RE: Mod_jk + Apache on RHEL3 gives 503 for jsp only
To answer some questions below: Perfectly means it is our production tomcat server. It performs all the functions required and is accessed from the legacy webserver. Getting images from the path http://webserver/PI/image.png. We have no direct access linked to tomcat instances on the their ports. The Tomcat and Webserver will be on the same server. JkShmFile seems to be for unix installs where this resides on RedHat Linux EL3. I can add it if it is required for linux. Jkmount directives are not new but from a 4.1.24 Tomcat and Jk_mod that was upgraded. I will make the changes to be consistent with the deployed version of Tomcat. I have 4 workers setup. 1 points to a running 4.1.24 tomcat supporting an application to be replaced soon I hope. 1 to a separate port on the 4.12.24 tomcat server for one specific application because I was asked to set it up that way. 1 to the current production tomcat server. And one that is for testing and uses the same settings as the production but I can edit and change as I need to make things work. I am a bit frustrated as I have not done much to make things break. I copied the config files and edited the httpd.conf to be consistent with the legacy install. This is the only part that does not work. If Apache's DocumentRoot does not correspond to Tomcat's appBase, then any static files contained in the application will not be served by Apache without some more Apache configuration changes. Can you give me an example of this? -Original Message- From: Mark Eggers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 10:54 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Mod_jk + Apache on RHEL3 gives 503 for jsp only --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9 installed and working properly on the new server. It is perfectly accessible from the legacy web server. By perfectly accessible you mean . . . ? The main page, home.jsp, loads fine in the servlet if no page is given. http://webserver/PI/ The home.jsp spawns a 503 if is in the URL. http://webserver/PI/home.jsp I can successfully get images from the page from the tomcat instance. It does not like the .jsp extension. By successfully getting images, do you mean: http://webserver/PI/image.png or http://tomcatserver:8080/PI/image.png I have watched in Ethereal as no traffic goes from the apache to the tomcat. I have tried using the loopback and local network address. Why? Is this Tomcat instance on the same server? #INSERT OF TOMCAT CONF PARAMETERS # Load mod_jk module # LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so LoadModule jk_module /etc/httpd/modules/mod_jk.so # Declare the module for IfModule directive #AddModule mod_jk.c # Where to find workers.properties JkWorkersFile /etc/httpd/conf/workers.properties # Where to put jk logs JkLogFile /var/log/httpd/mod_jk.log # Set the jk log level [debug/error/info] JkLogLevel debug # Select the log format JkLogStampFormat [%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] # JkOptions indicate to send SSL KEY SIZE, JkOptions +ForwardKeySize +ForwardURICompat -ForwardDirectories # JkRequestLogFormat set the request format JkRequestLogFormat %w %V %T I don't see the specification for JkShmFile # Send servlet for context /examples to worker named worker1 JkMount /examples/servlet/* worker1 The above should be: JkMount /servlets-examples/servlet/* worker1 JkMount /PI/* worker3 #JkMount /PI/*.jsp worker3 Why are you using worker3 here? # Send JSPs for context /examples to worker named worker1 JkMount /examples/*.jsp worker1 The above shoould be /jsp-examples/*.jsp worker1 JkMount /journals/*.jsp worker1 Worker Properties /etc/httpd/conf/workers.properties # Define some properties workers.apache_log=/var/log/httpd/ workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9 workers.java_home=/usr/bin/java ps=/ # worker.list=worker1 According to the documentation this should contain a comma separated list of all the workers. However, if you're going to the same Tomcat instance all the time, you'll only need one worker definition # Set properties for worker1 (ajp13) worker.worker1.type=ajp13 worker.worker1.host=172.20.1.19 worker.worker1.port=8009 First of all, there should only be one worker list. Second of all, why do you have multiple workers going to the same host but different ports? Do you have multiple Tomcats running on this host? # worker.list=worker2 # Set properties for worker2 (ajp13) worker.worker2.type=ajp13 worker.worker2.host=172.20.1.19 worker.worker2.port=10009 # worker.list=worker3 # Set properties for worker3 (ajp13) worker.worker3.type=ajp13 worker.worker3.host=127.0.0.1 worker.worker3.port=8099 # worker.list=worker4 # Set properties for worker4 (ajp13) worker.worker4.type=ajp13 worker.worker4.host=172.20.1.19 worker.worker4.port=8099 Even after all that is done, there are some other issues when connecting Apache httpd
RE: Mod_jk + Apache on RHEL3 gives 503 for jsp only
Here's a quick writeup. This is going to be a long reply, and I hope it will be useful. I am using Fedora Core 4 as a model. I hope it will be close enough to RHEL 3 to be useful. You may have to change paths in order to correspond to your environment. First of all, my environment: Hardware/OS === Dell 8200 with 768 MB memory Dual boot: Fedora Core 4 2.6.13-1.1526_FC4 Windows 2000 Professional Software Java 1.5.0_4 from Sun Apache 2.0.54 from RPM Tomcat 5.5.9 from jakarta.apache.org mod_jk 1.2.14.1 from source Installation Java 1.5.0_4 is installed in /usr/jdk1.5.0_04 and soft linked to /usr/java JAVA_HOME is set in /etc/profile $JAVA_HOME/bin is placed in $PATH before /usr/bin I've left the Apache RPM install alone, which means the following: DocumentRoot /var/www Logs /etc/logs soft linked to /var/log/httpd modules /etc/modules soft linked to /usr/lib/httpd/modules conf /etc/conf /etc/conf.d I've created a tomcat user with the same group membership as apache user. The home directory is /home/tomcat. /home/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9 Current Tomcat installation Configuration = workers.properties -- I've placed workers.properties in /etc/httpd/conf # # basic worker list # worker.list=local,status # # one to serve the applications # worker.local.type=ajp13 worker.local.host=localhost worker.local.port=8009 # # one to check the status # worker.status.type=status worker.status.host=localhost worker.status.port=8009 This is all you really need in order to connect a local Apache to a local Tomcat. I cannot think of a good reason to define more workers. That isn't to say that there aren't any. server.xml -- If you put multiple workers going to the same host and different ports, then you will have to modify server.xml. Basically, you will have to add a connector statement for each unique port that you use in your workers.properties file. You have two different ports, so you will need two connector statements. Connector port=10009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 protocol=AJP/1.3 / Connector port=8099 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8643 protocol=AJP/1.3 / jk.conf --- I'm following the examples used by Fedora Core 4 in configuring other add-on modules for Apache. You can place the mod_jk configuration information directly in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf, but I've chosen to create a separate file in /etc/httpd/conf.d The contents of my file are as follows: # # following Fedora's add-on philosophy # LoadModulejk_module modules/mod_jk.so JkWorkersFile /etc/httpd/conf/workers.properties JkLogFile logs/mod_jk.log JkLogLevelwarn JkLogStampFormat [%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] JkShmFile logs/shm-file # # jk status # JkMount /jk-status/ status httpd.conf -- Static File Problem --- This is where the configuration can become a little more complex. It helps to understand how Apache finds files to serve. Each host in Apache has a DocumentRoot. In Redhat Fedora, the line that defines that reads: DocumentRoot /var/www/html That means that when you enter the following URL: http://localhost/application/ Apache will look for the DirectoryIndex files (usually index.html) in: /var/www/html/application/ This is fine until you add an application server into the mix. Many people package up the entire application into one war file. This means that all static as well as dynamic content gets loaded into the application server area. In your case, that's /usr/local/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/webapps Apache will know absolutely nothing about this directory, and any files that are not mapped by JkMount and served by Tomcat will not be found by Apache Static File Solutions - 1. Change DocumentRoot The most global change is to change DocumentRoot. In order for this to work, all files in /usr/local/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/webapps must be readable by the user that runs Apache (typically apache in a Redhat distribution). The way to do this is to put the following as your DocumentRoot statement. DocumentRoot /usr/local/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat/webapps While this works, it means that you will have to place all web sites in this location, even if they do not have dynamic content. In general, I don't like this solution. 2. Add Directory and Alias Statements Traditionally locating static files in a dynamic web site has been done by using a combination of Directory and Alias directives. The Directory directive grants appropriate server permissions (who gets to see the files, etc.) and the Alias directive matches a directory with a base URL. For example, here's one way to map application1 living in /usr/local/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat/5.5.9/webapps/application1. # # This goes in httpd.conf # Directory /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/application1/ Options Indexes
Re: Mod_jk + Apache on RHEL3 gives 503 for jsp only
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9 installed and working properly on the new server. It is perfectly accessible from the legacy web server. By perfectly accessible you mean . . . ? The main page, home.jsp, loads fine in the servlet if no page is given. http://webserver/PI/ The home.jsp spawns a 503 if is in the URL. http://webserver/PI/home.jsp I can successfully get images from the page from the tomcat instance. It does not like the .jsp extension. By successfully getting images, do you mean: http://webserver/PI/image.png or http://tomcatserver:8080/PI/image.png I have watched in Ethereal as no traffic goes from the apache to the tomcat. I have tried using the loopback and local network address. Why? Is this Tomcat instance on the same server? #INSERT OF TOMCAT CONF PARAMETERS # Load mod_jk module # LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so LoadModule jk_module /etc/httpd/modules/mod_jk.so # Declare the module for IfModule directive #AddModule mod_jk.c # Where to find workers.properties JkWorkersFile /etc/httpd/conf/workers.properties # Where to put jk logs JkLogFile /var/log/httpd/mod_jk.log # Set the jk log level [debug/error/info] JkLogLevel debug # Select the log format JkLogStampFormat [%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] # JkOptions indicate to send SSL KEY SIZE, JkOptions +ForwardKeySize +ForwardURICompat -ForwardDirectories # JkRequestLogFormat set the request format JkRequestLogFormat %w %V %T I don't see the specification for JkShmFile # Send servlet for context /examples to worker named worker1 JkMount /examples/servlet/* worker1 The above should be: JkMount /servlets-examples/servlet/* worker1 JkMount /PI/* worker3 #JkMount /PI/*.jsp worker3 Why are you using worker3 here? # Send JSPs for context /examples to worker named worker1 JkMount /examples/*.jsp worker1 The above shoould be /jsp-examples/*.jsp worker1 JkMount /journals/*.jsp worker1 Worker Properties /etc/httpd/conf/workers.properties # Define some properties workers.apache_log=/var/log/httpd/ workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/tomcat/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9 workers.java_home=/usr/bin/java ps=/ # worker.list=worker1 According to the documentation this should contain a comma separated list of all the workers. However, if you're going to the same Tomcat instance all the time, you'll only need one worker definition # Set properties for worker1 (ajp13) worker.worker1.type=ajp13 worker.worker1.host=172.20.1.19 worker.worker1.port=8009 First of all, there should only be one worker list. Second of all, why do you have multiple workers going to the same host but different ports? Do you have multiple Tomcats running on this host? # worker.list=worker2 # Set properties for worker2 (ajp13) worker.worker2.type=ajp13 worker.worker2.host=172.20.1.19 worker.worker2.port=10009 # worker.list=worker3 # Set properties for worker3 (ajp13) worker.worker3.type=ajp13 worker.worker3.host=127.0.0.1 worker.worker3.port=8099 # worker.list=worker4 # Set properties for worker4 (ajp13) worker.worker4.type=ajp13 worker.worker4.host=172.20.1.19 worker.worker4.port=8099 Even after all that is done, there are some other issues when connecting Apache httpd and Tomcat. If Apache's DocumentRoot does not correspond to Tomcat's appBase, then any static files contained in the application will not be served by Apache without some more Apache configuration changes. There are several ways of accomplishing this, using the Directory directive and Aliases or JkAutoAlias in Apache's httpd.conf. /mde/ __ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mod_jk setup problems
Thanks Mark, I this helped a lot ... I'll insert comments as well... ;) Mark Eggers wrote: A couple of things here. I'll try to insert comment where appropriate. --- Don Boling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't seem to get anything to successfully pass though the mod_jk connector to the webapp. What version of mod_jk? mod_jk 1.2.14 My mod_jk.conf , workers.properties are as follows. $ less mod_jk.conf # JkWorkersFile /usr/local/etc/apache/workers.properties JkLogFile /var/log/jk.log JkLogLevel debug Later versions of mod_jk need JkShmFile on UNIX. I removed the loadbalance setting... do I still need this? I have not seen any reference as to what this should be set to. JkMount /*.jsp worker1 JkMount /servlet/* worker1 JkMount /examples/* worker1 JkMount /docstore worker1 JkMount /docstore/* worker1 My installs of Tomcat on Linux and Windows do not have an examples web application. I have /jsp-examples and a /servlets-examples contexts. You might try: JkMount /jsp-examples/*.jsp worker1 JkMount /servlet-examples/servlet/* worker1 I corrected these, thanks for pointing those out... I don't know what your other applications are, but I'll comment on a general setup in a bit. # Define 1 real worker using ajp13 worker.list=worker1 # Set properties for worker1 (ajp13) worker.worker1.type=ajp13 worker.worker1.host=localhost worker.worker1.port=8009 worker.worker1.lbfactor=50 worker.worker1.cachesize=10 worker.worker1.cache_timeout=600 worker.worker1.socket_keepalive=1 worker.worker1.reclycle_timeout=300 You probably don't need worker.worker1.lbfactor since you're not using load balancing. Recycle (worker.worker1.reclycle_timeout) needs to be spelled correctly. oops, thanks ... new mod_jk.conf is ... $ less mod_jk.conf # JkWorkersFile /usr/local/etc/apache/workers.properties JkLogFile /var/log/jk.log JkLogLevel debug VirtualHost localhost ServerName localhost # Sample JkMounts. Replace these with the paths you would # like to mount from your JSP server. JkMount /*.jsp worker1 JkMount /servlet-examples/servlet/* worker1 JkMount /jsp-examples/*.jsp worker1 JkMount /docstore worker1 JkMount /docstore/* worker1 /VirtualHost mod_jk.conf (END) [Lots of log stuff deleted] With the exceptin of docstore, I did not see anything that matched your JkMount statements. Since there was no match, no requests were forwarded. In general, you will probably not have $CATALINA_HOME/webapps and Apache's DocumentRoot ovelapping each other. Since they don't overlap, Apache will not know anything about static files (html, css, etc.) that live in $CATALINA_HOME/webapps. You can use Directory and Alias directives in Apache to set up access and map the directory into a URI space that Apache knows about. With later versions of mod_jk, you can use JkAutoAlias to map directories for you. From the documentation at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/config/apache.html JkAutoAlias /opt/tomcat/webapps Then you can use JkMount to map certain requests (*.jsp, /*/servlet/*). JkMount /jsp-examples/*.jsp worker1 The value of JkAutoAlias appears to be prepended to the JkMount directive to find the physical location. I've not used JkAutoAlias, but this appears to be a nice alternative to Directory and Alias directives in httpd.conf. I am trying the JkAutoAlias route ... almost there. In short: 1. Add JkShmFile to httpd.conf 2. Remove lbfactor from workers.properties 3. Change the spelling of recycle 4. Use JkAutoAlias or Directory / Alias directives to put the appropriate directories within Apache's document and URI space. I hope that gets you up and running. /mde/ I have it running now with 'less' errors in jk.log ... I have noticed that 8080 is not responding any more if I just try to hit TC directly so I think, correct me if I'm wrong... this won't work even if setup correctly, until I fix that. Thanks again, Don - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mod_jk setup problems
Glad I was able to help a little bit. In my experience (Linux,Solaris,Win/2K), 8080 should always work if you have the Connector configured. If you can't get to http://localhost:8080/jsp-examples/ running, then there is something else amiss. In your httpd.conf file, I still didn't see something like the following: JkShmFile /var/log/memory.shm This wasn't necessary in 1.2.6 and may not be necessary in 1.2.14, but according to the documentation it's used on UNIX platforms. In workers.properties lbfactor is used to set the relative weight of a worker when you're doing load balancing. Since you're not doing load balancing, letting it default to 1 should be fine. You have two JkMounts for docstore. I'm thinking that only: JkMount /docstore/* worker1 is necessary. If the entire web application (including static files) lives in $CATALINA_HOME/webapps, then the Apache process will need access to those directories and files. Finally, a long time ago the order of startup was important. I think it was Tomcat first, then Apache. It's been a while, and right now I'm on the Windows side of this machine so I can't check. The order of startup issue went away with Apache 2.0.x, but it may still be an issue with your environment (Apache 1.3.x). I would be interested in seeing your error logs from mod_jk as well as seeing what catalina.out has in it when you try to get to a web application via port 8080. Hope this gives you some avenues to explore. /mde/ __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mod_jk setup problems
A couple of things here. I'll try to insert comment where appropriate. --- Don Boling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't seem to get anything to successfully pass though the mod_jk connector to the webapp. What version of mod_jk? My mod_jk.conf , workers.properties are as follows. $ less mod_jk.conf # JkWorkersFile /usr/local/etc/apache/workers.properties JkLogFile /var/log/jk.log JkLogLevel debug Later versions of mod_jk need JkShmFile on UNIX. JkMount /*.jsp worker1 JkMount /servlet/* worker1 JkMount /examples/* worker1 JkMount /docstore worker1 JkMount /docstore/* worker1 My installs of Tomcat on Linux and Windows do not have an examples web application. I have /jsp-examples and a /servlets-examples contexts. You might try: JkMount /jsp-examples/*.jsp worker1 JkMount /servlet-examples/servlet/* worker1 I don't know what your other applications are, but I'll comment on a general setup in a bit. # Define 1 real worker using ajp13 worker.list=worker1 # Set properties for worker1 (ajp13) worker.worker1.type=ajp13 worker.worker1.host=localhost worker.worker1.port=8009 worker.worker1.lbfactor=50 worker.worker1.cachesize=10 worker.worker1.cache_timeout=600 worker.worker1.socket_keepalive=1 worker.worker1.reclycle_timeout=300 You probably don't need worker.worker1.lbfactor since you're not using load balancing. Recycle (worker.worker1.reclycle_timeout) needs to be spelled correctly. [Lots of log stuff deleted] With the exceptin of docstore, I did not see anything that matched your JkMount statements. Since there was no match, no requests were forwarded. In general, you will probably not have $CATALINA_HOME/webapps and Apache's DocumentRoot ovelapping each other. Since they don't overlap, Apache will not know anything about static files (html, css, etc.) that live in $CATALINA_HOME/webapps. You can use Directory and Alias directives in Apache to set up access and map the directory into a URI space that Apache knows about. With later versions of mod_jk, you can use JkAutoAlias to map directories for you. From the documentation at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/config/apache.html JkAutoAlias /opt/tomcat/webapps Then you can use JkMount to map certain requests (*.jsp, /*/servlet/*). JkMount /jsp-examples/*.jsp worker1 The value of JkAutoAlias appears to be prepended to the JkMount directive to find the physical location. I've not used JkAutoAlias, but this appears to be a nice alternative to Directory and Alias directives in httpd.conf. In short: 1. Add JkShmFile to httpd.conf 2. Remove lbfactor from workers.properties 3. Change the spelling of recycle 4. Use JkAutoAlias or Directory / Alias directives to put the appropriate directories within Apache's document and URI space. I hope that gets you up and running. /mde/ __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk performance
Hi Peter, That is why I mentioned it. We deliver our static content from other servers, and had originally considered hiding our TCs behind apache for 'security reasons'. After seeing the speed difference, and the fact that their isn't really a security difference if you just push all the traffic straight through anyway, we decided not to put Apache between our users and our Tomcat servers. If I didn't need to use re-writes, and complicated rules on our apaches, I would also use THTTP for performance reasons. Andrew On Sep 16, 2005, at 3:39 PM, Peter Flynn wrote: OK, that's useful information. But I have 300,000+ static HTML files to server, and about 10 JSP files. I'm surely not switching my entire server to Tomcat...:-) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tomcat directory protection (was: Re: mod_jk performance
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 13:29, Hassan Schroeder wrote: KEREM ERKAN wrote: Apache has better directory/file restricting and handling than Tomcat better in what way? What actual *security* issue are we talking about -- in other words, what exploit is Tomcat susceptible to that Apache is not? I don't know if Kerem Erkan was talking about exploits, but I have looked for some facility in Tomcat equivalent to Apache .htaccess files and failed to find any mention of them. Is it possible to do this kind of IP-level or simple username/password restriction in Tomcat? ///Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk performance
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 13:50, Andrew Miehs wrote: We did some comparisons between running Tomcat 5.0 standalone, or TC 5.0 and Apache 2.0 If you are ONLY delivering JSPs, we found that we could only deal with 50% of the requests when running combined Apache TC and mod_jk OK, that's useful information. But I have 300,000+ static HTML files to server, and about 10 JSP files. I'm surely not switching my entire server to Tomcat...:-) ///Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk performance
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 18:52, Mark Thomas wrote: KEREM ERKAN wrote: Tomcat is harder to configure and -sadly- it has a far worse documentation than Apache (for now). I look forward to seeing your documentation patches in Bugzilla ;) I will certainly document how to fix my problem once it's fixed, but anything I have ever sent to Bugzilla either gets ignored or argued about ad infinitum and nothing ever done, so any doc I write will go on my blog or my web site (from where anyone is free to take/copy it). ///Peter - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk performance
-Original Message- From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 8:53 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk performance KEREM ERKAN wrote: Tomcat is harder to configure and -sadly- it has a far worse documentation than Apache (for now). I look forward to seeing your documentation patches in Bugzilla ;) Mark I would really love to. As soon as I get more experience on Tomcat (I work with Tomcat for approx. 6-7 months), I will try to contribute a little. ;) Don't get me wrong, but Tomcat documentation is not very explanatory and does not have many examples for a newbie to get his hands on Tomcat easily. Cheers, Kerem
RE: mod_jk performance
Well I tried both, and as my websites do not have a very high traffic (I have approximately a total of 50 GB per month) the speed is not primarily a concern to me, I am looking to the security side of the problem and Apache+mod_jk does its job better than only Tomcat concerning security. I have stress tested Apache+Tomcat and only Tomcat and it seems like %30 is too high. I can suggest using mod_jk 1.2.10 with Tomcat 5.5.9, surprisingly you get very similar results. Mod_jk 1.2.10 had some performance problems but I did not thoroughly test why. I hope this may help a little. Cheers, Kerem -Original Message- From: marc ratun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:47 PM To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: mod_jk performance Hi, I just read an article about webapp benchmarks [1] and they mentioned that apache+mod_jk+tomcat is about 30% slower than pure tomcat. This is sad. Until now I believed that the performance decrease with apache/mod_jk would be marginal. Putting apache/mod_jk before tomcat is very nice. I don't want to miss it because it is a good way to integrate other modules. Is there any way to speed up apache/tomcat cooperation? Marc [1] (german only) http://www.heise.de/ix/artikel/2005/10/124/ _ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk performance
Marc If the performance of your app is not acceptable using mod_jk , you could try other alternatives and still keep apache in front to serve static content and use other modules. You can use apache mod_proxy to forward request on 8080 [or whatever your run tomcat on] to tomcat without going through mod_jk There are pros and cons to take this approach, but it may suffice in your case. Hope it helps. Bruno Georges Glencore International AG Tel. +41 41 709 3204 Fax +41 41 709 3000 marc ratun [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org ail.com cc: Subject: mod_jk performance 14.09.05 13:46 Please respond Distribute: to Tomcat Users Personal? |---| List| [ ] x | |---| Hi, I just read an article about webapp benchmarks [1] and they mentioned that apache+mod_jk+tomcat is about 30% slower than pure tomcat. This is sad. Until now I believed that the performance decrease with apache/mod_jk would be marginal. Putting apache/mod_jk before tomcat is very nice. I don't want to miss it because it is a good way to integrate other modules. Is there any way to speed up apache/tomcat cooperation? Marc [1] (german only) http://www.heise.de/ix/artikel/2005/10/124/ _ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL DISCLAIMER. The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message and delete this e-mail from your system. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk performance
AFAIK mod_proxy performs worse than mod_jk. Just my 2 cents. Kerem -Original Message- From: Bruno Georges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:58 PM To: Tomcat Users List Cc: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_jk performance Marc If the performance of your app is not acceptable using mod_jk , you could try other alternatives and still keep apache in front to serve static content and use other modules. You can use apache mod_proxy to forward request on 8080 [or whatever your run tomcat on] to tomcat without going through mod_jk There are pros and cons to take this approach, but it may suffice in your case. Hope it helps. Bruno Georges Glencore International AG Tel. +41 41 709 3204 Fax +41 41 709 3000 marc ratun [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org ail.com cc: Subject: mod_jk performance 14.09.05 13:46 Please respond Distribute: to Tomcat Users Personal? |---| List | [ ] x | |---| Hi, I just read an article about webapp benchmarks [1] and they mentioned that apache+mod_jk+tomcat is about 30% slower than pure tomcat. This is sad. Until now I believed that the performance decrease with apache/mod_jk would be marginal. Putting apache/mod_jk before tomcat is very nice. I don't want to miss it because it is a good way to integrate other modules. Is there any way to speed up apache/tomcat cooperation? Marc [1] (german only) http://www.heise.de/ix/artikel/2005/10/124/ _ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL DISCLAIMER. The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message and delete this e-mail from your system. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk performance
marc ratun wrote: Hi, I just read an article about webapp benchmarks [1] and they mentioned that apache+mod_jk+tomcat is about 30% slower than pure tomcat. This is sad. Until now I believed that the performance decrease with apache/mod_jk would be marginal. Why would that be sad? 30% performance decrease still offers you a 300% performance increase over CGI or mod_proxy. Since you decided to use mod_jk that uses AJP protocol for both binary HTTP and constant connection pool, you have also the load balancer capabilities that will allow you to either segment or double your backend application servers. Thus with two backend servers you will have both speed increase and failover over a single box implementation. OTOH if you just wish Apache with all the goodies, but with Servlet support, then 30% performance decrease is very much acceptable thought. If OTOH you don't need legacy Apache modules, use Tomcat 5.5 with Native support that will both outperform any Apache httpd server (and most others) for both for dynamic and static content. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk performance
KEREM ERKAN wrote: ... I am looking to the security side of the problem and Apache+mod_jk does its job better than only Tomcat concerning security. How so? -- Hassan Schroeder - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webtuitive Design === (+1) 408-938-0567 === http://webtuitive.com dream. code. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk performance
Kerem, You are probably right, I personnaly never faced any issues with any of them. However, Tom can you be more specific about the type of traffic your app has to serve and what are performance/response time requirements. Hardware and network, server and JVM configuration can also be either a bottleneck or a way to improve the overall performance of your syste. Ideally, when you have metrics on the different parts of the systems it is easier to tune . Bruno Georges Glencore International AG Tel. +41 41 709 3204 Fax +41 41 709 3000 KEREM ERKAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Tomcat Users List' tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org ari.com.tr cc: Subject: RE: mod_jk performance 14.09.05 14:00 Please respond Distribute: to Tomcat Users Personal? |---| List| [ ] x | |---| AFAIK mod_proxy performs worse than mod_jk. Just my 2 cents. Kerem -Original Message- From: Bruno Georges [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 2:58 PM To: Tomcat Users List Cc: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_jk performance Marc If the performance of your app is not acceptable using mod_jk , you could try other alternatives and still keep apache in front to serve static content and use other modules. You can use apache mod_proxy to forward request on 8080 [or whatever your run tomcat on] to tomcat without going through mod_jk There are pros and cons to take this approach, but it may suffice in your case. Hope it helps. Bruno Georges Glencore International AG Tel. +41 41 709 3204 Fax +41 41 709 3000 marc ratun [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org ail.com cc: Subject: mod_jk performance 14.09.05 13:46 Please respond Distribute: to Tomcat Users Personal? |---| List | [ ] x | |---| Hi, I just read an article about webapp benchmarks [1] and they mentioned that apache+mod_jk+tomcat is about 30% slower than pure tomcat. This is sad. Until now I believed that the performance decrease with apache/mod_jk would be marginal. Putting apache/mod_jk before tomcat is very nice. I don't want to miss it because it is a good way to integrate other modules. Is there any way to speed up apache/tomcat cooperation? Marc [1] (german only) http://www.heise.de/ix/artikel/2005/10/124/ _ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] LEGAL DISCLAIMER. The contents of this e-mail and any attachments are strictly confidential and they may not be used or disclosed by someone who is not a named recipient. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this email inserting the word misdirected as the message and delete this e-mail from your system. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: mod_jk performance
Apache has better directory/file restricting and handling than Tomcat, it is more customizable and it is much user/admin friendly to configure :-) (at least for me) I configure all security related stuff on Apache and have my Tomcat listen only on AJP connector with 127.0.0.1:8009. Tomcat is harder to configure and -sadly- it has a far worse documentation than Apache (for now). Best regards, Kerem -Original Message- From: Hassan Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 3:13 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk performance KEREM ERKAN wrote: ... I am looking to the security side of the problem and Apache+mod_jk does its job better than only Tomcat concerning security. How so? -- Hassan Schroeder - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webtuitive Design === (+1) 408-938-0567 === http://webtuitive.com dream. code. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk performance
Apache is easier to configure, but at a 50% performance hit for pure JSP pages Andrew On Sep 14, 2005, at 2:18 PM, KEREM ERKAN wrote: Apache has better directory/file restricting and handling than Tomcat, it is more customizable and it is much user/admin friendly to configure :-) (at least for me) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk performance
KEREM ERKAN wrote: Apache has better directory/file restricting and handling than Tomcat better in what way? What actual *security* issue are we talking about -- in other words, what exploit is Tomcat susceptible to that Apache is not? -- Hassan Schroeder - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Webtuitive Design === (+1) 408-938-0567 === http://webtuitive.com dream. code. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk performance
-Original Message- From: Hassan Schroeder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 3:30 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk performance KEREM ERKAN wrote: Apache has better directory/file restricting and handling than Tomcat better in what way? What actual *security* issue are we talking about -- in other words, what exploit is Tomcat susceptible to that Apache is not? I am not aware of any critical exploits Apache or Tomcat have. As I said, I only think about restricting access to some of my server files. You may be able to do this with Tomcat but from my point of view, it is harder to configure. That's all. Cheers, Kerem smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: mod_jk performance
I use Apache/mod_jk/Tomcat for a long time on production servers with load balancing/failover (and with high traffic sites) and I'm sure it's not 30% slower than a pure Tomcat. I use Apache to deliver static files, manage SSL and other apache specifics modules. Then, Tomcat only manage dynamics requests (servlets and JSPs) without SSL. With this distribution of the functions, the Tomcat is less stressed and its performances increase. And when the Tomcat load increase, I add a Tomcat in the cluster... So, I think it's a good way to use it. On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:46:51 + marc ratun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I just read an article about webapp benchmarks [1] and they mentioned that apache+mod_jk+tomcat is about 30% slower than pure tomcat. This is sad. Until now I believed that the performance decrease with apache/mod_jk would be marginal. Putting apache/mod_jk before tomcat is very nice. I don't want to miss it because it is a good way to integrate other modules. Is there any way to speed up apache/tomcat cooperation? Marc [1] (german only) http://www.heise.de/ix/artikel/2005/10/124/ _ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk performance
We did some comparisons between running Tomcat 5.0 standalone, or TC 5.0 and Apache 2.0 If you are ONLY delivering JSPs, we found that we could only deal with 50% of the requests when running combined Apache TC and mod_jk Andrew On Sep 14, 2005, at 2:45 PM, Lionel Farbos wrote: I use Apache/mod_jk/Tomcat for a long time on production servers with load balancing/failover (and with high traffic sites) and I'm sure it's not 30% slower than a pure Tomcat. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk performance
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:55:08 +0300 KEREM ERKAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mod_jk 1.2.10 had some performance problems but I did not thoroughly test why. Is is proved ? Where do you find this ? I tested mod_jk 1.2.14 (but not stressed it) and it seems to be a good version... What sort of performance problems do you mention ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk performance
But, in a web site, there is never only JSPs : there is a lot of static files (images, css, js, ...) So, if you don't have a apache in the frontend to deliver theses static files, there is an overload for the TC server... So, your tests stressed only light JSPs or a real site ? and what is your solution for load-balancing/failover ? On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:50:52 +0200 Andrew Miehs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We did some comparisons between running Tomcat 5.0 standalone, or TC 5.0 and Apache 2.0 If you are ONLY delivering JSPs, we found that we could only deal with 50% of the requests when running combined Apache TC and mod_jk Andrew On Sep 14, 2005, at 2:45 PM, Lionel Farbos wrote: I use Apache/mod_jk/Tomcat for a long time on production servers with load balancing/failover (and with high traffic sites) and I'm sure it's not 30% slower than a pure Tomcat. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk performance
We run F5 BigIPs as our loadbalancers, and have seperated images, etc onto another server IE: i.domain.com for images, and www.domain.com for dynamic content. F5 provides a feature call iRules to do the splitting between hosts for you, but I would NOT use this on a high traffic site. Andrew On Sep 14, 2005, at 2:58 PM, Lionel Farbos wrote: But, in a web site, there is never only JSPs : there is a lot of static files (images, css, js, ...) So, if you don't have a apache in the frontend to deliver theses static files, there is an overload for the TC server... So, your tests stressed only light JSPs or a real site ? and what is your solution for load-balancing/failover ? On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:50:52 +0200 Andrew Miehs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk performance
Well, mod_jk 1.2.10 seems slower than 1.2.10 when stress tested. The tests completed in more time. I do not have the actual test results, because we have been using 1.2.10 for several months, maybe I can send them when I test 1.2.14. By the way mod_jk site mentions 1.2.13 as its testing version. Is there a 1.2.14 really or did you write 14 by mistake? Cheers, Kerem -Original Message- From: Lionel Farbos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 3:51 PM To: Tomcat Users List Cc: KEREM ERKAN Subject: Re: mod_jk performance On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:55:08 +0300 KEREM ERKAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mod_jk 1.2.10 had some performance problems but I did not thoroughly test why. Is is proved ? Where do you find this ? I tested mod_jk 1.2.14 (but not stressed it) and it seems to be a good version... What sort of performance problems do you mention ?
Re: mod_jk performance
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:16:59 +0300 KEREM ERKAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, mod_jk 1.2.10 seems slower than 1.2.10 when stress tested. The tests completed in more time. I do not have the actual test results, because we have been using 1.2.10 for several months, maybe I can send them when I test 1.2.14. I'm interested in such tests (or a link if it exists). By the way mod_jk site mentions 1.2.13 as its testing version. Is there a 1.2.14 really or did you write 14 by mistake? I wanted to say mod_jk 1.2.14 : it's not a mistake... but I don't understand what this meens ...?!? I receive this mail (see Announce_mod_jk_1.2.14 above) on July 26th and, at this date, the mod_jk site mentioned 1.2.14 as the latest and stable version (you can see the content of this version on the changelog : http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/changelog.html) Now, the mod_jk site mention 1.2.13 as the latest stable version... But the latest source version is : 1.2.14 !!! http://www.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-connectors/jk/source/ So, Mladen, what this means ? What is the current stable version ? - Announce_mod_jk_1.2.14 received on July 26th : - Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:35:01 +0200 List-Post: mailto:announcements@jakarta.apache.org List-Id: Jakarta Announcements List announcements.jakarta.apache.org Reply-To: Jakarta General List general@jakarta.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list announcements@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 226 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jul 2005 21:26:36 - Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:26:31 +0200 From: Jean-frederic Clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041023 X-Accept-Language: en, fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: announcements@jakarta.apache.org, tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org, tomcat-dev@jakarta.apache.org, announce@apache.org Subject: [ANN] Apache Tomcat mod_jk 1.2.14 Web Server Connector released Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org The Apache Tomcat team is pleased to announce the release of version 1.2.14 of the Apache Tomcat mod_jk web server connector. Tomcat is the reference implementation of a web application server which implements the Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages specifications. mod_jk is a connector which allows a web server such as Apache HTTPD to act as a front end to the Tomcat web application server. This version fixes a number of minor bugs. See http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/changelog.html for a complete list of changes. Source distribtions can be downloaded from an Apache Software Foundation mirror at: (they are named jakarta-tomcat-connectors-1.2.14.1-src.tar.gz and jakarta-tomcat-connectors-1.2.14.1-src.zip) http://jakarta.apache.org/site/sourceindex.cgi Binary distributions for a number of different operating systems and web servers can be downloaded from an Apache Software Foundation mirror at: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/binindex.cgi Documentation for using mod_jk with Tomcat 3.3, 4.1, 5.0 and 5.5 can be found at: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/ The Apache Tomcat team. - Cheers, Kerem -Original Message- From: Lionel Farbos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 3:51 PM To: Tomcat Users List Cc: KEREM ERKAN Subject: Re: mod_jk performance On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:55:08 +0300 KEREM ERKAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mod_jk 1.2.10 had some performance problems but I did not thoroughly test why. Is is proved ? Where do you find this ? I tested mod_jk 1.2.14 (but not stressed it) and it seems to be a good version... What sort of performance problems do you mention ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk performance
So, I think your solution with F5 BigIPs-Tomcat is equivalent to the solution with Apache/mod_jk-Tomcat But the last is free and I don't know the difference in performances between the 2 solutions. On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 15:14:01 +0200 Andrew Miehs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We run F5 BigIPs as our loadbalancers, and have seperated images, etc onto another server IE: i.domain.com for images, and www.domain.com for dynamic content. F5 provides a feature call iRules to do the splitting between hosts for you, but I would NOT use this on a high traffic site. Andrew On Sep 14, 2005, at 2:58 PM, Lionel Farbos wrote: But, in a web site, there is never only JSPs : there is a lot of static files (images, css, js, ...) So, if you don't have a apache in the frontend to deliver theses static files, there is an overload for the TC server... So, your tests stressed only light JSPs or a real site ? and what is your solution for load-balancing/failover ? On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 14:50:52 +0200 Andrew Miehs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk performance
Well, mod_jk 1.2.10 seems slower than 1.2.10 when stress tested. The tests completed in more time. I do not have the actual test results, because we have been using 1.2.10 for several months, maybe I can send them when I test 1.2.14. I'm interested in such tests (or a link if it exists). You can try Microsoft's Web Stress Tool which is free but it is old. I am also actually searching for a better stress tool. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=E2C0585A-062A-439E- A67D-75A89AA36495displaylang=en By the way mod_jk site mentions 1.2.13 as its testing version. Is there a 1.2.14 really or did you write 14 by mistake? I wanted to say mod_jk 1.2.14 : it's not a mistake... but I don't understand what this meens ...?!? It seems there is a confusion in mod_jk's own site :-) I will download and compile 1.2.14 in a spare time and see how it performs. Cheers, Kerem smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: mod_jk performance
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:27:29 +0300 KEREM ERKAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, mod_jk 1.2.10 seems slower than 1.2.10 when stress tested. The tests completed in more time. I do not have the actual test results, because we have been using 1.2.10 for several months, maybe I can send them when I test 1.2.14. I'm interested in such tests (or a link if it exists). You can try Microsoft's Web Stress Tool which is free but it is old. I am also actually searching for a better stress tool. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=E2C0585A-062A-439E- A67D-75A89AA36495displaylang=en I don't search a Stress Tool; I say I'm interest in the result of the stress. Another free Stress Tool is JMeter (http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/) Under Linux, I also used httperf (http://www.hpl.hp.com/research/linux/httperf/) and autobench (http://www.xenoclast.org/autobench/) Regards. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk performance
-Original Message- From: Lionel Farbos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2005 5:49 PM To: Tomcat Users List Cc: KEREM ERKAN Subject: Re: mod_jk performance On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 17:27:29 +0300 KEREM ERKAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, mod_jk 1.2.10 seems slower than 1.2.10 when stress tested. The tests completed in more time. I do not have the actual test results, because we have been using 1.2.10 for several months, maybe I can send them when I test 1.2.14. I'm interested in such tests (or a link if it exists). You can try Microsoft's Web Stress Tool which is free but it is old. I am also actually searching for a better stress tool. http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=E2C0585A-062A -439E- A67D-75A89AA36495displaylang=en I don't search a Stress Tool; I say I'm interest in the result of the stress. Well as I said, I do not have the results for now, but when I test 1.2.14, I will surely share the results with the list. Cheers, Kerem smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: mod_jk performance
KEREM ERKAN wrote: Tomcat is harder to configure and -sadly- it has a far worse documentation than Apache (for now). I look forward to seeing your documentation patches in Bugzilla ;) Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk performance
Well since I don't understand German, I don't konw how he tested. However in my stress testing which lots of static and JSPs, I found Apache + mod_jk performance is a littlle higher than TOMCAT only. I configured Apache with mod_cache. So I think only handling JSPs, TC only could be better than Apache + mod_jk. However in the real world, there is never only JSPs, there must have lots of static files. Thx, Xuekun - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk and text/plain
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 06:37:46PM +0300, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote: I have a problem with the application resources, mapped with the JkMount. For some reason httpd server threats the content-type as text/plain, and ignores the text/html set by tomcat. any ideas how to get rid of that? Tomcat 4.1.31, mod_jk 1.2.14.1, Apache httpd 1.3 Defaultcontent is commented out in the httpd.conf I added .htaccess file with the DefaultType text/html to the WEB application root, and everything seems to work fine now. Also I have servlet mapping to the /some URI path, and it won't work, but after I created empty file some in the root of WEB application - it start to resolve :) A lot of crutches for simply tasks, huh :) -- Eugene N Dzhurinsky - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk: Hot Standby and Load Balance
I believe you can specify the jvmRoute separately by using the domain attribute, but I'm not sure I see how this would help? Byron -Original Message- From: Mott Leroy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:03 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk: Hot Standby and Load Balance Due to some differences in our applications, some of them can be truly load balanced, and some of them really cannot (yet). That is, some of our applications can be (and have been) truly load balanced, and others need (and only allow) simple failover support (hot standby). I noticed that workers now support both possibilities (using disabled and redirect flags to support hot standby). What I'd like to do ultimately is have a hot standby load balancer and as well as a normal load balancer, but it doesn't seem like that's possible. From what I understand, you can really only have 1 load balanced worker per tomcat instance because it must match the jvmRoute of that instance -- having one worker that's disabled and one that's not doesn't seem possible. So if I define a load balance worker as: # traditional load balance worker worker.lb_tala_build.type=ajp13 worker.lb_tala_build.host=tala worker.lb_tala_build.port=8000 worker.lb_tala_build.lbfactor=1 worker.lb_tala_build.socket_keepalive=1 worker.lb_tala_build.recycle_timeout=300 I cannot really define a second load balanced worker like below (b/c no matching jvmRoute) # a hot standby worker based on the worker above worker.lb_tala_build2.type=ajp13 worker.lb_tala_build2.host=tala worker.lb_tala_build2.port=8000 worker.lb_tala_build2.lbfactor=1 worker.lb_tala_build2.socket_keepalive=1 worker.lb_tala_build2.recycle_timeout=300 worker.lb_tala_build2.disabled=True Is anyone familiar with this setup of have any ideas how it could be achieved? (the same problem exists for what would be the Primary server, as it would need a worker that redirects and one that doesn't) Ps - Being able to specify the jvmRoute separately would solve this problem: worker.lb_tala_build2.jvmRoute=lb_tala_build - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk: Hot Standby and Load Balance
Well, I was thinking of using something like (truncated for clarity): # load balanced worker.lb_traditional.type=lb worker.lb_traditional.balance_workers=lb_worker1,lb_worker2 worker.lb_traditional.sticky_session=true # workers 1 and 2 are load balanced worker.lb_worker1.type=ajp13 worker.lb_worker1.host=server1 worker.lb_worker1.domain=theJRMRoute worker.lb_worker2.type=ajp13 worker.lb_worker2.host=server2 worker.lb_worker2.domain=theJRMRoute # standby setup worker.lb_standby.type=lb worker.lb_standby.balance_workers=lb_worker3,lb_worker4 worker.lb_standby.sticky_session=true # workers 4 is hot standby for worker 3 worker.lb_worker3.type=ajp13 worker.lb_worker3.host=server1 worker.lb_worker3.domain=theJRMRoute worker.lb_worker3.redirect=worker4 worker.lb_worker4.type=ajp13 worker.lb_worker4.host=server2 worker.lb_worker4.domain=theJRMRoute worker.lb_worker4.disabled=True Guernsey, Byron (GE Consumer Industrial) wrote: I believe you can specify the jvmRoute separately by using the domain attribute, but I'm not sure I see how this would help? Byron -Original Message- From: Mott Leroy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:03 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk: Hot Standby and Load Balance Due to some differences in our applications, some of them can be truly load balanced, and some of them really cannot (yet). That is, some of our applications can be (and have been) truly load balanced, and others need (and only allow) simple failover support (hot standby). I noticed that workers now support both possibilities (using disabled and redirect flags to support hot standby). What I'd like to do ultimately is have a hot standby load balancer and as well as a normal load balancer, but it doesn't seem like that's possible. From what I understand, you can really only have 1 load balanced worker per tomcat instance because it must match the jvmRoute of that instance -- having one worker that's disabled and one that's not doesn't seem possible. So if I define a load balance worker as: # traditional load balance worker worker.lb_tala_build.type=ajp13 worker.lb_tala_build.host=tala worker.lb_tala_build.port=8000 worker.lb_tala_build.lbfactor=1 worker.lb_tala_build.socket_keepalive=1 worker.lb_tala_build.recycle_timeout=300 I cannot really define a second load balanced worker like below (b/c no matching jvmRoute) # a hot standby worker based on the worker above worker.lb_tala_build2.type=ajp13 worker.lb_tala_build2.host=tala worker.lb_tala_build2.port=8000 worker.lb_tala_build2.lbfactor=1 worker.lb_tala_build2.socket_keepalive=1 worker.lb_tala_build2.recycle_timeout=300 worker.lb_tala_build2.disabled=True Is anyone familiar with this setup of have any ideas how it could be achieved? (the same problem exists for what would be the Primary server, as it would need a worker that redirects and one that doesn't) Ps - Being able to specify the jvmRoute separately would solve this problem: worker.lb_tala_build2.jvmRoute=lb_tala_build - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk: Hot Standby and Load Balance
I think having multiple load balancing workers for the same group of target servers is not a problem. You simply define load balancers e.g. lb1, lb2 etc. Which load balancer is chosen is determined by your JkMount directives. So if you have different apps app1, app2 etc. on your tomcats having incompatible balancing requirements you simply use JkMount /app1/* lb1 JkMount /app2/* lb2 etc. The balanced workers behind lb1, lb2 etc. are allowed to have the same name, because each load balancer has it's own list of balanced workers with associated attributes. I expect no problem from a clash of names of balanced workers in different balancing workers. So there would be no need of having multiple jvmRoute for a single tomcat instance. Well, I was thinking of using something like (truncated for clarity): # load balanced worker.lb_traditional.type=lb worker.lb_traditional.balance_workers=lb_worker1,lb_worker2 worker.lb_traditional.sticky_session=true # workers 1 and 2 are load balanced worker.lb_worker1.type=ajp13 worker.lb_worker1.host=server1 worker.lb_worker1.domain=theJRMRoute worker.lb_worker2.type=ajp13 worker.lb_worker2.host=server2 worker.lb_worker2.domain=theJRMRoute # standby setup worker.lb_standby.type=lb worker.lb_standby.balance_workers=lb_worker3,lb_worker4 worker.lb_standby.sticky_session=true # workers 4 is hot standby for worker 3 worker.lb_worker3.type=ajp13 worker.lb_worker3.host=server1 worker.lb_worker3.domain=theJRMRoute worker.lb_worker3.redirect=worker4 worker.lb_worker4.type=ajp13 worker.lb_worker4.host=server2 worker.lb_worker4.domain=theJRMRoute worker.lb_worker4.disabled=True Guernsey, Byron (GE Consumer Industrial) wrote: I believe you can specify the jvmRoute separately by using the domain attribute, but I'm not sure I see how this would help? Byron -Original Message- From: Mott Leroy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 11:03 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk: Hot Standby and Load Balance Due to some differences in our applications, some of them can be truly load balanced, and some of them really cannot (yet). That is, some of our applications can be (and have been) truly load balanced, and others need (and only allow) simple failover support (hot standby). I noticed that workers now support both possibilities (using disabled and redirect flags to support hot standby). What I'd like to do ultimately is have a hot standby load balancer and as well as a normal load balancer, but it doesn't seem like that's possible. From what I understand, you can really only have 1 load balanced worker per tomcat instance because it must match the jvmRoute of that instance -- having one worker that's disabled and one that's not doesn't seem possible. So if I define a load balance worker as: # traditional load balance worker worker.lb_tala_build.type=ajp13 worker.lb_tala_build.host=tala worker.lb_tala_build.port=8000 worker.lb_tala_build.lbfactor=1 worker.lb_tala_build.socket_keepalive=1 worker.lb_tala_build.recycle_timeout=300 I cannot really define a second load balanced worker like below (b/c no matching jvmRoute) # a hot standby worker based on the worker above worker.lb_tala_build2.type=ajp13 worker.lb_tala_build2.host=tala worker.lb_tala_build2.port=8000 worker.lb_tala_build2.lbfactor=1 worker.lb_tala_build2.socket_keepalive=1 worker.lb_tala_build2.recycle_timeout=300 worker.lb_tala_build2.disabled=True Is anyone familiar with this setup of have any ideas how it could be achieved? (the same problem exists for what would be the Primary server, as it would need a worker that redirects and one that doesn't) Ps - Being able to specify the jvmRoute separately would solve this problem: worker.lb_tala_build2.jvmRoute=lb_tala_build - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk: Hot Standby and Load Balance
Rainer Jung wrote: The balanced workers behind lb1, lb2 etc. are allowed to have the same name, because each load balancer has it's own list of balanced workers with associated attributes. I expect no problem from a clash of names of balanced workers in different balancing workers. I must be missing something obvious here. I am with you on the JKMount part, but I just don't see how the name clash isn't an issue for worker.properties. Simplifying again ... # as per your suggestion ... where worker1 and worker2 are jvmRoutes worker.lb1.balanced_workers=worker1,worker2 worker.lb2.balanced_workers=worker1,worker2 # the balanced workers ... which should they choose ... ? worker.worker1 (failover version) worker.worker1 (not failover version) worker.worker2 (standby version) worker.worker2 (non-standby version) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk: Hot Standby and Load Balance
Of course you are right (and for me it seems to be too late today). So I agree: you either find out how to use different jvmRoutes in a single instance or you try to find a workarounf with the domain attribute: If a load balancer does not find a worker with the correct name (=jvmRoute), it will next use a worker whose domain name is equal to the jvmRoute. But this will not be very efficient, because every request will first look for the correct worker and only after that check for the domain. Also I'm not sure, how this second class worker will behave, if you stopp it with respect to it's redirect etc. attributes. Sorry! Rainer Jung wrote: The balanced workers behind lb1, lb2 etc. are allowed to have the same name, because each load balancer has it's own list of balanced workers with associated attributes. I expect no problem from a clash of names of balanced workers in different balancing workers. I must be missing something obvious here. I am with you on the JKMount part, but I just don't see how the name clash isn't an issue for worker.properties. Simplifying again ... # as per your suggestion ... where worker1 and worker2 are jvmRoutes worker.lb1.balanced_workers=worker1,worker2 worker.lb2.balanced_workers=worker1,worker2 # the balanced workers ... which should they choose ... ? worker.worker1 (failover version) worker.worker1 (not failover version) worker.worker2 (standby version) worker.worker2 (non-standby version) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk Apache Permission Problem
I dunno if it's the same in Apache 1.3, but in Apache 2.x the example httpd.conf file has a pair of small IfModule tags showing how to run Apache under non-root user for diff. OS's. Basically you have to start Apache as root and it will then switch over, or so the example file says. To do this irrespecitve of the modules being present or otherwise, I just deleted the IfModule Tags. K Jeshua Lacock wrote: Greetings, I can't seem to make mod_jk connect successfully with Apache. Apache and Tomcat both works fine on their own (apache on :80 Tomcat on :8080), but I seem to be getting a permissions problem using mod_jk. I am able start Tomcat without special privileges, but when I try and start Apache as a non-privileged user (after starting Tomcat), I get the following error: - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk Apache Permission Problem
On Aug 18, 2005, at 5:45 PM, Kyle wrote: I dunno if it's the same in Apache 1.3, but in Apache 2.x the example httpd.conf file has a pair of small IfModule tags showing how to run Apache under non-root user for diff. OS's. Basically you have to start Apache as root and it will then switch over, or so the example file says. To do this irrespecitve of the modules being present or otherwise, I just deleted the IfModule Tags. Kyle, Thanks for the hint! I changed the user from 'nobody' to 'www', and it now works. Awesome! Thanks a million! Cheers, Jeshua Lacock ___ Programmer/OwnerPhone: 877.240.1364 http://OpenOSX.com Fax:415.462.6211 -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk or jk2??
I thought the jk2 is newer... but I can be wrong... MC From: Luis Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: mod_jk or jk2?? Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:47:42 -0500 Hello everyone, I see lots of posts saying that they are using or implementing jk2? For what I understand, that has been replaced by mod_jk... so which one is better or what is recommended?? I also have found better documentation related to jk2 so that adds to the puzzle. Regards, Luis - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk or jk2??
You want to use mod_jk. JK2 has been deprecated and is no longer in active development. On 8/3/05, MC Moisei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought the jk2 is newer... but I can be wrong... MC From: Luis Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: mod_jk or jk2?? Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:47:42 -0500 Hello everyone, I see lots of posts saying that they are using or implementing jk2? For what I understand, that has been replaced by mod_jk... so which one is better or what is recommended?? I also have found better documentation related to jk2 so that adds to the puzzle. Regards, Luis - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ben Ricker He's just this guy, you know? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk not detecting loss of a load balanced machine
Hi, Is this issue described below familiar to anyone who is really knowledgable of how mod_jk works? Thank you, Edmon Edmon Begoli wrote: We've noticed with two versions of mod_jk we've been using (1.2.5 and one older) that if one of the machines hosting load balanced tomcat gets completely off the network (power loss) mod_jk will seem not to emove that one from the load balanced instances, so the whole site will appear down because mod_jk will I guess try to hit it. I can not say for sure that it is the reason behind the scenes, but I can say for sure that these versions of mod_jk do not respond well to machine losses - which is a pretty possible scenario. My question is - has this been addressed in some of the later releases, and if not is there a workaround? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk - multiple workers for same Tomcat instance?
Any thoughts? From: David Hay [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_jk - multiple workers for same Tomcat instance? Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 15:00:33 -0400 Hi, We have set up several contexts eg one for client requests and one for admin requests, for a set of Tomcat servers, fronted by Apache. We would like to balance them differently, allowing one machine to take most of the admin load. There doesn't seem to be a lbfactor parameter for a loadbalancing worker, so our second option is to create a seperate client and admin worker for each machine, and set their lbfactors separately. Unless you can recommend a better way? If we go down this route, could you explain how to set up two connectors in the tomcat's server.xml with different jvmRoute values to put in workers.properties? many thanks, David From: Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_jk - multiple workers for same Tomcat instance? Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 20:49:06 +0200 David Hay wrote: Hi, Is it possible to specify multiple workers for the same Tomcat instance? Yes. But this will impose additional load to the tomcat doubling the number of connections from apache to mod_jk for each worker. For ten workers you may end up with 2500 connections with 250 MaxClients defined in the httpd.conf. We'd like to balance different contexts with different load factors to the same Tomcat (hope that makes sense!). No. But you may feel free to express the idea that led you to consider something like that. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk - multiple workers for same Tomcat instance?
David Hay wrote: Hi, Is it possible to specify multiple workers for the same Tomcat instance? Yes. But this will impose additional load to the tomcat doubling the number of connections from apache to mod_jk for each worker. For ten workers you may end up with 2500 connections with 250 MaxClients defined in the httpd.conf. We'd like to balance different contexts with different load factors to the same Tomcat (hope that makes sense!). No. But you may feel free to express the idea that led you to consider something like that. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk - multiple workers for same Tomcat instance?
Hi, We have set up several contexts eg one for client requests and one for admin requests, for a set of Tomcat servers, fronted by Apache. We would like to balance them differently, allowing one machine to take most of the admin load. There doesn't seem to be a lbfactor parameter for a loadbalancing worker, so our second option is to create a seperate client and admin worker for each machine, and set their lbfactors separately. Unless you can recommend a better way? If we go down this route, could you explain how to set up two connectors in the tomcat's server.xml with different jvmRoute values to put in workers.properties? many thanks, David From: Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: Re: mod_jk - multiple workers for same Tomcat instance? Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 20:49:06 +0200 David Hay wrote: Hi, Is it possible to specify multiple workers for the same Tomcat instance? Yes. But this will impose additional load to the tomcat doubling the number of connections from apache to mod_jk for each worker. For ten workers you may end up with 2500 connections with 250 MaxClients defined in the httpd.conf. We'd like to balance different contexts with different load factors to the same Tomcat (hope that makes sense!). No. But you may feel free to express the idea that led you to consider something like that. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk / Apache bug - max transfer of 496kbytes
Oups sorry for that, it was due to a bug in mod_bandwidth, so not really anything to do with you guys. For some reason the rule to limit bandwidth on files larger than 500k produced a segfault. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk configuration
One way to do this is to declare a host in your server.xml instance The server.xml will need to contain an entry within the engine like Host name=myotherdomain.tld appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true Logger className=org.apache.catalina.logger.FileLogger directory=logs prefix=YOUR_PREFIX. suffix=.txt timestamp=true/ !-- this takes all requests to myotherdomain.tld and associates them to the context , may need to play with this-- Context path= docBase=/path/to/your/appDir/or/war_file crossContext=false debug=10 reloadable=false trusted=false /Context !-- ** the deva application context ** -- /Host And in your httpd.conf virtual host ... servername myotherdomain.tld JkMount /* ajp13 -- My worker /virtual host ... This seems to work in our configuration to handle this type of operation. Have Fun... Colby C. Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/22/2005 01:31 AM Please respond to Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org cc Subject mod_jk configuration Hello all, i am using Tomcat 4.1.3x, mod_jk 1.x and Apache 1.3.x. I have read all the documentation available on apache.org, but i think i have not understood some principles of JK. Problem: I have java.domain.tld pointing to the root-directory of Tomcat. The default tomcat site appears. I guess my installations are ok. I want to have myotherdomain.tld pointing to a specific webapp. I have a worker (the same as the java.domain.tld Domain), but where must i declare which context is to use? In my vhosts i have: virtual host ... JkMount /* ajp13 -- My worker /virtual host ... In my workers.properties there is nothing about an context. Documentation told me nothin about tags to declare. Btw, i installed my app with the war-deploy feat. Maybe this is important. Any help is appreciated- thank you for reading. Regards Chris - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk works as localhost only
Just another side note to this thread. I was applying the SELinux Security Policy patch to my fedora core 3 box today and it broke my apache + mod_jk + tomcat installation. The fedora team must of changed the Security Enhanced Linux Policy preventing mod_jk connecting to an external tomcat server. Policy.18 is the culprit I am sure of it. I will research this some more. But for right now, you will have to turn off SELinux for the httpd daemon. This is easy to do with the GUI tools provided in the security level settings under the SELinux tab. -Original Message- From: Randall Svancara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 9:43 AM To: Tomcat Users List; naidim Subject: RE: mod_jk works as localhost only Is it possible for you to send us your mod_jk configuration along with your workers.properties(if you have one)? Randall -Original Message- From: naidim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 12:41 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk works as localhost only I'm running Apache2.0.52 and Tomcat 5.5.9 on FC3. Both work fine locally and remotely. mod_jk is configured but it only works as localhost. Browsing by name or IP fails to find the files in the webapp directory. What do I need to change so it finds them when browseing remotely? Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk works as localhost only
Ok, well, I am posting this information to this list in this thread because we kind of got started down the path of SELinux. Fedora Core3 comes with a feature called Security Enhanced Linux. This is a security feature that you may or may not want to have on your server. I chose to enable it, so that is why I am posting this information. The main reason for using SELinux is to have finer grain control over what your processes are doing and how they are doing them. Also this information is output to the logs and is great for auditing. I highly recommend taking the time to read about SELinux if your distro supports it. First of all, I have Apache + Mod_jk on one machine and then tomcat on a separate machine. When I upgraded to SELinux Policy 18, I noticed that apache would not communicate with tomcat using the ajp13 connector. So what do you do? Well you can: 1. Disable SELinux for apache by going into the gui security level settings tool. You have to have a gui installed for this to work. 2. Disable SELinux entirely. Google for this, I can not remember how to do it. 3. Configure your SELinux policy to allow Apache+Mod_JK to work. You can do this my using the audit2allow tool. You also need the selinux-policy-targeted-sources package. Just do a: yum install selinux-policy-targeted-sources audit2allow -d allow httpd_t httpd_log_t:file write; allow httpd_t self:tcp_socket connect; allow mysqld_t ld_so_cache_t:file execute; allow unconfined_t httpd_t:file relabelto; The content above needs to be placed in /etc/selinux/targeted/src/domains/program/apache.te I had to comment out the last two lines because I was not interested in enabling them. The manual on SELinux clearly indicates to analyze the output of audit2allow carefully. Next, cd into the /etc/selinux/targeted/src directory and do: make policy make install make reload Then restart apache and it may work, or it may not. Randall -Original Message- From: Randall Svancara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 10:29 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: mod_jk works as localhost only Just another side note to this thread. I was applying the SELinux Security Policy patch to my fedora core 3 box today and it broke my apache + mod_jk + tomcat installation. The fedora team must of changed the Security Enhanced Linux Policy preventing mod_jk connecting to an external tomcat server. Policy.18 is the culprit I am sure of it. I will research this some more. But for right now, you will have to turn off SELinux for the httpd daemon. This is easy to do with the GUI tools provided in the security level settings under the SELinux tab. -Original Message- From: Randall Svancara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 9:43 AM To: Tomcat Users List; naidim Subject: RE: mod_jk works as localhost only Is it possible for you to send us your mod_jk configuration along with your workers.properties(if you have one)? Randall -Original Message- From: naidim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 12:41 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk works as localhost only I'm running Apache2.0.52 and Tomcat 5.5.9 on FC3. Both work fine locally and remotely. mod_jk is configured but it only works as localhost. Browsing by name or IP fails to find the files in the webapp directory. What do I need to change so it finds them when browseing remotely? Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk works as localhost only
Have you turned off iptables. /etc/init.d/iptables stop That will kill the firewall rules that is built in to Fedora Core3. Randall -Original Message- From: naidim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 12:41 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk works as localhost only I'm running Apache2.0.52 and Tomcat 5.5.9 on FC3. Both work fine locally and remotely. mod_jk is configured but it only works as localhost. Browsing by name or IP fails to find the files in the webapp directory. What do I need to change so it finds them when browseing remotely? Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk works as localhost only
Guru suggested it was my server.xml. I had Host name=localhost
appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true
autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false
So I changed Host from localhost to flex.homelinux.org and it works as
flex.homelinux.org, but not as localhost now, and still not by IP.
After a default install of FC3 with httpd, here are the changes I made:
Configure Apache
13 Jun 05
Edit /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
Change ServerAdmin to [email]
Uncomment #ServerName and change host to flex.homelinux.org:80
Verify ServerRoot /etc/httpd
Verify DocumentRoot /var/www/html
Change UseCanonicalName from Off to On
Restart httpd service
Configure Apache for CGI
13 Jun 05
Edit /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
Change Options Indexes FollowSymLings to Options Indexes Includes
FollowSymLinks SymLinksifOwnerMatch ExecCGI Multiviews
Change Allow Override None to Allow Override Options Fileinfo
AuthConfig Limit
Restart httpd service
Change DirectoryIndex index.html index.html.var to DirectoryIndex
index.html index.html.var index.shtml index.cgi index.php index.php3
index.phtml index.htm
Under AddType application/x-gzip .gz .tgz
Add:
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .php3 .html .htm
.shtml .phps .fds
Uncoment AddHandler cgi-script .cgi
Add .pl to the end of the line
Restart httpd service
Install Tomcat
13 Jun 05
Download jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9.tar.gz and
jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9-admin.tar.gz from
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-5.cgi
#tar xvzf jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9.tar.gz
#tar xvzf jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9-admin.tar.gz
#mv jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9 /usr/java
Edit /etc/profile
Add:
CATALINA_HOME=/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9
export CATALINA_HOME
#/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/bin/startup.sh
Browse to localhost:8080
Open Port 8080 for Tomcat
13 Jun 05
Applications-System Settings-Security Level
Add port 8080:tcp
Autostart Tomcat
#cp /usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/bin/catalina.sh /etc/init.d/catalina
Edit /etc/init.d/catalina
Add as the last comments at the top
# chkconfig: - 90 15
# description: Jakarta Tomcat Java Servlets and JSP server
Add immediately after the top comments
CATALINA_HOME=/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9
JAVA_HOME=/usr/java/jdk1.5.0_03
status() {
ps ax --width=1000 | grep
[o]rg.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap start | awk '{printf $1
}' | wc | awk '{print $2}' /tmp/tomcat_process_count.txt
read line /tmp/tomcat_process_count.txt
if [ $line -gt 0 ]; then
echo -n Tomcat ( pid
ps ax --width=1000 | grep
[o]rg.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap start | awk '{printf $1
}'
echo -n ) is running...
echo
else
echo Tomcat is stopped
fi
}
Comment out [ -z $CATALINA_HOME ] CATALINA_HOME=`cd
$PROGDIR/.. ; pwd`
Before echo Using CATALINA_BASE: $CATALINA_BASE add
if [ $1 != status ] ; then
After the echo block add fi
Add immediately before else for if [ $1 = debug ] block
elif [ $1 = status ] ; then
status
elif [ $1 = restart ] ; then
$0 stop
$0 start
Add catalina as a service and turn it on
# chkconfig --add catalina
# chkconfig catalina on
Install mod_jk for Apache/Tomcat connection
Download mod_jk-ap20-1.2.10-1jpp.i386.rpm from
http://www.jpackage.org/rpm.php?id=2456
# rpm -ivh mod_jk-ap20-1.2.10-1jpp.i386.rpm
Configure worker.properties for Apache/Tomcat connection
Edit /usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/conf/worker.properties
Change workers.tomcat_home=/var/tomcat3 to /usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9
Change workers.java_home=/opt/IBMJava2-13 to /usr/java/jdk1.5.0_03
Change worker.list=ajp12, ajp13 to worker.list=ajp13
Comment out all worker.ajp12 lines
Uncomment worker.ajp13.cachesize and add =20
Change worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=ajp12, ajp13 to just ajp13
Configure server.xml for Apache/Tomcat connection
Edit /usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/conf/server.xml
Below the line Server port=8005 add
Listener className=org.apache.jk.config.ApacheConfig
modJk=/usr/lib/httpd/modules/mod_jk.so
workersConfig=/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/conf/workers.properties
jkLog=/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/logs/mod_jk.log
jkDebug=info/
Below the line Host name=localhost appBase=webapps
unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false
xmlNamespaceAware=false add
Listener
Re: mod_jk works as localhost only
Host name=localhost
appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true
autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false
Aliaslocalhost/Alias
Aliaswww/Alias
Alias10.0.0.10/Alias
First of all please read the documents of how to install things ...
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/jk2/vhosthowto.html
- Original Message -
From: naidim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 4:59 PM
Subject: Re: mod_jk works as localhost only
Guru suggested it was my server.xml. I had Host name=localhost
appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true
autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false
So I changed Host from localhost to flex.homelinux.org and it works as
flex.homelinux.org, but not as localhost now, and still not by IP.
After a default install of FC3 with httpd, here are the changes I made:
Configure Apache
13 Jun 05
Edit /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
Change ServerAdmin to [email]
Uncomment #ServerName and change host to flex.homelinux.org:80
Verify ServerRoot /etc/httpd
Verify DocumentRoot /var/www/html
Change UseCanonicalName from Off to On
Restart httpd service
Configure Apache for CGI
13 Jun 05
Edit /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
Change Options Indexes FollowSymLings to Options Indexes Includes
FollowSymLinks SymLinksifOwnerMatch ExecCGI Multiviews
Change Allow Override None to Allow Override Options Fileinfo
AuthConfig Limit
Restart httpd service
Change DirectoryIndex index.html index.html.var to DirectoryIndex
index.html index.html.var index.shtml index.cgi index.php index.php3
index.phtml index.htm
Under AddType application/x-gzip .gz .tgz
Add:
AddType application/x-httpd-php .php .php3 .html .htm
.shtml .phps .fds
Uncoment AddHandler cgi-script .cgi
Add .pl to the end of the line
Restart httpd service
Install Tomcat
13 Jun 05
Download jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9.tar.gz and
jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9-admin.tar.gz from
http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-5.cgi
#tar xvzf jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9.tar.gz
#tar xvzf jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9-admin.tar.gz
#mv jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9 /usr/java
Edit /etc/profile
Add:
CATALINA_HOME=/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9
export CATALINA_HOME
#/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/bin/startup.sh
Browse to localhost:8080
Open Port 8080 for Tomcat
13 Jun 05
Applications-System Settings-Security Level
Add port 8080:tcp
Autostart Tomcat
#cp /usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/bin/catalina.sh
/etc/init.d/catalina
Edit /etc/init.d/catalina
Add as the last comments at the top
# chkconfig: - 90 15
# description: Jakarta Tomcat Java Servlets and JSP server
Add immediately after the top comments
CATALINA_HOME=/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9
JAVA_HOME=/usr/java/jdk1.5.0_03
status() {
ps ax --width=1000 | grep
[o]rg.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap start | awk '{printf $1
}' | wc | awk '{print $2}' /tmp/tomcat_process_count.txt
read line /tmp/tomcat_process_count.txt
if [ $line -gt 0 ]; then
echo -n Tomcat ( pid
ps ax --width=1000 | grep
[o]rg.apache.catalina.startup.Bootstrap start | awk '{printf $1
}'
echo -n ) is running...
echo
else
echo Tomcat is stopped
fi
}
Comment out [ -z $CATALINA_HOME ] CATALINA_HOME=`cd
$PROGDIR/.. ; pwd`
Before echo Using CATALINA_BASE: $CATALINA_BASE add
if [ $1 != status ] ; then
After the echo block add fi
Add immediately before else for if [ $1 = debug ] block
elif [ $1 = status ] ; then
status
elif [ $1 = restart ] ; then
$0 stop
$0 start
Add catalina as a service and turn it on
# chkconfig --add catalina
# chkconfig catalina on
Install mod_jk for Apache/Tomcat connection
Download mod_jk-ap20-1.2.10-1jpp.i386.rpm from
http://www.jpackage.org/rpm.php?id=2456
# rpm -ivh mod_jk-ap20-1.2.10-1jpp.i386.rpm
Configure worker.properties for Apache/Tomcat connection
Edit /usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9/conf/worker.properties
Change workers.tomcat_home=/var/tomcat3 to
/usr/java/jakarta-tomcat-5.5.9
Change workers.java_home=/opt/IBMJava2-13 to /usr/java/jdk1.5.0_03
Change worker.list=ajp12, ajp13 to worker.list=ajp13
Comment out all worker.ajp12 lines
Uncomment worker.ajp13.cachesize and add =20
Change worker.loadbalancer.balanced_workers=ajp12, ajp13 to just
ajp13
Configure server.xml for Apache
RE: mod_jk works as localhost only
Is it possible for you to send us your mod_jk configuration along with your workers.properties(if you have one)? Randall -Original Message- From: naidim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 12:41 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk works as localhost only I'm running Apache2.0.52 and Tomcat 5.5.9 on FC3. Both work fine locally and remotely. mod_jk is configured but it only works as localhost. Browsing by name or IP fails to find the files in the webapp directory. What do I need to change so it finds them when browseing remotely? Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk works as localhost only
It's not a firewall blocking it as far as I can tell, but I tried your suggestion with no change. Locally, I can browse localhost, localhost:8080, localhost:8080/jsp-examples and localhost/jsp-examples, showing that mod_jk is working okay. However, also locally, I can also browse by ip, ip:8080, ip:8080/jsp-examples, I CANNOT browse ip/jsp-examples. I get The requested URL /jsp-examples/ was not found on this server. Remotely I get the same results. On 6/16/05, Randall Svancara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Have you turned off iptables. /etc/init.d/iptables stop That will kill the firewall rules that is built in to Fedora Core3. Randall -Original Message- From: naidim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 12:41 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk works as localhost only I'm running Apache2.0.52 and Tomcat 5.5.9 on FC3. Both work fine locally and remotely. mod_jk is configured but it only works as localhost. Browsing by name or IP fails to find the files in the webapp directory. What do I need to change so it finds them when browseing remotely? Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk works as localhost only
send me the httpd.conf and the server.xml and worker.properties ... i will have a look ... Regards guru - Original Message - From: naidim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 7:40 PM Subject: mod_jk works as localhost only I'm running Apache2.0.52 and Tomcat 5.5.9 on FC3. Both work fine locally and remotely. mod_jk is configured but it only works as localhost. Browsing by name or IP fails to find the files in the webapp directory. What do I need to change so it finds them when browseing remotely? Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk works as localhost only
According to your httpd.conf your servername is flex.homelinux.org:80 Seems that your server.xml is wrong ... Change Host name=localhost appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false Listener className=org.apache.jk.config.ApacheConfig append=true jkWorker=ajp13/to Host name=flex.homelinux.org appBase=webapps unpackWARs=true autoDeploy=true xmlValidation=false xmlNamespaceAware=false Listener className=org.apache.jk.config.ApacheConfig append=true jkWorker=ajp13/and try http://flex.homelinux.org:80/RegardsGuru- Original Message - From: Gurumoorthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org; naidim [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 11:28 PM Subject: Re: mod_jk works as localhost only send me the httpd.conf and the server.xml and worker.properties ... i will have a look ... Regards guru - Original Message - From: naidim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 7:40 PM Subject: mod_jk works as localhost only I'm running Apache2.0.52 and Tomcat 5.5.9 on FC3. Both work fine locally and remotely. mod_jk is configured but it only works as localhost. Browsing by name or IP fails to find the files in the webapp directory. What do I need to change so it finds them when browseing remotely? Thanks - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Mod_JK error
My apologies... I should have added that I only get this error when the server comes under load and even then the errors are intermittent. -SB -Original Message- From: BATCHELOR, SCOTT (CONTRACTOR) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 2:12 PM To: Tomcat User List (E-mail) Subject: Mod_JK error Can anyone give me an idea of what might be causing this? I have searched the web to no avail. [jk_ajp_common.c (1250)]: Tomcat is down or network problems. No response has been sent to the client (yet) [Tue Jun 07 13:46:09 2005] [jk_ajp_common.c (1449)]: ERROR: Receiving from tomcat failed, recoverable operation. err=0 [Tue Jun 07 13:46:09 2005] [jk_ajp_common.c (783)]: ERROR: can't receive the response message from tomcat, network problems or tomcat is down (some IP:8012), err=-131 Thanks, SB - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk jkloglevel not showing info/error messages
Can anyone tell me if they see similar behavior, or if they see appropriate error and info messages with JkLogLevel? Bill S. -Original Message- From: Shaffer, William (KnowledgeN) Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 3:48 PM To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: mod_jk jkloglevel not showing info/error messages I'm running Apache 1.3.33 + mod_ssl 2.8.22 + mod_jk 1.2.13 on a Solaris 8 box. If I set JkLogLevel to debug, I get debug messages plus some info and error messages (when the tomcat instance is down, for example). If I set JkLogLevel to trace, I get the appropriate trace messages, as well as the debug and higher messages. If I set JkLogLevel to info or error, I get no messages in the same scenario - when the tomcat instance(s) are down. I would expect to still see the info/error messages. Can anyone explain this? Thanks... Bill S. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
Try to point your documentroot to point somewhere else and try ... -Original Message- From: Stanislav Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 May 2005 08:46 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12 Hi, I'm trying to connect Apache with TC to serve www.domain.com for instance. I have a VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com DocumentRoot /.../webapps/domain JkMount /domain worker1 JkMount /domain/* worker1 JkAutoAlias / /VirtualHost But for certain pages I get the source code instead of the TC result. Wat directive I a have to use? Directly with :8080 the pages are fine. Thanx - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
No its no a problem of finding the right file. It shows the right one, i.e. index.jsp but it shows the source and does not execute it. It seems to be for dynamic pages. For instance I have a response.Redirect() in index.jsp. SB Raghupathy,Gurumoorthy wrote: Try to point your documentroot to point somewhere else and try ... -Original Message- From: Stanislav Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 May 2005 08:46 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12 Hi, I'm trying to connect Apache with TC to serve www.domain.com for instance. I have a VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com DocumentRoot /.../webapps/domain JkMount /domain worker1 JkMount /domain/* worker1 JkAutoAlias / /VirtualHost But for certain pages I get the source code instead of the TC result. Wat directive I a have to use? Directly with :8080 the pages are fine. Thanx - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
Hi Stanislav, Stanislav Bauer schrieb: I'm trying to connect Apache with TC to serve www.domain.com for instance. I have a VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com DocumentRoot /.../webapps/domain JkMount /domain worker1 JkMount /domain/* worker1 JkAutoAlias / /VirtualHost But for certain pages I get the source code instead of the TC result. Wat directive I a have to use? Directly with :8080 the pages are fine. Sounds like the pages, where the source code is displayed instead of the result of the processed jsp file, are served by the Apache server itself and not by Tomcat as intended. This is possible because the DocumentRoot of your Apache seems to point directly to your Tomcat web application's directory. It is difficult to tell you more as you don't give a lot of information. Best wishes Lutz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
Can you tell me the listing of the /.../webapps/domain directory ? Regards Guru -Original Message- From: Stanislav Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 May 2005 09:08 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12 No its no a problem of finding the right file. It shows the right one, i.e. index.jsp but it shows the source and does not execute it. It seems to be for dynamic pages. For instance I have a response.Redirect() in index.jsp. SB Raghupathy,Gurumoorthy wrote: Try to point your documentroot to point somewhere else and try ... -Original Message- From: Stanislav Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 May 2005 08:46 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12 Hi, I'm trying to connect Apache with TC to serve www.domain.com for instance. I have a VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com DocumentRoot /.../webapps/domain JkMount /domain worker1 JkMount /domain/* worker1 JkAutoAlias / /VirtualHost But for certain pages I get the source code instead of the TC result. Wat directive I a have to use? Directly with :8080 the pages are fine. Thanx - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
OK, which information would help you. Is it necessary to point the DocumentRoot somwhere else? I thought it doesnt matter where the sources lie. Btw you are right, I point DocumentRoot directly to webapps under TC, so I dont have to have it twice. Thanx SB Lutz Zetzsche wrote: Hi Stanislav, Stanislav Bauer schrieb: I'm trying to connect Apache with TC to serve www.domain.com for instance. I have a VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com DocumentRoot /.../webapps/domain JkMount /domain worker1 JkMount /domain/* worker1 JkAutoAlias / /VirtualHost But for certain pages I get the source code instead of the TC result. Wat directive I a have to use? Directly with :8080 the pages are fine. Sounds like the pages, where the source code is displayed instead of the result of the processed jsp file, are served by the Apache server itself and not by Tomcat as intended. This is possible because the DocumentRoot of your Apache seems to point directly to your Tomcat web application's directory. It is difficult to tell you more as you don't give a lot of information. Best wishes Lutz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
/META-INF /WEB-INF various subfolders in the root, ie /domain I have index.jsp (also /domain/index.jsp) which should redirect to a subfolder. /.../webapps/domain is a standard structure of a TC WebApp. Its a small app with majorly static *.jsp pages which are displayed fine. Just two, where it seems to be some jsp-action are displayed as source. In apaches httpd.conf I also added index.jsp to the DirectoryIndex. SB Raghupathy,Gurumoorthy wrote: Can you tell me the listing of the /.../webapps/domain directory ? Regards Guru -Original Message- From: Stanislav Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 May 2005 09:08 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12 No its no a problem of finding the right file. It shows the right one, i.e. index.jsp but it shows the source and does not execute it. It seems to be for dynamic pages. For instance I have a response.Redirect() in index.jsp. SB Raghupathy,Gurumoorthy wrote: Try to point your documentroot to point somewhere else and try ... -Original Message- From: Stanislav Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 May 2005 08:46 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12 Hi, I'm trying to connect Apache with TC to serve www.domain.com for instance. I have a VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com DocumentRoot /.../webapps/domain JkMount /domain worker1 JkMount /domain/* worker1 JkAutoAlias / /VirtualHost But for certain pages I get the source code instead of the TC result. Wat directive I a have to use? Directly with :8080 the pages are fine. Thanx - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
Hi there, I also find a similar problem with my set up here (although it's more consistant and I can make it do it, but don't know how to fix it really! I run apache 1.3.33 / mod_ssl 2.8.22 and Tomcat 3.3.2 with mod_jk 1.2.10, mod_security is also compiled in but disabled as a module. If I go to www.domain.com/context/index.jsp I get a page as expected If I go to www.domain.com//context/index.jsp I get the source code, also this isn't just on one context or the index.jsp file, we run quite a few contexts and it consistently displays source code if you put double (or more) slashes in the URL before the context. Alias /context/ /www/content/www.domain.com/webapps/context/ JkMount /context/*.jsp lb-332 JkMount /context/servlet/* lb-332 Where lb-332 is the connector defined in workers.properties This only happens though for any context which is 'split' between Apache and Tomcat, if for instance I send everything to tomcat by using Any suggestions? Regards John Boocock -Original Message- From: Lutz Zetzsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 May 2005 09:13 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12 Hi Stanislav, Stanislav Bauer schrieb: I'm trying to connect Apache with TC to serve www.domain.com for instance. I have a VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com DocumentRoot /.../webapps/domain JkMount /domain worker1 JkMount /domain/* worker1 JkAutoAlias / /VirtualHost But for certain pages I get the source code instead of the TC result. Wat directive I a have to use? Directly with :8080 the pages are fine. Sounds like the pages, where the source code is displayed instead of the result of the processed jsp file, are served by the Apache server itself and not by Tomcat as intended. This is possible because the DocumentRoot of your Apache seems to point directly to your Tomcat web application's directory. It is difficult to tell you more as you don't give a lot of information. Best wishes Lutz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, and may be subject to legal privilege, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error or think you may have done so, you may not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. Please notify the sender immediately and delete the original e-mail from your system. Computer viruses can be transmitted by e-mail. Recipients should check this e-mail for the presence of viruses. The Capita Group and its subsidiaries accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
Hi Stanislav, Stanislav Bauer schrieb: In apaches httpd.conf I also added index.jsp to the DirectoryIndex. oh, bad idea! As Apache shouldn't serve jsp pages itself, you shouldn't instruct Apache to look for an index.jsp in case of a request like http://www.domain.com/dir/. Remove index.jsp from the DirectoryIndex, reload Apache and have a look if your problem is solved then. However, you should re-think your server configuration completely. I don't think that it is a good idea to mix Apache and Tomcat too much. There are several security implications. I.e. mis-configurations will allow the servers to access each other's sensitive configuration files. Tomcat may be able to read Apache's htaccess files, Apache may be able to read Tomcat's web.xml etc. I don't know why you have pointed Apache's DocumentRoot to your Tomcat web application directory but if this is not necessary, you shouldn't do it. Best wishes Lutz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
Hmm, when I remove index.jsp then I get just a directory listing. Concerning the mining, how should the structure be then? Where should DocumentRoot normaly point to? I thought it works that way: 1) Take the pages from DocumentRoot 2) If it is *.jsp pass it to TC and TC will execute them 3) Otherwise Apache sends them directly But it seams that Apache sends all directly, and if I dont have the DirectoryIndex with index.jsp it starts with a listing. Thanks SB Lutz Zetzsche wrote: Hi Stanislav, Stanislav Bauer schrieb: In apaches httpd.conf I also added index.jsp to the DirectoryIndex. oh, bad idea! As Apache shouldn't serve jsp pages itself, you shouldn't instruct Apache to look for an index.jsp in case of a request like http://www.domain.com/dir/. Remove index.jsp from the DirectoryIndex, reload Apache and have a look if your problem is solved then. However, you should re-think your server configuration completely. I don't think that it is a good idea to mix Apache and Tomcat too much. There are several security implications. I.e. mis-configurations will allow the servers to access each other's sensitive configuration files. Tomcat may be able to read Apache's htaccess files, Apache may be able to read Tomcat's web.xml etc. I don't know why you have pointed Apache's DocumentRoot to your Tomcat web application directory but if this is not necessary, you shouldn't do it. Best wishes Lutz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
Hi John, Boocock, John (CSS) schrieb: If I go to www.domain.com/context/index.jsp I get a page as expected If I go to www.domain.com//context/index.jsp I get the source code, also this isn't just on one context or the index.jsp file, we run quite a few contexts and it consistently displays source code if you put double (or more) slashes in the URL before the context. Alias /context/ /www/content/www.domain.com/webapps/context/ JkMount /context/*.jsp lb-332 JkMount /context/servlet/* lb-332 1. The above Alias in the Apache conf points to the Tomcat webapps directory. That means, Apache can access the files of the tomcat web application. 2. //context/ does not match the above JkMount patterns which start with /context/. That means, Apache does not forward a request like www.domain.com//context/index.jsp to Tomcat. The result from both is that Apache processes requests like www.domain.com//context/index.jsp itself. If it can find and access the requested file, Apache will serve it. Due to the fact, that your Apache has no module installed to process jsp files, it just serves the jsp files plain-text. That's the solution from my point of view. I would recommend not to point to any sub directory of $CATALINA_HOME with a DocumentRoot or Alias in Apache's conf to avoid such security breaches. Best wishes Lutz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
Maybe it would be sufficient to write JkMount differently but I dont know how for matching http://www.domain.com The examples seam to be written just for test scenarios, but not if you arrive to the server with http://www.domain.com Thanks SB Lutz Zetzsche wrote: Hi Stanislav, Stanislav Bauer schrieb: In apaches httpd.conf I also added index.jsp to the DirectoryIndex. oh, bad idea! As Apache shouldn't serve jsp pages itself, you shouldn't instruct Apache to look for an index.jsp in case of a request like http://www.domain.com/dir/. Remove index.jsp from the DirectoryIndex, reload Apache and have a look if your problem is solved then. However, you should re-think your server configuration completely. I don't think that it is a good idea to mix Apache and Tomcat too much. There are several security implications. I.e. mis-configurations will allow the servers to access each other's sensitive configuration files. Tomcat may be able to read Apache's htaccess files, Apache may be able to read Tomcat's web.xml etc. I don't know why you have pointed Apache's DocumentRoot to your Tomcat web application directory but if this is not necessary, you shouldn't do it. Best wishes Lutz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
Hi and thanks for the quick response 1. On point one, I appreciate that and it's deliberate to get apache serving the static content without the need to do anything particularly fancy in terms of where files are stored etc. Especially as we run 3.3.2 which isn't exactly blindingly fast for static content! :) 2. I understand that is what's causing the problem, but am unsure really of a way to fix it properly. Any suggestions on better pattern matching for the JkMount as I'm not quite sure on how flexible it is with regex, etc.? I've tried in the past to get around the problem with mod_security but it seems that it can't stop this because apache is normalising the paths so Mod_sec can't do anything about then but then when the request goes to Tomcat it regards, quite rightfully, that the connection doesn't go to through the connector because the pattern doesn't match. Regards John Boocock -Original Message- From: Lutz Zetzsche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 13 May 2005 10:21 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12 Hi John, Boocock, John (CSS) schrieb: If I go to www.domain.com/context/index.jsp I get a page as expected If I go to www.domain.com//context/index.jsp I get the source code, also this isn't just on one context or the index.jsp file, we run quite a few contexts and it consistently displays source code if you put double (or more) slashes in the URL before the context. Alias /context/ /www/content/www.domain.com/webapps/context/ JkMount /context/*.jsp lb-332 JkMount /context/servlet/* lb-332 1. The above Alias in the Apache conf points to the Tomcat webapps directory. That means, Apache can access the files of the tomcat web application. 2. //context/ does not match the above JkMount patterns which start with /context/. That means, Apache does not forward a request like www.domain.com//context/index.jsp to Tomcat. The result from both is that Apache processes requests like www.domain.com//context/index.jsp itself. If it can find and access the requested file, Apache will serve it. Due to the fact, that your Apache has no module installed to process jsp files, it just serves the jsp files plain-text. That's the solution from my point of view. I would recommend not to point to any sub directory of $CATALINA_HOME with a DocumentRoot or Alias in Apache's conf to avoid such security breaches. Best wishes Lutz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential, and may be subject to legal privilege, and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error or think you may have done so, you may not peruse, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message. Please notify the sender immediately and delete the original e-mail from your system. Computer viruses can be transmitted by e-mail. Recipients should check this e-mail for the presence of viruses. The Capita Group and its subsidiaries accept no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. *** - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
Hi Stanislav, Stanislav Bauer schrieb: Hmm, when I remove index.jsp then I get just a directory listing. Concerning the mining, how should the structure be then? Where should DocumentRoot normaly point to? I thought it works that way: 1) Take the pages from DocumentRoot 2) If it is *.jsp pass it to TC and TC will execute them 3) Otherwise Apache sends them directly But it seams that Apache sends all directly, and if I dont have the DirectoryIndex with index.jsp it starts with a listing. Ok, the directory listing also tells you which server serves the listing. I assume, it is Apache and not Tomcat, isn't it? Normally, you use Apache to serve PHP pages and Tomcat to server JSP pages. Sometimes you want, that Apache receives the requests for Tomcat and forwards them to Tomcat. Both ways, you have different web applications which you should keep separately as regards the directories. The DocumentRoot of Apache should never point to a subdirectory of $CATALINA_HOME, and the webApp and docBase attributes of Tomcat should never point to Apache directories. In my opinion. It is up to you where to point to with the DocumentRoot. I.e. /var/www/html/ or where you have your PHP web application, if you have one. All pages within Tomcat's webapp directory should be served by Tomcat. Finally, I have had a second look at the lines you have sent: VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com DocumentRoot /.../webapps/domain JkMount /domain worker1 JkMount /domain/* worker1 JkAutoAlias / /VirtualHost 1. What happens if you remove JkAutoAlias? 2. What happens if you set DocumentRoot to /.../webapps/? (Both just for a moment to see what happens. :-) ) Best wishes Lutz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
OK, First thanks for the patience. I have now a config that seams to work but: 1) I have a second domain pointing to the same IP, say www.domain2.com 2) I put JkMount /domain/* worker1 into IfModule mod_jk.c, where I have also JkWorkersFile aso 3) Now if I write www.domain2.com/domain I get the right reaction But how to configure that www.domain.com works the same I realy dont know, ie a Virtual Host. I thought it must be something like this, maybe some more directives: VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com JkMount somthing here, but what? worker1 /VirtualHost SB Lutz Zetzsche wrote: Hi Stanislav, Stanislav Bauer schrieb: Hmm, when I remove index.jsp then I get just a directory listing. Concerning the mining, how should the structure be then? Where should DocumentRoot normaly point to? I thought it works that way: 1) Take the pages from DocumentRoot 2) If it is *.jsp pass it to TC and TC will execute them 3) Otherwise Apache sends them directly But it seams that Apache sends all directly, and if I dont have the DirectoryIndex with index.jsp it starts with a listing. Ok, the directory listing also tells you which server serves the listing. I assume, it is Apache and not Tomcat, isn't it? Normally, you use Apache to serve PHP pages and Tomcat to server JSP pages. Sometimes you want, that Apache receives the requests for Tomcat and forwards them to Tomcat. Both ways, you have different web applications which you should keep separately as regards the directories. The DocumentRoot of Apache should never point to a subdirectory of $CATALINA_HOME, and the webApp and docBase attributes of Tomcat should never point to Apache directories. In my opinion. It is up to you where to point to with the DocumentRoot. I.e. /var/www/html/ or where you have your PHP web application, if you have one. All pages within Tomcat's webapp directory should be served by Tomcat. Finally, I have had a second look at the lines you have sent: VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com DocumentRoot /.../webapps/domain JkMount /domain worker1 JkMount /domain/* worker1 JkAutoAlias / /VirtualHost 1. What happens if you remove JkAutoAlias? 2. What happens if you set DocumentRoot to /.../webapps/? (Both just for a moment to see what happens. :-) ) Best wishes Lutz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
Hi Stanislav, Stanislav Bauer schrieb: I have now a config that seams to work but: 1) I have a second domain pointing to the same IP, say www.domain2.com 2) I put JkMount /domain/* worker1 into IfModule mod_jk.c, where I have also JkWorkersFile aso 3) Now if I write www.domain2.com/domain I get the right reaction But how to configure that www.domain.com works the same I realy dont know, ie a Virtual Host. I thought it must be something like this, maybe some more directives: VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com JkMount somthing here, but what? worker1 /VirtualHost Unfortunately, I don't know enough about your full Apache configuration, but if it works with one domain, it should be no problem to make it work for a second. Do you have a second virtual host for the second domain? If so, why don't you remove the virtual host for the first domain and define the first domain as ServerAlias for the virtual host of the second domain? Best wishes Lutz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
So I'm working now with just one domain :-), say www.domain.com. But instead to go directly to the jsp-webapp I have to write www.domain.com/contextname/ with virtualhost like this: VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com JkMount /contextname/* worker1 /VirtualHost Then the JSP-pages work like expected. But how is it possible to go directly to the context, ie with www.domain.com? I thought something like this: VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com JkMount /* worker1 /VirtualHost but then I end up at the manager. I wonder if it is possible at all? Regards SB Lutz Zetzsche wrote: Hi Stanislav, Stanislav Bauer schrieb: I have now a config that seams to work but: 1) I have a second domain pointing to the same IP, say www.domain2.com 2) I put JkMount /domain/* worker1 into IfModule mod_jk.c, where I have also JkWorkersFile aso 3) Now if I write www.domain2.com/domain I get the right reaction But how to configure that www.domain.com works the same I realy dont know, ie a Virtual Host. I thought it must be something like this, maybe some more directives: VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com JkMount somthing here, but what? worker1 /VirtualHost Unfortunately, I don't know enough about your full Apache configuration, but if it works with one domain, it should be no problem to make it work for a second. Do you have a second virtual host for the second domain? If so, why don't you remove the virtual host for the first domain and define the first domain as ServerAlias for the virtual host of the second domain? Best wishes Lutz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk shows source - Apache 2.0.53 mod_jk 1.2.12
Hi Stanislav, Stanislav Bauer schrieb: So I'm working now with just one domain :-), say www.domain.com. But instead to go directly to the jsp-webapp I have to write www.domain.com/contextname/ with virtualhost like this: VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com JkMount /contextname/* worker1 /VirtualHost Then the JSP-pages work like expected. But how is it possible to go directly to the context, ie with www.domain.com? I thought something like this: VirtualHost ServerName www.domain.com JkMount /* worker1 /VirtualHost but then I end up at the manager. I wonder if it is possible at all? Does the Manager also appear when you try http://www.domain.com:8080/ ? Best wishes Lutz - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk 1.2.11 build failure on solaris 2.8
J. W. Ballantine wrote: I'm trying to build mod_jk 1.2.11 on a solaris 2.8 system and it fails with: The configuration command is: ./configure --with-apxs=/local/APACHE/Apache2/bin/apxs --enable-jni --with-java-home=/a2/JAVA/java --with-java-platform=2 jni will not work anyhow on any unix system. It can work in theory only for WIN32 on Netware, so just use: ./configure --with-apxs=/local/APACHE/Apache2/bin/apxs Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk working together with mod_userdir - possible or not?
I got it partially working, Listener className=org.apache.catalina.startup.UserConfig directoryName=public_html userClass=org.apache.catalina.startup.PasswdUserDatabase/ added in server.xml shows local users dirs. but local defined ones only. Is there anyway to got user directories out from nss, to get home directories from name service switch modules like nis or ldap? best regards Torsten Krah Am Freitag, den 22.04.2005, 09:36 +0200 schrieb Mladen Turk: Torsten Krah wrote: Hello, is there any chance, to get mod_jk so configured, that it can handle jsp files, servlets ( complete webapps ) in the apache mod_userdir directory? I want to have ~/pubic_html/*.jsp interpreted by tomcat but it seems mod_jk isnt able to handle it, am i right or wrong? Any solutions for this problem? Pros Cons? mod_userdir like most other apache modules presume that you are dealing with file system. For managing virtual uri spaces you will need to use mod_rewrite. Mod_rewrite documentation has an example how to deal with home directories. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk working together with mod_userdir - possible or not?
Torsten Krah wrote: Hello, is there any chance, to get mod_jk so configured, that it can handle jsp files, servlets ( complete webapps ) in the apache mod_userdir directory? I want to have ~/pubic_html/*.jsp interpreted by tomcat but it seems mod_jk isnt able to handle it, am i right or wrong? Any solutions for this problem? Pros Cons? mod_userdir like most other apache modules presume that you are dealing with file system. For managing virtual uri spaces you will need to use mod_rewrite. Mod_rewrite documentation has an example how to deal with home directories. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk working together with mod_userdir - possible or not?
In order to get Tomcat to handle requests as in http://www.xyz.com/~username you need to use the Tomcat UserConfig class and then have apache pass off all requests to .jsp to tomcat with mod_jk. Details to use UserConfig in tomcat are at a few places including http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/06/25/tomcat_tips.html?page=2 (tip #7) Test if first by http://www.xyz.com:8080/~username/nameOfFile.jsp If you get beans and servlets working in user's public_html directory let me know because I've tried for 2 weeks and couldn't get them to work. Good luck On 22 Apr 2005 at 4:09, Torsten Krah wrote: Hello, is there any chance, to get mod_jk so configured, that it can handle jsp files, servlets ( complete webapps ) in the apache mod_userdir directory? I want to have ~/pubic_html/*.jsp interpreted by tomcat but it seems mod_jk isnt able to handle it, am i right or wrong? Any solutions for this problem? Pros Cons? best regards Torsten Krah - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk 1.2.10 can't find free endpoint
Andrey Grebnev wrote: Hello All, I try to use: - Apache 1.3.33 under Windows XP SP2 - mod_jk-1.2.10-apache-1.3.33.so IfModule mod_jk.c JkWorkerProperty worker.list=ajp13w JkWorkerProperty worker.ajp13w.type=ajp13 JkWorkerProperty worker.ajp13w.host=localhost JkWorkerProperty worker.ajp13w.port=8009 # Add the cache. Tt should match the MaxClients in httpd.conf # and maxThreads in server.xml for AJP connector JkWorkerProperty worker.ajp13w.cachesize=150 Apache 1.3 on windows is not prefork so you actually have a single connection to tomcat without setting the cache size. Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk under Win32 (Tomcat 5.0.28, apache 1.13.33)
I thought that for apache 1.3, the modules go in the libexec directory, and if so then your statement above should look like: LoadModule jk_module libexec/mod_jk.so On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:10:42 +0100 (CET), Christoph Kukulies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I installed apache 1.13.33 and tomcat 5.0.28. Both servers are running. I can test tomcat fine on port 8080. Now I want to integrate apache with tomcat and downloaded the mod_jk 1.2 binary .so file from http://jakarta.apache.org/site/downloads/downloads_tomcat-connectors.cgi I installed it as mod_jk.so in Apache\modules but when starting apache I get an error G:\Programme\Apache_Group\Apacheapache Syntax error on line 992 of g:/programme/apache_group/apache/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load g:/programme/apache_group/apache/modules/mod_jk.so into server: (127 ) Die angegebene Prozedur wurde nicht gefunden: Portions of my httpd.conf: ClearModuleList #AddModule mod_vhost_alias.c AddModule mod_env.c AddModule mod_log_config.c #AddModule mod_mime_magic.c AddModule mod_mime.c AddModule mod_negotiation.c #AddModule mod_status.c #AddModule mod_info.c AddModule mod_include.c AddModule mod_autoindex.c AddModule mod_dir.c # and at the end: LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so JkWorkersFile g:\Programme\Apache_Group\Tomcat 5.0\conf\workers.properties JkLogFile g:\Programme\Apache_Group\Apache\logs\mod_jk.log JkLogLevel info JkLogStampFormat [%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] JkMount /*.jsp ajp13 --- AddModule mod_isapi.c AddModule mod_cgi.c AddModule mod_asis.c AddModule mod_imap.c AddModule mod_actions.c #AddModule mod_speling.c AddModule mod_userdir.c AddModule mod_alias.c #AddModule mod_rewrite.c AddModule mod_access.c AddModule mod_auth.c #AddModule mod_auth_anon.c Any clues? -- Chris Christoph P. U. Kukulies kuku_at_kukulies.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk + ssl on a virtual host.
From: Robert r. Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mod_jk + ssl on a virtual host. When connecting, I can access the web application via HTTPS; however Tomcat seems unaware that the connection is secure Have you set secure=true in the connector entry in server.xml that you're using for Tomcat? (Not sure what the side effects might be.) - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk + ssl on a virtual host.
Caldarale, Charles R wrote: From: Robert r. Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: mod_jk + ssl on a virtual host. When connecting, I can access the web application via HTTPS; however Tomcat seems unaware that the connection is secure Have you set secure=true in the connector entry in server.xml that you're using for Tomcat? (Not sure what the side effects might be.) - Chuck No, currently the same connection (ajp13) is being used for both http and https. I have had success with this in the past; but not with the admitedly wierd setup that I currently am trying to get working. -- Robert r. Sanders Chief Technologist iPOV (334) 821-5412 www.ipov.net - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk: download speed problem
No one responded to my previous question, so let me try again. Is anyone here running Tomcat 5.0.x + mod_jk + Apache and downloading large files through it with normal a throughput? On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Mikhail Kruk wrote: apache 2.0.53 tomcat 5.0.29 mod_jk 1.2.8, worker configured to do ajp13 Red Hat ES 3 Going straight to Tomcat or straight to Apache downloads work fast. Going through mod_jk uploads work fast. Going through mod_jk downloads go at 70Kb/sec. Everything tested from localhost, so it's not a network issue. Similar setup but with apache 1.3 and Red Hat 7.x running the same application works fast for both uploads and downloads. I'm stuck and will really appreciate any suggestions! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk: download speed problem
Why don't you JkUnMount /download_dir your_worker? -Original Message- From: Mikhail Kruk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March 9, 2005 4:46 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk: download speed problem No one responded to my previous question, so let me try again. Is anyone here running Tomcat 5.0.x + mod_jk + Apache and downloading large files through it with normal a throughput? On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Mikhail Kruk wrote: apache 2.0.53 tomcat 5.0.29 mod_jk 1.2.8, worker configured to do ajp13 Red Hat ES 3 Going straight to Tomcat or straight to Apache downloads work fast. Going through mod_jk uploads work fast. Going through mod_jk downloads go at 70Kb/sec. Everything tested from localhost, so it's not a network issue. Similar setup but with apache 1.3 and Red Hat 7.x running the same application works fast for both uploads and downloads. I'm stuck and will really appreciate any suggestions! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] !DSPAM:422f6e9085278295916668!
Re: mod_jk: download speed problem
Mikhail Kruk wrote: No one responded to my previous question, so let me try again. Is anyone here running Tomcat 5.0.x + mod_jk + Apache and downloading large files through it with normal a throughput? Server Software:Apache/2.0.53 Server Hostname:localhost Server Port:8008 Document Path: /servlets-examples/test.jpg Document Length:1513456 bytes Concurrency Level: 1 Time taken for tests: 9.203125 seconds Complete requests: 100 Failed requests:0 Write errors: 0 Total transferred: 151370900 bytes HTML transferred: 151345600 bytes Requests per second:10.87 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 92.031 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 92.031 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 16062.26 [Kbytes/sec] received This is on WIN32, also localhost. I've tried on RH9, SLES8.2 and FreeBSD 4.11 and found no slowdown. Can you post your config files? Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk: download speed problem
The large download is generated by a servlet, it's not a static file. This is secure application and it only gives out downloads to authenticated sessions. Why don't you JkUnMount /download_dir your_worker? -Original Message- From: Mikhail Kruk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: March 9, 2005 4:46 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: mod_jk: download speed problem No one responded to my previous question, so let me try again. Is anyone here running Tomcat 5.0.x + mod_jk + Apache and downloading large files through it with normal a throughput? On Tue, 8 Mar 2005, Mikhail Kruk wrote: apache 2.0.53 tomcat 5.0.29 mod_jk 1.2.8, worker configured to do ajp13 Red Hat ES 3 Going straight to Tomcat or straight to Apache downloads work fast. Going through mod_jk uploads work fast. Going through mod_jk downloads go at 70Kb/sec. Everything tested from localhost, so it's not a network issue. Similar setup but with apache 1.3 and Red Hat 7.x running the same application works fast for both uploads and downloads. I'm stuck and will really appreciate any suggestions! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] !DSPAM:422f6e9085278295916668! - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk: download speed problem
Document Path: /servlets-examples/test.jpg And this goes through mod_jk, right? Document Length:1513456 bytes This is on WIN32, also localhost. I've tried on RH9, SLES8.2 and FreeBSD 4.11 and found no slowdown. Can you post your config files? What did you use to get this nice output? Here is the relevant part of httpd.conf: # Load mod_jk module LoadModulejk_module modules/mod_jk.so # Declare the module for IfModule directive #AddModule mod_jk.c # Where to find workers.properties JkWorkersFile /usr/local/apache2/conf/workers.properties # Where to put jk logs JkLogFile /var/log/httpd/mod_jk.log # Set the jk log level [debug/error/info] JkLogLeveldebug # Select the log format JkLogStampFormat [%a %b %d %H:%M:%S %Y] # JkOptions indicate to send SSL KEY SIZE, JkOptions +ForwardKeySize +ForwardURICompat -ForwardDirectories # JkRequestLogFormat set the request format JkRequestLogFormat %w %V %T # Send servlet for context /examples to worker named worker1 JkMount /myapp worker1 JkMount /myapp/* worker1 - cut -- Here is workers.properties: workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/tomcat workers.java_home=/usr/local/j2sdk ps=/ worker.list=worker1 worker.worker1.type=ajp13 worker.worker1.host=localhost worker.worker1.port=8009 #worker.worker1.lbfactor=50 #worker.worker1.cachesize=10 #worker.worker1.cache_timeout=600 #worker.worker1.socket_keepalive=1 #worker.worker1.reclycle_timeout=300 - cut --- I was playing with the workers.properties file (commenting those lines out on the bottom) and managed to get the speed to drop from 70 Kb/sec to 40 Kb/sec. Not sure which of the settings did it though. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk: download speed problem
workers.tomcat_home=/usr/local/tomcat workers.java_home=/usr/local/j2sdk ps=/ worker.list=worker1 worker.worker1.type=ajp13 worker.worker1.host=localhost worker.worker1.port=8009 #worker.worker1.lbfactor=50 #worker.worker1.cachesize=10 #worker.worker1.cache_timeout=600 #worker.worker1.socket_keepalive=1 #worker.worker1.reclycle_timeout=300 - cut --- I was playing with the workers.properties file (commenting those lines out on the bottom) and managed to get the speed to drop from 70 Kb/sec to 40 Kb/sec. Not sure which of the settings did it though. Yes, if I uncomment the recycle_timeout setting I get 70Kb/sec, when it is commented out it drops to 40Kb/sec. If I set it to something high like 3000 it drops to 40Kb/sec again. Nice. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk
You need to set a content type. -Tim Jörg Lindner wrote: Hello All, an ugly effect let me post this message in the list in hope of help. I run tomcat 5.0.28 connected per mod_jk (ajp13) in Apache 2. In Apache the mapping from webapp-URL to the servlet seems to work. My servlet get called. But the result differs by Webbrowsers. In InternetExplorer the Application works fine, but Netscape or Konqueror display the HTML-source produced by my servlet instead of interpreting the HTML??? Neigther in mod_jk.log nor in apache2/log/error_log I get error messages? Now, I wonder why Netscape and Konqueror don't interprete the HTML-Page from servlet? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: mod_jk
I think you need to set the content type for your response. Try something like: res.setContentType(text/html); where res is the HttpServletResponse. Jay -Original Message- From: Jörg Lindner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 12:26 PM To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: mod_jk Hello All, an ugly effect let me post this message in the list in hope of help. I run tomcat 5.0.28 connected per mod_jk (ajp13) in Apache 2. In Apache the mapping from webapp-URL to the servlet seems to work. My servlet get called. But the result differs by Webbrowsers. In InternetExplorer the Application works fine, but Netscape or Konqueror display the HTML-source produced by my servlet instead of interpreting the HTML??? Neigther in mod_jk.log nor in apache2/log/error_log I get error messages? Now, I wonder why Netscape and Konqueror don't interprete the HTML-Page from servlet? Regards, Jörg Lindner Saxony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk
Thank you, it works now with specified ContentType :-) Jörg Am Dienstag, 1. März 2005 19:28 schrieb Tim Funk: You need to set a content type. -Tim Jörg Lindner wrote: Hello All, an ugly effect let me post this message in the list in hope of help. I run tomcat 5.0.28 connected per mod_jk (ajp13) in Apache 2. In Apache the mapping from webapp-URL to the servlet seems to work. My servlet get called. But the result differs by Webbrowsers. In InternetExplorer the Application works fine, but Netscape or Konqueror display the HTML-source produced by my servlet instead of interpreting the HTML??? Neigther in mod_jk.log nor in apache2/log/error_log I get error messages? Now, I wonder why Netscape and Konqueror don't interprete the HTML-Page from servlet? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk
Thanks much! It works now with the set ContentType :-) Jörg Am Dienstag, 1. März 2005 19:42 schrieb Burgess, Jay S: I think you need to set the content type for your response. Try something like: res.setContentType(text/html); where res is the HttpServletResponse. Jay -Original Message- From: Jörg Lindner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 12:26 PM To: tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: mod_jk Hello All, an ugly effect let me post this message in the list in hope of help. I run tomcat 5.0.28 connected per mod_jk (ajp13) in Apache 2. In Apache the mapping from webapp-URL to the servlet seems to work. My servlet get called. But the result differs by Webbrowsers. In InternetExplorer the Application works fine, but Netscape or Konqueror display the HTML-source produced by my servlet instead of interpreting the HTML??? Neigther in mod_jk.log nor in apache2/log/error_log I get error messages? Now, I wonder why Netscape and Konqueror don't interprete the HTML-Page from servlet? Regards, Jörg Lindner Saxony - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk CLOSE_WAIT state and 1 byte recv buffer
No one any clues on this issue? I've got about 3000 connections hanging around in CLOSE_WAIT now. Especially that 1 byte hanging in the receive buffer keeps me puzzled. Hi, i have the following problem with mod_jk from tomcat-connectors (1.2.5 - 1.2.8) including 1.2.9 (from cvs). Environment: apache is 2.0.52, forking model, server os is linux 2.6.10-1.760_FC3smp (fedora core 3), mod_jk 1.2.9 (others tested as well) After a while i get sockets stuck in CLOSE_WAIT state and netstat shows 1 byte in the receive queue for this socket. tcpdump shows, that the backend (jetty) half-closes the connection with FIN. That FIN is acked from the mod_jk machine but the connection is not closed (no FIN is send). sample netstat output: ... tcp1 0 192.168.100.1:51003 192.168.170.8:32511 CLOSE_WAIT tcp1 0 192.168.100.1:53875 192.168.170.8:12522 CLOSE_WAIT tcp1 0 192.168.100.1:53619 192.168.170.8:12521 CLOSE_WAIT ... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk CLOSE_WAIT state and 1 byte recv buffer
Michael Stiller wrote: No one any clues on this issue? I've got about 3000 connections hanging around in CLOSE_WAIT now. Especially that 1 byte hanging in the receive buffer keeps me puzzled. Did you tried the latest CVS HEAD? It contains the hard close socket by disabling lingering. Further more try to set the socket_timeout for the worker. Also you did not mention what is the OS you are using. Is it suse 9 by any chance? Regards, Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk CLOSE_WAIT state and 1 byte recv buffer
On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 11:19 +0100, Mladen Turk wrote: Michael Stiller wrote: No one any clues on this issue? I've got about 3000 connections hanging around in CLOSE_WAIT now. Especially that 1 byte hanging in the receive buffer keeps me puzzled. Did you tried the latest CVS HEAD? I tried something i checked out from cvs last friday. The version is tomcat-connectors 1.2.9. The OS ist Fedora Core 3. It contains the hard close socket by disabling lingering. Where may i learn about the hard close patch. Maybe a pointer to the source file? Further more try to set the socket_timeout for the worker. You mean something like this: worker.proc2111.socket_timeout=10 worker.proc2111.recycle_timeout=2 worker.proc2111.cachesize=1 worker.proc2111.cache_timeout=2 Already tried it, no result so far. Cheers, -Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mod_jk CLOSE_WAIT state and 1 byte recv buffer
Michael Stiller wrote: I tried something i checked out from cvs last friday. Use more recent :) The version is tomcat-connectors 1.2.9. The OS ist Fedora Core 3. Seems that I miss the OS. It contains the hard close socket by disabling lingering. Where may i learn about the hard close patch. Maybe a pointer to the source file? http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_connect.c?rev=1.44view=log You mean something like this: worker.proc2111.socket_timeout=10 worker.proc2111.recycle_timeout=2 worker.proc2111.cachesize=1 worker.proc2111.cache_timeout=2 First, two second recycle is far to small. It should be at least higher then socket_timeout. I mean, you have 10 second timeout and 2 second recycle !?. Second no need to cache_timeout on prefork, since you have only one cached worker (default), so you don't need cachesize too. Mladen. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
