Re: Spark Certification

2016-02-14 Thread ayan guha
Thanks. Do we have any forum or study group for certification aspirants? I
would like to join.
On 15 Feb 2016 05:53, "Olivier Girardot" 
wrote:

> It does not contain (as of yet) anything > 1.3 (for example in depth
> knowledge of the Dataframe API)
> but you need to know about all the modules (Core, Streaming, SQL, MLLib,
> GraphX)
>
> Regards,
>
> Olivier.
>
> 2016-02-11 19:31 GMT+01:00 Prem Sure :
>
>> I did recently. it includes MLib & Graphx too and I felt like exam
>> content covered all topics till 1.3 and not the > 1.3 versions of spark.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Janardhan Karri 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am planning to do that with databricks
>>> http://go.databricks.com/spark-certified-developer
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Janardhan
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Timothy Spann 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 I was wondering that as well.

 Also is it fully updated for 1.6?

 Tim
 http://airisdata.com/
 http://sparkdeveloper.com/


 From: naga sharathrayapati 
 Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 11:36 PM
 To: "user@spark.apache.org" 
 Subject: Spark Certification

 Hello All,

 I am planning on taking Spark Certification and I was wondering If one
 has to be well equipped with  MLib & GraphX as well or not ?

 Please advise

 Thanks

>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> *Olivier Girardot* | AssociƩ
> o.girar...@lateral-thoughts.com
> +33 6 24 09 17 94
>


Re: Spark Certification

2016-02-14 Thread Olivier Girardot
It does not contain (as of yet) anything > 1.3 (for example in depth
knowledge of the Dataframe API)
but you need to know about all the modules (Core, Streaming, SQL, MLLib,
GraphX)

Regards,

Olivier.

2016-02-11 19:31 GMT+01:00 Prem Sure :

> I did recently. it includes MLib & Graphx too and I felt like exam content
> covered all topics till 1.3 and not the > 1.3 versions of spark.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Janardhan Karri 
> wrote:
>
>> I am planning to do that with databricks
>> http://go.databricks.com/spark-certified-developer
>>
>> Regards,
>> Janardhan
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Timothy Spann 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I was wondering that as well.
>>>
>>> Also is it fully updated for 1.6?
>>>
>>> Tim
>>> http://airisdata.com/
>>> http://sparkdeveloper.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> From: naga sharathrayapati 
>>> Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 11:36 PM
>>> To: "user@spark.apache.org" 
>>> Subject: Spark Certification
>>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> I am planning on taking Spark Certification and I was wondering If one
>>> has to be well equipped with  MLib & GraphX as well or not ?
>>>
>>> Please advise
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
*Olivier Girardot* | AssociƩ
o.girar...@lateral-thoughts.com
+33 6 24 09 17 94


Re: Spark Certification

2016-02-11 Thread Timothy Spann
I was wondering that as well.

Also is it fully updated for 1.6?

Tim
http://airisdata.com/
http://sparkdeveloper.com/


From: naga sharathrayapati 
>
Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 11:36 PM
To: "user@spark.apache.org" 
>
Subject: Spark Certification

Hello All,

I am planning on taking Spark Certification and I was wondering If one has to 
be well equipped with  MLib & GraphX as well or not ?

Please advise

Thanks


Re: Spark Certification

2016-02-11 Thread Prem Sure
I did recently. it includes MLib & Graphx too and I felt like exam content
covered all topics till 1.3 and not the > 1.3 versions of spark.


On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Janardhan Karri 
wrote:

> I am planning to do that with databricks
> http://go.databricks.com/spark-certified-developer
>
> Regards,
> Janardhan
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Timothy Spann 
> wrote:
>
>> I was wondering that as well.
>>
>> Also is it fully updated for 1.6?
>>
>> Tim
>> http://airisdata.com/
>> http://sparkdeveloper.com/
>>
>>
>> From: naga sharathrayapati 
>> Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 at 11:36 PM
>> To: "user@spark.apache.org" 
>> Subject: Spark Certification
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> I am planning on taking Spark Certification and I was wondering If one
>> has to be well equipped with  MLib & GraphX as well or not ?
>>
>> Please advise
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
>