Fedora 23 updates-testing report

2016-09-01 Thread updates 
The following Fedora 23 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 347  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16240   
nagios-4.0.8-1.fc23
 304  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-81ded368fe   
miniupnpc-1.9-6.fc23
 277  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-27392b3324   
jbig2dec-0.12-2.fc23
 228  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-dd52a54fa1   
python-pymongo-3.0.3-1.fc23
 228  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-06a7c972e8   
thttpd-2.25b-37.fc23
 193  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-637618fcd4   
mingw-nsis-2.50-1.fc23
  68  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fcccb0a547   
nodejs-0.10.46-1.fc23
  47  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-70b5173c05   
ecryptfs-utils-111-1.fc23
  35  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9402100276   
openssh-7.2p2-5.fc23 selinux-policy-3.13.1-158.22.fc23
  34  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8d79ade826   
flex-2.6.0-2.fc23
  34  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-aa394a130e   
nodejs-string-dot-prototype-dot-repeat-0.2.0-2.fc23
  23  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c2ec9c716e   
redis-3.2.3-1.fc23
  20  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b1a368   
389-ds-base-1.3.4.14-1.fc23
  20  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5aa6973100   
jasper-1.900.1-33.fc23
  16  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d6288f555c   
libarchive-3.2.1-3.fc23 python-libarchive-c-2.5-1.fc23
  14  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f9e951386e   
ca-certificates-2016.2.9-1.0.fc23
  14  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-47dc2b203f   
firewalld-0.4.3.3-1.fc23
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2b4ecfa79f   
libgcrypt-1.6.6-1.fc23
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8e55114267   
lcms2-2.8-2.fc23
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-87dde780b8   
glibc-2.22-18.fc23
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a0195918f   
gnupg-1.4.21-1.fc23
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d349b1c5f1   
ganglia-3.7.2-10.fc23
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-06e4de8210   
phpMyAdmin-4.6.4-2.fc23
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ce1678471e   
mediawiki-1.26.4-1.fc23
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-db62a2d5a6   
libksba-1.3.5-1.fc23
   1  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1f2444f878   
vdsm-4.18.999-440.git0bb7717.fc23
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-820a4795a9   
elog-3.1.1-7.fc23
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7e817cbf55   
slock-1.3-2.fc23
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b3a6435b14   
dhcpcd-6.11.3-1.fc23
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-7b4a60ae66   
python-jwcrypto-0.3.2-1.fc23


The following Fedora 23 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:
 Age URL
  43  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-98a7a1b6e0   
abrt-2.8.0-6.fc23 libreport-2.6.4-3.fc23
  35  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9402100276   
openssh-7.2p2-5.fc23 selinux-policy-3.13.1-158.22.fc23
  20  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5aa6973100   
jasper-1.900.1-33.fc23
  16  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d6288f555c   
libarchive-3.2.1-3.fc23 python-libarchive-c-2.5-1.fc23
  15  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-343c55ea44   
linux-firmware-20160816-67.git7c3dfc0b.fc23
  14  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-471ab66d4d   
nss-3.26.0-1.0.fc23 nss-softokn-3.26.0-1.0.fc23 nss-util-3.26.0-1.0.fc23
  14  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f9e951386e   
ca-certificates-2016.2.9-1.0.fc23
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-87dde780b8   
glibc-2.22-18.fc23
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f1f7e3722d   
systemd-222-16.fc23
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8e55114267   
lcms2-2.8-2.fc23
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-66a914144d   
libfm-1.2.4-6.D20160627git2a537414de.fc23
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2b4ecfa79f   
libgcrypt-1.6.6-1.fc23
  12  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1e281b415b   
redhat-rpm-config-37-1.fc23.1
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-bebe7b9c5b   
libavc1394-0.5.4-1.fc23
   9  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3a0195918f   
gnupg-1.4.21-1.fc23
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4de7497ac4   
gnupg2-2.1.13-2.fc23
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-221e4b44b9   
gnome-online-accounts-3.18.6-1.fc23
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-22e1403506   
livecd-tools-23.4-1.fc23
   4

Fedora 24 updates-testing report

2016-09-01 Thread updates 
The following Fedora 24 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  41  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b3f93ead5b   
moin-1.9.8-1.fc24
  23  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-32eaf0c41e   
redis-3.2.3-1.fc24
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0ef628998f   
chicken-4.11.0-3.fc24
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8749c58855   
ganglia-3.7.2-10.fc24
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2eef68e635   
phpMyAdmin-4.6.4-2.fc24
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-af3b0af887   
mediawiki-1.26.4-1.fc24
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-508767e6b7   
elog-3.1.1-7.fc24
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-985b68721b   
slock-1.3-2.fc24
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dcf5cad792   
python-jwcrypto-0.3.2-1.fc24


The following Fedora 24 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved:
 Age URL
  21  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ddadfe403c   
pungi-4.1.8-1.fc24 python-productmd-1.2-2.fc24
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-aa32e6e85b   
libfm-1.2.4-6.D20160627git2a537414de.fc24
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0edc0e1794   
livecd-tools-23.4-1.fc24
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-88d8834106   
pcmanfm-1.2.4-3.fc24
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3687780371   
libcdio-0.93-8.fc24
   0  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8d425ad02f   
orc-0.4.26-1.fc24


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 24 updates-testing

NetworkManager-ssh-1.2.1-0.fc24
adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts-1.017-2.fc24
astigmatic-grand-hotel-fonts-1.000-3.fc24
fedpkg-1.25-1.fc24
feh-2.17.1-1.fc24
gpodder-3.9.1-1.fc24
gr-air-modes-0-0.49.20160831git3bad1f5d.fc24
haproxy-1.6.9-1.fc24
hub-2.2.5-1.fc24
krop-0.4.11-2.fc24
libcdio-0.93-8.fc24
libmfx-1.16-1.20160317git7adf2e4.fc24
lilypond-2.19.47-1.fc24
lilypond-doc-2.19.47-1.fc24
lis-1.5.76-1.fc24
mingw-mediawriter-0-1.1git19b13a8.fc24
openfst-1.5.4-1.fc24
opengrm-ngram-1.3.1-1.fc24
orc-0.4.26-1.fc24
python-cvss-1.4-1.fc24
python-fauxquests-1.1-1.fc24
python-jwcrypto-0.3.2-1.fc24
python-pytest-mock-1.1-3.fc24
python-simpletal-4.3-11.fc24
python-toml-0.9.2-1.fc24
python3-simpletal-5.2-1.fc24
setroubleshoot-3.3.11-1.fc24
setroubleshoot-plugins-3.3.6-1.fc24
sphinxtrain-1.0.8-30.fc24
tlock-1.6-1.fc24
typetype-molot-fonts-1.000-4.fc24
varnish-agent-4.1.1-1.fc24

Details about builds:



 NetworkManager-ssh-1.2.1-0.fc24 (FEDORA-2016-94b9224d4c)
 NetworkManager VPN plugin for SSH

Update Information:

Update to 1.2.1 release

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1350244 - NetworkManager-ssh not working
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350244




 adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts-1.017-2.fc24 (FEDORA-2016-0aa7a43b4b)
 A set of OpenType fonts designed to complement Source Sans Pro

Update Information:

Initial package

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1371635 - Review Request: adobe-source-serif-pro-fonts - A set of 
OpenType fonts designed to complement Source Sans Pro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371635




 astigmatic-grand-hotel-fonts-1.000-3.fc24 (FEDORA-2016-8b432f332a)
 Script retro style fonts

Update Information:

New fonts for Fedora repository

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1368606 - Review Request: astigmatic-grand-hotel-fonts - Script 
retro style fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368606




 fedpkg-1.25-1.fc24 (FEDORA-2016-316df24b5a)
 Fedora utility for working with dist-git

Update Information:

- update project URL (mattdm) - Allow fedpkg to be compatible with both bodhi 1
and bodhi 2. (randy) -

Re: Fedora 25-20160901.n.0 compose check report

2016-09-01 Thread Adam Williamson 
On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 15:57 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> Missing expected images:
> 
> Cloud_base raw-xz i386
> Atomic raw-xz x86_64
> 
> Failed openQA tests: 15/89 (x86_64), 4/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
> 
> ID: 31621 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31621
> ID: 31622 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31622
> ID: 31628 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31628
> ID: 31629 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31629
> ID: 31630 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31630
> ID: 31631 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31631

These are mostly needle issues, and should be solved tomorrow. The
tests passed on staging, where I fixed the needles.

> ID: 31632 Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31632

This is the same ol' bug that's been around for months, but at least
there's some movement now.

> ID: 31641 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
> install_arm_image_deployment_upload
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31641

It seems initial-setup is not running on boot (or, possibly, it's just
too slow and we're not waiting long enough). Jan wrote the ARM test
stuff, so if you could look into this...

> ID: 31653 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31653

This is a dependency issue, but I haven't immediately been able to
reproduce it. I'll fiddle with it a bit more.

> ID: 31655 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31655

This is another odd dependency issue, dnf refusing to install firefox
because of some sqlite dependency issue, even though sqlite of the
correct version is present in the repos and images with firefox on them
composed just fine. Again, not quite sure what's going on here. It
could simply be that the tests ran with yesterday's repos and there was
a problem there, we'll see what happens tomorrow.

> ID: 31684 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31684

Same old: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347415
this should get fixed in the next anaconda update.

> ID: 31698 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31698
> ID: 31700 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31700
> ID: 31701 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31701
> ID: 31703 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31703
> ID: 31704 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31704
> ID: 31705 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31705
> ID: 31706 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31706
> ID: 31723 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31723
> ID: 31724 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
> URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31724

The desktop fails here are the same needle issues as with the desktop
image install tests. The others are:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1366793
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333591

> Passed openQA tests: 65/89 (x86_64), 13/17 (i386)
> 
> Skipped openQA tests: 8 of 108
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Testing idea: kernel 4.7 for Fedora 23 / Fedora 24

2016-09-01 Thread Joerg Lechner 
Hi
just loaded Kernel 4.7.2 in F24, boot ok, so far no further problems. Acer 
Laptop E15 E5-571G, F24 on an usb 3.0 flash medium.
Kind regards

 

 

 

-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- 
Von: Adam Williamson 
An: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases 

Verschickt: Mi, 31 Aug 2016 8:19 am
Betreff: Testing idea: kernel 4.7 for Fedora 23 / Fedora 24

Hi folks! Just thought I'd send out a testing idea for anyone who'slooking for 
something they can do.We currently have kernel 4.7 in updates-testing for 
Fedora 23 andFedora 24:23 - 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f1adaaadc624 - 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2e5ebfed6dit's always good 
to get new kernel releases tested on as much hardwareas possible, so if you 
haven't done it yet, please try updating thekernel on any machines you have 
running Fedora 23 or 24. This commandshould do it:dnf 
--enablerepo=updates-testing update kernel*then you can reboot, and check if 
all your hardware and your normal useof the system works OK with the new 
kernel. If it does, give positivefeedback for the update; if not, file a bug 
and give negative feedbackfor the update, with a link to your bug report. 
Testing kernel updatesis nice and safe, because even if it doesn't work well, 
you can justreboot and pick an older kernel from the boot menu - Fedora will 
alwayskeep three kernels installed, so you have a fallback if the newest 
onedoesn't work right.Thanks everyone! :)Just as a quick note on other testing 
topics: for Fedora 25 validation,we'll start getting nightly composes 
'nominated' for testing againsoon, working towards the Beta release; Beta 
freeze is 2016-09-27, so amonth or so to go before we start thinking about Beta 
RCs. The Fedora25 Test Days should also be starting up soon - Sumantro is away 
rightnow, but I expect we'll start seeing announcements soon, so look outfor 
those! And of course, we can always test updates (not just thekernel updates) 
for 23, 24 and 25. Happy testing :)--test mailing 
listtest@lists.fedoraproject.orgTo 
unsubscribe:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 25-20160901.n.0 compose check report

2016-09-01 Thread Fedora compose checker 
Missing expected images:

Cloud_base raw-xz i386
Atomic raw-xz x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 15/89 (x86_64), 4/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 31621   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31621
ID: 31622   Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31622
ID: 31628   Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31628
ID: 31629   Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31629
ID: 31630   Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31630
ID: 31631   Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31631
ID: 31632   Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31632
ID: 31641   Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31641
ID: 31653   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31653
ID: 31655   Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31655
ID: 31684   Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31684
ID: 31698   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31698
ID: 31700   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31700
ID: 31701   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31701
ID: 31703   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31703
ID: 31704   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31704
ID: 31705   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31705
ID: 31706   Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31706
ID: 31723   Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31723
ID: 31724   Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/31724

Passed openQA tests: 65/89 (x86_64), 13/17 (i386)

Skipped openQA tests: 8 of 108
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: 'dnf system-upgrade reboot' doesn't do anything

2016-09-01 Thread Chris Murphy 
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Richard Ryniker  wrote:
> I am unhappy with the suggestion that the semantics of kernel parameters
> may depend on some notion about how "temporary" they are.  If a kernel
> parameter is specified, it is present; if not specified, it is absent.

3 isn't even a kernel parameter, most things now on the kernel
parameter line isn't even meant for the kernel, there is no way to
infer what will parse it or what it does. It's a simple hack, and
therefore it means the user has to, you know, know what the fuck
they're doing when they use boot params.

What you're basically saying is, you're unhappy that you have to know
what the fuck you're doing to get it to do what you want it to do.
Sorry.

> It is proper to design parameter syntax and default values to favor
> common usage.  There also have to be mechanisms to handle different
> specifications for the same parameter (first or last wins...) and use of
> incompatible parameters (pick one, ignore both... but always log the
> choice!)

The last one wins. The last one is the 3 because that's what you set
at boot time. By doing that, you're asking for multi-user.target which
is exactly what you get. You do not ever get default.target. and since
/system-update symlink causes default.target to mean
system-update.target, you don't get that.




>
> In this case, "dnf system-upgrade reboot" is an explicit command to
> perform an offline system update.

Followed 10 seconds later by your 3. Last one wins.


>That is what should happen,
> regardless of the (default) target.  Any target specification should
> apply after the offline update.

You overrode that. That's what you're asking for when you set 3 in the
bootloader configuration. If you don't like that, stop doing things
wrong, and start doing them correctly.

> Are you concerned about the possibility "dnf system-upgrade reboot" was
> ordered, then immediately decided it was wrong?  How many times do you
> want to ask "Do you really mean this?"  Why should specification of
> boot target 3 as a kernel parameter pretermit the offline update - but
> possibly leave it waiting to occur unexpectedly during a subsequent boot?

I don't have answers to your questions because I refuse the premise by
which they even arise. I only use 3 when I'm editing a particular boot
menu entry, non-persistently. If I wanted it persistent I'd change
what default.target points to. That's the correct way to make
persistent changes.

Boot parameters make the OS less portable also. And I foresee the day
when Fedora cannot be booted from another OS's bootloader because of
this.

> Your explanation of how systemd implements offline update using a symlink
> offers an escape: boot from a different root file system (a live image,
> if necessary) and remove the offline update symlink.  If you think that
> is too esoteric or awkward, implement a new kernel parameter such as
> "cancel-offline-update" that does this.

Request denied.



> What is the relation between run level 1 and offline update?  Does run
> level 1 stop the init process before offline update?  If yes, then that
> is an easy escape: boot to run level 1, remove the offline update
> symlink, then "systemctl default".

My expectation is that any runlevel specified as a boot parameter will
inhibit use of default.target and inhibit the offline update.
Explicitly stating the runlevel at boot time means don't use
default.target.


-- 
Chris Murphy
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: 'dnf system-upgrade reboot' doesn't do anything

2016-09-01 Thread Richard Ryniker 
I am unhappy with the suggestion that the semantics of kernel parameters
may depend on some notion about how "temporary" they are.  If a kernel
parameter is specified, it is present; if not specified, it is absent.

It is proper to design parameter syntax and default values to favor
common usage.  There also have to be mechanisms to handle different
specifications for the same parameter (first or last wins...) and use of
incompatible parameters (pick one, ignore both... but always log the
choice!)

In this case, "dnf system-upgrade reboot" is an explicit command to
perform an offline system update.  That is what should happen,
regardless of the (default) target.  Any target specification should
apply after the offline update.

Are you concerned about the possibility "dnf system-upgrade reboot" was
ordered, then immediately decided it was wrong?  How many times do you
want to ask "Do you really mean this?"  Why should specification of
boot target 3 as a kernel parameter pretermit the offline update - but
possibly leave it waiting to occur unexpectedly during a subsequent boot?

Your explanation of how systemd implements offline update using a symlink
offers an escape: boot from a different root file system (a live image,
if necessary) and remove the offline update symlink.  If you think that
is too esoteric or awkward, implement a new kernel parameter such as
"cancel-offline-update" that does this.

What is the relation between run level 1 and offline update?  Does run
level 1 stop the init process before offline update?  If yes, then that
is an easy escape: boot to run level 1, remove the offline update
symlink, then "systemctl default".
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Testing idea: kernel 4.7 for Fedora 23 / Fedora 24

2016-09-01 Thread Akinsola Akinwale 
Hi,

Updated on HP Pavilion g6 and it booted fine. it is currently working perfectly 
hardwares detected correctly F24.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Self-introduction: Craig MacEachern

2016-09-01 Thread Corey Sheldon 
cmaceach...@sdf.org:
> Greetings folks,
> 
> I'm interested in helping out QA to get myself more involved with the
> *nix ecosystem I've used for many years. I have no prior QA experience,
> but I am excited to learn!
> 
> My story:
> Learned computing back in the DOS and BBS days (still love the King's
> Quest and point-and-click genre of games). Discovered *nix around mid
> 90s, but had so many problems even getting X to run (from what I
> remember, there were ACPI issues and the infamous wireless drivers
> issues). Got more serious about *nix in the mid 2000s when Ubuntu was
> taking off. Ubuntu expanded my horizons and led me to discover Fedora. I
> stick with Fedora as the sysadmin aspect of it carries over nicely into
> most corporate environments with either RedHat or CentOS deployments.
> 
> Credentials/experience in sysadmin/programming:
> * I use, and maybe abuse, CentOS 6.x and 7.x on work servers daily. I do
> light sysadmin/devops stuff (running an internal wiki, running
> bash/python scripts)
> * I run Fedora 24 at home as my daily driver.
> * Passed the Linux Foundation Certified System Administrator course a
> couple years ago. It just lapsed last month and I don't feel like
> shelling out another $300 to do the exam again and re-certify.
> * Several years programming experience, self-taught through online
> course, books, articles, etc. Experience developing python GUI apps with
> both QT and Tk, and homebrew games with SDL and C. Other languages
> sprinkled here and there over the years (PHP/MySQL, QBasic!).
> 
> Fun facts: I have a Master of Library Science degree and an English
> degree. Greatly regret not doing computer science, but seems to have
> worked out okay regardless. Hobies are wood working and brazilian
> jiu-jitsu.
> 
> Thanks everyone, and nice to meet you all!
> 
> Craig MacEachern, aka saltycraig
> 
> cmaceach...@sdf.org
> SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org
> -- 
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Craig,
Welcome to the ML.

I trust you have found the release validation pages [0][1]

[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/SOP_Release_Validation_Test_Event



Hope to see you around in meetings and the ML in the coming weeks and
months..


-- 
Corey Sheldon
+1 310.909.7672
0x8B4E89435A88E539 | C006 564F FA67 CDEA E29B  F202 8B4E 8943 5A88 E539
0x59276298D2264944 | 6292 9ABD 6374 6AA7 6D4B  730F 5927 6298 D226 4944
https://gist.github.com/linux-modder/ac5dc6fa211315c633c9 ||
https://keybase.io/linuxmodder
'Have no limitation, as limitation,  have no way as way' --Bruce Lee
'Everything is impossible, until it's Done!'  -- Nelson Mandela
'Any man willing to sacrifice freedom for security, deserves neither'
--Benjamin Franklin

Disclaimer: All correspondence shall be deemed privileged and
confidential unless otherwise stated in the contents of respective
correspondence.  All emails ARE signed with at least one of the keys
shown above. Any email or correspondence lacking such shall be regarded
as suspect. The key signed or encrypted with IS ALWAYS attached as a
$keyid.asc, $keyid.sig, or included in the attached csv file. If this
correspondence has reached you in error please disregard it and it is
kindly requested that a return email with a simple subject 'Miss-routed
mail, please remove me' shall be sufficient. GPG mail is openly and
freely solicited.


0xD2264944.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Testing idea: kernel 4.7 for Fedora 23 / Fedora 24

2016-09-01 Thread Neal Becker 
booted on lenovo X1 carbon OK
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't login in Wayland after change language from Russian to English in Fedora 25 alpha

2016-09-01 Thread Alexander Kolesnikov 
2016-09-01 13:36 GMT+03:00 Kamil Paral :
>
> Hi, when you say you installed it in Russian language, have you also
> configured Russian keyboard layout (that is the default when you pick
> Russian language), or have you used USA keyboard by default? What keyboard
> layout have you used when creating the password for your user in anaconda?
> When you say you changed your language to English in GNOME, do you mean
> changing *only* the language, or have you also changed the keyboard layouts?
>
> When you are in GDM and you can't log in - does switching the keyboard
> layout (should be available in top right corner) help?
>
> Do you have multiple standard users defined in the system, or just one
> (because if you have just one, GNOME changes the language of the whole
> system, if you have more of them, it changes the language of just that one
> user).
>

In anakonda I configure Russian keyboard layout and create only password
for root without creation new user. New user I create after installation
for in first login via root. I have two lamguage layouts: Russian and
English.
After installation I have RU.png (in attachments) settings and change to
EN.png settings.

Best regards,
Alexander Kolesnikov
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Self-introduction: Craig MacEachern

2016-09-01 Thread cmaceachern 

Greetings folks,

I'm interested in helping out QA to get myself more involved with the *nix 
ecosystem I've used for many years. I have no prior QA experience, but I 
am excited to learn!


My story:
Learned computing back in the DOS and BBS days (still love the King's 
Quest and point-and-click genre of games). Discovered *nix around mid 90s, 
but had so many problems even getting X to run (from what I remember, 
there were ACPI issues and the infamous wireless drivers issues). Got more 
serious about *nix in the mid 2000s when Ubuntu was taking off. Ubuntu 
expanded my horizons and led me to discover Fedora. I stick with Fedora as 
the sysadmin aspect of it carries over nicely into most corporate 
environments with either RedHat or CentOS deployments.


Credentials/experience in sysadmin/programming:
* I use, and maybe abuse, CentOS 6.x and 7.x on work servers daily. I do 
light sysadmin/devops stuff (running an internal wiki, running bash/python 
scripts)

* I run Fedora 24 at home as my daily driver.
* Passed the Linux Foundation Certified System Administrator course a 
couple years ago. It just lapsed last month and I don't feel like shelling 
out another $300 to do the exam again and re-certify.
* Several years programming experience, self-taught through online course, 
books, articles, etc. Experience developing python GUI apps with both QT 
and Tk, and homebrew games with SDL and C. Other languages sprinkled here 
and there over the years (PHP/MySQL, QBasic!).


Fun facts: I have a Master of Library Science degree and an English 
degree. Greatly regret not doing computer science, but seems to have 
worked out okay regardless. Hobies are wood working and brazilian 
jiu-jitsu.


Thanks everyone, and nice to meet you all!

Craig MacEachern, aka saltycraig

cmaceach...@sdf.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't login in Wayland after change language from Russian to English in Fedora 25 alpha

2016-09-01 Thread Alexander Kolesnikov 
2016-09-01 14:28 GMT+03:00 Kamil Paral :

I think I have reproduced the bug and reported it here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372300
>
> Can you please confirm whether the workaround works for you (switching the
> keyboard layout to a different one and then back to the desired one)?
> Thanks.
>


Switching the keyboard layout in Log In window? First EN->RU then RU->EN
and try to login? Or what?
If you mean this case - it does not work.


Best regards,
Alexander Kolesnikov
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Testing idea: kernel 4.7 for Fedora 23 / Fedora 24

2016-09-01 Thread Joerg Lechner 
Hi,
have updated the F23 Kernel to 4.7.2 -> so far no problems, an update of F24 is 
still not possible Kernel 4.7.2 seem so far not to be in updates-testing.
Kind regards

 

 

 

-Ursprüngliche Mitteilung- 
Von: Adam Williamson 
An: For testing and quality assurance of Fedora releases 

Verschickt: Mi, 31 Aug 2016 8:19 am
Betreff: Testing idea: kernel 4.7 for Fedora 23 / Fedora 24

Hi folks! Just thought I'd send out a testing idea for anyone who'slooking for 
something they can do.We currently have kernel 4.7 in updates-testing for 
Fedora 23 andFedora 24:23 - 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f1adaaadc624 - 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2e5ebfed6dit's always good 
to get new kernel releases tested on as much hardwareas possible, so if you 
haven't done it yet, please try updating thekernel on any machines you have 
running Fedora 23 or 24. This commandshould do it:dnf 
--enablerepo=updates-testing update kernel*then you can reboot, and check if 
all your hardware and your normal useof the system works OK with the new 
kernel. If it does, give positivefeedback for the update; if not, file a bug 
and give negative feedbackfor the update, with a link to your bug report. 
Testing kernel updatesis nice and safe, because even if it doesn't work well, 
you can justreboot and pick an older kernel from the boot menu - Fedora will 
alwayskeep three kernels installed, so you have a fallback if the newest 
onedoesn't work right.Thanks everyone! :)Just as a quick note on other testing 
topics: for Fedora 25 validation,we'll start getting nightly composes 
'nominated' for testing againsoon, working towards the Beta release; Beta 
freeze is 2016-09-27, so amonth or so to go before we start thinking about Beta 
RCs. The Fedora25 Test Days should also be starting up soon - Sumantro is away 
rightnow, but I expect we'll start seeing announcements soon, so look outfor 
those! And of course, we can always test updates (not just thekernel updates) 
for 23, 24 and 25. Happy testing :)--test mailing 
listtest@lists.fedoraproject.orgTo 
unsubscribe:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't login in Wayland after change language from Russian to English in Fedora 25 alpha

2016-09-01 Thread Kamil Paral 
> > Hi all!
> 

> > I am install Fedora 25 Alpha Workstation with Russian language. In settings
> > change language to English and log out. After that I can't login into my
> > users (root and new account). Reopens the login window without errors. But
> > if I change settings from GNOME to GNOME on Xorg - I can login.
> 

> > Best regards,
> 
> > Alexander Kolesnikov
> 

> Hi, when you say you installed it in Russian language, have you also
> configured Russian keyboard layout (that is the default when you pick
> Russian language), or have you used USA keyboard by default? What keyboard
> layout have you used when creating the password for your user in anaconda?
> When you say you changed your language to English in GNOME, do you mean
> changing *only* the language, or have you also changed the keyboard layouts?

> When you are in GDM and you can't log in - does switching the keyboard layout
> (should be available in top right corner) help?

> Do you have multiple standard users defined in the system, or just one
> (because if you have just one, GNOME changes the language of the whole
> system, if you have more of them, it changes the language of just that one
> user).

> Thanks.

I think I have reproduced the bug and reported it here: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372300 

Can you please confirm whether the workaround works for you (switching the 
keyboard layout to a different one and then back to the desired one)? Thanks. 
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Self-introduction: Akinsola

2016-09-01 Thread Akinsola Akinwale 
Thanks 
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Self-introduction: Akinsola

2016-09-01 Thread Akinsola Akinwale 
I am grateful for the approval and would subsequently ask if I need help.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't login in Wayland after change language from Russian to English in Fedora 25 alpha

2016-09-01 Thread Kamil Paral 
> Hi all!

> I am install Fedora 25 Alpha Workstation with Russian language. In settings
> change language to English and log out. After that I can't login into my
> users (root and new account). Reopens the login window without errors. But
> if I change settings from GNOME to GNOME on Xorg - I can login.

> Best regards,
> Alexander Kolesnikov

Hi, when you say you installed it in Russian language, have you also configured 
Russian keyboard layout (that is the default when you pick Russian language), 
or have you used USA keyboard by default? What keyboard layout have you used 
when creating the password for your user in anaconda? When you say you changed 
your language to English in GNOME, do you mean changing *only* the language, or 
have you also changed the keyboard layouts? 

When you are in GDM and you can't log in - does switching the keyboard layout 
(should be available in top right corner) help? 

Do you have multiple standard users defined in the system, or just one (because 
if you have just one, GNOME changes the language of the whole system, if you 
have more of them, it changes the language of just that one user). 

Thanks. 
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't login in Wayland after change language from Russian to English in Fedora 25 alpha

2016-09-01 Thread Pavlo Rudyi 
On Wed, 2016-08-31 at 16:17 +0300, Alexander Kolesnikov wrote:
> Hi all!
> 
> I am install Fedora 25 Alpha Workstation with Russian language. In
> settings change language to English and log out. After that I can't
> login into my users (root and new account). Reopens the login window
> without errors. But if I change settings from GNOME to GNOME on Xorg
> - I can login.

The sanctions, you should be ready for it.

--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Can't login in Wayland after change language from Russian to English in Fedora 25 alpha

2016-09-01 Thread Alexander Kolesnikov 
2016-08-31 19:14 GMT+03:00 Chris Murphy :

>
>
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Alexander Kolesnikov  > wrote:
>
>> Hi all!
>>
>> I am install Fedora 25 Alpha Workstation with Russian language. In
>> settings change language to English and log out. After that I can't login
>> into my users (root and new account). Reopens the login window without
>> errors. But if I change settings from GNOME to GNOME on Xorg - I can login.
>>
>
> Could be gdm or gnome-shell, not sure. If you can file a bug and attach
> 'journalctl --since=-30m > journal.log' that'd be useful. If you can
> tighten up the time estimate that keeps it a bit cleaner; so if you know
> the failed login attempt on Wayland was about 5 minutes ago, you can do
> --since=-6m or whatever, a little more is better than cutting it off. That
> is a minus before the number.
>

Hi, Chris.

I am trying to login via GUI with Wayland and after that use 'journalctl
--since=-30m > journal.log via ssh. And attach file.


journal1.log
Description: Binary data
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Presentation - Ask for approval

2016-09-01 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee 


- Original Message -
> From: "Rodrigo de Araujo" 
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 8:41:19 PM
> Subject: Presentation - Ask for approval
> 
> Hello there,
> 
> My name is Rodrigo, I'm 32 y.o and I am from Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
> 
> I am writing because I would like to join the Fedora Quality Assurance Group,
> please. I already asked to join on the FAS system, so now it's pending of
> approval.
> 
> I have a degree in Advertising and as a graduate student I am working on a
> Master degree in Language and Technology. I work as a Audiovisual Producer
> and Editor here.
> 
> I already help the project by voting for tags and adding tags to packages
> without them. I also installed Fedora on 6 computers of friends and family
> members, etc.
> 
> By joining this group I think I would be able to vote for supplemental
> wallpapers too which is great. :-)
> 
> I pĺan to learn more about Testing and QA so I can help the group in the next
> releases.
> 
> Thank you for your time.
> 
> My FAS account name is 'rodrigodearaujo'
> 
> With my best regards,
> 
> Rodrigo

Hey and Welcome avillarreal

Thanks for your interest in joining qa team, I have approved your request.

Next,You can start with Release Validation testing. In Release Validation all 
you need to do is to check the nightly/TC/RC against certain criteria. For 
example, let's take the latest alpha candidate, you can run test cases which 
are mentioned [1] and submit your results in the test matrix.

Note that each of the test cases[2] will have "How to test" section which will 
have the steps (to be executed sequentially) and if the results match with the 
expected results you can mark it as pass by editing the wiki page 
{{result|PASS|}} . Always make sure to check for "Associated 
release criterion" which can be found on the top of test case page , if your 
test case fails you can mark it fail by editing the wiki page 
{{result|FAIL|}} and file a bug at RHBZ [3] under Fedora.


 You can always find the ‘current’ validation pages using these addresses:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Server_Test
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Cloud_Test

You can also do update-testing, update testing is where a tester tests a 
package and gives out a +1 Karma for PASS and -1 Karma for FAIL. You can go to 
bodhi.fedoraproject.org where you can sort the packages with Fedora Releases 
and tags viz "pending" & "testing" . You can read much about update testing 
here [4]. You can also, use fedora-easy-karma for giving out feedbacks.

[1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_Alpha_1.2_Summary?rd=Test_Results:Current_Summary
[2]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_USB_stick_Live_luc
[3]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
[4]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
Should you have any question, you reach out to me directly or in the list!

We also have on-boarding call when we have ~10 new people joining qa group , On 
boarding calls are video+text (Hangout sessions) where we run through how to 
start and focus on how to do testing the right way. Lookout for the "Call for 
action On boarding Call" email this month!  

Thanks
Sumantro
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Introduction: Adan

2016-09-01 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee 


- Original Message -
> From: "Adan Villarreal" 
> To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 1, 2016 4:53:22 AM
> Subject: Introduction: Adan
> 
> Hi, my name is Adan Villarreal. I am a 19 year old software engineering
> student and have been using linux for a while. I want to contribute to the
> project in some way.
> I have experience with c++, java, python and a bit of security.
> Hope I can help.
> 
> Adan Villarreal
> IRC: avillarreal
> 
Hey and Welcome avillarreal

You can start off with requesting sponsorship of "qa" group if you haven't done 
already. 

Next,You can start with Release Validation testing. In Release Validation all 
you need to do is to check the nightly/TC/RC against certain criteria. For 
example, let's take the latest alpha candidate, you can run test cases which 
are mentioned [1] and submit your results in the test matrix.

Note that each of the test cases[2] will have "How to test" section which will 
have the steps (to be executed sequentially) and if the results match with the 
expected results you can mark it as pass by editing the wiki page 
{{result|PASS|}} . Always make sure to check for "Associated 
release criterion" which can be found on the top of test case page , if your 
test case fails you can mark it fail by editing the wiki page 
{{result|FAIL|}} and file a bug at RHBZ [3] under Fedora.


 You can always find the ‘current’ validation pages using these addresses:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Server_Test
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Cloud_Test

You can also do update-testing, update testing is where a tester tests a 
package and gives out a +1 Karma for PASS and -1 Karma for FAIL. You can go to 
bodhi.fedoraproject.org where you can sort the packages with Fedora Releases 
and tags viz "pending" & "testing" . You can read much about update testing 
here [4]. You can also, use fedora-easy-karma for giving out feedbacks.

[1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_25_Alpha_1.2_Summary?rd=Test_Results:Current_Summary
[2]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_USB_stick_Live_luc
[3]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
[4]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
Should you have any question, you reach out to me directly or in the list!

Thanks
Sumantro
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/test@lists.fedoraproject.org