[Bug 220263]
I predict that Apple is going to fix this bug in a few years, by evangelizing @media(prefers-color-theme: dark) all over the Web. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/220263 Title: Bad Firefox integration with dark themes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/220263/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 583797]
(In reply to YumekuiNeru from comment #57) > one of the mozilla maintainers would have to accept and/or apply the patch > first I guess You might want to identify the appropriate maintainer and tag them as a review request. Take the “hg log” for the file you touched, look for a name that is most frequently mentioned as the reviewer in existing commits. It usually looks like “r+ ” in the commit summary line. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583797 Title: "Warn on closing with multiple tabs open" not honored To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/583797/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1242649] Re: shp2pgsql-gui should be in a separate package
Well, the extension can be installed independently from the postgresql-x.x-postgis-y.y package. But it’s still ridiculous that one has to install all that if one just wants to convert shape files. And yes, recurring automated shape to postgis conversion is a real business need. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242649 Title: shp2pgsql-gui should be in a separate package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgis/+bug/1242649/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1180899] Re: Update list hides important details
OK, there are three pieces of information that is present in all packages: the package name, the description synopsis, and the extended description, and there are restrictions on how they interact. (Not actually restrictions as in MUST NOT in the RFC 2119 sense, but a strong SHOULD NOT). The Policy does not talk about the actual name. 3.1: The package name must be unique. 3.4: The description as a whole must be descriptive. (Duh.) The description synopsis should contain the most important information for such cases when the extended synopsis is not displayed, such as the “apt-cache search” output, one line per package. 3.4.1: The description synopsis should not be redundant when displayed along with the package name. I interpret the “Remember that in many situations the user may only see the synopsis line - make it as informative as you can” part as “the synopsis line must be reasonably descriptive in absence of the extended description”, not as “the synopsis line can be displayed without the package name in sight”. 3.4.2: The extended description is not a continuation of the synopsis; it needs to stand on its own. Presumably, it is displayed in a separate pane or as a separate text section. Also presumably, getting the extended description requires some user effort. For the Update Manager, I think we can agree the extended description is mostly irrelevant: it makes no sense to display it for all packages. Its place is in the details pane, along with the relevant changelog excerpt. The question is about the package name and the description synopsis. You defend the position that the description synopsis is sufficient. However, the synopsis cannot contain the package name, by 3.4.1. And many packages have actual name as the package name, so, in general, the synopsis will not contain the actual name. It follows that, until and unless a new field containing the actual name is added, we need the package name displayed at all times, because it’s the closest that we have. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180899 Title: Update list hides important details To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1180899/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1180899] Re: Update list hides important details
I will quote once more from the Policy. 3.4, The description of a package: The description should describe the package (the program) to a user (system administrator) who has never met it before so that they have enough information to decide whether they want to install it. In other words, it’s the phrase with which a package introduces itself: “Hi! I’m [firefox], a [Safe and easy web browser from Mozilla].” “Hello! My name is [bzr], I am an [easy to use distributed version control system]”. Note how the description extends on the package name and does not (and need not) make sense without it. When I installed Ubuntu for the first time, I knew no preinstalled packages by name and it might be convenient if they introduced themselves at first, second, maybe fifth update. Now that I’ve been using Ubuntu for 6 years straight, it’s getting silly. If you want to argue that bzr should be named bazaar, no problem. File a bug against bzr, so that it be renamed and bzr made a transitional dummy package. But please do not ask that bzr be *described* as “Bazaar”: this description says nothing to help me decide if I want it. The solution is not to put program titles into the description, it is to show package names *along with* the description. BTW lintian complains not only at package name included literally in the synopsis line, but also with minor changes, e.g. in letter case. So e.g. putting the word “Firefox” in the synopsis won’t fly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180899 Title: Update list hides important details To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1180899/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1180899] Re: Update list hides important details
The most practical place to put the actual name is in the synopsis, which is what Software Updater shows by default. No, because that would violate Debian Policy, item 3.4.1 The single line synopsis[1]: Do not include the package name in the synopsis line. The display software knows how to display this already, and you do not need to state it. [1]: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-binary.html#s-synopsis -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180899 Title: Update list hides important details To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1180899/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1242649] [NEW] shp2pgsql-gui should be in a separate package
Public bug reported: Version information: postgis package 1.5.2-1 and later in any of the currently released distributions up to saucy, and in the current development distribution trustry To reproduce: sudo apt-get install postgis Expected: No X-related libraries are proposed for installation. Observed: All of the following otherwise unneeded libraries are installed: fontconfig fontconfig-config hicolor-icon-theme libatk1.0-0 libatk1.0-data libavahi-client3 libavahi-common-data libavahi-common3 libcairo2 libcups2 libdatrie1 libfontconfig1 libfreetype6 libgcrypt11 libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 libgdk-pixbuf2.0-common libgtk2.0-0 libgtk2.0-bin libgtk2.0-common libjasper1 libjpeg-turbo8 libjpeg8 libpango1.0-0 libpixman-1-0 libthai-data libthai0 libtiff4 libxcb-render0 libxcb-shm0 libxcomposite1 libxcursor1 libxdamage1 libxfixes3 libxft2 libxi6 libxinerama1 libxrandr2 libxrender1 ttf-dejavu-core The presence of shp2pgsql-gui forces postgis to depend on libgtk2.0-0 which depends on a bunch of X client libraries, which are not really welcome on any headless production database server. shp2pgsql-gui should be packaged separately, installed only by people who really need a gui for such a task as SHAPE to PostGIS conversion. ** Affects: postgis (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242649 Title: shp2pgsql-gui should be in a separate package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgis/+bug/1242649/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299158] Re: Liberation Mono, Droid Sans Mono: Combining diacritics out of place
I’m on Ubuntu 13.04, for me, pango-view --font='Liberation Mono' test- diac renders incorrectly (with the acute over e, not a). It’s not only gnome-terminal that is affected — gedit, mousepad, xterm, firefox too. Precomposed letters with accents are a workaround, but it only works for Latin and Greek letters. For Cyrillic and other scripts, precomposed forms do not exist in Unicode. For consistency, I prefer using combining accents exclusively, and reporting any bugs that arise. I believe, when a character is absent in a font, pango takes it from another font that does have it. Does this behavior extend to combining diacritics? If so, reproducibility of this bug depends on which other fonts are installed, and which font gets selected to provide the incorrectly positioned combining acute accent as fallback. How would I go about tracking down that font? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299158 Title: Liberation Mono, Droid Sans Mono: Combining diacritics out of place To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/msttcorefonts/+bug/299158/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1180899] [NEW] Update list hides important details
Public bug reported: Since Ubuntu Raring, update-manager no longer shows any useful information by default. I click the Update Manager icon in the indicator area, select “Show updates”, it shows a list of application names and “Xubuntu base”, with download size in the right-hand column. To see exact package names and changelogs, I have to expand the “Xubuntu base” node, expand the “Technical description” area and click through each package. This new display format is a regression for me. In Precise, the list was flat and displayed application names (package descriptions), package names and download size, all in the main list, which only required me to scroll through to see the list of updates and quickly decide if I want to update now or defer until a more convenient moment; in the new version, I am confused by multiple packages that have identical descriptions. As a user familiar with package naming conventions, I would like to see the package names and possibly versions (both installed and available), in the list of updates. On the other hand, the download size of each individual package is of low importance to me, as I have a fast and unlimited Internet connection. I therefore suggest that the list of columns should be configurable (even if via dconf-editor only), and that columns be added for package name, installed version and available version. ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180899 Title: Update list hides important details To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1180899/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1045742] [NEW] Moving a decorated window errs by decoration size
Public bug reported: To reproduce: * open a non-maximized terminal $ xdotool getactivewindow movewindow --relative 0 0 Expected: * the terminal window stays in place Observed: * the terminal window moves down by the height of the window title bar and to the right by the width of the window border ** Affects: xdotool (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045742 Title: Moving a decorated window errs by decoration size To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdotool/+bug/1045742/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563276] Re: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction
@Johannes Frank: fresh lucid build done. @lanzen: the startup script won’t prevent g-s-d from overriding your settings when the user mucks the settings around in the GUI. On the up side, in GNOME 3 there will be a proper place to put this script so that it will work reliably. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563276 Title: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/563276/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563276] Re: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction
Will get to a Lucid machine on Monday. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563276 Title: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/563276/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563276] Re: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction
Uploaded packages for Natty to my PPA. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563276 Title: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/563276/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432814] Re: Touchpad: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty
There must have been a misunderstanding here. I’m not going to support my patches on GNOME 3. In fact, they are not needed there, as there is the hook framework. When time allows, I will update my PPA for Natty, but only because Natty was released with GNOME 2. (And I understand them — GNOME 3 is horrible at the moment.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432814 Title: Touchpad: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432814] Re: Touchpad: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty
In GNOME, they decided that it is more appropriate to provide a hook that will run a user-customizable script when an input device is added or removed. The xinput or synclient invocations shown above can be added to this hook. So, for all intents and purposes, this bug can be considered “Fix Committed”. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432814 Title: Touchpad: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579112] Re: compiz crashes on alt-tab when gitk is running
I experience this bug on Maverick, compiz 1:0.8.6-0ubuntu9.1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579112 Title: compiz crashes on alt-tab when gitk is running -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579112] Re: compiz crashes on alt-tab when gitk is running
The simplest workaround is to disable icons in CompizConfig Settings Manager | your preferred window switcher. However, this severely impedes my ability to tell window miniatures apart in Static Application Switcher, and all the other switchers are too distracting to be usable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579112 Title: compiz crashes on alt-tab when gitk is running -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579112] Re: compiz crashes on alt-tab when gitk is running
Patch referenced in comment #13 helps. Compiled packages for Maverick in ppa:yurivkhan/compiz. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579112 Title: compiz crashes on alt-tab when gitk is running -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563276] Re: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction
I have not yet installed Natty, and I am not at all confident I will be ditching Gnome. Technically, if Unity also overwrites synaptic settings with non-configurable defaults, that would be a separate bug in a different program. -- No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563276] Re: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction
Ok, it was just a matter of copying the package from my “proposed” ppa. Enjoy. -- No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563276] Re: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction
Sorry, I haven’t yet had a chance to notice the new version. Thanks for reminding. Will post an update soon. -- No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563276] Re: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction
I’ve added to my PPA a version of gnome-control-center that allows one to configure tap-to-click and corner click button mappings via GUI. Maverick only. Testing results, regression reports, positive or negative feedback, constructive criticism welcome. -- No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563276] Re: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction
Yes it is a GNOME bug and a link to the related upstream bug report is provided above. But I am doing limited testing on Ubuntu users like myself while waiting for the upstream to come out of feature freeze. Meanwhile, the package for Maverick is available in ppa:yurivkhan/ppa, although it is bound to be a hard time for me keeping up with new versions. -- No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 602175] Re: glib-compile-schemas trigger not run after installation GCalctool
For me, the workaround command fails with: No such schema `org.gnome.Empathy.conversation' specified in override file `/usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/ubuntu-artwork.gschema.override' This is probably because I had uninstalled empathy before. After reinstalling empathy, `sudo glib-compile-schemas /usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas1` finishes successfully and gcalctool no longer crashes on startup. When I remove empathy again, the trigger runs and fails with the same message. I suppose removing adium-theme-ubuntu would fix this but it is a hard dependency of ubuntu-artwork which is a hard dependency of ubuntu- desktop, which is also used to help proper upgrades, so it is recommended that it not be removed (from package description). -- glib-compile-schemas trigger not run after installation GCalctool https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432814] Re: Touchpad: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty
I’m afraid not, as whenever I happen to have enough free time to work on this patch, both GNOME and Ubuntu turn out to be in feature freeze, and extended configurability counts as a feature. However, I will produce PPA builds for Maverick as soon as I get around to installing the alpha and will maintain them; also, as soon as GNOME unfreezes (which should be late September) I will attempt to get this accepted upstream. -- Touchpad: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 135874] Re: [needs-packaging] StepMania
The currently packaged version is compiled without ffmpeg and theora, and so does not play background videos. Long story: The original tarball contains a build.sh script that pulls in ffmpeg rev 8448 from svn.mplayerhq.hu. That svn repository, in turn, contains a svn:external that refers to svn://svn.mplayerhq.hu/mplayer/trunk/libswscale — in other words, the *current* version of libswscale. As a result, libswscale fails to compile. The configure script then detects that not all of ffmpeg libraries are available, and disables the use of ffmpeg. The ffmpeg.patch attempts to fix this by modifying autoconf/m4/video.m4 to accept any ffmpeg versions. In theory, this would allow to build stepmania with ffmpeg libraries installed on the system. However, for this to work, the configure script must be updated via autoconf/automake, and the original tarball does not include an autogen.sh script to accomplish this (although upstream svn repository does). With the original configure script, the system-installed ffmpeg libraries do not pass the version check, and are disabled. To sum it up, there are two ways to build a fully functional binary: * Change the build.sh script to pull ffmpeg revision 8448 without libswscale, and then pull libswscale revision 22713 (which was current at the time ffm...@8448 was committed). Build via build.sh. * Use autogen.sh from the stepmania svn repository to update the configure script. Build via ./configure ./make. I should also note that this particular version (cvs-2007-11-07) has the desirable property of being close enough to the version used in Pump It Up PRO — the theme from PIU PRO can be adapted easily enough not to crash this version of Stepmania. Later, stepmania starts to diverge. -- [needs-packaging] StepMania https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135874 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563276] Re: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction
@Johannes Konow If you are using the lucid-updates and/or lucid-proposed repositories, you might also want to add ppa:yurivkhan/proposed. -- No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563276] Re: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction
If you are using synaptic, you can force my version and then pin it. But you will miss on updates. I have updated the package but the build farm is very busy these days. Also, since Lucid is officially out, I’m freezing my main PPA. Further official updates are in the lucid-proposed pocket; my updated builds will be in ppa:yurivkhan/proposed. @Alberto Milone: Could you please have a look at my patches and maybe integrate them in lucid-proposed? Or should I rather try to get it reviewed and accepted upstream? -- No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563276] Re: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction
Thanks for prodding me. I uploaded the updated source packages; builds should be available in about an hour. -- No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563276] Re: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction
The patch above is a little dated and will not apply cleanly to gnome- settings-daemon 2.30. I maintain a package in my PPA, the relevant patches are: 06_add_corner_tapping_button_settings.patch 06_add_tap-to-click_button_settings.patch 06_change_tap-to-click_defaults.patch I will post their current versions below. I have also submitted the first two patches upstream, so when they are accepted, they will propagate to Ubuntu eventually. -- No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563276] Re: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction
In this patch: * Add gconf settings for one-finger, two-finger and three-finger taps. * Add code to read and apply these settings. * Additionally, the effect of X device button mapping on the tap mapping is considered. (Original code does not do this, causing incorrect behavior if the user changes the button mapping other than by selecting “left-handed” configuration.) ** Patch added: 06_add_corner_tapping_button_settings.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44218752/06_add_corner_tapping_button_settings.patch -- No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563276] Re: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction
Sorry, mixed up the order. This one is the first in series. The description above applies to this patch. The correct description for the patch above, which is second in series: * Add gconf settings for corner taps (left top, left bottom, right top, right bottom). * Use the same logic as in the first patch to reverse the effect of X device button mapping. ** Patch added: 06_add_tap-to-click_button_settings.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44218927/06_add_tap-to-click_button_settings.patch -- No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 563276] Re: No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction
This patch was added just yesterday, following suit with Alberto Milone who changed the defaults. This also changes defaults to what they were in Jaunty: * 1 finger for left button * 2 fingers for middle button * 3 fingers for right button ** Patch added: 06_change_tap-to-click_defaults.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44219103/06_change_tap-to-click_defaults.patch -- No way to tweak multi-finger tap reaction https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432814] Re: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty
bornagainpenguin wrote: No dice. The current package from Ubuntu is newer than the one in the PPA I try to keep up and update my packages when a new version is released. (Is there a way to receive an email notification when a new version of a certain package is released?) Uploaded an update; builds will be ready in a few minutes. I don't know what I'll do when Lucid is officially released if this is still broken I haven't had any need (other than my own screw-ups) to update the PPA packages for Karmic, since no new versions appear in the official repository. I imagine this will also be the case with Lucid when it goes stable. -- Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432814] Re: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty
I have added another patch that adds gconf settings for corner taps. Available in my PPA for Lucid only. As for changing defaults, I don’t really have a strong opinion. When there is configuration options, who needs defaults? :) -- Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432814] Re: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty
Alex Dicks wrote on 2010-03-16: Perhaps the defaults for those keys could be changed to give the Jaunty behaviour back? And then users who started using Ubuntu during the Karmic era will file a bug that Lucid changed the defaults and broke their habits, just as we are blaming Karmic here. Alvaro Kuolas wrote: This is only a Debian/Ubuntu patch that causes so much trouble? No, what causes the trouble is upstream development in GNOME. === In fact, I am not fully content with my patch, for two reasons. First and foremost, the Synaptics tap-to-button mapping is only updated whenever gconf settings change for button assignments, the master tap- to-click on/off switch, or the left/right-handed switch. The right thing to do would be to watch for every DeviceMappingNotify on every input device, so that if the user remaps buttons via e.g. xinput, taps continue working without the user having to go disable/re-enable them. I have not yet managed to get that working, and that is going to be a large change that is better off in the next development phase. Second, Ubuntu includes corner taps in the definition of tap-to-click, as opposed to GNOME who don’t. This means that in Ubuntu the corner-to- button mapping needs similar treatment — for device button mapping and for customization. I will do an update as time allows. -- Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432814] Re: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty
Added Karmic test packages to PPA. -- Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432814] Re: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty
** Also affects: gnome-settings-daemon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432814] Re: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty
Updated patch. ** Patch added: 0001-Add-tap-to-click-button-settings.v8.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39888553/0001-Add-tap-to-click-button-settings.v8.patch -- Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432814] Re: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty
Test packages for Lucid are available in my ppa at https://launchpad.net/~yurivkhan/+archive/ppa . -- Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432814] Re: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty
OK, here’s a status update. The patch I sent upstream has passed peer review, but GNOME is currently in feature freeze in preparation for 2.30 release. I have filed for a freeze break, but only received one “not totally against” reply so far, so I’m not confident a break will be granted. So I’d like to ask if this patch can be accepted into Lucid as a debdiff. If so, how would I go about submitting it, apart from providing the patch itself? ** Patch added: Add tap-to-click gconf settings to gnome-settings-daemon http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39740497/0001-Add-tap-to-click-button-settings.v7.patch ** Changed in: xserver-xorg-input-synaptics (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 512615] Re: fonts are incorrectly rendered due to not using system cairo
Alexander Sack wrote on 2010-02-04: This has highest priority ... but we prefer this getting fixed upstream rather than running our own patches or even system cairo again What are the negative consequences of building with system cairo? -- fonts are incorrectly rendered due to not using system cairo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432814] Re: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty
** Also affects: gnome-settings-daemon via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598820 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 512615] Re: fonts are incorrectly rendered due to not using system cairo
Also affects ppa:mozillateam/firefox-stable and ppa:ubuntu-mozilla- daily/ppa. -- fonts are incorrectly rendered due to not using system cairo https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/512615 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311434] Re: Add UI toggle for show controls for un-maximized windows
Also, maybe the decision whether to show the title or not should depend not on “is maximized” but on “has no decorations”. The maximus project has the relevant function, wnck_window_is_decorated. -- Add UI toggle for show controls for un-maximized windows https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311434] Re: Add UI toggle for show controls for un-maximized windows
I will second this feature request. My use case is: * A netbook with a 1024×600 screen. * GNOME panel on top, 24px high. * Remote desktop connection to another machine. Since screen estate is at a premium, I start the connection with: rdesktop -Dg 1024x576+0+24 server.ip (-D to remove window decorations, -g to set window geometry). In this setup, the rdesktop window is not considered maximized and does not get a window-picker-applet title; but, because of -D, it does not have a title of its own. At the same time, it is highly desirable to see the window title text because it contains the name of the server connected to. -- Add UI toggle for show controls for un-maximized windows https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 311434] Re: Add UI toggle for show controls for un-maximized windows
** Changed in: window-picker-applet (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New ** Changed in: window-picker-applet Status: Incomplete = New -- Add UI toggle for show controls for un-maximized windows https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311434 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432814] Re: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty
OK, I looked a little further, here’s my understanding. * The touchpad is first configured with xorg.conf, hal policies and the code in xserver-xorg-input-synaptics. * When GNOME starts, the gnome-settings-daemon kicks in. It has a mouse plugin that resets TapButton# settings every once in a while, and on each change of the tap_to_click gconf setting. It does that by changing the Synaptics Tap Action property, replacing the 5th, 6th and 7th values with (0,0,0) or (1,3,2) to disable or enable tap-to-click, respectively. * The Synaptics Tap Action property is documented in synaptics(4): “order: RT, RB, LT, LB, F1, F2, F3.” So, 1-finger tap is set to button 1 (left), 2-finger tap to button 3 (right), and 3-finger tap to button 2 (middle). * The xserver-xorg-input-synaptics patch 104_always_enable_tapping.patch is irrelevant because it would only affect the initial setup, which is overridden by gnome-settings-daemon mouse plugin. * The xserver-xorg-input-synaptics patch 105_correct_multifinger_click.patch is irrelevant because it is commented out, and because it dealt with gestures like “put 2 or 3 fingers on the touchpad and click the physical left button” rather than “tap with 2 or 3 buttons”. * The Jaunty version of gnome-settings-daemon does not include the tap-to-click code, which explains why the bug appeared in Karmic. I have created a patch for gnome-settings-daemon that adds three gconf settings and passes their values into Synaptics Tap Action property, and submitted it to the GNOME Bugzilla at https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598820#c10 . ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #598820 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598820 -- Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 432814] Re: Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty
I had the impression that TapButton# options could be configured in the appropriate InputDevice section of xorg.conf, but right now I seem to be unable to do so. The Xorg.0.log reports no errors but synclient -l lists TapButton2=3 and TapButton3=2. -- Action for middle and right click is reversed since jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432814 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322695] [NEW] Cite.php: a space appears after each reference marker
Public bug reported: Version info: Ubuntu Intrepid 8.10, MediaWiki 1:1.12.0-2ubuntu0.1, mediawiki-extensions 1.4 When a ref/ref tag is used in a MediaWiki article to add a footnote, an extraneous space appears after the footnote marker. This may cause the following punctuation to be line-wrapped incorrectly. To reproduce: * Create and save a page containing the following markup: == Lorem ipsumrefdolor sit/refamet. references/ == Expected: * In the displayed page, the footnote marker is immediately followed by the word 'amet'. Observed: * In the displayed page, the footnote marker appears to be followed by a space and then the word 'amet'. * In the generated HTML, the /sup closing the footnote marker is followed by an HTML comment containing the NewPP limit report, then by a newline, then the word 'amet'. Cause: * The extension Cite.php as packaged is an obsolete version. Specifically, it uses a deprecated method of parsing the contents of ref…/ref that has a side effect of outputting a preprocessor limits report comment followed by a newline, after each footnote marker. This newline is then interpreted by browsers as a space. Workaround: * Install the Cite.php revision 33026 (for MediaWiki 1.12) from the MediaWiki site. ** Affects: mediawiki-extensions (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Cite.php: a space appears after each reference marker https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299158] [NEW] Liberation Mono: Combining diacritics out of place
Public bug reported: In the Liberation Mono font, combining diacritical marks are drawn over the following character rather than the preceding. According to the Unicode standard since at least version 3.0, chapter 3.6, verse D56, combining characters apply to the preceding base character. However, this font renders them on the following base character. Version info: Ubuntu Intrepid ttf-liberation 1.04~beta2-2 To reproduce: 1. Open gedit. 2. Type the following three code points: U+0061 U+0301 U+0065 (Latin small letter a, Combining acute accent, Latin small letter e). 3. Via Edit|Preferences|Font Colors|Font, select the Liberation Mono font. Expected: * Two grapheme clusters are displayed: Latin small letter a with acute accent, Latin small letter e. Observed: * The grapheme clusters displayed are: Latin small letter a, Latin small letter e with acute accent. ** Affects: ttf-liberation (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: combining liberation ttf -- Liberation Mono: Combining diacritics out of place https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299158 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299160] [NEW] Bitstream Vera Sans Mono: Combining diacritics out of place
Public bug reported: In the Bitstream Vera Sans Mono font, combining diacritical marks are drawn over the following character rather than the preceding. According to the Unicode standard since at least version 3.0, chapter 3.6, verse D56, combining characters apply to the preceding base character. However, this font renders them on the following base character. Version info: Ubuntu Intrepid ttf-bitstream-vera 1.10-7 To reproduce: 1. Open gedit. 2. Type the following three code points: U+0061 U+0301 U+0065 (Latin small letter a, Combining acute accent, Latin small letter e). 3. Via Edit|Preferences|Font Colors|Font, select the Bitstream Vera Sans Mono font. Expected: * Two grapheme clusters are displayed: Latin small letter a with acute accent, Latin small letter e. Observed: * The grapheme clusters displayed are: Latin small letter a, Latin small letter e with acute accent. ** Affects: ttf-bitstream-vera (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: bitstream combining ttf ** Description changed: In the Bitstream Vera Sans Mono font, combining diacritical marks are drawn over the following character rather than the preceding. According to the Unicode standard since at least version 3.0, chapter 3.6, verse D56, combining characters apply to the preceding base character. However, this font renders them on the following base character. + + Version info: + Ubuntu Intrepid + ttf-bitstream-vera 1.10-7 To reproduce: 1. Open gedit. 2. Type the following three code points: U+0061 U+0301 U+0065 (Latin small letter a, Combining acute accent, Latin small letter e). 3. Via Edit|Preferences|Font Colors|Font, select the Bitstream Vera Sans Mono font. Expected: * Two grapheme clusters are displayed: Latin small letter a with acute accent, Latin small letter e. Observed: * The grapheme clusters displayed are: Latin small letter a, Latin small letter e with acute accent. -- Bitstream Vera Sans Mono: Combining diacritics out of place https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299160 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299158] Re: Liberation Mono: Combining diacritics out of place
** Description changed: In the Liberation Mono font, combining diacritical marks are drawn over the following character rather than the preceding. According to the Unicode standard since at least version 3.0, chapter 3.6, verse D56, combining characters apply to the preceding base character. However, this font renders them on the following base character. + + Version info: + Ubuntu Intrepid + ttf-liberation 1.04~beta2-2 To reproduce: 1. Open gedit. 2. Type the following three code points: U+0061 U+0301 U+0065 (Latin small letter a, Combining acute accent, Latin small letter e). 3. Via Edit|Preferences|Font Colors|Font, select the Liberation Mono font. Expected: * Two grapheme clusters are displayed: Latin small letter a with acute accent, Latin small letter e. Observed: * The grapheme clusters displayed are: Latin small letter a, Latin small letter e with acute accent. -- Liberation Mono: Combining diacritics out of place https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299158 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 299166] [NEW] Nimbus Mono L: Combining diacritics out of place
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gsfonts In the Nimbus Mono L font, combining diacritical marks are drawn over the following character rather than the preceding. According to the Unicode standard since at least version 3.0, chapter 3.6, verse D56, combining characters apply to the preceding base character. However, this font renders them on the following base character. Version info: Ubuntu Intrepid gsfonts 1:8.11+urwcyr1.0.7~pre43-2 To reproduce: 1. Open gedit. 2. Type the following three code points: U+0061 U+0301 U+0065 (Latin small letter a, Combining acute accent, Latin small letter e). 3. Via Edit|Preferences|Font Colors|Font, select the Nimbus Mono L font. Expected: * Two grapheme clusters are displayed: Latin small letter a with acute accent, Latin small letter e. Observed: * The grapheme clusters displayed are: Latin small letter a, Latin small letter e with acute accent. ** Affects: gsfonts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: combining nimbus -- Nimbus Mono L: Combining diacritics out of place https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299166 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270670] Re: X keeps crashing after resuming from suspend/hibernate [945GM]
I am seeing this too, on an ASUS EeePC 901. The relevant excerpt from dmesg output is: [11127.048879] sd 1:0:1:0: [sdb] Starting disk [11127.160088] usb 5-5: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 2 [11127.404086] usb 5-8: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4 [11128.205066] uvcvideo 5-8:1.0: no reset_resume for driver uvcvideo? [11128.205078] uvcvideo 5-8:1.1: no reset_resume for driver uvcvideo? [11128.316087] usb 4-1: reset full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 2 [11129.112128] pci :00:02.0: PCI INT A - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 16 [11129.112146] pci :00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64 [11129.266506] uvcvideo: Found UVC 1.00 device USB 2.0 Camera (05e3:0505) [11129.588299] PM: resume devices took 3.452 seconds [11129.588349] PM: Finishing wakeup. [11129.588353] Restarting tasks ... done. [11131.038119] ATL1E :04:00.0: PCI INT A - GSI 17 (level, low) - IRQ 17 [11131.038167] ATL1E :04:00.0: setting latency timer to 64 [11131.666280] Xorg[7734]: segfault at 5f41 ip b79f6d64 sp bfe15030 error 4 in libdri.so[b79f3000+8000] [11132.848626] input: Power Button (FF) as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXPWRBN:00/input/input18 [11132.897308] ACPI: Power Button (FF) [PWRF] [11132.897588] input: Lid Switch as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/PNP0C0D:00/input/input19 [11132.936969] ACPI: Lid Switch [LID] Also attached is the X.org log. ** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log.old http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19328419/Xorg.0.log.old -- X keeps crashing after resuming from suspend/hibernate [945GM] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270670 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
