format as long as it is well=20
 scanned.
 As for space, once I decided the file format and the compression I can fi=
gure=20
 out how much disk space I will need.

Yeah, whatever. You don't want to keep 20 images in memory though :)

 I like a lot the idea of the script that in the background while scanning=
 the=20
 next picture save the previous one.

Should be fairly easy. Trivial, however, is
scanning,saving,scanning,saving,

 Summing up, as of now, I have the idea of purchasing the Nikon 4000, with=
=20
 slides accessory (as I also have 300 slides) and perhaps VueScan software=
.

If you get the 4000 with the slides accessory you'll probably be able to
just scan from the command line and write a script to advance to the
next slide, scan, save it,  (or use scanadf maybe).

 There is a new Epson scanner PhotoPC F-3200 which I do not know well but =
it=20
 does not show up in the compatibility list.=20

No idea.

 Do you know if VueScan still needs SANE as backend?

No idea.

 LAST QUESTION: Any time I have to submit/reply an email, I mail it, it ge=
st on=20
 hold, and then it is sent to the mailing list. Is there a way to eliminat=
e=20
 the hold process, so that when I need help, I just write to=20
 sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org and it gets posted?

Subscribe to the list.

johannes

--=-AVo7SEvfXqtm8421c6eX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Johannes Berg (SIP Solutions)
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=R/X/
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--=-AVo7SEvfXqtm8421c6eX--




[sane-devel] Scanning Time Question]]

2005-06-09 Thread Johannes Berg
--=-FWC4exitATKR8YvzoVOf
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

 I did subscribe to sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org All I do is new ema=
il=20
 and send it to: sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
 Is this correct? If so, yes I am still getting the  [Your message to=20
 sane-devel awaits moderator approval]
 Please help me clarify this issue.

Oh, sorry. Then the list's server doesn't like you for some reason. But
I don't know why, the list admin might see it.

  I thought you were going to use SANE. Then you don't need vuescan.
 So basically, SANE is the back end. Correct? Then as front end what will =
I=20
 use? I believe I was referring to VueScan as front-end. Please clarify th=
is=20
 for me if I have a wrong understanding of SANE.

sane is the backend, yeah, but you want to use a script or a program
sane has as the frontend, like scanadf.

 Last, any good web resource for learning and preparing myself for scannin=
g?=20
 Like understanding colors saturations, etc...,=20

No idea, maybe others can help (I'd be interested too).

 besides also learning the=20
 front end program?

You don't want a GUI front end, you want something simple that scans the
pictures in succession and saves them with numbers. if you'd need to
push a button (or more) for each picture you'll  well...

johannes

--=-FWC4exitATKR8YvzoVOf
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Comment: Johannes Berg (SIP Solutions)
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=BjK7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--=-FWC4exitATKR8YvzoVOf--




[sane-devel] Scanning Time Question]

2005-06-09 Thread Spiro Angeli
Hi  johannes,

Yes, It is a big progect I have to work on.
Pictures are all 35mm of set of 4 per negative. They are not ( unfortunately ) 
on a roll.
Yes, writing a script would be super. I would have to learn this first.
But, as for model, if Nikon LS 5000 is not supported I think I will choose 
Nikon LS 4000 (which by now is well supported) as also comes with a rebate 
which makes it affordable.
As for application, because I am unable to run Nikon original software under 
Gentoo Linux, I was thinking of  http://www.hamrick.com/ VueScan as offering 
the same and more features than what Nicon offers. Do you know anything about 
this or do you think gimps would be fine? Anything else to advice as 
application?
As for format, I do not know yet. I assume it will be either jpeg or tiff. I 
think jpeg with a good resolution would be sufficient. It is not only for 
displaying on the monitor but also for prints. They have told me that 
nowadays, even a jpeg can be a good graphic format as long as it is well 
scanned.
As for space, once I decided the file format and the compression I can figure 
out how much disk space I will need.

I like a lot the idea of the script that in the background while scanning the 
next picture save the previous one.

Summing up, as of now, I have the idea of purchasing the Nikon 4000, with 
slides accessory (as I also have 300 slides) and perhaps VueScan software.
There is a new Epson scanner PhotoPC F-3200 which I do not know well but it 
does not show up in the compatibility list. 

Do you know if VueScan still needs SANE as backend?

LAST QUESTION: Any time I have to submit/reply an email, I mail it, it gest on 
hold, and then it is sent to the mailing list. Is there a way to eliminate 
the hold process, so that when I need help, I just write to 
sane-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org and it gets posted?

Thank you so much for the help.!
Spiro


 On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 12:22 +0200, Spiro Angeli wrote:
  Approaching 15000 pictures 35mm I wish to know,

 Wow :)

  for those who already have the
  scanner (I am thinking to purchase a Nikon LS 4000 or LS 5000) how is the
  scanning process.

 the LS5000 isn't currently supported by sane.

  If I say I have 50 pictures to scan, how do you handle the scanning
  process? Is it possible to scan x number of pictures, holding them in
  memory and then save them to the disk all at once or do I have to scan
  and save, scan and save?

 You'll probably want to write a script/program that scans an image and
 saves it to disk while the next one scans. That way, you don't need gigs
 of memory but the scanner need not wait for the disk, nor the other way
 around. An image scanned with the LS5000 would probably approach 60megs
 or so.

  I am trying to understand what is that I will be faced with. I am also
  trying to figure out how much time it will take for me to scan pictures,
  and am trying to figure out how to standardize the process of manually
  scanning all these pictures.

 In what format are they? slides? negatives?

  I know that scanning time depends on the depth of the scanned picture.
  But is there a table that shows based on the depth of color and bits what
  is the time needed for the device to scan and save?

 There's a table here:
 http://filmscanner.info/NikonSuperCoolscan5000ED.html

 Scroll down all the way to the bottom, then up until you hit the tables.
 Just a few things: 'ohne' = without, 'mit' = with, 'Bild'=picture,
 'Bilder'=pictures, 'Stunde' = hour, 'Dia' = slide, 'Stapel'=batch,
 'Vorschau'=preview, 'Einzel'=single, 'Belichtung'=exposure. (Now you
 should be able to understand the tables)

 johannes