Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
Hey Willy, Any entry level benchmark? On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Willy Mularto sangpr...@gmail.com wrote: Server hardware configuration 1K message/second/SMSC? Simply buy the highest configuration that your fund can buy :) On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, What will be minimum requirements for getting 1000 message/second transfered from kannel to particular smsc? What will be server hardware configuration? Ammar Ali FRAMP Technologies, Pune (Maharashtra)
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
Kannel can process upto 100,000 SMSes in a minute based on your connection speed to the SMSC operator and your scripts. Also it will depend on the allowed limit per second by the MNO. Best Regards, *Bendon Murgor *: Systems Engineer/IT Systems Auditor. *Phone*: Kenya: +254-720529868 Twitter: @bendonmurgor http://twitter.com/bendonmurgor On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:23 AM, MOSES KARIUKI kariuk...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Willy, Any entry level benchmark? On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Willy Mularto sangpr...@gmail.com wrote: Server hardware configuration 1K message/second/SMSC? Simply buy the highest configuration that your fund can buy :) On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, What will be minimum requirements for getting 1000 message/second transfered from kannel to particular smsc? What will be server hardware configuration? Ammar Ali FRAMP Technologies, Pune (Maharashtra)
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
*Hi **Willy Mularto,* I have so many confusion regarding this. So can you describe any particular hardware configuration for getting this sms traffic? Thanks in advance. Ammar Ali On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Murgor Bendon bendonmur...@gmail.com wrote: Kannel can process upto 100,000 SMSes in a minute based on your connection speed to the SMSC operator and your scripts. Also it will depend on the allowed limit per second by the MNO. Best Regards, *Bendon Murgor *: Systems Engineer/IT Systems Auditor. *Phone*: Kenya: +254-720529868 Twitter: @bendonmurgor http://twitter.com/bendonmurgor On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:23 AM, MOSES KARIUKI kariuk...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Willy, Any entry level benchmark? On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Willy Mularto sangpr...@gmail.com wrote: Server hardware configuration 1K message/second/SMSC? Simply buy the highest configuration that your fund can buy :) On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, What will be minimum requirements for getting 1000 message/second transfered from kannel to particular smsc? What will be server hardware configuration? Ammar Ali FRAMP Technologies, Pune (Maharashtra)
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
Dear Ammar, As per Kannel part you can send only 300 to 500 SMS in a second, if you want to send 1000 SMS in a second use twice setup for the same and hardware case Kannel not require high configuration server. If you have used 4 GB RAM as well as 8 Core you will send the 300 to 500 TPS in a second. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: *Hi **Willy Mularto,* I have so many confusion regarding this. So can you describe any particular hardware configuration for getting this sms traffic? Thanks in advance. Ammar Ali On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Murgor Bendon bendonmur...@gmail.com wrote: Kannel can process upto 100,000 SMSes in a minute based on your connection speed to the SMSC operator and your scripts. Also it will depend on the allowed limit per second by the MNO. Best Regards, *Bendon Murgor *: Systems Engineer/IT Systems Auditor. *Phone*: Kenya: +254-720529868 Twitter: @bendonmurgor http://twitter.com/bendonmurgor On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:23 AM, MOSES KARIUKI kariuk...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Willy, Any entry level benchmark? On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Willy Mularto sangpr...@gmail.com wrote: Server hardware configuration 1K message/second/SMSC? Simply buy the highest configuration that your fund can buy :) On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, What will be minimum requirements for getting 1000 message/second transfered from kannel to particular smsc? What will be server hardware configuration? Ammar Ali FRAMP Technologies, Pune (Maharashtra)
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
Hello Currently, I have 4 GB RAM, Intel 24 Core Processor and 120 GB HDD but I'm not getting this TPS (300-500) in a second. Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Dec 31 2014 18:29:22', compiler `4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11)'. System Linux, release 2.6.32-042stab094.7, version #1 SMP Wed Oct 22 12:43:21 MSK 2014, machine x86_64. Hostname localhost, IP 192.168.1.1. Libxml version 2.7.6. Using OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013. Compiled with MySQL 5.5.40, using MySQL 5.6.22. Using native malloc. One more thing sometimes I'm getting this TPS but next time It has been decreased and reached at 100-200 TPS in a second. Can you suggest me where the problem in my whole system. This is my whole setup: [Bearerbox]-[SQLBox]-[SMSBox][Fake SMSC (Multiple)] *Configurations:* *Kannel.conf* # Single Group CORE group = core admin-port = 13000 admin-port-ssl=no admin-password = *** status-password = *** admin-deny-ip=*.*.*.* admin-allow-ip=*.*.*.* smsbox-interface =127.0.0.1 smsbox-port = 13001 smsbox-port-ssl=no log-file = kannel.log log-level = 0 access-log = access.access dlr-storage = internal sms-incoming-queue-limit = -1 sms-outgoing-queue-limit = 100 smsbox-max-pending = 100 sms-resend-freq = 60 sms-resend-retry = -1 # Single Group smsbox group = smsbox smsbox-id = mysmsbox bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1 bearerbox-port = 13001 sendsms-port = 13010 log-file = smsbox.log log-level = 0 access-log=saccess.access sendsms-chars = 0123456789+ # Multi Group SMSC group = smsc smsc = fake smsc-id = smsc1 host=localhost port = 10001 throughput=100.00 connect-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 reroute-dlr=true log-file=mysmsc1.log log-level=0 allowed-smsc-id=smsc1 denied-smsc-id=smsc2 group = smsc smsc = fake smsc-id = smsc2 host=localhost port = 10002 throughput=5000.00 connect-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 reroute-dlr=true log-file=mysmsc2.log log-level=0 allowed-smsc-id=smsc2 denied-smsc-id=smsc1 # Multi Group smsbox-route group = smsbox-route smsbox-id = mysmsbox smsc-id = smsc1 group = smsbox-route smsbox-id = mysmsbox smsc-id = smsc2 # Multi Group sms-service group = sms-service keyword = default text = No service specified accept-x-kannel-headers = true concatenation = true catch-all = true # Multi Group sendsms-user group = sendsms-user name = mysendsmsuser1 username = tester1 password = tester1 max-messages=10 *sqlbox.conf* # SQLBox Configuraton group = sqlbox id = sqlbox-db smsbox-id = mysqlbox global-sender = bearerbox-host = localhost bearerbox-port = 13001 smsbox-port = 13002 smsbox-port-ssl = false sql-log-table = sent_sms sql-insert-table = send_sms log-file = sqlbox.log log-level = 0 # Example MYSQL Connection group = mysql-connection id = sqlbox-db host=127.0.0.1 port = 3306 username = ** password = ** database = ** max-connections = 10 Currently I'm connecting Fake SMSC through SSH from my computer. Is there any problem? Thanks in advance. Ammar Ali On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:47 PM, John alero johnale...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Ammar, As per Kannel part you can send only 300 to 500 SMS in a second, if you want to send 1000 SMS in a second use twice setup for the same and hardware case Kannel not require high configuration server. If you have used 4 GB RAM as well as 8 Core you will send the 300 to 500 TPS in a second. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: *Hi **Willy Mularto,* I have so many confusion regarding this. So can you describe any particular hardware configuration for getting this sms traffic? Thanks in advance. Ammar Ali On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Murgor Bendon bendonmur...@gmail.com wrote: Kannel can process upto 100,000 SMSes in a minute based on your connection speed to the SMSC operator and your scripts. Also it will depend on the allowed limit per second by the MNO. Best Regards, *Bendon Murgor *: Systems Engineer/IT Systems Auditor. *Phone*: Kenya: +254-720529868 Twitter: @bendonmurgor http://twitter.com/bendonmurgor On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:23 AM, MOSES KARIUKI kariuk...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Willy, Any entry level benchmark? On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Willy Mularto sangpr...@gmail.com wrote: Server hardware configuration 1K message/second/SMSC? Simply buy the highest configuration that your fund can buy :) On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, What will be minimum requirements for getting 1000 message/second transfered from kannel to particular smsc? What will be server hardware configuration? Ammar Ali FRAMP Technologies, Pune (Maharashtra)
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
Hi Then specs you have is more than enough to send even 10k SMS / second with correct configurations. But the bottleneck is the network speed and the allowed TPS from the operator. On Jan 16, 2015 1:40 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Currently, I have 4 GB RAM, Intel 24 Core Processor and 120 GB HDD but I'm not getting this TPS (300-500) in a second. Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Dec 31 2014 18:29:22', compiler `4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11)'. System Linux, release 2.6.32-042stab094.7, version #1 SMP Wed Oct 22 12:43:21 MSK 2014, machine x86_64. Hostname localhost, IP 192.168.1.1. Libxml version 2.7.6. Using OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013. Compiled with MySQL 5.5.40, using MySQL 5.6.22. Using native malloc. One more thing sometimes I'm getting this TPS but next time It has been decreased and reached at 100-200 TPS in a second. Can you suggest me where the problem in my whole system. This is my whole setup: [Bearerbox]-[SQLBox]-[SMSBox][Fake SMSC (Multiple)] *Configurations:* *Kannel.conf* # Single Group CORE group = core admin-port = 13000 admin-port-ssl=no admin-password = *** status-password = *** admin-deny-ip=*.*.*.* admin-allow-ip=*.*.*.* smsbox-interface =127.0.0.1 smsbox-port = 13001 smsbox-port-ssl=no log-file = kannel.log log-level = 0 access-log = access.access dlr-storage = internal sms-incoming-queue-limit = -1 sms-outgoing-queue-limit = 100 smsbox-max-pending = 100 sms-resend-freq = 60 sms-resend-retry = -1 # Single Group smsbox group = smsbox smsbox-id = mysmsbox bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1 bearerbox-port = 13001 sendsms-port = 13010 log-file = smsbox.log log-level = 0 access-log=saccess.access sendsms-chars = 0123456789+ # Multi Group SMSC group = smsc smsc = fake smsc-id = smsc1 host=localhost port = 10001 throughput=100.00 connect-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 reroute-dlr=true log-file=mysmsc1.log log-level=0 allowed-smsc-id=smsc1 denied-smsc-id=smsc2 group = smsc smsc = fake smsc-id = smsc2 host=localhost port = 10002 throughput=5000.00 connect-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 reroute-dlr=true log-file=mysmsc2.log log-level=0 allowed-smsc-id=smsc2 denied-smsc-id=smsc1 # Multi Group smsbox-route group = smsbox-route smsbox-id = mysmsbox smsc-id = smsc1 group = smsbox-route smsbox-id = mysmsbox smsc-id = smsc2 # Multi Group sms-service group = sms-service keyword = default text = No service specified accept-x-kannel-headers = true concatenation = true catch-all = true # Multi Group sendsms-user group = sendsms-user name = mysendsmsuser1 username = tester1 password = tester1 max-messages=10 *sqlbox.conf* # SQLBox Configuraton group = sqlbox id = sqlbox-db smsbox-id = mysqlbox global-sender = bearerbox-host = localhost bearerbox-port = 13001 smsbox-port = 13002 smsbox-port-ssl = false sql-log-table = sent_sms sql-insert-table = send_sms log-file = sqlbox.log log-level = 0 # Example MYSQL Connection group = mysql-connection id = sqlbox-db host=127.0.0.1 port = 3306 username = ** password = ** database = ** max-connections = 10 Currently I'm connecting Fake SMSC through SSH from my computer. Is there any problem? Thanks in advance. Ammar Ali On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:47 PM, John alero johnale...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Ammar, As per Kannel part you can send only 300 to 500 SMS in a second, if you want to send 1000 SMS in a second use twice setup for the same and hardware case Kannel not require high configuration server. If you have used 4 GB RAM as well as 8 Core you will send the 300 to 500 TPS in a second. On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: *Hi **Willy Mularto,* I have so many confusion regarding this. So can you describe any particular hardware configuration for getting this sms traffic? Thanks in advance. Ammar Ali On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Murgor Bendon bendonmur...@gmail.com wrote: Kannel can process upto 100,000 SMSes in a minute based on your connection speed to the SMSC operator and your scripts. Also it will depend on the allowed limit per second by the MNO. Best Regards, *Bendon Murgor *: Systems Engineer/IT Systems Auditor. *Phone*: Kenya: +254-720529868 Twitter: @bendonmurgor http://twitter.com/bendonmurgor On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:23 AM, MOSES KARIUKI kariuk...@gmail.com wrote: Hey Willy, Any entry level benchmark? On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Willy Mularto sangpr...@gmail.com wrote: Server hardware configuration 1K message/second/SMSC? Simply buy the highest configuration that your fund can buy :) On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, What will be minimum requirements for getting 1000 message/second transfered from kannel to particular smsc? What will be server hardware configuration? Ammar
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
Hey, If you’re attempting to optimise the solution, you’ll probably want to look at a testbed. Check out https://github.com/twitter/cloudhopper-smpp which is a Java SMPP implementation. I use this and on my 2012 Macbook Pro (2.6ghz i7/8GB RAM/512GB SSD) I get 4.8k submit/sec over 10 sessons when I use Netty 6. Perhaps you can setup another box using the ch-smpp impl for listening (they’ve got performance code/configuration examples in the test/../demo dirs, and have your Kannel submit to it. On the configuration you currently have, you should expect 200-300 msg/sec using Kannel, I’ve never seen it submit much faster than that but admittedly I find understanding Java code a bit easier so I work with ch-smpp more now. Cheers, Christopher Burke http://simulity.com Office: +44 (0) 1248 679 281 Fax: +44 (0) 1248 660 323 Skype:krslynx UK Unit 8, Ash Court, Parc Menai, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 4DF, Wales, UK Malaysia Level 30, The Gardens North Tower, Mid Valley City, Lingkaran Syed Putra, 59200, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia NOTICE: This message contains privileged confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Simulity Labs immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of Simulity Labs On 16 January 2015 at 11:13:34, Mohammed Saleem (mohammedsl...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi Then specs you have is more than enough to send even 10k SMS / second with correct configurations. But the bottleneck is the network speed and the allowed TPS from the operator. On Jan 16, 2015 1:40 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Currently, I have 4 GB RAM, Intel 24 Core Processor and 120 GB HDD but I'm not getting this TPS (300-500) in a second. Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Dec 31 2014 18:29:22', compiler `4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11)'. System Linux, release 2.6.32-042stab094.7, version #1 SMP Wed Oct 22 12:43:21 MSK 2014, machine x86_64. Hostname localhost, IP 192.168.1.1. Libxml version 2.7.6. Using OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013. Compiled with MySQL 5.5.40, using MySQL 5.6.22. Using native malloc. One more thing sometimes I'm getting this TPS but next time It has been decreased and reached at 100-200 TPS in a second. Can you suggest me where the problem in my whole system. This is my whole setup: [Bearerbox]-[SQLBox]-[SMSBox][Fake SMSC (Multiple)] Configurations: Kannel.conf # Single Group CORE group = core admin-port = 13000 admin-port-ssl=no admin-password = *** status-password = *** admin-deny-ip=*.*.*.* admin-allow-ip=*.*.*.* smsbox-interface =127.0.0.1 smsbox-port = 13001 smsbox-port-ssl=no log-file = kannel.log log-level = 0 access-log = access.access dlr-storage = internal sms-incoming-queue-limit = -1 sms-outgoing-queue-limit = 100 smsbox-max-pending = 100 sms-resend-freq = 60 sms-resend-retry = -1 # Single Group smsbox group = smsbox smsbox-id = mysmsbox bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1 bearerbox-port = 13001 sendsms-port = 13010 log-file = smsbox.log log-level = 0 access-log=saccess.access sendsms-chars = 0123456789+ # Multi Group SMSC group = smsc smsc = fake smsc-id = smsc1 host=localhost port = 10001 throughput=100.00 connect-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 reroute-dlr=true log-file=mysmsc1.log log-level=0 allowed-smsc-id=smsc1 denied-smsc-id=smsc2 group = smsc smsc = fake smsc-id = smsc2 host=localhost port = 10002 throughput=5000.00 connect-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 reroute-dlr=true log-file=mysmsc2.log log-level=0 allowed-smsc-id=smsc2 denied-smsc-id=smsc1 # Multi Group smsbox-route group = smsbox-route smsbox-id = mysmsbox smsc-id = smsc1 group = smsbox-route smsbox-id = mysmsbox smsc-id = smsc2 # Multi Group sms-service group = sms-service keyword = default text = No service specified accept-x-kannel-headers = true concatenation = true catch-all = true # Multi Group sendsms-user group = sendsms-user name = mysendsmsuser1 username = tester1 password = tester1 max-messages=10 sqlbox.conf # SQLBox Configuraton group = sqlbox id = sqlbox-db smsbox-id = mysqlbox global-sender = bearerbox-host = localhost bearerbox-port = 13001 smsbox-port = 13002 smsbox-port-ssl = false sql-log-table = sent_sms sql-insert-table = send_sms log-file = sqlbox.log log-level = 0 # Example MYSQL Connection group = mysql-connection id = sqlbox-db host=127.0.0.1 port = 3306 username = ** password = ** database = ** max-connections = 10 Currently I'm connecting Fake SMSC through SSH from my computer. Is there any problem? Thanks in advance. Ammar Ali On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:47 PM, John alero johnale...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Ammar, As per Kannel part you can send only 300 to
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
Hello Everyone, I had started kannel sms gateway before past 2 days. When I was started kannel then tested my application, it shows me 500-800 messages second speed but now I'm getting 200-300 Max messages/second. And the main problem is that it is not increased above 300. Can you suggest me that what is the main bottleneck in whole system setup. Because currently I'm connecting Fake SMSC connections. Thanks in advance *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Christopher Burke christopher.bu...@simulity.com wrote: Hey, If you’re attempting to optimise the solution, you’ll probably want to look at a testbed. Check out https://github.com/twitter/cloudhopper-smpp which is a Java SMPP implementation. I use this and on my 2012 Macbook Pro (2.6ghz i7/8GB RAM/512GB SSD) I get 4.8k submit/sec over 10 sessons when I use Netty 6. Perhaps you can setup another box using the ch-smpp impl for listening (they’ve got performance code/configuration examples in the test/../demo dirs, and have your Kannel submit to it. On the configuration you currently have, you should expect 200-300 msg/sec using Kannel, I’ve never seen it submit much faster than that but admittedly I find understanding Java code a bit easier so I work with ch-smpp more now. Cheers, *Christopher Burke*http://simulity.com Office: +44 (0) 1248 679 281 Fax: +44 (0) 1248 660 323 Skype:krslynx *UK*Unit 8, Ash Court, Parc Menai, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 4DF, Wales, UK *Malaysia*Level 30, The Gardens North Tower, Mid Valley City, Lingkaran Syed Putra, 59200, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia NOTICE: This message contains privileged confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Simulity Labs immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of Simulity Labs On 16 January 2015 at 11:13:34, Mohammed Saleem (mohammedsl...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi Then specs you have is more than enough to send even 10k SMS / second with correct configurations. But the bottleneck is the network speed and the allowed TPS from the operator. On Jan 16, 2015 1:40 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Currently, I have 4 GB RAM, Intel 24 Core Processor and 120 GB HDD but I'm not getting this TPS (300-500) in a second. Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Dec 31 2014 18:29:22', compiler `4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11)'. System Linux, release 2.6.32-042stab094.7, version #1 SMP Wed Oct 22 12:43:21 MSK 2014, machine x86_64. Hostname localhost, IP 192.168.1.1. Libxml version 2.7.6. Using OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013. Compiled with MySQL 5.5.40, using MySQL 5.6.22. Using native malloc. One more thing sometimes I'm getting this TPS but next time It has been decreased and reached at 100-200 TPS in a second. Can you suggest me where the problem in my whole system. This is my whole setup: [Bearerbox]-[SQLBox]-[SMSBox][Fake SMSC (Multiple)] *Configurations:* *Kannel.conf* # Single Group CORE group = core admin-port = 13000 admin-port-ssl=no admin-password = *** status-password = *** admin-deny-ip=*.*.*.* admin-allow-ip=*.*.*.* smsbox-interface =127.0.0.1 smsbox-port = 13001 smsbox-port-ssl=no log-file = kannel.log log-level = 0 access-log = access.access dlr-storage = internal sms-incoming-queue-limit = -1 sms-outgoing-queue-limit = 100 smsbox-max-pending = 100 sms-resend-freq = 60 sms-resend-retry = -1 # Single Group smsbox group = smsbox smsbox-id = mysmsbox bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1 bearerbox-port = 13001 sendsms-port = 13010 log-file = smsbox.log log-level = 0 access-log=saccess.access sendsms-chars = 0123456789+ # Multi Group SMSC group = smsc smsc = fake smsc-id = smsc1 host=localhost port = 10001 throughput=100.00 connect-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 reroute-dlr=true log-file=mysmsc1.log log-level=0 allowed-smsc-id=smsc1 denied-smsc-id=smsc2 group = smsc smsc = fake smsc-id = smsc2 host=localhost port = 10002 throughput=5000.00 connect-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 reroute-dlr=true log-file=mysmsc2.log log-level=0 allowed-smsc-id=smsc2 denied-smsc-id=smsc1 # Multi Group smsbox-route group = smsbox-route smsbox-id = mysmsbox smsc-id = smsc1 group = smsbox-route smsbox-id = mysmsbox smsc-id = smsc2 # Multi Group sms-service group = sms-service keyword = default text = No service specified accept-x-kannel-headers = true concatenation = true catch-all = true # Multi Group sendsms-user group = sendsms-user name = mysendsmsuser1 username = tester1 password = tester1 max-messages=10 *sqlbox.conf* # SQLBox
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
Hi Ammar! I suggest you check the load in the SQLBox, BearerBox, MySQL and SMSBox. Our experience is that Mysql tends to slow things down a lot. Another enhancement we've had success with has been having 3-6 SMSBox instances running and connected to the bearerbox, and HAProxy on top distributing messages among them. SMSBoxes are very scalable, and can even be set on separate machines. Ideally, something like: Application+SMSBOX Bearerbox+Backends(ex:Mysql) SMSC Yet, you must check where is the actual bottleneck. On our experience it was MySQL. Finally, and again on our experience, Bearerbox will load CPU as it gets overworked, but RAM will be consumed only as long as messages are in queue (in RAM), Ex: pending DLR without DDBB backend (managed in memory) Hope this helps Cheers, David Szanto El 16/01/15 a las 13:24, Ammar Ali escribió: Hello Everyone, I had started kannel sms gateway before past 2 days. When I was started kannel then tested my application, it shows me 500-800 messages second speed but now I'm getting 200-300 Max messages/second. And the main problem is that it is not increased above 300. Can you suggest me that what is the main bottleneck in whole system setup. Because currently I'm connecting Fake SMSC connections. Thanks in advance *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Christopher Burke christopher.bu...@simulity.com mailto:christopher.bu...@simulity.com wrote: Hey, If you’re attempting to optimise the solution, you’ll probably want to look at a testbed. Check out https://github.com/twitter/cloudhopper-smpp which is a Java SMPP implementation. I use this and on my 2012 Macbook Pro (2.6ghz i7/8GB RAM/512GB SSD) I get 4.8k submit/sec over 10 sessons when I use Netty 6. Perhaps you can setup another box using the ch-smpp impl for listening (they’ve got performance code/configuration examples in the test/../demo dirs, and have your Kannel submit to it. On the configuration you currently have, you should expect 200-300 msg/sec using Kannel, I’ve never seen it submit much faster than that but admittedly I find understanding Java code a bit easier so I work with ch-smpp more now. Cheers, *Christopher Burke *http://simulity.com http://simulity.com/ Office: +44 (0) 1248 679 281 Fax: +44 (0) 1248 660 323 Skype:krslynx *UK *Unit 8, Ash Court, Parc Menai, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 4DF, Wales, UK *Malaysia *Level 30, The Gardens North Tower, Mid Valley City, Lingkaran Syed Putra, 59200, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia NOTICE: This message contains privileged confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Simulity Labs immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of Simulity Labs On 16 January 2015 at 11:13:34, Mohammed Saleem (mohammedsl...@gmail.com mailto:mohammedsl...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi Then specs you have is more than enough to send even 10k SMS / second with correct configurations. But the bottleneck is the network speed and the allowed TPS from the operator. On Jan 16, 2015 1:40 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com mailto:ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Currently, I have 4 GB RAM, Intel 24 Core Processor and 120 GB HDD but I'm not getting this TPS (300-500) in a second. Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Dec 31 2014 18:29:22', compiler `4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11)'. System Linux, release 2.6.32-042stab094.7, version #1 SMP Wed Oct 22 12:43:21 MSK 2014, machine x86_64. Hostname localhost, IP 192.168.1.1. Libxml version 2.7.6. Using OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013. Compiled with MySQL 5.5.40, using MySQL 5.6.22. Using native malloc. One more thing sometimes I'm getting this TPS but next time It has been decreased and reached at 100-200 TPS in a second. Can you suggest me where the problem in my whole system. This is my whole setup: [Bearerbox]-[SQLBox]-[SMSBox][Fake SMSC (Multiple)] *Configurations:* *Kannel.conf* * * # Single Group CORE group = core admin-port = 13000 admin-port-ssl=no admin-password = *** status-password = *** admin-deny-ip=*.*.*.* admin-allow-ip=*.*.*.* smsbox-interface =127.0.0.1 smsbox-port = 13001 smsbox-port-ssl=no log-file = kannel.log
how kannel determine its speed for outbound sms
Hey, When I'm talking about how to increase speed of sending sms then everyone says this is all depends on SMSC throughput. But I'm using Fake SMSC Connections. What will be the required throughput for this Fake SMSC for get 1K messages/second? *Thanks* *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technologies* *Pune (Maharashtra)*
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
Hi David Szanto, I'm also testing with multiple SQLBoxes. This is the my configuration: *Application---BBox---Multiple SQLBoxes---SMSBoxMultiple SMSC (Fake)* But I'm not getting better performance. Thanks in advance. *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:05 PM, David Szanto dsza...@genasys.com wrote: Hi Ammar! I suggest you check the load in the SQLBox, BearerBox, MySQL and SMSBox. Our experience is that Mysql tends to slow things down a lot. Another enhancement we've had success with has been having 3-6 SMSBox instances running and connected to the bearerbox, and HAProxy on top distributing messages among them. SMSBoxes are very scalable, and can even be set on separate machines. Ideally, something like: Application+SMSBOX Bearerbox+Backends(ex:Mysql) SMSC Yet, you must check where is the actual bottleneck. On our experience it was MySQL. Finally, and again on our experience, Bearerbox will load CPU as it gets overworked, but RAM will be consumed only as long as messages are in queue (in RAM), Ex: pending DLR without DDBB backend (managed in memory) Hope this helps Cheers, David Szanto El 16/01/15 a las 13:24, Ammar Ali escribió: Hello Everyone, I had started kannel sms gateway before past 2 days. When I was started kannel then tested my application, it shows me 500-800 messages second speed but now I'm getting 200-300 Max messages/second. And the main problem is that it is not increased above 300. Can you suggest me that what is the main bottleneck in whole system setup. Because currently I'm connecting Fake SMSC connections. Thanks in advance *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Christopher Burke christopher.bu...@simulity.com wrote: Hey, If you’re attempting to optimise the solution, you’ll probably want to look at a testbed. Check out https://github.com/twitter/cloudhopper-smpp which is a Java SMPP implementation. I use this and on my 2012 Macbook Pro (2.6ghz i7/8GB RAM/512GB SSD) I get 4.8k submit/sec over 10 sessons when I use Netty 6. Perhaps you can setup another box using the ch-smpp impl for listening (they’ve got performance code/configuration examples in the test/../demo dirs, and have your Kannel submit to it. On the configuration you currently have, you should expect 200-300 msg/sec using Kannel, I’ve never seen it submit much faster than that but admittedly I find understanding Java code a bit easier so I work with ch-smpp more now. Cheers, *Christopher Burke *http://simulity.com Office: +44 (0) 1248 679 281 Fax: +44 (0) 1248 660 323 Skype:krslynx *UK *Unit 8, Ash Court, Parc Menai, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 4DF, Wales, UK *Malaysia *Level 30, The Gardens North Tower, Mid Valley City, Lingkaran Syed Putra, 59200, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia NOTICE: This message contains privileged confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Simulity Labs immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of Simulity Labs On 16 January 2015 at 11:13:34, Mohammed Saleem (mohammedsl...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi Then specs you have is more than enough to send even 10k SMS / second with correct configurations. But the bottleneck is the network speed and the allowed TPS from the operator. On Jan 16, 2015 1:40 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Currently, I have 4 GB RAM, Intel 24 Core Processor and 120 GB HDD but I'm not getting this TPS (300-500) in a second. Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Dec 31 2014 18:29:22', compiler `4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11)'. System Linux, release 2.6.32-042stab094.7, version #1 SMP Wed Oct 22 12:43:21 MSK 2014, machine x86_64. Hostname localhost, IP 192.168.1.1. Libxml version 2.7.6. Using OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013. Compiled with MySQL 5.5.40, using MySQL 5.6.22. Using native malloc. One more thing sometimes I'm getting this TPS but next time It has been decreased and reached at 100-200 TPS in a second. Can you suggest me where the problem in my whole system. This is my whole setup: [Bearerbox]-[SQLBox]-[SMSBox][Fake SMSC (Multiple)] *Configurations:* *Kannel.conf* # Single Group CORE group = core admin-port = 13000 admin-port-ssl=no admin-password = *** status-password = *** admin-deny-ip=*.*.*.* admin-allow-ip=*.*.*.* smsbox-interface =127.0.0.1 smsbox-port = 13001 smsbox-port-ssl=no log-file = kannel.log log-level = 0 access-log = access.access dlr-storage = internal sms-incoming-queue-limit = -1
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
Hi Everyone, with 2 cores , 2 GB Ram 20 GB H.D.D. In a virtual Machine with 512 Kbps ILL. I am getting 550 TPS with my Live (Mobile) Operator. 2 Sessions with 250+ tps each My Settings: 1. SMS APP SQLBOX Bearerbox 2. Kannel sql box log level =3 3. log file is placed in a partition with ext2 4. Dlr are placed in mysql table. 5. Spool folder is placed in ext2 6. Mysql 5.5 7. Centos 6.6 8. 1 Sqlbox 9. 2 mysql connections in kannel sqlbox With the above I am getting 550+ TPS. I want to try with 4 cores, 2+ Sqlboxes. Sqlbox performance Smsboxes as smsboxes have to hit a webpage, open mysql ,run query close connection. *Rajeev Krishna* Operations Manager Krishnas Software Technologies www.krishnasoft.in mobile :+91 888 5815 888 Sales :+91 888 5813 888 Support :+91 888 5817 888 On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David Szanto, I'm also testing with multiple SQLBoxes. This is the my configuration: *Application---BBox---Multiple SQLBoxes---SMSBoxMultiple SMSC (Fake)* But I'm not getting better performance. Thanks in advance. *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:05 PM, David Szanto dsza...@genasys.com wrote: Hi Ammar! I suggest you check the load in the SQLBox, BearerBox, MySQL and SMSBox. Our experience is that Mysql tends to slow things down a lot. Another enhancement we've had success with has been having 3-6 SMSBox instances running and connected to the bearerbox, and HAProxy on top distributing messages among them. SMSBoxes are very scalable, and can even be set on separate machines. Ideally, something like: Application+SMSBOX Bearerbox+Backends(ex:Mysql) SMSC Yet, you must check where is the actual bottleneck. On our experience it was MySQL. Finally, and again on our experience, Bearerbox will load CPU as it gets overworked, but RAM will be consumed only as long as messages are in queue (in RAM), Ex: pending DLR without DDBB backend (managed in memory) Hope this helps Cheers, David Szanto El 16/01/15 a las 13:24, Ammar Ali escribió: Hello Everyone, I had started kannel sms gateway before past 2 days. When I was started kannel then tested my application, it shows me 500-800 messages second speed but now I'm getting 200-300 Max messages/second. And the main problem is that it is not increased above 300. Can you suggest me that what is the main bottleneck in whole system setup. Because currently I'm connecting Fake SMSC connections. Thanks in advance *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Christopher Burke christopher.bu...@simulity.com wrote: Hey, If you’re attempting to optimise the solution, you’ll probably want to look at a testbed. Check out https://github.com/twitter/cloudhopper-smpp which is a Java SMPP implementation. I use this and on my 2012 Macbook Pro (2.6ghz i7/8GB RAM/512GB SSD) I get 4.8k submit/sec over 10 sessons when I use Netty 6. Perhaps you can setup another box using the ch-smpp impl for listening (they’ve got performance code/configuration examples in the test/../demo dirs, and have your Kannel submit to it. On the configuration you currently have, you should expect 200-300 msg/sec using Kannel, I’ve never seen it submit much faster than that but admittedly I find understanding Java code a bit easier so I work with ch-smpp more now. Cheers, *Christopher Burke *http://simulity.com Office: +44 (0) 1248 679 281 Fax: +44 (0) 1248 660 323 Skype:krslynx *UK *Unit 8, Ash Court, Parc Menai, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 4DF, Wales, UK *Malaysia *Level 30, The Gardens North Tower, Mid Valley City, Lingkaran Syed Putra, 59200, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia NOTICE: This message contains privileged confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Simulity Labs immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of Simulity Labs On 16 January 2015 at 11:13:34, Mohammed Saleem (mohammedsl...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi Then specs you have is more than enough to send even 10k SMS / second with correct configurations. But the bottleneck is the network speed and the allowed TPS from the operator. On Jan 16, 2015 1:40 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Currently, I have 4 GB RAM, Intel 24 Core Processor and 120 GB HDD but I'm not getting this TPS (300-500) in a second. Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Dec 31 2014 18:29:22', compiler `4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-11)'. System Linux, release 2.6.32-042stab094.7, version #1 SMP
Re: Kannel with Huawei K5150
sudo apt-get install usbmode-switch. Your modem acts as a usb storage in something called ZeroCD Effect. usbmode switch prevents it from doing so hence you can install minicom or wvdial to use it for net access. Happy hacking! -- -- Kind Regards. *Makhanu Sinja.* +254 (0) 72168 0868 || Email me jeysi...@gmail.com || @iMakhs http://www.twitter.com/iMakhs *I do know everything, just not all at once. It's a virtual memory problem.*
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
Hey, I have one more serious issue. Kannel Bearerbox consumes 28% of My total RAM. So Can you suggest me where is actual issue in my whole setup? *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technologies* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:20 PM, RK Krishnas r...@krishnasoft.in wrote: Hi Everyone, with 2 cores , 2 GB Ram 20 GB H.D.D. In a virtual Machine with 512 Kbps ILL. I am getting 550 TPS with my Live (Mobile) Operator. 2 Sessions with 250+ tps each My Settings: 1. SMS APP SQLBOX Bearerbox 2. Kannel sql box log level =3 3. log file is placed in a partition with ext2 4. Dlr are placed in mysql table. 5. Spool folder is placed in ext2 6. Mysql 5.5 7. Centos 6.6 8. 1 Sqlbox 9. 2 mysql connections in kannel sqlbox With the above I am getting 550+ TPS. I want to try with 4 cores, 2+ Sqlboxes. Sqlbox performance Smsboxes as smsboxes have to hit a webpage, open mysql ,run query close connection. *Rajeev Krishna* Operations Manager Krishnas Software Technologies www.krishnasoft.in mobile :+91 888 5815 888 Sales :+91 888 5813 888 Support :+91 888 5817 888 On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David Szanto, I'm also testing with multiple SQLBoxes. This is the my configuration: *Application---BBox---Multiple SQLBoxes---SMSBoxMultiple SMSC (Fake)* But I'm not getting better performance. Thanks in advance. *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:05 PM, David Szanto dsza...@genasys.com wrote: Hi Ammar! I suggest you check the load in the SQLBox, BearerBox, MySQL and SMSBox. Our experience is that Mysql tends to slow things down a lot. Another enhancement we've had success with has been having 3-6 SMSBox instances running and connected to the bearerbox, and HAProxy on top distributing messages among them. SMSBoxes are very scalable, and can even be set on separate machines. Ideally, something like: Application+SMSBOX Bearerbox+Backends(ex:Mysql) SMSC Yet, you must check where is the actual bottleneck. On our experience it was MySQL. Finally, and again on our experience, Bearerbox will load CPU as it gets overworked, but RAM will be consumed only as long as messages are in queue (in RAM), Ex: pending DLR without DDBB backend (managed in memory) Hope this helps Cheers, David Szanto El 16/01/15 a las 13:24, Ammar Ali escribió: Hello Everyone, I had started kannel sms gateway before past 2 days. When I was started kannel then tested my application, it shows me 500-800 messages second speed but now I'm getting 200-300 Max messages/second. And the main problem is that it is not increased above 300. Can you suggest me that what is the main bottleneck in whole system setup. Because currently I'm connecting Fake SMSC connections. Thanks in advance *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Christopher Burke christopher.bu...@simulity.com wrote: Hey, If you’re attempting to optimise the solution, you’ll probably want to look at a testbed. Check out https://github.com/twitter/cloudhopper-smpp which is a Java SMPP implementation. I use this and on my 2012 Macbook Pro (2.6ghz i7/8GB RAM/512GB SSD) I get 4.8k submit/sec over 10 sessons when I use Netty 6. Perhaps you can setup another box using the ch-smpp impl for listening (they’ve got performance code/configuration examples in the test/../demo dirs, and have your Kannel submit to it. On the configuration you currently have, you should expect 200-300 msg/sec using Kannel, I’ve never seen it submit much faster than that but admittedly I find understanding Java code a bit easier so I work with ch-smpp more now. Cheers, *Christopher Burke *http://simulity.com Office: +44 (0) 1248 679 281 Fax: +44 (0) 1248 660 323 Skype:krslynx *UK *Unit 8, Ash Court, Parc Menai, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 4DF, Wales, UK *Malaysia *Level 30, The Gardens North Tower, Mid Valley City, Lingkaran Syed Putra, 59200, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia NOTICE: This message contains privileged confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Simulity Labs immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of Simulity Labs On 16 January 2015 at 11:13:34, Mohammed Saleem ( mohammedsl...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi Then specs you have is more than enough to send even 10k SMS / second with correct configurations. But the bottleneck is the network speed and the allowed TPS from the operator. On Jan 16, 2015 1:40 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
Hi, use dlr-storage as mysql db. On 1/17/15, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, I have one more serious issue. Kannel Bearerbox consumes 28% of My total RAM. So Can you suggest me where is actual issue in my whole setup? *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technologies* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:20 PM, RK Krishnas r...@krishnasoft.in wrote: Hi Everyone, with 2 cores , 2 GB Ram 20 GB H.D.D. In a virtual Machine with 512 Kbps ILL. I am getting 550 TPS with my Live (Mobile) Operator. 2 Sessions with 250+ tps each My Settings: 1. SMS APP SQLBOX Bearerbox 2. Kannel sql box log level =3 3. log file is placed in a partition with ext2 4. Dlr are placed in mysql table. 5. Spool folder is placed in ext2 6. Mysql 5.5 7. Centos 6.6 8. 1 Sqlbox 9. 2 mysql connections in kannel sqlbox With the above I am getting 550+ TPS. I want to try with 4 cores, 2+ Sqlboxes. Sqlbox performance Smsboxes as smsboxes have to hit a webpage, open mysql ,run query close connection. *Rajeev Krishna* Operations Manager Krishnas Software Technologies www.krishnasoft.in mobile :+91 888 5815 888 Sales :+91 888 5813 888 Support :+91 888 5817 888 On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David Szanto, I'm also testing with multiple SQLBoxes. This is the my configuration: *Application---BBox---Multiple SQLBoxes---SMSBoxMultiple SMSC (Fake)* But I'm not getting better performance. Thanks in advance. *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:05 PM, David Szanto dsza...@genasys.com wrote: Hi Ammar! I suggest you check the load in the SQLBox, BearerBox, MySQL and SMSBox. Our experience is that Mysql tends to slow things down a lot. Another enhancement we've had success with has been having 3-6 SMSBox instances running and connected to the bearerbox, and HAProxy on top distributing messages among them. SMSBoxes are very scalable, and can even be set on separate machines. Ideally, something like: Application+SMSBOX Bearerbox+Backends(ex:Mysql) SMSC Yet, you must check where is the actual bottleneck. On our experience it was MySQL. Finally, and again on our experience, Bearerbox will load CPU as it gets overworked, but RAM will be consumed only as long as messages are in queue (in RAM), Ex: pending DLR without DDBB backend (managed in memory) Hope this helps Cheers, David Szanto El 16/01/15 a las 13:24, Ammar Ali escribió: Hello Everyone, I had started kannel sms gateway before past 2 days. When I was started kannel then tested my application, it shows me 500-800 messages second speed but now I'm getting 200-300 Max messages/second. And the main problem is that it is not increased above 300. Can you suggest me that what is the main bottleneck in whole system setup. Because currently I'm connecting Fake SMSC connections. Thanks in advance *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Christopher Burke christopher.bu...@simulity.com wrote: Hey, If you’re attempting to optimise the solution, you’ll probably want to look at a testbed. Check out https://github.com/twitter/cloudhopper-smpp which is a Java SMPP implementation. I use this and on my 2012 Macbook Pro (2.6ghz i7/8GB RAM/512GB SSD) I get 4.8k submit/sec over 10 sessons when I use Netty 6. Perhaps you can setup another box using the ch-smpp impl for listening (they’ve got performance code/configuration examples in the test/../demo dirs, and have your Kannel submit to it. On the configuration you currently have, you should expect 200-300 msg/sec using Kannel, I’ve never seen it submit much faster than that but admittedly I find understanding Java code a bit easier so I work with ch-smpp more now. Cheers, *Christopher Burke *http://simulity.com Office: +44 (0) 1248 679 281 Fax: +44 (0) 1248 660 323 Skype:krslynx *UK *Unit 8, Ash Court, Parc Menai, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 4DF, Wales, UK *Malaysia *Level 30, The Gardens North Tower, Mid Valley City, Lingkaran Syed Putra, 59200, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia NOTICE: This message contains privileged confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Simulity Labs immediately. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of Simulity Labs On 16 January 2015 at 11:13:34, Mohammed Saleem ( mohammedsl...@gmail.com) wrote: Hi Then specs you have is more than enough to send even 10k SMS / second with correct configurations. But the bottleneck is the
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
Hey, If mysql grows then it will be impact on mysql performance? Because When I'm deleting all records in mysql then the TPS increased and reached at 500-600 messages/second. Ammar Ali Framp Technologies Pune (Maharashtra) On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:51 AM, RK Krishnas r...@krishnasoft.in wrote: Hi, use dlr-storage as mysql db. On 1/17/15, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, I have one more serious issue. Kannel Bearerbox consumes 28% of My total RAM. So Can you suggest me where is actual issue in my whole setup? *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technologies* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:20 PM, RK Krishnas r...@krishnasoft.in wrote: Hi Everyone, with 2 cores , 2 GB Ram 20 GB H.D.D. In a virtual Machine with 512 Kbps ILL. I am getting 550 TPS with my Live (Mobile) Operator. 2 Sessions with 250+ tps each My Settings: 1. SMS APP SQLBOX Bearerbox 2. Kannel sql box log level =3 3. log file is placed in a partition with ext2 4. Dlr are placed in mysql table. 5. Spool folder is placed in ext2 6. Mysql 5.5 7. Centos 6.6 8. 1 Sqlbox 9. 2 mysql connections in kannel sqlbox With the above I am getting 550+ TPS. I want to try with 4 cores, 2+ Sqlboxes. Sqlbox performance Smsboxes as smsboxes have to hit a webpage, open mysql ,run query close connection. *Rajeev Krishna* Operations Manager Krishnas Software Technologies www.krishnasoft.in mobile :+91 888 5815 888 Sales :+91 888 5813 888 Support :+91 888 5817 888 On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David Szanto, I'm also testing with multiple SQLBoxes. This is the my configuration: *Application---BBox---Multiple SQLBoxes---SMSBoxMultiple SMSC (Fake)* But I'm not getting better performance. Thanks in advance. *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:05 PM, David Szanto dsza...@genasys.com wrote: Hi Ammar! I suggest you check the load in the SQLBox, BearerBox, MySQL and SMSBox. Our experience is that Mysql tends to slow things down a lot. Another enhancement we've had success with has been having 3-6 SMSBox instances running and connected to the bearerbox, and HAProxy on top distributing messages among them. SMSBoxes are very scalable, and can even be set on separate machines. Ideally, something like: Application+SMSBOX Bearerbox+Backends(ex:Mysql) SMSC Yet, you must check where is the actual bottleneck. On our experience it was MySQL. Finally, and again on our experience, Bearerbox will load CPU as it gets overworked, but RAM will be consumed only as long as messages are in queue (in RAM), Ex: pending DLR without DDBB backend (managed in memory) Hope this helps Cheers, David Szanto El 16/01/15 a las 13:24, Ammar Ali escribió: Hello Everyone, I had started kannel sms gateway before past 2 days. When I was started kannel then tested my application, it shows me 500-800 messages second speed but now I'm getting 200-300 Max messages/second. And the main problem is that it is not increased above 300. Can you suggest me that what is the main bottleneck in whole system setup. Because currently I'm connecting Fake SMSC connections. Thanks in advance *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Christopher Burke christopher.bu...@simulity.com wrote: Hey, If you’re attempting to optimise the solution, you’ll probably want to look at a testbed. Check out https://github.com/twitter/cloudhopper-smpp which is a Java SMPP implementation. I use this and on my 2012 Macbook Pro (2.6ghz i7/8GB RAM/512GB SSD) I get 4.8k submit/sec over 10 sessons when I use Netty 6. Perhaps you can setup another box using the ch-smpp impl for listening (they’ve got performance code/configuration examples in the test/../demo dirs, and have your Kannel submit to it. On the configuration you currently have, you should expect 200-300 msg/sec using Kannel, I’ve never seen it submit much faster than that but admittedly I find understanding Java code a bit easier so I work with ch-smpp more now. Cheers, *Christopher Burke *http://simulity.com Office: +44 (0) 1248 679 281 Fax: +44 (0) 1248 660 323 Skype:krslynx *UK *Unit 8, Ash Court, Parc Menai, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 4DF, Wales, UK *Malaysia *Level 30, The Gardens North Tower, Mid Valley City, Lingkaran Syed Putra, 59200, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia NOTICE: This message contains privileged confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy or
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
Look into 2015-01-17 8:10 GMT+03:00 Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com: Hey, I have one more serious issue. Kannel Bearerbox consumes 28% of My total RAM. So Can you suggest me where is actual issue in my whole setup? Look into smsbox-max-pending variable. It's used in case you have temporary problems with smsbox connectivity to keep pending queue of MT/MO messages in the memory for each smsbox instance. So memory usage of bearerbox would depend on this variable pretty much * on the number of connected smsbox/sqlbox instances. If you want to learn more about it read user guide. *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technologies* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:20 PM, RK Krishnas r...@krishnasoft.in wrote: Hi Everyone, with 2 cores , 2 GB Ram 20 GB H.D.D. In a virtual Machine with 512 Kbps ILL. I am getting 550 TPS with my Live (Mobile) Operator. 2 Sessions with 250+ tps each My Settings: 1. SMS APP SQLBOX Bearerbox 2. Kannel sql box log level =3 3. log file is placed in a partition with ext2 4. Dlr are placed in mysql table. 5. Spool folder is placed in ext2 6. Mysql 5.5 7. Centos 6.6 8. 1 Sqlbox 9. 2 mysql connections in kannel sqlbox With the above I am getting 550+ TPS. I want to try with 4 cores, 2+ Sqlboxes. Sqlbox performance Smsboxes as smsboxes have to hit a webpage, open mysql ,run query close connection. *Rajeev Krishna* Operations Manager Krishnas Software Technologies www.krishnasoft.in mobile :+91 888 5815 888 Sales :+91 888 5813 888 Support :+91 888 5817 888 On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David Szanto, I'm also testing with multiple SQLBoxes. This is the my configuration: *Application---BBox---Multiple SQLBoxes---SMSBoxMultiple SMSC (Fake)* But I'm not getting better performance. Thanks in advance. *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:05 PM, David Szanto dsza...@genasys.com wrote: Hi Ammar! I suggest you check the load in the SQLBox, BearerBox, MySQL and SMSBox. Our experience is that Mysql tends to slow things down a lot. Another enhancement we've had success with has been having 3-6 SMSBox instances running and connected to the bearerbox, and HAProxy on top distributing messages among them. SMSBoxes are very scalable, and can even be set on separate machines. Ideally, something like: Application+SMSBOX Bearerbox+Backends(ex:Mysql) SMSC Yet, you must check where is the actual bottleneck. On our experience it was MySQL. Finally, and again on our experience, Bearerbox will load CPU as it gets overworked, but RAM will be consumed only as long as messages are in queue (in RAM), Ex: pending DLR without DDBB backend (managed in memory) Hope this helps Cheers, David Szanto El 16/01/15 a las 13:24, Ammar Ali escribió: Hello Everyone, I had started kannel sms gateway before past 2 days. When I was started kannel then tested my application, it shows me 500-800 messages second speed but now I'm getting 200-300 Max messages/second. And the main problem is that it is not increased above 300. Can you suggest me that what is the main bottleneck in whole system setup. Because currently I'm connecting Fake SMSC connections. Thanks in advance *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Christopher Burke christopher.bu...@simulity.com wrote: Hey, If you’re attempting to optimise the solution, you’ll probably want to look at a testbed. Check out https://github.com/twitter/cloudhopper-smpp which is a Java SMPP implementation. I use this and on my 2012 Macbook Pro (2.6ghz i7/8GB RAM/512GB SSD) I get 4.8k submit/sec over 10 sessons when I use Netty 6. Perhaps you can setup another box using the ch-smpp impl for listening (they’ve got performance code/configuration examples in the test/../demo dirs, and have your Kannel submit to it. On the configuration you currently have, you should expect 200-300 msg/sec using Kannel, I’ve never seen it submit much faster than that but admittedly I find understanding Java code a bit easier so I work with ch-smpp more now. Cheers, *Christopher Burke *http://simulity.com Office: +44 (0) 1248 679 281 Fax: +44 (0) 1248 660 323 Skype:krslynx *UK *Unit 8, Ash Court, Parc Menai, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 4DF, Wales, UK *Malaysia *Level 30, The Gardens North Tower, Mid Valley City, Lingkaran Syed Putra, 59200, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia NOTICE: This message contains privileged confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are hereby notified that you must not disseminate, copy or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this message in error, please notify Simulity Labs immediately. Any views expressed in this
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
2015-01-17 8:49 GMT+03:00 Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com: Hey, If mysql grows then it will be impact on mysql performance? Because When I'm deleting all records in mysql then the TPS increased and reached at 500-600 messages/second. If you need accurate benchmark results. 1) Test kannel without any DLR reports activated, store spool in the memory (e.g. tmpfs), use internal storage for DLR. 2) Slowly increase factors (e.g. add DLR reports in internal storage, measure.. add MySQL storage .. measure). 3) In the end you'll get what's slowing down kannel. In my own experience the most slowing factor is either MySQL or sqlbox itself (if it's outdated it gets 1 message per query instead of the batch method where it gets multiple records at once). Ammar Ali Framp Technologies Pune (Maharashtra) On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:51 AM, RK Krishnas r...@krishnasoft.in wrote: Hi, use dlr-storage as mysql db. On 1/17/15, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, I have one more serious issue. Kannel Bearerbox consumes 28% of My total RAM. So Can you suggest me where is actual issue in my whole setup? *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technologies* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:20 PM, RK Krishnas r...@krishnasoft.in wrote: Hi Everyone, with 2 cores , 2 GB Ram 20 GB H.D.D. In a virtual Machine with 512 Kbps ILL. I am getting 550 TPS with my Live (Mobile) Operator. 2 Sessions with 250+ tps each My Settings: 1. SMS APP SQLBOX Bearerbox 2. Kannel sql box log level =3 3. log file is placed in a partition with ext2 4. Dlr are placed in mysql table. 5. Spool folder is placed in ext2 6. Mysql 5.5 7. Centos 6.6 8. 1 Sqlbox 9. 2 mysql connections in kannel sqlbox With the above I am getting 550+ TPS. I want to try with 4 cores, 2+ Sqlboxes. Sqlbox performance Smsboxes as smsboxes have to hit a webpage, open mysql ,run query close connection. *Rajeev Krishna* Operations Manager Krishnas Software Technologies www.krishnasoft.in mobile :+91 888 5815 888 Sales :+91 888 5813 888 Support :+91 888 5817 888 On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David Szanto, I'm also testing with multiple SQLBoxes. This is the my configuration: *Application---BBox---Multiple SQLBoxes---SMSBoxMultiple SMSC (Fake)* But I'm not getting better performance. Thanks in advance. *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:05 PM, David Szanto dsza...@genasys.com wrote: Hi Ammar! I suggest you check the load in the SQLBox, BearerBox, MySQL and SMSBox. Our experience is that Mysql tends to slow things down a lot. Another enhancement we've had success with has been having 3-6 SMSBox instances running and connected to the bearerbox, and HAProxy on top distributing messages among them. SMSBoxes are very scalable, and can even be set on separate machines. Ideally, something like: Application+SMSBOX Bearerbox+Backends(ex:Mysql) SMSC Yet, you must check where is the actual bottleneck. On our experience it was MySQL. Finally, and again on our experience, Bearerbox will load CPU as it gets overworked, but RAM will be consumed only as long as messages are in queue (in RAM), Ex: pending DLR without DDBB backend (managed in memory) Hope this helps Cheers, David Szanto El 16/01/15 a las 13:24, Ammar Ali escribió: Hello Everyone, I had started kannel sms gateway before past 2 days. When I was started kannel then tested my application, it shows me 500-800 messages second speed but now I'm getting 200-300 Max messages/second. And the main problem is that it is not increased above 300. Can you suggest me that what is the main bottleneck in whole system setup. Because currently I'm connecting Fake SMSC connections. Thanks in advance *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technology* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Christopher Burke christopher.bu...@simulity.com wrote: Hey, If you’re attempting to optimise the solution, you’ll probably want to look at a testbed. Check out https://github.com/twitter/cloudhopper-smpp which is a Java SMPP implementation. I use this and on my 2012 Macbook Pro (2.6ghz i7/8GB RAM/512GB SSD) I get 4.8k submit/sec over 10 sessons when I use Netty 6. Perhaps you can setup another box using the ch-smpp impl for listening (they’ve got performance code/configuration examples in the test/../demo dirs, and have your Kannel submit to it. On the configuration you currently have, you should expect 200-300 msg/sec using Kannel, I’ve never seen it submit much faster than that but admittedly I find understanding Java code a bit easier so I work with ch-smpp more now.
Re: Minimum Requirement for getting 1000 message per second
Hey, This is my kannel and sqlbox configuration: *# Single Group CORE* group = core admin-port = 15000 admin-port-ssl=no admin-password = ** status-password = ** admin-deny-ip=*.*.*.* admin-allow-ip=*.*.*.* smsbox-interface =127.0.0.1 smsbox-port = 15001 smsbox-port-ssl=no log-file = kannel.log log-level = 0 access-log = access.access dlr-storage = internal sms-incoming-queue-limit = -1 sms-outgoing-queue-limit = 100 smsbox-max-pending = 100 sms-resend-freq = 60 sms-resend-retry = -1 # Single Group smsbox group = smsbox smsbox-id = smsbox bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1 bearerbox-port = 15001 sendsms-port = 15010 log-file = smsbox.log log-level = 0 access-log=saccess.access sendsms-chars = 0123456789+ # Multi Group SMSC group = smsc smsc = fake smsc-id = smsc1 host=localhost port = 10001 throughput=100.00 connect-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 reroute-dlr=true log-file=mysmsc1.log log-level=0 allowed-smsc-id=smsc1 denied-smsc-id=smsc2 group = smsc smsc = fake smsc-id = smsc2 host=localhost port = 10002 throughput=100.00 connect-allow-ip = 127.0.0.1 reroute-dlr=true log-file=mysmsc2.log log-level=0 allowed-smsc-id=smsc2 denied-smsc-id=smsc1 # Multi Group smsbox-route group = smsbox-route smsbox-id = smsbox smsc-id = smsc1 group = smsbox-route smsbox-id = smsbox smsc-id = smsc2 # Multi Group sms-service group = sms-service keyword = default text = No service specified accept-x-kannel-headers = true concatenation = true catch-all = true # Multi Group sendsms-user group = sendsms-user name = sendsmsuser1 username = tester1 password = tester1 max-messages=10 - *# SQLBox Configuraton* group = sqlbox id = sqlbox-db smsbox-id = sqlbox global-sender = bearerbox-host = localhost bearerbox-port = 15001 smsbox-port = 15002 smsbox-port-ssl = false sql-log-table = sent_sms sql-insert-table = send_sms log-file = sqlbox.log log-level = 0 # Example MYSQL Connection group = mysql-connection id = sqlbox-db host=127.0.0.1 port = 3306 username = root password = ** database = my_sms max-connections = 10 --- And I'm using batch insertion in my application. Please check my whole configuration and let me know what is the actual issue. One more thing the speed of message sending is very fluctuate. Sometime its reached to 800 messages/sec and sometimes very low at 200-300 messages/sec with same configurations. Is there any issue when mysql data grows. Thanks Ammar Ali Framp Technologies Pune (Maharashtra) On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 12:02 PM, spameden spame...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-01-17 8:49 GMT+03:00 Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com: Hey, If mysql grows then it will be impact on mysql performance? Because When I'm deleting all records in mysql then the TPS increased and reached at 500-600 messages/second. If you need accurate benchmark results. 1) Test kannel without any DLR reports activated, store spool in the memory (e.g. tmpfs), use internal storage for DLR. 2) Slowly increase factors (e.g. add DLR reports in internal storage, measure.. add MySQL storage .. measure). 3) In the end you'll get what's slowing down kannel. In my own experience the most slowing factor is either MySQL or sqlbox itself (if it's outdated it gets 1 message per query instead of the batch method where it gets multiple records at once). Ammar Ali Framp Technologies Pune (Maharashtra) On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:51 AM, RK Krishnas r...@krishnasoft.in wrote: Hi, use dlr-storage as mysql db. On 1/17/15, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hey, I have one more serious issue. Kannel Bearerbox consumes 28% of My total RAM. So Can you suggest me where is actual issue in my whole setup? *Ammar Ali* *Framp Technologies* *Pune (Maharashtra)* On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:20 PM, RK Krishnas r...@krishnasoft.in wrote: Hi Everyone, with 2 cores , 2 GB Ram 20 GB H.D.D. In a virtual Machine with 512 Kbps ILL. I am getting 550 TPS with my Live (Mobile) Operator. 2 Sessions with 250+ tps each My Settings: 1. SMS APP SQLBOX Bearerbox 2. Kannel sql box log level =3 3. log file is placed in a partition with ext2 4. Dlr are placed in mysql table. 5. Spool folder is placed in ext2 6. Mysql 5.5 7. Centos 6.6 8. 1 Sqlbox 9. 2 mysql connections in kannel sqlbox With the above I am getting 550+ TPS. I want to try with 4 cores, 2+ Sqlboxes. Sqlbox performance Smsboxes as smsboxes have to hit a webpage, open mysql ,run query close connection. *Rajeev Krishna* Operations Manager Krishnas Software Technologies www.krishnasoft.in mobile :+91 888 5815 888 Sales :+91 888 5813 888 Support :+91 888 5817 888 On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Ammar Ali ammarali3...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David Szanto, I'm also testing with
