Re: [Tinycc-devel] mob-stuff branch?
On 25.10.2022 00:08, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
AFAICS the "warn about incorrect use of output_*" by using an enum did
never end up on mob.
Just because features often come with more complexity does not mean
that more complexity already is a feature.
Much more often the contrary is true: the simpler the better.
"int output_type;" is simple.
"output_t output_type;" is "output_t(ype)" twice. Honestly, I still
fail to see the point, even 13 years later ... ;)
-- gr
We seem to have --{no-,}whole-archive by now, so that's obsolete i
guess. And the elf-interpreter toggle is in there, too, so that's fine.
Not sure what you would think about the idea i toyed with in "add
--enable-shared, part1". IIRC the idea was to cut down on memory usage
when running many tcc processes or something along those lines.
thanks!
$ git log -n7 origin/mob-stuff
commit bfa394dab88cb417bb540c32647f04d08e9838af (origin/mob-stuff)
Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Date: Wed Sep 2 15:55:48 2009 +0200
Move bounds-checking code to a bcheck.a
... to avoid undefined references to __bound_new_region()
(when using a libtcc1_s.so instead of libtcc1.a) on i386.
That's an open question I think.
Signed-off-by: aldot
commit a39d055d0e666b152df87b4a603c670c3af37d68
Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Date: Wed Sep 2 15:55:48 2009 +0200
Handle --whole-archive
Support and document -Wl,--{no-,}whole-archive.
done.
Didn't check if what's in there actually works.
Signed-off-by: aldot
commit f0e8b23d02a4c06789b4b8876c65866a237ce570
Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Date: Tue Sep 1 13:32:34 2009 +0200
Implement -m{uclibc,glibc} to choose elf_interp
Support -muclibc and -mglibc (default) to choose between the elf
interpreter like gcc does.
$ ./tcc -o hi-glibc hello.c
$ ./tcc -muclibc -o hi-uclibc hello.c
$ readelf -l hi-* | egrep "(^File: | interpreter)"
File: hi-glibc
[Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux.so.2]
File: hi-uclibc
[Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-uClibc.so.0]
Presumably done.
Didn't check how it's implemented though.
Signed-off-by: aldot
commit 83cb1364a606fa9fbff450a65ab68e09a5bb4e42
Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Date: Wed Sep 2 12:03:51 2009 +0200
Revert "add --enable-shared, part1"
This reverts commit 9257c5221ea4f095d813082716f786c6c5d23321.
Signed-off-by: aldot
commit d90eb2008b62d19f70bdd14bdf9d784b8789da5d
Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Date: Tue Sep 1 17:04:42 2009 +0200
add --enable-shared, part1
Build a libtcc.so and link the tcc binary against it.
That area is, i believe, not dealt with yet, is it?
It would serve 2 purposes:
- Runtime mem consumption reduction.
- Would help establish an improved interface to the "backend".
I'd encourage discussion around that area.
Mainly to cleanup an streamline internal interfaces TBH.
Signed-off-by: aldot
commit 8a555345e3faa37ff0b2c0b84ae1f42358400923
Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Date: Tue Sep 1 14:27:41 2009 +0200
warn about incorrect use of output_*
Not addressed yet.
I think we should do something along those lines. WDYT?
Signed-off-by: aldot
commit 3a40b44938d59b71d0c010579d9bd9f05e7eed46
Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Date: Tue Sep 1 11:52:51 2009 +0200
allow for non-stripped install
That's not dealt with as far as I'm aware.
Nowadays distros tend to split off -dbgsym packages on their own. So if we
strip the debug on our own, this defeats usability and debug ability for distro
users IMO.
I think we should at least give distros an easy way to decide on their own,
shouldn't we.
thanks and cheers,
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] mob-stuff branch?
On 24 October 2022 21:05:46 CEST, grischka wrote:
>On 23.10.2022 09:48, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
>> Hi Grischka and folks!
>>
>> I have just pulled after some time.
>> In my clone, i see a remotes/origin/mob-stuff branch and i wonder what
>> that is/was about, does anybody remember by chance? Was that a staging
>> area for mob or somesuch?
>>
>> Maybe it's an artifact that was pruned already?
>
>Hi,
>
>Indeed I did delete that branch (and another one) remotely not that
>long ago (because of presumably little public interest).
Fair enough, but see below.
>> The last couple of commits on that branch are listed below.
>>
>> AFAICS the "warn about incorrect use of output_*" by using an enum did
>> never end up on mob.
>> We seem to have --{no-,}whole-archive by now, so that's obsolete i
>> guess. And the elf-interpreter toggle is in there, too, so that's fine.
>>
>> Not sure what you would think about the idea i toyed with in "add
>> --enable-shared, part1". IIRC the idea was to cut down on memory usage
>> when running many tcc processes or something along those lines.
>>
>> thanks!
>>
>> $ git log -n7 origin/mob-stuff
>> commit bfa394dab88cb417bb540c32647f04d08e9838af (origin/mob-stuff)
>> Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> Date: Wed Sep 2 15:55:48 2009 +0200
>>
>> Move bounds-checking code to a bcheck.a
>>
>> ... to avoid undefined references to __bound_new_region()
>> (when using a libtcc1_s.so instead of libtcc1.a) on i386.
>>
That's an open question I think.
>> Signed-off-by: aldot
>>
>> commit a39d055d0e666b152df87b4a603c670c3af37d68
>> Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> Date: Wed Sep 2 15:55:48 2009 +0200
>>
>> Handle --whole-archive
>>
>> Support and document -Wl,--{no-,}whole-archive.
done.
Didn't check if what's in there actually works.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: aldot
>>
>> commit f0e8b23d02a4c06789b4b8876c65866a237ce570
>> Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> Date: Tue Sep 1 13:32:34 2009 +0200
>>
>> Implement -m{uclibc,glibc} to choose elf_interp
>>
>>Support -muclibc and -mglibc (default) to choose between the elf
>>interpreter like gcc does.
>>
>>$ ./tcc -o hi-glibc hello.c
>>$ ./tcc -muclibc -o hi-uclibc hello.c
>>$ readelf -l hi-* | egrep "(^File: | interpreter)"
>> File: hi-glibc
>>[Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux.so.2]
>> File: hi-uclibc
>>[Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-uClibc.so.0]
Presumably done.
Didn't check how it's implemented though.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: aldot
>>
>> commit 83cb1364a606fa9fbff450a65ab68e09a5bb4e42
>> Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> Date: Wed Sep 2 12:03:51 2009 +0200
>>
>> Revert "add --enable-shared, part1"
>>
>> This reverts commit 9257c5221ea4f095d813082716f786c6c5d23321.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: aldot
>>
>> commit d90eb2008b62d19f70bdd14bdf9d784b8789da5d
>> Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> Date: Tue Sep 1 17:04:42 2009 +0200
>>
>> add --enable-shared, part1
>>
>>Build a libtcc.so and link the tcc binary against it.
That area is, i believe, not dealt with yet, is it?
It would serve 2 purposes:
- Runtime mem consumption reduction.
- Would help establish an improved interface to the "backend".
I'd encourage discussion around that area.
Mainly to cleanup an streamline internal interfaces TBH.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: aldot
>>
>> commit 8a555345e3faa37ff0b2c0b84ae1f42358400923
>> Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> Date: Tue Sep 1 14:27:41 2009 +0200
>>
>> warn about incorrect use of output_*
>>
Not addressed yet.
I think we should do something along those lines. WDYT?
>> Signed-off-by: aldot
>>
>> commit 3a40b44938d59b71d0c010579d9bd9f05e7eed46
>> Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> Date: Tue Sep 1 11:52:51 2009 +0200
>>
>> allow for non-stripped install
>>
That's not dealt with as far as I'm aware.
Nowadays distros tend to split off -dbgsym packages on their own. So if we
strip the debug on our own, this defeats usability and debug ability for distro
users IMO.
I think we should at least give distros an easy way to decide on their own,
shouldn't we.
thanks and cheers,
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
Re: [Tinycc-devel] mob-stuff branch?
On 23.10.2022 09:48, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
Hi Grischka and folks!
I have just pulled after some time.
In my clone, i see a remotes/origin/mob-stuff branch and i wonder what
that is/was about, does anybody remember by chance? Was that a staging
area for mob or somesuch?
Maybe it's an artifact that was pruned already?
Hi,
Indeed I did delete that branch (and another one) remotely not that
long ago (because of presumably little public interest).
As to what it was, I think there was a strategy used two or three
times in the early days, that was to apply just selected patches from
mob to master and then reset mob, and that "mob-stuff" branch then was
a "for-the-records" collection of not-applied patches.
See also https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2009-12/msg3.html
Incidentally short time before the status of mob has been described as
"completely dysfunctional"
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2009-09/msg8.html
-- gr
The last couple of commits on that branch are listed below.
AFAICS the "warn about incorrect use of output_*" by using an enum did
never end up on mob.
We seem to have --{no-,}whole-archive by now, so that's obsolete i
guess. And the elf-interpreter toggle is in there, too, so that's fine.
Not sure what you would think about the idea i toyed with in "add
--enable-shared, part1". IIRC the idea was to cut down on memory usage
when running many tcc processes or something along those lines.
thanks!
$ git log -n7 origin/mob-stuff
commit bfa394dab88cb417bb540c32647f04d08e9838af (origin/mob-stuff)
Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Date: Wed Sep 2 15:55:48 2009 +0200
Move bounds-checking code to a bcheck.a
... to avoid undefined references to __bound_new_region()
(when using a libtcc1_s.so instead of libtcc1.a) on i386.
Signed-off-by: aldot
commit a39d055d0e666b152df87b4a603c670c3af37d68
Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Date: Wed Sep 2 15:55:48 2009 +0200
Handle --whole-archive
Support and document -Wl,--{no-,}whole-archive.
Signed-off-by: aldot
commit f0e8b23d02a4c06789b4b8876c65866a237ce570
Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Date: Tue Sep 1 13:32:34 2009 +0200
Implement -m{uclibc,glibc} to choose elf_interp
Support -muclibc and -mglibc (default) to choose between the elf
interpreter like gcc does.
$ ./tcc -o hi-glibc hello.c
$ ./tcc -muclibc -o hi-uclibc hello.c
$ readelf -l hi-* | egrep "(^File: | interpreter)"
File: hi-glibc
[Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-linux.so.2]
File: hi-uclibc
[Requesting program interpreter: /lib/ld-uClibc.so.0]
Signed-off-by: aldot
commit 83cb1364a606fa9fbff450a65ab68e09a5bb4e42
Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Date: Wed Sep 2 12:03:51 2009 +0200
Revert "add --enable-shared, part1"
This reverts commit 9257c5221ea4f095d813082716f786c6c5d23321.
Signed-off-by: aldot
commit d90eb2008b62d19f70bdd14bdf9d784b8789da5d
Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Date: Tue Sep 1 17:04:42 2009 +0200
add --enable-shared, part1
Build a libtcc.so and link the tcc binary against it.
Signed-off-by: aldot
commit 8a555345e3faa37ff0b2c0b84ae1f42358400923
Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Date: Tue Sep 1 14:27:41 2009 +0200
warn about incorrect use of output_*
Signed-off-by: aldot
commit 3a40b44938d59b71d0c010579d9bd9f05e7eed46
Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Date: Tue Sep 1 11:52:51 2009 +0200
allow for non-stripped install
Signed-off-by: aldot
___
Tinycc-devel mailing list
Tinycc-devel@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
