[Bug 1941785] Re: ec2-hibinit-agent: Add support for IMDSv2
** Changed in: cloud-images Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941785 Title: ec2-hibinit-agent: Add support for IMDSv2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1941785/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068750] Re: [SRU] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN
Closing this ticket as not needed anymore. Feel free to open again if this functionality is needed. ** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068750 Title: [SRU] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/+bug/2068750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
My test PPA passed the CI/CD - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-rabbitmq-server/+/915836 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068750] Re: [SRU] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN
** Summary changed: - webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN + [SRU] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN ** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068750 Title: [SRU] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/+bug/2068750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068750] Re: webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN
** Also affects: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068750 Title: webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/+bug/2068750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068750] [NEW] webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN
Public bug reported: [ Impact ] webkit2gtk does not ask for the PIN on a PIN protected smartcard. There is an upstream fix at https://github.com/WebKit/WebKit/pull/26074 [ Test Plan ] The test plan is manual due to the nature of the bug needing hardware that is difficult to simulate. An E2E test of using the smartcard with a PIN on it will be performed. [ Where problems could occur ] * Adds an extra check every time a smartcard is used. Although likely nominal, it does add computation time. * This is both a bug fix, but also a functional addition. Software using this library could be unknowingly relying on the behavior of no PIN requested, and therefore break once this functionality is added. ** Affects: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068750 Title: webkit2gtk does not ask for smartcard PIN To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/+bug/2068750/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065848] Re: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.
Thanks for the update Jacob. I will leave this bug alone and wait to hear back. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065848 Title: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resource-agents/+bug/2065848/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068641] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 apache2: misleading comment in default /etc/apache2/apache2.conf
Hello Oliver, Thank you for making this bug report! This documentation is pulled directly from Debian which you can find at [0]. I think it'd be best to have a discussion about this with Debian. Would you be okay making this bug report with Debian as well? [0] - https://salsa.debian.org/apache- team/apache2/-/blob/master/debian/config- dir/apache2.conf.in?ref_type=heads#L153 ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068641 Title: Ubuntu 24.04 apache2: misleading comment in default /etc/apache2/apache2.conf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/2068641/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068547] Re: package rabbitmq-server 3.12.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote rabbitmq-server, o script post-installation retornou erro do status de saída 1
Hello, thank you for making this bug report! Can you please give the status of `systemctl status rabbitmq- server.service`? ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068547 Title: package rabbitmq-server 3.12.1-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: o subprocesso instalado, do pacote rabbitmq-server, o script post- installation retornou erro do status de saída 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2068547/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
No, Version 0.9.4 is not planned to be backported to Jammy. Big updates like these do not happen often to stable releases. To get this fixed, the specific bug will be narrowed down and just the fix itself will need to be backported. I'd be glad to do some investigation on what other commits may look like the fix if you are able to test them out. Alternatively, do you have steps to reproduce this issue? I can investigate it more in my testbed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
I agree. I think we may have a case to do libspf2 inclusion, I'll be happy to start investigating that package and situation a bit deeper next week. For now, the default SPF code in mantic/noble is broken out of the box and I'm not sure which solution (calling bash, removing the quote macro) I like better. They both work, but I have reservations on the security implications that I don't believe I have the bandwidth right now to properly address. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report
Actually I think what may be happening here is that clamav- freshclam.service updates the database routinely, so when logwatch attempts to update it, there is nothing to update, so the failure message is actually expected. heynnema, how does your /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log look like now? ** Changed in: clamav (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608 Title: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2067608/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report
reproduction: $ lxc launch ubuntu:noble n $ lxc shell n # apt update -y && apt install -y logwatch clamav # logwatch --service clam-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608 Title: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2067608/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report
[0] in my previous comment and still see the failure. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608 Title: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2067608/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067608] Re: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report
Thank you for making this bug report! I wonder if this can be fixed by the solution in this blog[0], but the blog is pretty old so I'd be surprised such an old solution fixes it. [0] - https://adriano.ws/fixing-updates-detected-log-freshclam-daemon- error/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067608 Title: clamav-freshclam 1.0.5 and logwatch 7.7-1 fails to report To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clamav/+bug/2067608/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068645] Re: Oracular migration issues
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+merge/467051 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645 Title: Oracular migration issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular
Since multipath-tools was merged and is now in -proposed, I am closing this bug and creating a new one to track the migration failures. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645 ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064380 Title: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2064380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2068645] [NEW] Oracular migration issues
Public bug reported: This bug tracks multipath-tools migration failures. ** Affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) Status: In Progress ** Tags: update-excuse ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645 Title: Oracular migration issues To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2068645/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular
Setting to in-Progress to track the migration. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064380 Title: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2064380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular
0.9.7-7 is now in -proposed thanks to Steve Langasek. I see the merge doesn't have a few of the changes I needed when I was in the process of the noble merge[0][1]. Had a quick chat with Steve Langasek on IRC and mentioned I'll keep an eye on the migration and handle any fixes/changes that are needed. ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064380 Title: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2064380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062058] Re: Add a UFW firewall config to support QUIC
Hello, nginx versions 1.26.0-1ubuntu2 is now available for oracular. This contains the code from [0] and therefore should be available. I am closing this bug now. [0] - https://salsa.debian.org/nginx-team/nginx/-/merge_requests/73 ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062058 Title: Add a UFW firewall config to support QUIC To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/2062058/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066999] Re: enable hibernation on ARM
This is the shell script I made to test for amd64 regressions, and the results. mitchdz-hibernate-test-6mantic results: Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu16.23.10.1~mantic1 22:50:50 up 0 min, 0 user, load average: 1.18, 0.40, 0.14 mitchdz-hibernate-test-6focal results: Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu9.6~focal1 23:36:28 up 46 min, 1 user, load average: 0.31, 0.08, 0.02 mitchdz-hibernate-test-6jammy results: Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu11.22.04.5~jammy1 23:00:46 up 10 min, 0 users, load average: 0.23, 0.07, 0.02 mitchdz-hibernate-test-6noble results: Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu16.24.04.1~noble1 23:07:27 up 17 min, 1 user, load average: 0.24, 0.06, 0.02 mitchdz-hibernate-test-6oracular results: Version: 1.0.0-0ubuntu17~oracular1 23:14:17 up 24 min, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00 ** Attachment added: "test_arm_regression" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2066999/+attachment/5786062/+files/test_arm_regression -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066999 Title: enable hibernation on ARM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2066999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular
** Changed in: fcgiwrap (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: fcgiwrap (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: fcgiwrap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067942 Title: autopkgtest failure in oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fcgiwrap/+bug/2067942/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/fcgiwrap/+git/fcgiwrap/+merge/466889 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067942 Title: autopkgtest failure in oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fcgiwrap/+bug/2067942/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
I'll ask internally again, but the original reasoning why we deviated from debian is explained at https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952738 It is definitely open to discussion, and these woes with the parser can help justify it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular
Running the autopkgtest commands manually in an LXC container: ``` AUTOPKGTEST_TMP="/tmp/autopkgtest.mitch/autopkgtest_tmp" rm -rf "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP" mkdir -p "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP" cd "$AUTOPKGTEST_TMP" export GIT_AUTHOR_NAME=root export GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL=root@localhost export GIT_AUTHOR_DATE=@1234567890 + export GIT_COMMITTER_NAME=root export GIT_COMMITTER_EMAIL=root@localhost export GIT_COMMITTER_DATE=@1234567890 + git init test1 git -C test1 commit --allow-empty -m test tee /etc/nginx/sites-available/default
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
I ran `sudo exim4 -bd -d+all` on my server and sent myself an email with
the current config in noble to see what the errors look like, and I get
a ton of information, it looks like the parsing worked correctly at
least (argv[6]).
23:35:50.263 410533 direct command:
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[0] = '/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[1] = '--ip'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[2] = '${quote:$sender_host_address}'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[3] = '--scope'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[4] = 'mfrom'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[5] = '--identity'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[6] = '${quote:$sender_address}'
23:35:50.263 410533 direct command after expansion:
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[0] = '/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[1] = '--ip'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[2] = '185.125.188.123'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[3] = '--scope'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[4] = 'mfrom'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[5] = '--identity'
23:35:50.263 410533 argv[6] = '"@canonical.com"'
23:35:50.263 410533 (tainted)
23:35:50.263 410533 daemon-accept forking for expand-run
23:35:50.265 410533 daemon-accept forked for expand-run: 410540
The unfortunate thing is no real information is shown in expand-run
which is what I really care about.
It'd be nice to see what was ran in that forked process
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372
Title:
Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
One extra thing I tried, is to use the condition check logic Jammy is
using by default (which I tested a jammy system does have working SPF),
except I added preexpand like [0] mentions to use the "old" parsing
method. This didn't work, but just putting my attempt here for future
reference:
condition = ${run,preexpand {/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl --ip \
${quote:$sender_host_address} --identity \
${if def:sender_address_domain \
{--scope mfrom --identity ${quote:$sender_address}}\
{--scope helo --identity ${quote:$sender_helo_name\
{no}{${if eq {$runrc}{1}{yes}{no
[0] -
https://github.com/Exim/exim/commit/cfe6acff2ddc7eb03b3489770219edf829abd323
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372
Title:
Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
Thanks for clarifying, I misread what you meant, now I understand.
I was looking through https://github.com/Exim/exim/blob/master/doc/doc-
txt/ChangeLog to see if there were any other changes between version
4.95 and 4.96 and I don't see much else other than JH/24.
Currently I think that [0] and [1] broke something in how we are using
it.
It looks like [1] attempts to fix the run{ } parsing, even going as far
to add
${run{DIR/aux-fixed/0002.runfile ${quote:1}}{$value}{2}}
as a testcase, which is supposed to test using quotes in the run{}
command, but of course isn't doing variable substitution within the
quote and is not as complicated.
Unfortunately right now I'm not sure exactly what to test, I'm going to
dig into the actual source changes in [0] and [1] to see if there is an
implementation detail that isn't caught in the docs.
[0] -
https://github.com/Exim/exim/commit/cfe6acff2ddc7eb03b3489770219edf829abd323
[1] -
https://github.com/Exim/exim/commit/44b6e099b76f403a55e77650821f8a69e9d2682e
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372
Title:
Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067942] Re: autopkgtest failure in oracular
** Description changed: fcgiwrap has been failing autopkgtest in proposed - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/fcgiwrap/oracular/amd64 Most likely related to the git upgrade. Can be reproduced in an LXC container easily: $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:oracular o $ lxc shell o # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1.dsc # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1_amd64.deb # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0.orig.tar.xz # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1.debian.tar.xz # cat
[Bug 2067942] [NEW] autopkgtest failure in oracular
Public bug reported: fcgiwrap has been failing autopkgtest in proposed - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/fcgiwrap/oracular/amd64 Most likely related to the git upgrade. Can be reproduced in an LXC container easily: $ lxc launch ubuntu-daily:oracular o $ lxc shell o # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1.dsc # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1_amd64.deb # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0.orig.tar.xz # wget https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+sourcefiles/fcgiwrap/1.1.0-14build1/fcgiwrap_1.1.0-14build1.debian.tar.xz # cat
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Also affects: exim4 (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: exim4 (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: exim4 (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
Thanks for doing some testing around the quotes, was that with using
/usr/bin/bash?
Also the lead I had was the changelog entry from upstream:
JH/24 The ${run} expansion item now expands its command string elements after
splitting. Previously it was before; the new ordering makes handling
zero-length arguments simpler. The old ordering can be obtained by
appending a new option "preexpand", after a comma, to the "run".
So I tried using ,preexpand to hopefully get it to work and
unfortunately just see a parsing error now, similar to [0].
[0] - https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=exim-
us...@exim.org=subject:%22%5C%5Bexim%5C%5D+Failed+to+expand+ACL+string%22=newest=1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372
Title:
Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
I have a few leads I want to investigate, will report back once I do some testing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
I was also thinking about similar things.
FYI - I did find out why ${quote:} is being used -
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697057
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #697057
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697057
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372
Title:
Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
Interesting, is there no improvements at all? Did you ensure the correct version is installed? I can take a dive into the git history to see if I can find other potential fixes, but I remember looking a little while back and not finding anything that looked like a smoking gun, especially since I'm not sure what the actual bug is other than the resulting effect of high CPU usage. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066999] Re: Add ARM support
I've tested the agent on amd64 instances to ensure no regression when updating. Further results for ARM enablement coming soon. ** Description changed: - [ Impact ] + [ Impact ] This is a hardware enablement change to support hibernation on ARM. + + Related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- + aws/+bug/2060992 [ Test Plan ] The test plan is the same steps, but tested on both ARM64 and AMD64 to ensure functional enablement and no regressions for amd64. 1. Create an AWS instance 2. Update the hibernation agent 3. Spawn a process 4. Initiate hibernation of the instance 5. Resume the instance 6. Check that the process is still running on the instance [ Where problems could occur ] * Regressions in hibernation on amd64 instances due to changes to support arm. ** Summary changed: - Add ARM support + enable hibernation on ARM -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066999 Title: enable hibernation on ARM To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2066999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066999] Re: Add ARM support
** Description changed: - ARM support needed a one line change, found upstream at - https://github.com/aws/amazon-ec2-hibinit- - agent/commit/ab70d14fce4d9f05d54b363a0d849c5169e01ffa + [ Impact ] + This is a hardware enablement change to support hibernation on ARM. + + [ Test Plan ] + The test plan is the same steps, but tested on both ARM64 and AMD64 to ensure functional enablement and no regressions for amd64. + + 1. Create an AWS instance + 2. Update the hibernation agent + 3. Spawn a process + 4. Initiate hibernation of the instance + 5. Resume the instance + 6. Check that the process is still running on the instance + + [ Where problems could occur ] + * Regressions in hibernation on amd64 instances due to changes to support arm. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066999 Title: Add ARM support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2066999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
I'll do a bit of git archaeology tomorrow to try and find out why the quote macros were added. Otherwise, my vote is to go with the bash invocation in the sub-process so that way we can keep the quote macros. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
With this said, I have reservations about removing a quote macro without research. It does more than just quote wrap a variable, it also escapes quotes and other special characters from the variable To be honest, I'm no expert in this source code, but if the variables $sender_host_address or $sender_address come from metadata that the user controls, they can create a malicious payload and achieve ACE in a subprocess. This might not be an issue at all, and the variable could be properly sanitized by this point, but it's a concern I'd like to investigate before removing it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
Nice catch, I like that updated version better. This also leads more credence to an issue with parsing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067490] Re: byobu prompt
I'm also curious about the screen corruption and I'd like to reproduce it in-case it is a real bug others are experiencing. Djerk, how are you connecting to your system you are running byobu on? Is this a local system or are you connecting to a remote system and then invoking byobu? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067490 Title: byobu prompt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/byobu/+bug/2067490/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
I think I have found a fix for this issue.
My hunch is there is something buggy about the run{} command when
invoking programs directly. I wrapped the contents of run with an
explicit shell invocation, e.g.
condition = ${run{/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl \
--ip ${quote:$sender_host_address} \
--scope mfrom \
--identity ${quote:$sender_address}} \
{no}{${if eq {$runrc}{1}{yes}{no
now becomes
condition = ${run{/bin/bash -c "/usr/bin/spfquery.mail-spf-perl \
--ip ${quote:$sender_host_address} \
--scope mfrom \
--identity ${quote:$sender_address}"} \
{no}{${if eq {$runrc}{1}{yes}{no
Dominic, are you still using mantic or are you on noble by now? I'd be
glad to prepare a package for you to test if you are comfortable with
that. Alternatively you can test the changes I mentioned here. This code
is found in /etc/exim4/exim4.conf.template but of course be careful if
you are modifying this file on a live system.
I've tested this code change with a valid E2E case with SPF, and I also
tested a local lxc system with no SPF to ensure SPF validation failures
occur correctly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372
Title:
Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2067490] Re: byobu prompt
Hi Djerk, The default byobu prompt was updated since Ubuntu Noble to show the time elapsed from the previous command. You can see this code in /usr/share/byobu/profiles/bashrc You can see this profile is being applied at the end of your ~/.bashrc file. At the moment I don't think there's a way to explicitly disable just the timer, but feel free to create your own profile and/or modify your ~/.bashrc to remove the timer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067490 Title: byobu prompt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/byobu/+bug/2067490/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
I have reproduced this issue on a live noble server running exim4. Digging deeper now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066914] Re: tmux 3.4 stalls during active pane zoom
Thank you for making this bug report Dom! I've been unable to reproduce this error that you're showing. I tried on my noble laptop, a noble LXC container, and on an AWS EC2 instance. How are you creating the panes? Maybe there's a weird bug if you zoom in a certain pane configuration, I've just attempted simple horizontal/vertical split. I see gce as the CloudPlatform, how are you connecting to the tmux server? Are you simply ssh'ing into the machine and running tmux? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066914 Title: tmux 3.4 stalls during active pane zoom To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tmux/+bug/2066914/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065848] Re: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.
Thanks for the update Jacob, we will wait to hear back from you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065848 Title: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resource-agents/+bug/2065848/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
Apologies for the delay, I'm picking this back up today. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+git/multipath-tools/+merge/466356 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066999] Re: Add ARM support
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+git/ec2-hibinit-agent/+merge/466349 ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+git/ec2-hibinit-agent/+merge/466350 ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+git/ec2-hibinit-agent/+merge/466351 ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+git/ec2-hibinit-agent/+merge/466352 ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+git/ec2-hibinit-agent/+merge/466353 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066999 Title: Add ARM support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2066999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066999] [NEW] Add ARM support
Public bug reported: ARM support needed a one line change, found upstream at https://github.com/aws/amazon-ec2-hibinit- agent/commit/ab70d14fce4d9f05d54b363a0d849c5169e01ffa ** Affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Importance: High Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) Status: In Progress ** Affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: High Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) Status: In Progress ** Affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: High Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) Status: In Progress ** Affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: High Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) Status: In Progress ** Affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: High Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) Status: In Progress ** Also affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066999 Title: Add ARM support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2066999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065848] Re: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.
Thanks Jacob! Just an FYI If you try to use my PPA right now you may not get the package since the runner is in the process of packaging it. Should be published within an hour or so. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065848 Title: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resource-agents/+bug/2065848/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065848] Re: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.
** Changed in: resource-agents (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065848 Title: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resource-agents/+bug/2065848/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065848] Re: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount.
Hello Jacob, Thank you for making this bug report and making Ubuntu better! If I prepare a test package in a PPA would you be willing to help test the package? I just kicked off a build with the upstream diff applied here[0]. [0] - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp2065848-resource- agents-unbind -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065848 Title: An ocf:heartbeat:nfsserver resource's stop operation succeeded despite the /var/lib/nfs filesystem failing to unmount. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/resource-agents/+bug/2065848/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
Are you able to see any improvements in CPU usage with the fix? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
The version in my PPA I shared is still 0.8.8 with the upstream fix applied and nothing else. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
Thank you for the quick reply! I'll set Focal to Invalid due to the patch not applying cleanly and supposedly not being affected by this issue. Let me know if you think that is wrong. I applied the patch to Jammy in my PPA for testing and it applied with fuzz. I didn't see any major concerns applying it. The package in my PPA is available at [0], so please test it once you have a chance. [0] - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp2066286-multipath- tools-high-cpu-usage ** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Won't Fix => Invalid ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
Also clarifying question - it is mentioned that focal (Ubuntu 20.04) needs this fix, however focal has version 0.8.3-1ubuntu2.3 in our archives (0.8.3-1ubuntu2.4 is in proposed currently). This bug supposedly effects version 0.8.8 through 0.9.3, so therefore nothing is needed on Focal. Have you seen issues with high cpu usage on Focal too? ** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
Hi Ninoy, Thank you for making this bug report and making Ubuntu better! I would say getting multipath-tools version 0.9.4 back into Jammy/Focal is very unlikely due to the amount of changes and the risk of breaking other things in those stable releases. However, if the commit you mentioned[0] is enough to fix the issue, that change that can make it into those releases (given proper regression testing). Although, I'm not sure right away if it applies cleanly to the code. Would you like to go through the SRU process to get those changes in if you are familiar with it? [0] - https://github.com/opensvc/multipath- tools/pull/31/commits/38851dcaafe31073655761228db7f09ffc5a9a58 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2066286] Re: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath
Alternatively I can attempt to apply the upstream patch to our stable releases if you would be willing to help test out the updated package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286 Title: Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun's using Multipath To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2066286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
Thanks Paride! Just a heads up - let's please block both jammy/focal in the -proposed pocket until our openstack team can run the CI/CD with these versions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065757] Re: Merge networkx from Debian Unstable for Oracular
python3-libpysal and python3-pydot are already in the process of syncing for oracular, and the new python3-momepy package is in proposed as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065757 Title: Merge networkx from Debian Unstable for Oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/networkx/+bug/2065757/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065757] Re: Merge networkx from Debian Unstable for Oracular
Tried a quick merge and see: Missing build dependencies: python3-libpysal (>= 4.10), python3-momepy, python3-pydot (>= 2.0) So a few package updates are needed, and an addition of the new package python3-momepy. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065757 Title: Merge networkx from Debian Unstable for Oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/networkx/+bug/2065757/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065757] [NEW] Merge networkx from Debian Unstable for Oracular
Public bug reported: Ubuntu: 2.8.8-1ubuntu1 Debian: 3.2.1-4 ** Affects: networkx (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065757 Title: Merge networkx from Debian Unstable for Oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/networkx/+bug/2065757/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Mantic) ** No longer affects: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu Noble) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2049775] Re: add BTRFS support
This is being dropped for SRU reasons due to the feature not being useful for us at the moment, because the root filesystem can not be btrfs. If that changes in the future, then this will be revisited. Closing. ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049775 Title: add BTRFS support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2049775/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065682] Re: Merge new upstream version v1.0.8 for Oracular
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2065683 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065683 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2065683 Merge new upstream version v1.0.8 for Oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065682 Title: Merge new upstream version v1.0.8 for Oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2065682/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065683] [NEW] Merge new upstream version v1.0.8 for Oracular
Public bug reported: New upstream version v1.0.8 - https://github.com/aws/amazon-ec2-hibinit- agent/releases/tag/v1.0.8 Please merge for Oracular. ** Affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Assignee: Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) Status: Triaged ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10 ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065683 Title: Merge new upstream version v1.0.8 for Oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2065683/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065682] [NEW] Merge new upstream version v1.0.8 for Oracular
Public bug reported: New upstream version v1.0.8 - https://github.com/aws/amazon-ec2-hibinit- agent/releases/tag/v1.0.8 Please merge for Oracular. ** Affects: ec2-hibinit-agent (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065682 Title: Merge new upstream version v1.0.8 for Oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-hibinit-agent/+bug/2065682/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062058] Re: Add a UFW firewall config to support QUIC
Debian now has this merged in [0] and is available in debian release version 1.26.0-1 already. This is not yet in Oracular, but is planned to merge for Oracular so this can be expected there. To echo Thomas' comment, this is not currently planned for Noble, and is unlikely to make it into Noble due to needing a major version update. [0] - https://salsa.debian.org/nginx- team/nginx/-/commit/1c1713f7479092121dc0408dac3dccad1e53b4e4 ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Milestone: later => ubuntu-24.10 ** Also affects: nginx (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062058 Title: Add a UFW firewall config to support QUIC To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/2062058/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064432] Re: Merge nginx 1.26.0 from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064432 Title: Merge nginx 1.26.0 from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/2064432/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064432] Re: Merge nginx 1.26.0 from Debian unstable for oracular
1.26.0-1 is now available in Debian unstable. ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064432 Title: Merge nginx 1.26.0 from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/2064432/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064392] Re: Merge checksecurity from Debian unstable for oracular
Set to invalid due to no merge needed (we are up to date with Debian). ** Changed in: checksecurity (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: checksecurity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064392 Title: Merge checksecurity from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/checksecurity/+bug/2064392/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+git/rabbitmq-server/+merge/465972 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
oop of Raft leader elections. ++ Quorum queues with a dead lettering could fail to recover. ++ The node now can recover even if virtual host recovery terms file was + corrupted. ++ Autoheal could fail to finish if one of its state transitions initiated + by a remote node timed out. ++ Syslog client is now started even when Syslog logging is configured only + for some log sinks. ++ Policies that quorum queues ignored were still listed as applied to them. ++ If a quorum queue leader rebalancing operation timed out, CLI tools + failed with an exception instead of a sensible internal API response. ++ Handle timeout error on the rebalance function. ++ Handle and raise protocol error for absent queues assumed to be alive. ++ `rabbitmq-diagnostics status` failed to display the results when executed + against a node that had high VM watermark set as an absolute value + (using `vm_memory_high_watermark.absolute`). ++ Management and Management Agent Plugins: + * Consumer section on individual page was unintentionally hidden. ++ Management and Management Agent Plugins: + * Fix queue-type select by adding unsafe-inline CSP policy. ++ Etcd Peer Discovery Plugin: + * Only run healthcheck when backend is configured. ++ Federation Plugin: + * Use vhost to delete federated exchange. + * Added new dep8 tests: + - d/t/smoke-test + - d/t/hello-world + - d/t/publish-subscribe + - d/t/rpc + - d/t/work-queue ** Changed in: rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+git/rabbitmq-server/+merge/465969 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064457] Re: Merge rsync from Debian unstable for oracular
Please sync this. PPA - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp2064457-rsync- oracular-merge (The build runs the autopkgtest) tested for the noble bug in an lxc container, which is the only ubuntu delta. Saw the issue is fixed. root@o:~# dpkg -s rsync | grep Version: Version: 3.3.0-1~oracular1 root@o:~# rsync -F --delete-after --archive /etc/os-release /tmp/ root@o:~# ** Tags removed: needs-merge ** Tags added: needs-sync ** Summary changed: - Merge rsync from Debian unstable for oracular + Sync rsync from Debian unstable for oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064457 Title: Sync rsync from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/2064457/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
Hi, just want to add a quick comment that I’m on vacation until the end of the week so don’t expect a reply from me until then. Also will be attending the Canonical sprint next week so might not be able to update this next week either. Feel free to take a stab at this if you are triaging this bug without me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064688] Re: Merge nbd from Debian unstable for oracular
I originally made this to get the fix in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2060745 Oracular. Instead, that commit is being cherrypicked into Oracular. Keeping this open in-case nbd getes a new unstable release during Oracular. ** Description changed: Upstream: 3.26.1 Debian: 1:3.26.1-2~exp2 Ubuntu: 1:3.26.1-1build1 - - - This merge is has the fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2060745 that will let noble out of proposed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064688 Title: Merge nbd from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2064688/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
That could be a possibility. On a side note, I tried to setup a testbed to reproduce this (and start working on a dep8 test) and can't seem to get the setup working correctly. I followed the steps in bug #1998678, see the mail in `/var/mail/ubuntu` but don't see any Received-SPF headers at all, is that expected? I think I must be missing something in my setup. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1986739] Re: etckeeper cron spam => please pass --quiet to `bzr commit`
I bumped the debian bug and made a MR for their consideration. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1986739 Title: etckeeper cron spam => please pass --quiet to `bzr commit` To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/etckeeper/+bug/1986739/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
I was looking into bug #1998678 as a potential reason, do you see any concerning logs in your /var/log/exim4/mainlog (or wherever your logs are)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2046489] Re: exim4-daemon-heavy: please compile with DMARC support
** Changed in: opendmarc (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046489 Title: exim4-daemon-heavy: please compile with DMARC support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2046489/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work
Dominic, did you upgrade to mantic and start seeing this failure, or did you make a new mantic install and set things up from scratch? I wonder if some logic elsewhere was changed in Debian that we missed, or has this always been broken? This scenario would also be a nice thing to have a dep8 test going forward if that can be setup, I'm just not sure if that's feasible in the testbed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056372 Title: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/exim4/+bug/2056372/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064486] Re: package tftpd-hpa 5.2+20150808-1.2build2 failed to install/upgrade: installed tftpd-hpa package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Thank you for the response Nigel! > Looks like a false alarm Would you like to close this bug then? I'm also curious how often this issue occurs, maybe the maintainer script should be improved to check for port availability before attempting to start the unit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064486 Title: package tftpd-hpa 5.2+20150808-1.2build2 failed to install/upgrade: installed tftpd-hpa package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tftp-hpa/+bug/2064486/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064688] Re: Merge nbd from Debian unstable for oracular
Whoops, the fix is in debian experimental, we might need to wait for a new unstable release to happen. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064688 Title: Merge nbd from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2064688/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused
I didn't see a bug to track the Oracular merge, so I made it here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2064688 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060745 Title: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nbd/+bug/2060745/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused
Thanks Andreas! Regarding comment #3 a) debian version has this fix, and quite a few updates to the debian/* directory, so I think we might as well do an early oracular merge to get that fix in. B) I'm curious why the excuses page didn't pick up those autopkgtests during the sync? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060745 Title: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nbd/+bug/2060745/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064688] [NEW] Merge nbd from Debian unstable for oracular
Public bug reported: Upstream: 3.26.1 Debian: 1:3.26.1-2~exp2 Ubuntu: 1:3.26.1-1build1 This merge is has the fix for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2060745 that will let noble out of proposed. ** Affects: nbd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064688 Title: Merge nbd from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2064688/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064451] Re: Merge rabbitmq-server from Debian unstable for oracular
Right now there is nothing to do since we up to date with Debian. If we want to update it, we will need to either wait to see if Debian updates during OO development, or pull from upstream which does publish deb files. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064451 Title: Merge rabbitmq-server from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2064451/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060248] Re: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
** Description changed: This bug tracks an update for the rabbitmq-server package in Ubuntu. This bug tracks an update to the following versions: - * Focal (20.04): rabbitmq-server 3.8.12 - * Jammy (22.04): rabbitmq-server 3.9.27 + * Focal (20.04): rabbitmq-server 3.8.3 + * Jammy (22.04): rabbitmq-server 3.9.27 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248 Title: MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitmq-server/+bug/2060248/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064457] Re: Merge rsync from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu) Assignee: Sergio Durigan Junior (sergiodj) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064457 Title: Merge rsync from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsync/+bug/2064457/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064380] Re: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular
** Changed in: multipath-tools (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064380 Title: Merge multipath-tools from Debian unstable for oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/2064380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal
** Description changed: - Hi, - we recorded more than 30% performance regression on Ubuntu Focal for AWS Graviton instances since Nginx package is not compiled with "-moutline-atomics" cflag for arm64 architecture (337548 rps with default package and 484453 rps using the proposed flag). + [ Impact ] - As far as I know, only Ubuntu 20.04 is affected by it and we are - proposing a fix for it (https://code.launchpad.net/~dipietro- - salvatore/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+git/nginx/+merge/434825). + When using nginx on arm64, the CPU may go under heavy load and drop + packets when being stressed. + + A compile-time optimization to use hardware acceleration could be + included to help alleviate the CPU utilization for systems that have + atomic instructions available. + + [ Test Plan ] + + The test plan requires a decent amount of setup. This setup is covered + in full at https://github.com/mitchdz/aws-nginx-testbed. + + In short, the setup involves a focal based arm64 nginx server, 4 amd64 + focal endpoints running a nodejs applicaiton, and 1 amd64 focal server + to initiate the workloads. + + This test is an E2E test which tests both functionality and performance + improvements. + + 1) Set up the system as described in https://github.com/mitchdz/aws- + nginx-testbed + + 2) Initiate the workload on the DRV instance + $ ./wrk/wrk -t36 -c512 -d60s http://172.31.33.24:80/ # Private IP of SUT + + 3) While workload is running, capture results on SUT + $ sudo perf record -a -e r6e sleep 20s + + 4) After the test is ran, you should have metrics on both the DRV and + SUT system. + + 5) Install new nginx with -moutline atomics + $ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:mitchdz/lp2024019-moutline-atomic + $ sudo apt update + $ Sudo apt install -y nginx + $ dpkg -s nginx | grep Version + Version: 1.18.0-0ubuntu1.5~focal1 + + 6) ensure outline-atomics is installed (ctrl+f to see it, since this is not a user friendly wall of text) + $ nginx -V |& grep moutline + configure arguments: --with-cc-opt='-g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/nginx-v8ZFDO/nginx-1.18.0=. -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -fPIC -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -moutline-atomics' --with-ld-opt='-Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,-z,now -fPIC' --prefix=/usr/share/nginx --conf-path=/etc/nginx/nginx.conf --http-log-path=/var/log/nginx/access.log --error-log-path=/var/log/nginx/error.log --lock-path=/var/lock/nginx.lock --pid-path=/run/nginx.pid --modules-path=/usr/lib/nginx/modules --http-client-body-temp-path=/var/lib/nginx/body --http-fastcgi-temp-path=/var/lib/nginx/fastcgi --http-proxy-temp-path=/var/lib/nginx/proxy --http-scgi-temp-path=/var/lib/nginx/scgi --http-uwsgi-temp-path=/var/lib/nginx/uwsgi --with-debug --with-compat --with-pcre-jit --with-http_ssl_module --with-http_stub_status_module --with-http_realip_module --with-http_auth_request_module --with-http_v2_module --with-http_dav_module --with-http_slice_module --with-threads --with-http_addition_module --with-http_gunzip_module --with-http_gzip_static_module --with-http_image_filter_module=dynamic --with-http_sub_module --with-http_xslt_module=dynamic --with-stream=dynamic --with-stream_ssl_module --with-mail=dynamic --with-mail_ssl_module + + 7) re-run wrk test as shown in steps 2-3 + + Results: + - without patch: +- wrk output: + ``` + ubuntu@ip-172-31-43-203:~/wrk$ ./wrk -t36 -c512 -d60s http://172.31.40.247:80/ + Running 1m test @ http://172.31.40.247:80/ + 36 threads and 512 connections + Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev + Latency 3.14ms2.03ms 211.63ms 72.12% + Req/Sec 4.67k 0.89k 23.92k76.44% + 10056815 requests in 1.00m, 5.20GB read + Requests/sec: 167336.42 + Transfer/sec: 88.57MB + ``` + - STREX count: Samples: 4M of event 'r6e', Event count (approx.): 364457784 + - SUT CPU utiliz: 100% + + - with patch: + - wrk output: + ``` + ubuntu@ip-172-31-43-203:~/wrk$ ./wrk -t36 -c512 -d60s http://172.31.40.247:80/ + Running 1m test @ http://172.31.40.247:80/ + 36 threads and 512 connections + Thread Stats Avg Stdev Max +/- Stdev + Latency 1.02ms1.04ms 210.87ms 99.52% + Req/Sec13.94k 327.0116.95k79.69% + 30006090 requests in 1.00m, 15.51GB read + Requests/sec: 499273.74 + Transfer/sec:264.26MB + ``` + - STREX count: No Samples + - SUT CPU utiliz: 20% + The important metrics here are the perf metrics, where we can see pre-patch the CPU is under heavy load, and 864K STREX events are seen, whereas post-patch the CPU is not under as heavy of a load with only 7 cycle events. - Set up to reproduce the issue: - - AWS instance: m6g.metal - - AWS ami: ami-0aa916c7b0be51092 + [ Where Problems Could Occur ] + Performance Trade-offs: + * While this will decrease the CPU load, it will
[Bug 2024019] Re: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+git/nginx/+merge/465301 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024019 Title: Add GCC atomic support (-moutline-atomics) for arm64 on Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haproxy/+bug/2024019/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064139] Re: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
Thanks Lucas, that makes sense. I'll set this to invalid then :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064139 Title: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/runc/+bug/2064139/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064139] Re: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
It may be nice to remove the !amd64 builds since the build failures look like an issue, but maybe that's just me. ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064139 Title: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/runc/+bug/2064139/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064139] [NEW] not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
Public bug reported: All architectures except amd64 are not building due to: debian/rules binary-arch dh binary-arch --buildsystem=golang --with=golang --builddirectory=_build dpkg-genbuildinfo --build=any -O../runc_1.1.12+ds1-2ubuntu1_arm64.buildinfo dpkg-genbuildinfo: error: binary build with no binary artifacts found; .buildinfo is meaningless This is easy to reproduce by: 1. Making a chroot 2. cloning the source 3. Building with -B flag # dpkg-buildpackge -us -uc -B Alternatively you can trigger this build failure locally with sbuild by running: # sbuild --no-arch-all ** Affects: runc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: runc (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: runc (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064139 Title: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/runc/+bug/2064139/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1935709] Re: grpc++-dev doesn't install gRPCConfig.cmake
I haven't updated this for a bit, but I tried the aforementioned change in comment #7 in this PPA and it did not build - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp1935709-grpc-cmake-dev- files/+packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1935709 Title: grpc++-dev doesn't install gRPCConfig.cmake To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grpc/+bug/1935709/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061911] Re: check if new addresses for b.root-servers.net is needed
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2045297 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045297 Thanks Sergio, looks like that does cover it :) ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2045297 file root.hints needs update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061911 Title: check if new addresses for b.root-servers.net is needed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/2061911/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
