Re: New PMC member: Slavka Peleva
Congratulations Slavka! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Rene Peinthor Date: Wednesday, 10 April 2024 at 09:13 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: New PMC member: Slavka Peleva :clap: Slavka! Cheers, Rene On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 2:04 PM Suresh Kumar Anaparti < sureshanapa...@apache.org> wrote: > Congratulations Slavka! > > Regards, > Suresh > > On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 4:41 PM Ivet Petrova > wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack > > has invited Slavka Peleva to become a PMC member and we are pleased > > to announce that they have accepted. > > > > Slavka has contributed in the past and has shown effort to make the > > project run smoothly > > > > Please join me in congratulating Slavka! > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Rene Peinthor as committer
Congratulations Rene! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Friday, March 29, 2024 5:11:18 AM To: users ; dev Cc: PMC Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Rene Peinthor as committer devs and users, The PMC have asked Rene Peinthor to become a committer to the Apache CloudStack project and they have accepted. Please join me in congratulating Rene. -- Daan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1
+1 (binding) Downloaded the binary and tested usual operations, no issues found Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Rohit Yadav Date: Thursday, 21 March 2024 at 07:39 To: dev , users Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.4.0 - RC1 Hi All, I've created a v6.4.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and commit SHA: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/commit/df65df7cfe331c5af5d39743717e3d58df921a48 Commit: df65df7cfe331c5af5d39743717e3d58df921a48 GitHub pre-release (contains changelog, artifacts/binaries to test, checksums/usage details): https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/releases/tag/6.4.0 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-6.4.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884) https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open until 27th March, 2024. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason why) Convenience binaries are available from here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/releases/tag/6.4.0 Regards.
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Chair & VP Apache CloudStack Project - Daniel Salvador
Thanks Rohit and congratulations Daniel! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> From: Pearl d'Silva Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2024 6:09:09 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users ; priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Chair & VP Apache CloudStack Project - Daniel Salvador Thanks Rohit for your work. Congratulations Daniel! Regards, Pearl From: Nux Sent: March 21, 2024 4:45 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users ; priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] New PMC Chair & VP Apache CloudStack Project - Daniel Salvador Thanks Rohit for you work this year and congratulations, Daniel!!! On 2024-03-21 13:41, Rohit Yadav wrote: > All, > > It gives me great pleasure to announce that the ASF board has > accepted CloudStack PMC resolution of Daniel Augusto Veronezi Salvador > as > the next PMC Chair / VP of the Apache CloudStack project. > > I would like to thank everyone for the support I've received over the > past > year. > > Please join me in congratulating Daniel, the new CloudStack PMC Chair / > VP. > > Best Regards, > Rohit Yadav
Re: Always getting Expired Token on Vm Console
Hi Ricardo, Can you share the /var/log/cloud.log file on your CPVM when you try to connect to a VM’s console? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Ricardo Pertuz Date: Thursday, 15 February 2024 at 14:35 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Always getting Expired Token on Vm Console Hi all, We are getting Failed to Connect to Server/Access Token Expired after this configuration consoleproxy.url.domain: A public name solving to a Public IP consoleproxy.sslEnabled: False SSL Offloading in the external Load Balancer External Load Balancer pointing to port 80 and 8080 (wss) to the console proxy systemvm Anything Missing? Thanks! BR, Ricardo Pertuz
Re: new committer: Vishesh Jindal (vishesh)
Congratulation Vishesh! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Daan Hoogland Date: Monday, 26 February 2024 at 11:05 To: users , dev Subject: new committer: Vishesh Jindal (vishesh) users and devs, The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has invited Vishesh Jindal to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer enables easier contribution to the project since there is no need to go via the patch submission process. This should enable better productivity. Please join me in congratulating Vishesh. -- on behalf of the PMC, Daan
Re: VMware to KVM Migration tool
Hi Titus, At which point is this error being thrown? At listing the VM instances on the source vCenter, or after triggering a VM migration? Can you share the stack trace of the error from the management server logs? Just for reference, this is the documentation for the migration tool: https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/adminguide/virtual_machines.html#importing-virtual-machines-from-vmware-into-kvm Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Titus Baugus Date: Wednesday, 7 February 2024 at 16:50 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: VMware to KVM Migration tool Hello Community, We have just upgraded to 4.19! we are trying to use the built-in VMWare to KVM migration tool. We are getting this error “Index 0 out of bounds for length 0”. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Titus Baugus Enterprise Systems Engineer, Technology [Answers in Genesis]<https://answersingenesis.org/> [Creation Museum] <https://creationmuseum.org/> [Ark Encounter] <https://arkencounter.com/>
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0
Nice news, thanks Abhishek! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Rohit Yadav Date: Friday, 2 February 2024 at 10:41 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , users Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 Thanks Abhishek and everyone involved in the effort. And congratulations everyone ! Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Friday, February 2, 2024 5:48:54 PM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 Hi all, After more than 72 hours, the vote for CloudStack 4.19.0.0 *passes* with 7 PMC + 3 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) * Daan * Rohit * Nicolas * Nux * Harikrishna * Boris * Wei +1 (non binding) * Vladimir * Pearl * Suresh 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up. Regards, Abhishek
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC4
+1 (binding) Repeated tests performed on previous RCs around Vmware to KVM migration and KVM import/export Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Rohit Yadav Date: Tuesday, 30 January 2024 at 09:37 To: users , d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC4 +1 (binding) Tested 4.19.0.0 RC4 packages with EL8 (Alma Linux) + KVM using mbx. Tested the following: Registered new template Registered ssh public key Created isolated network in VM deploy form Deployed VM as root admin Allow egress rules for isolated network Created PF and FW rules, was able to ssh to instance and wget/ping Internet IPs Created normal user account Register ssh public key Created isolated network in VM deploy form Deployed VM as normal user with ssh key Allow egress rules for isolated network Acquire new public IP and SNAT that to the VM Created FW rules, was able to ssh to instance and wget/ping Internet IPs Found some UI quirks, issues, but none of them are blockers. Reported them here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/8576 Regards. From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 12:28 To: users ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: PMC Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC4 Hi All, I've created a 4.19.0.0 release (RC4), with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.0.0-RC20240129T1021 Commit: 2746225b999612f156e421199e34ef8de98a3664 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.19.0.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 65518106473A09D7AF26B384A70BD2EAA74E2866): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS For testing purposes, I have uploaded the different distro packages to: http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.0.0-RC4/ Since 4.16 the system VM template registration is no longer mandatory before upgrading, however, it can be downloaded from here if needed: https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.19/ The vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Abhishek
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC2
+1 (binding) Tested on Vmware + KVM mixed environment: Vmware to KVM migration functionality, KVM unmanage/manage and VM lifecycle operations on both hypervisors Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Abhishek Kumar Date: Monday, 15 January 2024 at 09:03 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , users Cc: PMC Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.19.0.0 RC2 Hi All, I've created a 4.19.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.19.0.0-RC20240115T1418 Commit: 38bd4fd72bdae354c4b0f615a4861fc84d67b29a Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.19.0.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 65518106473A09D7AF26B384A70BD2EAA74E2866): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS For testing purposes, I have uploaded the different distro packages to: http://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.0.0-RC2/ Since 4.16 the system VM template registration is no longer mandatory before upgrading, however, it can be downloaded from here if needed: https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.19/ The vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Abhishek
Re: new PMC member Harikrishna Patnala
Congratulations Hari! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Daan Hoogland Date: Monday, 15 January 2024 at 06:25 To: dev , users Subject: new PMC member Harikrishna Patnala users and dev, The PMC have invited Harikrishna to join their ranks and he has gracefully accepted. Please join me in congratulating Hari. -- Daan
Re: Urgent - Cannot manage shared IP addresses in advanced zone
Hi Fariborz, Sorry if misunderstanding but I think you may want to create a new Shared network on the Networks section (not entering through the Zone and Physical network), and define the IP range on the network creation. Once created you can navigate to Networks -> Shared network -> IP ranges (at least this is the behavior on latest versions, haven’t checked on 4.15) Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Fariborz Navidan Date: Thursday, 11 January 2024 at 15:11 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Urgent - Cannot manage shared IP addresses in advanced zone Hi. I have now successfully managed to add the new IP range using the old UI at Infrastructure -> Zone -> Physical Network -> Guest -> Network -> View IP ranges. However, in the new UI, there is nowhere to manage shared guest network IP ranges. I don't have public traffic type setup. All VMs are accessing the internet through guest network IPs which are routed to the bridge cloudbr0 which has public internet access. I've already checked Infrastructure -> Zone -> Physical Network -> Traffic Types -> Guest in the new UI. I'm using advanced zone with security groups enabled. Thanks. On Thu, 11 Jan 2024, 19:30 Pearl d'Silva, wrote: > Hi, > > Can you go to Zone -> Physical Network -> Traffic Types -> Public and > check if the IP ranges added are visible there. > > Thanks, > Pearl > > From: Wei ZHOU > Sent: January 11, 2024 10:53 AM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Urgent - Cannot manage shared IP addresses in advanced zone > > Do you use old or new UI ? > > Do you use an advanced zone with or without security groups ? > > On Thu, 11 Jan 2024 at 16:40, Fariborz Navidan > wrote: > > > Hello Friends, > > > > I have a very urgent problem with adding new shared IP address range > (CIDR) > > in a advanced zone. We are running 4.15.0.0 and I had configured multiple > > shared IP address CIDRs in previous version 4.14. In 4.14, we could > manage > > IP ranges by going to Zone -> Physical Network -> Guest -> IP ranges. > > However, in 4.15.0.0 I cannot find anywhere to manage my shared IP > > addresses. Previously added shared IP ranges are available to guest VMs > but > > I cannot manage them anywhere in the UI. I've tried going to > > Infrastructure -> Zone -> Physical Network -> Traffic Types -> Guest but > > could noty find existing IP ranges as well as Add IP range. > > > > Please advise me as soon as possible. > > Thanks in advance. > > > > Regards. > > > > > >
Re: New committer: Alexandre Mattioli
Congratulations Alex! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Nux Date: Wednesday, 10 January 2024 at 19:28 To: Dev , Users Subject: New committer: Alexandre Mattioli All, The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has invited Alexandre Mattioli to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Alex has been instrumental in many features present today in Cloudstack, with a focus on networking and VMWare: - IPv6 static routing - Edge Zones - Autoscaling with VR - VNF appliances - VMWare NSX support - Tungsten Fabric / OpenSDN - Backup & recovery framework - VLAN trunking and security policies in ESX and so on. Please join me in congratulating Alex!
Re: new committer: João Jandre Paraquetti
Congratulations Joao! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Monday, December 18, 2023 9:46:48 AM To: dev ; users Subject: new committer: João Jandre Paraquetti community, The PMC have invited João Jandre Paraquetti to join the project as a committer and the invitation was gratefully accepted. Please join me in welcoming João. Congratulations João, -- Daan
Re: new committer Vladimir Petrov
Congratulations Vladi! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Abhishek Kumar Date: Tuesday, 12 December 2023 at 08:08 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: new committer Vladimir Petrov Congrats Vladi! On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 15:22, Daan Hoogland wrote: > community, > > The PMC has decided Vladi to become a committer and he has gracefully > accepted. Please join me in welcoming Vladi to the project as > committer. > Congratulations Vladi > > -- > Daan >
Re: [VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum
+1 (binding) Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Rohit Yadav Date: Monday, 4 December 2023 at 05:01 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Adopt Github Discusssions as Users Forum All, Following the discussion thread on adopting Github Discussions as users forum [1], I put the following proposal for a vote: 1. Adopt and use Github Discussions as user forums. 2. The Github Discussions feature is tied with the users@cloudstack.apache.org mailing list (PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8274). 3. Any project governance and decision-making thread such as voting, releases etc. should continue to use the project mailing lists. Vote will be open for 120 hours (by Friday, 8th Dec). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hs0295hw9rnmhoh9l2qo5hc4b62hhvk8 Regards.
Re: new committer Bryan Lima
Congratulations Bryan! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2023 9:33:56 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: new committer Bryan Lima Congratulations Bryan on becoming a committer! Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2023 16:37 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: new committer Bryan Lima excuse me everybody, and mostly Bryan, for my C technology applied. We have invited Bryan to become a committer and not to the PMC (yet) On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 10:11 AM Jimmy Huybrechts wrote: > > Congratulations Bryan! > > -- > Jimmy > > Van: Daan Hoogland > Datum: donderdag, 30 november 2023 om 10:07 > Aan: dev , users > CC: PMC > Onderwerp: new committer Bryan Lima > All, > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack > has invited Bryan Lima to become a PMC member and we are pleased > to announce that they have accepted. > > Bryan has contributed himself and assisted in reviewing and testing > the work of others. He has shown to be responsive, constructive and > pleasant to work with. > > please join me in congratulating Bryan > > -- > Daan -- Daan
Re: new PMC member: Abhishek Kumar
Well done Abhishek, congratulations! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Jithin Raju Date: Monday, 27 November 2023 at 01:21 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , users Subject: Re: new PMC member: Abhishek Kumar Congratulations Abhishek. -Jithin From: Daan Hoogland Date: Thursday, 23 November 2023 at 2:11 PM To: users , dev Subject: new PMC member: Abhishek Kumar The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has invited Abhishek Kumar to become a PMC member and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Abhishek has contributed in the past and has shown effort to make the project run smoothly. He is also the Release Manager for the upcoming 4.19 release. please join me in congratulating Abhishek -- Daan
Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache CloudStack LTS Maintenance Release 4.18.1.0
Great, thanks Wei! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez On 15/9/23, 11:18, "Sina Kashipazha" wrote: Congrats! Well done Wei! -- - Original Message --- On Friday, September 15th, 2023 at 3:56 PM, Nux mailto:n...@li.nux.ro>> wrote: > > > That's amazing! Thanks, Wei! > > > > On 2023-09-15 14:44, Wei ZHOU wrote: > > > The Apache CloudStack project is pleased to announce the release of > > CloudStack 4.18.1.0. > > > > The CloudStack 4.18.1.0 release is a maintenance release as part of > > its 4.18.x LTS branch and contains around 200 fixes and > > improvements since the CloudStack 4.18.0.0 release. Some of the > > highlights include: > > > > - Support Managed User Data in AutoScale VM groups > > - Support CKS (CloudStack Kubernetes Cluster) in VPC tiers > > - Support for VMware 8.0.0.x > > - Several Hypervisor (VMware, KVM, XenServer) fixes and improvements > > - Several UI fixes and improvements > > - Several Network (L2, VXLAN, etc) fixes and improvements > > - Several System VM (CPVM, SSVM) fixes and improvements > > - Improve Solidfire storage plugin integration on VMware > > - Support volume migration in ScaleIO/PowerFlex within and across > > ScaleIO/PowerFlex storage clusters > > - Volume encryption support for StorPool > > - Fix CloudStack upgrade with some MySQL versions > > - Fix guest OSes and guest OS mappings in CloudStack database > > > > CloudStack LTS branches are supported for 18 months and will receive > > updates for the first 12 months and only security updates in the last > > 6 months. > > > > Apache CloudStack is an integrated Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) > > software platform that allows users to build feature-rich public and > > private cloud environments. CloudStack includes an intuitive user > > interface and rich API for managing the compute, networking, software, > > and storage resources. The project became an Apache top-level project > > in March, 2013. > > > > More information about Apache CloudStack can be found at: > > https://cloudstack.apache.org/ > > > > # Documentation > > > > What's new in CloudStack 4.18.1.0: > > https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.18.1.0/releasenotes/about.html > > > > The 4.18.1.0 release notes include a full list of issues fixed, as > > well as upgrade instructions from previous versions of Apache > > CloudStack, and can be found at: > > https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.18.1.0/releasenotes/ > > > > The official installation, administration, and API documentation for > > each of the releases are available on our documentation page: > > https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/ > > > > # Downloads > > > > The official source code for the 4.18.1.0 release can be downloaded > > from our downloads page: > > https://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html > > > > In addition to the official source code release, individual > > contributors have also made convenience binaries available on the > > Apache CloudStack download page, and can be found at: > > > > https://download.cloudstack.org/el/7/ > > https://download.cloudstack.org/el/8/ > > https://download.cloudstack.org/ubuntu/dists/ > > https://www.shapeblue.com/packages/
GSOC 2023 Results
Hi all, I’m happy to share with the community that our participation at the Google Summer of Code 2023 is finished with one successful project [1]. Please join me congratulating Ayush for his great work on extending the Import/Export Instances functionality to KVM [2]. Looking forward to seeing you around in the community! [1] https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/programs/2023/projects/f0gpheQM [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7712 Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC3)
+1 (binding) Based on previous testing and more VM and volume related operations on Vmware 7.0 Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Wei ZHOU Date: Thursday, 7 September 2023 at 05:34 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , users Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC3) Hi all, I've created a 4.18.1.0-RC3, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.18.1.0-RC20230907T0850 Commit: 4bdff06acd3630180f85ffe2f54add972607bbb4 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the following location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.18.1.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 1503DFE7C8226103): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2)
+1 (binding) Tested VM operations from deploy-as-is templates on VMware 7.0, import/export instances and general VM and volumes operations for different roles Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Nux Date: Tuesday, 5 September 2023 at 10:37 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.18.1.0 (RC2) +1 (binding) from me based on network and storage related tests with both Advanced Zones (with KVM, Xen and VMware) as well as tests on Security Groups zones with KVM on EL8. Regards On 2023-09-05 13:23, Wei ZHOU wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Tested the upgrade from 4.16.1, 4.17.2 and 4.18.0, checked guest OS > mappings > Manually tested vm operations with various OSes: rocky8, alma8, > ubuntu22, > vmware8.0c > Kicked smoke tests with various OSes: centos7, rocky8, ubuntu22, > vmware70u3, vmware80. All look ok, except 2 test failures with CKS > which we > have seen in some PRs. > > -Wei > > On Fri, 1 Sept 2023 at 09:39, Wei ZHOU wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I've created a 4.18.1.0-RC2, with the following artifacts up for a >> vote: >> >> Git Branch and Commit SH: >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commits/4.18.1.0-RC20230901T0817 >> Commit: 0e7f7d42f0ec68a360fafa7de21ea06577ed032c >> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the >> following >> location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.18.1.0/ >> >> PGP release keys (signed using 1503DFE7C8226103): >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours. >> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>
Re: [DISCUSS] New Design for the Apache CloudStack Website
Looks great Ivet! Looking forward to seeing it in action! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Nux Date: Friday, 1 September 2023 at 11:01 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Giles Sirett , d...@cloudstack.apache.org , Marketing Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] New Design for the Apache CloudStack Website Hi Ivet, Looks nice and trendy, thanks for the effort! Regards On 2023-08-30 14:34, Ivet Petrova wrote: > Hi All, > > I uploaded the design here: > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pef7xWWMPYAA5UkbS_XMUxrz53KB7J5t/view?usp=sharing > > > Kind regards, > > > > > On 30 Aug 2023, at 16:31, Giles Sirett > mailto:giles.sir...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: > > Hi Ivet – thanks for pushing forward with this – excited to review a > new design. > > On that note, I cant see a link in your mail ☹ > > Kind Regards > Giles > > > Giles Sirett > CEO > giles.sir...@shapeblue.com<mailto:giles.sir...@shapeblue.com> > www.shapeblue.com<http://www.shapeblue.com/> > > > > > From: Ivet Petrova > mailto:ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com>> > Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2023 10:14 AM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>; > Marketing mailto:market...@shapeblue.com>> > Cc: dev mailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org>> > Subject: [DISCUSS] New Design for the Apache CloudStack Website > > Hello, > > I would like to start a discussion on the design of the Apache > CloudStack Website and to propose a new design for it. > > As we all know, the website has not been changed for years in terms of > design and information. The biggest issue we know we have is that the > website is not showing the full potential of CloudStack. In addition to > it during discussions with many community members, I have noted the > following issues: > - the existing website design is old-school > - the current homepage does not collect enough information to show > CloudStack's strengths > - current website design is missing images from the ACS UI and cannot > create a feel for the product in the users > - the website has issues on a mobile device > - we lack any graphic and diagrams > - some important information like how to download is not very visible > > I collected a lot of feedback during last months and want to propose a > new up to date design for the website, which is attached below. The new > design will bring: > - improved UX > - look and feel corresponding to the CloudStack's capabilities and > strengths > - more graphical elements, diagrams > - better branding > - more important information, easily accessible for the potential users > > I hope you will like the new design – all feedback welcome. Once we > have the design finalised, we will use Rohit’s proposal previously of a > CMS, which is easy to edit. > > [cid:B5517475-02DA-472A-BD1D-F3B600AD28ED] > > Kind regards,
Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates
Hi Will, Afaik the deleteTemplate API removes the template in CloudStack (database entries) but does not remove the template files on storage. My statement was a concern about replacing the template files which can be used as a base image when using thin deployment on VMs, which can affect the running VMs. About the template versions, I think currently the only way to achieve this is to register a new template for a newer version. About the prepareTemplate API, I don’t think that will achieve the goal but could require some testing Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Will Conrad Date: Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 15:58 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates Can you elaborate on this statement? "but only if there aren’t VMs using the template as the backing file on that primary storage pool." The documentation here states that deleting a template does not affect any VMs using the template. https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.18/apis/deleteTemplate.html Does cloudstack have a recommended best practice for managing templates/versions? Say, for instance, If we want to ensure we have the latest cloud image every two weeks for an ubuntu2204 template? Would manually deleting the cached file from primary storage and running the prepareTemplate API call on the template do what I seek?Would it be safe? prepareTemplate API documented here: https://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.18/apis/prepareTemplate.html On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 10:51 AM Nicolas Vazquez < nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Hi Will, > > You can refer to the Github repository > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack and submit a PR for this, or can > also raise an issue and describe this functionality as a new > feature/improvement: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/new. > > The only problem I see with your approach is that only updating secondary > storage will not ensure that new dpeloyments will get the latest version, > since CloudStack keeps copies of the template on primary storage also. New > deployments use the cached templates on primary storage when it is > available to avoid copying from secondary storage. I think that the feature > should remove all the existing copies in primary storage also and replace > them with the latest version, but only if there aren’t VMs using the > template as the backing file on that primary storage pool. > > Regards, > Nicolas Vazquez > > > From: Will Conrad > Date: Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 08:46 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates > Hi Nicolas, > > Where do we stand on this? Is this something that could be easily updated > or feature added? I'm not familiar with the code base. If I were to explore > the idea of making an update and submitting a PR, where would I start? > > Regards, > > Willard > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:41 AM Will Conrad > wrote: > > > Nicolas, > > > > "In your requirement do you mean to change the template URL and > > re-download the template from a different location or simply download > again > > the template from the same URL after updating the served file?" > > > > For our use case the URL will stay the same, but the file will be updated > > (though I could imagine other use cases where an update of the URL would > be > > useful too). Consider a URL like > > http://some.distro.com/cloud/latest/imgname.img > > where /latest/ automatically takes you to the latest updated version of > > that file over time. We would not be looking to trigger an update on all > of > > the primary storage pools where instances have been deployed, just the > > secondary storage such that new deploys use the updated image. > > > > Over time, distro cloud images get updated with the latest updates (that > > one would receive just by running apt update && apt upgrade, for > instance). > > If we continue to deploy with the same image, updates will cause vm > > deployment to take longer and longer over time, as well as consume more > and > > more network bandwidth, due to the updates each vm will have to perform > at > > time of deployment. > > > > "Afaik there is no supported way to safely do this except manually > > updating the files on the downloaded storage pools (secondary and > primary) > > which should be updated carefully. The tables template_store_ref and > > template_spool_ref indicate the downloaded copies on secondary and > primary > > pools of each template." > > > > I assume you're referring to the question about copying over/updating the > > secondary storage
Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates
Hi Will, You can refer to the Github repository https://github.com/apache/cloudstack and submit a PR for this, or can also raise an issue and describe this functionality as a new feature/improvement: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/new. The only problem I see with your approach is that only updating secondary storage will not ensure that new dpeloyments will get the latest version, since CloudStack keeps copies of the template on primary storage also. New deployments use the cached templates on primary storage when it is available to avoid copying from secondary storage. I think that the feature should remove all the existing copies in primary storage also and replace them with the latest version, but only if there aren’t VMs using the template as the backing file on that primary storage pool. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Will Conrad Date: Tuesday, 20 June 2023 at 08:46 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates Hi Nicolas, Where do we stand on this? Is this something that could be easily updated or feature added? I'm not familiar with the code base. If I were to explore the idea of making an update and submitting a PR, where would I start? Regards, Willard On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:41 AM Will Conrad wrote: > Nicolas, > > "In your requirement do you mean to change the template URL and > re-download the template from a different location or simply download again > the template from the same URL after updating the served file?" > > For our use case the URL will stay the same, but the file will be updated > (though I could imagine other use cases where an update of the URL would be > useful too). Consider a URL like > http://some.distro.com/cloud/latest/imgname.img > where /latest/ automatically takes you to the latest updated version of > that file over time. We would not be looking to trigger an update on all of > the primary storage pools where instances have been deployed, just the > secondary storage such that new deploys use the updated image. > > Over time, distro cloud images get updated with the latest updates (that > one would receive just by running apt update && apt upgrade, for instance). > If we continue to deploy with the same image, updates will cause vm > deployment to take longer and longer over time, as well as consume more and > more network bandwidth, due to the updates each vm will have to perform at > time of deployment. > > "Afaik there is no supported way to safely do this except manually > updating the files on the downloaded storage pools (secondary and primary) > which should be updated carefully. The tables template_store_ref and > template_spool_ref indicate the downloaded copies on secondary and primary > pools of each template." > > I assume you're referring to the question about copying over/updating the > secondary storage image manually. I consider this idea a hack that could > cause issues or at the very least be at risk of breaking when a new > cloudstack update gets deployed. I don't like the idea myself. I'm just > trying to explore all the options available to us and see where your > guidance takes me. > > The reality is that we can make direct download work, but to do so would > require additional infrastructure (for instance, a webserver in each zone > where we point the URL to, that we now have to maintain and monitor). > Ideally we would just like to let the secondary storage server(s) fulfill > their role. > > On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 10:30 PM Nicolas Vazquez < > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > >> Hi Will, >> >> When registering a template CloudStack usually downloads it first to >> secondary storage and then copies it through the different primary storage >> pools when a VM deployment requires it. The aim of the direct download >> feature is to skip the first step and directly downloading the templates >> into primary storage pools without any secondary storage intervention. >> >> In your requirement do you mean to change the template URL and >> re-download the template from a different location or simply download again >> the template from the same URL after updating the served file? Afaik there >> is no supported way to safely do this except manually updating the files on >> the downloaded storage pools (secondary and primary) which should be >> updated carefully. The tables template_store_ref and template_spool_ref >> indicate the downloaded copies on secondary and primary pools of each >> template. >> >> Regards, >> Nicolas Vazquez >> >> >> From: Will Conrad >> Date: Thursday, 15 June 2023 at 14:47 >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org >> Su
Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates
Hi Will, When registering a template CloudStack usually downloads it first to secondary storage and then copies it through the different primary storage pools when a VM deployment requires it. The aim of the direct download feature is to skip the first step and directly downloading the templates into primary storage pools without any secondary storage intervention. In your requirement do you mean to change the template URL and re-download the template from a different location or simply download again the template from the same URL after updating the served file? Afaik there is no supported way to safely do this except manually updating the files on the downloaded storage pools (secondary and primary) which should be updated carefully. The tables template_store_ref and template_spool_ref indicate the downloaded copies on secondary and primary pools of each template. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Will Conrad Date: Thursday, 15 June 2023 at 14:47 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates Nicolas, The reason we're considering using the directdownload feature is to simplify template maintenance/updates. I presume that's what it was designed for. We want to be able to, preferably through cloudstack functionality, update the template image file associated with a template. We planned on achieving this utilizing directdownload to decouple the image file from the registered template itself when it occurred to us that a "regrab" button in the template properties webui or an API call to tell secondary storage to redownload the source would very much simplify this process. This brings my questions to: How difficult would it be to implement something like that? Is there another way to update the imagefile associated with a template? I mean, could we manually overwrite the file on secondary storage? Would that break anything? What is Cloudstack's recommended best practice for managing template images? Regards, Willard (Will) On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:26 AM Nicolas Vazquez < nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > No problem, I think these docs do not clearly state the supported storage > providers, I will fix that. On this blog entry we have mentioned them: > https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-feature-first-look-direct-download-agnostic-of-the-storage-provider/ > > Currently the direct download feature is supported on NFS, local storage > and shared mount point, but not for Ceph. > > Regards, > Nicolas Vazquez > > > From: Will Conrad > Date: Wednesday, 14 June 2023 at 10:58 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates > Nicolas, > > I feel silly for not having read that documentation all the way through. > Thank you for your assistance. > > I have another question, now. Since we've been working with this we > have been trying various methods of testing directdownload templates. Since > we were having problems with HTTPS, we tested HTTP. We have run into a > problem where the template fails to download if the guest is using ceph > storage. When we change to creating the VM on "local" storage, the template > download succeeds and the VM creates successfully. Are there any insights > you can provide here? Is there more documentation I may have missed? > > On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 9:39 AM Nicolas Vazquez < > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > > Thanks Will, > > > > Currently it is only possible to upload the certificate via API but not > > from the UI, please find it documented here: > > > https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/adminguide/templates.html#bypassing-secondary-storage-for-kvm-templates > > . > > > > In your case as the template is stored on Github you may want to upload a > > Github certificate to the hosts for the download to be trusted > > > > Regards, > > Nicolas Vazquez > > > > > > From: Will Conrad > > Date: Wednesday, 14 June 2023 at 10:06 > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for > templates > > Hi Wei and Nicolas, > > > > Thank you for you responses. > > > > Wei, > > > > I checked the host, and confirmed that yes the ca-certificates package is > > installed and latest. > > "root@lax2-cs-hv01:~# apt list ca-certificates -a > > > > Listing... Done > > > > ca-certificates/jammy-updates,jammy-security,now 20230311ubuntu0.22.04.1 > > all [installed,automatic] > > > > ca-certificates/jammy 20211016 all > > > > > > > > Nicolas, > > > > "Have you tried uploading the required certificate for the h
Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates
No problem, I think these docs do not clearly state the supported storage providers, I will fix that. On this blog entry we have mentioned them: https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-feature-first-look-direct-download-agnostic-of-the-storage-provider/ Currently the direct download feature is supported on NFS, local storage and shared mount point, but not for Ceph. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Will Conrad Date: Wednesday, 14 June 2023 at 10:58 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates Nicolas, I feel silly for not having read that documentation all the way through. Thank you for your assistance. I have another question, now. Since we've been working with this we have been trying various methods of testing directdownload templates. Since we were having problems with HTTPS, we tested HTTP. We have run into a problem where the template fails to download if the guest is using ceph storage. When we change to creating the VM on "local" storage, the template download succeeds and the VM creates successfully. Are there any insights you can provide here? Is there more documentation I may have missed? On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 9:39 AM Nicolas Vazquez < nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Thanks Will, > > Currently it is only possible to upload the certificate via API but not > from the UI, please find it documented here: > https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/adminguide/templates.html#bypassing-secondary-storage-for-kvm-templates > . > > In your case as the template is stored on Github you may want to upload a > Github certificate to the hosts for the download to be trusted > > Regards, > Nicolas Vazquez > > > From: Will Conrad > Date: Wednesday, 14 June 2023 at 10:06 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates > Hi Wei and Nicolas, > > Thank you for you responses. > > Wei, > > I checked the host, and confirmed that yes the ca-certificates package is > installed and latest. > "root@lax2-cs-hv01:~# apt list ca-certificates -a > > Listing... Done > > ca-certificates/jammy-updates,jammy-security,now 20230311ubuntu0.22.04.1 > all [installed,automatic] > > ca-certificates/jammy 20211016 all > > > > Nicolas, > > "Have you tried uploading the required certificate for the https download > via the uploadTemplateDirectDownloadCertificate API?" > > No I have not. I was unaware of the need to do this. Is there documentation > I may have missed? What certificate is supposed to be uploaded and how is > it used? > > Regards, > > Willard > > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 10:01 PM Nicolas Vazquez < > nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > > > Hi Will, > > > > Have you tried uploading the required certificate for the https download > > via the uploadTemplateDirectDownloadCertificate API? > > > > Regards, > > Nicolas Vazquez > > > > > > From: Wei ZHOU > > Date: Tuesday, 13 June 2023 at 20:01 > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for > templates > > Hi Will, > > > > What hypervisor do you use ? Have you installed ca-crrtificates package? > > > > -Wei > > > > On Tuesday, 13 June 2023, Will Conrad > > wrote: > > > > > Hello again, Community! > > > > > > We're trying to make use of DirectDownload templates which makes use of > > the > > > "Bypass Secondary Storage" feature, but we seem to be having issues > with > > > this functionality. > > > > > > After setting up a new template with "Direct Download" turned on and an > > > HTTPS URL our template file won't download. The download source is a > file > > > stored in github. This is what we see in the logs: > > > > > > Jun 13 16:12:07 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: WARN > > > [kvm.storage.KVMStorageProcessor] (agentRequest-Handler-5:) > > > (logid:7b08521c) Error downloading template 209 due to: Error on HTTPS > > > request: PKIX path building failed: > > > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to > > > find valid certification path to requested target > > > Jun 13 16:12:07 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: INFO > > > [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-1:) > > > (logid:7b08521c) Trying to fetch storage pool > > > 3b59a095-9e71-3e97-92a8-56aa3f931a5e from libvirt > > > Jun 13 16:12:07 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: WARN > > > [kvm.storage.KVMStorageProcesso
Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates
Thanks Will, Currently it is only possible to upload the certificate via API but not from the UI, please find it documented here: https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/adminguide/templates.html#bypassing-secondary-storage-for-kvm-templates. In your case as the template is stored on Github you may want to upload a Github certificate to the hosts for the download to be trusted Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Will Conrad Date: Wednesday, 14 June 2023 at 10:06 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates Hi Wei and Nicolas, Thank you for you responses. Wei, I checked the host, and confirmed that yes the ca-certificates package is installed and latest. "root@lax2-cs-hv01:~# apt list ca-certificates -a Listing... Done ca-certificates/jammy-updates,jammy-security,now 20230311ubuntu0.22.04.1 all [installed,automatic] ca-certificates/jammy 20211016 all Nicolas, "Have you tried uploading the required certificate for the https download via the uploadTemplateDirectDownloadCertificate API?" No I have not. I was unaware of the need to do this. Is there documentation I may have missed? What certificate is supposed to be uploaded and how is it used? Regards, Willard On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 10:01 PM Nicolas Vazquez < nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > Hi Will, > > Have you tried uploading the required certificate for the https download > via the uploadTemplateDirectDownloadCertificate API? > > Regards, > Nicolas Vazquez > > > From: Wei ZHOU > Date: Tuesday, 13 June 2023 at 20:01 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates > Hi Will, > > What hypervisor do you use ? Have you installed ca-crrtificates package? > > -Wei > > On Tuesday, 13 June 2023, Will Conrad > wrote: > > > Hello again, Community! > > > > We're trying to make use of DirectDownload templates which makes use of > the > > "Bypass Secondary Storage" feature, but we seem to be having issues with > > this functionality. > > > > After setting up a new template with "Direct Download" turned on and an > > HTTPS URL our template file won't download. The download source is a file > > stored in github. This is what we see in the logs: > > > > Jun 13 16:12:07 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: WARN > > [kvm.storage.KVMStorageProcessor] (agentRequest-Handler-5:) > > (logid:7b08521c) Error downloading template 209 due to: Error on HTTPS > > request: PKIX path building failed: > > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to > > find valid certification path to requested target > > Jun 13 16:12:07 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: INFO > > [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-1:) > > (logid:7b08521c) Trying to fetch storage pool > > 3b59a095-9e71-3e97-92a8-56aa3f931a5e from libvirt > > Jun 13 16:12:07 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: WARN > > [kvm.storage.KVMStorageProcessor] (agentRequest-Handler-1:) > > (logid:7b08521c) Error downloading template 209 due to: Error on HTTPS > > request: PKIX path building failed: > > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to > > find valid certification path to requested target > > Jun 13 16:12:07 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: INFO > > [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-4:) > > (logid:78a6fa93) Trying to fetch storage pool > > 3b59a095-9e71-3e97-92a8-56aa3f931a5e from libvirt > > Jun 13 16:12:07 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: INFO > > [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-4:) > > (logid:78a6fa93) Asking libvirt to refresh storage pool > > 3b59a095-9e71-3e97-92a8-56aa3f931a5e > > Jun 13 16:12:07 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: INFO > > [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-2:) > > (logid:7b08521c) Trying to fetch storage pool > > 3b59a095-9e71-3e97-92a8-56aa3f931a5e from libvirt > > Jun 13 16:12:08 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: INFO > > [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:) > > (logid:78a6fa93) Trying to fetch storage pool > > eb9f16ef-3ba3-4c50-9e64-807b6f2c8994 from libvirt > > Jun 13 16:12:08 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: INFO > > [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:) > > (logid:78a6fa93) Asking libvirt to refresh storage pool > > eb9f16ef-3ba3-4c50-9e64-807b6f2c8994 > > Jun 13 16:12:08 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: WARN > > [kvm.storage.KVMStorageProcessor] (agentRequest-Handler-2:) > > (logid:7b08521c) Error downloading template 209 due to: Error on HTTPS > > request: PKIX path building failed: > > sun.security.provi
Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates
Hi Will, Have you tried uploading the required certificate for the https download via the uploadTemplateDirectDownloadCertificate API? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Wei ZHOU Date: Tuesday, 13 June 2023 at 20:01 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Direct Download/Bypass Secondary Storage option for templates Hi Will, What hypervisor do you use ? Have you installed ca-crrtificates package? -Wei On Tuesday, 13 June 2023, Will Conrad wrote: > Hello again, Community! > > We're trying to make use of DirectDownload templates which makes use of the > "Bypass Secondary Storage" feature, but we seem to be having issues with > this functionality. > > After setting up a new template with "Direct Download" turned on and an > HTTPS URL our template file won't download. The download source is a file > stored in github. This is what we see in the logs: > > Jun 13 16:12:07 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: WARN > [kvm.storage.KVMStorageProcessor] (agentRequest-Handler-5:) > (logid:7b08521c) Error downloading template 209 due to: Error on HTTPS > request: PKIX path building failed: > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to > find valid certification path to requested target > Jun 13 16:12:07 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: INFO > [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-1:) > (logid:7b08521c) Trying to fetch storage pool > 3b59a095-9e71-3e97-92a8-56aa3f931a5e from libvirt > Jun 13 16:12:07 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: WARN > [kvm.storage.KVMStorageProcessor] (agentRequest-Handler-1:) > (logid:7b08521c) Error downloading template 209 due to: Error on HTTPS > request: PKIX path building failed: > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to > find valid certification path to requested target > Jun 13 16:12:07 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: INFO > [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-4:) > (logid:78a6fa93) Trying to fetch storage pool > 3b59a095-9e71-3e97-92a8-56aa3f931a5e from libvirt > Jun 13 16:12:07 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: INFO > [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-4:) > (logid:78a6fa93) Asking libvirt to refresh storage pool > 3b59a095-9e71-3e97-92a8-56aa3f931a5e > Jun 13 16:12:07 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: INFO > [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-2:) > (logid:7b08521c) Trying to fetch storage pool > 3b59a095-9e71-3e97-92a8-56aa3f931a5e from libvirt > Jun 13 16:12:08 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: INFO > [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:) > (logid:78a6fa93) Trying to fetch storage pool > eb9f16ef-3ba3-4c50-9e64-807b6f2c8994 from libvirt > Jun 13 16:12:08 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: INFO > [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:) > (logid:78a6fa93) Asking libvirt to refresh storage pool > eb9f16ef-3ba3-4c50-9e64-807b6f2c8994 > Jun 13 16:12:08 lax2-cs-hv01 java[26054]: WARN > [kvm.storage.KVMStorageProcessor] (agentRequest-Handler-2:) > (logid:7b08521c) Error downloading template 209 due to: Error on HTTPS > request: PKIX path building failed: > sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to > find valid certification path to requested target > > We've been through this documentation: > https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/adminguide/hosts.html#<https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/adminguide/hosts.html> > securing-process > > but everything seems to be in order, on our side. Any insights here? > Happy to provide any logs or configuration information to assist. > > Regards, > > Willard Conrad > > DevOps Engineer > > Hivelocity, LLC >
Re: [VOTE] CloudStack Project Blog Migration
+1 (binding) Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Rohit Yadav Date: Wednesday, 17 May 2023 at 05:58 To: dev Cc: users Subject: [VOTE] CloudStack Project Blog Migration All, The ASF-infra had announced a hard deadline [0][1] to decommission our project’s Roller based blog [3] on the 31st May 2023. For the blog migration, ASF-infra has exported CloudStack blog posts from the current Roller’s database-backed infra to markdown files. These were put together in cloudstack-www repository’s docusauras-staging branch [2] with Docusauras used as a static-site-generator and a GitHub Actions workflow to automate publishing a staging site for your testing and review [4]. The staging site that migrates both the website and blog isn’t completely ready to meet the hard deadline, so this vote is proposed for only migrating the blog before the deadline and continue efforts to migrate to a new website [2][4] when we're ready in the near future. The following is put for voting: 1. By the end of 31st May ’23, ASF-infra will decommission the project blog at https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack and for now we proceed with only the blog migration before this deadline. 2. The old blog URL/pages from https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/<https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/%3cblog-permalink%3e> will be redirected to https://cloudstack.apache.org/blog/<https://cloudstack.apache.org/blog/%3cblog-permalink%3e>. This will be done by the ASF-infra. 3. The blog content is copied to the "content/blog" directory of the asf-site branch in the https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www repository [6], published at https://cloudstack.apache.org/blog/. The vote will be open until we reach a lazy consensus. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason why) [0] https://markmail.org/message/o5pse33cgriebsrg [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/hfhzochhmqhd32tclgc47d5nk90jxmb2 [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/tree/docusaurus-staging/blog [3] https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/ [4] https://cloudstack.staged.apache.org/ [5] https://cloudstack.apache.org/bylaws.html [6] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-www/commit/651ec3ad9a3f524a5ce1bb9d6943856f57e638e3 Regards.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.3.0 - RC1
+1 (binding) Packages built from source tag: 6.3.0, tested different APIs and autocompletion fixes for this milestone Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Daan Hoogland Date: Wednesday, 3 May 2023 at 07:06 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.3.0 - RC1 +1 (binding), monkey tested (no pun intended) connected to different local and remote envs bot by restarting and set profile commands. tried different commands and command completions Also trusting on Rohit's due diligence On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 11:32 AM Rohit Yadav wrote: > +1 (binding) > > The tarball/source and signatures are okay: > > # gpg --verify apache-cloudstack-cloudmonkey-6.3.0-src.tar.bz2.asc > gpg: assuming signed data in > 'apache-cloudstack-cloudmonkey-6.3.0-src.tar.bz2' > gpg: Signature made Mon May 1 19:36:51 2023 IST > gpg:using RSA key 4A64E2F46BBC136DD92D71FB5B7DEFE0508A4AD8 > gpg: Good signature from "Boris Stoyanov " [unknown] > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! > gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the > owner. > Primary key fingerprint: 4A64 E2F4 6BBC 136D D92D 71FB 5B7D EFE0 508A 4AD8 > > I was able to build cmk from the tarball source code and also tested the > uploaded community/convinience binaries and checksum - LGTM. > > I also checked the md5 checksum for the binaries on the Github > pre-release, they match the description on the pre-release: > > > md5 cmk.* > MD5 (cmk.darwin.arm64) = 1e9768e47350da347e5dae9c84db60e7 > MD5 (cmk.darwin.x86-64) = 132b6e32bf24f5c4472c7db31a12c4b9 > MD5 (cmk.linux.arm32) = fc881649ff02c91eb28f0a83229125f2 > MD5 (cmk.linux.arm64) = 8dfc3b284ee12b7c2564b9cf1bb47cb8 > MD5 (cmk.linux.x86) = 6f0a0776fdd0acd010f919413937c33c > MD5 (cmk.linux.x86-64) = 85616fd8c48648b353065878f78ae7d4 > MD5 (cmk.windows.x86-64.exe) = e0f726ce7ce518275dc4f8cad8e8bad3 > MD5 (cmk.windows.x86.exe) = b7e7109f6ab8c9899bb0c0635bd66a1c > > The version/build ID checks OK: > > On Mac OSX arm64: > # ./cmk.darwin.arm64 -v > Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.3.0 (build: 860771a, > 2023-04-28T15:06:57+0300) > > On Ubuntu Linux 22.04 x86_64: > # ./bin/cmk -v > Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.3.0 (build: 860771a, > 2023-04-28T15:06:55+0300) > > I performed basic API calls to list various resources and deploy VM [1] > using the cmk CLI on darwin/arm64, both in interpreter mode and in a shell > script. Tested against a local 4.17.2.0 env and also the community QA > server; > > [1] cmd ref: deploy virtualmachine > serviceofferingid=1be5e5c5-1a1e-4a61-b717-b19ba10579aa > templateid=0392376b-ac6c-46cd-be15-48d8ea3ba175 > zoneid=c843ba49-21c3-4616-a3ff-07bb91db3a6b > networkids=6d625e42-f1cc-4fe1-be95-a28256fc6df2 > > > Regards. > > > From: Boris Stoyanov > Sent: Monday, May 1, 2023 19:48 > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; > users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 6.3.0 - RC1 > > Hi All, > > I've created a v6.3.0 release of CloudMonkey, with the following > artifacts up for a vote: > > Git Branch and commit SHA: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/commit/860771ad1e2a759a8099a4dbeb264c342e3b9577 > > Commit: > 860771ad1e2a759a8099a4dbeb264c342e3b9577 > > GitHub pre-release (for RC1 testing, contains changelog, > artifacts/binaries to test, checksums/usage details): > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-cloudmonkey/releases/tag/6.3.0 > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/cloudmonkey-6.3.0/ > > > PGP release keys (signed using 4A64E2F46BBC136DD92D71FB5B7DEFE0508A4AD8) > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > The vote will be open until 5th May, 2023. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason why) > > > > > > > > -- Daan
Re: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.18.1.0 release
Great, thanks Wei for volunteering Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Wei ZHOU Date: Thursday, 4 May 2023 at 05:34 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , users Subject: [PROPOSE] ACS 4.18.1.0 release Hi all, Currently CloudStack 4.18.0.0 is the latest LTS release. There are some bugs and pull requests with 4.18.0.0 [1], including the fix for the upgrade issue if users use MySQL 5.6 and 5.7. I would like to propose the release of 4.18.1.0 and the timeline - from now till the end of July (3 months): accept bug fixes and minor improvements [2] - first week in Aug: stablisation efforts, accept only blocker and critical bug fixes. - Aug: start cutting RCs, vote and finish release work. I will push myself as the release manager (RM) of 4.18.1.0, if nobody objects. In case anyone wants to include a bug fix or a pull request in 4.18.1.0 milestone, please mention me (weizhouapache) on github. [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/27 [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS Any suggestions ? Kind regards, Wei
Re: [ANNOUNCE] New VP of Apache CloudStack - Rohit Yadav
Congratulations Rohit and thanks Simon! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Simon Weller Date: Thursday, 30 March 2023 at 00:36 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: priv...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] New VP of Apache CloudStack - Rohit Yadav All, I'm very pleased to announce that the ASF board has accepted the nomination of Rohit Yadav to be the new VP of the Apache CloudStack project. It has been my pleasure to serve as the VP over the past year, and I'd like to thank the community for all of the support. Rohit, congratulations and I wish you the best as you take on this new role. -Simon
Re: Daan Hoogland - New ASF Member
Congratulations Daan! Regards, Nicolas Vaquez From: Paul Angus Sent: Friday, March 24, 2023 6:28:54 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Daan Hoogland - New ASF Member It is my pleasure to announce that Daan Hoogland as been elected to become a member of the ASF. The ASF would like to recognize both his practical involvement and the way in which he has interacted with others in and around the ASF. Congratulations Daan. Kind regards Paul Angus
Re: [4.18][RC3][VOTE] new release candidate 4.18.0.0-RC20230311T0935
+1 (binding) Tested the main operations on KVM EL8, Vmware 7 and XCPng 8.2 envs with advanced networking Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Boris Stoyanov Date: Wednesday, 15 March 2023 at 06:32 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users , PMC Subject: Re: [4.18][RC3][VOTE] new release candidate 4.18.0.0-RC20230311T0935 +1 (binding ) Tested the packages and did some main lifecycle operations, looks good. Thanks, Bobby. From: Rohit Yadav Date: Tuesday, 14 March 2023, 14:18 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users , PMC Subject: Re: [4.18][RC3][VOTE] new release candidate 4.18.0.0-RC20230311T0935 +1 (binding) Tested Advance zone env with mbx for two environments: (a) 2x VMware 8 and EL8 mgmt server, (b) EL9 hosts with EL8 mgmt server. Tested basic systemvm and normal VM lifecycle (start/stop/deploy), isolated network lifecycle (acquire IP, egress rules, pf, fw rules), manually tested console (on VMware8 and secured vnc on EL9 host). Tested login and operations as both root admin and normal user account. Regards. From: Nux Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2023 14:23 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users ; PMC Subject: Re: [4.18][RC3][VOTE] new release candidate 4.18.0.0-RC20230311T0935 Thanks for the packages, Daan. +1 from me (binding) based on testing I've done with KVM and SG zones (in addition to my previous testing on regular advanced zones). On 2023-03-13 10:41, Daan Hoogland wrote: > packages are available at > https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.18-rc3/ > and > http://packages.shapeblue.com/cloudstack/upstream/testing/4.18.0.0-RC20230311T0935/ > > On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 9:45 AM Daan Hoogland wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I've created a new 4.18 release candidate, with the following >> artifacts up for a vote: >> >> Git Branch and Commit >> SH:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.18.0.0-RC20230311T0935 >> Commit: 0574087284f8b646ebc41617cfd70b3a31e3ae94 >> >> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same >> location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.18.0.0 >> >> PGP release keys (signed using >> 256ABDFB8D89EDE07540BE6ACEF9E802B86FEED4):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours. (aiming for wednesday late) >> >> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >> >> [ ] +1 approve >> [ ] +0 no opinion >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >> >> As usual lately, I will work on getting some convenience packages >> ready and will follow up on this thread to link you to those. >> >> enjoy >> >>
Re: GSoC 2023
Hi all, The ASF has been announced as a participant organization for GSOC 2023. These are the existing potential ideas for GSOC 2023 so far. It is possible to create new ideas until the end of this week. If you are interested on creating new ideas, please create it as a Github issue and add the label ‘gsoc2023’ to it, or can ping me directly. Title Github issue JIRA ticket Autodetect IPs used inside the VM https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7142 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10455 Extend Import-Export Instances to the KVM Hypervisor https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7127 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10456 User friendly name of Downloaded Templates Volumes and ISOs https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6949 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10457 Test button addition in Domains LDAP config https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6934 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10458 Use Calico or Cilium in CKS https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6637 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10459 Configure NFS version for Primary Storage https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4482 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10460 SSL - LetsEncrypt the Console Proxy https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3141 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10461 Direct Download extension to Ceph storage https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/3065 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10462 Improve ConfigDrive to store network information https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/2872 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-10463 Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Rohit Yadav Date: Thursday, 26 January 2023 at 11:29 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org , d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: GSoC 2023 Thanks for volunteering Nicolas. Regards. From: Ivet Petrova Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2023 18:24 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: GSoC 2023 Hi Nicolas, Sounds great. Last two years we saw interesting participants and it is great to extend the community. Good luck! Kind regards, On 25 Jan 2023, at 18:47, Nicolas Vazquez mailto:nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: Hi all, Google Summer of Code (GSoC) 2023 has already been announced and the timeline is available on this link: https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline. I would like to volunteer as the coordinator for our GSoC involvement this year if nobody objects. Starting from this week, organizations can start submitting applications for the program. To submit your idea please create a GitHub issue at the official ACS repository with label “gsoc23” (such as: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Agsoc2023), we’ll later review and work with the ASF guys to make this list available for applications. You will also need to register as a mentor. To become a mentor you don’t need to be committer or PMC, just to have an idea and the will to support and guide a contributor developing it. Registering is also easy, please send an email to private@ and ask to be recognized as such. You can find the general information of the program on: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/ The announcement for this year: https://opensource.googleblog.com/2022/11/get-ready-for-google-summer-of-code-2023.html There are no major changes from the last year’s program, the only difference is this year GSoC is accepting begginers on open source software development and students as contributors. Please directly add your project idea, and of course if you have questions I’ll be available to help. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
Re: Hello Community!!
Welcome Jithin! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Jithin Raju Date: Tuesday, 14 March 2023 at 04:57 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org , d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Hello Community!! Hi All, I have joined ShapeBlue and looking forward to getting actively involved in the community. Previously I worked on the commercial fork of the ACS, mostly involved in technical support. -Jithin
Re: PROTOCOL NOT SHOWING IN WHILE ADDING THE PRIMARY STORAGE
I could obtain all the supported protocols for KVM when tried reproducing it, can you double check the hypervisor selected on the first step of the zone creation is KVM? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Sanjay Kumar Date: Tuesday, 7 March 2023 at 04:31 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: PROTOCOL NOT SHOWING IN WHILE ADDING THE PRIMARY STORAGE Thanks for your response We have selected KVM. On Tue, Mar 7, 2023, 12:47 AM Nicolas Vazquez wrote: > Hi Sanjay, > > > > Which hypervisor have you selected on the first step of the wizard? > > > > Regards, > > Nicolas Vazquez > > > > > > > > > > > *From: *Sanjay Kumar > *Date: *Monday, 6 March 2023 at 14:06 > *To: *users@cloudstack.apache.org > *Subject: *PROTOCOL NOT SHOWING IN WHILE ADDING THE PRIMARY STORAGE > > > We are facing strange issue while adding the primary storage in apache > cloudstack. the only showing SMB/CISF protocol during adding the primary > storage. Please help me out. > > > > ACS_VER: 4.17.2 > > > > > > > > Regards, > > Sanjay > > > > > > > > >
Re: PROTOCOL NOT SHOWING IN WHILE ADDING THE PRIMARY STORAGE
Hi Sanjay, Which hypervisor have you selected on the first step of the wizard? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Sanjay Kumar Date: Monday, 6 March 2023 at 14:06 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: PROTOCOL NOT SHOWING IN WHILE ADDING THE PRIMARY STORAGE We are facing strange issue while adding the primary storage in apache cloudstack. the only showing SMB/CISF protocol during adding the primary storage. Please help me out. ACS_VER: 4.17.2 [cid:ii_lex2o9n01] Regards, Sanjay
Re: Cloudstack volume path vs ID
Hi Mosharaf, The volume path indicates the disk location on the storage pool with ID = store_id column. The volume uuid is simply an identifier for the volume. Depending on the hypervisor you are using, both columns may be initially set to the same value (for example on KVM) and it may be possible the path could be changed after a volume migration. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Mosharaf Hossain Sent: Sunday, March 5, 2023 10:19 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Product Development | BEXIMCO IT Subject: Cloudstack volume path vs ID Dear Users I am facing a disk volume path and ID dilemma in Cloudstack. While the path and ID for some virtual machines are the same, they are different for other VMs. Would you kindly assist me in understanding how they differ from one another? Regards Mosharaf Hossain BEXIMCO
Re: [4.18][RELEASE] RC1 up for vote
Hi Daan (and all), Please find a fix for the mentioned issue on this PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7287 Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Nicolas Vazquez Date: Thursday, 23 February 2023 at 12:07 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org , PMC Subject: Re: [4.18][RELEASE] RC1 up for vote Sorry, have found a blocker on CPVM access for Vmware 6.7. I am investigating the issue and will update soon Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Daan Hoogland Date: Thursday, 23 February 2023 at 11:46 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org , PMC Subject: Re: [4.18][RELEASE] RC1 up for vote tnx Bryan, merged. @all I am awaiting final upgrade test results from some QA colleagues before I will create a new RC, hopefully today or tomorrow, for those that are looking to do something over the weekend. On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 6:34 PM Bryan Lima wrote: > Hey Daan, > > I addressed your review in the > PR#7257(https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7257). It is ready to > be merged for the RC2. > > Best regards, > > Bryan > > On 21/02/2023 09:43, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > @bryan, @sina, > > please make sure your PRs are tested and ready for merge, then I will > > include them, I think I will create the next RC tonight or tomorrow > > morning. Please let me know. > > I think all blocker issues so far have been solved. > > > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 12:30 AM Sina Kashipazha > > wrote: > > > >> Hey Daan, > >> > >> Thanks for the RC. Before saying anything, I should mention that I don't > >> have any votes here :-) > >> > >> I've tested some functionalities of the release. I found two issues one > is > >> related to the redundant virtual networks, and another one is related to > >> the service offering creation. I've created the following issues for > them. > >> Feel free to include or exclude them from the 4.18. They require some > >> changes in the UI. Nothing is wrong with the backend. > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7259 > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7260 > >> > >> We had another discussion about removing the ability of users to delete > >> their accounts. I've created the following PR for that. Again, feel > free to > >> include or exclude it from the 4.18. > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7219 > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Sina > >> --- Original Message --- > >> On Friday, February 17th, 2023 at 15:22, Daan Hoogland < > >> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> It is almost my end of week, but I will monitor this thread over the > >> weekend , so feel free to add fixes to the list. RC2 will be at the > >> earliest on monday. > >> > >> Have a nice weekend, > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 2:22 PM Daan Hoogland > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Bryan, I am open to low-risk fixes that people want in RC2. send me a > pr > >>> number or mark it for milestone 4.18.0.0. I will move it to another > >>> milestone if we decide it is too risky. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 2:13 PM Bryan Lima > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> As there will be a need for RC2, I found a small bug regarding the > Quota > >>>> enable config introduced in PR #6690. > >>>> > >>>> Even when the user has the plugin enabled, it will be displayed as > >>>> disabled, as presented in the image below. This is because in the > >>>> QuotaSummaryResponse, the parameter QuotaEnabled was not set. This is > a one > >>>> line fix, if you guys think is worth to put in release 4.18.0.0, let > me > >>>> know. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 16/02/2023 18:44, Nicolas Vazquez wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> Unfortunately I have to vote -1, found the console access was not > working for XCPng/Xen, staying Connecting indefinitely. Have produced a fix > for it: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7243 > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Nicolas Vazquez > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> From: João Jandre Paraquetti < > j...@scclouds.com.br> > >>>> Date: Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 17:21 > >>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org < > use
Re: [4.18][RELEASE] RC1 up for vote
Sorry, have found a blocker on CPVM access for Vmware 6.7. I am investigating the issue and will update soon Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Daan Hoogland Date: Thursday, 23 February 2023 at 11:46 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org , PMC Subject: Re: [4.18][RELEASE] RC1 up for vote tnx Bryan, merged. @all I am awaiting final upgrade test results from some QA colleagues before I will create a new RC, hopefully today or tomorrow, for those that are looking to do something over the weekend. On Tue, Feb 21, 2023 at 6:34 PM Bryan Lima wrote: > Hey Daan, > > I addressed your review in the > PR#7257(https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7257). It is ready to > be merged for the RC2. > > Best regards, > > Bryan > > On 21/02/2023 09:43, Daan Hoogland wrote: > > @bryan, @sina, > > please make sure your PRs are tested and ready for merge, then I will > > include them, I think I will create the next RC tonight or tomorrow > > morning. Please let me know. > > I think all blocker issues so far have been solved. > > > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2023 at 12:30 AM Sina Kashipazha > > wrote: > > > >> Hey Daan, > >> > >> Thanks for the RC. Before saying anything, I should mention that I don't > >> have any votes here :-) > >> > >> I've tested some functionalities of the release. I found two issues one > is > >> related to the redundant virtual networks, and another one is related to > >> the service offering creation. I've created the following issues for > them. > >> Feel free to include or exclude them from the 4.18. They require some > >> changes in the UI. Nothing is wrong with the backend. > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7259 > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7260 > >> > >> We had another discussion about removing the ability of users to delete > >> their accounts. I've created the following PR for that. Again, feel > free to > >> include or exclude it from the 4.18. > >> > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7219 > >> > >> Kind regards, > >> Sina > >> --- Original Message --- > >> On Friday, February 17th, 2023 at 15:22, Daan Hoogland < > >> daan.hoogl...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> It is almost my end of week, but I will monitor this thread over the > >> weekend , so feel free to add fixes to the list. RC2 will be at the > >> earliest on monday. > >> > >> Have a nice weekend, > >> > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 2:22 PM Daan Hoogland > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Bryan, I am open to low-risk fixes that people want in RC2. send me a > pr > >>> number or mark it for milestone 4.18.0.0. I will move it to another > >>> milestone if we decide it is too risky. > >>> > >>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 2:13 PM Bryan Lima > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> As there will be a need for RC2, I found a small bug regarding the > Quota > >>>> enable config introduced in PR #6690. > >>>> > >>>> Even when the user has the plugin enabled, it will be displayed as > >>>> disabled, as presented in the image below. This is because in the > >>>> QuotaSummaryResponse, the parameter QuotaEnabled was not set. This is > a one > >>>> line fix, if you guys think is worth to put in release 4.18.0.0, let > me > >>>> know. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 16/02/2023 18:44, Nicolas Vazquez wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi all, > >>>> > >>>> Unfortunately I have to vote -1, found the console access was not > working for XCPng/Xen, staying Connecting indefinitely. Have produced a fix > for it: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7243 > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Nicolas Vazquez > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> From: João Jandre Paraquetti < > j...@scclouds.com.br> > >>>> Date: Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 17:21 > >>>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org < > users@cloudstack.apache.org>, d...@cloudstack.apache.org < > d...@cloudstack.apache.org> > >>>> Subject: Re: [4.18][RELEASE] RC1 up for vote > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> Tested VM creation, migration, deletion, scaling, VM restart, VM > >>>> snapshot and restore f
Re: [4.18][RELEASE] RC1 up for vote
Hi all, Unfortunately I have to vote -1, found the console access was not working for XCPng/Xen, staying Connecting indefinitely. Have produced a fix for it: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7243 Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: João Jandre Paraquetti Date: Thursday, 16 February 2023 at 17:21 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org , d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [4.18][RELEASE] RC1 up for vote +1 Tested VM creation, migration, deletion, scaling, VM restart, VM snapshot and restore from snapshot. Tested volume creation, attach, detach, migration, deletion, volume snapshot and restore from snapshot. Tested registering a k8s ISO and creating a k8s cluster using the community ISO 1.24.0, also tested basic operations using k8s. Best regards, João Jandre (JoaoJandre) On 15/02/2023 04:49, Daan Hoogland wrote: > Rohit, I started building them and they should be ready but I haven´t made > them publicly available yet. I'll look at that today > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 2:46 AM Rohit Yadav > wrote: > >> Thanks Daan, are there convenience packages available somewhere we can >> test? >> >> Regards. >> >> Regards. >> >> From: Wei ZHOU >> Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2023 1:05:43 AM >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ; >> d...@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [4.18][RELEASE] RC1 up for vote >> >> Thanks Daan. >> >> The docker image of cloudstack-simulator for 4.18.0.0-RC1 can be found at >> >> https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/apache/cloudstack-simulator/general >> >> -Wei >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 at 10:31, Daan Hoogland >> wrote: >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I've created a 4.18.0.0 release candidate, with the following >>> artifacts up for a vote: >>> >>> Git Branch and Commit >>> SH: >>> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/4.18.0.0-RC20230214T0955 >>> Commit: c3a27df15a535d877b34a10564651fffb032f756 >>> >>> Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the following >>> location):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.18.0.0/ >>> >>> PGP release keys (signed using >>> ):https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS >>> >>> Vote will be open for 72 hours. >>> >>> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to >>> indicate "(binding)" with their vote? >>> >>> [ ] +1 approve >>> [ ] +0 no opinion >>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Daan >>> >
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Ivet Petrova has joined the PMC
Congratulations Ivet! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Simon Weller Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2023 1:01 PM To: priv...@cloudstack.apache.org ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Ivet Petrova has joined the PMC Hi everyone, It gives me great pleasure to announce that Ivet has been invited to join the CloudStack PMC and she has accepted. Please join me in congratulating Ivet! -Simon (on behalf of the CloudStack PMC)
Re: Issue adding host in cluster.
Hi Sanjay,
Which hypervisor is the host you are trying to add?
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
From: Sanjay Kumar
Date: Sunday, 12 February 2023 at 20:47
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ,
dev-subscr...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Issue adding host in cluster.
Hi All,
We are facing issue while adding the host in cluster. Please help me out to
solve the problem.
ACS_Version: 4.17.2
2023-02-13 05:04:35,759 ERROR [c.c.u.n.Link]
(AgentManager-SSLHandshakeHandler-4:null) (logid:) SSL error caught during
wrap data: Empty server certificate chain, for local address=/
10.10.11.52:8250, remote address=/10.10.11.21:45646.
2023-02-13 05:04:35,760 INFO [c.c.a.m.AgentManagerImpl]
(AgentManager-Handler-14:null) (logid:) Connection from /10.10.11.21 closed
but no cleanup was done.
2023-02-13 05:04:35,920 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(qtp1443435931-4966:ctx-bd1977c3) (logid:5b548f75) ===START=== 10.10.11.15
-- POST command=addHost=json
2023-02-13 05:04:35,929 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServer]
(qtp1443435931-4966:ctx-bd1977c3 ctx-b719489c) (logid:5b548f75) CIDRs from
which account 'Acct[a208e338-a909-11ed-8eef-9618ac1031f9-admin] -- Account
{"id": 2, "name": "admin", "uuid": "a208e338-a909-11ed-8eef-9618ac1031f9"}'
is allowed to perform API calls: 0.0.0.0/0,::/0
2023-02-13 05:04:35,936 WARN [c.c.a.d.ParamGenericValidationWorker]
(qtp1443435931-4966:ctx-bd1977c3 ctx-b719489c) (logid:5b548f75) Received
unknown parameters for command addHost. Unknown parameters : clustertype
2023-02-13 05:04:35,938 ERROR [c.c.a.ApiServer]
(qtp1443435931-4966:ctx-bd1977c3 ctx-b719489c) (logid:5b548f75) unhandled
exception executing api command: [Ljava.lang.String;@15ab4c10
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Guid is not updated for
cluster with specified cluster id; need to wait for hosts in this cluster
to come up
Regards,
Sanjay Kumar
Re: Introduction
Welcome Kiran! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Rohit Yadav Date: Thursday, 2 February 2023 at 06:30 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Kiran Chavala Subject: Re: Introduction Welcome to the community Kiran! Regards. From: Nux Sent: Thursday, February 2, 2023 13:23 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Kiran Chavala Subject: Re: Introduction Amazing, welcome Kiran! On 2023-02-02 05:23, Kiran Chavala wrote: > Hi all, > > > This is Kiran, Just wanted to say hi to everyone in the community. > > I've recently Shape blue as QA test engineer. > > Previously I used to work with Citrix/Persistent for about 10 years in > providing technical support to Cloudstack ( Citrix CloudPlatform and > Rovius CloudPlatform) products > > Looking forward to working with the community > > Regards, > Kiran > > kiran.chav...@shapeblue.com
GSoC 2023
Hi all, Google Summer of Code (GSoC) 2023 has already been announced and the timeline is available on this link: https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline. I would like to volunteer as the coordinator for our GSoC involvement this year if nobody objects. Starting from this week, organizations can start submitting applications for the program. To submit your idea please create a GitHub issue at the official ACS repository with label “gsoc23” (such as: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Agsoc2023), we’ll later review and work with the ASF guys to make this list available for applications. You will also need to register as a mentor. To become a mentor you don’t need to be committer or PMC, just to have an idea and the will to support and guide a contributor developing it. Registering is also easy, please send an email to private@ and ask to be recognized as such. You can find the general information of the program on: https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/ The announcement for this year: https://opensource.googleblog.com/2022/11/get-ready-for-google-summer-of-code-2023.html There are no major changes from the last year’s program, the only difference is this year GSoC is accepting begginers on open source software development and students as contributors. Please directly add your project idea, and of course if you have questions I’ll be available to help. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
Re: CloudStack and Tungsten Fabric Solution Brief
This is great, many thanks Ivet! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Ivet Petrova Date: Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 08:31 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org , d...@cloudstack.apache.org , Apache CloudStack Marketing Subject: CloudStack and Tungsten Fabric Solution Brief Hi all, I am happy to share a new solution brief we have developed together with the team of Tungsten Fabric: https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/entry/apache-cloudstack-and-tungsten-fabric If you are interested to learn more for SDN and how tungsten integrates with CloudStack take a look. Kind regards,
Re: List users in the same account
Hi Mevludin, As far as I know it’s not possible to list the other users in the same account for a user, however with that setting it is possible to list other user accounts that exist in the same domain Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Mevludin Blazevic Date: Tuesday, 24 January 2023 at 09:41 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: List users in the same account Hi all, is there a way to allow users of a specific account to list the other users under the same account? The only setting I can find is allow.user.view.all.domain.accounts that does something similar.. Regards, Mevludin
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.2.0 (RC3)
+1 (binding) Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Rohit Yadav Date: Friday, 16 December 2022 at 09:15 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.2.0 (RC3) +1 (binding) Based on upgrade tests and UI/various resource lifecycle tests from RC1-R3, and based on smoketests on 4.17 health check PR. Perform upgrade from 4.17.1.0 in my homelab KVM env to 4.17.2.0 RC3 and tested VM/volume/snapshot lifecycles are root admin and normal user in L2, shared and isolated networks. Regards. From: Daan Hoogland Sent: Friday, December 16, 2022 17:44 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.2.0 (RC3) +1 (binding) checked packages and basing on Bobby's work On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 10:44 AM Boris Stoyanov < boris.stoya...@shapeblue.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I’ve did a quick testing around main lifecycle operations of VMs, Volumes, > Networks, offerings and infra. Looks good to me. > > Regards, > Bobby. > > From: Rohit Yadav > Date: Wednesday, 14 December 2022, 7:27 > To: dev , users > Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.2.0 (RC3) > All, > > I've created a 4.17.2.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a > vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SHA: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.17.2.0-RC20221214T0522 > Commit: 5b9a989ab0dd6b8f482f4d6c6ce24e1a6108002e > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.17.2.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 5ED1E1122DC5E8A4A45112C2484248210EE3D884): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > The vote will be open for 72 hours, until the end of 16 Dec 2022. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate > "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason why) > > For users' convenience, the packages from this release candidate (RC3) and > 4.17.2 systemvmtemplates are available here: > https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.17.2.0-RC3/ (building/uploading) > https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.17/ > > Documentation is not officially published yet, you may refer to the > following doc PR: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/295 > > The list of changes included in this minor release over 4.17.1.0 can be > referenced here: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/26?closed=1 > > Regards. > > > > -- Daan
Re: [DISCUSS] Github Discussions for CloudStack?
+1 Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Rohit Yadav Date: Wednesday, 14 December 2022 at 06:08 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] Github Discussions for CloudStack? All, In the past, we had moved away from JIRA and ReviewBoard to Github as it provided a single platform for both the user and the dev community to collaborate on issues/requests and code changes (pull requests). We later organically started using Github for release milestones/triaging, recently projects. For sub-projects such as cloudstack-cloudmonkey, cloudstack-terraform-provider etc we also use the wiki features. More recently we're not advised to move to Github actions from Travis CI by ASF infra. Off lately, several user-related discussions and questions that we would have expected on the users ML are finding ways in Github issues, which aren't issues per se but questions, and discussions. Should we explore, enable and try Github Discussions [1] for CloudStack repos? Several Apache projects have enabled Github Discussions [1], for example: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/discussions https://github.com/apache/apisix/discussions https://github.com/apache/shardingsphere/discussions https://github.com/apache/streampipes/discussions https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions https://github.com/apache/airflow/discussions https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler/discussions https://github.com/apache/inlong/discussions https://github.com/apache/doris/discussions https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/discussions https://github.com/apache/superset/discussions [1] https://github.com/features/discussions Regards.
Re: [DISCUSS] ACS 4.17.2.0 release
Thanks Rohit, +1 on the short 4.17.2.0 release approach Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Rohit Yadav Date: Thursday, 24 November 2022 at 11:24 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] ACS 4.17.2.0 release All, Based on our 4.18 RM's proposed release schedule in early Q1, we have a few issues that are critical or blocker issues for some users. Among the issues is one that reports regression in the VPC feature - wherein for new VPCs or existing VPC, VPC VR patching fails when it isn't on the direct network as the management server. A fix for this particular issue would require a new systemvmtemplate which can be either built/shipped separately or re-bundled in the existing 4.17.1.0 packages but could require some systemvmtemplate upgrade process for existing users. I'm leaning towards doing a short 4.17.2.0 which is 4.17.1.0 plus tightly scoped critical/blocker fixes - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/26 if there are no objections. Please share if you've any other critical/blockers issues to report, or if you've any advice. Thanks. Regards.
Re: Console View Not Working
Hi Granwille, I see the RFB version offered by the VNC server is 3.8, and the CPVM currently can handle up to 3.3. Can you compare on your working zone the output of the telnet to a VNC working port? Is there any difference on the qemu/libvirt configurations on the hosts from each zone? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Granwille Strauss Date: Monday, 21 November 2022 at 08:20 To: Nux Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Console View Not Working Hi Its running on the KVM server: root@hostname ~ $ grep -w 5900 /etc/services rfb 5900/tcp# Remote Framebuffer rfb 5900/udp# Remote Framebuffer root@hostname ~ $ I stopped the firewall and was able to connect to the VNC service from the cpvm: root@v-78-VM:~# telnet 192.168.50.3 5900 Trying 192.168.50.3... Connected to 192.168.50.3. Escape character is '^]'. RFB 003.008 Thank you, this helps a lot. I am going to see if white listing some rules might work. And see if it works after testing. On 11/21/22 13:02, Nux wrote: Networking can get tricky, especially if you want to be too smart about it, it will bite back. Anyway, VNC port 5900, is that even listening on the hypervisor, what is ss/netstat saying? Try to find an existing port to test against. If that fails check/disable the firewall on the hypervisor or on any firewall device between management server and hypervisor. --- Nux www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> On 2022-11-21 10:47, Granwille Strauss wrote: Hi Nux Thanks for the update. I ssh'd into the CPVM and when I run `telnet HV_Private_IP 5900` I get no route error. But if I do this with my working existing zone it works fine. So it seems my systemvms cannot reach the VNC server but when I ping from cpvm to kvm private ip I get a successful response, this makes no sense. -- Regards / Groete [https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/logo/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/cd2904ba-304d-4a49-bf33-cbe9ac76d929_248x-.png]<https://www.namhost.com/> Granwille Strauss // Senior Systems Admin e: granwi...@namhost.com<mailto:granwi...@namhost.com> m: +264 81 323 1260 w: www.namhost.com<https://www.namhost.com/> [https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/social_icon_01/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/9151954b-b298-41aa-89c8-1d68af075373_48x48.png]<https://www.facebook.com/namhost>[https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/social_icon_02/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/85a9dc7c-7bd1-4958-85a9-e6a25baeb028_48x48.png]<https://twitter.com/namhost>[https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/social_icon_03/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/c1c5386c-914c-43cf-9d37-5b4aa8e317ab_48x48.png]<https://www.instagram.com/namhostinternetservices/>[https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/social_icon_04/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/3aaa7968-130e-48ec-821d-559a332cce47_48x48.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/namhos>[https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/social_icon_05/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/3a8c09e6-588f-43a8-acfd-be4423fd3fb6_48x48.png]<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTd5v-kVPaic_dguGur15AA> [https://www.adsigner.com/v1/i/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/banner/940x300]<https://www.adsigner.com/v1/l/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/banner> Namhost Internet Services (Pty) Ltd, 24 Black Eagle Rd, Hermanus, 7210, RSA The content of this message is confidential. If you have received it by mistake, please inform us by email reply and then delete the message. It is forbidden to copy, forward, or in any way reveal the contents of this message to anyone without our explicit consent. The integrity and security of this email cannot be guaranteed over the Internet. Therefore, the sender will not be held liable for any damage caused by the message. For our full privacy policy and disclaimers, please go to https://www.namhost.com/privacy-policy <https://www.adsigner.com/v1/c/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818>
Re: [PROPOSAL] postpone 4.18 to the new year
Thanks Daan, I’m +1 on postponing and getting these features and more contributions in. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Daan Hoogland Date: Saturday, 29 October 2022 at 05:25 To: users , dev Subject: [PROPOSAL] postpone 4.18 to the new year Users and devs, I announced to start the releasing by end of October [1] but I think we have a lot of promising PRs that would really make this release worthwhile. At the same time the noteworthy features that are in now are limited: What is in: - custom tarifs - Prometeus exporter enhancements - volume encryption - console access enhancements - custom DNS for guest networks pending: - ant-design upgrade #6369 - EMC networker B #6550 - clone virtual machine #5216 - keyboard shortcuts #5122 - vm deploy retry #6062 - tungsten fabric #4205 - intuitive global setting #5797 I want to therefore postpone the release till January, or at leaset till after CCC. I think a release will have much more value if we wait until some more of these are in. regards, [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/vnkd4gv43l94dsn3sn8g57mg236nostc
Re: Recurring Snaps Failing
Hi, As a final test I would suggest increasing the value of the ‘wait’ configuration. Checking the logs, it does not ever reach the point in which the snapshot is copied to the snapshots directory on primary storage and it may be taking too long. Currently, the operation is being timeout after 3600 seconds (2 * wait value?), can you try increasing it? It would require restarting the management server after applying the new value. If this doesn’t help please create a new issue on Github Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Granwille Strauss Date: Tuesday, 18 October 2022 at 09:31 To: Wei ZHOU Cc: Nicolas Vazquez , users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Recurring Snaps Failing Hi Guys Was there anything else I could do to get this fixed? Should I report this on Github? Also, is it possible to make recurring VM Snapshots and not only Volume Snapshots? On 10/18/22 11:43, Granwille Strauss wrote: Hi Wei Correct, yes VM Snapshot is 100% successful, its only volume snapshot that fails and its at the conversion it seems. As requested: root@HOSTNAME ~ $ virsh domblklist i-2-19-VM Target Source -- vda /mnt/81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89/635fd5b5-bf14-4cf4-979c-be8a649d5189 hdc - root@HOSTNAME ~ $ qemu-img info /mnt/81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89/635fd5b5-bf14-4cf4-979c-be8a649d5189 qemu-img: Could not open '/mnt/81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89/635fd5b5-bf14-4cf4-979c-be8a649d5189': Failed to get shared "write" lock Is another process using the image [/mnt/81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89/635fd5b5-bf14-4cf4-979c-be8a649d5189]? root@athena ~ $ Seems I cannot get you the details, however would this help? root@HOSTNAME /mnt/81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89 $ du * -sh 48G340cc676-4683-4424-beb7-8b33a5cb3dfe 42G4a56546f-4f63-41c2-a314-27619fe5c2dc 15G635fd5b5-bf14-4cf4-979c-be8a649d5189 21G70ffef79-3aad-43ab-93d1-153fcd34ad15 26G777b5149-50c0-4c0d-944b-873050c85419 20G867a61e8-4635-40e4-b1b1-c94b2a325b49 4.8Gb21551c6-8276-4e58-841e-4e5a02c0e163 11Gd2c4feca-da5c-44b3-8ecc-40a01fd6c243 40Gf50c0bca-3ae2-48ee-aa9d-0e2d4ec6ba92 24Gf9336d09-0b3d-42d8-9a24-883b022b6712 8.9Gf962cb2c-e03b-4ed2-a035-1870a367aa46 47Gfd573618-885e-48c7-86e6-b019e2311d76 8.0KKVMHA 15Gsnapshots root@HOSTNAME /mnt/81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89 $ I have also added latest agent.log from today. On 10/18/22 11:07, Wei ZHOU wrote: Hi, You can get the path of qcow2 image by "virsh domblklist i-2-19-VM". The QCOW2 image does not have .qcow2 as a suffix. >From what I see, a vm snapshot has been created 2022-10-18 09:44:21 +0200, >which is good as taking the snapshot started at the same time. so timed out when converting the vm snapshot to a qcow2 image (ons secondary storage) by "qemu-img convert". ps: the agent.log you attached is out-of-date. Please share the agent.log in few minutes after "2022-10-18 09:44:21" -Wei On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 at 10:53, Granwille Strauss mailto:granwi...@namhost.com>> wrote: Hi Wei Thank you for the update. Thus far all the snapshot tests I took were volume snaps and majority were when they are online and end up failing. However, there's one VM where it seems to work just fine, whether its online of offline and I am not sure what's different from this VM as all other VM use the same Almalinux template. Its just this one VM where it works as expected. In any case, I did a VM snapshot now with memory on my Ubuntu vm while it was online and the VM Snap was successful, no issues there. I ran a volume snap right after on the same ubuntu vm and it failed again as before, see attached screenshot. So VM snapshots seem to work fine, this tells me the issue is most likely when its converted to QCOW2. In any case, please see answers to your questions below: 1. I am not finding any .qcow2 images on the KVM server to list the QCOW2 size, or am I missing something? root@HOSTNAME ~ $ find / -type f -iname '*.qcow2' root@HOSTNAME ~ $ As requested, here's a snapshot list of the current vm I am testing on. Please let me know if you needed something specific? root@HOSTNAME ~ $ virsh snapshot-list i-2-19-VM Name Creation Time State --- 0843e6b1-cb12-495c-8d5f-35c9a3338db7 2022-10-17 18:41:08 +0200 disk-snapshot 2e77acb7-1be4-4417-858e-a1d0890f44f0 2022-10-17 19:57:03 +0200 disk-snapshot 68476e2a-aec8-4637-9c4b-2dc49d79bd82 2022-10-18 09:44:21 +0200 disk-snapshot c110058b-4661-42c0-b648-a54f4ba4beb7 2022-10-17 22:34:21 +0200 disk-snapshot i-2-19-VM_VS_202210180729242022-10-18 09:29:25 +0200 running 2. Attached is a txt file from yesterdays agent.log. This is all entries that happened between
Re: Recurring Snaps Failing
Can you try taking a manual volume snapshot and share both mgmt and agent logs please? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Granwille Strauss Date: Monday, 17 October 2022 at 13:15 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Nicolas Vazquez Subject: Re: Recurring Snaps Failing Hi I also see another issue with snaps, I deleted all the failed snaps via the cloud management UI. But to my surprise, they're all still at /mnt/primary/snapshots/ see attached screenshot. Something odd is going on with snapshots. On 10/17/22 17:35, Granwille Strauss wrote: Hi I am not 100% if I enabled debug correctly, I followed this https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/KVM+agent+debug and ran sed -i 's/INFO/DEBUG/g' /etc/cloudstack/agent/log4j-cloud.xml Attached are the two log files. Same error. I reboot SSVM & vRouter prior no luck. On 10/17/22 16:00, Granwille Strauss wrote: Hi No KVM is on its own server node and management on a different server node. However, management is is primary and secondary storage via NFS. I will enable DEBUG and re-run manual snap to replicate the error. On 10/17/22 15:42, Nicolas Vazquez wrote: Thanks, are the KVM agent and management server running on the same host? Can you increase the log level on the KVM agent logs to DEBUG and retry? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Granwille Strauss <mailto:granwi...@namhost.com> Date: Monday, 17 October 2022 at 10:04 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> <mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> Cc: Nicolas Vazquez <mailto:nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> Subject: Re: Recurring Snaps Failing Please find attached TXT On 10/17/22 14:54, Nicolas Vazquez wrote: Ok, seems like the command is not reaching the KVM host, can you share the full management server logs for job-796? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Granwille Strauss <mailto:granwi...@namhost.com> Date: Monday, 17 October 2022 at 09:32 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> <mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> Cc: Nicolas Vazquez <mailto:nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> Subject: Re: Recurring Snaps Failing Hi This is all agent threw during the snap process nothing else: 2022-10-17 13:39:12,375 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:a864f9f6) Asking libvirt to refresh storage pool 81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89 2022-10-17 13:40:13,276 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:445216f3) Trying to fetch storage pool ff9a58d8-fb77-49c8-92d1-7c82fc456297 from libvirt 2022-10-17 13:40:13,289 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:445216f3) Asking libvirt to refresh storage pool ff9a58d8-fb77-49c8-92d1-7c82fc456297 2022-10-17 13:40:13,378 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:445216f3) Trying to fetch storage pool 81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89 from libvirt 2022-10-17 13:40:13,393 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:445216f3) Asking libvirt to refresh storage pool 81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89 2022-10-17 13:41:13,950 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:87ecfee0) Trying to fetch storage pool ff9a58d8-fb77-49c8-92d1-7c82fc456297 from libvirt 2022-10-17 13:41:13,964 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:87ecfee0) Asking libvirt to refresh storage pool ff9a58d8-fb77-49c8-92d1-7c82fc456297 2022-10-17 13:41:14,054 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:87ecfee0) Trying to fetch storage pool 81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89 from libvirt 2022-10-17 13:41:14,067 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:87ecfee0) Asking libvirt to refresh storage pool 81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89 2022-10-17 13:41:57,753 WARN [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:d91c35e5) Expected 1 answers while executing SetMonitorServiceCommand but received 3 2022-10-17 13:41:57,938 INFO [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) (logid:1549c9a1) Fetching health check result for SEVERIPADDRESS and executing fresh checks: false On 10/17/22 14:29, Nicolas Vazquez wrote: Hi Groete, Can you share the CloudStack agent logs from the KVM host? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Granwille Strauss <mailto:granwi...@namhost.com.INVALID><mailto:granwi...@namhost.com.INVALID><mailto:granwi...@namhost.com.INVALID> Date: Monday, 17 October 2022 at 08:56 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> <mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.
Re: Recurring Snaps Failing
Thanks, are the KVM agent and management server running on the same host? Can you increase the log level on the KVM agent logs to DEBUG and retry? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Granwille Strauss Date: Monday, 17 October 2022 at 10:04 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Nicolas Vazquez Subject: Re: Recurring Snaps Failing Please find attached TXT On 10/17/22 14:54, Nicolas Vazquez wrote: Ok, seems like the command is not reaching the KVM host, can you share the full management server logs for job-796? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Granwille Strauss <mailto:granwi...@namhost.com> Date: Monday, 17 October 2022 at 09:32 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> <mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> Cc: Nicolas Vazquez <mailto:nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com> Subject: Re: Recurring Snaps Failing Hi This is all agent threw during the snap process nothing else: 2022-10-17 13:39:12,375 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:a864f9f6) Asking libvirt to refresh storage pool 81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89 2022-10-17 13:40:13,276 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:445216f3) Trying to fetch storage pool ff9a58d8-fb77-49c8-92d1-7c82fc456297 from libvirt 2022-10-17 13:40:13,289 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:445216f3) Asking libvirt to refresh storage pool ff9a58d8-fb77-49c8-92d1-7c82fc456297 2022-10-17 13:40:13,378 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:445216f3) Trying to fetch storage pool 81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89 from libvirt 2022-10-17 13:40:13,393 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:445216f3) Asking libvirt to refresh storage pool 81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89 2022-10-17 13:41:13,950 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:87ecfee0) Trying to fetch storage pool ff9a58d8-fb77-49c8-92d1-7c82fc456297 from libvirt 2022-10-17 13:41:13,964 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:87ecfee0) Asking libvirt to refresh storage pool ff9a58d8-fb77-49c8-92d1-7c82fc456297 2022-10-17 13:41:14,054 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:87ecfee0) Trying to fetch storage pool 81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89 from libvirt 2022-10-17 13:41:14,067 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:87ecfee0) Asking libvirt to refresh storage pool 81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89 2022-10-17 13:41:57,753 WARN [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:d91c35e5) Expected 1 answers while executing SetMonitorServiceCommand but received 3 2022-10-17 13:41:57,938 INFO [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource] (agentRequest-Handler-1:null) (logid:1549c9a1) Fetching health check result for SEVERIPADDRESS and executing fresh checks: false On 10/17/22 14:29, Nicolas Vazquez wrote: Hi Groete, Can you share the CloudStack agent logs from the KVM host? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Granwille Strauss <mailto:granwi...@namhost.com.INVALID><mailto:granwi...@namhost.com.INVALID><mailto:granwi...@namhost.com.INVALID> Date: Monday, 17 October 2022 at 08:56 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> <mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org><mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> Subject: Re: Recurring Snaps Failing Hi I ran a few more tests and can now finally make sense of the failure: 2022-10-17 13:39:08,556 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.d.d.CloudStackPrimaryDataStoreDriverImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-93cb161b job-806/job-807 ctx-3f9ccf45) (logid:8fd10b20) Failed to take snapshot: 23 2022-10-17 13:39:08,558 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.s.SnapshotServiceImpl] (Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-93cb161b job-806/job-807 ctx-3f9ccf45) (logid:8fd10b20) create snapshot Test001 failed: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to send command, due to Agent:1, com.cloud.exception.OperationTimedoutException: Commands 7160441932542378205 to Host 1 timed out after 3600 Seems to be a time out error. But there's no firewalls on the KVM host and NFS server to prevent connections and it worked fine before and randomly just stopped. So I still have no idea where to solve this as all other necessary settings are in place. Any ideas? On 10/17/22 08:51, Granwille Strauss wrote: Hi Guys I enabled recurring snap shots for my Linux VMs and they all seem to be failing with the following error: root@hostname ~ $ grep error /var/log/clouds
Re: Recurring Snaps Failing
Ok, seems like the command is not reaching the KVM host, can you share the full
management server logs for job-796?
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
From: Granwille Strauss
Date: Monday, 17 October 2022 at 09:32
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Nicolas Vazquez
Subject: Re: Recurring Snaps Failing
Hi
This is all agent threw during the snap process nothing else:
2022-10-17 13:39:12,375 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:a864f9f6) Asking libvirt to refresh
storage pool 81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89
2022-10-17 13:40:13,276 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:445216f3) Trying to fetch storage pool
ff9a58d8-fb77-49c8-92d1-7c82fc456297 from libvirt
2022-10-17 13:40:13,289 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:445216f3) Asking libvirt to refresh
storage pool ff9a58d8-fb77-49c8-92d1-7c82fc456297
2022-10-17 13:40:13,378 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:445216f3) Trying to fetch storage pool
81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89 from libvirt
2022-10-17 13:40:13,393 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:445216f3) Asking libvirt to refresh
storage pool 81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89
2022-10-17 13:41:13,950 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:87ecfee0) Trying to fetch storage pool
ff9a58d8-fb77-49c8-92d1-7c82fc456297 from libvirt
2022-10-17 13:41:13,964 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-5:null) (logid:87ecfee0) Asking libvirt to refresh
storage pool ff9a58d8-fb77-49c8-92d1-7c82fc456297
2022-10-17 13:41:14,054 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:87ecfee0) Trying to fetch storage pool
81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89 from libvirt
2022-10-17 13:41:14,067 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:87ecfee0) Asking libvirt to refresh
storage pool 81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89
2022-10-17 13:41:57,753 WARN [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-3:null) (logid:d91c35e5) Expected 1 answers while
executing SetMonitorServiceCommand but received 3
2022-10-17 13:41:57,938 INFO [resource.virtualnetwork.VirtualRoutingResource]
(agentRequest-Handler-1:null) (logid:1549c9a1) Fetching health check result for
SEVERIPADDRESS and executing fresh checks: false
On 10/17/22 14:29, Nicolas Vazquez wrote:
Hi Groete,
Can you share the CloudStack agent logs from the KVM host?
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
From: Granwille Strauss
<mailto:granwi...@namhost.com.INVALID>
Date: Monday, 17 October 2022 at 08:56
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>
<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Recurring Snaps Failing
Hi
I ran a few more tests and can now finally make sense of the failure:
2022-10-17 13:39:08,556 DEBUG
[o.a.c.s.d.d.CloudStackPrimaryDataStoreDriverImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-93cb161b job-806/job-807 ctx-3f9ccf45)
(logid:8fd10b20) Failed to take snapshot: 23
2022-10-17 13:39:08,558 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.s.SnapshotServiceImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-93cb161b job-806/job-807 ctx-3f9ccf45)
(logid:8fd10b20) create snapshot Test001 failed:
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to send command, due to
Agent:1, com.cloud.exception.OperationTimedoutException: Commands
7160441932542378205 to Host 1 timed out after 3600
Seems to be a time out error. But there's no firewalls on the KVM host and NFS
server to prevent connections and it worked fine before and randomly just
stopped.
So I still have no idea where to solve this as all other necessary settings are
in place. Any ideas?
On 10/17/22 08:51, Granwille Strauss wrote:
Hi Guys
I enabled recurring snap shots for my Linux VMs and they all seem to be failing
with the following error:
root@hostname ~ $ grep error
/var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log
2022-10-17 03:01:29,474 ERROR [o.a.c.a.c.u.s.CreateSnapshotCmd]
(API-Job-Executor-27:ctx-99d7d702 job-796 ctx-f26a81fe) (logid:f9a61b00) Failed
to create snapshot due to an internal error creating snapshot for volume
635fd5b5-bf14-4cf4-979c-be8a649d5189
2022-10-17 03:01:29,476 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-27:ctx-99d7d702 job-796) (logid:f9a61b00) Complete async
job-796, jobStatus: FAILED, resultCode: 530, result:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.ExceptionResponse/null/{"uuidList":[],"errorcode":"530","errortext":"Failed
to create snapshot due to an internal error creating snapshot for volume
635fd5b5-bf14-4cf4-979c-be8a649d5189"}
2022-10-17 03:01:29,478 ERROR [o.a.c.a.c.u.s.CreateSnapshotCmd]
(API-Job-Executor-26:ctx-c7865967 job-794 ctx-0700afb0) (logid:5541113c) Failed
to create snap
Re: Recurring Snaps Failing
Hi Groete,
Can you share the CloudStack agent logs from the KVM host?
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
From: Granwille Strauss
Date: Monday, 17 October 2022 at 08:56
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Recurring Snaps Failing
Hi
I ran a few more tests and can now finally make sense of the failure:
2022-10-17 13:39:08,556 DEBUG
[o.a.c.s.d.d.CloudStackPrimaryDataStoreDriverImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-93cb161b job-806/job-807 ctx-3f9ccf45)
(logid:8fd10b20) Failed to take snapshot: 23
2022-10-17 13:39:08,558 DEBUG [o.a.c.s.s.SnapshotServiceImpl]
(Work-Job-Executor-1:ctx-93cb161b job-806/job-807 ctx-3f9ccf45)
(logid:8fd10b20) create snapshot Test001 failed:
com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Failed to send command, due to
Agent:1, com.cloud.exception.OperationTimedoutException: Commands
7160441932542378205 to Host 1 timed out after 3600
Seems to be a time out error. But there's no firewalls on the KVM host and NFS
server to prevent connections and it worked fine before and randomly just
stopped.
So I still have no idea where to solve this as all other necessary settings are
in place. Any ideas?
On 10/17/22 08:51, Granwille Strauss wrote:
Hi Guys
I enabled recurring snap shots for my Linux VMs and they all seem to be failing
with the following error:
root@hostname ~ $ grep error
/var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log
2022-10-17 03:01:29,474 ERROR [o.a.c.a.c.u.s.CreateSnapshotCmd]
(API-Job-Executor-27:ctx-99d7d702 job-796 ctx-f26a81fe) (logid:f9a61b00) Failed
to create snapshot due to an internal error creating snapshot for volume
635fd5b5-bf14-4cf4-979c-be8a649d5189
2022-10-17 03:01:29,476 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-27:ctx-99d7d702 job-796) (logid:f9a61b00) Complete async
job-796, jobStatus: FAILED, resultCode: 530, result:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.ExceptionResponse/null/{"uuidList":[],"errorcode":"530","errortext":"Failed
to create snapshot due to an internal error creating snapshot for volume
635fd5b5-bf14-4cf4-979c-be8a649d5189"}
2022-10-17 03:01:29,478 ERROR [o.a.c.a.c.u.s.CreateSnapshotCmd]
(API-Job-Executor-26:ctx-c7865967 job-794 ctx-0700afb0) (logid:5541113c) Failed
to create snapshot due to an internal error creating snapshot for volume
70ffef79-3aad-43ab-93d1-153fcd34ad15
2022-10-17 03:01:29,480 DEBUG [o.a.c.f.j.i.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(API-Job-Executor-26:ctx-c7865967 job-794) (logid:5541113c) Complete async
job-794, jobStatus: FAILED, resultCode: 530, result:
org.apache.cloudstack.api.response.ExceptionResponse/null/{"uuidList":[],"errorcode":"530","errortext":"Failed
to create snapshot due to an internal error creating snapshot for volume
70ffef79-3aad-43ab-93d1-153fcd34ad15"}
All I am getting out of this is internal error and nothing else. I have checked
other logs and I am not quite sure where else to look.
Any assistance in this regard will be appreciated.
--
Regards / Groete
[https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/logo/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/cd2904ba-304d-4a49-bf33-cbe9ac76d929_248x-.png]<https://www.namhost.com/>
Granwille Strauss // Senior Systems Admin
e: granwi...@namhost.com<mailto:granwi...@namhost.com>
m: +264 81 323 1260
w: www.namhost.com<https://www.namhost.com/>
[https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/social_icon_01/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/9151954b-b298-41aa-89c8-1d68af075373_48x48.png]<https://www.facebook.com/namhost>[https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/social_icon_02/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/85a9dc7c-7bd1-4958-85a9-e6a25baeb028_48x48.png]<https://twitter.com/namhost>[https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/social_icon_03/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/c1c5386c-914c-43cf-9d37-5b4aa8e317ab_48x48.png]<https://www.instagram.com/namhostinternetservices/>[https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/social_icon_04/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/3aaa7968-130e-48ec-821d-559a332cce47_48x48.png]<https://www.linkedin.com/company/namhos>[https://www.adsigner.com/v1/s/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/social_icon_05/621b3fa39fb210001f975298/3a8c09e6-588f-43a8-acfd-be4423fd3fb6_48x48.png]<https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTd5v-kVPaic_dguGur15AA>
[https://www.adsigner.com/v1/i/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/banner/940x300]<https://www.adsigner.com/v1/l/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/banner>
Namhost Internet Services (Pty) Ltd,
24 Black Eagle Rd, Hermanus, 7210, RSA
The content of this message is confidential. If you have received it by
mistake, please inform us by email reply and then delete the message. It is
forbidden to copy, forward, or in any way reveal the contents of thi
Re: Cannot find storage pool
Hi Groete, If the problem still persists, can you please increase the log level to debug on the KVM host, recreate the issue and share if any issues on the host agent logs? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Nux Date: Thursday, 29 September 2022 at 11:08 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Granwille Strauss Subject: Re: Cannot find storage pool If you have a firewall between hosts and NFS server turn it off and try again. Also try to force NFS protocol v3 or 4, see if it makes a difference. --- Nux www.nux.ro<http://www.nux.ro> On 2022-09-29 13:28, Granwille Strauss wrote: The problem is back again. I tried creating new volume snapshot again. And once again, the process has gone stuck. All I's up and running, NFS is also active. Maybe this is a bug for KVM? On 9/29/22 13:41, Granwille Strauss wrote: Hi I am not sure what happened but during the Volume Snap I ran my NFS server magically stopped working. And this caused the snap process to hung and also caused the mount error below. I had to comment the lines in /etc/exports, reload deamon and only then could I start NFS again. I then uncomment lines in /etc/exports and deamon reload again and now storage was back up and now host can connect to CM again. Not sure why NFS random dropped for no reason. On 9/29/22 12:36, Slavka Peleva wrote: Hi Groete, Can you share the end of this message? internal error: Child process (/usr/bin/mount -o nodev,nosuid,noexec 156.38.173.122:/mnt/primary /mnt/81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89) unexpected exit st> Best regards, Slavka On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 1:17 PM Granwille Strauss <mailto:granwi...@namhost.com.invalid> wrote: Hi Guys I tried making volume snapshots and the first 4 VMs were succesfull. When I tried the 5th VM volume snapshot, the process just "hung" and managed to get stuck in "snapshotting" and in "Creating" states. I rebooted both my KVM server and CM server and now the host cannot connect to CM. I am getting this error: 2022-09-29 12:11:37,104 INFO [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor] (agentRequest-Handler-2:null) (logid:c2cf2636) Didn't find an existing storage pool 81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89 by UUID, checking for pools with duplicate paths I updated the snapshots and volumes table in database and set status and state to "Ready" and "BackedUp" restarted CM and agent with no luck. I rebooted libvrtd too but its looking for the storage pool and I have no idea where or what happened with it: internal error: Child process (/usr/bin/mount -o nodev,nosuid,noexec 156.38.173.122:/mnt/primary /mnt/81ffca3a-9775-375d-a1c0-9504c0ec3d89) unexpected exit st> My primary storage is on CM server at /mnt/primary but I also have local storage enabled at /var/lib/libvirt/images Any help please? My host is not connecting any more and all production VMs are down. -- Regards / Groete <https://www.namhost.com><https://www.namhost.com> Granwille Strauss // Senior Systems Admin *e:* granwi...@namhost.com<mailto:granwi...@namhost.com> *m:* +264 81 323 1260 <+264813231260> *w:* www.namhost.com<http://www.namhost.com> <https://www.facebook.com/namhost><https://www.facebook.com/namhost> <https://twitter.com/namhost><https://twitter.com/namhost> <https://www.instagram.com/namhostinternetservices/><https://www.instagram.com/namhostinternetservices/> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/namhos><https://www.linkedin.com/company/namhos> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTd5v-kVPaic_dguGur15AA><https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTd5v-kVPaic_dguGur15AA> <https://www.adsigner.com/v1/l/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/banner><https://www.adsigner.com/v1/l/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818/banner> Namhost Internet Services (Pty) Ltd, 24 Black Eagle Rd, Hermanus, 7210, RSA The content of this message is confidential. If you have received it by mistake, please inform us by email reply and then delete the message. It is forbidden to copy, forward, or in any way reveal the contents of this message to anyone without our explicit consent. The integrity and security of this email cannot be guaranteed over the Internet. Therefore, the sender will not be held liable for any damage caused by the message. For our full privacy policy and disclaimers, please go to https://www.namhost.com/privacy-policy [image: Powered by AdSigner] <https://www.adsigner.com/v1/c/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818><https://www.adsigner.com/v1/c/631091998d4670001fe43ec2/621c9b76c140bb001ed0f818> -- Regards / Groete [cid:16644604786335a6be94617061139313@li.nux.ro]<https://www.namhost.com/> Granwille Strauss // Senior Systems Admin e: granwi...@namhost.com<mailto:granwi...@namhost.com> m: +264
Re: [PROPOSAL] rough release timeline and release manager 4.18
Thanks Daan, the proposed plan LGTM Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Daan Hoogland Date: Tuesday, 27 September 2022 at 09:22 To: dev , users Subject: [PROPOSAL] rough release timeline and release manager 4.18 As I have had no answers to the question in the mail quoted below, I am proposing the following: - In November, as early as possible, I plan to create the first RC. - This means that any feature must be in by the third week of October. - We will freeze the main branch from the last week of October on, only to be changed by me from that time on. I will do everything in my power to make this of course as short a period as possible. I realise that the fact that no-one has come forward with any PRs that must go in, does not mean there are none. I know some features are out there which are promising. But for now I am assuming we will have everything that needs to go in, in. Please let me know your concerns and let's discuss. On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 4:23 PM Daan Hoogland wrote: > Hello everybody, > As Abhishek is wrapping up the 4.17.1 release. I´d like to start the > discussion about 4.18. Nobody has volunteered as the next release manager > yet and I'd like to give the community the opportunity to prevent it > becoming me. My idea is that we will have set a feature freeze date and > then a target date for the first RC. Iḿ not proposing one now as mine would > probably be too tight a deadline for new features and there are some big > ones out there that we'd want in. > Please let us all know what you have in the pipeline and what you want in > and what time you need, so we can discuss if it is feasible for 4.18. > Also please come forward if you want this task of triaging issues and PRs > and tagging them to go in the release. > thanks > > -- > Daan > > -- Daan
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.17.1.0 (RC2)
+1 (binding) Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Abhishek Kumar Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2022 6:41 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.17.1.0 (RC2) Hi All, I've created a 4.17.1.0 release, with the following artifacts up for a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.17.1.0-RC20220914T1258 Commit: 350ef38e1cbd001c77e6b919b8f1fedcf1bcce64 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.17.1.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 65518106473A09D7AF26B384A70BD2EAA74E2866): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS Vote will be open for 72 hours. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For users convenience, the packages from this release candidate (RC2) and 4.17.0 systemvmtemplates (there is no change in system VM template since 4.17.0.0 release and the same 4.17.0 system VM templates can be used) are available here: https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.17.1.0-RC2/ https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.17/ Documentation is not published yet, but the following may be referenced for upgrade related tests: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/tree/4.17/source/upgrading/upgrade Regards, Abhishek
Re: 4.17.1.0 release
Looks good, thanks Abhishek Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Abhishek Kumar Date: Tuesday, 30 August 2022 at 10:20 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org , d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: 4.17.1.0 release All, We've 5 items remaining on the 4.17.1.0 milestone now: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/25 Considering these and the previously proposed rough timeline, I would like to propose 4.17 branch soft freeze from tomorrow 31 Aug 2022, after which only blocker and critical fixes will be allowed with the RC1 cut during next week depending on the branch stability. Thoughts, objections? Regards, Abhishek
Re: [PROPOSE] CloudStack 4.17.1.0 release and RM
LGTM thanks Abhishek! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Nux Date: Wednesday, 3 August 2022 at 13:31 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] CloudStack 4.17.1.0 release and RM +1, thanks for volunteering Abhishek. You'll do a great job. --- Nux www.nux.ro On 2022-08-02 18:37, Abhishek Kumar wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose and put myself forward as the release manager > for the 4.17.1.0 release. My colleague Nicolas Vazquez will support me > as the co-RM for the PR reviews/tests/merges, and others are welcome > to support as well. > We can keep the scope limited to include only bugs, critical issues > and fixes for a stable release. I see about 89 closed issues/PRs > already on the 4.17.1.0 milestone[1] and some 24 items are remaining. > > I propose the following timeline, aiming to cut the first RC around > the end of August. > - ~3 weeks from now till late August 2022 (Ongoing): Accept all > bugs, issues and minor improvements allowed in LTS [2] > - 1 week: Accept only critical/blocker fixes, stabilize 4.17 > branch > - end-August 2022 and onwards: Cut 4.17.1.0 RC1 and further RCs > if necessary, start/conclude vote, and finish release work > > Please let me know if you have any thoughts/comments. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/25 > [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS > > Regards, > Abhishek
[ADVISORY] Apache CloudStack Advisory on KVM Shared Mount Point issues on version 4.17.0.0
On 14th June 2022, a new issue affecting only KVM users using Shared Mount Point storage was reported [1]. This issue affects the creation and the usage of existing Shared Mount Point storage pools on Apache CloudStack 4.17.0.0. Apache CloudStack 4.17.0.0 added support for the StorPool storage based on Shared Mount Point. However, the current version of CloudStack doesn't allow multiple implementations of Shared Mount Point storage pool providers, causing the StorPool provider to override the default implementation. This affected the other storage pool providers for Shared Mount Point since CloudStack tries to add them as a StorPool storage pool. To mitigate the issue, a CloudStack administrator needs to do the following on version 4.17.0.0: - On each management server: stop the CloudStack management service, remove the Storpool plugin jar on /usr/share/cloudstack-management/lib/cloud-plugin-storage-volume-storpool-4.17.0.0.jar and restart the Cloudstack management service - On each KVM host: stop the CloudStack agent service, remove the StorPool plugin jar on /usr/share/cloudstack-agent/lib/cloud-plugin-storage-volume-storpool-4.17.0.0.jar and restart the CloudStack agent service Note: This workaround removes the StorPool plugin support. StorPool users should not apply the workaround to continue using their Storpool storage. This issue will be fixed in the upcoming CloudStack version 4.17.1.0. [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6455
[ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack 4.17.0.0 Release
*The Apache Software Foundation Announces Apache**®** CloudStack**®** v4.17* Apache CloudStack 4.17.0.0 is a 4.17 LTS release with 383 new features, improvements and bug fixes since 4.16, including 16 major new features. Some of the highlights include: - IPv6 with Static Routing - Zero Downtime Upgrades - Virtual Router Live Patching - CloudStack Status & management - User Shared Networks - StorPool storage plugin - Storage-based Snapshots for KVM Instances - Attach and detach features to UI for ROOT disks - Enable CloudStack to use multiple LOCAL storage pools - Multiple SSH Keys support - Reserve and release Public IPs # Documentation The full list of new features can be found in the project release notes at http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.17.0.0/releasenotes/changes.html The CloudStack documentation includes upgrade instructions from previous versions of Apache CloudStack, and can be found at: http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.17.0.0/upgrading/index.html The official installation, administration and API documentation for each of the releases are available on our documentation page: http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/ # Downloads The official source code for the 4.17.0.0 release can be downloaded from our downloads page: http://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html In addition to the official source code release, individual contributors have also made convenience binaries available on the Apache CloudStack download page, and can be found at: https://download.cloudstack.org/ubuntu/dists/ https://download.cloudstack.org/centos/7/ https://download.cloudstack.org/centos/8/ https://download.cloudstack.org/suse/15 https://www.shapeblue.com/packages/
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.0.0
Thanks Jamie, it is expected in the next few days Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Jamie Pell Date: Monday, 6 June 2022 at 12:03 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.0.0 Hi all, Marco Sinhoreli and I have been collaborating on 4.17 release announcement for the Apache CloudStack blog. If I could be updated on the timing of 4.17 release that would be much appreciated! Thanks, Jamie Pell From: Nicolas Vazquez Date: Monday, 6 June 2022 at 14:22 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , users Subject: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.0.0 Hi all, The vote for CloudStack 4.17.0.0 *passes* with 3 PMC + 4 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) Rohit Boris Daan +1 (non binding) Slavka Vladimir Abhishek Suresh 0 Wei -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
[RESULT][VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.0.0
Hi all, The vote for CloudStack 4.17.0.0 *passes* with 3 PMC + 4 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) Rohit Boris Daan +1 (non binding) Slavka Vladimir Abhishek Suresh 0 Wei -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.0.0 RC4
Sorry for the typo – meant RC4 instead of RCR :) For testing purposes, I have uploaded convenience packages to: https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.17.0.0-RC4/ The system VM template can be downloaded from here if needed: https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.17 Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Nicolas Vazquez Date: Tuesday, 31 May 2022 at 14:40 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , users Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.0.0 RC4 Hi all, I have created a 4.17.0.0 release (RCR) with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.17.0.0-RC20220531T1433 Commit: c56220fcf2348c7809331dcc266775f3d7130fe6 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.17.0.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 239A653975E13A0EEF5122A1656E1BCC8CB54F84): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open until 6th June 2022. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.0.0 RC4
Hi all, I have created a 4.17.0.0 release (RCR) with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.17.0.0-RC20220531T1433 Commit: c56220fcf2348c7809331dcc266775f3d7130fe6 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.17.0.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 239A653975E13A0EEF5122A1656E1BCC8CB54F84): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open until 6th June 2022. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
Re: Cloudstack 4.16.1.0 + Rocky 8.6/Alma 8.6
Thanks Wei for providing the patch. Just wanted to explicitly mention to apply the patch please make sure to backup the original .jar file and replace it with the patch jar keeping the original name (cloud-plugin-hypervisor-kvm-4.16.1.0.jar). This will prevent any issues on future upgrades Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Wei ZHOU Date: Tuesday, 24 May 2022 at 16:59 To: users Subject: Re: Cloudstack 4.16.1.0 + Rocky 8.6/Alma 8.6 Hi Andrey, Glad to know it. Thanks for your update. -Wei On Tue, 24 May 2022 at 19:34, Andrey Smirnov wrote: > Wei, > > I have just tested your jar file -- and it fixes the issue I described. > Thank you so much for your help, I really appreciate it. > > Sincerely > > Andrey > > On 5/24/22 1:16 PM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > > Hi Andrey, > > > > 4.17.0.0 will be released in the coming days. > > > > I just cherry-picked the commits to 4.16.1.0 release, and created a > patch. > > If you want to test it , please check > > https://github.com/weizhouapache/cloudstack/releases/tag/4.16.1.0-patch1 > > > > -Wei > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 24 May 2022 at 17:50, Andrey Smirnov > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Wei, > >> > >> I appreciate your quick response -- but what should I do? -- to wait > until > >> next Cloudstack release fixes it and which one does it? > >> On 5/24/22 11:36 AM, Wei ZHOU wrote: > >> > >> Hi Andrey, > >> > >> Then it is related to these commits > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/5012 (root cause) > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/6253 (fix1) > >> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/6399 (fix2) > >> > >> -Wei > >> > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.0.0 RC3
All, For testing purposes, I have uploaded convenience packages to: https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.17.0.0-RC3/ The system VM template can be downloaded from here if needed: https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.17 Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Nicolas Vazquez Date: Tuesday, 24 May 2022 at 11:59 To: users , d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.0.0 RC3 Hi all, I have created a 4.17.0.0 release (RC3) with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.17.0.0-RC20220524T1031 Commit: 8b9150cf3cb0bf469272ef1662993e092a36f747 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.17.0.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 239A653975E13A0EEF5122A1656E1BCC8CB54F84): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open until 29th May 2022. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.17.0.0 RC3
Hi all, I have created a 4.17.0.0 release (RC3) with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.17.0.0-RC20220524T1031 Commit: 8b9150cf3cb0bf469272ef1662993e092a36f747 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.17.0.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 239A653975E13A0EEF5122A1656E1BCC8CB54F84): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open until 29th May 2022. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.17.0.0 RC2
Thanks all, After testing last week have found out another blocker being fixed by PR: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/6393, will cut RC3 after it is finished. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Suresh Anaparti Date: Wednesday, 11 May 2022 at 10:15 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.17.0.0 RC2 -1 Agree with Rohit, it's better to continue testing this week. Found an issue with change disk offering, created issue here: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6372 Regards, Suresh On 11/05/22, 5:37 PM, "Rohit Yadav" wrote: -1 (binding) There are a few issues found in RC2 testing, a few of them are to do with systemvmtemplate patching [1] which is a blocker. I suggest we continue testing this week and cut RC3 next week to give users/testers more time to test and report issues as 4.17 is a major release. I found an issue with UI which appears to be a build issue, in the first RC2 pkgs for testing systemvmtemplate weren't included and in the next re-build the UI elements were not following right css which were fixed with the correct packaging builds (with no changes in the code). [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/6371 Regards. From: Wei ZHOU Sent: Monday, May 9, 2022 20:33 To: users Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.17.0.0 RC2 +1 (binding) Tested vm/volume lifecycles on ubuntu 20 and vmware 70u3 Tested IPv6 static routing Tested kubernetes cluster with k8s 1.24.0. (found a bug and fixed it by https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/6368, but I think it is not a blocker/critical issue for RC2) -Wei On Sun, 8 May 2022 at 05:53, Nicolas Vazquez wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created a 4.17.0.0 release (RC2) with the following artefacts up > for testing and a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.17.0.0-RC20220507T2233 > Commit: 6a36c59d341fb76fc6f9c90762ba5ca924e8d048 > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.17.0.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 239A653975E13A0EEF5122A1656E1BCC8CB54F84): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > For testing purposes, I have uploaded convenience packages to: > https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.17.0.0-RC2/ > > The system VM template can be downloaded from here if needed: > https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.17 > > The vote will be open until 11th May 2022. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards, > Nicolas Vazquez > > > >
[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.17.0.0 RC2
Hi all, I have created a 4.17.0.0 release (RC2) with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.17.0.0-RC20220507T2233 Commit: 6a36c59d341fb76fc6f9c90762ba5ca924e8d048 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.17.0.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 239A653975E13A0EEF5122A1656E1BCC8CB54F84): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS For testing purposes, I have uploaded convenience packages to: https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.17.0.0-RC2/ The system VM template can be downloaded from here if needed: https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.17 The vote will be open until 11th May 2022. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.17.0.0 RC1
Thanks Wei – looking forward to getting the fix ready and cutting RC2 Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Wei ZHOU Date: Tuesday, 3 May 2022 at 04:34 To: users , d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.17.0.0 RC1 Hi Nicolas, Thank you for the hard work ! Unfortunately I have to vote -1 on RC1. We have found a blocker issue with IPv6 with non-redundant isolated networks. We are working on the fix: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/6343 Kind regards, Wei On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 at 20:36, Nicolas Vazquez wrote: > Hi all, > > I have created a 4.17.0.0 release (RC1) with the following artefacts up > for testing and a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SH: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.17.0.0-RC20220429T1412 > Commit: 9ec270aa63a0ac479322a6f95146d20aa811ea23 > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.17.0.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using 239A653975E13A0EEF5122A1656E1BCC8CB54F84): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > For testing purposes, I have uploaded the different distro packages to: > https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.17.0.0-RC1/ > > Since 4.16 the system VM template registration is no longer mandatory > prior to upgrading, however, it can be downloaded from here if needed: > https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.17/ > > The vote will be open until 4th May 2022. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > Regards, > Nicolas Vazquez > > > > >
[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.17.0.0 RC1
Hi all, I have created a 4.17.0.0 release (RC1) with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.17.0.0-RC20220429T1412 Commit: 9ec270aa63a0ac479322a6f95146d20aa811ea23 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.17.0.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 239A653975E13A0EEF5122A1656E1BCC8CB54F84): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS For testing purposes, I have uploaded the different distro packages to: https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.17.0.0-RC1/ Since 4.16 the system VM template registration is no longer mandatory prior to upgrading, however, it can be downloaded from here if needed: https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.17/ The vote will be open until 4th May 2022. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
Re: CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2022 - November 14-16
Sounds great, thanks Ivet! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Wido den Hollander Date: Tuesday, 5 April 2022 at 12:26 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org , d...@cloudstack.apache.org , Ivet Petrova Subject: Re: CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2022 - November 14-16 Sounds good! I'll do my best to be present! (And make sure there's a bar nearby! ;-) ) Wido Op 05-04-2022 om 16:57 schreef Alex Mattioli: > Sounds amazing @Ivet Petrova > > > > > > -Original Message- > From: Daman Arora > Sent: 05 April 2022 16:51 > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: users > Subject: Re: CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2022 - November 14-16 > > Sounds like a good idea to me. > > Thanks, > Daman Arora. > > On Tue., Apr. 5, 2022, 10:45 a.m. Ivet Petrova, > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I am working on the idea for the CloudStack Collaboration Conference 2022. >> I was thinking that this time we can make it as a hybrid event and the >> end of the year - November 14-16th. >> We will choose one physical location in Europe and will also stream >> the whole event online as previous year for the people who cannot/does >> not want to travel. >> If nobody is against, I will start some organization plan. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> >> >> >>
Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17
Hi all, Given the number of open items in the milestone: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/21 I would like to propose an extension to the timeline, proposing the 25th April as freeze date for PRs inclusion. The updated timeline will be: - (3 weeks) Ongoing – 25 April 2022: Accept all bugs, issues, improvements allowed in LTS [1] - (1 week) Stabilise the 4.17 branch, accept only critical/blocker issues (if any) - End-April 2022 and onwards: Cut 4.17.0.0 RC1 and further RCs if necessary, start/conclude vote, and finish release work Please let me know if any objections. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Nicolas Vazquez Date: Tuesday, 15 March 2022 at 07:57 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17 Hi all, Given the proximity with the version 4.16.1 released this month, I would like to propose some changes to the original timeline, by extending it for a few weeks: - (3-4 weeks) Ongoing – First weeks April 2022: Accept all bugs, issues, improvements allowed in LTS [1] - (1 week) Stabilise the 4.17 branch, accept only critical/blocker issues (if any) - Mid-April 2022 and onwards: Cut 4.17.0.0 RC1 and further RCs if necessary, start/conclude vote, and finish release work Please let me know if any objections. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Nicolas Vazquez Date: Tuesday, 1 February 2022 at 11:20 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org , dev Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17 Thanks all for your support! I propose the following timelines for the 4.17.0.0 release, which is targeted for Q1/Q2 2022. - (7-8 weeks) Ongoing – Mid March 2022: Accept all bugs, issues, improvements allowed in LTS [1] - (1 week) Stabilise the 4.17 branch, accept only critical/blocker issues (if any) - End March 2022 and onwards: Cut 4.17.0.0 RC1 and further RCs if necessary, start/conclude vote, and finish release work My colleague Boris will assist me during the process for reviewing/testing/merging the PRs. You can find the open issues and PRs at the 4.17.0.0 Github milestone [2]. Ping me (@nvazquez) or Boris (@borisstoyanov) on your issues and PRs, that are to be included in 4.17.0.0. Looking forward for your support on bug fixes, reviews, tests, etc. Thanks. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/21 Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Date: Tuesday, 1 February 2022 at 08:07 To: dev Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17 +1 Thanks for volunteering again, good luck Nicolas! Regards, Suresh On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 2:02 AM Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote: > Sounds good. > Thaks, Nicolas. > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022, 19:42 Rohit Yadav wrote: > > > Sounds good to me, thanks for volunteering Nicolas. > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > From: Boris Stoyanov > > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 13:58 > > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; > > users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17 > > > > +1, I can help with triage/testing and any other business Nicolas, let me > > know if you need any additional hands. > > > > Bobby. > > > > From: Ivet Petrova > > Date: Friday, 28 January 2022, 16:11 > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17 > > Nicolas, > > Just to mention you did a great job last time! > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 28 Jan 2022, at 16:05, Nicolas Vazquez > <mailto:nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > I would like to put myself forward as the release manager for 4.17.0.0. > > > > I propose we have a window of at least 6 weeks to allow the community and > > users to test and report issues, I will propose the timeline details > soon. > > > > I hope to have your support. Please let me know if you have any thoughts > / > > comments. > > > > Regards, > > Nicolas Vazquez > > > > > > > > >
Re: VMware Template - To read from OVA or NOT
Thanks Mike, The ‘Read VM settings from OVA’ option was introduced on 4.15.0, and only on that version it was the default mode. Since 4.15.1 it was made optional, and the default mode remained the same as before 4.15.0. Regarding the root disk controller issue, we have added a fix on 4.16.1: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/5910 - would be good to verify if this solves the booting issue after setting the controller correctly Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Corey, Mike Date: Tuesday, 29 March 2022 at 08:52 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: Nicolas Vazquez Subject: RE: VMware Template - To read from OVA or NOT Thanks for the reply. Current ACS 4.16.0. Deploying template on 4.15.1 had similar results when "Read VM settings from OVA" was OFF - the OS would just spin at startup. Why I started using the Read OVA option. When the option is OFF - I manually select the controller (lsilogicsas) and nic (e1000). One thing I notice is that when the VM deploys, ACS adds 3 additional scsi controllers to the VM. I thought that could be the issue; however, I deleted the extra controllers from the VM and the OS still spins like something isn't loading right. Also, looking at the template settings, the rootdiskconntroller says lsisas1068 instead of what I selected "lsilogicsas" during template download. Like I said, I feel like I've chased this tail before which is why I ended up using the "read VM settings from OVA" setting. However, the developer of our front end web portal has me trying an image without the read OVA setting because they think it will fix an API mismatch they have. Was the "Read VM Settings from OVA" option always "default" in previous versions? In my notes, I have it was introduced in 4.15.1. Mike -Original Message- From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2022 7:03 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: VMware Template - To read from OVA or NOT [You don't often get email from nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com.invalid. Learn why this is important at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.]<http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.%5d> Hi Mike, The 'Read VM Settings from OVA' option is not mandatory, and by default the Vmware environments should not be affected if not using this feature on the templates. I have some questions, which CloudStack version are you using? In this case it would seem like the combination of controllers is not supported for the template. Were you able to deploy from the same template on previous CloudStack versions setting the same controllers? Are the controllers correctly set on vCenter? The 'Read VM settings from OVA' honors the template configuration and controllers. When deploying a VM using this option, are the disk and NIC controllers the same as the ones you want to set when not enabling the option? As a quick test, can you create a test VM using the 'Read VM settings from OVA' option, stop it and change the controllers from vCenter - would the VM boot correctly? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Corey, Mike Date: Thursday, 24 March 2022 at 13:54 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: VMware Template - To read from OVA or NOT Hi - I feel like I've asked this in the past; however, my developer colleague has me spinning my wheels trying to get his code to work against this VMware/ACS environment. I'm having trouble with deploying a VM instance using a VMware specific template when I DO NOT use the "Read VM Settings from OVA." When I don't use that setting I set the root disk controller as "lsilogicsas" and NIC to "e1000." The VM deploys however the OS never completely loads, just spins at Windows OS "Getting devices ready." Using the SAME image, with the Read OVA setting - the VM instance deploys and loads the OS without issue. Can someone from ShapeBlue or ACS verify that for VMWARE environments the "Read VM settings from OVA" IS or IS NOT required? If in theory, I should be able to deploy a VM from a template where "Read VM Settings from OVA" is OFF - what could be the issue (I assume its something identified in OVA that is not getting loaded/seen from basic ACS API). Many thanks! Mike Mike Corey Technology Senior Consultant, IT CS CTW Operation & Virtualization Service US SAP AMERICA, INC. 3999 West Chester Pike, Newtown Square, 19073 United States T +1 610 661 0905, M +1 484 274 2658, E mike.co...@sap.com [cid:image001.png@01D83F7E.500DA3D0]
Re: VMware Template - To read from OVA or NOT
Hi Mike, The ‘Read VM Settings from OVA’ option is not mandatory, and by default the Vmware environments should not be affected if not using this feature on the templates. I have some questions, which CloudStack version are you using? In this case it would seem like the combination of controllers is not supported for the template. Were you able to deploy from the same template on previous CloudStack versions setting the same controllers? Are the controllers correctly set on vCenter? The ‘Read VM settings from OVA’ honors the template configuration and controllers. When deploying a VM using this option, are the disk and NIC controllers the same as the ones you want to set when not enabling the option? As a quick test, can you create a test VM using the ‘Read VM settings from OVA’ option, stop it and change the controllers from vCenter – would the VM boot correctly? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Corey, Mike Date: Thursday, 24 March 2022 at 13:54 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: VMware Template - To read from OVA or NOT Hi – I feel like I’ve asked this in the past; however, my developer colleague has me spinning my wheels trying to get his code to work against this VMware/ACS environment. I’m having trouble with deploying a VM instance using a VMware specific template when I DO NOT use the “Read VM Settings from OVA.” When I don’t use that setting I set the root disk controller as “lsilogicsas” and NIC to “e1000.” The VM deploys however the OS never completely loads, just spins at Windows OS “Getting devices ready.” Using the SAME image, with the Read OVA setting – the VM instance deploys and loads the OS without issue. Can someone from ShapeBlue or ACS verify that for VMWARE environments the “Read VM settings from OVA” IS or IS NOT required? If in theory, I should be able to deploy a VM from a template where “Read VM Settings from OVA” is OFF – what could be the issue (I assume its something identified in OVA that is not getting loaded/seen from basic ACS API). Many thanks! Mike Mike Corey Technology Senior Consultant, IT CS CTW Operation & Virtualization Service US SAP AMERICA, INC. 3999 West Chester Pike, Newtown Square, 19073 United States T +1 610 661 0905, M +1 484 274 2658, E mike.co...@sap.com [cid:image001.png@01D83F7E.500DA3D0]
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Next PMC Chair & VP Apache CloudStack Project - Simon Weller
Congratulations Simon! And thanks Gabriel for your great work! Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Gabriel Beims Bräscher Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2022 6:55:26 AM To: users ; dev Subject: [ANNOUNCE] Next PMC Chair & VP Apache CloudStack Project - Simon Weller Hello, all CloudStack community! It gives me great pleasure to announce that the ASF board last night accepted our PMC's nomination of Simon Weller as the next PMC Chair / VP of the Apache CloudStack project. I would like to thank everyone for the support I've received over the past year. It was a great honor being the PMC Chair of this amazing project/community! To Simon, my sincere congratulations, and I wish you success in the new role! Very well deserved! Please join me in congratulating Simon, the CloudStack PMC Chair / VP. Best Regards, Gabriel Bräscher.
Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17
Hi all, Given the proximity with the version 4.16.1 released this month, I would like to propose some changes to the original timeline, by extending it for a few weeks: - (3-4 weeks) Ongoing – First weeks April 2022: Accept all bugs, issues, improvements allowed in LTS [1] - (1 week) Stabilise the 4.17 branch, accept only critical/blocker issues (if any) - Mid-April 2022 and onwards: Cut 4.17.0.0 RC1 and further RCs if necessary, start/conclude vote, and finish release work Please let me know if any objections. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Nicolas Vazquez Date: Tuesday, 1 February 2022 at 11:20 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org , dev Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17 Thanks all for your support! I propose the following timelines for the 4.17.0.0 release, which is targeted for Q1/Q2 2022. - (7-8 weeks) Ongoing – Mid March 2022: Accept all bugs, issues, improvements allowed in LTS [1] - (1 week) Stabilise the 4.17 branch, accept only critical/blocker issues (if any) - End March 2022 and onwards: Cut 4.17.0.0 RC1 and further RCs if necessary, start/conclude vote, and finish release work My colleague Boris will assist me during the process for reviewing/testing/merging the PRs. You can find the open issues and PRs at the 4.17.0.0 Github milestone [2]. Ping me (@nvazquez) or Boris (@borisstoyanov) on your issues and PRs, that are to be included in 4.17.0.0. Looking forward for your support on bug fixes, reviews, tests, etc. Thanks. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/21 Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Date: Tuesday, 1 February 2022 at 08:07 To: dev Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17 +1 Thanks for volunteering again, good luck Nicolas! Regards, Suresh On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 2:02 AM Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote: > Sounds good. > Thaks, Nicolas. > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022, 19:42 Rohit Yadav wrote: > > > Sounds good to me, thanks for volunteering Nicolas. > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > From: Boris Stoyanov > > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 13:58 > > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; > > users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17 > > > > +1, I can help with triage/testing and any other business Nicolas, let me > > know if you need any additional hands. > > > > Bobby. > > > > From: Ivet Petrova > > Date: Friday, 28 January 2022, 16:11 > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17 > > Nicolas, > > Just to mention you did a great job last time! > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 28 Jan 2022, at 16:05, Nicolas Vazquez > <mailto:nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > I would like to put myself forward as the release manager for 4.17.0.0. > > > > I propose we have a window of at least 6 weeks to allow the community and > > users to test and report issues, I will propose the timeline details > soon. > > > > I hope to have your support. Please let me know if you have any thoughts > / > > comments. > > > > Regards, > > Nicolas Vazquez > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2)
+1 (binding) Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Harikrishna Patnala Date: Wednesday, 2 March 2022 at 04:02 To: dev Cc: users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2) +1 Tested on a VMware environment with VM and volume operations on NFS and Datastore Cluster storage types and a few network operations. Thanks, Harikrishna From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 1:20 AM To: dev Cc: users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2) +1 (binding) Regards. From: Gabriel Br?scher Sent: Tuesday, March 1, 2022 9:41:25 PM To: dev Cc: users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.1.0 (RC2) +1 on continuing with RC2 Vote. On Tue, Mar 1, 2022, 17:03 Vladimir Petrov wrote: > Hi all, > > Voting +1 > > I did a lot of upgrade tests with pre-RC, RC1 and RC2 versions, using > different hypervisors and from different versions (4.11, 4.13, 4.15.2, > 4.16.0). I also tested main workflows and basic operations and haven't > found a single issue. > > Best wishes, > Vladi > > > Suresh Anaparti wrote: > > > Hi All, > > I have created a 4.16.1.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up > for testing and a vote: > > Git Branch and Commit SHA: > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.16.1.0-RC20220225T1901 > Commit: cad9332082a1f85eedc30cf547ae28224be170c2 > > Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same > location): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.16.1.0/ > > PGP release keys (signed using D6E0581ECF8A2FBE3FF6B3C9D7CEAE3A9E71D0AA): > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS > > The vote will be open until 2nd March 2022. > > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to > indicate "(binding)" with their vote? > > [ ] +1 approve > [ ] +0 no opinion > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > For users convenience, the packages from this release candidate (RC2) and > 4.16.1 systemvm templates are available here: > https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.16.1.0-RC2/ > https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.16/ > > Documentation is not published yet, but the following may be referenced > for upgrade related tests: > (there's a new 4.16.1 systemvm template to be registered prior to upgrade) > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/tree/4.16/source/upgrading/upgrade > > NOTES on the issues fixed in this RC2 release: > > (these do *NOT* require a full retest if you were testing RC1 already - > just if you were affected by these issues): > - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6017 (regression in > register template form > when select/unselect check boxes using space in keyboard) > - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6026 (affects volumes on > managed storages when > stopping or migrating a VM) > - https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/6038 (regression in SSVM > scaling down behavior, > new config 'secstorage.vm.auto.scale.down' added to control scaling down) > > > Regards, > Suresh > > > > > > > >
Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17
Thanks all for your support! I propose the following timelines for the 4.17.0.0 release, which is targeted for Q1/Q2 2022. - (7-8 weeks) Ongoing – Mid March 2022: Accept all bugs, issues, improvements allowed in LTS [1] - (1 week) Stabilise the 4.17 branch, accept only critical/blocker issues (if any) - End March 2022 and onwards: Cut 4.17.0.0 RC1 and further RCs if necessary, start/conclude vote, and finish release work My colleague Boris will assist me during the process for reviewing/testing/merging the PRs. You can find the open issues and PRs at the 4.17.0.0 Github milestone [2]. Ping me (@nvazquez) or Boris (@borisstoyanov) on your issues and PRs, that are to be included in 4.17.0.0. Looking forward for your support on bug fixes, reviews, tests, etc. Thanks. [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/LTS [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/21 Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Suresh Kumar Anaparti Date: Tuesday, 1 February 2022 at 08:07 To: dev Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17 +1 Thanks for volunteering again, good luck Nicolas! Regards, Suresh On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 2:02 AM Gabriel Beims Bräscher wrote: > Sounds good. > Thaks, Nicolas. > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022, 19:42 Rohit Yadav wrote: > > > Sounds good to me, thanks for volunteering Nicolas. > > > > > > Regards. > > > > > > From: Boris Stoyanov > > Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 13:58 > > To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; > > users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17 > > > > +1, I can help with triage/testing and any other business Nicolas, let me > > know if you need any additional hands. > > > > Bobby. > > > > From: Ivet Petrova > > Date: Friday, 28 January 2022, 16:11 > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.17 > > Nicolas, > > Just to mention you did a great job last time! > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 28 Jan 2022, at 16:05, Nicolas Vazquez > <mailto:nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: > > > > Dear All, > > > > I would like to put myself forward as the release manager for 4.17.0.0. > > > > I propose we have a window of at least 6 weeks to allow the community and > > users to test and report issues, I will propose the timeline details > soon. > > > > I hope to have your support. Please let me know if you have any thoughts > / > > comments. > > > > Regards, > > Nicolas Vazquez > > > > > > > > >
[PROPOSE] RM for 4.17
Dear All, I would like to put myself forward as the release manager for 4.17.0.0. I propose we have a window of at least 6 weeks to allow the community and users to test and report issues, I will propose the timeline details soon. I hope to have your support. Please let me know if you have any thoughts / comments. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
Re: Needed ACS billing solution
Thanks Ivan, I didn’t know Cyclops. It seems outdated but could manage to deploy the microservices and its dashboard. Could not find any documentation for the CloudStack usage integration, could you connect them? Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Ivan Kudryavtsev Date: Monday, 24 January 2022 at 00:42 To: users Cc: dev Subject: Re: Needed ACS billing solution Hi, Take a look at Cyclops (https://cyclops-billing.readthedocs.io/en/latest/). Actually, the integration with any existing billing solution can be done in days. On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 11:30 PM Saurabh Rapatwar wrote: > I guess there is no open source solution but at reasonable price you can > have the paid solution for billing, automated provisioning and support with > Stack Console ( www.stackconsole.io<http://www.stackconsole.io> ) > > On Sun, 23 Jan, 2022, 10:58 am Technology rss, < > technologyrss.m...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > *Hi all,* > > > > Please suggest to me which open source billing solution is the best for > > ACS? > > > > Thanks. Regards. > > >
[ANNOUNCE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.0.0 Release
*The Apache Software Foundation Announces Apache**®** CloudStack**®** v4.16* "In the past years, CloudStack has been proving a mature and easy-to-use platform. The released 4.16.0.0 LTS adds new features, enhancements, and bug fixes that will help tech-savy companies stay up to date." said Gabriel Brascher, Vice President of Apache CloudStack. "I'm pleased to see another innovative release of Apache CloudStack from the community. CloudStack continues to evolve both in terms of functionality, integrations and also ease of management and stability. It is great to see new integrations to major storage vendors and so many other features developed by community members from a broad range of organisations, reflecting CloudStack's increasing adoption across both service provider and enterprise organisations.”, said Giles Sirett, Chairman, CloudStack European User Group and Apache CloudStack PMC Member. Apache CloudStack 4.16.0.0 is a 4.16 LTS release with 22 major new features, and 244 enhancements and fixes since 4.15. Some of the highlights include: Additional OS Support for Management Servers and hypervisor hosts: - Support for OpenSuse - Support for Rocky Linux New vendor integrations to allow CloudStack to leverage advanced storage capabilities: - Dell EMC PowerFlex storage plugin integration - LINSTOR storage plugin integration UI Improvements: - Structured comments on objects in the UI - Custom Resource Icons to allow visual representation of most object types - The ability to perform bulk actions through the UI Enhancements to CloudStack Kubernetes Service: - Support for Kubernetes Autoscaling through the CloudStack Kubernetes provider - Kubernetes Clusters now based on System VM, giving simplified ongoing management Improved tools & management: - Granular control of dynamic scaling of VM’s CPU/RAM - Import and export of VMware virtual machines through the UI - CloudStack-setup-databases script improvement to give more stable upgrades - L2 Networks Persistent modern - mac learning mode added to network offerings - HA improvements allow a host to be marked as Degraded - New API endpoint to update pod management network IP range - New API endpoint to update VLAN IP range # Documentation The full list of new features can be found in the project release notes at https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.16.0.0/releasenotes/changes.html The CloudStack documentation includes upgrade instructions from previous versions of Apache CloudStack, and can be found at: https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/4.16.0.0/upgrading/index.html The official installation, administration and API documentation for each of the releases are available on our documentation page: https://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/ # Downloads: The official source code for the 4.16.0.0 release can be downloaded from our downloads page: https://cloudstack.apache.org/downloads.html In addition to the official source code release, individual contributors have also made convenience binaries available on the Apache CloudStack download page, and can be found at: https://download.cloudstack.org/ubuntu/dists/ https://download.cloudstack.org/centos/7/ https://download.cloudstack.org/centos/8/ https://download.cloudstack.org/suse/15 https://www.shapeblue.com/packages/ Apache CloudStack powers numerous elastic Cloud computing services, including solutions that have ranked as Gartner Magic Quadrant leaders. Highlighted in the Forrester Q4 2017 Enterprise Open Source Cloud Adoption report, Apache CloudStack "sits beneath hundreds of service provider clouds", including Fortune 5 multinational corporations. A list of known Apache CloudStack users are available at https://cloudstack.apache.org/users.html
[RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.0.0
Hi All, The vote for CloudStack 4.16.0.0 *passes* with 3 PMC + 5 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) 3 persons (Rohit, Boris, Nicolas) +1 (non binding) 5 persons (Abhishek, Suresh, Daniel, Vladimir, Marco) 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will help Ivet prepare the release announcement campaign for the 15th of November. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.0.0 (RC3)
+1 (binding) based on smoke test results and manual tests around VM operations, networks, volumes, snapshots, Kubernetes clusters Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Nicolas Vazquez Date: Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 15:41 To: users , d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.0.0 (RC3) Hi All, I have created a 4.16.0.0 release (RC3), with the following artifacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SHA: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.16.0.0-RC20211104T1414 Commit: 44c08b5acc598972b4f0af576ffdea4e2447cb41 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.16.0.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 656E1BCC8CB54F84): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open until 8th November 2021. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For users convenience, the packages from this release candidate (RC3) and 4.16.0 systemvmtemplates are available here: https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/41600-RC3/ https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.16/ Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.0.0 (RC3)
Hi All, I have created a 4.16.0.0 release (RC3), with the following artifacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SHA: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.16.0.0-RC20211104T1414 Commit: 44c08b5acc598972b4f0af576ffdea4e2447cb41 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.16.0.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 656E1BCC8CB54F84): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open until 8th November 2021. For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For users convenience, the packages from this release candidate (RC3) and 4.16.0 systemvmtemplates are available here: https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/41600-RC3/ https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.16/ Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.0.0
+1, thanks Ivet. Unfortunately a blocker was found after the voting passed. We will need to have an RC3 to fix this blocker Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Ivet Petrova Date: Friday, 29 October 2021 at 10:23 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.0.0 Yes, Rohit, correct. Technical work is out of my scope and you know the best. I am talking mainly for the official announcement and communication. Kind regards, On 29 Oct 2021, at 15:51, Rohit Yadav mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: +1 Ivet, great initiative! I think logistically it would take about a week for the RM/community to do wrap up the release with build/publish pkgs, update the website, create/publish release notes, draft announcement/blog. I suppose what you're saying is to not hold any technical work (like we still build/publish pkgs etc) but hold on marketing work around making changes on website/release notes live and doing blogs/announcements. We haven't attempted a broader campaign before on a specific date before but let's try it. Regards. From: Ivet Petrova mailto:ivet.petr...@shapeblue.com>> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2021 16:21 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org> mailto:users@cloudstack.apache.org>> Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org<mailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org> mailto:d...@cloudstack.apache.org>> Subject: Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.0.0 Hi all, Firstly congrats on the hard work and I am happy to see the new release is coming soon. I decided to share an idea here. It is great we have such a rapid development and new releases often with so much great features insight. I believe the world (inside and outside of our community) should learn more about them, when there is a release. On this point, I was wondering if we can structure a process around announcing new releases. It will be great if when we announce the release we also have the following things prepared: - Images for the social media announcements - PR article for the release - A more detailed article presenting why the new features and improvements are bringing value and talking more for use cases, customer benefits and added value I would be happy to take these at my side, but all they need some time for preparation. If you agree for the proposed process and bringing more noise around the release, is it possible to fix a release date, when we can also launch simultaneously the marketing initiatives? As all the marketing preparations will take around a week, what about doing a broader campaign on 8th of November? Kind regards, On 29 Oct 2021, at 3:59, Nicolas Vazquez mailto:nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com><mailto:nicolas.vazq...@shapeblue.com>> wrote: Hi all, The vote for CloudStack 4.16.0.0 *passes* with 3 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) 3 persons (Rohit, Gabriel, Wei) +1 (non binding) 2 persons (Daniel, Suresh) 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24-48 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.0.0 (RC2)
Thanks for reporting Abhishek, this will need to be included on RC3 Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Abhishek Kumar Date: Friday, 29 October 2021 at 10:25 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org , users Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.0.0 (RC2) Hi all, -1 I'm hitting an issue with deploying a CKS cluster in an upgraded env. 2021-10-29 12:27:30,544 ERROR [c.c.k.c.a.KubernetesClusterActionWorker] (API-Job-Executor-7:ctx-62c6bc28 job-79 ctx-f80558ff) (logid:7a78d08a) Provisioning the control VM failed in the Kubernetes cluster : c3 com.cloud.exception.InvalidParameterValueException: The template 203 is not available for use at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.createVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:3935) at com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.createAdvancedVirtualMachine(UserVmManagerImpl.java:3634) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) Deployed a 4.14.1 env with 2 clusters (2 ESXi 6.7 hosts in 1st cluster and 1 ESXi 6.7 host in 2nd cluster); centos7 MS; Advanced zone Upgraded the env to 4.16RC2 using https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/41600-RC2/ (it didn't has centos7 directory/symlink there) I did not pre-register 4.16 system VM template. After the upgrade, almost everything else worked fine except the error mentioned with CKS cluster deployment above. I've created a Github ticket for the same here, https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/5641 Other things that worked fine for me during testing: * VM lifecycle - deploy, start, stop, migrate, etc * Networks * Templates * Offerings * Infrastructure operations Regards, Abhishek From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: 25 October 2021 19:25 To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users Subject: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.0.0 (RC2) Hi All, I have created a 4.16.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SHA: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.16.0.0-RC20211025T0851 Commit: 1e070be4c9a87650f48707a44efff2796dfa802a Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.16.0.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 656E1BCC8CB54F84): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open until 28th October 2021, 16.00 CET (72h). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For users convenience, the packages from this release candidate (RC2) and 4.16.0 systemvmtemplates are available here: https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/41600-RC2/ https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.16/ Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
[RESULT][VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.0.0
Hi all, The vote for CloudStack 4.16.0.0 *passes* with 3 PMC + 2 non-PMC votes. +1 (PMC / binding) 3 persons (Rohit, Gabriel, Wei) +1 (non binding) 2 persons (Daniel, Suresh) 0 none -1 none Thanks to everyone participating. I will now prepare the release announcement to go out after 24-48 hours to give the mirrors time to catch up. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
[VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.16.0.0 (RC2)
Hi All, I have created a 4.16.0.0 release (RC2), with the following artifacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SHA: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.16.0.0-RC20211025T0851 Commit: 1e070be4c9a87650f48707a44efff2796dfa802a Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.16.0.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 656E1BCC8CB54F84): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open until 28th October 2021, 16.00 CET (72h). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) For users convenience, the packages from this release candidate (RC2) and 4.16.0 systemvmtemplates are available here: https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/41600-RC2/ https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.16/ Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
[VOTE] Apache Cloudstack 4.16.0.0 RC1
Hi All, I have created a 4.16.0.0 release (RC1) with the following artefacts up for testing and a vote: Git Branch and Commit SH: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/tree/4.16.0.0-RC20211018T1454 Commit: 506f8a8269551acb9b07b029da0f9e4fe858d150 Source release (checksums and signatures are available at the same location): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/cloudstack/4.16.0.0/ PGP release keys (signed using 656E1BCC8CB54F84): https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS The vote will be open until 21st October 2021, 21.00 CET (72h). For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate "(binding)" with their vote? [ ] +1 approve [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) 4.16.0.0 System VM templates are available from here: https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.16/ Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
Re: Dark Mode in ACS 4.15.2
Hi Mevludin, The dark mode is currently available on development mode, but not ready yet for production environments Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Mevludin Blazevic Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 10:16 AM To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Dark Mode in ACS 4.15.2 Hi all, while discovering new features and bug fixes in ACS version 4.15.2 I was wondering where to find the button for theme customization (i.e. dark mode). I think it should be found far right on the UI as a blue button in the middle of the window? For some reason I am not able to see the button neither on an updated environment nor on a fresh installation.. Mevludin
Re: 4.16.0.0 release
Hi All, These are the last outstanding items on the 4.16.0 milestone: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/16. I would like to propose/announce a code freeze date for October 10th. After this time, we are starting the stabilisation phase and no more features and general fixes will be allowed, and only critical and blocker issues will be fixed after the freeze date. Please let me know if there are any questions or concerns. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Nicolas Vazquez Sent: Monday, September 13, 2021 4:44 PM To: users ; d...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: 4.16.0.0 release Hi All, We are looking forward to cutting RC1 soon. Kindly share or ping me this week if there are any issues or pull requests that we should include in 4.16.0.0. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
4.16.0.0 release
Hi All, We are looking forward to cutting RC1 soon. Kindly share or ping me this week if there are any issues or pull requests that we should include in 4.16.0.0. Regards, Nicolas Vazquez
Re: [DISCUSS] 4.15.2.0
+1 Regards, Nicolas Vazquez From: Rohit Yadav Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2021 7:54 AM To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: [DISCUSS] 4.15.2.0 All, I want to kick a thread to discuss and gather interest from the community on doing a 4.15.2.0 release, before Nicolas (our RM) cuts 4.16.0.0 RC1 around the end of Sept '21. We can keep the scope really tight to include only important fixes, I see about 50 closed issues/PRs already on the 4.15.2.0 milestone and some 30 remaining: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/20 I'm hoping the 4.15.2.0 release can be a quick stable minor release, I can do it and any other volunteer RM may do it. Whoever does it, here's my proposal is: * Limit the scope to very specific do-able bug-fixes up to end the month - so gives us roughly 2 weeks * Cut RC1 in the first week of Sept * Assuming the RC1 would be stable enough as 4.15 branch is quite stable, worst case we've another RC2 * Conclude release work by mid or end of Sept before 4.16.0.0 RC1 is cut; so 4.15.2.0 release work doesn't cause delay for 4.16.0.0 Thoughts? Thanks and regards.
