[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
** Changed in: gcal (Debian) Status: New = Fix Released -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
Given that the package is quite abandoned, the changes look good to me (as long as you forward the debdiff to Debian -in a bug, not in a private mail to the Maintainer-), except one of them: don't change the debhelper level to 6, but instead to 4 or 5 (to make backports easier). Daniel, are you OK with the full debdiff being uploaded? -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
(Unsubscribing ubuntu-universe-sponsors for now and subscribing Daniel and me.) -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
** Changed in: gcal (Debian) Status: Unknown = New -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
** Changed in: gcal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Medium Assignee: (unassigned) = Siegfried Gevatter (RainCT) (rainct) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
This bug was fixed in the package gcal - 3.01.1-5.1ubuntu1 --- gcal (3.01.1-5.1ubuntu1) hardy; urgency=low * Rebuild to fix segfault on amd64 (LP: #102373) * Change quoting of CFLAGS, to prevent FTBFS with latest dpkg version * Correct lintian warnings: - Escape minus signs in the gcal manpage - Bump debhelper compat from 3 (deprecated) to 4 - Build depend on debhelper = 6.0.0 - Use debian/compat instead of DH_COMPAT - Do not ignore make errors in clean rule - Bump standards-version from 3.5.5 to 3.7.3 - Update FSF address in debian/copyright - Correct spelling error in Debian GNU/Linux in debian/copyright * Use pager as default pager command, as required by Debian policy 11.4, by setting PAGER1=pager for the configure command * Modify Maintainer value to match the DebianMaintainerField specification. -- Albert Damen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 17 Feb 2008 15:30:35 +0100 ** Changed in: gcal (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
Uploaded (after changing compat level to 4). Thanks! ** Changed in: gcal (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
The patch has been forwarded to Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266365 Also, please note gcal was orphaned in Debian 10 days ago: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465930 -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
** Also affects: gcal (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266365 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
Looks good. Go ahead and upload! :-) -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
Why is the new debhelper version necessary? Also you introduce quite a lot of other changes over the Debian package, which need to be merged manually. All these changes would only make sense if they go to Debian too. -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
Considering the very low update frequency from debian and the guidelines given here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg256671.html it seemed good to me to give the package a full uplift, including the debhelper and standards-version bump. In my opinion the chance we would need to consider a merge or sync would be very low. However, I have removed the lintian fixes and created the debdiff which only changes the CFLAGS setting to prevent a FTBFS with the latest dpkg. ** Attachment added: debdiff-minimal http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12075666/debdiff-minimal -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
Sponsor, can you please sponsor this update for gcal? gcal has given segfaults on amd64 since dapper, and has not been rebuilt since 2005. Last week a rebuild solved the problem, but now a change in the CFLAGS setting is required to build with the latest dpkg version. Since a change is needed anyway and because the package has a low frequency of updates (last updates were 2001 and 2004), I have also fixed the lintian warnings. Finally, I have added a pager setting which makes gcal -p use the setting of /etc/alternatives/pager (see debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=266365). ** Attachment added: debdiff_gcal http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12049041/debdiff_gcal ** Changed in: gcal (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
** Changed in: gcal (Ubuntu) Assignee: albert (albrt) = (unassigned) -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
The problem is still present in Hardy on amd64. A rebuild fixes the problem, but the package needs a little more work. ** Changed in: gcal (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = albert (albrt) Status: New = In Progress -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
gcal is crashing for me in Gutsy. ** Attachment added: _usr_bin_gcal.1000.crash http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10134700/_usr_bin_gcal.1000.crash -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
Yes, for me too on amd64.
I have attached gcal.[sl]trace
On Tuesday 23 October 2007 01:59:39 pm Matt C wrote:
gcal is crashing for me in Gutsy.
** Attachment added: _usr_bin_gcal.1000.crash
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10134700/_usr_bin_gcal.1000.crash
--
Jeff Bralley 251-599-1259 CST Mobile,AL,USA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bralley.networklight.net/ http://bralley.com/
execve(/usr/bin/gcal, [gcal], [/* 33 vars */]) = 0
brk(0) = 0x5ca000
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2abf4eaa
uname({sys=Linux, node=rose4, ...}) = 0
access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
mmap(NULL, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2abf4eaa1000
access(/etc/ld.so.preload, R_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/etc/ld.so.cache, O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=63391, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 63391, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x2abf4eaa3000
close(3)= 0
access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/lib/libm.so.6, O_RDONLY)= 3
read(3, \177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\0\1\0\0\0\320\0\0..., 832) = 832
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=526568, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 2621672, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) =
0x2abf4eca1000
mprotect(0x2abf4ed21000, 2093056, PROT_NONE) = 0
mmap(0x2abf4ef2, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x7f000) = 0x2abf4ef2
close(3)= 0
access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/lib/libncurses.so.5, O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, \177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\0\1\0\0\0 \347\1\0..., 832) = 832
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=375920, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 2473128, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) =
0x2abf4ef22000
mprotect(0x2abf4ef71000, 2097152, PROT_NONE) = 0
mmap(0x2abf4f171000, 53248, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x4f000) = 0x2abf4f171000
close(3)= 0
access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/lib/libc.so.6, O_RDONLY)= 3
read(3, \177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\0\1\0\0\0`\334\1\0..., 832) = 832
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=1408312, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 3514744, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) =
0x2abf4f17e000
mprotect(0x2abf4f2d, 2093056, PROT_NONE) = 0
mmap(0x2abf4f4cf000, 20480, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x151000) = 0x2abf4f4cf000
mmap(0x2abf4f4d4000, 16760, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x2abf4f4d4000
close(3)= 0
access(/etc/ld.so.nohwcap, F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
open(/lib/libdl.so.2, O_RDONLY) = 3
read(3, \177ELF\2\1\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\3\0\0\1\0\0\0 \16\0\0..., 832) = 832
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=14624, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 2109728, PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0) =
0x2abf4f4d9000
mprotect(0x2abf4f4db000, 2097152, PROT_NONE) = 0
mmap(0x2abf4f6db000, 8192, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,
MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_FIXED|MAP_DENYWRITE, 3, 0x2000) = 0x2abf4f6db000
close(3)= 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2abf4f6dd000
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2abf4f6de000
arch_prctl(ARCH_SET_FS, 0x2abf4f6dddb0) = 0
mprotect(0x2abf4f4cf000, 12288, PROT_READ) = 0
munmap(0x2abf4eaa3000, 63391) = 0
brk(0) = 0x5ca000
brk(0x5eb000) = 0x5eb000
open(/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
open(/usr/share/locale/locale.alias, O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2586, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x2abf4eaa3000
read(3, # Locale name alias data base.\n#..., 4096) = 2586
read(3, , 4096) = 0
close(3)= 0
munmap(0x2abf4eaa3000, 4096)= 0
open(/usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/LC_IDENTIFICATION, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No
such file or directory)
open(/usr/lib/locale/en_US.utf8/LC_IDENTIFICATION, O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=373, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 373, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x2abf4eaa3000
close(3)= 0
open(/usr/lib/gconv/gconv-modules.cache, O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=25486, ...}) = 0
mmap(NULL, 25486, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, 3, 0) = 0x2abf4eaa4000
close(3)= 0
open(/usr/lib/locale/en_US.UTF-8/LC_MEASUREMENT, O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No
such file or directory)
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
gcal seems to be working ok in Gutsy beta -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
On Saturday 06 October 2007 11:12:33 am jclemon wrote: gcal seems to be working ok in Gutsy beta Yes it is. Thanks. -- Jeff Bralley 251-599-1259 CST Mobile,AL,USA mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bralley.networklight.net/ http://bralley.com/ !Increase the Dosage! -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102373] Re: gcal failed with a segmentation fault.
** Summary changed: - gcal failed with a segnentation fault. + gcal failed with a segmentation fault. -- gcal failed with a segmentation fault. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102373 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
