Re: Kannel 1.5 on a 64-bit OS
Am 10.11.2014 19:30, schrieb Lamasuta Franck: Hi all, We are running Kannel 1.5 on a server with RHEL4 (32 bits) and we are using the SMPP, CIMD2 and HTTP interfaces. We would like to upgrade the server to RHEL 6.4 (64 bits). Is Kannel fully compatible with a 64-bit OS? Kannel itself and the commercial Kannel SMPP v5.0 server (smppbox) are in production use on numerous x86_64-centos-6 (RHEL 6) sites around the globe without any issue based on 64bit. Stipe -- --- Kölner Landstrasse 419 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org ---
Kannel 1.5 on a 64-bit OS
Hi all, We are running Kannel 1.5 on a server with RHEL4 (32 bits) and we are using the SMPP, CIMD2 and HTTP interfaces. We would like to upgrade the server to RHEL 6.4 (64 bits). Is Kannel fully compatible with a 64-bit OS? Regards, Franck
Re: Kannel 1.5 on a 64-bit OS
Yes, I am working on 64 bit centos 6.5 from past 1 year. No issues at all. *Rajeev Krishna* Operations Manager Krishnas Software Technologies www.krishnasoft.in mobile :+91 888 5815 888 Sales :+91 888 5813 888 Support :+91 888 5817 888 On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Lamasuta Franck f.lamas...@cobratelematics.com wrote: Hi all, We are running Kannel 1.5 on a server with RHEL4 (32 bits) and we are using the SMPP, CIMD2 and HTTP interfaces. We would like to upgrade the server to RHEL 6.4 (64 bits). Is Kannel fully compatible with a 64-bit OS? Regards, Franck
Re: Kannel 1.5 on a 64-bit OS
2014-11-10 21:30 GMT+03:00 Lamasuta Franck f.lamas...@cobratelematics.com: Hi all, We are running Kannel 1.5 on a server with RHEL4 (32 bits) and we are using the SMPP, CIMD2 and HTTP interfaces. We would like to upgrade the server to RHEL 6.4 (64 bits). Is Kannel fully compatible with a 64-bit OS? It's working completely fine on 64bit environment, however it might consume more memory because of 64bit pointers and memory allocation. Kannel's memory consuming depends mostly on number of smsbox'es connected to bearerbox * smsbox-max-pending parameter. So if you want to lower amount of memory used by bearerbox tweak smsbox-max-pending parameter. Regards, Franck