Re: Give outgoing messages priority over incoming
Same logic also in transceiver mode. However, I thought you were talking about svn kannel. Alex's patch is a different story. It will delay receiving thread using sleep(), which can also cause ACKs on the transmitting thread to be delayed, conceivably affecting both operations at the same time. For more info on that, you need to talk to Alex. BR, Nikos On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Mohammed Saleem mohammedsl...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Nikos, Does this apply on transceiver SMPP connections on 1.4.3? coz I doubt it, I applied a patch once by Alex for the DLRs coming too early (before the message is ACKed) which lets the IO thread to sleep and waits for the DLR to get inserted into the DB, I clearly saw that when the thread sleeps, the traffic stops... Thanks Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak 2010/12/16 Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com Hi, That should not be your problem. MOs (including DLRs) run on a different thread than your MTs, even use completely different queues and structures. Even network traffic is on a seperate cable (assuming full duplex operation). The presence of one shouldn't affect the other. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: JimSG jimmy.gar...@laprensa.hn To: users@kannel.org Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 7:15 PM Subject: Give outgoing messages priority over incoming Hello, We activated the dlr a while ago and it works, but we have come with a next situation: Example: A user sends 30,000 sms and a couple of minutes later another user sends 20,000 sms, it sends a couple thousands sms but it stops because it starts receving the dlr and then it starts sending againg and than it stops to recieve and so on... Im using a dlr mask = 19 Can i give priority to outgoing messages over incoming messages? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Give-outgoing-messages-priority-over-incoming-tp30465870p30465870.html Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
unified-prefix for short codes?
is there a way to set a unified-prefix for short codes rather than handset's numbers? unified-prefix works on sender number in MOs and receiver number in MTs, but we need is a unified-prefix to be applied for receiver number in MOs and sender number in MTs (the opposite) can we accomplish this? Thanks Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak http://www.colorle.com
Re: Give outgoing messages priority over incoming
Yep, my patch is barely a workaround and it definitely impact performance, specially on transceiver mode. If you can use TX + RX instead of TRX, much better. Anyway the patch is not intended to be used under heavy load at all. Regards, Alex On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.comwrote: Same logic also in transceiver mode. However, I thought you were talking about svn kannel. Alex's patch is a different story. It will delay receiving thread using sleep(), which can also cause ACKs on the transmitting thread to be delayed, conceivably affecting both operations at the same time. For more info on that, you need to talk to Alex. BR, Nikos On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Mohammed Saleem mohammedsl...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Nikos, Does this apply on transceiver SMPP connections on 1.4.3? coz I doubt it, I applied a patch once by Alex for the DLRs coming too early (before the message is ACKed) which lets the IO thread to sleep and waits for the DLR to get inserted into the DB, I clearly saw that when the thread sleeps, the traffic stops... Thanks Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak 2010/12/16 Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com Hi, That should not be your problem. MOs (including DLRs) run on a different thread than your MTs, even use completely different queues and structures. Even network traffic is on a seperate cable (assuming full duplex operation). The presence of one shouldn't affect the other. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: JimSG jimmy.gar...@laprensa.hn To: users@kannel.org Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 7:15 PM Subject: Give outgoing messages priority over incoming Hello, We activated the dlr a while ago and it works, but we have come with a next situation: Example: A user sends 30,000 sms and a couple of minutes later another user sends 20,000 sms, it sends a couple thousands sms but it stops because it starts receving the dlr and then it starts sending againg and than it stops to recieve and so on... Im using a dlr mask = 19 Can i give priority to outgoing messages over incoming messages? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Give-outgoing-messages-priority-over-incoming-tp30465870p30465870.html Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Kannel 1.5.0 AIX 6.1.4.14
Hi, I just compiled 1.5.0 on AIX, and have the infamous Wrong or no answer to ATZ problem. I can 'cu' to tty0 no problem...I've got Siemens TC65 attached. Is there anyway I can see exactly what commands are being sent so I can try to replicate with cu? Thanks Mit freundlichen Grüßen Howard ALLISON Pensionsversicherungsanstalt Rechenzentrumsbetrieb A-1021 Wien, Friedrich-Hillegeist-Straße 1 E-Mail..: howard.alli...@pva.sozvers.at Internet: www.pensionsversicherung.at -- VERTRAULICHKEIT: Diese Nachricht ist ausschließlich für denjenigen bestimmt, an den sie adressiert ist und kann vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Falls Sie nicht der Empfänger dieser Nachricht sind, weisen wir Sie darauf hin, dass die unberechtigte Weitergabe oder Verwendung sowie das unberechtigte Verteilen oder Kopieren dieser Nachricht strikt untersagt sind. Falls Sie diese Nachricht irrtümlich erhalten haben, vernichten Sie sie bitte sofort. CONFIDENTIALITY: This message is intended only for the use of the individuality or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that any dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately destroy this message. --inline: 16525644.gif
Unicode Character Count
Hi, When sending a unicode sms, the character count is about 500-520 characters. When looking in the kannel-access log file, its showing like this: [msg:956:0051004E00650074 . (lots more after this) Is this binary encoding? Also, how come its showing as 956 characters? How many segments is this ? (to determine total message cost) Regards, J
Re: Unicode Character Count
Hi James, the message data in the log is written in hex. A single sms can contain 140 octets, when sending unicode (UCS2) each character requires two octets, so you have 70 characters per message. /Jacob On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 19:47 +0700, JAmes wrote: Hi, When sending a unicode sms, the character count is about 500-520 characters. When looking in the kannel-access log file, its showing like this: [msg:956:0051004E00650074 . (lots more after this) Is this binary encoding? Also, how come its showing as 956 characters? How many segments is this ? (to determine total message cost) Regards, J -- Apide ApS Jacob Eiler t: 2374 0486 e: jacob.ei...@apide.com w: apide.com
Asynchronous submit_sm
Hi pips, I have an issue with SMPP 3.4, I noticed my queues have been building up for a while. The operator confirms delays in sending submit_sm_resp. I noticed from the logs that kannel does not attempt to send another submit_sm and queues build up forever. Is there a way of doing asynchronous submit_sm? Perhaps a parameter that I can enforce? Kind Regards, Rapture
Re: Unicode Character Count
Unicode is represented in hex, each character takes at least 2-bytes (depends on the charset you use) in case of 2-bytes per each character like UCS2: you have 70 characters limit for the SMS part, but if the SMS has more than one part (70 characters) then each 67 characters (134 bytes) will be split into one part Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak http://www.colorle.com On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:47 PM, JAmes jam...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, When sending a unicode sms, the character count is about 500-520 characters. When looking in the kannel-access log file, its showing like this: [msg:956:0051004E00650074 . (lots more after this) Is this binary encoding? Also, how come its showing as 956 characters? How many segments is this ? (to determine total message cost) Regards, J
Re: Asynchronous submit_sm
You may need to increase the max-pending-submits but this may cause a throttling error Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak http://www.colorle.com On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Rapture supp...@ims.co.ke wrote: Hi pips, I have an issue with SMPP 3.4, I noticed my queues have been building up for a while. The operator confirms delays in sending submit_sm_resp. I noticed from the logs that kannel does not attempt to send another submit_sm and queues build up forever. Is there a way of doing asynchronous submit_sm? Perhaps a parameter that I can enforce? Kind Regards, Rapture
RE: Asynchronous submit_sm
I haven’t currently set the max-pending-submits…what does the variable do and how will this cause a throttling error? Thanks. From: Mohammed Saleem [mailto:mohammedsl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:13 PM To: Rapture Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Asynchronous submit_sm You may need to increase the max-pending-submits but this may cause a throttling error Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Rapture supp...@ims.co.ke wrote: Hi pips, I have an issue with SMPP 3.4, I noticed my queues have been building up for a while. The operator confirms delays in sending submit_sm_resp. I noticed from the logs that kannel does not attempt to send another submit_sm and queues build up forever. Is there a way of doing asynchronous submit_sm? Perhaps a parameter that I can enforce? Kind Regards, Rapture
Re: Asynchronous submit_sm
when you send a submit_sm, the message will considered pending until it receives the submit_sm_resp so if you set max-pending-submits=5 then kannel will keep sending submit_sm PDUs until there are 5 submit_sm_resp pending to arrive to kannel. see the UG for more info about the throttling error, this depends on the carrier's SMSC, some SMSCs limits throughput to a certain speed (like 50 MTs per second) or to a certain pending submits at a time, when you exceed this limit, the excess messages will get rejected by the SMSC or the IO thread will get blocked, this also depends on the SMSC implementation at the carrier's side, actually I've seen them both Talk to your provider and ask for advice about those limits Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak http://www.colorle.com On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Rapture supp...@ims.co.ke wrote: I haven’t currently set the max-pending-submits…what does the variable do and how will this cause a throttling error? Thanks. *From:* Mohammed Saleem [mailto:mohammedsl...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:13 PM *To:* Rapture *Cc:* users@kannel.org *Subject:* Re: Asynchronous submit_sm You may need to increase the max-pending-submits but this may cause a throttling error Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Rapture supp...@ims.co.ke wrote: Hi pips, I have an issue with SMPP 3.4, I noticed my queues have been building up for a while. The operator confirms delays in sending submit_sm_resp. I noticed from the logs that kannel does not attempt to send another submit_sm and queues build up forever. Is there a way of doing asynchronous submit_sm? Perhaps a parameter that I can enforce? Kind Regards, Rapture
Antwort: Kannel 1.5.0 AIX 6.1.4.14
Howard Allison howard.alli...@pva.sozvers.at Gesendet von: users-boun...@vm1.kannel.org 16.12.2010 12:09 An us...@vm1.kannel.org Kopie Thema Kannel 1.5.0 AIX 6.1.4.14 Hi, I just compiled 1.5.0 on AIX, and have the infamous Wrong or no answer to ATZ problem. I can 'cu' to tty0 no problem...I've got Siemens TC65 attached. Is there anyway I can see exactly what commands are being sent so I can try to replicate with cu? Thanks Mit freundlichen Grüßen Howard ALLISON [image removed] Pensionsversicherungsanstalt Rechenzentrumsbetrieb A-1021 Wien, Friedrich-Hillegeist-Straße 1 E-Mail..: howard.alli...@pva.sozvers.at Internet: www.pensionsversicherung.at Please ignore - the AIX box just absolutely wanted 38400 for some reason. Now I'm back to the same old 'ERROR: Error reading from fd' error on AIX, so it's back to Linux. sigh. -- VERTRAULICHKEIT: Diese Nachricht ist ausschließlich für denjenigen bestimmt, an den sie adressiert ist und kann vertrauliche Informationen enthalten. Falls Sie nicht der Empfänger dieser Nachricht sind, weisen wir Sie darauf hin, dass die unberechtigte Weitergabe oder Verwendung sowie das unberechtigte Verteilen oder Kopieren dieser Nachricht strikt untersagt sind. Falls Sie diese Nachricht irrtümlich erhalten haben, vernichten Sie sie bitte sofort. CONFIDENTIALITY: This message is intended only for the use of the individuality or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that any dissemination, distribution, use or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you received this message in error, please immediately destroy this message. --
RE: Asynchronous submit_sm
Thanks Saleem, I have set the max-pending-submits to 10 per SMSC connection and my limit on the SMSC side is 100MTs per second. Is there a ceiling to the max-pending-submits that one can set ie can I set it to say … 200? Thanks again. From: Mohammed Saleem [mailto:mohammedsl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:38 PM To: Rapture Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Asynchronous submit_sm when you send a submit_sm, the message will considered pending until it receives the submit_sm_resp so if you set max-pending-submits=5 then kannel will keep sending submit_sm PDUs until there are 5 submit_sm_resp pending to arrive to kannel. see the UG for more info about the throttling error, this depends on the carrier's SMSC, some SMSCs limits throughput to a certain speed (like 50 MTs per second) or to a certain pending submits at a time, when you exceed this limit, the excess messages will get rejected by the SMSC or the IO thread will get blocked, this also depends on the SMSC implementation at the carrier's side, actually I've seen them both Talk to your provider and ask for advice about those limits Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Rapture supp...@ims.co.ke wrote: I haven’t currently set the max-pending-submits…what does the variable do and how will this cause a throttling error? Thanks. From: Mohammed Saleem [mailto:mohammedsl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:13 PM To: Rapture Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Asynchronous submit_sm You may need to increase the max-pending-submits but this may cause a throttling error Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Rapture supp...@ims.co.ke wrote: Hi pips, I have an issue with SMPP 3.4, I noticed my queues have been building up for a while. The operator confirms delays in sending submit_sm_resp. I noticed from the logs that kannel does not attempt to send another submit_sm and queues build up forever. Is there a way of doing asynchronous submit_sm? Perhaps a parameter that I can enforce? Kind Regards, Rapture
Re: Asynchronous submit_sm
This depends on the SMSC, one of my SMPP connections is set to 30, others are set to 5, while another connection is balanced to 3 connections each one has a max-pensing-submits=25 (75 in total) Try to increase it and monitor the delivery of the messages, make sure there is no drops and define your real limits. By the way, the default max-pending-submits is 10 Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak http://www.colorle.com On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Rapture supp...@ims.co.ke wrote: Thanks Saleem, I have set the max-pending-submits to 10 per SMSC connection and my limit on the SMSC side is 100MTs per second. Is there a ceiling to the max-pending-submits that one can set ie can I set it to say … 200? Thanks again. *From:* Mohammed Saleem [mailto:mohammedsl...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:38 PM *To:* Rapture *Cc:* users@kannel.org *Subject:* Re: Asynchronous submit_sm when you send a submit_sm, the message will considered pending until it receives the submit_sm_resp so if you set max-pending-submits=5 then kannel will keep sending submit_sm PDUs until there are 5 submit_sm_resp pending to arrive to kannel. see the UG for more info about the throttling error, this depends on the carrier's SMSC, some SMSCs limits throughput to a certain speed (like 50 MTs per second) or to a certain pending submits at a time, when you exceed this limit, the excess messages will get rejected by the SMSC or the IO thread will get blocked, this also depends on the SMSC implementation at the carrier's side, actually I've seen them both Talk to your provider and ask for advice about those limits Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Rapture supp...@ims.co.ke wrote: I haven’t currently set the max-pending-submits…what does the variable do and how will this cause a throttling error? Thanks. *From:* Mohammed Saleem [mailto:mohammedsl...@gmail.com] *Sent:* Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:13 PM *To:* Rapture *Cc:* users@kannel.org *Subject:* Re: Asynchronous submit_sm You may need to increase the max-pending-submits but this may cause a throttling error Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Rapture supp...@ims.co.ke wrote: Hi pips, I have an issue with SMPP 3.4, I noticed my queues have been building up for a while. The operator confirms delays in sending submit_sm_resp. I noticed from the logs that kannel does not attempt to send another submit_sm and queues build up forever. Is there a way of doing asynchronous submit_sm? Perhaps a parameter that I can enforce? Kind Regards, Rapture
RE: Asynchronous submit_sm
Thanks man. Seems to be working now. I think I will set it to 50 to be safe. And a good thing is the operator has admitted the delay of resp but messages get delivered anyway. Regards, Rapture From: Mohammed Saleem [mailto:mohammedsl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 5:03 PM To: Rapture Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Asynchronous submit_sm This depends on the SMSC, one of my SMPP connections is set to 30, others are set to 5, while another connection is balanced to 3 connections each one has a max-pensing-submits=25 (75 in total) Try to increase it and monitor the delivery of the messages, make sure there is no drops and define your real limits. By the way, the default max-pending-submits is 10 Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Rapture supp...@ims.co.ke wrote: Thanks Saleem, I have set the max-pending-submits to 10 per SMSC connection and my limit on the SMSC side is 100MTs per second. Is there a ceiling to the max-pending-submits that one can set ie can I set it to say … 200? Thanks again. From: Mohammed Saleem [mailto:mohammedsl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:38 PM To: Rapture Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Asynchronous submit_sm when you send a submit_sm, the message will considered pending until it receives the submit_sm_resp so if you set max-pending-submits=5 then kannel will keep sending submit_sm PDUs until there are 5 submit_sm_resp pending to arrive to kannel. see the UG for more info about the throttling error, this depends on the carrier's SMSC, some SMSCs limits throughput to a certain speed (like 50 MTs per second) or to a certain pending submits at a time, when you exceed this limit, the excess messages will get rejected by the SMSC or the IO thread will get blocked, this also depends on the SMSC implementation at the carrier's side, actually I've seen them both Talk to your provider and ask for advice about those limits Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Rapture supp...@ims.co.ke wrote: I haven’t currently set the max-pending-submits…what does the variable do and how will this cause a throttling error? Thanks. From: Mohammed Saleem [mailto:mohammedsl...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:13 PM To: Rapture Cc: users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Asynchronous submit_sm You may need to increase the max-pending-submits but this may cause a throttling error Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Rapture supp...@ims.co.ke wrote: Hi pips, I have an issue with SMPP 3.4, I noticed my queues have been building up for a while. The operator confirms delays in sending submit_sm_resp. I noticed from the logs that kannel does not attempt to send another submit_sm and queues build up forever. Is there a way of doing asynchronous submit_sm? Perhaps a parameter that I can enforce? Kind Regards, Rapture
Re: Bearerbox dont send sms Nokia 7110
can you add log-file = /var/log/kannel/modem.log log-level = 0 to your smsc at config and post log? in your logs we can't see much. Also it would be better if you do set log-level to 0 to get debug info. Regards Alvaro |-| Envíe y Reciba Datos y mensajes de Texto (SMS) hacia y desde cualquier celular y Nextel en el Perú, México y en mas de 180 paises. Use aplicaciones 2 vias via SMS y GPRS online Visitenos en www.perusms.NET www.smsglobal.com.mx y www.pravcom.com On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Martin mazgac...@gmx.at wrote: Here is the config again: Kannel.conf group = core admin-port = 13000 smsbox-port = 13001 admin-password = claudia #admin-deny-ip = #admin-allow-ip = *.*.*.* wdp-interface-name = * log-file = /var/log/kannel/bearerbox.log #box-deny-ip = box-allow-ip = *.*.*.* group = smsc smsc = at smsc-id = 7110 modemtype = nokiaphone device = /dev/ttyS0 speed = 19200 pin = 6220 group = smsbox bearerbox-host = localhost sendsms-port = 13013 global-sender = +431 #sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +- log-file = /var/log/kannel/smsbox.log log-level = 4 #access-log = kannel.access group = sendsms-user username = playsms password = playsms user-allow-ip = *.*.*.* max-messages=4 # Default service. group = sms-service keyword = default text = No services defined group = modems id = siemens_tc35 name = Siemens TC35 detect-string = coM #init-string = AT+CNMI=1,2,0,1,1 init-string = AT+CMEE=2 speed = 19200 no-pin = true enable-hwhs = AT\\Q3 need-sleep = true group = modems id = nokiaphone name = Nokia Phone detect-string = Nokia Mobile Phone need-sleep = true keepalive-cmd = AT+CBC;+CSQ enable-mms = true I hope the setup with cfg is correct. Regards Martin -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Montag, 13. Dezember 2010 22:56 An: Martin; us...@vm1.kannel.org Betreff: Re: Bearerbox dont send sms Nokia 7110 Hi, Please post your configuration. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Martin To: users@kannel.org Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 4:01 PM Subject: Bearerbox dont send sms Nokia 7110 Hi! I΄ve a Nokia 7110 Phone setup with kannel. I startet smsbox and I can send the sms via http. Smsbox gives the sms to bearbox and get the message: Status: 202 Answer: Sent. But bearerbox wont send the sms. Here are the Logfiles: Smsbox: 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] INFO: Debug_lvl = -1, log_file = none, log_lvl = 0 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] DEBUG: Kannel smsbox version `1.4.1'. Build `Oct 17 2006 02:55:06', compiler `4.1.2 20061007 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-16)'. System Linux, release 2.6.26-2-686, version #1 SMP Thu Nov 25 01:53:57 UTC 2010, machine i686. Hostname server01.raab.domain.com, IP 192.168.3.2. Libxml version 2.6.26. Using OpenSSL 0.9.8c 05 Sep 2006. Compiled with MySQL 5.0.24a, using MySQL 5.0.51a. Using native malloc. 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] INFO: Starting to log to file /var/log/kannel/smsbox.log level 4 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] INFO: Added logfile `/var/log/kannel/smsbox.log' with level `4'. 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] INFO: Service global sender set as '+431' 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] INFO: HTTP: Opening server at port 13013. 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 1 (gwlib/fdset.c:poller) 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [1] DEBUG: Thread 1 (gwlib/fdset.c:poller) maps to pid 3267. 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 2 (gwlib/http.c:server_thread) 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [2] DEBUG: Thread 2 (gwlib/http.c:server_thread) maps to pid 3267. 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] INFO: Set up send sms service at port 13013 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 3 (gw/smsbox.c:sendsms_thread) 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [3] DEBUG: Thread 3 (gw/smsbox.c:sendsms_thread) maps to pid 3267. 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] DEBUG: -- 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] DEBUG: Kannel smsbox version 1.4.1 starting 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 4 (gw/smsbox.c:obey_request_thread) 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [4] DEBUG: Thread 4 (gw/smsbox.c:obey_request_thread) maps to pid 3267. 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 5 (gw/smsbox.c:url_result_thread) 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [5] DEBUG: Thread 5 (gw/smsbox.c:url_result_thread) maps to pid 3267. 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 6 (gw/smsbox.c:http_queue_thread) 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [6] DEBUG: Thread 6 (gw/smsbox.c:http_queue_thread) maps to pid 3267. 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] INFO: Connected to bearerbox at localhost port 13001. 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [0] DEBUG: Started thread 7 (gw/heartbeat.c:heartbeat_thread) 2010-12-12 14:09:59 [3267] [7] DEBUG: Thread 7
Re: Give outgoing messages priority over incoming
Hi, Don't understand. Please rephrase. What is your other problem? BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: Jimmy Samuel Garcia Hynds To: Nikos Balkanas ; Mohammed Saleem Cc: users@kannel.org Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:49 PM Subject: RE: Give outgoing messages priority over incoming Hello, Thanks for the reply. You I have a different problem, any idea what it is? Do a have to change something in my conf file? From: Nikos Balkanas [mailto:nbalka...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 3:27 AM To: Mohammed Saleem Cc: Jimmy Samuel Garcνa Hynds; users@kannel.org Subject: Re: Give outgoing messages priority over incoming Same logic also in transceiver mode. However, I thought you were talking about svn kannel. Alex's patch is a different story. It will delay receiving thread using sleep(), which can also cause ACKs on the transmitting thread to be delayed, conceivably affecting both operations at the same time. For more info on that, you need to talk to Alex. BR, Nikos On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Mohammed Saleem mohammedsl...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Nikos, Does this apply on transceiver SMPP connections on 1.4.3? coz I doubt it, I applied a patch once by Alex for the DLRs coming too early (before the message is ACKed) which lets the IO thread to sleep and waits for the DLR to get inserted into the DB, I clearly saw that when the thread sleeps, the traffic stops... Thanks Best Regards, Mohammed M I Sleem http://www.abusleem.net - Personal blog http://www.freakle.com - The Search Freak 2010/12/16 Nikos Balkanas nbalka...@gmail.com Hi, That should not be your problem. MOs (including DLRs) run on a different thread than your MTs, even use completely different queues and structures. Even network traffic is on a seperate cable (assuming full duplex operation). The presence of one shouldn't affect the other. BR, Nikos - Original Message - From: JimSG jimmy.gar...@laprensa.hn To: users@kannel.org Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 7:15 PM Subject: Give outgoing messages priority over incoming Hello, We activated the dlr a while ago and it works, but we have come with a next situation: Example: A user sends 30,000 sms and a couple of minutes later another user sends 20,000 sms, it sends a couple thousands sms but it stops because it starts receving the dlr and then it starts sending againg and than it stops to recieve and so on... Im using a dlr mask = 19 Can i give priority to outgoing messages over incoming messages? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Give-outgoing-messages-priority-over-incoming-tp30465870p30465870.html Sent from the Kannel - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
