Re: Secondary Storage Maintenance and moving networks

2024-05-24 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Marty,

Your assumptions on the impact of a secondary storage offline situation are 
correct.
For the VRs you can stop and start them. You may want to make sure that the 
corresponding virtual network in the xenserver for public network VLAN is 
deleted before starting the VR.

-Jithin

From: Marty Godsey 
Date: Thursday, 23 May 2024 at 11:56 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Secondary Storage Maintenance and moving networks
Hello all,

Quick question. It's time to update the storage for our secondary storage 
array. However, I don’t see a way to put the secondary storage into maintenance 
mode. Based on how secondary storage is used, I assume that if the backend goes 
offline, I will lose access to templates, ISOs, snapshots, the ability to make 
snapshots, etc. until the storage is back up, correct? Other than this, are 
there no other “concerns”?

Second question. I am currently using the Advanced networking type on XCP-NG.  
Currently the public network is residing on a bond that I want to go away. If I 
change the xennetworklabel in the Zone settings, would I just need to reboot 
the vRouters to create them on the correct bond? This is assuming everything 
all setup on the bond side of course.

Thank you for the help. 


 



Re: Secondary storage system VM agent state and web UI wrong password

2024-05-02 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Hanis,

You can find the removed template URL using the SQL query below, you can 
register a new one.

select url from vm_template where type='BUILTIN';


-Jithin

From: Hanis Irfan 
Date: Wednesday, 1 May 2024 at 10:39 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: RE: Secondary storage system VM agent state and web UI wrong password
I've solved the state issue by restarting MS service. Thanks for the link 
Jithin!

Just another question, I've removed the built-in CentOS template because it was 
not being downloaded because of previous issue.

Is there a way for me to get back the template?

Best Regards,

Hanis Irfan
Cloud Infrastructure Engineer | Nebula Systems Sdn Bhd
Email: hanis.ir...@nebula-sys.com
Website: https://www.nebula-sys.com

 


-Original Message-
From: Jithin Raju 
Sent: Tuesday, 30 April, 2024 12:27
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Secondary storage system VM agent state and web UI wrong password

For the SSVM issue this article might help you, specifically check for the 
management server IP connectivity on port 8250.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templates%2C+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting

Regarding the login issue you mentioned I am not sure about cause, I have faced 
this as well some times.

-Jithin

From: Hanis Irfan 
Date: Tuesday, 30 April 2024 at 8:10 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Secondary storage system VM agent state and web UI wrong password I’m 
currently learning CS and setting up a POC environment.

Two system VMs is running on the same KVM host in my 3 KVM host cluster. 
However, the secondary storage VM Agent state is shown as Connecting.
I’ve SSH into the secondary storage VM and can assure that it can reach the 
Internet and management network.
This hinders the zone to access to NFS secondary storage that I’ve added. I 
can’t add/create new ISOs and templates for VM.
I tried deleting the secondary storage VM and let it recreate automatically. 
The new VM agent state is also the same.

[cid:image002.png@01DA9AEA.AE5CE800]

Also, I’ve an issue with the web UI loading for a long time if I entered a 
wrong password. I believe it should just throw an error.
I have to reopen or remove my browser cache back in order to try login back in.
Produced the same issue on both Firefox and Opera incognito/private mode.
This happens only for default admin user. If I enter a non-existing account, 
I’ll get “Error 531: Failed to authenticate user dcerwv in domain 1; please 
provide valid credentials”.


Best Regards,

Hanis Irfan
Cloud Infrastructure Engineer | Nebula Systems Sdn Bhd
Email: hanis.ir...@nebula-sys.com<mailto:hanis.ir...@nebula-sys.com>
Website: 
https://www.nebula-sys.com<https://www.nebula-sys.com/><https://www.nebula-sys.com%3chttps:/www.nebula-sys.com/%3e>







Re: Guest VM connecting DC NAS

2024-04-29 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Nixon,

In an isolated guest network you could create a guest instance and use it as a 
NAS?
In a shared network you will have more flexibility in using existing NAS in the 
cloudstack provisioned guest instances.

-Jithin

From: Nixon Varghese K S 
Date: Saturday, 27 April 2024 at 7:04 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Guest VM connecting DC NAS
Hi All,

The optimum way to get NFS storage on the ACS guest VM is what we're
attempting to determine.This test environment is set up for advanced
networking on ACS (4.19.1).

ACS Portal: 10.10.40.252
NFS server: 10.10.40.250
KVM host: 172.16.0.100 (Have two network interface cards, one for private
use (cloudbr0) and the other for public use (cloudbr1))

ACS Management Range: 172.16.0.10–172.16.0.50 (cloudbr0)
ACS Public Range: Public IP RANGE (cloudbr1)

I had trunked KVM Privet NIC to talk to the ACS and NFS subnets. So through
172.16.0.0, I can communicate with the 10.10.40.0 network.

When I launch a VM with an isolated network of 10.1.1.5, it creates a VR
with 3 NICs (eth0: 10.1.1.1, eth1: control, and eth2: public). I need to
mount an NFS server with this guest VM. While checking the VR route, I can
see the default route to the public NIC. Through that NIC, I won't get the
10.10.40.250 system as it passed out from KVM through cloudbr1.

It is not advised to trunk KVM host cloudbr1 NIC and allow 10.10.40.250
traffic to route through the public network. What, in this particular
situation, will be the best course of action? I'm eager to hear your
thoughts.

With Regards,
Nixon Varghese

 



Re: Secondary storage system VM agent state and web UI wrong password

2024-04-29 Thread Jithin Raju
For the SSVM issue this article might help you, specifically check for the 
management server IP connectivity on port 8250.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM%2C+templates%2C+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting

Regarding the login issue you mentioned I am not sure about cause, I have faced 
this as well some times.

-Jithin

From: Hanis Irfan 
Date: Tuesday, 30 April 2024 at 8:10 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Secondary storage system VM agent state and web UI wrong password
I’m currently learning CS and setting up a POC environment.

Two system VMs is running on the same KVM host in my 3 KVM host cluster. 
However, the secondary storage VM Agent state is shown as Connecting.
I’ve SSH into the secondary storage VM and can assure that it can reach the 
Internet and management network.
This hinders the zone to access to NFS secondary storage that I’ve added. I 
can’t add/create new ISOs and templates for VM.
I tried deleting the secondary storage VM and let it recreate automatically. 
The new VM agent state is also the same.

[cid:image002.png@01DA9AEA.AE5CE800]

Also, I’ve an issue with the web UI loading for a long time if I entered a 
wrong password. I believe it should just throw an error.
I have to reopen or remove my browser cache back in order to try login back in.
Produced the same issue on both Firefox and Opera incognito/private mode.
This happens only for default admin user. If I enter a non-existing account, 
I’ll get “Error 531: Failed to authenticate user dcerwv in domain 1; please 
provide valid credentials”.


Best Regards,

Hanis Irfan
Cloud Infrastructure Engineer | Nebula Systems Sdn Bhd
Email: hanis.ir...@nebula-sys.com
Website: https://www.nebula-sys.com


 



Re: Avoid re-redownloading URLs when migrating secondary storage

2024-04-25 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Mevludin,

Just curious about how you are migrating the secondary storage. Are you using 
the CloudStack feature to migrate data across secondary storage?
So you added a new secondary storage and cloudstack already started syncing the 
public templates from URLs?

-Jithin

From: Pearl d'Silva 
Date: Friday, 26 April 2024 at 3:11 AM
To: users 
Subject: Re: Avoid re-redownloading URLs when migrating secondary storage
Hi Mevludin,

When migrating data to another secondary store, it only considers private 
templates and public templates with no url - those which are created from 
snapshots or volumes. Public templates with URLs are automatically 
synced(downloaded) on to the newly added secondary store. So, they aren't 
ideally getting duplicated on the new secondary store.

Regards,
Pearl



 



From: Mevludin Blazevic 
Sent: April 25, 2024 4:51 AM
To: users 
Subject: Avoid re-redownloading URLs when migrating secondary storage


Hi all,

it looks like with every secondary storage migration Cloudstack tries to 
re-download all templates with URLs instead of simply grabbing the already 
downloaded template from the old image store. If that's true, how to avoid that 
behaviour?

Mevludin



Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.0 RC2

2024-04-17 Thread Jithin Raju
+1 tested the usual VM, network, and storage operations.


-Jithin

From: João Jandre 
Date: Friday, 12 April 2024 at 5:07 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , 
users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.0 RC2
Hi All,

I've created a 4.18.2.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up
for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.18.2.0-RC20240412T0825
Commit: 154566f914c778d448d4ab07b47b2db874bbf982

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.18.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 488D90DA107445E3243D162606F3CEC65B335790):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 120 hours (due to the weekend).

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

 



Re: CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM) Not Ready

2024-04-15 Thread Jithin Raju
You can restart the SSVM or the ‘cloud’ agent in SSVM to trigger downloading.

-Jithin

From: Embedded 
Date: Monday, 15 April 2024 at 10:16 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM) Not Ready



On Monday 15 April 2024 11:28:11 AM (+07:00), Jithin Raju wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Can you check the progress it must be still downloading.
>

nope, dont see where its doing anything, is it possible to trigger somehow 
manually from cli  ???

> -Jithin
>
> From: Embedded 
> Date: Monday, 15 April 2024 at 9:00 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Subject: CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM) Not Ready
> just deployed a fresh cs 4.19 got the host up, system vms are running, but
> template vm says
>
> CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM) Not Ready
>
>
> ideas? did i miss something?
>
> --
> Sent with Vivaldi Mail. Download Vivaldi for free at vivaldi.com
>
>
>
>

--
Sent with Vivaldi Mail. Download Vivaldi for free at vivaldi.com

 



Re: CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM) Not Ready

2024-04-14 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi,

Can you check the progress it must be still downloading.

-Jithin

From: Embedded 
Date: Monday, 15 April 2024 at 9:00 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM) Not Ready
just deployed a fresh cs 4.19 got the host up, system vms are running, but
template vm says

CentOS 5.5(64-bit) no GUI (KVM) Not Ready


ideas? did i miss something?

--
Sent with Vivaldi Mail. Download Vivaldi for free at vivaldi.com

 



Re: XenServer vs XCP-NG

2024-04-10 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi ,

Here is the list of XCP-ng supported versions for ACS 4.19 :
XCP-ng 7.4.0, 7.6.0, 8.0.0, 8.1.0, 8.2.0 [1]

[1] http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.19.0.0/releasenotes/compat.html

-Jithin

From: Embedded 
Date: Wednesday, 10 April 2024 at 6:44 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: XenServer vs XCP-NG
Sorry I have to ask, I see XenServer is listed, but i donbt see any
documentation for XCP-NG,
i know it was previously supported. Is it still supported and what is the
supported versions? as 3.0
is now in the wild. Thanks

--
Sent with Vivaldi Mail. Download Vivaldi for free at vivaldi.com

 



Re: New PMC member: Slavka Peleva

2024-04-10 Thread Jithin Raju
Congratulations Slavka!

-Jithin

From: Ivet Petrova 
Date: Wednesday, 10 April 2024 at 4:41 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org , dev 

Subject: Fwd: New PMC member: Slavka Peleva
Hello all,

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Slavka Peleva to become a PMC member and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.

Slavka has contributed in the past and has shown effort to make the
project run smoothly

Please join me in congratulating Slavka!


Best regards,




 



Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.0 RC1

2024-04-09 Thread Jithin Raju
+1 , verified with a few rounds of testing.

-Jithin

From: João Jandre 
Date: Saturday, 6 April 2024 at 12:41 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , 
users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.2.0 RC1
Hi All,

I've created a 4.18.2.0 release (RC1), with the following artifacts up
for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.18.2.0-RC20240405T1541
Commit: 0d19ffa61c76f592c77ea04a982e15e8575ceb45

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same
location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.18.2.0/

PGP release keys (signed using 488D90DA107445E3243D162606F3CEC65B335790):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 120 hours (due to the weekend).

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
indicate "(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

 



Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0

2024-04-08 Thread Jithin Raju
+1 based on my tests.

-Jithin

From: Boris Stoyanov 
Date: Monday, 8 April 2024 at 2:53 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org , 
d...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0
+1 (binding), based on Kiran’s testing.

Bobby.

From: Kiran Chavala 
Date: Thursday, 4 April 2024 at 9:30
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , 
users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0
Hi All,

Reminder – terraform 0.5.0  is up for testing and voting.

Regards.
Kiran

From: Rohit Yadav 
Date: Wednesday, 3 April 2024 at 9:43 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , 
users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0
+1 (binding)

Tested vm deployment using 0.5.0-pre.

Regards.









 



From: Kiran Chavala 
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 2:55:40 PM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; 
users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0

Hi ALL

I've created a CloudStack Terraform Provider v0.5.0 release, with the following 
artifacts up for a vote:

Git Branch and Commit SH:

https://github.com/cloudstack/terraform-provider-cloudstack

Commit: 7c682bf17bebf40837a30ebcca811fc7b8785a15

Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/terraform-provider-0.5.0/

PGP release keys (signed using E03379CB066175FAC2BC9E027B3F1C5E93F97FAB):
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS

Vote will be open for 72 hours.

For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate 
"(binding)" with their vote?

[ ] +1  approve
[ ] +0  no opinion
[ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)

For users convenience, they can use this 0.5.0-pre build 
https://registry.terraform.io/providers/cloudstack/cloudstack/0.5.0-pre for 
testing purposes.
The binaries are here: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/releases/tag/v0.5.0-pre


Regards
Kiran Chavala


Re: Unexpected Behaviour - Deploy C

2024-04-07 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Ricardo,

Can you check the ownership of the deployed instances although they are listed 
for admin?

-Jithin

From: Ricardo Pertuz 
Date: Saturday, 6 April 2024 at 12:37 AM
To: Vivek Kumar via users 
Subject: Unexpected Behaviour - Deploy C
Hi Community

Using  CloudMonkey 6.1.0 with Regular User keys (no admin or domain admin)  on 
a 4.19.0.1 ACS,  if I run the command

deploy virtualmachine size=20 zoneid=xx serviceofferingid=xxx 
templateid=xx networkids=xx

Without the project id I can deploy instances in default view of the Admin 
Account which seems to be a security issue.  Looks like it’s only checking on 
the network permissions that belongs to user.


Atte,

Ricardo Pertuz


 



Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rene Peinthor as committer

2024-03-31 Thread Jithin Raju
Congratulations Rene.

-Jithin

From: Daan Hoogland 
Date: Friday, 29 March 2024 at 1:41 PM
To: users , dev 
Cc: PMC 
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rene Peinthor as committer
devs and users,

The PMC have asked Rene Peinthor to become a committer to the Apache
CloudStack project and they  have accepted.

Please join me in congratulating Rene.

--
Daan

 



Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Chair & VP Apache CloudStack Project - Daniel Salvador

2024-03-21 Thread Jithin Raju
Thanks, Rohit and congratulations Daniel!

-Jithin

From: Rohit Yadav 
Date: Thursday, 21 March 2024 at 7:15 PM
To: dev , users , 

Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Chair & VP Apache CloudStack Project - Daniel 
Salvador
All,

It gives me great pleasure to announce that the ASF board has
accepted CloudStack PMC resolution of Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador as
the next PMC Chair / VP of the Apache CloudStack project.

I would like to thank everyone for the support I've received over the past
year.

Please join me in congratulating Daniel, the new CloudStack PMC Chair / VP.

Best Regards,
Rohit Yadav

 



Re: host in alert mode

2024-03-11 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Francisco,

Is there any other error message besides this for the host start-up?

-Jithin

From: Francisco Arencibia Quesada 
Date: Monday, 11 March 2024 at 8:44 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: host in alert mode
Good morning guys,

I'm having the following issue :
Cannot transit agent status with event AgentDisconnected for host 154,
management server id is 117266040518341,Unable to transition to a new state
from Creating via AgentDisconnected

The host appears in Alert mode and I can't start any machine. The
underlying hypervisor is XenServer XCP-ng

Kind regards.


--
*Francisco Arencibia Quesada.*
*DevOps Engineer*

 



Re: new committer: Vishesh Jindal (vishesh)

2024-02-26 Thread Jithin Raju
Congratulations Vishesh.

-Jithin

From: Daan Hoogland 
Date: Monday, 26 February 2024 at 7:35 PM
To: users , dev 
Subject: new committer: Vishesh Jindal (vishesh)
users and devs,

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Vishesh Jindal to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.

Being a committer enables easier contribution to the
project since there is no need to go via the patch
submission process. This should enable better productivity.

Please join me in congratulating Vishesh.

--
on behalf of the PMC, Daan

 



Re: CPU Core Consumption High

2024-02-19 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Bharat,

The VM’s CPU and Memory capacity won’t be released by cloudstack instantly 
after a stop. It is reserved for starting them upto 
‘capacity.skipcounting.hours’. You could reduce this value in the global 
settings.

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Monday, 19 February 2024 at 4:18 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: CPU Core Consumption High
Hi Wei,

Sure I will do that. Thanks for the suggestion.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_527882427]

From: Wei ZHOU 
Date: Monday, 19 February 2024 at 3:37 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: CPU Core Consumption High
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi,

Can you perform the same steps again ? If the result is same, you can
create an issue on github: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/new


-Wei



On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 10:30, Bharat Bhushan Saini
 wrote:

> Hi Wei,
>
>
>
> First I did poweroff from inside the vm the it is going off but the status
> show that it is running then I do turned off from the UI as well then
> status shows in UI stopped
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Bharat Saini
>
>
>
> [image: signature_615347824]
>
>
>
> *From: *Wei ZHOU 
> *Date: *Monday, 19 February 2024 at 2:45 PM
> *To: *users@cloudstack.apache.org 
> *Subject: *Re: CPU Core Consumption High
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any
> action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Did you poweroff from inside the VM or on cloudstack UI ?
>
> -Wei
>
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2024 at 09:53, Bharat Bhushan Saini
>  wrote:
>
> > Hi Wei/Darren,
> >
> >
> >
> > The issue was again trigged after the enable the
> resource.count.running.vms.only
> > option.
> > I shut down all the vm’s but the resource utilization is same as before
> > when vm’s are running.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks and Regards,
> >
> > Bharat Saini
> >
> >
> >
> > [image: signature_2781584380]
> >
> >
> >
> > *From: *Wei ZHOU 
> > *Date: *Tuesday, 13 February 2024 at 12:59 AM
> > *To: *users@cloudstack.apache.org 
> > *Subject: *Re: CPU Core Consumption High
> >
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any
> > action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.
> >
> >
> > +1.
> >
> > The setting was introduced in 4.14 by my PR
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/3760
> > However, to keep backwards compatibility, the default value was set to
> > false, which does not make sense IMHO.
> >
> > -Wei
> >
> > 在 2024年2月12日星期一,Darren Cole  写道:
> >
> > > This caught me before as well.
> > > By default resource.count.running.vms.only is set to false, so
> resources
> > > are counted for all VMs.
> > > On clusters I run I set this to true so that only running VMs are
> counted
> > > for resource use.
> > >
> > > I have not tested 4.19 yet, but assume the setting stayed the same.
> > > There are also some similar/related settings to determine how running
> > > resources are counted.
> > > Some of these are specific what is backing the VMs.
> > > ie KVM, Xen, etc.
> > >
> > > Darren
> > > --
> > > This e-mail is confidential. Any distribution, use or copying of this
> > > e-mail or the information it contains other than by the intended
> > recipient
> > > is forbidden. If you are not the intended recipient, please advise the
> > > sender (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately and delete this
> > e-mail.
> > >
> > >
> > > From: "Bharat Bhushan Saini" 
> > > To: "users" 
> > > Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2024 11:14:58 PM
> > > Subject: CPU Core Consumption High
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I am facing an issue regarding the core consumption by the cloudstack.
> I
> > > started 2 vm with 6 cores and it takes 18 cores but when I poweroff the
> > vm
> > > the cores remains same in the dashboard.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks and Regards,
> > >
> > > Bharat Saini
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Disclaimer: --
> > > This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated
> > > addressee and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this
> email
> > > is meant exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals
> > > other than the addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of
> > > Kloudspot's proprietary rights. If you are not the intended recipient,
> > > please return this email to the sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the
> > > security or error-free transmission of e-mail communications.
> Information
> > > could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or
> > > incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot shall not be
> liable
> > > for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.
> > >
> >
> > --- Disclaimer: --
> > This message and 

Re: Shallow Provision and K8s Docs

2024-02-15 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Bharat,

I believe you are looking for CPU and Memory overcommit.

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Friday, 16 February 2024 at 11:27 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Shallow Provision and K8s Docs
Hi All,

Is there any feature is available in cloudstack by which we can use thin 
provision of CPU and RAM. Reason behind this is that the cloudstack confirm all 
cpu cores I gave but in reality the intances is not using that much of core. As 
a result I can’t create more instances in the cloudstack.

If possible please share the enabling feature of Kubernetes and configuration 
doc related to Kubernetes in cloudstack.
Thanks in advance.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_714485635]

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.

 



Re: new website is life

2024-02-07 Thread Jithin Raju
It looks great!

-Jithin

From: Daan Hoogland 
Date: Wednesday, 7 February 2024 at 1:53 PM
To: dev , users 
Subject: new website is life
People,
we brought the new website. Please all have a look at
https://cloudstack.apache.org

thanks for any feedback

--
Daan

 



Re: VM Networking

2024-02-02 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Bharat,

The image is displayed but I am assuming you configured egress rules to allow 
external network/internet access.

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Friday, 2 February 2024 at 5:17 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: VM Networking
Hi Jayanth,

I think if nameserver was wrongly configured then I am unable to upload in 
cloudstack environment.
I think issue is related to something egress rule.

[cid:image003.png@01DA55FB.9B639D40]

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_3636235028]

From: Jayanth Reddy 
Date: Friday, 2 February 2024 at 5:08 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: VM Networking
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hello Bharath,
Please check the nameservers defined for your zone at 
https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/installguide/configuration.html#id4
 focus specifically on Internal DNS.


Thanks


Get Outlook for Android

 



From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 4:59:31 pm
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: VM Networking

Hi All,

Cloudstack Version: 4.18
The Instances are not connected with the internet and documentation for that.
The virtual router is able to ping 8.8.8.8 but it is not recognizing the 
google.com.
Kindly help for the resolvent.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_4261242086]

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.


Re: Snapshot download

2024-01-31 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Jimmy,

This feature is not available yet (others may confirm), could you open a 
feature request?

-Jithin

From: Jimmy Huybrechts 
Date: Wednesday, 31 January 2024 at 9:38 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Snapshot download
Hi,

While doing some last tests before production I noticed there is no option to 
download a vm snapshot (including memory if saved), now for some law 
enforcement cases they will request such a snapshot with memory (after proper 
warrants of course). How to download these in this case? Even if it needs to be 
done manually from shell. Not being able to do it is not really an option here 
unfortunately.

--
Jimmy

 



Re: Issues migrating primary storage

2024-01-21 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Jeremy,

I don’ t think cloudstack migrates all the volumes on the primary storage when 
you put it into maintenance.

-Jithin

From: Jeremy Hansen 
Date: Saturday, 20 January 2024 at 4:21 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Issues migrating primary storage
I’m trying to put my NFS primary storage in to maintenance mode, which I 
believe is supposed to migrate all of its storage, correct?  The problem is I 
don’t know how to get a status on this job?  I can’t really tell if it’s 
working.  Management server doesn’t really have anything in the logs…. I don’t 
see any new images or images growing on the Ceph side.  So I just don’t know if 
it’s working or how far along the migration is.

-jeremy




 

On Friday, Jan 19, 2024 at 12:34 AM, Jeremy Hansen 
mailto:jer...@skidrow.la>> wrote:
I’m still having issues.  Is it unreasonable to migrate 1TB images over a 10G 
network?  Any other ideas of things to try would be much appreciated.

-jeremy



On Wednesday, Jan 17, 2024 at 12:49 PM, Jeremy Hansen 
mailto:jer...@skidrow.la>> wrote:
Extending these timeouts in the “wait” configs seems to have helped.  One of my 
1TB volumes is finally migrating.

WHat’s I’ve noticed is if I allocate a new 1TB volume, I can migrate this 
between NFS and Ceph and it takes only about a 1 minute.  I assume this is 
because it’s “thin provisioned” and there’s no actual data on the volume.

But these other volumes I’m trying to move are also “thin provisioned” but 
they’re a part of a LVM group.  Does making a thin provisioned device part of a 
LVM group defeat the thin provisioning?  I know these volumes weren’t full, but 
I thought perhaps there’s a chance that since it’s a pv in a LVM config, that 
maybe that defeats the thin provisioning and it counts it as a full 1TB volume? 
 I’m just spitballing but I’m trying to understand how this works so we can do 
the right thing when provisioning additional volumes.

Also, the behavior I’m seeing is it takes a very long time before I see the 
block image show up on the Ceph side.  Perhaps it preallocated a image before 
copying the data?  But it seemed strange that I wouldn’t immidiately see the 
image appear on the Ceph side after initiating a migration.  It’s hard to see 
what’s actually going on from the logs and the interface.

Thanks
-jeremy



On Tuesday, Jan 16, 2024 at 11:29 PM, Jeremy Hansen 
mailto:jer...@skidrow.la>> wrote:
I changed copy.volume.wait to 72000


But I just noticed:


kvm.storage.online.migration.wait and kvm.storage.offline.migration.wait.  
Worth changing this?



Thanks
-jeremy


On Tuesday, Jan 16, 2024 at 11:01 PM, Jithin Raju 
mailto:jithin.r...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
Hi Jeremy,

Have you checked the ‘wait’ parameter? Used as wait * 2 timeout.

-Jithin

From: Jeremy Hansen 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 12:14 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Issues migrating primary storage
Unfortunately the upgrade didn’t help:

Resource [StoragePool:3] is unreachable: Volume 
[{"name”:”bigdisk","uuid":"8f24b8a6-229a-4311-9ddc-d6c6acb89aca"}] migration 
failed due to [com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to copy 
/mnt/11cd19d0-f207-3d01-880f-8d01d4b15020/8f24b8a6-229a-4311-9ddc-d6c6acb89aca 
to 5837f4e6-9307-43a9-a50c-8c9c885f25e8.qcow2].



Anything else I can try? I’m trying to move away from NFS completely.

-jeremy






On Tuesday, Jan 16, 2024 at 7:06 AM, Suresh Kumar Anaparti 
mailto:sureshkumar.anapa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Jeremy,

Can you extend with the config 'migratewait' and check.

Regards,
Suresh

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 1:45 PM Jeremy Hansen 
wrote:


I have some large volumes I’m trying to migrate from NFS to Ceph/RBD. 1TB
volumes. These inevitably times out. I extended these configs:

copy.volume.wait=72000
job.cancel.threshold.minutes=480
job.expire.minutes=1440

This helped with smaller volumes but large once still eventually fail.

2024-01-16 07:50:25,929 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-8:null) (logid:) Seq 1-5583619113009291196:
Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 20558852646968, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer":{"result":"false","details":"com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException:
Failed to copy
/mnt/11cd19d0-f207-3d01-880f-8d01d4b15020/861a6692-e746-4401-9cda-bd791b7d3b5e
to
b7acadc8-34a1-4d7a-8040-26368dafc21d.qcow2","wait":"0","bypassHostMaintenance":"false"}}]
}

2024-01-16 07:50:26,698 DEBUG [c.c.s.VolumeApiServiceImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-41:ctx-e5baf6dc job-1175/job-1176 ctx-bc7b188b)
(logid:d7d98b81) Failed to migrate volume
com.cloud.exception.StorageUnavailableException: Resource [StoragePool:3]
is unreachable: Volume
[{"name":"sequencingdata","uuid":"861a6692-e746-4401-9cda-bd791b7d3b5e"}]
migration failed due to

Re: External IP Taken

2024-01-18 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Bharat,

Your Management server DNS seems to have resolved the hostname 
cstack.internal.com to its public IP? Is this the 
correct hostname for your host?

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Friday, 19 January 2024 at 10:31 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: External IP Taken
Hi All,

When adding a new host with zone why it system is taken the public ip which is 
not in the scope. Please refer the logs below,

Could not add host at [http://cstack.internal.com] with zone [9], pod [9] and 
cluster [9] due to: [ can't setup agent, due to java.io.IOException: There was 
a problem while connecting to 106.51.88.195:22 - There was a problem while 
connecting to 106.51.88.195:22].



Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_815284987]

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.

 



Re: Cloudstack Deployment

2024-01-17 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Bharat,

Can’t you use an RFC 1918 IP range behind NAT for cloudstack public traffic?

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:58 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi Jithin,

That is the major requirement as I am lacking to have the IP range. So that’s 
why I consider the create virtual network and that network NATing with the one 
interface and one IP.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_495948912]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:51 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

For uploading template ISO using the register URL method you just need to make 
sure that the URL is accessible from the public IP range provided in the zone.

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:43 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi Jithin and Suresh,

I appreciate you quick response. But Jithin I wondered about the networking 
part of cloudstack in which after deployment I will face error of iso and 
template uploading and Suresh in the document you refered I think the mbx 
required /16 natted network but I have only /24 natted!.
I didn’t want to stuck in network part as I doing the deployment 3rd time but 
didn’t get success in it.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_402736042]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:25 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

This one may be useful: 
https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-iaas-quick-build-guide/


-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:00 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi All,

I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm (hypervisor), mysql and nfs server on a 
single system.
System config –
RAM – 64GB
HDD – 1 TB
CPU – 16 Core i9 11th gen

Note – I also wanted a virtual network in the system which will communicate 
with my network through NAT as I am having on single NIC and don’t have the IP 
range to give in zone.
I need document or any video reference by which I can deploy cloudstack on a 
single server and able to provision the VM as the network played most important 
role in cloudstack.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_251517]

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.


--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.


--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.

 



Re: Cloudstack Deployment

2024-01-17 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Bharat,

For uploading template ISO using the register URL method you just need to make 
sure that the URL is accessible from the public IP range provided in the zone.

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:43 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi Jithin and Suresh,

I appreciate you quick response. But Jithin I wondered about the networking 
part of cloudstack in which after deployment I will face error of iso and 
template uploading and Suresh in the document you refered I think the mbx 
required /16 natted network but I have only /24 natted!.
I didn’t want to stuck in network part as I doing the deployment 3rd time but 
didn’t get success in it.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_402736042]

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:25 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack Deployment
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


Hi Bharat,

This one may be useful: 
https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-iaas-quick-build-guide/


-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:00 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi All,

I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm (hypervisor), mysql and nfs server on a 
single system.
System config –
RAM – 64GB
HDD – 1 TB
CPU – 16 Core i9 11th gen

Note – I also wanted a virtual network in the system which will communicate 
with my network through NAT as I am having on single NIC and don’t have the IP 
range to give in zone.
I need document or any video reference by which I can deploy cloudstack on a 
single server and able to provision the VM as the network played most important 
role in cloudstack.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_251517]

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.


--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.

 



Re: Cloudstack Deployment

2024-01-17 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Bharat,

This one may be useful: 
https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-iaas-quick-build-guide/


-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:00 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Cloudstack Deployment
Hi All,

I wanted to deploy the cloudstack, kvm (hypervisor), mysql and nfs server on a 
single system.
System config –
RAM – 64GB
HDD – 1 TB
CPU – 16 Core i9 11th gen

Note – I also wanted a virtual network in the system which will communicate 
with my network through NAT as I am having on single NIC and don’t have the IP 
range to give in zone.
I need document or any video reference by which I can deploy cloudstack on a 
single server and able to provision the VM as the network played most important 
role in cloudstack.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_251517]

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other than the 
addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of Kloudspot's proprietary 
rights. If you are not the intended recipient, please return this email to the 
sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the security or error-free transmission of 
e-mail communications. Information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, 
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot 
shall not be liable for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.

 



Re: Issues migrating primary storage

2024-01-16 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Jeremy,

Have you checked the ‘wait’ parameter? Used as wait * 2 timeout.

-Jithin

From: Jeremy Hansen 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 12:14 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Issues migrating primary storage
Unfortunately the upgrade didn’t help:

Resource [StoragePool:3] is unreachable: Volume 
[{"name”:”bigdisk","uuid":"8f24b8a6-229a-4311-9ddc-d6c6acb89aca"}] migration 
failed due to [com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to copy 
/mnt/11cd19d0-f207-3d01-880f-8d01d4b15020/8f24b8a6-229a-4311-9ddc-d6c6acb89aca 
to 5837f4e6-9307-43a9-a50c-8c9c885f25e8.qcow2].



Anything else I can try?  I’m trying to move away from NFS completely.

-jeremy




 

On Tuesday, Jan 16, 2024 at 7:06 AM, Suresh Kumar Anaparti 
mailto:sureshkumar.anapa...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Jeremy,

Can you extend with the config 'migratewait' and check.

Regards,
Suresh

On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 1:45 PM Jeremy Hansen 
wrote:


I have some large volumes I’m trying to migrate from NFS to Ceph/RBD. 1TB
volumes. These inevitably times out. I extended these configs:

copy.volume.wait=72000
job.cancel.threshold.minutes=480
job.expire.minutes=1440

This helped with smaller volumes but large once still eventually fail.

2024-01-16 07:50:25,929 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request]
(AgentManager-Handler-8:null) (logid:) Seq 1-5583619113009291196:
Processing: { Ans: , MgmtId: 20558852646968, via: 1, Ver: v1, Flags: 10,
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCmdAnswer":{"result":"false","details":"com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException:
Failed to copy
/mnt/11cd19d0-f207-3d01-880f-8d01d4b15020/861a6692-e746-4401-9cda-bd791b7d3b5e
to
b7acadc8-34a1-4d7a-8040-26368dafc21d.qcow2","wait":"0","bypassHostMaintenance":"false"}}]
}

2024-01-16 07:50:26,698 DEBUG [c.c.s.VolumeApiServiceImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-41:ctx-e5baf6dc job-1175/job-1176 ctx-bc7b188b)
(logid:d7d98b81) Failed to migrate volume
com.cloud.exception.StorageUnavailableException: Resource [StoragePool:3]
is unreachable: Volume
[{"name":"sequencingdata","uuid":"861a6692-e746-4401-9cda-bd791b7d3b5e"}]
migration failed due to [com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException:
Failed to copy
/mnt/11cd19d0-f207-3d01-880f-8d01d4b15020/861a6692-e746-4401-9cda-bd791b7d3b5e
to b7acadc8-34a1-4d7a-8040-26368dafc21d.qcow2].
at
org.apache.cloudstack.engine.orchestration.VolumeOrchestrator.migrateVolume(VolumeOrchestrator.java:1348)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor672.invoke(Unknown
Source)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at
org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:344)
at
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:198)
at
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:163)
at
org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:97)
at
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:186)
at
org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:215)
at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy227.migrateVolume(Unknown Source)
at
com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.orchestrateMigrateVolume(VolumeApiServiceImpl.java:3356)
at
com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.orchestrateMigrateVolume(VolumeApiServiceImpl.java:4721)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor671.invoke(Unknown
Source)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at
com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.handleVmWorkJob(VmWorkJobHandlerProxy.java:107)
at
com.cloud.storage.VolumeApiServiceImpl.handleVmWorkJob(VolumeApiServiceImpl.java:4735)
at jdk.internal.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor670.invoke(Unknown
Source)
at
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at
org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:344)
at
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:198)
at
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:163)
at
org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:97)
at
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:186)
at
org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:215)
at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy232.handleVmWorkJob(Unknown Source)
at
com.cloud.vm.VmWorkJobDispatcher.runJob(VmWorkJobDispatcher.java:102)
at

Re: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable: Host 11: Link is closed

2024-01-16 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Cristian,

Could you locate any stale management server record in the mshost table? If 
there is any ,specifically the one in the error ? update it as removed.

-Jithin

From: Cristian Ciobanu 
Date: Wednesday, 17 January 2024 at 4:16 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable: Host 
11: Link is closed
Looks like I have the same issue as I had some time ago...

"host time out after cloudstack management restore". Old topic, 2022.
 When I restored the backup on a different os, from Rocky to Ubuntu..  but
now I used the same os... Different version..

This looks like a bug. I'm trying to identify the route cause.


Regards,
Cristian

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024, 00:20  wrote:

> Hello,
>
>
>
> I have a CloudStack 4.18.1 restored from a DB backup due to server
> failure. The CloudStack is running; I see all the hosts with state 'Up',
> but it looks like it's stuck, nothing is working. I get a similar error for
> all hosts: “MgmtId 345050133919: Req: Resource [Host:11] is unreachable:
> Host 11: Link is closed,” even if the hosts are reachable from CloudStack
> and vSphere, where they are connected and manageable. I do not see any
> events in vSphere.
>
>
>
> Any suggestions as to why CloudStack does not see that the servers are
> reachable or why I get a timeout?
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Cristian
>

 



Re: new PMC member Harikrishna Patnala

2024-01-15 Thread Jithin Raju
Congratulations Hari!

-Jithin

From: Daan Hoogland 
Date: Monday, 15 January 2024 at 2:55 PM
To: dev , users 
Subject: new PMC member Harikrishna Patnala
users and dev,

The PMC have invited Harikrishna to join their ranks and he has
gracefully accepted. Please join me in congratulating Hari.

--
Daan

 



Re: Apache CloudStack Deployment Issue

2024-01-11 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Bharat,

Can you check the VLAN configuration on the switch ports? Make sure the SSVM 
vNICs are on the expected bridges?

-Jithin

From: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
Date: Thursday, 11 January 2024 at 11:38 PM
To: ustcweiz...@gmail.com , ji...@linservers.com 

Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Apache CloudStack Deployment Issue
Hi Wei and Jimmy,

I already deployed cloudstack version 4.18 with 1 management server included 
mysql and nfs in it and 1 kvm with libvirt, also both system was running on the 
ubuntu 22.04 LTS.
After adding a zone, facts are below,

  1.  Zone is enabled.
  2.  Host server is up and running.
  3.  Primary storage is add and up with nfs.
  4.  Secondary storage is added with nfs.
  5.  System VM’s of console and ssvm is up and running.
  6.  Default template is added Debian GNU and Centos 5.5 but Centos 5.5 is not 
in ready state.



Issues encountered,

  1.  When ISO has been adding then error encountered that “There is no 
secondary storage VM for downloading template to image store ISO-Store”.
  2.  When going to check vm through console it is not opened in the browser.
  3.  When logged in the ssvm from backend, vm is not able to ping google DNS 
and when ssvm-check.sh script run it is not able to ping it’s gateway as well.

Kindly help out from the configuration part. I also try wireguard for this but 
it is also not done yet.

Thanks and Regards,
Bharat Saini

[signature_3912993235]

From: Wei ZHOU 
Date: Thursday, 11 January 2024 at 6:26 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Apache CloudStack Deployment Issue
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any 
action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.


If you want to play or test cloudstack on a single server, you can try with
https://github.com/shapeblue/mbx

-Wei


On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 at 13:36, Bharat Bhushan Saini
 wrote:

> Hi Jimmy,
>
>
>
> It is ok with the nested virtualization but I want to try it.
>
> May in future I will move it to the dedicated infra.
>
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Bharat Saini
>
>
>
> [image: signature_3857218017]
>
>
>
> *From: *Jimmy Huybrechts 
> *Date: *Thursday, 11 January 2024 at 5:43 PM
> *To: *users@cloudstack.apache.org 
> *Subject: *Re: Apache CloudStack Deployment Issue
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Please verify the sender email address before taking any
> action, replying, clicking any link or opening any attachment.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I believe combining proxmox and cloudstack is not supported at all since
> proxmox does things with KVM in their own way.
> If you want to run Cloudstack on top of proxmox you would get nested
> virtualization.
>
> --
> Jimmy
>
> Van: Bharat Bhushan Saini 
> Datum: donderdag, 11 januari 2024 om 13:08
> Aan: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Onderwerp: Apache CloudStack Deployment Issue
> Hi All,
>
> May anyone help me for the deployment of the apache cloudstack on the
> proxmox infra.
> If anyone will help me I will be grateful to him.
> Kindly reply on that mail to make two way communication.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Bharat Saini
>
> [signature_1984116516]
>
> --- Disclaimer: --
> This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated
> addressee and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email
> is meant exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals
> other than the addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of
> Kloudspot's proprietary rights. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please return this email to the sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the
> security or error-free transmission of e-mail communications. Information
> could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or
> incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot shall not be liable
> for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.
>
> --- Disclaimer: --
> This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated
> addressee and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email
> is meant exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals
> other than the addressee constitutes misuse and an infringement of
> Kloudspot's proprietary rights. If you are not the intended recipient,
> please return this email to the sender. Kloudspot cannot guarantee the
> security or error-free transmission of e-mail communications. Information
> could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or
> incomplete, or contain viruses. Therefore, Kloudspot shall not be liable
> for any issues arising from the transmission of this email.
>

--- Disclaimer: --
This message and its contents are intended solely for the designated addressee 
and are proprietary to Kloudspot. The information in this email is meant 
exclusively for Kloudspot business use. Any use by individuals other 

Re: New committer: Alexandre Mattioli

2024-01-10 Thread Jithin Raju
Congratulations Alex.

-Jithin

From: Nux 
Date: Thursday, 11 January 2024 at 3:58 AM
To: Dev , Users 
Subject: New committer: Alexandre Mattioli
All,

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Alexandre Mattioli to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.

Alex has been instrumental in many features present today in Cloudstack,
with a focus on networking and VMWare:
- IPv6 static routing
- Edge Zones
- Autoscaling with VR
- VNF appliances
- VMWare NSX support
- Tungsten Fabric / OpenSDN
- Backup & recovery framework
- VLAN trunking and security policies in ESX
and so on.


Please join me in congratulating Alex!

 



Re: Template f2d39f0f-dc31-47a3-88a5-e02f0b892bcb failed to upload. Error details: Template f2d39f0f-dc31-47a3-88a5-e02f0b892bcb failed to upload as SSVM is either destroyed or SSVM agent not in 'Up'

2024-01-04 Thread Jithin Raju
erverHandler.java:65)
at 
io.netty.channel.SimpleChannelInboundHandler.channelRead(SimpleChannelInboundHandler.java:105)
at 
io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:374)
at 
io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:360)
at 
io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:352)
at 
io.netty.handler.codec.MessageToMessageDecoder.channelRead(MessageToMessageDecoder.java:102)
at 
io.netty.handler.codec.MessageToMessageCodec.channelRead(MessageToMessageCodec.java:111)
at 
io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:374)
at 
io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:360)
at 
io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:352)
at 
io.netty.handler.codec.ByteToMessageDecoder.fireChannelRead(ByteToMessageDecoder.java:328)
at 
io.netty.handler.codec.ByteToMessageDecoder.channelRead(ByteToMessageDecoder.java:302)
at 
io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:374)
at 
io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:360)
at 
io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:352)
at 
io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline$HeadContext.channelRead(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:1422)
at 
io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:374)
at 
io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:360)
at 
io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.fireChannelRead(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:931)
at 
io.netty.channel.nio.AbstractNioByteChannel$NioByteUnsafe.read(AbstractNioByteChannel.java:163)
at 
io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKey(NioEventLoop.java:700)
at 
io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeysOptimized(NioEventLoop.java:635)
at 
io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeys(NioEventLoop.java:552)
at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:514)
at 
io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$6.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:1044)
at 
io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74)
at 
io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)

Thanks,

Brian

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Wednesday, January 3, 2024 at 11:14 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Template f2d39f0f-dc31-47a3-88a5-e02f0b892bcb failed to upload. 
Error details: Template f2d39f0f-dc31-47a3-88a5-e02f0b892bcb failed to upload 
as SSVM is either destroyed or SSVM agent not in 'Up' state
Hi Brian,

Does the SSVM agent state shows ‘Up’? you should be able to find more 
information in the cloud.log of the SSVM.

-Jithin

From: Brian Fossmeyer 
Date: Thursday, 4 January 2024 at 12:39 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: FW: Template f2d39f0f-dc31-47a3-88a5-e02f0b892bcb failed to upload. 
Error details: Template f2d39f0f-dc31-47a3-88a5-e02f0b892bcb failed to upload 
as SSVM is either destroyed or SSVM agent not in 'Up' state
Hello,
I am trying to upload ISO’s from my desktop and having this issue. The ISO will 
upload to 100%, but then will generate this error and then will not ever get 
into a ready state. Both of the System VMs are in a running and in an up state.

Template  failed to upload. Error details: Template  failed to upload as SSVM is either destroyed or SSVM agent 
not in 'Up' state

Thanks
Brian




Brian Fossmeyer
Senior Systems Engineer, Technology

[Answers in Genesis]<https://answersingenesis.org/> [Creation Museum] 
<https://creationmuseum.org/>  [Ark Encounter] <https://arkencounter.com/>



 



Re: Template f2d39f0f-dc31-47a3-88a5-e02f0b892bcb failed to upload. Error details: Template f2d39f0f-dc31-47a3-88a5-e02f0b892bcb failed to upload as SSVM is either destroyed or SSVM agent not in 'Up'

2024-01-03 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Brian,

Does the SSVM agent state shows ‘Up’? you should be able to find more 
information in the cloud.log of the SSVM.

-Jithin

From: Brian Fossmeyer 
Date: Thursday, 4 January 2024 at 12:39 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: FW: Template f2d39f0f-dc31-47a3-88a5-e02f0b892bcb failed to upload. 
Error details: Template f2d39f0f-dc31-47a3-88a5-e02f0b892bcb failed to upload 
as SSVM is either destroyed or SSVM agent not in 'Up' state
Hello,
I am trying to upload ISO’s from my desktop and having this issue. The ISO will 
upload to 100%, but then will generate this error and then will not ever get 
into a ready state. Both of the System VMs are in a running and in an up state.

Template  failed to upload. Error details: Template  failed to upload as SSVM is either destroyed or SSVM agent 
not in 'Up' state

Thanks
Brian




Brian Fossmeyer
Senior Systems Engineer, Technology

[Answers in Genesis] [Creation Museum] 
  [Ark Encounter] 

 



Re: Replacing Existing Network

2023-12-20 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Marty,

I see an option to change the network offering for isolated networks on ‘Update 
Network’. Could you try that?

-Jithin

From: Marty Godsey 
Date: Thursday, 21 December 2023 at 1:51 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Replacing Existing Network
Hello,

I have some networks that are in use that are rate-limited to 200Mb. I want to 
replace these with a new network that has a higher limit. I saw that you could 
not increase an existing limit and seem to remember that someone said you had 
to create a new network offering and update but I don’t see that in the options.

How would I replace an existing network with one with a higher limit versus 
completely rebuilding the networks?

Thank you for the help.

Marty

 



Re: new committer: João Jandre Paraquetti

2023-12-18 Thread Jithin Raju
Congratulations João.

-Jithin

From: Daan Hoogland 
Date: Monday, 18 December 2023 at 6:17 PM
To: dev , users 
Subject: new committer: João Jandre Paraquetti
community,
The PMC have invited João Jandre Paraquetti to join the project as a
committer and the invitation was gratefully accepted.
Please join me in welcoming João.
Congratulations João,

--
Daan

 



Re: new committer Vladimir Petrov

2023-12-12 Thread Jithin Raju
Congratulations Vladi !

-Jithin

From: Daman Arora 
Date: Wednesday, 13 December 2023 at 11:06 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: users 
Subject: Re: new committer Vladimir Petrov
Congrats Vladimir!

On Wed, Dec 13, 2023, 11:05 a.m. Harikrishna Patnala <
harikrishna.patn...@shapeblue.com> wrote:

> Congratulations Vladi !
>
> Regards,
> Harikrishna
>
> From: Daan Hoogland 
> Date: Tuesday, 12 December 2023 at 3:22 PM
> To: dev , users 
> Subject: new committer Vladimir Petrov
> community,
>
> The PMC has decided Vladi to become a committer and he has gracefully
> accepted. Please join me in welcoming Vladi to the project as
> committer.
> Congratulations Vladi
>
> --
> Daan
>
>
>
>

 



Re: S3 Secondary Storage

2023-12-05 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Marty,

This PR seems to be related to your requirement:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7659


-Jithin

From: Marty Godsey 
Date: Tuesday, 5 December 2023 at 10:40 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: S3 Secondary Storage
I know you can add more than one secondary storage, but is there a way to 
restrict people from getting to one or the other?

Basically, I want to provide an option to my users where their snapshots can be 
sent to an S3 storage location offsite if they choose it. How do I provide 
access to that secondary or deny access to it?

 



Re: Host tags

2023-12-05 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Marty,

These ‘tags’ host parameters in the XAPI DB could be removed when we do 
operations like installing patches on the XCP-ng/XenServer. Once you force 
reconnect these hosts in the cloudstack it will add the tags and push the 
scripts and so on to configure the hosts again.

These tags identify the cloudstack scripts, and agent version installed in the 
host.

-Jithin

From: Marty Godsey 
Date: Tuesday, 5 December 2023 at 10:34 PM
To: Jithin Raju 
Subject: Re: Host tags
When looking at a host in XOA, you see tags like “cloud-heartbeat-blahblah” and 
“vmops-version-com.cloud.blahblah”.

Those are the tags I am referring to.

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Tuesday, December 5, 2023 at 1:17 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: Marty Godsey 
Subject: Re: Host tags
Hi Marty,

Just to confirm, you are asking about the cloudstack host tag or the xe 
host-param ‘tag’?

-Jithin





From: Nux 
Date: Tuesday, 5 December 2023 at 2:38 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: Marty Godsey 
Subject: Re: Host tags
Sounds good, thanks for clarifying.


On 2023-12-04 20:40, Marty Godsey wrote:
> Nux,
>
> They do. I have no other issues and the tags “magically appeared” so,
> idk.. But it didn’t seem to have any issues. Since there were no issues
> observed, I am not worried about troubleshooting.
>
> Marty
>
> From: Nux 
> Date: Friday, December 1, 2023 at 1:56 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: Host tags
> Hi,
>
> That could be XO's doing. I was hoping XO and cloudstack can co-exist
> peacefully, but this doesn't fill me with confidence.
>
>
>
> On 1 December 2023 08:42:35 GMT, Boris Stoyanov
>  wrote:
>> Marty,
>> We haven’t really observed a situation of tags being missing all of
>> the sudden, I don’t recall such issue. Feel free to add them once more
>> at the host.
>>
>> Bobby.
>>
>> From: Marty Godsey 
>> Date: Wednesday, 29 November 2023 at 22:26
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
>> Subject: Host tags
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> I am using XCP-NG for my hosts and use XOA to “manage” them. When I
>> say manage, I mean just use it for visibility into the cluster.
>> Cloudstack does all the work.
>>
>> I noticed today that my tags on the hosts are missing. It’s on one of
>> the hosts but not the other two. Is this a concern? How would I get
>> them back if needed?
>>
>> Marty
>>
>>
>>

 



Re: Host tags

2023-12-04 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Marty,

Just to confirm, you are asking about the cloudstack host tag or the xe 
host-param ‘tag’?

-Jithin

From: Nux 
Date: Tuesday, 5 December 2023 at 2:38 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: Marty Godsey 
Subject: Re: Host tags
Sounds good, thanks for clarifying.


On 2023-12-04 20:40, Marty Godsey wrote:
> Nux,
>
> They do. I have no other issues and the tags “magically appeared” so,
> idk.. But it didn’t seem to have any issues. Since there were no issues
> observed, I am not worried about troubleshooting.
>
> Marty
>
> From: Nux 
> Date: Friday, December 1, 2023 at 1:56 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Subject: Re: Host tags
> Hi,
>
> That could be XO's doing. I was hoping XO and cloudstack can co-exist
> peacefully, but this doesn't fill me with confidence.
>
>
>
> On 1 December 2023 08:42:35 GMT, Boris Stoyanov
>  wrote:
>> Marty,
>> We haven’t really observed a situation of tags being missing all of
>> the sudden, I don’t recall such issue. Feel free to add them once more
>> at the host.
>>
>> Bobby.
>>
>> From: Marty Godsey 
>> Date: Wednesday, 29 November 2023 at 22:26
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
>> Subject: Host tags
>> Hello guys,
>>
>> I am using XCP-NG for my hosts and use XOA to “manage” them. When I
>> say manage, I mean just use it for visibility into the cluster.
>> Cloudstack does all the work.
>>
>> I noticed today that my tags on the hosts are missing. It’s on one of
>> the hosts but not the other two. Is this a concern? How would I get
>> them back if needed?
>>
>> Marty
>>
>>
>>

 



Re: new committer Bryan Lima

2023-11-30 Thread Jithin Raju
Congratulations Bryan.

-Jithin

From: Daan Hoogland 
Date: Thursday, 30 November 2023 at 2:38 PM
To: dev , users 
Cc: PMC 
Subject: new committer Bryan Lima
All,

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Bryan Lima to become a PMC member and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.

Bryan has contributed himself and assisted in reviewing and testing
the work of others. He has shown to be responsive, constructive and
pleasant to work with.

please join me in congratulating Bryan

--
Daan

 



Re: new PMC member: Abhishek Kumar

2023-11-26 Thread Jithin Raju
Congratulations Abhishek.

-Jithin

From: Daan Hoogland 
Date: Thursday, 23 November 2023 at 2:11 PM
To: users , dev 
Subject: new PMC member: Abhishek Kumar
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Abhishek Kumar to become a PMC member and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.

Abhishek has contributed in the past and has shown effort to make the
project run smoothly. He is also the Release Manager for the upcoming
4.19 release.

please join me in congratulating Abhishek

--
Daan

 



Re: Cloudstack Still Trying to connect to secondary storage NFS after removing it.

2023-11-22 Thread Jithin Raju
Granwille,

The ISO that is mentioned in the below log snippets shows SSVM (not management 
server itself) is trying to download the file to NFS server 192.168.50.2. Is it 
the secondary storage you removed? If yes restart the SSVM. If management 
server is still attempting to connect to this NFS server/share you could 
unmount that share on the management server.


-Jithin

From: Granwille Strauss 
Date: Tuesday, 21 November 2023 at 9:39 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Cloudstack Still Trying to connect to secondary storage NFS after 
removing it.

Hi Guys

My cloud stack management server still wants to connect to a secondary NFS 
server. We have shutdown the NFS storage and we removed it from Cloudstack 
management via UI in the secondary storage area, we made sure to migrate all 
its existing data to another secondary NFS prior.

But now, when I load new templates or ISO the download fails and says it times 
out:
2023-11-21 10:00:02,665 DEBUG [c.c.a.t.Request] 
(qtp1312381159-9364:ctx-78f2d817 ctx-3bf3aa88) (logid:c4456add) Seq 
57-4037477065937751626: Sending  { Cmd , MgmtId: 66988330791812, via: 
57(s-189-VM), Ver: v1, Flags: 100011, 
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.DownloadCommand":{"hvm":"true","description":"Ubuntu
 22.04 LTS - Server Image","maxDownloadSizeInBytes":"(50,00 GB) 
53687091200","id":"237","resourceType":"TEMPLATE","installPath":"template/tmpl/2/237","_store":{"com.cloud.agent.api.to.NfsTO":{"_url":"nfs://192.168.50.2/mnt/datasecond","_role":"Image"}},"url":"https://releases.ubuntu.com/jammy/ubuntu-22.04.3-live-server-amd64.iso;,"format":"ISO","accountId":"2","name":"237-2-7d385757-227c-3660-a56c-1aaae59cacc3","secUrl":"nfs://192.168.50.2/mnt/datasecond","wait":"0","bypassHostMaintenance":"false"}}]
 }


2023-11-21 10:00:17,855 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl] 
(AgentManager-Handler-3:null) (logid:) SeqA 49-685551: Sending Seq 49-685551:  
{ Ans: , MgmtId: 66988330791812, via: 49, Ver: v1, Flags: 100010, 
[{"com.cloud.agent.api.AgentControlAnswer":{"result":"true","wait":"0","bypassHostMaintenance":"false"}}]
 }
2023-11-21 10:00:18,877 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] 
(secstorage-1:ctx-b3f89e5f) (logid:2e6365a0) Enabled non-edge zones available 
for scan: 16
2023-11-21 10:00:18,880 DEBUG [c.c.s.StatsCollector] 
(secstorage-1:ctx-b3f89e5f) (logid:2e6365a0) Verifying image storage [28]. 
Capacity: total=[223 GB], used=[33 MB], threshold=[89.9761581421%].
2023-11-21 10:00:18,881 DEBUG [c.c.s.StatsCollector] 
(secstorage-1:ctx-b3f89e5f) (logid:2e6365a0) Verifying image storage [29]. 
Capacity: total=[870 GB], used=[49 GB], threshold=[89.9761581421%].
2023-11-21 10:00:18,884 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] 
(secstorage-1:ctx-b3f89e5f) (logid:2e6365a0) Zone [16] is ready to launch 
secondary storage VM.

2023-11-21 10:00:32,659 DEBUG [c.c.s.d.DownloadListener] (Timer-7:ctx-b1d926d0) 
(logid:2a0029c2) Scheduling timeout at 3 ms, TEMPLATE: 237 at host 57
2023-11-21 10:00:32,659 DEBUG [c.c.s.d.DownloadListener] (Timer-7:ctx-b1d926d0) 
(logid:2a0029c2) NOT_DOWNLOADED first timeout: checking again , TEMPLATE: 237 
at host 57

Cloudstack server via dmesg also shows it remains trying to connect to the 
server:
[15529788.049090] sh (779409): drop_caches: 3
[15529800.675531] nfs: server  not responding, timed out
[15529805.476018] nfs: server  not responding, timed out
[15529814.180397] nfs: server  not responding, timed out
[15529847.965197] sh (785469): drop_caches: 3


Was there a correct way I had to process this? Or am I missing something?
--

Regards / Groete
[Image removed by sender.]
Granwille Strauss  //  Senior Systems Admin

e: granwi...@namhost.com
m: +264 81 323 1260
w: www.namhost.com

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by 
sender.][Image removed by 
sender.][Image removed by 
sender.][Image removed by 
sender.]

[Image removed by 
sender.]
Namhost Internet Services (Pty) Ltd,

24 Black Eagle Rd, Hermanus, 7210, RSA

The content of this message is confidential. If you have received it by 
mistake, please inform us by email reply and then delete the message. It is 
forbidden to copy, forward, or in any way reveal the contents of this message 
to anyone without our explicit consent. The integrity and security of this 
email cannot be guaranteed over the Internet. Therefore, the sender will not be 
held liable for any damage caused by the message. For our full privacy policy 
and disclaimers, please go to https://www.namhost.com/privacy-policy

[Image removed by sender. Powered 

Re: VM serial number change when instance stop/start

2023-11-20 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Jose,

I think currently cloudstack can’t set a fixed serial number on the instance 
creation on XCP-ng, are you able to set the serial number directly on XCP-ng? 
if possible you could open an improvement request in github.

-Jithin

From: José Sánchez 
Date: Monday, 20 November 2023 at 12:47 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: VM serial number change when instance stop/start
Hi.

We use XCP + CloudStack.

We have some software installed on VM's that depends on the VM serial
number for licensing.

When we stop and start the instance the VM serial number changes because
the VM is removed from the hypervisor during that action.

Is there any way to set a fixed serial number to the instances on creation
stage?

Thanks.

 



Re: IP Address Not Showing On UI

2023-11-15 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Carlo,

We don’t have to run the command manually cloudstack uses it internally.

-Jithin

From: Carlo Fernandez 
Date: Thursday, 16 November 2023 at 11:01 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: IP Address Not Showing On UI
Hi Jithin,

Thank you so much!

I’ve never used the guestfish command, but from the sample command it looks 
like this would have to be run manually for every guest VM.

Is there a way to automate this?

Thanks,

Carlo Fernandez

> On Nov 15, 2023, at 9:22 PM, Jithin Raju  wrote:
>
> Hi Carlo,
>
> Ideally, the guest IPs served by external DHCP would be fetched by the 
> management server via hypervisor, I haven’t used it with KVM recently.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53740797
>
> Getting DHCP IP from the VM by CS
>1.  Retrieve the IP from the Vm and update in the CS DB.
>   a. VmWare
>  With the help of vmware tools, Vm IP will be read from the 
> information by the hypervisor
>   Note: Required vmware tools needs to be installed in Vm.
>
> b.   XenServer
>   Retrieve the VM IP from XenServer using the below command by 
> passing the VM name.
>   #xe vm-list name-label= params=networks
>  The output is parsed to get the vm ip address.
>  Note: Windows VM requires PV drivers to be installed to get the 
> VM IP.
>
> c. KVM
>  Use the guestfish command in KVM host to read the VM dhcp lease 
> and parse it get the VM IP address.
>  #guestfish --ro -i -d i-2-21-VM download  
> /var/lib/dhclient/dhclient-eth0.leases  -
>
> Note: Reading IP using guestfish command works for only Linux 
> guest VMs.
>
>
> -Jithin
>
> From: Carlo Fernandez 
> Date: Thursday, 16 November 2023 at 9:52 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Subject: IP Address Not Showing On UI
> Hi folks,
>
> I got CloudStack up and running on a few KVM hosts and everything is working 
> as expected, except for one thing.
>
> Since the IP addresses for guest VMs are assigned by an external DHCP server, 
> the IP addresses assigned won’t show up in the UI.
>
> Is there any way to get these to show up? Any script or anything that I can 
> add to my images?
>
> Currently, users have to log in via the console to see the IP address so that 
> they can SSH into their VMs.
>
> I appreciate any help you can provide!
>
> Regards,
>
> Carlo Fernandez
>
>
>

 



Re: IP Address Not Showing On UI

2023-11-15 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Carlo,

Ideally, the guest IPs served by external DHCP would be fetched by the 
management server via hypervisor, I haven’t used it with KVM recently.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=53740797

Getting DHCP IP from the VM by CS
1.  Retrieve the IP from the Vm and update in the CS DB.
   a. VmWare
  With the help of vmware tools, Vm IP will be read from the 
information by the hypervisor
   Note: Required vmware tools needs to be installed in Vm.

 b.   XenServer
   Retrieve the VM IP from XenServer using the below command by 
passing the VM name.
   #xe vm-list name-label= params=networks
  The output is parsed to get the vm ip address.
  Note: Windows VM requires PV drivers to be installed to get the 
VM IP.

 c. KVM
  Use the guestfish command in KVM host to read the VM dhcp lease 
and parse it get the VM IP address.
  #guestfish --ro -i -d i-2-21-VM download  
/var/lib/dhclient/dhclient-eth0.leases  -

 Note: Reading IP using guestfish command works for only Linux 
guest VMs.


-Jithin

From: Carlo Fernandez 
Date: Thursday, 16 November 2023 at 9:52 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: IP Address Not Showing On UI
Hi folks,

I got CloudStack up and running on a few KVM hosts and everything is working as 
expected, except for one thing.

Since the IP addresses for guest VMs are assigned by an external DHCP server, 
the IP addresses assigned won’t show up in the UI.

Is there any way to get these to show up? Any script or anything that I can add 
to my images?

Currently, users have to log in via the console to see the IP address so that 
they can SSH into their VMs.

I appreciate any help you can provide!

Regards,

Carlo Fernandez

 



Re: Unable to add second host

2023-11-15 Thread Jithin Raju
If you have the steps to reproduce the issue it might be worth reporting the 
issue.

-Jithin

From: Jimmy Huybrechts 
Date: Wednesday, 15 November 2023 at 3:53 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Unable to add second host
Hi Jithin,

That was it actually, I filled in a guid in that table and now it added it, 
currently doing tests with it already :)

--
Jimmy

Van: Jithin Raju 
Datum: woensdag, 15 november 2023 om 05:15
Aan: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Onderwerp: Re: Unable to add second host
Hi Jimmy,

>Guid is not updated for cluster with specified cluster id
Could you verify whether there is any value for the ‘guid’ filed in the 
‘cluster’ table for this cluster, if its NULL generate a random UUID and update 
the field.

-Jithin

From: Jimmy Huybrechts 
Date: Tuesday, 14 November 2023 at 10:13 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Unable to add second host
Hi Gary,

I did that doing the fqdn indeed, just like the first host.

--
Jimmy

Van: Gary Dixon 
Datum: dinsdag, 14 november 2023 om 17:22
Aan: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Onderwerp: RE: Unable to add second host
Hi Jimmy

Did you try to add the host via its IP or FQDN - it looks like you need to add 
it via FQDN

[cid:image195681.png@8AB6B0A1.40521B2B]
Gary Dixon​
Senior Technical Consultant
[cid:image607471.png@6EABA39E.15C283A8]
0161 537 4980
 +44 7989717661
[cid:image039452.png@587E2583.30F76F95]
gary.di...@quadris.co.uk<mailto:gary.di...@quadris.co.uk>
[cid:image674966.png@DDFF6C88.15096CB3]
www.quadris.com<http://www.quadris.com>
[cid:image900790.png@68DA5719.E45F2990]
Innovation House, 12‑13 Bredbury Business Park
Bredbury Park Way, Bredbury, Stockport, SK6 2SN



 


-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Huybrechts 
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 4:18 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Unable to add second host

I'm trying to add a second host to my cluster now after the tests I did with 
having only one, however I get a Error 530 in the GUI and the management log 
says the following:

2023-11-14 17:11:33,491 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker] 
(qtp1278852808-495:ctx-1cea20ad ctx-5982a2e5) (logid:d7576e47) Received unknown 
parameters for command addHost. Unknown parameters : clustertype
2023-11-14 17:11:33,495 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiServer] (qtp1278852808-495:ctx-1cea20ad 
ctx-5982a2e5) (logid:d7576e47) unhandled exception executing api command: 
[Ljava.lang.String;@44dcd5ae
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Guid is not updated for 
cluster with specified cluster id; need to wait for hosts in this cluster to 
come up
at 
com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.discoverHosts(ResourceManagerImpl.java:640)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native 
Method)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at 
org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:344)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:198)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:163)
at 
org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:97)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:186)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:215)
at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy199.discoverHosts(Unknown Source)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.host.AddHostCmd.execute(AddHostCmd.java:136)
at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:163)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:782)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:603)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequestInContext(ApiServlet.java:347)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet$1.run(ApiServlet.java:154)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:55)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:102)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:52)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequest(ApiServlet.java:151)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.doPost(ApiServlet.java:110)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:665)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:750)
at 
org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder$NotAsync.service(ServletHolder.java:1450)
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:799)
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletH

Re: Unable to add second host

2023-11-14 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Jimmy,

>Guid is not updated for cluster with specified cluster id
Could you verify whether there is any value for the ‘guid’ filed in the 
‘cluster’ table for this cluster, if its NULL generate a random UUID and update 
the field.

-Jithin

From: Jimmy Huybrechts 
Date: Tuesday, 14 November 2023 at 10:13 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Unable to add second host
Hi Gary,

I did that doing the fqdn indeed, just like the first host.

--
Jimmy

Van: Gary Dixon 
Datum: dinsdag, 14 november 2023 om 17:22
Aan: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Onderwerp: RE: Unable to add second host
Hi Jimmy

Did you try to add the host via its IP or FQDN - it looks like you need to add 
it via FQDN

[cid:image195681.png@8AB6B0A1.40521B2B]
Gary Dixon​
Senior Technical Consultant
[cid:image607471.png@6EABA39E.15C283A8]
0161 537 4980
 +44 7989717661
[cid:image039452.png@587E2583.30F76F95]
gary.di...@quadris.co.uk
[cid:image674966.png@DDFF6C88.15096CB3]
www.quadris.com
[cid:image900790.png@68DA5719.E45F2990]
Innovation House, 12‑13 Bredbury Business Park
Bredbury Park Way, Bredbury, Stockport, SK6 2SN
 


-Original Message-
From: Jimmy Huybrechts 
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2023 4:18 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Unable to add second host

I'm trying to add a second host to my cluster now after the tests I did with 
having only one, however I get a Error 530 in the GUI and the management log 
says the following:

2023-11-14 17:11:33,491 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker] 
(qtp1278852808-495:ctx-1cea20ad ctx-5982a2e5) (logid:d7576e47) Received unknown 
parameters for command addHost. Unknown parameters : clustertype
2023-11-14 17:11:33,495 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiServer] (qtp1278852808-495:ctx-1cea20ad 
ctx-5982a2e5) (logid:d7576e47) unhandled exception executing api command: 
[Ljava.lang.String;@44dcd5ae
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Guid is not updated for 
cluster with specified cluster id; need to wait for hosts in this cluster to 
come up
at 
com.cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl.discoverHosts(ResourceManagerImpl.java:640)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native 
Method)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at 
org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:344)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:198)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:163)
at 
org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:97)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:186)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:215)
at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy199.discoverHosts(Unknown Source)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.host.AddHostCmd.execute(AddHostCmd.java:136)
at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:163)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.queueCommand(ApiServer.java:782)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServer.handleRequest(ApiServer.java:603)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequestInContext(ApiServlet.java:347)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet$1.run(ApiServlet.java:154)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:55)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:102)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:52)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.processRequest(ApiServlet.java:151)
at com.cloud.api.ApiServlet.doPost(ApiServlet.java:110)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:665)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:750)
at 
org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder$NotAsync.service(ServletHolder.java:1450)
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.handle(ServletHolder.java:799)
at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.doHandle(ServletHandler.java:554)
at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.handle(ScopedHandler.java:143)
at org.eclipse.jetty.security.SecurityHandler.handle(SecurityHandler.java:600)
at 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerWrapper.handle(HandlerWrapper.java:127)
at 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextHandle(ScopedHandler.java:235)
at 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.session.SessionHandler.doHandle(SessionHandler.java:1624)
at 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ScopedHandler.nextHandle(ScopedHandler.java:233)
at 

Re: Console proxy SSL

2023-11-08 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Jimmy,

The below article might help you, you are using the wildcard certificate right?

https://www.shapeblue.com/securing-cloudstack-4-11-with-https-tls/

-Jithin

From: Jimmy Huybrechts 
Date: Wednesday, 8 November 2023 at 9:52 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Console proxy SSL
Hi,

So I’ve been setting up SSL for the management host and the console proxy but 
on the console proxy it’s not working.

I uploaded the SSL files over the GUI, made the adjustments in the management 
server properties file and restarted it. The management server has a valid ssl 
now.

I changed the console domain to my wildcard address so it generates 
a.b.c.d.(domain) which also works as it’s now reachable, however it still opens 
it in http but then as a.b.c.d.(domain).
The proxy was already destroyed and recreated with the same issue still.

How to debug why it doesn’t work? The management server has full ssl.
--
Jimmy

 



Re: VM Backups

2023-11-06 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Murilo,

There is DELL EMC Networker as well I can find in the documentation:

http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/adminguide/networker_plugin.html#dell-emc-networker-backup-and-recovery-plugin


-Jithin

From: Murilo Moura 
Date: Tuesday, 7 November 2023 at 8:56 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: VM Backups
Hi everyone!

What other solutions, besides Veeam, can be used (in production) to backup
virtual machines integrated with CloudStack?

 



Re: System VM network

2023-11-02 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Jimmy,

Yes, for example:

CPVM needs to connect to hosts to relay the VM console.
SSVM would need connectivity to hosts if you are using VMware ESXi for Volume 
Snapshot operations etc.

-Jithin

From: Jimmy Huybrechts 
Date: Thursday, 2 November 2023 at 2:18 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: System VM network
Hi Jithin,

Do the system vm’s actually need to communicate with the hosts?

--
Jimmy


 



Re: System VM network

2023-11-02 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Jimmy,

Typically subnets with RFC1918 IP addresses are used for management/pod/Private 
networks. The reserved IP address range that you input for a pod will be used 
for System VMs and Virtual Routers by cloud stack. for  We could use IP 
addresses in the same subnet for the hosts.

-Jithin

From: Jimmy Huybrechts 
Date: Thursday, 2 November 2023 at 1:17 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: System VM network
So I guess yes:

In each zone, you need to configure a range of reserved IP addresses for the 
management network. This network carries communication between the CloudStack 
Management Server and various system VMs, such as Secondary Storage VMs, 
Console Proxy VMs, and DHCP.
The reserved IP addresses must be unique across the cloud. You cannot, for 
example, have a host in one zone which has the same private IP address as a 
host in another zone.
The hosts in a pod are assigned private IP addresses. These are typically 
RFC1918 addresses. The Console Proxy and Secondary Storage system VMs are also 
allocated private IP addresses in the CIDR of the pod that they are created in.

So I guess the system reserved IP’s should indeed be the private ones and not 
public IP’s, which would lead to my next question I suppose I cannot give this 
a self-defined VLAN and should be with my management network which is already 
defined on cloudbr0? Should I give the management and KVM host an IP from this 
private subnet as well?

--
Jimmy

Van: Jimmy Huybrechts 
Datum: woensdag, 1 november 2023 om 20:33
Aan: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Onderwerp: System VM network
Hi Team,

I’m trying to built a lab of ACS 4.18 in Ubuntu 22 but I may be looking at the 
network and system vm’s the wrong way.

I have a /27 my management server host has an IP out of and my KVM host has an 
IP out of lets call this range 192.168.10.0/27 (in reality this is a public 
subnet).

Now when creating the zone and pods and such I created a Public range of 
10.0.0.0/24 (or at least an internal range).
When asked for the system reserved addresses I filled out 9 ip’s from my 
management subnet (192.168.10.0/27) under the impression that the console proxy 
etc would get an IP out of that range.

When the System VM’s were built they yes had an IP from that management range 
but then as “Private IP”, the “Public IP” was an IP from 10.0.0.0/24 and of 
course I wasn’t able to use any of them not being reachable from the outside 
since the gateway and IP where the wrong one.

Should I have set my management range as the public range with the ip’s it 
should use? And an internal range as system reserved addresses or what are the 
system reserved addresses for?

--
Jimmy

 



Re: Live Instance Backup

2023-10-30 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Fariborz,

The setting must be : kvm.vmstoragesnapshot.enabled. In case you are looking 
for volume snapshots: kvm.snapshot.enabled .

-Jithin

From: Fariborz Navidan 
Date: Monday, 30 October 2023 at 12:49 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Live Instance Backup
Hello,

Thanks a lot for your reply. Could you please let me know what is the
setting nams in CloudStack?

TIA

On Mon, 30 Oct 2023, 04:37 Simon Weller,  wrote:

> Fariborz,
>
> KVM does support live (running) snapshots, but it's dependent on the
> underlying storage you're using. Currently, only NFS supports live snaps,
> as KVM stores the memory in a QCOW2 image.
>
> There's a global option to enable this feature in CloudStack.
>
> -Si
>
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2023, 6:02 AM Fariborz Navidan 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi CS community,
> >
> > We're running CS 4.15.0.0 and KVM hypervisor. It doesn't support live
> > instance backups. Does the latest version of CS and KVM/QEMU have this
> > feature in place?
> >
> > TIA
> > Cheers.
> >
>

 



Re: AW: Cloudstack VM HA

2023-10-11 Thread Jithin Raju
Sharing this wiki page here, the current implementation might have changed from 
this but still can be used as a reference:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/High+Availability+Developer%27s+Guide


-Jithin

From: Nux 
Date: Wednesday, 11 October 2023 at 8:38 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: Bryan Tiang 
Subject: Re: AW: Cloudstack VM HA
What I learned in practice is that enabling Host HA affects VM HA.. in
that VM HA no longer works. :)

So what does Host HA do? It'll reboot the hypervisor via IPMI if it is
deemed unreachable. While the hypervisor is down or rebooting the VMs
CANNOT be moved/started on another hypervisor.

What does VM HA do? It'll make sure VMs on a HA offering will be
restarted (possibly on another hypervisor) if it is deemed down.
Possible scenarios where VM HA would kick in:
- hypervisor crashed and Cloudstack marked the VMs on it as down
- user has powered off the VM from within (poweroff via ssh for
example), Cloudstack will notice it is down and restart it

As part of VM HA and for data integrity, a hypervisor will keep a
heartbeat file (sort of lock file) on the NFS primary storage - if the
the NFS share has gone away it will assume it is in a network split or
has lost access to the storage and will forcefully reboot itself. This
is where that happens:

https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/d2ad9363a264290e9e5ee58db4a745cbb0e1c62a/scripts/vm/hypervisor/kvm/kvmheartbeat.sh#L162

HTH

On 2023-10-11 14:47, Bryan Tiang wrote:
> Hi Nix and Swen,
>
> Thanks for the input! Just curious, can VM HA and Host HA be enabled at
> the same time?
>
> In our case, using Cloudstack + Linstor.
>
> And to clarify my understanding. Host HA migrates VMs to another Host
> if Cloudstack detects the physical host to be unhealthy, right? That’s
> all?
>
> Regards,
> Bryan
> On 11 Oct 2023 at 7:48 PM +0800, m...@swen.io, wrote:
>> Hi Bryan,
>>
>> we are testing the exact same scenario at the moment! :-)
>>
>> As far as I understand CS has 2 different HA. VM HA and Host HA. When
>> talking about VM HA the VM needs to use an offering with ha is
>> enabled. CS is now checking if the VM is running and if it is not
>> running it will restart or recreate it. You can test this when
>> destroying a vm via virsh destroy on KVM directly. CS will restart
>> this VM.
>>
>> Host HA only works, as NUX wrote, with NFS-storage at the moment. As
>> far as I know StorPool is developing a new framework so other storages
>> can be used for host ha in the future. I read something on the ccc
>> agenda.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Swen
>>
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
>> Von: Bryan Tiang 
>> Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2023 12:36
>> An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Betreff: Cloudstack VM HA
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We are setting up Cloudstack + Linbit SDS (via plugin). Hypervisor is
>> Ubuntu.
>>
>> We are trying to test the VM HA by powering down a physical node at
>> random. However, the VMs doesn’t seem to be failing over to the other
>> nodes.
>>
>> VM HA is enabled already, is there something we are missing?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bryan
>>
>>

 



Re: how to setup a client environment

2023-10-10 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Angelo,

You can create a ‘user’ role for the client possibly in a subdomain. Your 
Isolated guest networks by default won’t be available to other accounts, you 
can restrict the same for Shared, L2 guest networks as well.

Your client will need new guest networks BTW.

-Jithin

From: Angelo Rivera 
Date: Wednesday, 11 October 2023 at 5:49 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: how to setup a client environment
Hi,

I am new to cloudstack, is it possible to have a client environment
where as network that I have created for my account and user are not
viewable from possible client that I want to use my cloudstack system?


is so how to set that UP?

regards,
Angelo

 



Re: Management server not connected from SSVM

2023-10-03 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Jaejong,

I doubt we can share any files attached over this mailing list, you could 
create a github issue?

-Jithin

From: jaejong 
Date: Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 5:39 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Management server not connected from SSVM
Hi Jithin Raju
I wonder it is right way to present log state as attached file.

I do'nt understand you said "I am assuming you are not using a hostname?"
For the port connectivity, see ip-listen-state file.


I send log files.

during installation configuration, I set stroage traffic ips as from 10.0.33.1 
to 10.0.33.10
I  only add nfs server of 10.0.33.1 as secondary storage. but I see at 
cloud.log as follows;
Mon 02 Oct 2023 01:11:30 PM UTC Successfully setup storage network with 
STORAGE_IP:10.0.33.2, STORAGE_NETMASK:255.255.240.0, STORAGE_CIDR

except it, I can find any problems.

I hope you can help me.

Thanks a lot.


 


-Original Message-
From: "jaejong"
To: ;
Cc:
Sent: 2023-10-03 (화) 16:40:12 (GMT+09:00)
Subject: Re: Management server not connected from SSVM
I will reboot for clean log.
I will report server and host settig all.
Can i upload log and settings as file attached?

I need help for this. I will be back.


-Original Message-
From: "Jithin Raju"
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org";
Cc:
Sent: 2023-10-03 (화) 16:28:26 (GMT+09:00)
Subject: Re: Management server not connected from SSVM

Hi Jeojong,

Since you mentioned the management server IP is reachable from the SSVM I am 
not sure why this error should appear, can you check the port connectivity? I 
am assuming you are not using a hostname?

-Jithin

From: jaejong 
Date: Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 11:58 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Management server not connected from SSVM
Hi  Jithin Raju
error messages from cloud.log:

2023-10-03 04:17:26,867 INFO  [utils.nio.NioClient] (main:null) Connecting to 
serverIP:8250
2023-10-03 04:17:29,935 ERROR [utils.nio.NioConnection] (main:null) Unable to 
initialize the threads.
java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host
  at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect0(Native Method)
  at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:483)
  at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:472)
  at 
java.base/sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.connect(SocketChannelImpl.java:692)
  at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioClient.init(NioClient.java:56)
  at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioConnection.start(NioConnection.java:95)
  at com.cloud.agent.Agent.start(Agent.java:283)
  at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchNewAgent(AgentShell.java:454)
  at 
com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgentFromClassInfo(AgentShell.java:431)
  at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgent(AgentShell.java:415)
  at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.start(AgentShell.java:511)
  at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.main(AgentShell.java:541)
2023-10-03 04:17:29,939 WARN  [cloud.agent.Agent] (main:null) NIO Connection 
Exception  com.cloud.utils.exception.NioConnectionException: No route to host
...
2023-10-03 04:17:37,999 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (main:null) Attempted to 
connect to the server, but received an unexpected exception, trying again...
com.cloud.utils.exception.NioConnectionException: No route to host
  at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioConnection.start(NioConnection.java:101)
  at com.cloud.agent.Agent.start(Agent.java:294)
  at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchNewAgent(AgentShell.java:454)
  at 
com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgentFromClassInfo(AgentShell.java:431)
  at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgent(AgentShell.java:415)
  at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.start(AgentShell.java:511)
  at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.main(AgentShell.java:541)
Caused by: java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host
  at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect0(Native Method)
  at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:483)
  at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:472)
  at 
java.base/sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.connect(SocketChannelImpl.java:692)
  at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioClient.init(NioClient.java:56)
  at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioConnection.start(NioConnection.java:95)
  ... 6 more
.
2023-10-03 04:17:44,187 INFO  [storage.template.DownloadManagerImpl] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) found 3 
templates[/mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7/template/tmpl/1/3/db2b01f1-5a4f-44b5-a0e7-bd2dac5c3b6e.qcow2,
 /mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7/template/tmpl/1/4/, 
/mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7/template/tmpl/1/202/]
2023-10-03 04:17:44,195 WARN  [storage.template.DownloadManagerImpl] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Post download installation was not completed for 
/mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7/template/tmpl/1/4
2023-10-03 04:17:44,197 WARN  [storage.template.DownloadManagerImpl] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Post download installation was not completed for 
/mnt/SecStorage/7d99d

Re: Creation of VM in XCP-NG 8.2

2023-10-03 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Marty,

I can try the same and let you know if I could find anything useful.

-Jithin

From: ma...@gonsource.com 
Date: Wednesday, 4 October 2023 at 2:31 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: RE: Creation of VM in XCP-NG 8.2
I don't care to answer at all.

What is the guest OS?

- - - - - - Windows Server 2022

Are the test XCP and the XCP hosts managed by CS on the same version?

- - - - - - - Yes, they are. 8.2.1. The CS managed needs patches but they
are the same version.

Is the template information as per XAPI DB ( using xe commands) for the
standalone and the CS managed VMs different?

- - - - - - - As far as I could tell no. I exported the VDI straight from
the XCP test cluster and imported it as a VDI directly into Cloudstack.

What is the CS version in use?

- - - - - - - I am on 4.18.1



 


-Original Message-
From: Jithin Raju 
Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2023 1:14 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Creation of VM in XCP-NG 8.2

Hi Marty,

I have a few questions to understand your scenario better. I hope you don't
mind answering.

What is the guest OS?
Are the test XCP and the XCP hosts managed by CS on the same version?
Is the template information as per XAPI DB ( using xe commands) for the
standalone and the CS managed VMs different?
What is the CS version in use?

-Jithin

From: ma...@gonsource.com 
Date: Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 12:29 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Creation of VM in XCP-NG 8.2
Hello all,



I have a template I imported with the Citrix Management Agent installed from
Xenserver.com.  On my "test" XCP cluster (not connected to CS), the agent
says it is there and the VM shows the Xenserver NIC, for example. When I
export the disk and import it into CS, the agent does not show it is
installed and the NIC is the Realtek NIC. Is there anything "special" that
is being changed when CS deploys the template in a cluster with XCP-NG that
would cause this?



Thank you for the help.





Re: Management server not connected from SSVM

2023-10-03 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Jeojong,

Since you mentioned the management server IP is reachable from the SSVM I am 
not sure why this error should appear, can you check the port connectivity? I 
am assuming you are not using a hostname?

-Jithin

From: jaejong 
Date: Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 11:58 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Management server not connected from SSVM
Hi  Jithin Raju
error messages from cloud.log:

2023-10-03 04:17:26,867 INFO  [utils.nio.NioClient] (main:null) Connecting to 
serverIP:8250
2023-10-03 04:17:29,935 ERROR [utils.nio.NioConnection] (main:null) Unable to 
initialize the threads.
java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect0(Native Method)
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:483)
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:472)
at 
java.base/sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.connect(SocketChannelImpl.java:692)
at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioClient.init(NioClient.java:56)
at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioConnection.start(NioConnection.java:95)
at com.cloud.agent.Agent.start(Agent.java:283)
at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchNewAgent(AgentShell.java:454)
at 
com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgentFromClassInfo(AgentShell.java:431)
at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgent(AgentShell.java:415)
at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.start(AgentShell.java:511)
at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.main(AgentShell.java:541)
2023-10-03 04:17:29,939 WARN  [cloud.agent.Agent] (main:null) NIO Connection 
Exception  com.cloud.utils.exception.NioConnectionException: No route to host
...
2023-10-03 04:17:37,999 INFO  [cloud.agent.Agent] (main:null) Attempted to 
connect to the server, but received an unexpected exception, trying again...
com.cloud.utils.exception.NioConnectionException: No route to host
at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioConnection.start(NioConnection.java:101)
at com.cloud.agent.Agent.start(Agent.java:294)
at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchNewAgent(AgentShell.java:454)
at 
com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgentFromClassInfo(AgentShell.java:431)
at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.launchAgent(AgentShell.java:415)
at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.start(AgentShell.java:511)
at com.cloud.agent.AgentShell.main(AgentShell.java:541)
Caused by: java.net.NoRouteToHostException: No route to host
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect0(Native Method)
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:483)
at java.base/sun.nio.ch.Net.connect(Net.java:472)
at 
java.base/sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.connect(SocketChannelImpl.java:692)
at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioClient.init(NioClient.java:56)
at com.cloud.utils.nio.NioConnection.start(NioConnection.java:95)
... 6 more
.
2023-10-03 04:17:44,187 INFO  [storage.template.DownloadManagerImpl] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) found 3 
templates[/mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7/template/tmpl/1/3/db2b01f1-5a4f-44b5-a0e7-bd2dac5c3b6e.qcow2,
 /mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7/template/tmpl/1/4/, 
/mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7/template/tmpl/1/202/]
2023-10-03 04:17:44,195 WARN  [storage.template.DownloadManagerImpl] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Post download installation was not completed for 
/mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7/template/tmpl/1/4
2023-10-03 04:17:44,197 WARN  [storage.template.DownloadManagerImpl] 
(agentRequest-Handler-2:null) Post download installation was not completed for 
/mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7/template/tmpl/1/202
.
2023-10-03 04:17:49,170 INFO  [storage.template.DownloadManagerImpl] 
(pool-1-thread-2:null) Download Completion for jobId: 
5b5d49d2-284f-4300-a428-1e9f38a7a8c6, status=UNRECOVERABLE_ERROR
2023-10-03 04:17:49,171 INFO  [storage.template.DownloadManagerImpl] 
(pool-1-thread-1:null) Download Completion for jobId: 
6f7be7ed-259e-4ca3-b803-326ad779ae3b, status=UNRECOVERABLE_ERROR
2023-10-03 04:17:49,176 INFO  [storage.template.DownloadManagerImpl] 
(pool-1-thread-1:null) local: 
/mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7/template/tmpl/1/4/dnld4779556823249392615tmp_,
 bytes=(0 bytes) 0, error=No route to host (Host unreachable), pct=0
2023-10-03 04:17:49,177 INFO  [storage.template.DownloadManagerImpl] 
(pool-1-thread-2:null) local: 
/mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7/template/tmpl/1/202/dnld1894069453551272666tmp_,
 bytes=(0 bytes) 0, error=No route to host (Host unreachable), pct=0

thanks!!

 


-Original Message-
From: "Jithin Raju"
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org";
Cc:
Sent: 2023-10-03 (화) 15:03:39 (GMT+09:00)
Subject: Re: Management server not connected from SSVM

Hi Jaejong,

If the SSVM can connect the management server the SSVM agent should get 
connected, any errors you can see in the cloud.log in SSVM?

-Jithin

From: jaejong 
Date: Tuesday, 3 O

Re: Management server not connected from SSVM

2023-10-03 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Jaejong,

If the SSVM can connect the management server the SSVM agent should get 
connected, any errors you can see in the cloud.log in SSVM?

-Jithin

From: jaejong 
Date: Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 11:28 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Management server not connected from SSVM
Thank tou Jithin!

The management server IP is currect.
I can ping to management server from SSVM, but can not to public IP of system 
VMs from management server.
There is no route on the SSVM.

Thanks again!!

 


-Original Message-
From: "Jithin Raju"
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org";
Cc:
Sent: 2023-10-03 (화) 14:04:53 (GMT+09:00)
Subject: Re: Management server not connected from SSVM

Hi Jaejong,

Could you verify whether the management server IP is correct in the global 
configuration parameter ‘host’?
Is there a route on the SSVM to route the management server IP via eth1?
Can you ping the management server IP from SSVM?

-Jithin

From: jaejong 
Date: Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 9:35 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Management server not connected from SSVM
I try tried install acs on rocky9.2, but I can't config network by nmcli for 
acs manuals.

I have experience acs 4.17.2 on rocky 8.7 successsfully.
So I try install acs 4.18.1 on rocky8.8.

But I can ping system VMs.
public ip status for system VMs are :
* ip is allocated status.
* stactic and source NAT is disabled.
* virtual route is not exist.

At management server,  netstat -tulpn | grep LISTEN report
8080,8250,9090 port are listening, But 8443 not.

I checked SSVM by sh ssvm-check.sh;

First DNS server is  8.8.8.8
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=115 time=27.206 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=115 time=26.872 ms
--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 26.872/27.039/27.206/0.167 ms
Good: Can ping DNS server

Good: DNS resolves cloudstack.apache.org

nfs is currently mounted
Mount point is /mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7
Good: Can write to mount point

Management server is 10.0.*. Checking connectivity.
ssvm-check.sh: 143: Syntax error: redirection unexpected

I want to add kubernetes ISO.

How can i fix this?

Thanks.





Re: Creation of VM in XCP-NG 8.2

2023-10-02 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Marty,

I have a few questions to understand your scenario better. I hope you don’t 
mind answering.

What is the guest OS?
Are the test XCP and the XCP hosts managed by CS on the same version?
Is the template information as per XAPI DB ( using xe commands) for the 
standalone and the CS managed VMs different?
What is the CS version in use?

-Jithin

From: ma...@gonsource.com 
Date: Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 12:29 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Creation of VM in XCP-NG 8.2
Hello all,



I have a template I imported with the Citrix Management Agent installed from
Xenserver.com.  On my "test" XCP cluster (not connected to CS), the agent
says it is there and the VM shows the Xenserver NIC, for example. When I
export the disk and import it into CS, the agent does not show it is
installed and the NIC is the Realtek NIC. Is there anything "special" that
is being changed when CS deploys the template in a cluster with XCP-NG that
would cause this?



Thank you for the help.

 



Re: Management server not connected from SSVM

2023-10-02 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Jaejong,

Could you verify whether the management server IP is correct in the global 
configuration parameter ‘host’?
Is there a route on the SSVM to route the management server IP via eth1?
Can you ping the management server IP from SSVM?

-Jithin

From: jaejong 
Date: Tuesday, 3 October 2023 at 9:35 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Management server not connected from SSVM
I try tried install acs on rocky9.2, but I can't config network by nmcli for 
acs manuals.

I have experience acs 4.17.2 on rocky 8.7 successsfully.
So I try install acs 4.18.1 on rocky8.8.

But I can ping system VMs.
public ip status for system VMs are :
* ip is allocated status.
* stactic and source NAT is disabled.
* virtual route is not exist.

At management server,  netstat -tulpn | grep LISTEN report
8080,8250,9090 port are listening, But 8443 not.

I checked SSVM by sh ssvm-check.sh;

First DNS server is  8.8.8.8
PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=0 ttl=115 time=27.206 ms
64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=115 time=26.872 ms
--- 8.8.8.8 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 26.872/27.039/27.206/0.167 ms
Good: Can ping DNS server

Good: DNS resolves cloudstack.apache.org

nfs is currently mounted
Mount point is /mnt/SecStorage/7d99d8d2-539f-3850-8a7c-7ec93eec7ea7
Good: Can write to mount point

Management server is 10.0.*. Checking connectivity.
ssvm-check.sh: 143: Syntax error: redirection unexpected

I want to add kubernetes ISO.

How can i fix this?

Thanks.

 



Re: Delete primary storage via UI

2023-09-29 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Swen,


  1.  Delete all the volumes in the primary storage.
  2.  Enable maintenance mode
  3.  Delete the primary storage.

-Jithin

From: m...@swen.io 
Date: Friday, 29 September 2023 at 5:14 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Delete primary storage via UI
Hi all,



just a quick question. Should I be able to delete a primary storage va UI as
admin? As far as I see there is no icon to do that.



Regards,

Swen

 



Re: Network Offering for L2 Interface

2023-09-22 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Levin,

I realized later it won't work that easily with Cloudstack yet.

-Jithin

From: Levin Ng 
Date: Friday, 22 September 2023 at 4:35 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org , 
users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Network Offering for L2 Interface
Hi Jithin,

Can you elaborate more of your approach, having all vlan under base kvm, but 
ACS still just assign one VLAN on guest VM, whatever VLAN it tag inside VM, it 
is q-in-q configuration.

Regards,
Levin
On 22 Sep 2023 at 07:38 +0100, Jithin Raju , wrote:
> Hi Levin,
>
> You could try this on the base KVM :
>
> bridge vlan add vid 2-4094 dev eth1
>
> -Jithin
>
> From: Levin Ng 
> Date: Friday, 22 September 2023 at 4:27 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Subject: Network Offering for L2 Interface
> Hi,
>
> I’m looking for a better solution for assign a root bridge interface without 
> assigning VLAN for VM, allow me to test nested virtulization environment such 
> as ACS in ACS, where requires VLAN tagging in side the nested KVM. I’d been 
> worked out two way to achieve it,
>
> • SR-IOV with pass-through PCI
> • q-in-q network setup
>
> but it require quite much admin work before hand, appreciated if everyone 
> have ideas to done it in more elegant way.
>
>
> Regards,
> Levin
>
>
>

 



Re: Network Offering for L2 Interface

2023-09-22 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Levin,

You could try this on the base KVM :

bridge vlan add vid 2-4094 dev eth1

-Jithin

From: Levin Ng 
Date: Friday, 22 September 2023 at 4:27 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Network Offering for L2 Interface
Hi,

I’m looking for a better solution for assign a root bridge interface without 
assigning VLAN for VM, allow me to test nested virtulization environment such 
as ACS in ACS, where requires VLAN tagging in side the nested KVM.  I’d been 
worked out two way to achieve it,

• SR-IOV with pass-through PCI
• q-in-q network setup

but it require quite much admin work before hand, appreciated if everyone have 
ideas to done it in more elegant way.


Regards,
Levin

 



Re: Detected that another management node with the same IP is already running, please check your cluster configuration

2023-09-19 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Jaejong,

Are you able to start clouddtack service without any errors? If not check the 
service using port 9090 and disable/stop it.

systemctl list-sockets


-Jithin

From: jaejong 
Date: Wednesday, 20 September 2023 at 10:06 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Detected that another management node with the same IP is already 
running, please check your cluster configuration
hellow Jithin

I reboot host with  cloudstack-management enabled

port status are :
$ sudo netstat -nap | grep 8080

tcp6   0  0 :::8080 :::*LISTEN
1147/java

tcp6   0  0 :::9090 :::*LISTEN  
1/systemd
tcp6   0  0 10.0.33.1:9090  10.0.33.1:47813 TIME_WAIT   
-
tcp6   0  0 10.0.33.1:9090  10.0.33.1:42097 TIME_WAIT   
-
tcp6   0  0 10.0.33.1:9090  10.0.33.1:44439 TIME_WAIT   
-
tcp6   0  0 10.0.33.1:9090  10.0.33.1:52903 TIME_WAIT   
-
tcp6   0  0 10.0.33.1:9090  10.0.33.1:33893 TIME_WAIT   
-
tcp6   0  0 10.0.33.1:9090  10.0.33.1:45235 TIME_WAIT   
-
tcp6   0  0 10.0.33.1:9090  10.0.33.1:60319 TIME_WAIT   
-
tcp6   0  0 10.0.33.1:9090  10.0.33.1:49279 TIME_WAIT   
-

tcp6   0  0 :::8250 :::*LISTEN
1147/java

But after rebooting with  cloudstack-management disabled
only 9090 is used.

$ sudo netstat -nap | grep 9090
tcp6 0  0 :::9090  :::*   LISTEN 1/systemd

thanks a lot.




 


-Original Message-
From: "Jithin Raju"
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org";
Cc:
Sent: 2023-09-20 (수) 12:46:36 (GMT+09:00)
Subject: Re: Detected that another management node with the same IP is already 
running, please check your cluster configuration

Hi Jaejong,

Could you check whether any of the port numbers 8250,9090,8080 TCP are in use 
already? Or reboot the OS?

-Jithin

From: jaejong 
Date: Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 4:20 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Detected that another management node with the same IP is already 
running, please check your cluster configuration
rocky linux 9.2
mysql 8.0.32
A single Management Server node with mysql on the same node

1. After rebooting management host I get follow error messages

sudo systemctl status cloudstack-management

Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/cloudstack-management.service; 
enabled; preset: disabled)
Active: active (running) since Tue 2023-09-19 17:35:39 KST; 2min 3s ago
  Main PID: 1148 (java)
 Tasks: 49 (limit: 408699)
Memory: 1.1G
   CPU: 40.653s
CGroup: /system.slice/cloudstack-management.service
└─1148 /usr/bin/java 
-Djava.security.properties=/etc/cloudstack/management/java.security.ciphers 
-Djava.awt.headless=true -Dcom.sun.management.>

java[1148]: at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:73)
java[1148]: at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.start(ContainerLifeCycle.java:169)
java[1148]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.start(Server.java:423)
java[1148]: at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.doStart(ContainerLifeCycle.java:110)
java[1148]: at 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.AbstractHandler.doStart(AbstractHandler.java:97)
java[1148]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:387)
java[1148]: at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:73)
java[1148]: at 
org.apache.cloudstack.ServerDaemon.start(ServerDaemon.java:192)
java[1148]: at 
org.apache.cloudstack.ServerDaemon.main(ServerDaemon.java:107)
java[1148]: INFO  [o.a.c.s.NfsMountManager] (main:null) (logid:) Clean up 
mounted NFS mount points used in current session

server.log
2023-09-19 17:35:54,352 ERROR [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null) (logid:) 
Detected that another management node with the same IP 10.0.33.1 is already 
running, please check your cluster configuration
2023-09-19 17:35:54,353 ERROR [o.a.c.s.l.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle] 
(main:null) (logid:) Failed to configure ClusterManagerImpl
javax.naming.ConfigurationException: Detected that another management node with 
the same IP  is already running, please check your cluster configuration
   at 
com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.checkConflicts(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1245)
   at 
com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.configure(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1115)
   at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle$3.with(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:114)
   at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.with(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:153)
   at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.configure(CloudStackExt

Re: Detected that another management node with the same IP is already running, please check your cluster configuration

2023-09-19 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Jaejong,

Could you check whether any of the port numbers 8250,9090,8080 TCP are in use 
already? Or reboot the OS?

-Jithin

From: jaejong 
Date: Tuesday, 19 September 2023 at 4:20 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Detected that another management node with the same IP is already 
running, please check your cluster configuration
rocky linux 9.2
mysql 8.0.32
A single Management Server node with mysql on the same node

1. After rebooting management host I get follow error messages

sudo systemctl status cloudstack-management

 Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/cloudstack-management.service; 
enabled; preset: disabled)
 Active: active (running) since Tue 2023-09-19 17:35:39 KST; 2min 3s ago
   Main PID: 1148 (java)
  Tasks: 49 (limit: 408699)
 Memory: 1.1G
CPU: 40.653s
 CGroup: /system.slice/cloudstack-management.service
 └─1148 /usr/bin/java 
-Djava.security.properties=/etc/cloudstack/management/java.security.ciphers 
-Djava.awt.headless=true -Dcom.sun.management.>

java[1148]: at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:73)
java[1148]: at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.start(ContainerLifeCycle.java:169)
java[1148]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.start(Server.java:423)
java[1148]: at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.doStart(ContainerLifeCycle.java:110)
java[1148]: at 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.AbstractHandler.doStart(AbstractHandler.java:97)
java[1148]: at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:387)
java[1148]: at 
org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLifeCycle.java:73)
java[1148]: at 
org.apache.cloudstack.ServerDaemon.start(ServerDaemon.java:192)
java[1148]: at 
org.apache.cloudstack.ServerDaemon.main(ServerDaemon.java:107)
java[1148]: INFO  [o.a.c.s.NfsMountManager] (main:null) (logid:) Clean up 
mounted NFS mount points used in current session

server.log
2023-09-19 17:35:54,352 ERROR [c.c.c.ClusterManagerImpl] (main:null) (logid:) 
Detected that another management node with the same IP 10.0.33.1 is already 
running, please check your cluster configuration
2023-09-19 17:35:54,353 ERROR [o.a.c.s.l.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle] 
(main:null) (logid:) Failed to configure ClusterManagerImpl
javax.naming.ConfigurationException: Detected that another management node with 
the same IP  is already running, please check your cluster configuration
at 
com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.checkConflicts(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1245)
at 
com.cloud.cluster.ClusterManagerImpl.configure(ClusterManagerImpl.java:1115)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle$3.with(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:114)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.with(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:153)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.configure(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:110)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.lifecycle.CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.start(CloudStackExtendedLifeCycle.java:55)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.doStart(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:178)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.access$200(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:54)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor$LifecycleGroup.start(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:356)
at java.base/java.lang.Iterable.forEach(Iterable.java:75)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.startBeans(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:155)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.DefaultLifecycleProcessor.onRefresh(DefaultLifecycleProcessor.java:123)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.finishRefresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:937)
at 
org.springframework.context.support.AbstractApplicationContext.refresh(AbstractApplicationContext.java:586)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.loadContext(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:144)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet$2.with(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:121)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:244)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:249)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:249)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.spring.module.model.impl.DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.withModule(DefaultModuleDefinitionSet.java:232)
at 

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache CloudStack LTS Maintenance Release 4.18.1.0

2023-09-18 Thread Jithin Raju
Congratulations everyone on the new release. Thanks Wei.

-Jithin

From: Wei ZHOU 
Date: Friday, 15 September 2023 at 7:15 PM
To: users 
Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache CloudStack LTS Maintenance Release 4.18.1.0
The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the release of
CloudStack 4.18.1.0.

The CloudStack 4.18.1.0 release is a maintenance release as part of
its 4.18.x LTS branch and contains around 200 fixes and
improvements since the CloudStack 4.18.0.0 release. Some of the
highlights include:

- Support Managed User Data in AutoScale VM groups
- Support CKS (CloudStack Kubernetes Cluster) in VPC tiers
- Support for VMware 8.0.0.x
- Several Hypervisor (VMware, KVM, XenServer) fixes and improvements
- Several UI fixes and improvements
- Several Network (L2, VXLAN, etc) fixes and improvements
- Several System VM (CPVM, SSVM) fixes and improvements
- Improve Solidfire storage plugin integration on VMware
- Support volume migration in ScaleIO/PowerFlex within and across
ScaleIO/PowerFlex storage clusters
- Volume encryption support for StorPool
- Fix CloudStack upgrade with some MySQL versions
- Fix guest OSes and guest OS mappings in CloudStack database


CloudStack LTS branches are supported for 18 months and will receive
updates for the first 12 months and only security updates in the last
6 months.

Apache CloudStack is an integrated Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
software platform that allows users to build feature-rich public and
private cloud environments. CloudStack includes an intuitive user
interface and rich API for managing the compute, networking, software,
and storage resources. The project became an Apache top-level project
in March, 2013.

More information about Apache CloudStack can be found at:
https://cloudstack.apache.org/

# Documentation

What's new in CloudStack 4.18.1.0:
https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.18.1.0/releasenotes/about.html

The 4.18.1.0 release notes include a full list of issues fixed, as
well as upgrade instructions from previous versions of Apache
CloudStack, and can be found at:
https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.18.1.0/releasenotes/

The official installation, administration, and API documentation for
each of the releases are available on our documentation page:
https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/

# Downloads

The official source code for the 4.18.1.0 release can be downloaded
from our downloads page:
https://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html

In addition to the official source code release, individual
contributors have also made convenience binaries available on the
Apache CloudStack download page, and can be found at:

https://download.cloudstack.org/el/7/
https://download.cloudstack.org/el/8/
https://download.cloudstack.org/ubuntu/dists/
https://www.shapeblue.com/packages/

 



Re: creating multiple VM's from template

2023-09-14 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Gary,

Could you check whether setting ‘execute.in.sequence.hypervisor.commands’ to 
‘false’ helps if it not already done? The default is ‘false’.

You might want to review the logs to identify which operation is taking more 
time.

-Jithin

From: Cristian Ciobanu 
Date: Thursday, 14 September 2023 at 10:18 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: creating multiple VM's from template
Hi Gary,

   Are you sure that is not related to your storage performance? In my
case, Windows takes much longer to deploy than Linux, because of the
template size even with SSD/Nvme performance.

Cristian

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023, 19:38 Gary Dixon 
wrote:

> Hi all
>
>
>
> ACS 4.15.2
>
> KVM hypervisor on Ubuntu 20.04
>
>
>
> We use Ansible to create 50 Windows VM’s from a template to spin up a
> large Citrix estate. It currently takes around 2 hours for the entire
> process to complete.
>
> Are there any settings in ACS that we can tweak to speed up the process ?
>
>
>
> BR
>
>
>
> Gary
> Gary Dixon​
> Senior Technical Consultant
> T:  +44 161 537 4990
> E:  v <+44%207989717661>ms@quadris‑support.com
> W: www.quadris.co.uk
> The information contained in this e-mail from Quadris may be confidential
> and privileged for the private use of the named recipient.  The contents of
> this e-mail may not necessarily represent the official views of Quadris.
> If you have received this information in error you must not copy,
> distribute or take any action or reliance on its contents.  Please destroy
> any hard copies and delete this message.
>

 



Re: Can I use KVM local storage for user vm

2023-09-06 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi,

To control the volume placement to storage you can use storage tags.

-Jithin

From: Wei ZHOU 
Date: Wednesday, 6 September 2023 at 1:53 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Can I use KVM local storage for user vm
Hi,

You can add kvm hosts with multiple local storages.
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/333/files

Each storage will be added as a storage pool.
You can deploy vms, migrate vms/volumes between pools.

-Wei

On Wed, 6 Sept 2023 at 09:52, Technology Mail 
wrote:

> *Hi,*
>
> My setup is AlmaLinux8, all are working fine using mgmt+nfs, but I have
> 8 NVME disk (every disk size 1.8TB) mount on kvm server, so I want to
> use all disk as user vm storage disk separately.
>
> *My idea is :* When setup zone then using enable local storage. But this
> settings is only for one disk or all kvm server disk.
>
> But I have 8 disk, so how to trace mgmt server my all 8 disk separately.
> For example, I want 5 user vm for disk 1, another 5 user vm use disk 2,
> as like another user vm disk 3...etc.
>
> which process can I use this disk? give me some idea please ...
>
> --
>
> *Thanks & Regards.*
>
> *Support Admin*
>
> 
>
> *Facebook  | Twitter
>  | YouTube
>  | LinkedIn
> *
>
> *Address : *116/1 West Malibagh, D. I. T Road
>
> Dhaka-1217, Bangladesh
>
> *Mob :* +88 01716915504
>
> *Email :* support.ad...@technologyrss.com
>
> *Web :* www.technologyrss.com
>

 



Re: Restricting instance deletion to the creator.

2023-09-04 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Jorge,

I think this is not possible currently, you could open an enhancement request?

-Jithin

From: Jorge Luiz Correa 
Date: Friday, 1 September 2023 at 4:39 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Restricting instance deletion to the creator.
Is there any way (global configuration, role changes, etc.) to restrict
deletion of an instance to the creator only?

For example, I have a Project with a few users. If user A creates an
instance, only user A can delete it. The goal is that one user can't delete
instances from another by mistake.

Thanks!
:)

--
Jorge Luiz Corrêa
Embrapa Agricultura Digital

echo "CkpvcmdlIEx1aXogQ29ycmVhCkFu
YWxpc3RhIGRlIFJlZGVzIGUgU2VndXJhbm
NhCkVtYnJhcGEgQWdyaWN1bHR1cmEgRGln
aXRhbCAtIE5USQpBdi4gQW5kcmUgVG9zZW
xsbywgMjA5IChCYXJhbyBHZXJhbGRvKQpD
RVAgMTMwODMtODg2IC0gQ2FtcGluYXMsIF
NQClRlbGVmb25lOiAoMTkpIDMyMTEtNTg4
Mgpqb3JnZS5sLmNvcnJlYUBlbWJyYXBhLm
JyCgo="|base64 -d

--
__
Aviso de confidencialidade

Esta mensagem da
Empresa  Brasileira de Pesquisa  Agropecuaria (Embrapa), empresa publica
federal  regida pelo disposto  na Lei Federal no. 5.851,  de 7 de dezembro
de 1972,  e  enviada exclusivamente  a seu destinatario e pode conter
informacoes  confidenciais, protegidas  por sigilo profissional.  Sua
utilizacao desautorizada  e ilegal e  sujeita o infrator as penas da lei.
Se voce  a recebeu indevidamente, queira, por gentileza, reenvia-la ao
emitente, esclarecendo o equivoco.

Confidentiality note

This message from
Empresa  Brasileira de Pesquisa  Agropecuaria (Embrapa), a government
company  established under  Brazilian law (5.851/72), is directed
exclusively to  its addressee  and may contain confidential data,
protected under  professional secrecy  rules. Its unauthorized  use is
illegal and  may subject the transgressor to the law's penalties. If you
are not the addressee, please send it back, elucidating the failure.

 



Re: Restriction for a VPC LoadBalancer Rule supporting TCP and UDP

2023-09-04 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Ricardo,

UDP is restricted currently since HAproxy won’t support it. This is based on 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4501

You may review and report an issue/improvement in Git Hub.

-Jithin

From: Kuasar 
Date: Friday, 25 August 2023 at 5:05 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Restriction for a VPC LoadBalancer Rule supporting TCP and UDP
Hi ACS Community,

I was trying to setup and udp load balancer rule to support both tcp and udp 
using the same public ip but I’m receiving an error “LB service provider cannot 
support this rule”, is there any restriction on that?

ACS: 4.18.0
Hyp: KVM
VPC


Thanks,

Ricardo Pertuz


 



Re: KVM Host Integration - Network Interfaces

2023-08-22 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Wilken,

For each hypervisor type, you can set a traffic label per traffic type in each 
zone. You should be able to find that under zone-> Physical networks.

-Jithin

From: W. Verleger - proIO GmbH 
Date: Tuesday, 22 August 2023 at 6:41 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: KVM Host Integration - Network Interfaces
Hi all,

We are running ACS 4.18.0.0 with one XCP-ng Host integrated in one Zone already.
As physical network we defined "Mgmt" (Management) and "Frontnet" (Guest, 
Public).

Now we want to add a new KVM host to the same Zone but a different cluster.
Therefor we defined on the KVM host two new Bonds and on top of them two 
Bridges.

While trying to add the new host we received a timeout: Error 530 Unable to add 
the host: Cannot find the server resources at http://IP

And the following cloudstack-agent error message on the KVM host:

DEBUG:root:cloudbr0 is not a network device, is it down?

Is it mandatory to name the Bridges exactly "cloudbr0", "cloudbr1, ... ?
If so, how to add a KVM host to an existing Zone with different Interface names 
(Mgmt / Frontnet)?

Thank you!

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / With kind regards

Wilken Verleger


proIO GmbH
Kleyerstr. 79 - 89 / Tor 13
D-60326 Frankfurt am Main

- Support -
Mail: supp...@proio.com
24h:  +(49) (0) 1805 522 855

- proIO GmbH -
Geschäftsführer: Swen Brüseke
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Frankfurt am Main

USt-IdNr. DE 267 075 918
Registergericht: Frankfurt am Main - HRB 86239

Diese E-Mail enthält vertrauliche und/oder rechtlich geschützte Informationen.
Wenn Sie nicht der richtige Adressat sind oder diese E-Mail irrtümlich erhalten 
haben,
informieren Sie bitte sofort den Absender und vernichten Sie diese Mail.
Das unerlaubte Kopieren sowie die unbefugte Weitergabe dieser Mail sind nicht 
gestattet.

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) 
please notify
the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail.
Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this 
e-mail is strictly forbidden.

 



Re: Database High Availablity With Automatic failover

2023-08-22 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Joan,

That feature is known to have some issues. You may file an issue in GitHub.

-Jithin

From: Joan g 
Date: Monday, 21 August 2023 at 10:08 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Database High Availablity With Automatic failover
Hi,
Community, I would like to know if it is possible to enable Database High
Availability With Automatic failover in cloudstack 4.18.

In my Lab, I have setup Mysql With master master replication, cloudstack
db.properties are changed from default as
===
db.ha.enabled=true
db.cloud.replicas=192.168.10.3
=

On DB Master fail, Cloudstack is not switching to slave on the above IP.

Can someone guide what I am missing here.

Regards,
Jon

 



Re: CloudStack 14.18.0 Can't mount cpvm secondary storage

2023-07-27 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Mindaugas,

CPVM doesn’t require access to secondary storage. You can avoid running the 
script ‘ssvm-check.sh’ on CPVM.

-Jithin

From: Mindaugas Milinavičius 
Date: Friday, 28 July 2023 at 12:27 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: CloudStack 14.18.0 Can't mount cpvm secondary storage
Hello everyone,

with ssvm - without any problem, all working good, with cpvm - can't mount
nfs secondary storage.

I tried mount manually - without problem. ping going.

Anyone have this problem?



root@s-8-VM:/usr/local/cloud/systemvm# ./ssvm-check.sh

First DNS server is  1.1.1.1
PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=60 time=0.933 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=1.004 ms
--- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.933/0.969/1.004/0.036 ms
Good: Can ping DNS server

Good: DNS resolves cloudstack.apache.org

nfs is currently mounted
Mount point is /mnt/SecStorage/a8305a6a-a24a-3d7b-875a-584b6157a348
Good: Can write to mount point

Management server is 185.*,10.0.11.31. Checking connectivity.
Good: Can connect to management server 185.* port 8250
Good: Can connect to management server 10.0.11.31 port 8250

Good: Java process is running

Tests Complete. Look for ERROR or WARNING above.
root@s-8-VM:/usr/local/cloud/systemvm#





root@v-10-VM:/usr/local/cloud/systemvm# ./ssvm-check.sh

First DNS server is  1.1.1.1
PING 1.1.1.1 (1.1.1.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=60 time=1.063 ms
64 bytes from 1.1.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=0.936 ms
--- 1.1.1.1 ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.936/1.000/1.063/0.064 ms
Good: Can ping DNS server

Good: DNS resolves cloudstack.apache.org

ERROR: Storage nfs is not currently mounted
Verifying if we can at least ping the storage
Storage address is empty, trying to ping storage network gateway instead ()
ping: missing host operand
Try 'ping --help' or 'ping --usage' for more information.
WARNING: Cannot ping nfs storage network gateway
routing table follows
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
0.0.0.0 185.* 0.0.0.0 UG0  00 eth2
1.1.1.1 10.0.11.254 255.255.255.255 UGH   0  00 eth1
10.0.0.010.0.11.254 255.0.0.0   UG0  00 eth1
10.0.11.0   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth1
169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0  00 eth0
172.16.0.0  10.0.11.254 255.240.0.0 UG0  00 eth1
185.*   0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0   U 0  00 eth2
185.* 10.0.11.254 255.255.255.255 UGH   0  00 eth1
192.168.0.0 10.0.11.254 255.255.0.0 UG0  00 eth1

Management server is 185.*,10.0.11.31. Checking connectivity.
Good: Can connect to management server 185.* port 8250
Good: Can connect to management server 10.0.11.31 port 8250

Good: Java process is running

Tests Complete. Look for ERROR or WARNING above.
root@v-10-VM:/usr/local/cloud/systemvm#

 



Re: Cloudstack 4.15 on Ubuntu 20 issue

2023-07-20 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Seng,

Do you have different memory overprovisioning values on the cluster settings? I 
am assuming these hosts are in separate clusters. If that is the case you could 
refer https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7529
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7430


-Jithin

From: Hean Seng 
Date: Thursday, 20 July 2023 at 3:33 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Cloudstack 4.15 on Ubuntu 20 issue
Hi

I am facing issue on Cloudstack 4.15. KVM,  (ubuntu 20) agent,  i am
assigning 4000M RAM to a VM ,however  inside the VM , only it is getting
240M RAM.

Other of the hypervisor I am running Cloudstack on Ubuntu 18,and it has no
such issue.  Those VM that previously ran fine , transfer over here, it
seems to have this issue.

following is running at hypervisor , and seem statement 4000M is correct



/usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64 -name guest=i-2-9735-VM,debug-threads=on -S
-object 
secret,id=masterKey0,format=raw,file=/var/lib/libvirt/qemu/domain-2-i-2-9735-VM/master-key.aes
-machine pc-i440fx-4.2,accel=kvm,usb=off,dump-guest-core=off -cpu qemu64 -m
4000 -overcommit mem-lock=off -smp 2,sockets=2,cores=1,threads=1 -uuid
18eb1d52-1887-4d4d-94ae-7ba9916f06de -smbios type=1,manufacturer=Apache
Software Foundation,product=CloudStack KVM
Hypervisor,uuid=18eb1d52-1887-4d4d-94ae-7ba9916f06de -no-user-config
-nodefaults -chardev socket,id=charmonitor,fd=34,server,nowait -mon
chardev=charmonitor,id=monitor,mode=control -rtc base=utc -no-shutdown
-boot strict=on -device piix3-usb-uhci,id=usb,bus=pci.0,addr=0x1.0x2
-device virtio-serial-pci,id=virtio-serial0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x4 -blockdev
{"driver":"file","filename":"/mnt/bfb5965d-b463-3111-84a2-3f1609ffe81a/b4120a39-7a5a-47a7-a2b0-ecb850a46858","node-name":"libvirt-3-storage","cache":{"direct":true,"no-flush":false},"auto-read-only":true,"discard":"unmap"}
-blockdev
{"node-name":"libvirt-3-format","read-only":true,"cache":{"direct":true,"no-flush":false},"driver":"qcow2","file":"libvirt-3-storage","backing":null}
-blockdev
{"driver":"file","filename":"/mnt/bfb5965d-b463-3111-84a2-3f1609ffe81a/d2a84eb3-50c3-4928-8927-b40edebb3195","node-name":"libvirt-2-storage","cache":{"direct":true,"no-flush":false},"auto-read-only":true,"discard":"unmap"}
-blockdev
{"node-name":"libvirt-2-format","read-only":false,"cache":{"direct":true,"no-flush":false},"driver":"qcow2","file":"libvirt-2-storage","backing":"libvirt-3-format"}
-device
virtio-blk-pci,scsi=off,bus=pci.0,addr=0x5,drive=libvirt-2-format,id=virtio-disk0,bootindex=2,write-cache=on,serial=d2a84eb350c349288927
-device ide-cd,bus=ide.1,unit=0,id=ide0-1-0,bootindex=1 -netdev
tap,fd=36,id=hostnet0,vhost=on,vhostfd=37 -device
virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0,id=net0,mac=1e:00:0b:00:19:49,bus=pci.0,addr=0x3
-chardev pty,id=charserial0 -device
isa-serial,chardev=charserial0,id=serial0 -chardev
socket,id=charchannel0,fd=38,server,nowait -device
virtserialport,bus=virtio-serial0.0,nr=1,chardev=charchannel0,id=channel0,name=org.
qemu.guest_agent.0 -device usb-tablet,id=input0,bus=usb.0,port=1 -vnc
172.20.236.42:0,password -device cirrus-vga,id=video0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x2
-device i6300esb,id=watchdog0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x7 -watchdog-action none
-device virtio-balloon-pci,id=balloon0,bus=pci.0,addr=0x6 -sandbox
on,obsolete=deny,elevateprivileges=deny,spawn=deny,resourcecontrol=deny
-msg timestamp=on




--
Regards,
Hean Seng

 



Re: Async backup

2023-07-14 Thread Jithin Raju
The details are explained here: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Separate+creation+and+backup+operations+for+a+volume+snapshot


-Jithin

From: Granwille Strauss 
Date: Tuesday, 11 July 2023 at 1:20 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: Alex Mattioli , Nikolaos Tsinganos 

Subject: Re: Async backup

HI Alex

Sorry, I said this wrong, when making a snapshot a copy is first made to the 
primary storage, not management disk, and once done its moved to the secondary 
storage and then deleted from primary. This is explained here: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6836#issuecomment-1285524454

 

On 7/10/23 19:50, Alex Mattioli wrote:

all snapshots make a local copy to the management server disk before sending it 
to the secondary storage locations, yes.



What exactly do you mean by that?



From: Granwille Strauss 


Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 1:21 PM

To: users@cloudstack.apache.org

Cc: Nikolaos Tsinganos 

Subject: Re: Async backup





Correct me if I am wrong, all snapshots make a local copy to the management 
server disk before sending it to the secondary storage locations, yes. Async or 
not. But yes, I believe that is the case. However, when async is enabled you 
get to use and work on other tasks with the management server, while it does 
the snapshot process in the background. Whereas having async disabled, you are 
restricted from doing other task on the management server until the snapshot 
process completes, that's how I understand it.

On 7/10/23 13:04, Nikolaos Tsinganos wrote:



Thank you, Granwille for your prompt answer.







Can you elaborate on the "locally"  and "storage location" terms?



On a host that has multiple primary storages (e.g. NFS and some other storage 
over iSCSI)  but no local disks are used, what is considered as 'locally'?



Also, by "storage location"  do you mean the secondary storage?







Regards,



Nikolaos







From: Granwille Strauss 




Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 1:48 PM



To: 
users@cloudstack.apache.org



Cc: Nikolaos Tsinganos 




Subject: Re: Async backup







In short and in layman's terms, it makes the volume snapshot, stores it locally 
and then in the background transfers it to the storage location. This helps 
with server resource usage. But see attached screenshot for a detailed answer.



On 7/10/23 12:38, Nikolaos Tsinganos wrote:



Hi All,







Can somebody explain what the "Async backup" option does while taking volume 
snapshot?







Regards,



Nikolaos





--



Regards / Groete

[https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/logo/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/cd2904ba-304d-4a49-bf33-cbe9ac76d929_248x-.png]

Granwille Strauss  //  Senior Systems Admin



e: 
granwi...@namhost.com

m: +264 81 323 1260

w: 
www.namhost.com



[https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/social_icon_01/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/9151954b-b298-41aa-89c8-1d68af075373_48x48.png][https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/social_icon_02/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/85a9dc7c-7bd1-4958-85a9-e6a25baeb028_48x48.png][https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/social_icon_03/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/c1c5386c-914c-43cf-9d37-5b4aa8e317ab_48x48.png][https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/social_icon_04/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/3aaa7968-130e-48ec-821d-559a332cce47_48x48.png][https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/social_icon_05/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/3a8c09e6-588f-43a8-acfd-be4423fd3fb6_48x48.png]



[https://www.adsigner.com/v1/i/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/banner/940x300]

Namhost Internet Services (Pty) 

Re: ACS with vmware hypervisors

2023-07-10 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Gary,

I am unable to tell the cause of the VM deployment failures with the log 
snippets below.
Could you try adding the storage as a datastore in vCenter and add it to 
CloudStack as ‘presetup’ ?

-Jithin

From: Gary Dixon 
Date: Monday, 10 July 2023 at 2:12 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: RE: ACS with vmware hypervisors
Hi Jithin

We are using ACS 4.15.2 and vsphere esxi v7.0.3

This is the log output for job-42701:

2023-07-07 14:10:48,968 INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor] 
(API-Job-Executor-13:ctx-36699a50 job-42701) (logid:717a5506) Add job-42701 
into job monitoring
2023-07-07 14:10:49,189 INFO [o.a.c.a.c.u.v.StartVMCmd] 
(API-Job-Executor-13:ctx-36699a50 job-42701 ctx-a057c849) (logid:96c5f242) 
com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a 
deployment for VM[User|i-2-3207-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
2023-07-07 14:10:49,189 INFO [o.a.c.a.c.u.v.StartVMCmd] 
(API-Job-Executor-13:ctx-36699a50 job-42701 ctx-a057c849) (logid:96c5f242) 
Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-3207-VM]
2023-07-07 14:10:49,210 INFO [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobMonitor] 
(API-Job-Executor-13:ctx-36699a50 job-42701) (logid:96c5f242) Remove job-42701 
from job monitoring

Do we also need to add the iSCSI datatstore in vcenter as Primary storage to 
cloudstack UI?

BR

Gary
Gary Dixon​
Senior Technical Consultant
T:  +44 161 537 4990
E:  vms@quadris‑support.com
W: www.quadris.co.uk
[cid:image458271.png@D68BB0C8.6CA2D3B5]
The information contained in this e-mail from Quadris may be confidential and 
privileged for the private use of the named recipient.  The contents of this 
e-mail may not necessarily represent the official views of Quadris.  If you 
have received this information in error you must not copy, distribute or take 
any action or reliance on its contents.  Please destroy any hard copies and 
delete this message.
 


-Original Message-
From: Jithin Raju 
Sent: Monday, July 10, 2023 5:12 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: ACS with vmware hypervisors

Hi Gary,

What are the ACS and Vmware ESXi versions you are using? Could you share the 
entire logs for this day or job-42701?

-Jithin

From: Gary Dixon 
Date: Friday, 7 July 2023 at 8:49 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: ACS with vmware hypervisors






I was wondering if anyone has any experience with ACS and vmware ESXi as the 
hypervisor? I'm facing a problem when trying to deploy a new/fresh instance.

I've deployed a vCenter appliance, created a data centre, cluster(s) and the 
hosts have all been added to ACS. When I attempt to deploy a fresh instance to 
the vmware cluster/hosts to build the OS from an ISO, the following errors are 
displayed/logged:

UI Error:

Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-3207-VM]

Management Log:

..about 1/2 way into the error " at 
com.sun.proxy.$Proxy181.startVirtualMachine(Unknown Source)" is logged.

023-07-07 14:10:49,189 INFO [o.a.c.a.c.u.v.StartVMCmd] 
(API-Job-Executor-13:ctx-36699a50 job-42701 ctx-a057c849) (logid:96c5f242) 
Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-3207-VM]
com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a 
deployment for VM[User|i-2-3207-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; 
id=1 at 
org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VMEntityManagerImpl.reserveVirtualMachine(VMEntityManagerImpl.java:225)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VirtualMachineEntityImpl.reserve(VirtualMachineEntityImpl.java:202)
at 
com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:4937)
at 
com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:2897)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native 
Method) at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at 
org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:344)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:198)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:163)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.network.contrail.management.EventUtils$EventInterceptor.invoke(EventUtils.java:107)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:175)
at com.cloud.event.ActionEventInterceptor.invoke(ActionEventInterceptor.java:51)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:175)
at 
org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:97)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvoc

Re: Write Speeds

2023-07-09 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi  Groete,

The VM virtual NIC network throttling is picked up from its compute offering. 
You may need to create a new compute offering and change the VM’s compute 
offering. If it is not specified in the compute offering, means it is taking 
the values from the global settings: vm.network.throttling.rate .



-Jithin

From: Levin Ng 
Date: Sunday, 9 July 2023 at 5:00 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org , Granwille 
Strauss 
Cc: vivek.ku...@indiqus.com , Nux 
Subject: Re: Write Speeds
Dear Groete,

https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack/blob/965856057d5147f12b86abe5c9c205cdc5e44615/plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/main/java/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/DirectVifDriver.java

https://libvirt.org/formatnetwork.html#quality-of-service

This is in kilobytes/second, u have to divide by 8

1Gbps / 8bit = 128MB = 128000KBps

You can verify by iperf test, and yes, u need to ensure both VR and VM match 
bandwidth settings to get a consistent result, something u also need to pay 
attention on VR resource, default system router resource offering is quite 
limited, the network speed may throttled if VR running are out of CPU resource.

Regards,
Levin



On 8 Jul 2023 at 09:02 +0100, Granwille Strauss , wrote:
> Hi Levin
> Thank you very much, I do appreciate your feedback and time replying back to 
> me. I believe I have picked up on something. My VMs XML dump ALL show the 
> following:
> >> bridge='cloudbr0'/>   
> >> dev='vnet219'/>> name='net0'/>   > bus='0x00' slot='0x03' function='0x0'/> 
> Specifically:
>average='128000' peak='128000'/> 
> All my VM has this in place, a 128 Mbps limit even the VR, which makes no 
> sense. I found this thread posted 10 years ago and Nux says that this value 
> is affected by the service offerings: 
> https://users.cloudstack.apache.narkive.com/T6Gx7BoV/cloudstack-network-limitation
>  But all my service offerings are set to 1000 Mbps. See attached screenshots. 
> The 4.18 documentation also confirms if the values are null, which most 
> default service offerings are, it takes the values set in global settings 
> network.throttling.rate and vm.network.throttling.rate, which I also have set 
> as 1000 as you can see in the screenshots.
>
> I then found this: 
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Network+throttling+in+CloudStack
>  with no KVM details, seems this part is missing to tell me how KVM 
> throttling is applied. So as DuJun said 10 years ago, I feel confused about 
> how Cloudstack limit the network rate for guest. And yes, I have stopped my 
> VMs and rebooted MANY times it doesn't update the XML at all.
> Please also take into account documentation states that in shared networking 
> there's supposed to be no limits on incoming traffic (ingress), as far as I 
> understand it.
> On 7/7/23 23:35, Levin Ng wrote:
> > Hi Groete,
> >
> >
> > IMO, You should bypass any ACS provisioning to troubleshoot the performance 
> > case first, which allow you get more idea on the hardware + kvm performance 
> > with minimal influent, then you can compare the libvirt xml different 
> > between plain KVM and ACS. That help you sort out the different where it 
> > come from, you will see QoS bandwidth setting in the VM xml if you do.
> >
> > We are trying to tell you, when you diagnose the throughput problem, you 
> > should first identify the bottleneck where it come first.  Iperf is a tools 
> > that you can test the line speed end to end into your VM, if the result in 
> > 1Gbps network are near 800+ Mbps, you can focus on the VM performance or 
> > the copy protocol you are using, try different protocol, ssh/rsync/ftp/nfs, 
> > see any different.
> >
> > You are already test the write-back caching which will improve disk I/O 
> > performance, it is another story you need to deep dive the pro and cons on 
> > the write cache, there are risk to corrupt the VM filesystem in some case, 
> > this is what u need to learn about each cache mode.
> >
> > VM Guest performance are involved by many factor, you cannot expect VM 
> > perform nearly the bare metal does. There are long journey to do such 
> > optimization, take time and improve it gradually. There are lot of kvm 
> > tuning guide you can reference and prove it on your hardware. Read 
> > thoughtfully on each tuning that may bring improvement and also introduce 
> > risk factor.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Levin
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7 Jul 2023 at 21:24 +0100, Granwille Strauss , 
> > wrote:
> > > Sorry that I have to ask, can you perhaps be a bit more specific, please. 
> > > The only QOS settings I see in service offering are "None", "Hypervisor" 
> > > and "Storage", which doesn't really seem network related. Or am I missing 
> > > the point? Take note that I use the default offerings for the VR and VMs 
> > > but with slight tweaks such as setting local storage etc and only 
> > > increased the Network rate from 200 Mbps to 1000 Mbps.
> > >
> > > So can you kindly explain by what QOS settings 

Re: ACS with vmware hypervisors

2023-07-09 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Gary,

What are the ACS and Vmware ESXi versions you are using? Could you share the 
entire logs for this day or job-42701?

-Jithin

From: Gary Dixon 
Date: Friday, 7 July 2023 at 8:49 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: ACS with vmware hypervisors






I was wondering if anyone has any experience with ACS and vmware ESXi as the 
hypervisor? I'm facing a problem when trying to deploy a new/fresh instance.

I've deployed a vCenter appliance, created a data centre, cluster(s) and the 
hosts have all been added to ACS. When I attempt to deploy a fresh instance to 
the vmware cluster/hosts to build the OS from an ISO, the following errors are 
displayed/logged:

UI Error:

Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-3207-VM]

Management Log:

..about 1/2 way into the error " at 
com.sun.proxy.$Proxy181.startVirtualMachine(Unknown Source)" is logged.

023-07-07 14:10:49,189 INFO [o.a.c.a.c.u.v.StartVMCmd] 
(API-Job-Executor-13:ctx-36699a50 job-42701 ctx-a057c849) (logid:96c5f242) 
Unable to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-3207-VM]
com.cloud.exception.InsufficientServerCapacityException: Unable to create a 
deployment for VM[User|i-2-3207-VM]Scope=interface com.cloud.dc.DataCenter; id=1
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VMEntityManagerImpl.reserveVirtualMachine(VMEntityManagerImpl.java:225)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.engine.cloud.entity.api.VirtualMachineEntityImpl.reserve(VirtualMachineEntityImpl.java:202)
at 
com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:4937)
at 
com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.startVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:2897)
at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native 
Method)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
at 
java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
at 
org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection(AopUtils.java:344)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:198)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:163)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.network.contrail.management.EventUtils$EventInterceptor.invoke(EventUtils.java:107)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:175)
at com.cloud.event.ActionEventInterceptor.invoke(ActionEventInterceptor.java:51)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:175)
at 
org.springframework.aop.interceptor.ExposeInvocationInterceptor.invoke(ExposeInvocationInterceptor.java:97)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed(ReflectiveMethodInvocation.java:186)
at 
org.springframework.aop.framework.JdkDynamicAopProxy.invoke(JdkDynamicAopProxy.java:215)
at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy181.startVirtualMachine(Unknown Source)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.user.vm.StartVMCmd.execute(StartVMCmd.java:169)
at com.cloud.api.ApiDispatcher.dispatch(ApiDispatcher.java:156)
at com.cloud.api.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.runJob(ApiAsyncJobDispatcher.java:108)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.runInContext(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:620)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable$1.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:48)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext$1.call(DefaultManagedContext.java:55)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.callWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:102)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.impl.DefaultManagedContext.runWithContext(DefaultManagedContext.java:52)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.managed.context.ManagedContextRunnable.run(ManagedContextRunnable.java:45)
at 
org.apache.cloudstack.framework.jobs.impl.AsyncJobManagerImpl$5.run(AsyncJobManagerImpl.java:568)
at 
java.base/java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:515)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:264)
at 
java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1128)
at 
java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:628)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:829)

Gary Dixon​
Senior Technical Consultant
T:  +44 161 537 4990
E:  vms@quadris‑support.com
W: www.quadris.co.uk
[cid:image013124.png@F2392D3B.75942D07]
The information contained in this e-mail from Quadris may be confidential and 
privileged for the private use of the named recipient.  The contents of this 
e-mail may not necessarily represent the official views of Quadris.  If you 
have received this information in error you must not copy, distribute or take 
any action or reliance on its contents.  Please destroy any 

Re: Moving Storage traffic Label To New NIC

2023-06-22 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Joan,

I realized the delete traffic type is not available in the UI, but there is an 
API ‘deleteTrafficType’ . I deleted it using cloudmonkey, you could try the 
same:

[cid:image001.png@01D9A5BE.7DC17520]

I reported this as an improvement: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7677

[1] https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.18/apis/deleteTrafficType.html

-Jithin

From: Joan g 
Date: Thursday, 22 June 2023 at 11:53 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Moving Storage traffic Label To New NIC
Hello Jithin,

I have tried
  1.  Disabled the zone
  2.  Delete the SSVM
  3.  Delete the Ip range

But I am not sure where to remove the storage label. Could you please
elaborate on it.
Since the storage label is already there I am not able to add the same
label to 'Physical network 2'.

Regards,
Jon


On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 10:19 PM Jithin Raju 
wrote:

> Hi Joan,
>
> Could you try this:
>
>
>   1.  Disable the zone
>   2.  Delete the SSVM
>   3.  Delete the Ip range and the storage traffic from the old Physical
> network.
>
>
>
> -Jithin
>
> From: Joan g 
> Date: Thursday, 22 June 2023 at 6:07 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
> Subject: Moving Storage traffic Label To New NIC
> Hi Community,
>
> I am having a cloudstack 4.17.2  deployment with 4 KVM hosts and its
> running fine. The Setup was done using a single NIC.
> Now A new better NIC card was added to servers and I wish to use this NIC
> for the storage traffic.
> I have added a New Physical network using the UI but I am not able to
> assign the storage traffic to this NIC, because it's already in use with my
> NIC1.
>
> Is there any way I can delete the storage label from the 'Physical network
> 1' and add it to the new 'Physical network 2'
>
> Regards,
> Jon
>
>
>
>

 



Re: Moving Storage traffic Label To New NIC

2023-06-22 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Joan,

Could you try this:


  1.  Disable the zone
  2.  Delete the SSVM
  3.  Delete the Ip range and the storage traffic from the old Physical network.



-Jithin

From: Joan g 
Date: Thursday, 22 June 2023 at 6:07 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Moving Storage traffic Label To New NIC
Hi Community,

I am having a cloudstack 4.17.2  deployment with 4 KVM hosts and its
running fine. The Setup was done using a single NIC.
Now A new better NIC card was added to servers and I wish to use this NIC
for the storage traffic.
I have added a New Physical network using the UI but I am not able to
assign the storage traffic to this NIC, because it's already in use with my
NIC1.

Is there any way I can delete the storage label from the 'Physical network
1' and add it to the new 'Physical network 2'

Regards,
Jon

 



Re: Moving Multiple Shared IP ranges from one Guest network

2023-06-22 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Granwille,

I am not aware of any other other way than adding another IP range.

-Jithin

From: Granwille Strauss 
Date: Thursday, 22 June 2023 at 2:17 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: Jithin Raju 
Subject: Re: Moving Multiple Shared IP ranges from one Guest network

Hi Jithin

Yes, I understand that. This is an add-on question/problem if I do proceed with 
making these changes. In short, by creating a shared network for each IP range, 
once that range is fully used, you can no longer assign secondary IPs to VMs on 
the same NIC. So that would mean I need to add a new range to an existing 
shared network, just so that I can accomplish adding secondary IPs to a VM. 
Kinda defeating the purpose. Or is there a way around this.
On 6/22/23 10:42, Jithin Raju wrote:
Hi Granwille,

The steps I suggested doesn’t involve using secondary IPs, instead, there is 
another option change IP Address (CS 4.18) .  API: updateVmNicIp

[cid:part1.wm8BEXFm.ttgIam6p@namhost.com]

Once the IP ranges are freed up and you have created new networks you need to 
add a new network to the VM ( I believe this is what you are looking for).

[Ascreenshot of a computerDescription 
automatically generated with low confidence]

-Jithin





From: Granwille Strauss <mailto:granwi...@namhost.com>
Date: Thursday, 22 June 2023 at 1:54 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> 
<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: Jithin Raju <mailto:jithin.r...@shapeblue.com>
Subject: Re: Moving Multiple Shared IP ranges from one Guest network

Jithin,

Awesome thank you. Just one more question, I noticed a flaw or probably a lack 
of my understanding. When I have completed this process, and lets assume I have 
now maxed out all IPs on one shared network, how do I assign a secondary IP to 
a VM, but on the same NIC?

With the current setup I have, because I have more than one range in my 
existing network, I have the option to assign secondary IPs to an existing NIC 
for a VM. It seems by following the advice I was given this does not seem to be 
possible any more when my range is maxed on one shared network. Is there a way 
around this?

I created two new networks with each their own range now. But on my existing 
VMs, I do not see the option to add an IP address as a secondary IP to the 
existing NIC, because its on a different network. And for me to use the new 
network I have to assign an additional NIC, which is not really what I would 
want on a VPS.
On 6/22/23 10:12, Jithin Raju wrote:
Granwille,

Your understanding is correct.

If you want to assign the same IPs back to the original VMs you need to add the 
new network as additional NIC to the same VMs then change the new network to 
default and remove the old one.

-Jithin





From: Granwille Strauss <mailto:granwi...@namhost.com>
Date: Thursday, 22 June 2023 at 12:28 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> 
<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: Jithin Raju <mailto:jithin.r...@shapeblue.com>
Subject: Re: Moving Multiple Shared IP ranges from one Guest network

Hi Jithin

Thank you for getting back to me. Sorry, that came out wrong I make use of 
Advanced and not basic zone. That said, I am not sure I understand the 
following:

Identify the IP range VR uses that needs to be retained in the network

Change IP to the one range that you want to retain.

Since my network has three subnets that are being used by VMs and one VR, do I 
understand correctly that I need to leave one range in place, the range that is 
tied to the VRs public IP, yes? And then, for the other two ranges, after I 
have stopped VMs and changed their IPs I can remove those two ranges and create 
two new networks for each range. Will I then be able to assign the old IPs back 
to the VM afterwards?
On 6/22/23 08:46, Jithin Raju wrote:

Hi Granwille,



So you are using a basic zone and you have multiple subnets for the 
‘defaultGuestNetwork’ in the same pod?

You want to create new guest networks right, but that is not possible in a 
basic zone. You could add a new pod and add the new subnets there but within 
the same guest network.



If you are using an advanced zone with shared network you can follow the below 
steps:



Stop VM

Identify the IP range VR uses that needs to be retained in the network

Change IP to the one range that you want to retain.

Goto VM->NICs -> change IP



Once you change the IPs for all the VMs you should be able to delete the range 
from the existing network and create a new one.



-Jithin



From: Granwille Strauss 
<mailto:granwi...@namhost.com.INVALID>

Date: Wednesday, 21 June 2023 at 9:47 PM

To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> 
<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>

Subject: Moving Multiple Shared IP ranges from one Guest network



Hi Guys



I have basic private clo

Re: Moving Multiple Shared IP ranges from one Guest network

2023-06-22 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Granwille,

The steps I suggested doesn’t involve using secondary IPs, instead, there is 
another option change IP Address (CS 4.18) .  API: updateVmNicIp

[cid:image001.png@01D9A512.86B9FAF0]

Once the IP ranges are freed up and you have created new networks you need to 
add a new network to the VM ( I believe this is what you are looking for).

[A screenshot of a computer  Description automatically generated with low 
confidence]

-Jithin

From: Granwille Strauss 
Date: Thursday, 22 June 2023 at 1:54 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: Jithin Raju 
Subject: Re: Moving Multiple Shared IP ranges from one Guest network

Jithin,

Awesome thank you. Just one more question, I noticed a flaw or probably a lack 
of my understanding. When I have completed this process, and lets assume I have 
now maxed out all IPs on one shared network, how do I assign a secondary IP to 
a VM, but on the same NIC?

With the current setup I have, because I have more than one range in my 
existing network, I have the option to assign secondary IPs to an existing NIC 
for a VM. It seems by following the advice I was given this does not seem to be 
possible any more when my range is maxed on one shared network. Is there a way 
around this?

I created two new networks with each their own range now. But on my existing 
VMs, I do not see the option to add an IP address as a secondary IP to the 
existing NIC, because its on a different network. And for me to use the new 
network I have to assign an additional NIC, which is not really what I would 
want on a VPS.
On 6/22/23 10:12, Jithin Raju wrote:
Granwille,

Your understanding is correct.

If you want to assign the same IPs back to the original VMs you need to add the 
new network as additional NIC to the same VMs then change the new network to 
default and remove the old one.

-Jithin





From: Granwille Strauss <mailto:granwi...@namhost.com>
Date: Thursday, 22 June 2023 at 12:28 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> 
<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Cc: Jithin Raju <mailto:jithin.r...@shapeblue.com>
Subject: Re: Moving Multiple Shared IP ranges from one Guest network

Hi Jithin

Thank you for getting back to me. Sorry, that came out wrong I make use of 
Advanced and not basic zone. That said, I am not sure I understand the 
following:

Identify the IP range VR uses that needs to be retained in the network

Change IP to the one range that you want to retain.

Since my network has three subnets that are being used by VMs and one VR, do I 
understand correctly that I need to leave one range in place, the range that is 
tied to the VRs public IP, yes? And then, for the other two ranges, after I 
have stopped VMs and changed their IPs I can remove those two ranges and create 
two new networks for each range. Will I then be able to assign the old IPs back 
to the VM afterwards?
On 6/22/23 08:46, Jithin Raju wrote:

Hi Granwille,



So you are using a basic zone and you have multiple subnets for the 
‘defaultGuestNetwork’ in the same pod?

You want to create new guest networks right, but that is not possible in a 
basic zone. You could add a new pod and add the new subnets there but within 
the same guest network.



If you are using an advanced zone with shared network you can follow the below 
steps:



Stop VM

Identify the IP range VR uses that needs to be retained in the network

Change IP to the one range that you want to retain.

Goto VM->NICs -> change IP



Once you change the IPs for all the VMs you should be able to delete the range 
from the existing network and create a new one.



-Jithin



From: Granwille Strauss 
<mailto:granwi...@namhost.com.INVALID>

Date: Wednesday, 21 June 2023 at 9:47 PM

To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> 
<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>

Subject: Moving Multiple Shared IP ranges from one Guest network



Hi Guys



I have basic private cloud setup. I have one guest network that contains three 
shared public IP subnet ranges consisting of /28 and /29 ranges. I have been 
recently advised that it would be better to make a guest network for each 
subnet range instead of having them all under one network.



The issue is, I already have VMs assigned to those public IP ranges and they're 
currently running. What would be the best way to solve this? Can I just remove 
the ranges from the existing network and quickly add a new network with those 
ranges and have a new VR boot up? Would it then continue to run on the existing 
VMs? I reckon I need to have the VMs stopped first in any case, yes? Also, I 
have ZERO API experience so this needs to happen all via UI.

--



Regards / Groete

[Image removed by sender.]<https://www.namhost.com/><https://www.namhost.com/>

Granwille Strauss  //  Senior Systems Admin



e: 
granwi...@namhost.com<mailto:granwi...@namhost.com><mailto:granwi.

Re: Moving Multiple Shared IP ranges from one Guest network

2023-06-22 Thread Jithin Raju
Granwille,

Your understanding is correct.

If you want to assign the same IPs back to the original VMs you need to add the 
new network as additional NIC to the same VMs then change the new network to 
default and remove the old one.

-Jithin

From: Granwille Strauss 
Date: Thursday, 22 June 2023 at 12:28 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: Jithin Raju 
Subject: Re: Moving Multiple Shared IP ranges from one Guest network

Hi Jithin

Thank you for getting back to me. Sorry, that came out wrong I make use of 
Advanced and not basic zone. That said, I am not sure I understand the 
following:

Identify the IP range VR uses that needs to be retained in the network

Change IP to the one range that you want to retain.

Since my network has three subnets that are being used by VMs and one VR, do I 
understand correctly that I need to leave one range in place, the range that is 
tied to the VRs public IP, yes? And then, for the other two ranges, after I 
have stopped VMs and changed their IPs I can remove those two ranges and create 
two new networks for each range. Will I then be able to assign the old IPs back 
to the VM afterwards?
On 6/22/23 08:46, Jithin Raju wrote:

Hi Granwille,



So you are using a basic zone and you have multiple subnets for the 
‘defaultGuestNetwork’ in the same pod?

You want to create new guest networks right, but that is not possible in a 
basic zone. You could add a new pod and add the new subnets there but within 
the same guest network.



If you are using an advanced zone with shared network you can follow the below 
steps:



Stop VM

Identify the IP range VR uses that needs to be retained in the network

Change IP to the one range that you want to retain.

Goto VM->NICs -> change IP



Once you change the IPs for all the VMs you should be able to delete the range 
from the existing network and create a new one.



-Jithin



From: Granwille Strauss 
<mailto:granwi...@namhost.com.INVALID>

Date: Wednesday, 21 June 2023 at 9:47 PM

To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> 
<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>

Subject: Moving Multiple Shared IP ranges from one Guest network



Hi Guys



I have basic private cloud setup. I have one guest network that contains three 
shared public IP subnet ranges consisting of /28 and /29 ranges. I have been 
recently advised that it would be better to make a guest network for each 
subnet range instead of having them all under one network.



The issue is, I already have VMs assigned to those public IP ranges and they're 
currently running. What would be the best way to solve this? Can I just remove 
the ranges from the existing network and quickly add a new network with those 
ranges and have a new VR boot up? Would it then continue to run on the existing 
VMs? I reckon I need to have the VMs stopped first in any case, yes? Also, I 
have ZERO API experience so this needs to happen all via UI.

--



Regards / Groete

[Image removed by sender.]<https://www.namhost.com/><https://www.namhost.com/>

Granwille Strauss  //  Senior Systems Admin



e: 
granwi...@namhost.com<mailto:granwi...@namhost.com><mailto:granwi...@namhost.com><mailto:granwi...@namhost.com>

m: +264 81 323 1260

w: 
www.namhost.com<http://www.namhost.com><https://www.namhost.com/><https://www.namhost.com/>



[Image removed by 
sender.]<https://www.facebook.com/namhost><https://www.facebook.com/namhost>[Image
 removed by 
sender.]<https://twitter.com/namhost><https://twitter.com/namhost>[Image 
removed by 
sender.]<https://www.instagram.com/namhostinternetservices/><https://www.instagram.com/namhostinternetservices/>[Image
 removed by 
sender.]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/namhos><https://www.linkedin.com/company/namhos>[Image
 removed by 
sender.]<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTd5v-kVPaic_dguGur15AA><https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTd5v-kVPaic_dguGur15AA>



[Image removed by 
sender.]<https://www.adsigner.com/v1/l/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/banner><https://www.adsigner.com/v1/l/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/banner>

Namhost Internet Services (Pty) Ltd,



24 Black Eagle Rd, Hermanus, 7210, RSA



The content of this message is confidential. If you have received it by 
mistake, please inform us by email reply and then delete the message. It is 
forbidden to copy, forward, or in any way reveal the contents of this message 
to anyone without our explicit consent. The integrity and security of this 
email cannot be guaranteed over the Internet. Therefore, the sender will not be 
held liable for any damage caused by the message. For our full privacy policy 
and disclaimers, please go to https://www.namhost.com/privacy-policy



[Image removed by sender. Powered by 
AdSigner]<https://www.adsigner.com/v1/c/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621

Re: Moving Multiple Shared IP ranges from one Guest network

2023-06-22 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Granwille,

So you are using a basic zone and you have multiple subnets for the 
‘defaultGuestNetwork’ in the same pod?
You want to create new guest networks right, but that is not possible in a 
basic zone. You could add a new pod and add the new subnets there but within 
the same guest network.

If you are using an advanced zone with shared network you can follow the below 
steps:

Stop VM
Identify the IP range VR uses that needs to be retained in the network
Change IP to the one range that you want to retain.
Goto VM->NICs -> change IP

Once you change the IPs for all the VMs you should be able to delete the range 
from the existing network and create a new one.

-Jithin

From: Granwille Strauss 
Date: Wednesday, 21 June 2023 at 9:47 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Moving Multiple Shared IP ranges from one Guest network

Hi Guys

I have basic private cloud setup. I have one guest network that contains three 
shared public IP subnet ranges consisting of /28 and /29 ranges. I have been 
recently advised that it would be better to make a guest network for each 
subnet range instead of having them all under one network.

The issue is, I already have VMs assigned to those public IP ranges and they're 
currently running. What would be the best way to solve this? Can I just remove 
the ranges from the existing network and quickly add a new network with those 
ranges and have a new VR boot up? Would it then continue to run on the existing 
VMs? I reckon I need to have the VMs stopped first in any case, yes? Also, I 
have ZERO API experience so this needs to happen all via UI.
--

Regards / Groete
[Image removed by sender.]
Granwille Strauss  //  Senior Systems Admin

e: granwi...@namhost.com
m: +264 81 323 1260
w: www.namhost.com

[Image removed by sender.][Image removed by 
sender.][Image removed by 
sender.][Image removed by 
sender.][Image removed by 
sender.]

[Image removed by 
sender.]
Namhost Internet Services (Pty) Ltd,

24 Black Eagle Rd, Hermanus, 7210, RSA

The content of this message is confidential. If you have received it by 
mistake, please inform us by email reply and then delete the message. It is 
forbidden to copy, forward, or in any way reveal the contents of this message 
to anyone without our explicit consent. The integrity and security of this 
email cannot be guaranteed over the Internet. Therefore, the sender will not be 
held liable for any damage caused by the message. For our full privacy policy 
and disclaimers, please go to https://www.namhost.com/privacy-policy

[Image removed by sender. Powered by 
AdSigner]

 



Re: IPv4 + IPv6 Networks with IPv6 as Default

2023-06-21 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Loth,

I could create an IPv6 only shared network but we can’t use virtual router as a 
service provider hence I used ‘quickcloudnoservices’ offering.

-Jithin

From: Loth 
Date: Wednesday, 21 June 2023 at 1:16 PM
To: users 
Subject: IPv4 + IPv6 Networks with IPv6 as Default
Hello Users,

I'm trying to setup a new shared (Direct Attached) network that
defaults to 1x IPv6 address and have optional IPv4 addresses. Is this
possible in 4.18 and if so, which services are supported?

I tried creating an instance with a "Dual Stack" network and could
only end up with both IP's.

Thanks for any information you can provide.

 



Re: SSVM routing issue

2023-06-20 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Antonine,

>I also tried to define the storage traffic type with VLAN 53; the VLAN/VNI 
>column shows blank,

I see the same issue with CS 4.18 too, this appears to be a bug could you 
report this in github? In my testing the VLAN is present in cloud. 
dc_storage_network_ip_range record and the same is present in the API response 
for API listStorageNetworkIpRange as well. Just that it is not displayed in the 
UI.

Could you try removing the VLAN tag 53 from the bridge Cloudbr53 and let 
cloudstack configure the storage VLAN?

>Is the storage definition only or mainly used for the SSVM?

Only for SSVM.

-Jithin

From: Antoine Boucher 
Date: Wednesday, 21 June 2023 at 12:14 AM
To: stanley.bur...@gmail.com , users 

Subject: Re: SSVM routing issue
Hi Stanley,

You will find the answers below.



Antoine Boucher
antoi...@haltondc.com
[o] +1-226-505-9734
www.haltondc.com

“Data security made simple”



 

> On May 24, 2023, at 8:59 PM, Stanley Burkee  wrote:
>
> Hi Antoine,
>
>
> Please share the cloudstack version you are using. Also check if you have
> connectivity between your management network & storage network.

4.17.2.0




>
> Please share the management server logs & your zone cloudbr0 & other
> interfaces configurations.

Here is my CentOS network config: (Management Server and Some Clusters)

[root@nimbus network-scripts]# cat ifcfg*
DEVICE=bond0
ONBOOT=yes
BONDING_OPTS="mode=6"
BRIDGE=cloudbr0
NM_CONTROLLED=no


DEVICE=bond0.53
VLAN=yes
BOOTPROTO=static
ONBOOT=yes
TYPE=Unknown
BRIDGE=cloudbr53


DEVICE=bond1
ONBOOT=yes
BONDING_OPTS="mode=6"
BRIDGE=cloudbr1
NM_CONTROLLED=no


DEVICE=cloudbr0
ONBOOT=yes
TYPE=Bridge
IPADDR=10.101.2.40
NETMASK=255.255.252.0
GATEWAY=10.101.0.1
DOMAIN="haltondc.net"
DEFROUTE=yes
NM_CONTROLLED=no
DELAY=0


DEVICE=cloudbr1
ONBOOT=yes
TYPE=Bridge
NM_CONTROLLED=no
DELAY=0


DEVICE=cloudbr53
ONBOOT=yes
TYPE=Bridge
VLAN=yes
IPADDR=10.101.6.40
#GATEWAY=10.101.6.1
NETMASK=255.255.254.0
NM_CONTROLLED=no
DELAY=0


DEVICE=eno1
TYPE=Ethernet
USERCTL=no
MASTER=bond1
SLAVE=yes
BOOTPROTO=none
NM_CONTROLLED=no
ONBOOT=yes

DEVICE=eno2
TYPE=Ethernet
USERCTL=no
MASTER=bond1
SLAVE=yes
BOOTPROTO=none
NM_CONTROLLED=no
ONBOOT=yes
DEVICE=eno3
TYPE=Ethernet
USERCTL=no
MASTER=bond1
SLAVE=yes
BOOTPROTO=none
NM_CONTROLLED=no
ONBOOT=yes
DEVICE=eno4
TYPE=Ethernet
USERCTL=no
#MASTER=bond1
#SLAVE=yes
#BOOTPROTO=none
NM_CONTROLLED=no
ONBOOT=no
DEVICE=ens2f0
TYPE=Ethernet
USERCTL=no
MASTER=bond0
SLAVE=yes
BOOTPROTO=none
NM_CONTROLLED=no
ONBOOT=yes


DEVICE=ens2f1
TYPE=Ethernet
USERCTL=no
MASTER=bond0
SLAVE=yes
BOOTPROTO=none
NM_CONTROLLED=no
ONBOOT=yes


DEVICE=lo
IPADDR=127.0.0.1
NETMASK=255.0.0.0
NETWORK=127.0.0.0
# If you're having problems with gated making 127.0.0.0/8 a martian,
# you can change this to something else (255.255.255.255, for example)
BROADCAST=127.255.255.255
ONBOOT=yes
NAME=loopback


Here is my Ubuntu 20/22 network config: (Most Clusters)

root@cs-kvm01:~# cat /etc/netplan/00-installer-config.yaml
network:
  version: 2
  ethernets:
eno1: {}
eno2: {}
ens2f0:
  mtu: 1500
ens2f1:
  mtu: 1500
  bonds:
bond0:
  interfaces:
  - ens2f0
  - ens2f1
  mtu: 1500
  parameters:
mode: balance-alb
bond1:
  interfaces:
  - eno1
  - eno2
  nameservers:
addresses: []
search: []
  parameters:
mode: balance-alb
  vlans:
bond0.53:
  id: 53
  link: bond0
  mtu: 1500
  bridges:
cloudbr0:
  interfaces: [bond0]
  mtu: 1500
  addresses:
  - 10.101.2.42/22
  gateway4: 10.101.0.1
  nameservers:
addresses:
- 10.101.0.1
search:
- haltondc.net
- haltondc.com
  dhcp4: no
  dhcp6: no
cloudbr1:
  interfaces: [bond1]
  mtu: 1500
  dhcp4: no
  dhcp6: no
cloudbr53:
  interfaces: [bond0.53]
  mtu: 1500
  addresses:
  - 10.101.6.42/23
  dhcp4: no
  dhcp6: no



>
> Thanks.
>
> Best Regards
> Stanley
>
> On Mon, 15 May 2023, 6:00 pm Antoine Boucher,  > wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Would anyone have clues on my on going SSVM issue below?
>>
>> However, I can work around the issue by deleting my Storage Network
>> traffic definition and recreating the SSVM..
>>
>> What would be the impact of deleting the Storage Network traffic
>> definition on other part of the system? My Primary Storage configuration
>> seems to all be done part of my hosts static configuration.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Antoine
>>
>>
>>> On May 11, 2023, at 10:27 AM, Antoine Boucher 
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Good morning/afternoon/evening,
>>>
>>> I am following up with my SSVM routing issue when a Storage Network is
>> defined.
>>>
>>> I have a zone with Xen and KVM servers that have a Storage Network
>> defined as Cloudbr53 with a storage network-specific subnet (Cloudbr0 is
>> also defined for Management and Cloudbr1 for Guests)
>>>
>>> The Cloudbr53 bridge is “hard coded” 

Re: dedicated secondary storage

2023-06-20 Thread Jithin Raju
It’s not available now I think , could be a new feature.

-Jithin

From: m...@swen.io 
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2023 9:01:09 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: dedicated secondary storage

Hi all,



is it possible to create a secondary storage dedicated to a domain? Thx for
a quick reply. :-)



regards,

Swen


 



Re: Endless logs on ACS Management Server - Copy templates between storage

2023-06-09 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Ricardo,

If you prefer to avoid using this KVM systemVM template you could delete this 
one? If the same template download message is repeated you could look into the 
SSVM logs as well to see why its not downloading ?

-Jithin

From: Ricardo Pertuz 
Date: Wednesday, 7 June 2023 at 11:14 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Endless logs on ACS Management Server - Copy templates between storage
Hi,

On my ACS 4.18 I have endless logs, many day and every ms

2023-06-07 12:39:59,425 DEBUG [c.c.a.m.ClusteredAgentAttache] 
(AgentManager-Handler-5:null) (logid:) Seq 49-296956100429745222: Forwarding 
Seq 49-296956100429745222:  { Cmd , MgmtId: 134293372377188, via: 49, Ver: v1, 
Flags: 100111, 
[{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.command.CopyCommand":{"srcTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"path":"35ec522e-1692-4fba-89cd-9605238648f4","origUrl":"http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.18/systemvmtemplate-4.18.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2","uuid":"35ec522e-1692-4fba-89cd-9605238648f4","id":"423","format":"QCOW2","accountId":"2","checksum":"{SHA-512}1994b0d7b48c257b5b13fe53e2d7cd49072db12e1a519a4c217659d5ac4de67d176a19616127b5516df3671fb38cfaf5bc8817459a4b41aef66040dc9b757e0d","hvm":"false","displayText":"systemvm-kvm-4.18.0","imageDataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"e09b8698-39f5-3676-8b4d-46cd939f12b4","name":"co-centro1a-control-sbx-primary03","id":"6","poolType":"NetworkFilesystem","host":"192.168.200.114","path":"/data/primary","port":"2049","url":"NetworkFilesystem://192.168.200.114/data/primary/?ROLE=Primary=e09b8698-39f5-3676-8b4d-46cd939f12b4","isManaged":"false"}},"name":"423-2-359fccdb-e7ae-35af-9c79-4cfefedb1067","size
 
http://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.18/systemvmtemplate-4.18.0-kvm.qcow2.bz2%22,%22uuid%22:%2235ec522e-1692-4fba-89cd-9605238648f4%22,%22id%22:%22423%22,%22format%22:%22QCOW2%22,%22accountId%22:%222%22,%22checksum%22:%22%7BSHA-512%7D1994b0d7b48c257b5b13fe53e2d7cd49072db12e1a519a4c217659d5ac4de67d176a19616127b5516df3671fb38cfaf5bc8817459a4b41aef66040dc9b757e0d%22,%22hvm%22:%22false%22,%22displayText%22:%22systemvm-kvm-4.18.0%22,%22imageDataStore%22:%7B%22org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO%22:%7B%22uuid%22:%22e09b8698-39f5-3676-8b4d-46cd939f12b4%22,%22name%22:%22co-centro1a-control-sbx-primary03%22,%22id%22:%226%22,%22poolType%22:%22NetworkFilesystem%22,%22host%22:%22192.168.200.114%22,%22path%22:%22/data/primary%22,%22port%22:%222049%22,%22url%22:%22NetworkFilesystem://192.168.200.114/data/primary/?ROLE=Primary=e09b8698-39f5-3676-8b4d-46cd939f12b4%22,%22isManaged%22:%22false%22}},%22name%22:%22423-2-359fccdb-e7ae-35af-9c79-4cfefedb1067%22,%22size
 ":"(4.88 GB) 
524288","hypervisorType":"KVM","bootable":"false","uniqueName":"423-2-359fccdb-e7ae-35af-9c79-4cfefedb1067","directDownload":"false","deployAsIs":"false"}},"destTO":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.VolumeObjectTO":{"uuid":"26c12637-f557-4fa1-8349-d8d8a049ddec","volumeType":"ROOT","dataStore":{"org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.PrimaryDataStoreTO":{"uuid":"e09b8698-39f5-3676-8b4d-46cd939f12b4","name":"co-centro1a-control-sbx-primary03","id":"6","poolType":"NetworkFilesystem","host":"192.168.200.114","path":"/data/primary","port":"2049","url":"NetworkFilesystem://192.168.200.114/data/primary/?ROLE=Primary=e09b8698-39f5-3676-8b4d-46cd939f12b4","isManaged":"false"}},"name":"ROOT-9859","size":"(4.88
 GB) 
524288","volumeId":"11106","vmName":"r-9859-VM","accountId":"172","format":"QCOW2","provisioningType":"THIN","poolId":"6","id":"11106","deviceId":"0","hypervisorType":"KVM","directDownload":"false","deployAsIs":"false"}},"executeInSequence":"true","options":{},"options2":{},"wait":"0","bypassHostMaintenance":"false"}}]
 } to 262699919842878

How do I stop this process?


Ricardo Pertuz
CTO

 



Re: [External] NFS : Primary storage is not getting added in apache cloud stack

2023-06-07 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Ashish,

Could you check the status of the hosts in the cluster, atleast one in ‘up’ 
state?

-Jithin

From: Daan Hoogland 
Date: Wednesday, 7 June 2023 at 1:49 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [External] NFS : Primary storage is not getting added in apache 
cloud stack
Ashish,
please add more information:
What are the versions of ACS and hypervisor you are using?
What is the sequence of commands you perform to achieve your goals?
What are the output and logs at the time?

As a general note, you don't add an NFS share as a disk but as a
storage and ACS creates disks on it.

On Wed, Jun 7, 2023 at 9:59 AM Ashish Bagayatkar
 wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to add an NFS drive as a primary disk on the Apache stack. But it 
> is getting failed with the following message.
>
> Failed to add data store: No host up to associate a storage pool within 
> cluster 1
>
> How to resolve this? I tried all possible options. Please Help.
>
> Regards
> Ashish Bagayatkar
>
> This
>  message is for the named addresses' use only. It may contain NSDL 
> confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. If you receive 
> this message in error, please immediately delete it. You must not, directly 
> or indirectly,use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this 
> message if you are not the intended recipient. Unless otherwise stated, any 
> commercial information given in this message does not constitute an offer to 
> deal on any terms quoted. Any reference to the terms of executed transactions 
> should be treated as preliminary only and subject to our formal written 
> confirmation.
> ***
>


--
Daan

 



Re: Cloudstack4.18 usable memory is showing less than allocated memory

2023-05-31 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Stanley,

Once I increase the memory over provisioning to 1.2 from 1 in the cluster 
settings then stop and start the VM the Guest OS gets only 5GB please check 
whether that is the case with you.

select * from user_vm_details where name='memoryOvercommitRatio' and 
vm_id=531588;
+++---+---+-+
| id | vm_id  | name  | value | display |
+++---+---+-+
| 534682 | 531588 | memoryOvercommitRatio | 1.2   |   1 |

-Jithin

From: Jithin Raju 
Date: Thursday, 1 June 2023 at 10:39 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack4.18 usable memory is showing less than allocated memory
Hi Stanley,

Thanks for sharing the screenshots. I tested this in my lab env but I there 
Windows does show 6GB as expected. Could you check the memory configuration in 
the KVM host for your VM?

virsh dumpxml 6 | grep -i mem
  6291456
  6291456




-Jithin

From: Stanley Burkee 
Date: Thursday, 1 June 2023 at 9:28 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack4.18 usable memory is showing less than allocated memory
Hi Jithin,

I am sharing the gdrive link to see the screenshots.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Xp8ZkBnSSoGkcQodHdD0tMw_hEoZVst8/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LsILiFmnhX0nrM-w7pC9OJwLYdKHw2a8/view?usp=sharing

Thanks a lot.

Regards

Stanley Burkee

On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 9:23 AM Stanley Burkee 
wrote:

> Hi Jithin,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I am attaching the screenshot in attachment. Please
> check if you are still having issues checking them.
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards
>
> Stanley Burkee
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 9:19 AM Jithin Raju 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stanley,
>>
>> The screenshots are not displayed for me, do you have another way to
>> share the screenshots?
>> Which hypervisor you are using? Is any memory over-provisioning
>> configured?
>> What about other guest OS such as any Linux distro or other versions of
>> Windows?
>>
>> -Jithin
>>
>> From: Stanley Burkee 
>> Date: Wednesday, 31 May 2023 at 8:38 PM
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ,
>> d...@cloudstack.apache.org 
>> Subject: Cloudstack4.18 usable memory is showing less than allocated
>> memory
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I am experiencing an issue with Cloudstack 4.18. I have allocated 6 GB
>> memory to a Windows server 2019 but when I log into the VM the usable
>> memory is showing 5 GB. Any help will be appreciated.
>>
>> Screenshots given below
>>
>> [cid:ii_libu7nmg0]
>>
>> [cid:ii_libucx9m1]
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Stanley Burkee
>>
>>
>>
>>



 



Re: Cloudstack4.18 usable memory is showing less than allocated memory

2023-05-31 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Stanley,

Thanks for sharing the screenshots. I tested this in my lab env but I there 
Windows does show 6GB as expected. Could you check the memory configuration in 
the KVM host for your VM?

virsh dumpxml 6 | grep -i mem
  6291456
  6291456




-Jithin

From: Stanley Burkee 
Date: Thursday, 1 June 2023 at 9:28 AM
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Cloudstack4.18 usable memory is showing less than allocated memory
Hi Jithin,

I am sharing the gdrive link to see the screenshots.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Xp8ZkBnSSoGkcQodHdD0tMw_hEoZVst8/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1LsILiFmnhX0nrM-w7pC9OJwLYdKHw2a8/view?usp=sharing

Thanks a lot.

Regards

Stanley Burkee

On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 9:23 AM Stanley Burkee 
wrote:

> Hi Jithin,
>
> Thanks for your reply. I am attaching the screenshot in attachment. Please
> check if you are still having issues checking them.
>
> Thanks
>
> Regards
>
> Stanley Burkee
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2023 at 9:19 AM Jithin Raju 
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Stanley,
>>
>> The screenshots are not displayed for me, do you have another way to
>> share the screenshots?
>> Which hypervisor you are using? Is any memory over-provisioning
>> configured?
>> What about other guest OS such as any Linux distro or other versions of
>> Windows?
>>
>> -Jithin
>>
>> From: Stanley Burkee 
>> Date: Wednesday, 31 May 2023 at 8:38 PM
>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ,
>> d...@cloudstack.apache.org 
>> Subject: Cloudstack4.18 usable memory is showing less than allocated
>> memory
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I am experiencing an issue with Cloudstack 4.18. I have allocated 6 GB
>> memory to a Windows server 2019 but when I log into the VM the usable
>> memory is showing 5 GB. Any help will be appreciated.
>>
>> Screenshots given below
>>
>> [cid:ii_libu7nmg0]
>>
>> [cid:ii_libucx9m1]
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Stanley Burkee
>>
>>
>>
>>

 



Re: Cloudstack4.18 usable memory is showing less than allocated memory

2023-05-31 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Stanley,

The screenshots are not displayed for me, do you have another way to share the 
screenshots?
Which hypervisor you are using? Is any memory over-provisioning configured?
What about other guest OS such as any Linux distro or other versions of Windows?

-Jithin

From: Stanley Burkee 
Date: Wednesday, 31 May 2023 at 8:38 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org , 
d...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Cloudstack4.18 usable memory is showing less than allocated memory
Hi Guys,

I am experiencing an issue with Cloudstack 4.18. I have allocated 6 GB memory 
to a Windows server 2019 but when I log into the VM the usable memory is 
showing 5 GB. Any help will be appreciated.

Screenshots given below

[cid:ii_libu7nmg0]

[cid:ii_libucx9m1]


Thanks in advance

Regards

Stanley Burkee

 



Re: Introductions

2023-05-25 Thread Jithin Raju
Welcome Ayush.

-Jithin

From: Ayush Pandey 
Date: Friday, 26 May 2023 at 10:21 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Introductions
Hi Everyone,

I am Ayush Pandey, joining the community for a project as part of Google
Summer of code 2023. I will be working with my mentor Nicolas Vazquez on
"Extend Import-Export Instances to the KVM Hypervisor"
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7127

I am really looking forward to collaborating with and learning from this
amazing community.

Thank you,
Regards,
Ayush Pandey

 



Re: IP Spoofing and IP Theft

2023-05-18 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Willard,

I believe there is something implemented using iptables,ebtables to prevent IP 
spoofing for security group enabled zones. You need to take this into account 
if you are using security group enabled zones.

-Jithin

From: Will Conrad 
Date: Thursday, 18 May 2023 at 1:08 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: IP Spoofing and IP Theft
Hello Community!

It looks like cloudstack has built-iin protection to prevent IP spoofing, I
am wondering what kind (if any) of protections cloudstack has built-in to
protect the environment from IP theft, or is this a consideration that
should be taken into account when designing the network layout and
offerings for tenants?

Regards,

Willard Conrad
DevOps Engineer
Hivelocity, LLC

 



Re: Managing Security bewteen account in Advanced Zone without SG

2023-05-18 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Pratik,

You probably want to create a new custom ACL list and add your own ACL rules. 
Go to the tier and replace the ‘default_allow’ ACL list with the new one.

-Jithin

From: Pratik Chandrakar 
Date: Wednesday, 17 May 2023 at 8:33 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Managing Security bewteen account in Advanced Zone without SG
Hi  Loges,
Thanks for the update.

On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 12:59 PM Logeswaran T
 wrote:

> Hi Pratik,
>
> We now have a request open in cloudstack github for a VPC ACL issue.
>
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7483
>
> The changes are tracked in this thread.
>
> Regards,
> Loges
> www.stackbill.com
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:28 AM Pratik Chandrakar <
> chandrakarpra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > Curious to know how others are managing isolation between VMs of
> different
> > accounts in the Advanced Zone without SG deployment, as most users opt
> for
> > default_allow policy for their VPC. Because of default_allow policy all
> > ports are opened between public ip (static nat) irrespective of VLAN used
> > in VPC. Is there any option to remove default_allow policy for VPC so
> that
> > it can't be selected or any other method available?
> > Please advise
> >
> > --
> > *Regards,*
> > *Pratik Chandrakar*
> >
>
> --
>
>
>
>
> *This E-mail is confidential. It may also be legally privileged. If you
> are not the addressee you may not copy, forward, disclose or use any part
> of
> it. If you have received this message in error, please delete it and all
> copies
> from your system and notify the sender immediately by return E-mail.
> Internet
> communications cannot be guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or
> virus-free.
> The sender does not accept liability for any errors or
> omissions*
>


--
*Regards,*
*Pratik Chandrakar*

 



Re: [ANNOUNCE] Cloudmonkey 6.3.0 Release

2023-05-09 Thread Jithin Raju
Great job Bobby ! thanks.

-Jithin

From: Wei ZHOU 
Date: Tuesday, 9 May 2023 at 10:34 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Cloudmonkey 6.3.0 Release
Great news.

Great job Bobby! Thanks.

-Wei

On Tuesday, 9 May 2023, Boris Stoyanov  wrote:

> We are pleased to announce the release of Apache CloudStack Cloudmonkey
> 6.3.0, the latest version of the popular command-line interface tool for
> managing Apache CloudStack environments.
>
> Cloudmonkey 6.3.0 comes packed with several new features, enhancements,
> and bug fixes to make it even more robust and reliable. Some of the key
> highlights of this release include:
>
> Add support for ARM64 Darwin/OSX build in Makefile
> Autocompletion on storage pool related APIs
> Enable profile information passing through commandline
> Profile caching improvements and bugfixes
> Fix: reuse cmk's CLI params to call piped cmd
> Maintenance changes - github actions/travis migration, dependencies
> upgrades,
> Various bug fixes
> Fixes handling of invalid timeout value
> Fixes csv output
>
> Cloudmonkey 6.3.0 is available for download now from the Apache CloudStack
> website. For more information on the release, including a full list of new
> features and bug fixes, please refer to the release notes.
>
>
> Downloads and Documentation  The official source code for CloudMonkey
> v6.3.0 can be downloaded from http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html.
>
> CloudMonkey's usage details are documented at https://github.com/apache/
> cloudstack-cloudmonkey/wiki
>
> We encourage all CloudStack users to upgrade to Cloudmonkey 6.3.0 to take
> advantage of the latest features and improvements. As always, we welcome
> feedback and contributions from the community to help make Cloudmonkey even
> better.
>
> Thank you for your continued support of Apache CloudStack Cloudmonkey.
>
>
>
>
>

 



Re: Router VM fails to boot with kernel panic when overprovisioinig is > 1

2023-05-04 Thread Jithin Raju
Hello Sanjay,

What is the hypervisor, version you are using? If its KVM check whether the 
memory ballooning configuration is applied correctly and working as expected 
since you are using over-provisioning.

You could run ‘virsh dumpxml vm-name’ on the KVM as Vivek mentioned and look at 
the below values:


1048576

  524288

You could look at the same using ‘virsh dominfo vm-name’ as well.  I am not 
sure about the status of the ballooning configuration, hence please check that 
in the XML output. [1]

https://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Projects/auto-ballooning


-Jithin

From: Vivek Kumar 
Date: Thursday, 4 May 2023 at 2:09 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Re: Router VM fails to boot with kernel panic when overprovisioinig is 
> 1
Hello Sanjay,

When you are doing over provisioning specially for memory, just go to the KVM 
node and see the output of dumpxml, you will see the memory assigned to the KVM 
guest divided by over provisioning factor, which means no suitable memory for 
OS to run ( if we use default offering ) ,

So try to increase the RAM in default offering or create a larger offering for 
VR.



Vivek Kumar
Sr. Manager - Cloud & DevOps
TechOps | Indiqus Technologies

vivek.ku...@indiqus.com 
www.indiqus.com 





 

> On 02-May-2023, at 1:12 PM, Sanjay Kumar  wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> When overprovisioning factors are > 1, the virtual router vm  is not able
> to boot and ends up in a kernel panic.
>
> ACS_Version: 4.18.0
> Storage: NFS
>
> Any help would be really appreciated. Thank you!
>
> With Regards,
> S Kumar


--
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete the
original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been
obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in error,
please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep
e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are
virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of
viruses.


Re: Router VM fails to boot with kernel panic when overprovisioinig is > 1

2023-05-02 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Sanjay,

This appears like a known issue: 
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7430


-Jithin

From: Sanjay Kumar 
Date: Tuesday, 2 May 2023 at 1:12 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org , 
d...@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Router VM fails to boot with kernel panic when overprovisioinig is > 1
Hi All,

When overprovisioning factors are > 1, the virtual router vm  is not able
to boot and ends up in a kernel panic.

ACS_Version: 4.18.0
Storage: NFS

Any help would be really appreciated. Thank you!

With Regards,
S Kumar

 



Re: Virtual Machines not starting after upgrade to 4.18

2023-05-01 Thread Jithin Raju
Hi Ricardo,

Set the last_host_id in vm_instance table to NULL.

-Jithin

From: Ricardo Pertuz 
Date: Monday, 1 May 2023 at 11:44 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org 
Subject: Virtual Machines not starting after upgrade to 4.18
Hi Community,

As part of upgrading to ACS 4.18 in our sandbox, everything went smoothly and 
we removed some KVM Hyps in the process. Now that we are trying to reboot some 
machines, the management server is giving us this error, like it is looking for 
a downed host, what alternative do I have to avoid this behavior and start the 
machines?

2023-05-01 13:00:04,675 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] 
(API-Job-Executor-2:ctx-4a417809 job-67468 ctx-6607eb32) (logid:a8eb35d8) 
Adding pods to avoid lists for non-explicit VM deployment: []
2023-05-01 13:00:04,675 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] 
(API-Job-Executor-2:ctx-4a417809 job-67468 ctx-6607eb32) (logid:a8eb35d8) 
Adding clusters to avoid lists for non-explicit VM deployment: []
2023-05-01 13:00:04,675 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] 
(API-Job-Executor-2:ctx-4a417809 job-67468 ctx-6607eb32) (logid:a8eb35d8) 
Adding hosts to avoid lists for non-explicit VM deployment: []
2023-05-01 13:00:04,675 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] 
(API-Job-Executor-2:ctx-4a417809 job-67468 ctx-6607eb32) (logid:a8eb35d8) 
DeploymentPlanner allocation algorithm: null
2023-05-01 13:00:04,675 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] 
(API-Job-Executor-2:ctx-4a417809 job-67468 ctx-6607eb32) (logid:a8eb35d8) 
Trying to allocate a host and storage pools from dc:1, pod:null,cluster:null, 
requested cpu: 4800, requested ram: (4.00 GB) 4294967296
2023-05-01 13:00:04,675 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] 
(API-Job-Executor-2:ctx-4a417809 job-67468 ctx-6607eb32) (logid:a8eb35d8) Is 
ROOT volume READY (pool already allocated)?: Yes
2023-05-01 13:00:04,678 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] 
(API-Job-Executor-2:ctx-4a417809 job-67468 ctx-6607eb32) (logid:a8eb35d8) 
Deploy avoids pods: [], clusters: [], hosts: []
2023-05-01 13:00:04,678 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] 
(API-Job-Executor-2:ctx-4a417809 job-67468 ctx-6607eb32) (logid:a8eb35d8) 
Deploy hosts with priorities {} , hosts have NORMAL priority by default
2023-05-01 13:00:04,678 DEBUG [c.c.d.DeploymentPlanningManagerImpl] 
(API-Job-Executor-2:ctx-4a417809 job-67468 ctx-6607eb32) (logid:a8eb35d8) This 
VM has last host_id specified, trying to choose the same host: 9
2023-05-01 13:00:04,682 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiAsyncJobDispatcher] 
(API-Job-Executor-2:ctx-4a417809 job-67468) (logid:a8eb35d8) Unexpected 
exception while executing 
org.apache.cloudstack.api.command.admin.vm.StartVMCmdByAdmin

 



  1   2   >