RE: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

2015-12-16 Thread Amit Sharma (VAS)
Thanks Enrique this helped.


Best regards

Amit Sharma

From: Enrique Echeverria [mailto:enriqueocta...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 5:55 PM
To: amal...@kannel.org
Cc: Amit Sharma (VAS); users@kannel.org
Subject: Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

Hi Amit:

At SMPP level, every time you send and MT you send a submit_sm PDU, that needs 
to receive back a submit_sm_resp  PDU (this would be the ack) from the SMSC.

Every time you receive the ACK (submit_sm_resp PDU), that message is "tagged" 
as sent (and so deleted from kannel queue), and as long as the ACK is not 
received the message is still tagged as "not sent" (and so still queued).

Obviously, there is a timeout for that ACK (submit_sm_resp PDU) to come back, 
and once the timeout expires the message is queued for retry (and so the "Not 
ACKED message found, will retransmit." message is logged to the bind level log)

Kannel has 2 parameters for controlling this behaviour :

wait-ack ->A message is resent if the acknowledge from SMSC takes more than 
this time. Defaults to 60 seconds.
wait-ack-expire -> Defines what kind of action should be taken if the ack of a 
message expires. The options for this value are: 0x00 - disconnect/reconnect, 
(default) 0x01 - as is now, re-queue, but this could potentially result in the 
msg arriving twice 0x02 - just carry on waiting (given that the wait-ack should 
never expire this is the must accurate)

So, the fact that you are seeing the "Not ACKED message found, will retransmit" 
but the MTs are anyway reaching the handset means that the ACK is arriving from 
the SMSC when your timeout is already expired. You should capturer traffic, 
measure the submit_sm_resp arrrival delay, and set your wait-ack parameter 
accordingly. Using wait-ack-expire would be nastier.

Hope this helps, kind regards: enrique



On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:04 AM, 
<amal...@kannel.org<mailto:amal...@kannel.org>> wrote:
Hi,

check your logs whether you received ACK/NACK for those sequence numbers and if 
not
ask by SMSC operator why you don’t receive ACK/NACK within > 60 sec.

Alex


Am 14.12.2015 um 11:33 schrieb Amit Sharma (VAS) 
<amit.shar...@mtsindia.in<mailto:amit.shar...@mtsindia.in>>:

Hi,
I am getting following error of “Not ACKED message found, will retransmit” 
again and again due to which at times a single number receives multiple sms. In 
below case “9142294005” number received 9 msgs.

Please suggest the reason for the below error & rectification to be done 
accordingly.


2015-12-13 09:36:49 [15072] [18] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
"9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:37:55 [15072] [18] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<66>sec. ago, SEQ<187878>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 09:40:16 [15072] [22] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
"9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:41:20 [15072] [22] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<64>sec. ago, SEQ<189768>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 09:43:44 [15072] [8] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
"9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:46:04 [15072] [10] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
"9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:47:06 [15072] [10] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<62>sec. ago, SEQ<189281>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 09:48:10 [15072] [16] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
"9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:49:17 [15072] [16] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<67>sec. ago, SEQ<189655>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 09:51:18 [15072] [8] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
"9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:52:36 [15072] [8] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<78>sec. ago, SEQ<188844>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 09:53:42 [15072] [20] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
"9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:56:09 [15072] [6] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
"9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:57:13 [15072] [6] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<64>sec. ago, SEQ<189816>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 09:58:14 [15072] [8] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
"9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:59:15 [15072] [8] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<61>sec. ago, SEQ<189177>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 10:01:47 [15072] [20] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
"9142294005"
2015-12-13 10:04:14 [15072] [20] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
"9142294005"
2015-12-13 10:05:23 [15072] [20] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<69>sec. ago, SEQ<189456>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 10:08:14 [15072] [12] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
"9142294005"
2015-12-13 10:09:20 [15072] [12] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
wil

Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

2015-12-16 Thread Enrique Echeverria
Hi Amit:

At SMPP level, every time you send and MT you send a submit_sm PDU, that
needs to receive back a submit_sm_resp  PDU (this would be the ack) from
the SMSC.

Every time you receive the ACK (submit_sm_resp PDU), that message is
"tagged" as sent (and so deleted from kannel queue), and as long as the ACK
is not received the message is still tagged as "not sent" (and so still
queued).

Obviously, there is a timeout for that ACK (submit_sm_resp PDU) to come
back, and once the timeout expires the message is queued for retry (and so
the "Not ACKED message found, will retransmit." message is logged to the
bind level log)

Kannel has 2 parameters for controlling this behaviour :

*wait-ack* ->A message is resent if the acknowledge from SMSC takes more
than this time. Defaults to 60 seconds.
*wait-ack-expire* -> Defines what kind of action should be taken if the ack
of a message expires. The options for this value are: 0x00 -
disconnect/reconnect, (default) 0x01 - as is now, re-queue, but this could
potentially result in the msg arriving twice 0x02 - just carry on waiting
(given that the wait-ack should never expire this is the must accurate)

So, the fact that you are seeing the "Not ACKED message found, will
retransmit" but the MTs are anyway reaching the handset means that the ACK
is arriving from the SMSC when your timeout is already expired. You should
capturer traffic, measure the submit_sm_resp arrrival delay, and set your
wait-ack parameter accordingly. Using wait-ack-expire would be nastier.

Hope this helps, kind regards: enrique



On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 11:04 AM, <amal...@kannel.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> check your logs whether you received ACK/NACK for those sequence numbers
> and if not
> ask by SMSC operator why you don’t receive ACK/NACK within > 60 sec.
>
> Alex
>
>
> Am 14.12.2015 um 11:33 schrieb Amit Sharma (VAS) <amit.shar...@mtsindia.in
> >:
>
> Hi,
> I am getting following error of “Not ACKED message found, will retransmit”
> again and again due to which at times a single number receives multiple
> sms. In below case “9142294005” number received 9 msgs.
>
> Please suggest the reason for the below error & rectification to be done
> accordingly.
>
>
> 2015-12-13 09:36:49 [15072] [18] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:37:55 [15072] [18] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message
> found, will retransmit. SENT<66>sec. ago, SEQ<187878>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 09:40:16 [15072] [22] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:41:20 [15072] [22] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message
> found, will retransmit. SENT<64>sec. ago, SEQ<189768>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 09:43:44 [15072] [8] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:46:04 [15072] [10] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:47:06 [15072] [10] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message
> found, will retransmit. SENT<62>sec. ago, SEQ<189281>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 09:48:10 [15072] [16] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:49:17 [15072] [16] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message
> found, will retransmit. SENT<67>sec. ago, SEQ<189655>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 09:51:18 [15072] [8] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:52:36 [15072] [8] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message
> found, will retransmit. SENT<78>sec. ago, SEQ<188844>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 09:53:42 [15072] [20] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:56:09 [15072] [6] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:57:13 [15072] [6] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message
> found, will retransmit. SENT<64>sec. ago, SEQ<189816>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 09:58:14 [15072] [8] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:59:15 [15072] [8] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message
> found, will retransmit. SENT<61>sec. ago, SEQ<189177>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 10:01:47 [15072] [20] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 10:04:14 [15072] [20] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 10:05:23 [15072] [20] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message
> found, will retransmit. SENT<69>sec. ago, SEQ<189456>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 10:08:14 [15072] [12] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 10:09:20 [15072] [12] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message
> found, will retransmit. SENT<66>sec. ago, SEQ<190251>, DST<9142294005>
>
> Configuration is as follows:
>
> group = core
> admin-port = 130

Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

2015-12-14 Thread Amit Sharma (VAS)
Hi,
I am getting following error of "Not ACKED message found, will retransmit" 
again and again due to which at times a single number receives multiple sms. In 
below case "9142294005" number received 9 msgs.

Please suggest the reason for the below error & rectification to be done 
accordingly.


2015-12-13 09:36:49 [15072] [18] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:37:55 [15072] [18] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<66>sec. ago, SEQ<187878>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 09:40:16 [15072] [22] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:41:20 [15072] [22] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<64>sec. ago, SEQ<189768>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 09:43:44 [15072] [8] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:46:04 [15072] [10] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:47:06 [15072] [10] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<62>sec. ago, SEQ<189281>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 09:48:10 [15072] [16] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:49:17 [15072] [16] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<67>sec. ago, SEQ<189655>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 09:51:18 [15072] [8] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:52:36 [15072] [8] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<78>sec. ago, SEQ<188844>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 09:53:42 [15072] [20] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:56:09 [15072] [6] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:57:13 [15072] [6] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<64>sec. ago, SEQ<189816>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 09:58:14 [15072] [8] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
2015-12-13 09:59:15 [15072] [8] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<61>sec. ago, SEQ<189177>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 10:01:47 [15072] [20] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
2015-12-13 10:04:14 [15072] [20] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
2015-12-13 10:05:23 [15072] [20] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<69>sec. ago, SEQ<189456>, DST<9142294005>
2015-12-13 10:08:14 [15072] [12] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
2015-12-13 10:09:20 [15072] [12] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
will retransmit. SENT<66>sec. ago, SEQ<190251>, DST<9142294005>

Configuration is as follows:

group = core
admin-port = 13010
smsbox-port = 13012
log-file = "/u03/kannel/logs/bearerbox.log"
box-allow-ip = "10.130.252.160,127.0.0.1"
access-log = "/u03/kannel/logs/bearerbox_access.log"
dlr-storage = internal

##TX-1##
group = smsc
smsc-id ="MT"
smsc = smpp
host =10.10.22.10
port = 5016
system-type = "INAPPS"
interface-version = 34
receive-port =0
source-addr-ton = 1
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
keepalive = 30
log-level =0
throughput = 50
max-pending-submits=50
reconnect-delay = 60
reroute = true
log-file = "/u03/kannel/logs/smsc_conn.log"


##RX-1
group = smsc
smsc-id ="MTS"
smsc = smpp
host =10.10.22.10
port = 0
system-type = "INAPPS"
receive-port =5016
interface-version = 34
source-addr-ton = 1
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
keepalive = 30
log-level =0
reconnect-delay = 60
reroute = true
log-file = "/u03/kannel/logs/smsc_conn.log"

group = smsbox
bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
sendsms-port = 13013
global-sender = YD-MTS
log-file = "/u03/kannel/logs/smsbox.log"
log-level = 0

#SMSBOX ROUTING
group = smsbox-route
smsbox-id = smsbox
smsc-id ="MT"

group = sendsms-user
username = smsg
password = smsg@123
default-smsc="MT"
concatenation= true
max-messages = 6


group = sms-service
keyword = default
url = 
http://10.130.250.58/receivesms.php?sender=%p=%b<http://10.130.250.58/receivesms.php?sender=%25p=%25b>
catch-all = true
max-messages = 1
text = "This is a reply"





Best regards

Amit Sharma (VAS)
Head, IN & VAS Operations Division
IT Shared Service Center, CORPORATE CENTER

Sistema Shyam Teleservices Limited
MTS Tower2 Building No. 313, Udyog Vihar Phase IV,Gurgaon

MTS+91 913 600 6473
Direct +91 124 481 2500
Email:   amit.shar...@mtsindia.in

[cid:image001.jpg@01D13688.031428C0]<http://www.mtsindia.in/>




This E-Mail may contain Confidential and/or legally privileged Information and 
is meant for the intend

Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

2015-12-14 Thread amalysh
Hi,

check your logs whether you received ACK/NACK for those sequence numbers and if 
not
ask by SMSC operator why you don’t receive ACK/NACK within > 60 sec.

Alex


> Am 14.12.2015 um 11:33 schrieb Amit Sharma (VAS) <amit.shar...@mtsindia.in>:
> 
> Hi,
> I am getting following error of “Not ACKED message found, will retransmit” 
> again and again due to which at times a single number receives multiple sms. 
> In below case “9142294005” number received 9 msgs.
>  
> Please suggest the reason for the below error & rectification to be done 
> accordingly.
>  
>  
> 2015-12-13 09:36:49 [15072] [18] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:37:55 [15072] [18] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
> will retransmit. SENT<66>sec. ago, SEQ<187878>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 09:40:16 [15072] [22] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:41:20 [15072] [22] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
> will retransmit. SENT<64>sec. ago, SEQ<189768>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 09:43:44 [15072] [8] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:46:04 [15072] [10] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:47:06 [15072] [10] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
> will retransmit. SENT<62>sec. ago, SEQ<189281>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 09:48:10 [15072] [16] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:49:17 [15072] [16] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
> will retransmit. SENT<67>sec. ago, SEQ<189655>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 09:51:18 [15072] [8] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:52:36 [15072] [8] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
> will retransmit. SENT<78>sec. ago, SEQ<188844>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 09:53:42 [15072] [20] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:56:09 [15072] [6] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:57:13 [15072] [6] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
> will retransmit. SENT<64>sec. ago, SEQ<189816>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 09:58:14 [15072] [8] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 09:59:15 [15072] [8] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
> will retransmit. SENT<61>sec. ago, SEQ<189177>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 10:01:47 [15072] [20] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 10:04:14 [15072] [20] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 10:05:23 [15072] [20] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
> will retransmit. SENT<69>sec. ago, SEQ<189456>, DST<9142294005>
> 2015-12-13 10:08:14 [15072] [12] DEBUG:   destination_addr: "9142294005"
> 2015-12-13 10:09:20 [15072] [12] WARNING: SMPP[MTS]: Not ACKED message found, 
> will retransmit. SENT<66>sec. ago, SEQ<190251>, DST<9142294005>
>  
> Configuration is as follows:
>  
> group = core
> admin-port = 13010
> smsbox-port = 13012
> log-file = "/u03/kannel/logs/bearerbox.log"
> box-allow-ip = "10.130.252.160,127.0.0.1"
> access-log = "/u03/kannel/logs/bearerbox_access.log"
> dlr-storage = internal
>  
> ##TX-1##
> group = smsc
> smsc-id ="MT"
> smsc = smpp
> host =10.10.22.10
> port = 5016
> system-type = "INAPPS"
> interface-version = 34
> receive-port =0
> source-addr-ton = 1
> source-addr-npi = 1 
> dest-addr-ton = 1
> dest-addr-npi = 1
> keepalive = 30
> log-level =0
> throughput = 50
> max-pending-submits=50
> reconnect-delay = 60
> reroute = true
> log-file = "/u03/kannel/logs/smsc_conn.log"
>  
>  
> ##RX-1
> group = smsc
> smsc-id ="MTS"
> smsc = smpp
> host =10.10.22.10
> port = 0
> system-type = "INAPPS"
> receive-port =5016
> interface-version = 34
> source-addr-ton = 1
> source-addr-npi = 1
> dest-addr-ton = 1
> dest-addr-npi = 1
> keepalive = 30
> log-level =0
> reconnect-delay = 60
> reroute = true
> log-file = "/u03/kannel/logs/smsc_conn.log"
>  
> group = smsbox
> bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
> sendsms-port = 13013
> global-sender = YD-MTS
> log-file = "/u03/kannel/logs/smsbox.log"
> log-level = 0
>  
> #SMSBOX ROUTING
> group = smsbox-route
> smsbox-id = smsbox
> smsc-id ="MT"
>  
> group = sendsms-user
> username = smsg
> password = smsg@123
> default-smsc=&q

Re: Messages not being delivered - Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

2014-11-30 Thread Eric Magutu
bumping this to dev

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 The telco says he is getting missed enquiry link

 On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 here is an extract from the logs.


 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: time to sleep 30.00
 secs.
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x866f3c0 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x86691f0 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x866ee08 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x8666ef8 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent

 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x8621140 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x866ed38 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x8673f58 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x8669300 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x866f3c0 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: clear_old_concat_parts called
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: throughput
 (0.00,10.00)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 2 = 0x0002
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_id: 2147483669 =
 0x8015
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link_resp
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xb3e0e7d0 dump:
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Sending PDU:
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 2 = 0x0002
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_id: 21 = 0x0015
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xb3e0edd8 dump:
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Got PDU:
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: throughput
 (0.00,10.00)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ426, DST
 +4545318
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ425, DST
 +9569818
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ424, DST
 +4322763
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ423, DST
 +4762896
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ422, DST
 +4366488
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ421, DST
 +4264317
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ420, DST
 +4366488
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ419, DST
 +4765807
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 428 =
 0x01ac
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_id: 21 = 0x0015
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xb3e0fa80 dump:
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Sending enquire
 link:

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 I should mention some messages go through others don't. Will increase
 debugging level and revert.
 On Nov 6, 2014 5:19 PM, Tapan Kumar Thapa

Re: Messages not being delivered - Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

2014-11-07 Thread Eric Magutu
Hi,
here is an extract from the logs.


2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: time to sleep 30.00
secs.
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
(0x866f3c0 vs 0x866f3c0)
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
(0x86691f0 vs 0x866f3c0)
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
(0x866ee08 vs 0x866f3c0)
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
(0x8666ef8 vs 0x866f3c0)
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent

2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
(0x8621140 vs 0x866f3c0)
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
(0x866ed38 vs 0x866f3c0)
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
(0x8673f58 vs 0x866f3c0)
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
(0x8669300 vs 0x866f3c0)
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
(0x866f3c0 vs 0x866f3c0)
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: clear_old_concat_parts called
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: throughput
(0.00,10.00)
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 2 = 0x0002
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_id: 2147483669 =
0x8015
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link_resp
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xb3e0e7d0 dump:
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Sending PDU:
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 2 = 0x0002
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_id: 21 = 0x0015
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xb3e0edd8 dump:
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Got PDU:
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: throughput
(0.00,10.00)
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ426, DST
+4545318
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ425, DST
+9569818
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ424, DST
+4322763
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ423, DST
+4762896
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ422, DST
+4366488
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ421, DST
+4264317
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ420, DST
+4366488
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ419, DST
+4765807
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 428 = 0x01ac
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_id: 21 = 0x0015
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xb3e0fa80 dump:
2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Sending enquire
link:

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 I should mention some messages go through others don't. Will increase
 debugging level and revert.
 On Nov 6, 2014 5:19 PM, Tapan Kumar Thapa tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 As suggested by other user as well, try enabling debug logs and see what
 is the issue. if unable to understand debug output than paste here.

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yes
 On Nov 6, 2014 5:16 PM, Tapan Kumar Thapa

Re: Messages not being delivered - Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

2014-11-07 Thread Eric Magutu
The telco says he is getting missed enquiry link

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 4:30 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 here is an extract from the logs.


 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: time to sleep 30.00
 secs.
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x866f3c0 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x86691f0 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x866ee08 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x8666ef8 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent

 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x8621140 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x866ed38 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x8673f58 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x8669300 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: re-queing SMS not-yet-to-be resent
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: sms_router: handling message
 (0x866f3c0 vs 0x866f3c0)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [14] DEBUG: clear_old_concat_parts called
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: throughput
 (0.00,10.00)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 2 = 0x0002
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_id: 2147483669 =
 0x8015
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link_resp
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xb3e0e7d0 dump:
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Sending PDU:
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 2 = 0x0002
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_id: 21 = 0x0015
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xb3e0edd8 dump:
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Got PDU:
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: throughput
 (0.00,10.00)
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ426, DST
 +4545318
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ425, DST
 +9569818
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ424, DST
 +4322763
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ423, DST
 +4762896
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ422, DST
 +4366488
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ421, DST
 +4264317
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ420, DST
 +4366488
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] WARNING: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT120sec. ago, SEQ419, DST
 +4765807
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 428 = 0x01ac
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   command_id: 21 = 0x0015
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG:   type_name: enquire_link
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xb3e0fa80 dump:
 2014-11-06 14:39:45 [22646] [13] DEBUG: SMPP[dd-jm-test]: Sending enquire
 link:

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 I should mention some messages go through others don't. Will increase
 debugging level and revert.
 On Nov 6, 2014 5:19 PM, Tapan Kumar Thapa tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 As suggested by other user as well, try enabling debug

Messages not being delivered - Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

2014-11-06 Thread Eric Magutu
Hi,
I am running Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Oct 12 2014
04:19:47', compiler `4.6.3'. System Linux, release 3.2.0-70-virtual,
version #105-Ubuntu

My messages are not being delivered and I am getting the following error

Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

When I do a tcpdump (attached) I can see the a lot of TCP Retransmission
messages from my service provider followed by SMPP Enquire_link, Unbind

Can someone assist me to figure out what is going on?

Does my Enquire_link interval have to match the service provider?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/z1royw0rwyjfsdh/jm.pcap


-- 
Regards,
Eric Magutu


jm.pcap
Description: application/vnd.tcpdump.pcap


Re: Messages not being delivered - Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

2014-11-06 Thread Tapan Kumar Thapa
No sure..But Is your SMPP connection working fine?

Please also post your kannel config.

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 I am running Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Oct 12 2014
 04:19:47', compiler `4.6.3'. System Linux, release 3.2.0-70-virtual,
 version #105-Ubuntu

 My messages are not being delivered and I am getting the following error

 Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

 When I do a tcpdump (attached) I can see the a lot of TCP Retransmission
 messages from my service provider followed by SMPP Enquire_link, Unbind

 Can someone assist me to figure out what is going on?

 Does my Enquire_link interval have to match the service provider?

 https://www.dropbox.com/s/z1royw0rwyjfsdh/jm.pcap


 --
 Regards,
 Eric Magutu



Re: Messages not being delivered - Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

2014-11-06 Thread Eric Magutu
Hi,
Here is my config

#
# dd-JM TEST SMSC
#

group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = dd-jm-test
allowed-smsc-id = dd-jm-test
host = 172.16.2.7
#host = 172.16.2.59
port = 4000
transceiver-mode = 1
source-addr-ton = 3
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
smsc-username = 
smsc-password = 
system-type = SMPP
alt-charset = UTF-8
enquire-link-interval = 60
throughput = 10
#
# dd JM smsbox DIY
#

group = smsbox
smsbox-id = dd-jm-diy
#bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
bearerbox-host = localhost
log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-jm-smsbox-diy.log
sendsms-port = 6089
sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-

#
# dd JM smsbox staging
#

group = smsbox
smsbox-id = dd-jm-staging
#bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
bearerbox-host = localhost
log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-jm-smsbox-staging.log
sendsms-port = 6090
sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-

#
# dd JM smsbox staging
#

group = smsbox
smsbox-id = dd-jm-staging2
#bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
bearerbox-host = localhost
log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-jm-smsbox-staging2.log
sendsms-port = 6091
sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-




#
# dd JM smsbox-route staging 2
#


group = smsbox-route
smsbox-id = dd-jm-staging2
smsc-id = dd-jm-test
shortcode = 164;+164

#
# dd smsbox staging
#

group = smsbox
smsbox-id = dd-staging
#bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
bearerbox-host = localhost
log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-smsbox-staging.log
sendsms-port = 6092
sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-


On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Tapan Kumar Thapa tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 No sure..But Is your SMPP connection working fine?

 Please also post your kannel config.

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 I am running Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Oct 12 2014
 04:19:47', compiler `4.6.3'. System Linux, release 3.2.0-70-virtual,
 version #105-Ubuntu

 My messages are not being delivered and I am getting the following error

 Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

 When I do a tcpdump (attached) I can see the a lot of TCP Retransmission
 messages from my service provider followed by SMPP Enquire_link, Unbind

 Can someone assist me to figure out what is going on?

 Does my Enquire_link interval have to match the service provider?

 https://www.dropbox.com/s/z1royw0rwyjfsdh/jm.pcap


 --
 Regards,
 Eric Magutu





-- 
Regards,
Eric Magutu


Re: Messages not being delivered - Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

2014-11-06 Thread Tapan Kumar Thapa
In the admin interface of kannel, is smpp connection up?

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 Here is my config

 #
 # dd-JM TEST SMSC
 #

 group = smsc
 smsc = smpp
 smsc-id = dd-jm-test
 allowed-smsc-id = dd-jm-test
 host = 172.16.2.7
 #host = 172.16.2.59
 port = 4000
 transceiver-mode = 1
 source-addr-ton = 3
 source-addr-npi = 1
 dest-addr-ton = 1
 dest-addr-npi = 1
 smsc-username = 
 smsc-password = 
 system-type = SMPP
 alt-charset = UTF-8
 enquire-link-interval = 60
 throughput = 10
 #
 # dd JM smsbox DIY
 #

 group = smsbox
 smsbox-id = dd-jm-diy
 #bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
 bearerbox-host = localhost
 log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-jm-smsbox-diy.log
 sendsms-port = 6089
 sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-

 #
 # dd JM smsbox staging
 #

 group = smsbox
 smsbox-id = dd-jm-staging
 #bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
 bearerbox-host = localhost
 log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-jm-smsbox-staging.log
 sendsms-port = 6090
 sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-

 #
 # dd JM smsbox staging
 #

 group = smsbox
 smsbox-id = dd-jm-staging2
 #bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
 bearerbox-host = localhost
 log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-jm-smsbox-staging2.log
 sendsms-port = 6091
 sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-




 #
 # dd JM smsbox-route staging 2
 #


 group = smsbox-route
 smsbox-id = dd-jm-staging2
 smsc-id = dd-jm-test
 shortcode = 164;+164

 #
 # dd smsbox staging
 #

 group = smsbox
 smsbox-id = dd-staging
 #bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
 bearerbox-host = localhost
 log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-smsbox-staging.log
 sendsms-port = 6092
 sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-


 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Tapan Kumar Thapa 
 tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com wrote:

 No sure..But Is your SMPP connection working fine?

 Please also post your kannel config.

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 I am running Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Oct 12 2014
 04:19:47', compiler `4.6.3'. System Linux, release 3.2.0-70-virtual,
 version #105-Ubuntu

 My messages are not being delivered and I am getting the following error

 Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

 When I do a tcpdump (attached) I can see the a lot of TCP Retransmission
 messages from my service provider followed by SMPP Enquire_link, Unbind

 Can someone assist me to figure out what is going on?

 Does my Enquire_link interval have to match the service provider?

 https://www.dropbox.com/s/z1royw0rwyjfsdh/jm.pcap


 --
 Regards,
 Eric Magutu





 --
 Regards,
 Eric Magutu



RE: Messages not being delivered - Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

2014-11-06 Thread Lam Nguyen Tuong
Turn the smsc log on with level 0 is easier for trouble shouting.
Anway, try source-addr-ton = 0, perhaps your up stream doesn't not allow other 
values.

::Lamnt.

From: emag...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:56:34 +0300
Subject: Re: Messages not being delivered - Not ACKED message found, will 
retransmit.
To: tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com
CC: users@kannel.org

Hi,Here is my config
## dd-JM TEST SMSC#
group = smscsmsc = smppsmsc-id = dd-jm-testallowed-smsc-id = 
dd-jm-testhost = 172.16.2.7 #host = 172.16.2.59 port = 4000transceiver-mode = 
1source-addr-ton = 3source-addr-npi = 1dest-addr-ton = 1dest-addr-npi = 
1smsc-username = smsc-password = system-type = SMPPalt-charset = 
UTF-8enquire-link-interval = 60throughput = 10## dd JM smsbox DIY#
group = smsboxsmsbox-id = dd-jm-diy#bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1bearerbox-host 
= localhostlog-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-jm-smsbox-diy.logsendsms-port = 
6089sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-
## dd JM smsbox staging#
group = smsboxsmsbox-id = dd-jm-staging#bearerbox-host = 
127.0.0.1bearerbox-host = localhostlog-file = 
/var/log/kannel/dd-jm-smsbox-staging.logsendsms-port = 6090sendsms-chars = 
0123456789 +-
## dd JM smsbox staging#
group = smsboxsmsbox-id = dd-jm-staging2#bearerbox-host = 
127.0.0.1bearerbox-host = localhostlog-file = 
/var/log/kannel/dd-jm-smsbox-staging2.logsendsms-port = 6091sendsms-chars = 
0123456789 +-



## dd JM smsbox-route staging 2#

group = smsbox-routesmsbox-id = dd-jm-staging2smsc-id = dd-jm-testshortcode 
= 164;+164
## dd smsbox staging#
group = smsboxsmsbox-id = dd-staging#bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1bearerbox-host 
= localhostlog-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-smsbox-staging.logsendsms-port = 
6092sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Tapan Kumar Thapa tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com 
wrote:
No sure..But Is your SMPP connection working fine?

Please also post your kannel config.

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,I am running Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Oct 12 2014 04:19:47', 
compiler `4.6.3'. System Linux, release 3.2.0-70-virtual, version #105-Ubuntu
My messages are not being delivered and I am getting the following error 
Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.
When I do a tcpdump (attached) I can see the a lot of TCP Retransmission 
messages from my service provider followed by SMPP Enquire_link, Unbind
Can someone assist me to figure out what is going on? 
Does my Enquire_link interval have to match the service provider? 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/z1royw0rwyjfsdh/jm.pcap
-- 
Regards,
Eric Magutu






-- 
Regards,
Eric Magutu

  

Re: Messages not being delivered - Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

2014-11-06 Thread Tapan Kumar Thapa
As suggested by other user as well, try enabling debug logs and see what is
the issue. if unable to understand debug output than paste here.

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yes
 On Nov 6, 2014 5:16 PM, Tapan Kumar Thapa tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 In the admin interface of kannel, is smpp connection up?

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 Here is my config

 #
 # dd-JM TEST SMSC
 #

 group = smsc
 smsc = smpp
 smsc-id = dd-jm-test
 allowed-smsc-id = dd-jm-test
 host = 172.16.2.7
 #host = 172.16.2.59
 port = 4000
 transceiver-mode = 1
 source-addr-ton = 3
 source-addr-npi = 1
 dest-addr-ton = 1
 dest-addr-npi = 1
 smsc-username = 
 smsc-password = 
 system-type = SMPP
 alt-charset = UTF-8
 enquire-link-interval = 60
 throughput = 10
 #
 # dd JM smsbox DIY
 #

 group = smsbox
 smsbox-id = dd-jm-diy
 #bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
 bearerbox-host = localhost
 log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-jm-smsbox-diy.log
 sendsms-port = 6089
 sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-

 #
 # dd JM smsbox staging
 #

 group = smsbox
 smsbox-id = dd-jm-staging
 #bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
 bearerbox-host = localhost
 log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-jm-smsbox-staging.log
 sendsms-port = 6090
 sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-

 #
 # dd JM smsbox staging
 #

 group = smsbox
 smsbox-id = dd-jm-staging2
 #bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
 bearerbox-host = localhost
 log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-jm-smsbox-staging2.log
 sendsms-port = 6091
 sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-




 #
 # dd JM smsbox-route staging 2
 #


 group = smsbox-route
 smsbox-id = dd-jm-staging2
 smsc-id = dd-jm-test
 shortcode = 164;+164

 #
 # dd smsbox staging
 #

 group = smsbox
 smsbox-id = dd-staging
 #bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
 bearerbox-host = localhost
 log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-smsbox-staging.log
 sendsms-port = 6092
 sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-


 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Tapan Kumar Thapa 
 tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com wrote:

 No sure..But Is your SMPP connection working fine?

 Please also post your kannel config.

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 I am running Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Oct 12 2014
 04:19:47', compiler `4.6.3'. System Linux, release 3.2.0-70-virtual,
 version #105-Ubuntu

 My messages are not being delivered and I am getting the following
 error

 Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

 When I do a tcpdump (attached) I can see the a lot of TCP
 Retransmission messages from my service provider followed by SMPP
 Enquire_link, Unbind

 Can someone assist me to figure out what is going on?

 Does my Enquire_link interval have to match the service provider?

 https://www.dropbox.com/s/z1royw0rwyjfsdh/jm.pcap


 --
 Regards,
 Eric Magutu





 --
 Regards,
 Eric Magutu





Re: Messages not being delivered - Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

2014-11-06 Thread Eric Magutu
I should mention some messages go through others don't. Will increase
debugging level and revert.
On Nov 6, 2014 5:19 PM, Tapan Kumar Thapa tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com
wrote:

 As suggested by other user as well, try enabling debug logs and see what
 is the issue. if unable to understand debug output than paste here.

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 Yes
 On Nov 6, 2014 5:16 PM, Tapan Kumar Thapa tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com
 wrote:

 In the admin interface of kannel, is smpp connection up?

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 Here is my config

 #
 # dd-JM TEST SMSC
 #

 group = smsc
 smsc = smpp
 smsc-id = dd-jm-test
 allowed-smsc-id = dd-jm-test
 host = 172.16.2.7
 #host = 172.16.2.59
 port = 4000
 transceiver-mode = 1
 source-addr-ton = 3
 source-addr-npi = 1
 dest-addr-ton = 1
 dest-addr-npi = 1
 smsc-username = 
 smsc-password = 
 system-type = SMPP
 alt-charset = UTF-8
 enquire-link-interval = 60
 throughput = 10
 #
 # dd JM smsbox DIY
 #

 group = smsbox
 smsbox-id = dd-jm-diy
 #bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
 bearerbox-host = localhost
 log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-jm-smsbox-diy.log
 sendsms-port = 6089
 sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-

 #
 # dd JM smsbox staging
 #

 group = smsbox
 smsbox-id = dd-jm-staging
 #bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
 bearerbox-host = localhost
 log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-jm-smsbox-staging.log
 sendsms-port = 6090
 sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-

 #
 # dd JM smsbox staging
 #

 group = smsbox
 smsbox-id = dd-jm-staging2
 #bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
 bearerbox-host = localhost
 log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-jm-smsbox-staging2.log
 sendsms-port = 6091
 sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-




 #
 # dd JM smsbox-route staging 2
 #


 group = smsbox-route
 smsbox-id = dd-jm-staging2
 smsc-id = dd-jm-test
 shortcode = 164;+164

 #
 # dd smsbox staging
 #

 group = smsbox
 smsbox-id = dd-staging
 #bearerbox-host = 127.0.0.1
 bearerbox-host = localhost
 log-file = /var/log/kannel/dd-smsbox-staging.log
 sendsms-port = 6092
 sendsms-chars = 0123456789 +-


 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Tapan Kumar Thapa 
 tapan.thapa2...@gmail.com wrote:

 No sure..But Is your SMPP connection working fine?

 Please also post your kannel config.

 On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Eric Magutu emag...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi,
 I am running Kannel bearerbox version `1.4.4'. Build `Oct 12 2014
 04:19:47', compiler `4.6.3'. System Linux, release 3.2.0-70-virtual,
 version #105-Ubuntu

 My messages are not being delivered and I am getting the following
 error

 Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.

 When I do a tcpdump (attached) I can see the a lot of TCP
 Retransmission messages from my service provider followed by SMPP
 Enquire_link, Unbind

 Can someone assist me to figure out what is going on?

 Does my Enquire_link interval have to match the service provider?

 https://www.dropbox.com/s/z1royw0rwyjfsdh/jm.pcap


 --
 Regards,
 Eric Magutu





 --
 Regards,
 Eric Magutu






Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

2009-03-10 Thread hafez ahmad
Dears Falko, Nikos,

Thanks for your kind help, my configuration was like that:

group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = MOCONN
host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
port = 0
receive-port = 8000
smsc-username = X
smsc-password = XXX
system-type = 
allowed-smsc-id = MOCONN
interface-version = 34
address-range = 
reconnect-delay = 10
source-addr-ton = 1
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
bind-addr-ton = 1
bind-addr-npi = 1
msg-id-type = 0x01
log-file = /var/log/mo.log

group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = MTCONN
host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
port = 8000
receive-port = 0
smsc-username = X
smsc-password = XXX
system-type = 
allowed-smsc-id = MTCONN
interface-version = 34
address-range = 
reconnect-delay = 10
source-addr-ton = 1
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
bind-addr-ton = 1
bind-addr-npi = 1
msg-id-type = 0x01
log-file = /var/log/mt.log

after that I make the transmitter and receiver in one SMSC group like that

smsc = smpp
smsc-id = MYCONN
host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
port = 8000
receive-port = 8000
smsc-username = X
smsc-password = XXX
keepalive = 10
enquire-link-interval = 10
system-type = 
allowed-smsc-id = MYCONN
interface-version = 34
address-range = 
reconnect-delay = 10
source-addr-ton = 5
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
bind-addr-ton = 1
bind-addr-npi = 1
msg-id-type = 0x01
log-file = /var/log/conn.log

but I still get the error in the logs  until I changed the source-addr-npi =
1 to be source-addr-npi = 5.

by the way is there different if I configure the transmitter and receiver
in one SMSC group or 2 SMSC group?


Thanks for help.
Regards,
Hafez



On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote:

 By the way, I just realised: transmitter and receiver? Are you using SMPP
 3.3 instead of 3.4? Have you configured the receiver and transmitter in the
 same SMSC group?Normal SMPP 3.4 shouldn't have transmitter and receiver
 but only one transceiver. If you use 3.3 with divided transmitter and
 receiver connection, you need to configure both inside the same smsc-group,
 otherwise kannel cannot associate the ACK. (Well, no smsc I have seen so far
 could do this...)

 Falko

 Am 10.03.2009 um 00:26 schrieb Falko Ziemann:

 I just saw this behavior once before. There a service provider routed the
 ACK to another large account. So I send the message on MYMTCONN1 and
 received the ACK on MYMTCONN2. That's not the case, or? I can't see it
 from the log, the first line where kannel states the connection name is
 missing.
 But I really don't have a idea what this problem should have to do with
 keep alives. Are you loosing the connection between the submit and the ACK?

 Falko

 Am 09.03.2009 um 21:13 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:

  Well, there is an enquire-link-interval which you could tweak. It
 defaults to 30.

 BR,
 Nikos

 - Original Message -
 *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com
 *To:* Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com
 *Cc:* users@kannel.org
 *Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2009 3:43 PM
 *Subject:* Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

 Dears,

 I still have the same problem, Any Ideas? , by they my operator advice me
 that * * *use “ESME_QRYLINK” on both transmitter and receiver to keep the
 connection live* may be that related to this error .

 Please advice.

 Regards,
 Hafez

 On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hmm, sorry, no idea. Seems like kannel forgets about the ack...
 A hotfix would be to set wait-ack-expire = 0x02 in the smsc group. That
 would make kannel waiting forever for the ACK and never retry.
 Very dirty hack, but should do the job until someone comes around with a
 better solution...

 Regards
 Falko

  Am 05.03.2009 um 13:37 schrieb hafez ahmad:

  Sorry, thats the correct

 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump:
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_id: 4 = 0x0004
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 3684 =
 0x0e64
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   service_type: V
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 5 = 0x0005
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr: T2ME
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   esm_class: 67 = 0x0043
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 = 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
 2009-03-03

Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

2009-03-10 Thread Falko Ziemann

Hi,

try to delete the receive-port from the config and set:
transceiver-mode = on

I'm not sure how kannel handles the notification problem. The MT gets  
send on the MTCONN while the DLR arrives on the MOCONN. I don't know  
if kannel can assign the DLR to message when they arrive in two  
diffrent SMSCs, but I don't think that this works. Maybe the same  
problem with ACKs ?!


Regards
Falko

Am 10.03.2009 um 10:00 schrieb hafez ahmad:


Dears Falko, Nikos,

Thanks for your kind help, my configuration was like that:

group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = MOCONN
host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
port = 0
receive-port = 8000
smsc-username = X
smsc-password = XXX
system-type = 
allowed-smsc-id = MOCONN
interface-version = 34
address-range = 
reconnect-delay = 10
source-addr-ton = 1
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
bind-addr-ton = 1
bind-addr-npi = 1
msg-id-type = 0x01
log-file = /var/log/mo.log

group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = MTCONN
host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
port = 8000
receive-port = 0
smsc-username = X
smsc-password = XXX
system-type = 
allowed-smsc-id = MTCONN
interface-version = 34
address-range = 
reconnect-delay = 10
source-addr-ton = 1
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
bind-addr-ton = 1
bind-addr-npi = 1
msg-id-type = 0x01
log-file = /var/log/mt.log

after that I make the transmitter and receiver in one SMSC group  
like that


smsc = smpp
smsc-id = MYCONN
host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
port = 8000
receive-port = 8000
smsc-username = X
smsc-password = XXX
keepalive = 10
enquire-link-interval = 10
system-type = 
allowed-smsc-id = MYCONN
interface-version = 34
address-range = 
reconnect-delay = 10
source-addr-ton = 5
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
bind-addr-ton = 1
bind-addr-npi = 1
msg-id-type = 0x01
log-file = /var/log/conn.log

but I still get the error in the logs  until I changed the source- 
addr-npi = 1 to be source-addr-npi = 5.


by the way is there different if I configure the transmitter and  
receiver in one SMSC group or 2 SMSC group?



Thanks for help.
Regards,
Hafez



On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com  
wrote:
By the way, I just realised: transmitter and receiver? Are you  
using SMPP 3.3 instead of 3.4? Have you configured the receiver and  
transmitter in the same SMSC group?
Normal SMPP 3.4 shouldn't have transmitter and receiver but only one  
transceiver. If you use 3.3 with divided transmitter and receiver  
connection, you need to configure both inside the same smsc-group,  
otherwise kannel cannot associate the ACK. (Well, no smsc I have  
seen so far could do this...)


Falko

Am 10.03.2009 um 00:26 schrieb Falko Ziemann:

I just saw this behavior once before. There a service provider  
routed the ACK to another large account. So I send the message on  
MYMTCONN1 and received the ACK on MYMTCONN2. That's not the  
case, or? I can't see it from the log, the first line where kannel  
states the connection name is missing.


But I really don't have a idea what this problem should have to do  
with keep alives. Are you loosing the connection between the submit  
and the ACK?


Falko

Am 09.03.2009 um 21:13 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:

Well, there is an enquire-link-interval which you could tweak.  
It defaults to 30.


BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: hafez ahmad
To: Falko Ziemann
Cc: users@kannel.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

Dears,

I still have the same problem, Any Ideas? , by they my operator  
advice me that  use “ESME_QRYLINK” on both transmitter and  
receiver to keep the connection live may be that related to this  
error .


Please advice.

Regards,
Hafez

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com  
wrote:

Hmm, sorry, no idea. Seems like kannel forgets about the ack...

A hotfix would be to set wait-ack-expire = 0x02 in the smsc  
group. That would make kannel waiting forever for the ACK and  
never retry.
Very dirty hack, but should do the job until someone comes around  
with a better solution...


Regards
Falko

Am 05.03.2009 um 13:37 schrieb hafez ahmad:


Sorry, thats the correct

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_id: 4 = 0x0004
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 =  
0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 3684 =  
0x0e64

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   service_type: V
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 5 =  
0x0005
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 0 =  
0x

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr: T2ME
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 =  
0x0001
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 =  
0x0001
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825

Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

2009-03-10 Thread hafez ahmad
Hi,


 try to delete the receive-port from the config and set:
 transceiver-mode = on


 I tried before but my operator disable the transceiver mode from his side.


 I'm not sure how kannel handles the notification problem. The MT gets send
 on the MTCONN while the DLR arrives on the MOCONN. I don't know if kannel
 can assign the DLR to message when they arrive in two diffrent SMSCs, but I
 don't think that this works. Maybe the same problem with ACKs ?!


 for the DLR that send using MT and received with another MO, I have it
before and I solved it using the DLR group id batch,

now every thing works fine, but I will monitor and update the list.

Regards and many thanks for help.
Hafez


Am 10.03.2009 um 10:00 schrieb hafez ahmad:

 Dears Falko, Nikos,

 Thanks for your kind help, my configuration was like that:

 group = smsc
 smsc = smpp
 smsc-id = MOCONN
 host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
 port = 0
 receive-port = 8000
 smsc-username = X
 smsc-password = XXX
 system-type = 
 allowed-smsc-id = MOCONN
 interface-version = 34
 address-range = 
 reconnect-delay = 10
 source-addr-ton = 1
 source-addr-npi = 1
 dest-addr-ton = 1
 dest-addr-npi = 1
 bind-addr-ton = 1
 bind-addr-npi = 1
 msg-id-type = 0x01
 log-file = /var/log/mo.log

 group = smsc
 smsc = smpp
 smsc-id = MTCONN
 host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
 port = 8000
 receive-port = 0
 smsc-username = X
 smsc-password = XXX
 system-type = 
 allowed-smsc-id = MTCONN
 interface-version = 34
 address-range = 
 reconnect-delay = 10
 source-addr-ton = 1
 source-addr-npi = 1
 dest-addr-ton = 1
 dest-addr-npi = 1
 bind-addr-ton = 1
 bind-addr-npi = 1
 msg-id-type = 0x01
 log-file = /var/log/mt.log

 after that I make the transmitter and receiver in one SMSC group like that

 smsc = smpp
 smsc-id = MYCONN
 host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
 port = 8000
 receive-port = 8000
 smsc-username = X
 smsc-password = XXX
 keepalive = 10
 enquire-link-interval = 10
 system-type = 
 allowed-smsc-id = MYCONN
 interface-version = 34
 address-range = 
 reconnect-delay = 10
 source-addr-ton = 5
 source-addr-npi = 1
 dest-addr-ton = 1
 dest-addr-npi = 1
 bind-addr-ton = 1
 bind-addr-npi = 1
 msg-id-type = 0x01
 log-file = /var/log/conn.log

 but I still get the error in the logs  until I changed the source-addr-npi
 = 1 to be source-addr-npi = 5.

 by the way is there different if I configure the transmitter and receiver
 in one SMSC group or 2 SMSC group?


 Thanks for help.
 Regards,
 Hafez



 On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote:

 By the way, I just realised: transmitter and receiver? Are you using
 SMPP 3.3 instead of 3.4? Have you configured the receiver and transmitter in
 the same SMSC group? Normal SMPP 3.4 shouldn't have transmitter and
 receiver but only one transceiver. If you use 3.3 with divided transmitter
 and receiver connection, you need to configure both inside the same
 smsc-group, otherwise kannel cannot associate the ACK. (Well, no smsc I have
 seen so far could do this...)

 Falko

 Am 10.03.2009 um 00:26 schrieb Falko Ziemann:

 I just saw this behavior once before. There a service provider routed the
 ACK to another large account. So I send the message on MYMTCONN1 and
 received the ACK on MYMTCONN2. That's not the case, or? I can't see it
 from the log, the first line where kannel states the connection name is
 missing.
 But I really don't have a idea what this problem should have to do with
 keep alives. Are you loosing the connection between the submit and the ACK?

 Falko

 Am 09.03.2009 um 21:13 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:

  Well, there is an enquire-link-interval which you could tweak. It
 defaults to 30.

 BR,
 Nikos

 - Original Message -
  *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com
  *To:* Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com
  *Cc:* users@kannel.org
  *Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2009 3:43 PM
  *Subject:* Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

 Dears,

 I still have the same problem, Any Ideas? , by they my operator advice me
 that * * *use “ESME_QRYLINK” on both transmitter and receiver to keep
 the connection live* may be that related to this error .

 Please advice.

 Regards,
 Hafez

 On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hmm, sorry, no idea. Seems like kannel forgets about the ack...
  A hotfix would be to set wait-ack-expire = 0x02 in the smsc group.
 That would make kannel waiting forever for the ACK and never retry.
 Very dirty hack, but should do the job until someone comes around with a
 better solution...

 Regards
 Falko

  Am 05.03.2009 um 13:37 schrieb hafez ahmad:

  Sorry, thats the correct

 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump:
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_id: 4 = 0x0004
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 3684 =
 0x0e64
 2009-03-03 21:00

Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

2009-03-10 Thread seikath

Hello ppl,

I just detected similar issue:

2009-03-10 12:37:02 [23769] [10] WARNING: SMPP[sir]: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit. 
SENT96sec. ago, SEQ20582, DST+359888deleteddigitshere

I can confirm the issue is at the SMSC side, because the issue apeared after 
migration to a new SMPP proxy/loadbalancer the telco has implemented.

Hope to save some time of yours with this info.

cheers


hafez ahmad wrote:

Hi,



try to delete the receive-port from the config and set:
transceiver-mode = on



 I tried before but my operator disable the transceiver mode from his side.



I'm not sure how kannel handles the notification problem. The MT gets send
on the MTCONN while the DLR arrives on the MOCONN. I don't know if kannel
can assign the DLR to message when they arrive in two diffrent SMSCs, but I
don't think that this works. Maybe the same problem with ACKs ?!



 for the DLR that send using MT and received with another MO, I have it
before and I solved it using the DLR group id batch,

now every thing works fine, but I will monitor and update the list.

Regards and many thanks for help.
Hafez


Am 10.03.2009 um 10:00 schrieb hafez ahmad:

Dears Falko, Nikos,

Thanks for your kind help, my configuration was like that:

group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = MOCONN
host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
port = 0
receive-port = 8000
smsc-username = X
smsc-password = XXX
system-type = 
allowed-smsc-id = MOCONN
interface-version = 34
address-range = 
reconnect-delay = 10
source-addr-ton = 1
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
bind-addr-ton = 1
bind-addr-npi = 1
msg-id-type = 0x01
log-file = /var/log/mo.log

group = smsc
smsc = smpp
smsc-id = MTCONN
host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
port = 8000
receive-port = 0
smsc-username = X
smsc-password = XXX
system-type = 
allowed-smsc-id = MTCONN
interface-version = 34
address-range = 
reconnect-delay = 10
source-addr-ton = 1
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
bind-addr-ton = 1
bind-addr-npi = 1
msg-id-type = 0x01
log-file = /var/log/mt.log

after that I make the transmitter and receiver in one SMSC group like that

smsc = smpp
smsc-id = MYCONN
host = xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
port = 8000
receive-port = 8000
smsc-username = X
smsc-password = XXX
keepalive = 10
enquire-link-interval = 10
system-type = 
allowed-smsc-id = MYCONN
interface-version = 34
address-range = 
reconnect-delay = 10
source-addr-ton = 5
source-addr-npi = 1
dest-addr-ton = 1
dest-addr-npi = 1
bind-addr-ton = 1
bind-addr-npi = 1
msg-id-type = 0x01
log-file = /var/log/conn.log

but I still get the error in the logs  until I changed the source-addr-npi
= 1 to be source-addr-npi = 5.

by the way is there different if I configure the transmitter and receiver
in one SMSC group or 2 SMSC group?


Thanks for help.
Regards,
Hafez



On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote:


By the way, I just realised: transmitter and receiver? Are you using
SMPP 3.3 instead of 3.4? Have you configured the receiver and transmitter in
the same SMSC group? Normal SMPP 3.4 shouldn't have transmitter and
receiver but only one transceiver. If you use 3.3 with divided transmitter
and receiver connection, you need to configure both inside the same
smsc-group, otherwise kannel cannot associate the ACK. (Well, no smsc I have
seen so far could do this...)

Falko

Am 10.03.2009 um 00:26 schrieb Falko Ziemann:

I just saw this behavior once before. There a service provider routed the
ACK to another large account. So I send the message on MYMTCONN1 and
received the ACK on MYMTCONN2. That's not the case, or? I can't see it
from the log, the first line where kannel states the connection name is
missing.
But I really don't have a idea what this problem should have to do with
keep alives. Are you loosing the connection between the submit and the ACK?

Falko

Am 09.03.2009 um 21:13 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:

 Well, there is an enquire-link-interval which you could tweak. It
defaults to 30.

BR,
Nikos

- Original Message -
 *From:* hafez ahmad hafezad...@gmail.com
 *To:* Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com
 *Cc:* users@kannel.org
 *Sent:* Monday, March 09, 2009 3:43 PM
 *Subject:* Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

Dears,

I still have the same problem, Any Ideas? , by they my operator advice me
that * * *use “ESME_QRYLINK” on both transmitter and receiver to keep
the connection live* may be that related to this error .

Please advice.

Regards,
Hafez

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote:


Hmm, sorry, no idea. Seems like kannel forgets about the ack...
 A hotfix would be to set wait-ack-expire = 0x02 in the smsc group.
That would make kannel waiting forever for the ACK and never retry.
Very dirty hack, but should do the job until someone comes around with a
better solution...

Regards
Falko

 Am 05.03.2009 um 13:37 schrieb hafez ahmad:

 Sorry, thats the correct

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump

Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

2009-03-09 Thread hafez ahmad
:   type_name: submit_sm
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_id: 4 = 0x0004
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 3684 =
 0x0e64
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   service_type: V
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 5 = 0x0005
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr: T2ME
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   esm_class: 67 = 0x0043
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 = 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 0 =
 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   replace_if_present_flag: 0 =
 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   data_coding: 8 = 0x0008
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sm_length: 140 = 0x008c
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   short_message:
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string at 0xa732af00:
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  len:  140
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  size: 1024
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  immutable: 0
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 05 00 03 83 04 01 06 23
 06 47 06 45 00 20 06 48   ...#.G.E. .H
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 35 06 41 06 27 06 2a
 00 20 06 4a 06 48 06 33   .5.A.'.*. .J.H.3
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 41 00 20 06 27 06 44
 06 34 06 31 06 41 06 27   .A. .'.D.4.1.A.'
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 21 00 20 06 44 06 39
 06 44 06 27 06 2c 00 20   .!. .D.9.D.'.,.
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 27 06 44 06 43 06 48
 06 44 06 4a 06 33 06 2a   .'.D.C.H.D.J.3.*
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 31 06 48 06 44 00 3a
 00 20 06 2a 06 24 06 2e   .1.H.D.:. .*.$..
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 30 00 20 06 46 06 33
 06 28 00 20 06 45 06 2a   .0. .F.3.(. .E.*
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 33 06 27 06 48 06 4a
 06 29 00 20 06 45 06 46   .3.'.H.J.). .E.F
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 00 20 06 27 06 44 06 44
 06 48 06 32   . .'.D.D.H.2
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string dump ends.
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   more_messages_to_send: 1 =
 0x0001
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Got PDU:
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump:
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm_resp
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_id: 2147483652 =
 0x8004
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 3680 =
 0x0e60
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   message_id: 4129215894
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Manually forced
 source addr ton = 5, source add npi = 1
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Manually forced
 dest addr ton = 1, dest add npi = 1
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Sending PDU:


 BR,
 Hafez

 On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote:

 It looks like your SMPP service provider hasn't send a correct ACK for
 the message but delivered it.
 Please take a look in the smpp-logfile, what you provider answered to the
 submit_sm. Strongly looks like an error on your providers side.

 Regards
 Falko

 Am 05.03.2009 um 10:40 schrieb hafez ahmad:


  Hi All,


 Hope your all doing well, I have the following warning in my logs,

 2009-03-04 16:45:56 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT62sec. ago, SEQ11674,
 DST+
 2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11684,
 DST+9888
 2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11685,
 DST+
 2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11686,
 DST+
 2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP

Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

2009-03-09 Thread Nikos Balkanas
Well, there is an enquire-link-interval which you could tweak. It defaults to 
30.

BR,
Nikos
  - Original Message - 
  From: hafez ahmad 
  To: Falko Ziemann 
  Cc: users@kannel.org 
  Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 3:43 PM
  Subject: Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit


  Dears, 

  I still have the same problem, Any Ideas? , by they my operator advice me 
that  use “ESME_QRYLINK” on both transmitter and receiver to keep the 
connection live may be that related to this error .

  Please advice.

  Regards,
  Hafez


  On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote:

Hmm, sorry, no idea. Seems like kannel forgets about the ack...


A hotfix would be to set wait-ack-expire = 0x02 in the smsc group. That 
would make kannel waiting forever for the ACK and never retry.
Very dirty hack, but should do the job until someone comes around with a 
better solution...


Regards
Falko


Am 05.03.2009 um 13:37 schrieb hafez ahmad:


  Sorry, thats the correct

  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump:
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_id: 4 = 0x0004
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 3684 = 
0x0e64
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   service_type: V
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 5 = 0x0005
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr: T2ME
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   esm_class: 67 = 0x0043
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 = 0x
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 0 = 
0x
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   replace_if_present_flag: 0 = 
0x
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   data_coding: 8 = 0x0008
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sm_length: 140 = 0x008c
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   short_message:
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string at 0xa732af00:
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  len:  140
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  size: 1024
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  immutable: 0
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 05 00 03 83 04 01 06 23 
06 47 06 45 00 20 06 48   ...#.G.E. .H
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 35 06 41 06 27 06 2a 
00 20 06 4a 06 48 06 33   .5.A.'.*. .J.H.3
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 41 00 20 06 27 06 44 
06 34 06 31 06 41 06 27   .A. .'.D.4.1.A.'
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 21 00 20 06 44 06 39 
06 44 06 27 06 2c 00 20   .!. .D.9.D.'.,.
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 27 06 44 06 43 06 48 
06 44 06 4a 06 33 06 2a   .'.D.C.H.D.J.3.*
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 31 06 48 06 44 00 3a 
00 20 06 2a 06 24 06 2e   .1.H.D.:. .*.$..
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 30 00 20 06 46 06 33 
06 28 00 20 06 45 06 2a   .0. .F.3.(. .E.*
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 33 06 27 06 48 06 4a 
06 29 00 20 06 45 06 46   .3.'.H.J.). .E.F
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 00 20 06 27 06 44 06 44 
06 48 06 32   . .'.D.D.H.2
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string dump ends.
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   more_messages_to_send: 1 = 
0x0001
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.




  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Got PDU:
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump:
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm_resp
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_id: 2147483652 = 
0x8004
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 3684 = 
0x0e64
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   message_id: 4129216897
  2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.


  Regards,
  Hafez


  On Thu

Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

2009-03-09 Thread Falko Ziemann
I just saw this behavior once before. There a service provider routed  
the ACK to another large account. So I send the message on MYMTCONN1  
and received the ACK on MYMTCONN2. That's not the case, or? I can't  
see it from the log, the first line where kannel states the connection  
name is missing.


But I really don't have a idea what this problem should have to do  
with keep alives. Are you loosing the connection between the submit  
and the ACK?


Falko

Am 09.03.2009 um 21:13 schrieb Nikos Balkanas:

Well, there is an enquire-link-interval which you could tweak. It  
defaults to 30.


BR,
Nikos
- Original Message -
From: hafez ahmad
To: Falko Ziemann
Cc: users@kannel.org
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

Dears,

I still have the same problem, Any Ideas? , by they my operator  
advice me that  use “ESME_QRYLINK” on both transmitter and receiver  
to keep the connection live may be that related to this error .


Please advice.

Regards,
Hafez

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com  
wrote:

Hmm, sorry, no idea. Seems like kannel forgets about the ack...

A hotfix would be to set wait-ack-expire = 0x02 in the smsc group.  
That would make kannel waiting forever for the ACK and never retry.
Very dirty hack, but should do the job until someone comes around  
with a better solution...


Regards
Falko

Am 05.03.2009 um 13:37 schrieb hafez ahmad:


Sorry, thats the correct

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_id: 4 = 0x0004
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 =  
0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 3684 =  
0x0e64

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   service_type: V
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 5 =  
0x0005
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 0 =  
0x

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr: T2ME
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 =  
0x0001
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 =  
0x0001
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   destination_addr:  


2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   esm_class: 67 = 0x0043
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 =  
0x

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 0 =  
0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   replace_if_present_flag: 0  
= 0x

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   data_coding: 8 = 0x0008
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0 =  
0x

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sm_length: 140 = 0x008c
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   short_message:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string at 0xa732af00:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  len:  140
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  size: 1024
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  immutable: 0
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 05 00 03 83 04 01  
06 23 06 47 06 45 00 20 06 48   ...#.G.E. .H
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 35 06 41 06 27  
06 2a 00 20 06 4a 06 48 06 33   .5.A.'.*. .J.H.3
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 41 00 20 06 27  
06 44 06 34 06 31 06 41 06 27   .A. .'.D.4.1.A.'
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 21 00 20 06 44  
06 39 06 44 06 27 06 2c 00 20   .!. .D.9.D.'.,.
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 27 06 44 06 43  
06 48 06 44 06 4a 06 33 06 2a   .'.D.C.H.D.J.3.*
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 31 06 48 06 44  
00 3a 00 20 06 2a 06 24 06 2e   .1.H.D.:. .*.$..
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 30 00 20 06 46  
06 33 06 28 00 20 06 45 06 2a   .0. .F.3.(. .E.*
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 33 06 27 06 48  
06 4a 06 29 00 20 06 45 06 46   .3.'.H.J.). .E.F
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 00 20 06 27 06 44  
06 44 06 48 06 32   . .'.D.D.H.2

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string dump ends.
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   more_messages_to_send: 1 =  
0x0001

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.




2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Got PDU:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm_resp
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_id: 2147483652 =  
0x8004
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 =  
0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825

Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

2009-03-05 Thread hafez ahmad
Hi All,


Hope your all doing well, I have the following warning in my logs,

2009-03-04 16:45:56 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT62sec. ago, SEQ11674,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11684,
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11685,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11686,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11682,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11683,
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11693,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT89sec. ago, SEQ11694,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT89sec. ago, SEQ11695,
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11691,
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11692,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:50:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11701,
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:50:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11702,
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:50:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT89sec. ago, SEQ11703,
DST+
2009-03-04 16:50:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11699,
DST+



some users like the user +, received the SMS 2 times and every
time he is billed, I search about the problem and I found the following
code:

case SMPP_WAITACK_REQUEUE: /* requeue */
 smpp_msg = dict_remove(smpp-sent_msgs, key);
 if (smpp_msg != NULL) {
 warning(0, SMPP[%s]: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit.
 SENT%ldsec. ago, SEQ%s, DST%s,
octstr_get_cstr(smpp-conn-id),
(long)difftime(now, smpp_msg-sent_time) ,
octstr_get_cstr(key),
octstr_get_cstr(smpp_msg-msg-sms.receiver));
 bb_smscconn_send_failed(smpp-conn, smpp_msg-msg,
SMSCCONN_FAILED_TEMPORARILY,NULL);
 smpp_msg_destroy(smpp_msg, 0);
 (*pending_submits)--;
 }

As I understand from the code that the connection was down so kannel
requeue  the SMS, is that right? and how can I be sure that the user will
get the SMS only one time? please advice.


BR,
Hafez


Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

2009-03-05 Thread Falko Ziemann
It looks like your SMPP service provider hasn't send a correct ACK for  
the message but delivered it.
Please take a look in the smpp-logfile, what you provider answered to  
the submit_sm. Strongly looks like an error on your providers side.


Regards
Falko

Am 05.03.2009 um 10:40 schrieb hafez ahmad:


Hi All,


Hope your all doing well, I have the following warning in my logs,

2009-03-04 16:45:56 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT62sec. ago, SEQ11674,  
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11684,  
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11685,  
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11686,  
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11682,  
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11683,  
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11693,  
DST+
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT89sec. ago, SEQ11694,  
DST+
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT89sec. ago, SEQ11695,  
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11691,  
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11692,  
DST+
2009-03-04 16:50:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11701,  
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:50:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11702,  
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:50:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT89sec. ago, SEQ11703,  
DST+
2009-03-04 16:50:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11699,  
DST+




some users like the user +, received the SMS 2 times and  
every time he is billed, I search about the problem and I found the  
following code:


case SMPP_WAITACK_REQUEUE: /* requeue */
 smpp_msg = dict_remove(smpp-sent_msgs, key);
 if (smpp_msg != NULL) {
 warning(0, SMPP[%s]: Not ACKED message found, will  
retransmit.

 SENT%ldsec. ago, SEQ%s, DST%s,
octstr_get_cstr(smpp-conn-id),
(long)difftime(now, smpp_msg-sent_time) ,
octstr_get_cstr(key),
octstr_get_cstr(smpp_msg-msg-sms.receiver));
 bb_smscconn_send_failed(smpp-conn, smpp_msg-msg,  
SMSCCONN_FAILED_TEMPORARILY,NULL);

 smpp_msg_destroy(smpp_msg, 0);
 (*pending_submits)--;
 }

As I understand from the code that the connection was down so kannel  
requeue  the SMS, is that right? and how can I be sure that the user  
will get the SMS only one time? please advice.



BR,
Hafez





Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

2009-03-05 Thread hafez ahmad
Dear falko,

Thanks for reply I check the submit_sm_respon and I think everything works
fine, Please advice, this is my log

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_id: 4 = 0x0004
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 3684 = 0x0e64
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   service_type: V
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 5 = 0x0005
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 0 = 0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr: T2ME
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   destination_addr: 
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   esm_class: 67 = 0x0043
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 = 0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 0 = 0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   replace_if_present_flag: 0 =
0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   data_coding: 8 = 0x0008
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sm_length: 140 = 0x008c
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   short_message:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string at 0xa732af00:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  len:  140
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  size: 1024
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  immutable: 0
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 05 00 03 83 04 01 06 23 06
47 06 45 00 20 06 48   ...#.G.E. .H
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 35 06 41 06 27 06 2a 00
20 06 4a 06 48 06 33   .5.A.'.*. .J.H.3
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 41 00 20 06 27 06 44 06
34 06 31 06 41 06 27   .A. .'.D.4.1.A.'
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 21 00 20 06 44 06 39 06
44 06 27 06 2c 00 20   .!. .D.9.D.'.,.
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 27 06 44 06 43 06 48 06
44 06 4a 06 33 06 2a   .'.D.C.H.D.J.3.*
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 31 06 48 06 44 00 3a 00
20 06 2a 06 24 06 2e   .1.H.D.:. .*.$..
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 30 00 20 06 46 06 33 06
28 00 20 06 45 06 2a   .0. .F.3.(. .E.*
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 33 06 27 06 48 06 4a 06
29 00 20 06 45 06 46   .3.'.H.J.). .E.F
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 00 20 06 27 06 44 06 44 06
48 06 32   . .'.D.D.H.2
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string dump ends.
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   more_messages_to_send: 1 =
0x0001
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Got PDU:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm_resp
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_id: 2147483652 = 0x8004
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 3680 = 0x0e60
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   message_id: 4129215894
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Manually forced
source addr ton = 5, source add npi = 1
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Manually forced dest
addr ton = 1, dest add npi = 1
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Sending PDU:


BR,
Hafez

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote:

 It looks like your SMPP service provider hasn't send a correct ACK for the
 message but delivered it.
 Please take a look in the smpp-logfile, what you provider answered to the
 submit_sm. Strongly looks like an error on your providers side.

 Regards
 Falko

 Am 05.03.2009 um 10:40 schrieb hafez ahmad:


  Hi All,


 Hope your all doing well, I have the following warning in my logs,

 2009-03-04 16:45:56 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT62sec. ago, SEQ11674,
 DST+
 2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11684,
 DST+9888
 2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11685,
 DST+
 2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING

Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

2009-03-05 Thread Falko Ziemann

Nope  take a closer look:

submit_sm:

sequence_number: 3684 = 0x0e64


submit_sm_resp:

sequence_number: 3680 = 0x0e60


That's not the ACK for the message you have posted but for 4 messages  
earlier.


Regards
Falko

Am 05.03.2009 um 12:10 schrieb hafez ahmad:


Dear falko,

Thanks for reply I check the submit_sm_respon and I think everything  
works fine, Please advice, this is my log


2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_id: 4 = 0x0004
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 =  
0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 3684 =  
0x0e64

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   service_type: V
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 5 =  
0x0005
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 0 =  
0x

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr: T2ME
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 = 0x0001
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 = 0x0001
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   destination_addr:  


2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   esm_class: 67 = 0x0043
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 = 0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 0 =  
0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   replace_if_present_flag: 0  
= 0x

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   data_coding: 8 = 0x0008
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0 =  
0x

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sm_length: 140 = 0x008c
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   short_message:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string at 0xa732af00:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  len:  140
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  size: 1024
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  immutable: 0
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 05 00 03 83 04 01  
06 23 06 47 06 45 00 20 06 48   ...#.G.E. .H
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 35 06 41 06 27  
06 2a 00 20 06 4a 06 48 06 33   .5.A.'.*. .J.H.3
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 41 00 20 06 27  
06 44 06 34 06 31 06 41 06 27   .A. .'.D.4.1.A.'
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 21 00 20 06 44  
06 39 06 44 06 27 06 2c 00 20   .!. .D.9.D.'.,.
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 27 06 44 06 43  
06 48 06 44 06 4a 06 33 06 2a   .'.D.C.H.D.J.3.*
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 31 06 48 06 44  
00 3a 00 20 06 2a 06 24 06 2e   .1.H.D.:. .*.$..
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 30 00 20 06 46  
06 33 06 28 00 20 06 45 06 2a   .0. .F.3.(. .E.*
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 33 06 27 06 48  
06 4a 06 29 00 20 06 45 06 46   .3.'.H.J.). .E.F
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 00 20 06 27 06 44  
06 44 06 48 06 32   . .'.D.D.H.2

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string dump ends.
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   more_messages_to_send: 1 =  
0x0001

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Got PDU:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm_resp
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_id: 2147483652 =  
0x8004
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 =  
0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 3680 =  
0x0e60

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   message_id: 4129215894
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Manually  
forced source addr ton = 5, source add npi = 1
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Manually  
forced dest addr ton = 1, dest add npi = 1

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Sending PDU:


BR,
Hafez

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com  
wrote:
It looks like your SMPP service provider hasn't send a correct ACK  
for the message but delivered it.
Please take a look in the smpp-logfile, what you provider answered  
to the submit_sm. Strongly looks like an error on your providers side.


Regards
Falko

Am 05.03.2009 um 10:40 schrieb hafez ahmad:


Hi All,


Hope your all doing well, I have the following warning in my logs,

2009-03-04 16:45:56 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT62sec. ago, SEQ11674,  
DST+
2009

Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

2009-03-05 Thread hafez ahmad
-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   esm_class: 67 = 0x0043
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 = 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 0 =
 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   replace_if_present_flag: 0 =
 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   data_coding: 8 = 0x0008
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0 = 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sm_length: 140 = 0x008c
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   short_message:
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string at 0xa732af00:
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  len:  140
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  size: 1024
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  immutable: 0
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 05 00 03 83 04 01 06 23
 06 47 06 45 00 20 06 48   ...#.G.E. .H
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 35 06 41 06 27 06 2a
 00 20 06 4a 06 48 06 33   .5.A.'.*. .J.H.3
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 41 00 20 06 27 06 44
 06 34 06 31 06 41 06 27   .A. .'.D.4.1.A.'
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 21 00 20 06 44 06 39
 06 44 06 27 06 2c 00 20   .!. .D.9.D.'.,.
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 27 06 44 06 43 06 48
 06 44 06 4a 06 33 06 2a   .'.D.C.H.D.J.3.*
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 31 06 48 06 44 00 3a
 00 20 06 2a 06 24 06 2e   .1.H.D.:. .*.$..
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 30 00 20 06 46 06 33
 06 28 00 20 06 45 06 2a   .0. .F.3.(. .E.*
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 33 06 27 06 48 06 4a
 06 29 00 20 06 45 06 46   .3.'.H.J.). .E.F
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 00 20 06 27 06 44 06 44
 06 48 06 32   . .'.D.D.H.2
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string dump ends.
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   more_messages_to_send: 1 =
 0x0001
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Got PDU:
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump:
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm_resp
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_id: 2147483652 =
 0x8004
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 = 0x
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 3680 = 0x0e60
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   message_id: 4129215894
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Manually forced
 source addr ton = 5, source add npi = 1
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Manually forced dest
 addr ton = 1, dest add npi = 1
 2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Sending PDU:


 BR,
 Hafez

 On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com wrote:

 It looks like your SMPP service provider hasn't send a correct ACK for the
 message but delivered it.
 Please take a look in the smpp-logfile, what you provider answered to the
 submit_sm. Strongly looks like an error on your providers side.

 Regards
 Falko

 Am 05.03.2009 um 10:40 schrieb hafez ahmad:


  Hi All,


 Hope your all doing well, I have the following warning in my logs,

 2009-03-04 16:45:56 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT62sec. ago, SEQ11674,
 DST+
 2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11684,
 DST+9888
 2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11685,
 DST+
 2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11686,
 DST+
 2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11682,
 DST+
 2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11683,
 DST+9888
 2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. ago, SEQ11693,
 DST+
 2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT89sec. ago, SEQ11694,
 DST+
 2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not ACKED
 message found, will retransmit. SENT89sec. ago, SEQ11695,
 DST+9888
 2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING

Re: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit

2009-03-05 Thread Falko Ziemann
] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_ton: 5 =  
0x0005
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr_npi: 0 =  
0x

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   source_addr: T2ME
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_ton: 1 =  
0x0001
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   dest_addr_npi: 1 =  
0x0001
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   destination_addr:  


2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   esm_class: 67 = 0x0043
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   protocol_id: 0 = 0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   priority_flag: 0 =  
0x

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   schedule_delivery_time: NULL
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   validity_period: NULL
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   registered_delivery: 0 =  
0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   replace_if_present_flag: 0  
= 0x

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   data_coding: 8 = 0x0008
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sm_default_msg_id: 0 =  
0x

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sm_length: 140 = 0x008c
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   short_message:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string at 0xa732af00:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  len:  140
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  size: 1024
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  immutable: 0
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 05 00 03 83 04 01  
06 23 06 47 06 45 00 20 06 48   ...#.G.E. .H
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 35 06 41 06 27  
06 2a 00 20 06 4a 06 48 06 33   .5.A.'.*. .J.H.3
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 41 00 20 06 27  
06 44 06 34 06 31 06 41 06 27   .A. .'.D.4.1.A.'
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 21 00 20 06 44  
06 39 06 44 06 27 06 2c 00 20   .!. .D.9.D.'.,.
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 27 06 44 06 43  
06 48 06 44 06 4a 06 33 06 2a   .'.D.C.H.D.J.3.*
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 31 06 48 06 44  
00 3a 00 20 06 2a 06 24 06 2e   .1.H.D.:. .*.$..
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 30 00 20 06 46  
06 33 06 28 00 20 06 45 06 2a   .0. .F.3.(. .E.*
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 06 33 06 27 06 48  
06 4a 06 29 00 20 06 45 06 46   .3.'.H.J.). .E.F
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:  data: 00 20 06 27 06 44  
06 44 06 48 06 32   . .'.D.D.H.2

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:Octet string dump ends.
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   more_messages_to_send: 1 =  
0x0001

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Got PDU:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU 0xa732ad00 dump:
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   type_name: submit_sm_resp
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_id: 2147483652 =  
0x8004
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   command_status: 0 =  
0x
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   sequence_number: 3680 =  
0x0e60

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG:   message_id: 4129215894
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP PDU dump ends.
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Manually  
forced source addr ton = 5, source add npi = 1
2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Manually  
forced dest addr ton = 1, dest add npi = 1

2009-03-03 21:00:16 [2825] [14] DEBUG: SMPP[MYMTCONN]: Sending PDU:


BR,
Hafez

On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Falko Ziemann fal...@gmail.com  
wrote:
It looks like your SMPP service provider hasn't send a correct ACK  
for the message but delivered it.
Please take a look in the smpp-logfile, what you provider answered  
to the submit_sm. Strongly looks like an error on your providers  
side.


Regards
Falko

Am 05.03.2009 um 10:40 schrieb hafez ahmad:


Hi All,


Hope your all doing well, I have the following warning in my logs,

2009-03-04 16:45:56 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT62sec. ago, SEQ11674,  
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11684,  
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11685,  
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11686,  
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11682,  
DST+
2009-03-04 16:47:24 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT88sec. ago, SEQ11683,  
DST+9888
2009-03-04 16:48:54 [2825] [14] WARNING: SMPP[MT_CONNICTION]: Not  
ACKED message found

Not ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT...

2008-02-27 Thread gerandong
hi,

i have warning for smpp sending,

WARNING: SMPP[*]: Not ACKED message found, will retransmit. SENT90sec. 
ago, SEQ71, DST6*9

then the sending is about 1minute / msg :((
and store file is big.

please help...

thanks

gerandong