Re: [QE-users] Can QE calculate the exchange energy and correlation energy separately?

2019-01-17 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
In order to separate exchange and correlation energies, one has to modify
the code, because the two contributions are separately computed but
immediately summed,

Paolo

On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 1:05 PM Gui Wei <201707021...@cqu.edu.cn> wrote:

> Hi
> Recently, I found out in an article that the author calculated the Pauli
> repulsion between graphene and Ni(111),the calculations were carried out
> with the VASP software package.And I know exchange energy is associated
> with the Pauli exclusion principle,so can I think that the value of Pauli
> exclusion is equal to the exchange energy's?If my point of view is correct,
> how could I calculate it with QE6.3?
>
> https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jp210667f
>
>
> Wei gui
> School of Mechanical Engineering,Chongqing University, China
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users



-- 
Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] High symmetry point overlap problem.

2019-01-17 Thread Lorenzo Paulatto

Hello,
check the coordinates of the point in cartesian axes (just multiply the 
points in crystal axes by the matrix of the inverse lattice) and check 
the length of each segment of the path. It is likely that the fourth on 
is much longer than the others. I recommend using a number of points 
proportional to the length of each segment. This can be done in 3 lines 
in gnu/octave (or matlab, if you like the bling)


k=[0.821428571428571   0.339285714285
0.0   0.0   0.0
0.5   0.5   0.5
0.5   0.0   0.5
0.0   0.0   0.0
0.5   0.0   0.0
]

b=[ 2.281217 -1.317061  0.344551
0.00  2.634122  0.344551
   -2.281217 -1.317061  0.344551]

kk=k*b
norm(kk(1:4,:)-kk(2:5,:),2,"rows")


Of course, it would be better if the code worked in every case, but even 
the best algorithm to spot high-symmetry points breaks down with some a 
sufficiently extreme case.





On 1/17/19 7:15 PM, Vasilios Passias wrote:
Hello.  After running a band calculation for Bismuth Selenide, I 
encountered a problem with the high symmetry points:  two distinct high 
symmetry points, K and \Gamma, have the same x-coordinate value (i.e. 
the value on the horizontal axis on bandstructure plot) :


image.png

The k-space path I used was Γ→A→Γ→K→M. I have the band input here:

//
/ calculation = 'bands',/
/ restart_mode = 'from_scratch',/
/ pseudo_dir = '/home/passias2/qe-6.3/pseudo/',/
///
//
/ ibrav = 4,/
/ celldm(1) = 7.81969,/
/ celldm(3) = 6.92122,/
/ nat = 15,/
/ ntyp = 2,/
/ ecutwfc = 300.0,/
/ ecutrho = 1200.0,/
/ nbnd = 130/
///
//
/ conv_thr = 1.0d-8,/
/ mixing_beta = 0.1/
///
/ATOMIC_SPECIES/
/ Bi 208.980 Bi.pbe-dn-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF/
/ Se 78.971 Se.pbe-n-kjpaw_psl.0.2.UPF/
/
/
/ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal/
/ Se 0.00 0.00 0.00/
/ Bi 0.33 0.67 0.066/
/ Se 0.67 0.33 0.127/
/ Se 0.00 0.00 0.206/
/ Bi 0.33 0.67 0.267/
/ Se 0.67 0.33 0.333/
/ Bi 0.00 0.00 0.399/
/ Se 0.33 0.67 0.46/
/ Se 0.67 0.33 0.539/
/ Bi 0.00 0.00 0.6/
/ Se 0.33 0.67 0.666/
/ Bi 0.67 0.33 0.732/
/ Se 0.00 0.00 0.793/
/ Se 0.33 0.67 0.872/
/ Bi 0.67 0.33 0.933/
/
/
/K_POINTS crystal_b/
/ 5/
/  0.0 0.0 0.0 30/
/  0.0 0.0 0.5 30/
/  0.0 0.0 0.0 30/
/  0.7 -0. 0.0 30/
/  0.5 0.0 0.0 30/
/
/
Could this error be from choosing a point outside of the irreducible 
Brillouin zone?


Thank you for your time.
/
/


___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users



--
Lorenzo Paulatto - Paris
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] Question on CPMD

2019-01-17 Thread Riccardo Bertossa

dear LIANG,


when you run in the NVE you should have something like this:

if I am not wrong:

ekinc is the kinetic energy of the electrons

etot is the total potential energy (calculated with DFT)

econs is the energy that to make a good simulation you want to make as 
constant as possible, but it will oscillate because electrons have a 
mass and a kinetic energy, so it will never be constant.


econt is the constant of motion of the CP lagrangian, and this must 
always remain approximately constant, within the integration error of 
the verlet algorithm. If it is not constant your simulation is not good 
and you have to change some parameters.




best regards,

Riccardo Bertossa

SISSA


On 17/01/19 15:54, LEUNG Clarence wrote:

Dear QE users,

From CPMD, we can get    EKINC ETOT   ENTHAL ECONS  and ECONT of the 
system. Which one is the total energy of the system?

ETOT? or Ekinc + Etot ? or Etot - Ekinc ?

Thanks.

LIANG Xiongyi
City University of Hong Kong

___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[QE-users] gfortran vs intel lead to different results of electron-phonon coupling by ph.x

2019-01-17 Thread Arena Konta
 
 
Hi everyone,
 
Using the same input files (from one of the tutorials, step-by-step), I got 
different output files of dynamical matrices when using different intel 
compilators (Intel 13, Intel 15 and Intel 16). Only the results using GNU 
gfortran are correct. In all calculations, there is no significant error of 
freqs. In turn, all scf calculations (intel and gnu) also work fine.
 
Intel 15, QE 6.3
 
 q = (    0.0   0.0   0.0 )
 
 **
 freq (    1) =   0.485694 [THz] =  16.201000 [cm-1]
 (  0.833379  0.00 -0.410303  0.00  0.370314  0.00 )
 freq (    2) =   0.485694 [THz] =  16.201000 [cm-1]
 ( -0.037325  0.00  0.626695  0.00  0.778370  0.00 )
 freq (    3) =   0.485694 [THz] =  16.201000 [cm-1]
 ( -0.551441  0.00 -0.662499  0.00  0.506960  0.00 )
 
  
 Intel 16, QE 6.3
 q = (    0.0   0.0   0.0 )
 
 **
 freq (    1) =   0.485682 [THz] =  16.200616 [cm-1]
 ( -0.635098  0.00  0.108968  0.00  0.764707  0.00 )
 freq (    2) =   0.485682 [THz] =  16.200616 [cm-1]
 ( -0.688313  0.00 -0.529109  0.00 -0.496255  0.00 )
 freq (    3) =   0.485682 [THz] =  16.200616 [cm-1]
 (  0.350537  0.00 -0.841528  0.00  0.411040  0.00 )
 
 
 
 
 Intel 15, QE 6.2.1
  q = (    0.0   0.0   0.0 )
 
 **
 freq (    1) =   0.485689 [THz] =  16.200826 [cm-1]
 (  0.164642  0.00  0.968532  0.00 -0.186653  0.00 )
 freq (    2) =   0.485689 [THz] =  16.200826 [cm-1]
 (  0.014161  0.00  0.186894  0.00  0.982278  0.00 )
 freq (    3) =   0.485689 [THz] =  16.200826 [cm-1]
 ( -0.986252  0.00  0.164367  0.00 -0.017055  0.00 )
 
 
The gfortran results are correct and the same like ones in the tutorial:
 
 q = (    0.0   0.0   0.0 )
 
 **
 freq (    1) =   0.486780 [THz] =  16.237227 [cm-1]
 (  0.550619  0.00  0.765144  0.00 -0.333726  0.00 )
 freq (    2) =   0.486780 [THz] =  16.237227 [cm-1]
 (  0.063986  0.00  0.359925  0.00  0.930784  0.00 )
 freq (    3) =   0.486780 [THz] =  16.237227 [cm-1]
 ( -0.832301  0.00  0.533862 -0.00 -0.149223  0.00 )
 
 
Default compilations (We use Intel Xeon E5-2670):
DFLAGS =  -D__FFTW3 -D__MPI -D__SCALAPACK
MPIF90 = mpif90
F90   = ifort
CC = icc
F77    = ifort
CPP    = cpp
CPPFLAGS   = -P -traditional $(DFLAGS) $(IFLAGS)
CFLAGS = -O3 $(DFLAGS) $(IFLAGS)
F90FLAGS   = $(FFLAGS) -nomodule -fpp $(FDFLAGS) $(CUDA_F90FLAGS) $(IFLAGS) 
$(MODFLAGS)
FFLAGS = -O2 -assume byterecl -g -traceback
FFLAGS_NOOPT   = -O0 -assume byterecl -g -traceback
LD = mpif90
LDFLAGS    = -static-intel
LD_LIBS    =
BLAS_LIBS  =   -lmkl_intel_lp64  -lmkl_sequential -lmkl_core
BLAS_LIBS_SWITCH = external
LAPACK_LIBS    =
LAPACK_LIBS_SWITCH = external
SCALAPACK_LIBS = -lmkl_scalapack_lp64 -lmkl_blacs_openmpi_lp64
FFT_LIBS   =  -lfftw3
 
 
Everything run on 1 processor. Any suggestions?

Tnak you in advance.


Arena Konta
The Institute of Thermophysics in Novosibirsk Scientific Center

 
 
 

___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[QE-users] High symmetry point overlap problem.

2019-01-17 Thread Vasilios Passias
Hello.  After running a band calculation for Bismuth Selenide, I
encountered a problem with the high symmetry points:  two distinct high
symmetry points, K and \Gamma, have the same x-coordinate value (i.e. the
value on the horizontal axis on bandstructure plot) :

[image: image.png]

The k-space path I used was Γ→A→Γ→K→M.   I have the band input here:

**
* calculation = 'bands',*
* restart_mode = 'from_scratch',*
* pseudo_dir = '/home/passias2/qe-6.3/pseudo/',*
*/*
**
* ibrav = 4,*
* celldm(1) = 7.81969,*
* celldm(3) = 6.92122,*
* nat = 15,*
* ntyp = 2,*
* ecutwfc = 300.0,*
* ecutrho = 1200.0,*
* nbnd = 130*
*/*
**
* conv_thr = 1.0d-8,*
* mixing_beta = 0.1*
*/*
*ATOMIC_SPECIES*
* Bi 208.980 Bi.pbe-dn-kjpaw_psl.1.0.0.UPF*
* Se 78.971 Se.pbe-n-kjpaw_psl.0.2.UPF*

*ATOMIC_POSITIONS crystal*
* Se 0.00 0.00 0.00*
* Bi 0.33 0.67 0.066*
* Se 0.67 0.33 0.127*
* Se 0.00 0.00 0.206*
* Bi 0.33 0.67 0.267*
* Se 0.67 0.33 0.333*
* Bi 0.00 0.00 0.399*
* Se 0.33 0.67 0.46*
* Se 0.67 0.33 0.539*
* Bi 0.00 0.00 0.6*
* Se 0.33 0.67 0.666*
* Bi 0.67 0.33 0.732*
* Se 0.00 0.00 0.793*
* Se 0.33 0.67 0.872*
* Bi 0.67 0.33 0.933*

*K_POINTS crystal_b*
* 5*
*  0.0 0.0 0.0 30*
*  0.0 0.0 0.5 30*
*  0.0 0.0 0.0 30*
*  0.7 -0. 0.0 30*
*  0.5 0.0 0.0 30*

Could this error be from choosing a point outside of the irreducible
Brillouin zone?

Thank you for your time.
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[QE-users] Question on CPMD

2019-01-17 Thread LEUNG Clarence
Dear QE users,

From CPMD, we can getEKINC  ETOT   ENTHAL ECONS  and ECONT of the system. 
Which one is the total energy of the system?
ETOT? or Ekinc + Etot ? or Etot - Ekinc ?

Thanks.

LIANG Xiongyi
City University of Hong Kong
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] Error during compilation

2019-01-17 Thread Pietro Davide Delugas
Dear Redwan
doing troubleshooting at distance is quite cumbersome.

If you do
make clean
and then
make libfox
what do you get ?

regards
Pietro Delugas
SISSA - Trieste
MAX - European Center of Excellence


On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:13 PM Redwan Sajjad 
wrote:

> Paolo
>
> Thanks for the reply. I did *make clean* and then *make all*, I got the
> exact same error message regarding
> FoX. The FoX folder under qe-6.3 is empty. I am running Mac OS Sierra High
> and gfortran 6.3.0.
>
>
> /Redwan
>
> On 17 Jan, 2019, at 4:16 PM, Paolo Giannozzi 
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 6:04 AM Redwan Sajjad 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Then it terminates with the message Can’t open module file
>> ‘m_common_io.mod’.
>>
>
> the compilation of FoX hasn't been successful: "make clean", then
> recompile and look carefully for error messages
>
> Paolo
>
>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Redwan
>>
>>
>> On 17 Jan, 2019, at 8:22 AM, Redwan Sajjad 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>>
>> While compiling (make all) QE on Mac OS (Sierra High), I am getting the
>> following error
>> *clang: error: no such file or directory*
>> followed by a path where the QE folder is located. There are several
>> lines of the same errors containing different paths.
>>
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Redwan N. Sajjad
>> Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology.
>> Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh.
>>
>>
>> ___
>> users mailing list
>> users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
>> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
> --
> Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
> Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
> Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] Error during compilation

2019-01-17 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 12:13 PM Redwan Sajjad 
wrote:

Thanks for the reply. I did *make clean* and then *make all*, I got the
> exact same error message regarding
> FoX.
>

which error message? this one?

> Then it terminates with the message Can’t open module file
>> ‘m_common_io.mod’.
>>
> it just means that FoX has not been correctly compiled, it doesn't explain
why.  There must be a message explaining why  it wasn't compiled. Please
also try the patched 6.3 version in qe-6.3-backports:
https://github.com/QEF/q-e/tree/qe-6.3-backports

Paolo
-- 
Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] How to apply force to the atoms using cp.x

2019-01-17 Thread Giuseppe Mattioli



Dear Lu Hailin
You may use a variable-cell dynamics (i.e., 'VC-RELAX', 'VC-CP',  
'VC-CP-WF') with press=whatever in KBar and cell_dofree=z.

HTH
Giuseppe

Lu Hailin <415005...@qq.com> ha scritto:


Dear all,


How can I apply a vertical force  to the atoms  to model an applied  
pressure using Quantum Espresso 6.1. version on Linux, the value of  
which was varied from 500 MPa to 5 GPa .



I find that the code '"ATOMIC_FORCES"may make it,but the Ha/a.u.  
units is not MPa or GPa.



Any help would be appreciated.



Thank you!
Best regards,



--
KBar LU Hailin, Graduate Student

State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University



Chongqing 400044, China

Tel: (+86) 18362360286




GIUSEPPE MATTIOLI
CNR - ISTITUTO DI STRUTTURA DELLA MATERIA
Via Salaria Km 29,300 - C.P. 10
I-00015 - Monterotondo Scalo (RM)
Mob (*preferred*) +39 373 7305625
Tel + 39 06 90672342 - Fax +39 06 90672316
E-mail: 

___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users


[QE-users] positions at EPFL

2019-01-17 Thread Nicola Marzari




Dear QE Users,


this is a brief note to mention that we have several positions (7)
for postdocs/phds/software engineers - on the development side, on
high-throughput with QE, on AiiDA and Materials Cloud - all info at
http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/Openings


nicola


--
Prof Nicola Marzari, Chair of Theory and Simulation of Materials, EPFL
Director, National Centre for Competence in Research NCCR MARVEL, EPFL
http://theossrv1.epfl.ch/Main/Contact http://nccr-marvel.ch/en/project
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users


Re: [QE-users] [SUSPECTED SPAM-Ironport] Geometry of Transition state

2019-01-17 Thread PARISA ALAMDARI
Dear Giuseppe,
Thank you so much for your guide.
BR,
Parisa

On Thu, 17/01/2019 10:37 AM, Giuseppe Mattioli  
wrote:
> 
Dear Parisa
> You can use CI-NEB. Look into the documentation of the neb.x code and examples
> HTH
> Giuseppe
> 
> PARISA ALAMDARI " target="_blank"> ha scritto:
> 
> > ​Dear QS users,
> > I used constraint calulation using pw.x to find transition state in  
> > a reaction. Is there any way to maximize the energy of  this  
> > estimated TS?
> > Thanks for your guides,
> > Best Regards,
> > Parisa
> > AUT, Iran
> >
> > --
> > This email was Anti Virus checked by  Security Gateway.
> 
> 
> 
> GIUSEPPE MATTIOLI
> CNR - ISTITUTO DI STRUTTURA DELLA MATERIA
> Via Salaria Km 29,300 - C.P. 10
> I-00015 - Monterotondo Scalo (RM)
> Mob (*preferred*) +39 373 7305625
> Tel + 39 06 90672342 - Fax +39 06 90672316
> E-mail: " target="_blank">
> 
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
> --
> This email was Anti Virus checked by  Security Gateway.
> 
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[QE-users] How to apply force to the atoms using cp.x

2019-01-17 Thread Lu Hailin
Dear all,


How can I apply a vertical force  to the atoms  to model an applied pressure 
using Quantum Espresso 6.1. version on Linux, the value of which was varied 
from 500 MPa to 5 GPa .


I find that the code '"ATOMIC_FORCES"may make it,but the Ha/a.u. units is not 
MPa or GPa.


Any help would be appreciated.



Thank you!
Best regards,



--

LU Hailin, Graduate Student

State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Transmission, Chongqing University



Chongqing 400044, China

Tel: (+86) 18362360286___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] Error during compilation

2019-01-17 Thread Redwan Sajjad
Paolo

Thanks for the reply. I did *make clean* and then *make all*, I got the
exact same error message regarding
FoX. The FoX folder under qe-6.3 is empty. I am running Mac OS Sierra High
and gfortran 6.3.0.


/Redwan

On 17 Jan, 2019, at 4:16 PM, Paolo Giannozzi  wrote:

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 6:04 AM Redwan Sajjad 
wrote:

>
> Then it terminates with the message Can’t open module file
> ‘m_common_io.mod’.
>

the compilation of FoX hasn't been successful: "make clean", then recompile
and look carefully for error messages

Paolo


> Thanks.
>
> --
> Redwan
>
>
> On 17 Jan, 2019, at 8:22 AM, Redwan Sajjad  wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> While compiling (make all) QE on Mac OS (Sierra High), I am getting the
> following error
> *clang: error: no such file or directory*
> followed by a path where the QE folder is located. There are several lines
> of the same errors containing different paths.
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> --
> Redwan N. Sajjad
> Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology.
> Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh.
>
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users



-- 
Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222

___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] Error during compilation

2019-01-17 Thread Paolo Giannozzi
On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 6:04 AM Redwan Sajjad 
wrote:

>
> Then it terminates with the message Can’t open module file
> ‘m_common_io.mod’.
>

the compilation of FoX hasn't been successful: "make clean", then recompile
and look carefully for error messages

Paolo


> Thanks.
>
> --
> Redwan
>
>
> On 17 Jan, 2019, at 8:22 AM, Redwan Sajjad  wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> While compiling (make all) QE on Mac OS (Sierra High), I am getting the
> following error
> *clang: error: no such file or directory*
> followed by a path where the QE folder is located. There are several lines
> of the same errors containing different paths.
>
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> --
> Redwan N. Sajjad
> Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology.
> Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh.
>
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users



-- 
Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [QE-users] Geometry of Transition state

2019-01-17 Thread Guido Menichetti
Dear Parisa,

I used the PWneb package which implement the Nudged Elastic Band (NEB)
method to
explore the Potential energy surface (PES) looking for a TS.

You can start looking the package information
https://www.quantum-espresso.org/Doc/neb_user_guide.pdf
https://www.quantum-espresso.org/Doc/INPUT_NEB.html

HTH
Regards
G.

Il giorno gio 17 gen 2019 alle ore 10:28 PARISA ALAMDARI <
p.alamd...@aut.ac.ir> ha scritto:

> ​Dear QS users,
> I used constraint calulation using pw.x to find transition state in a
> reaction. Is there any way to maximize the energy of  this estimated TS?
> Thanks for your guides,
> Best Regards,
> Parisa
> AUT, Iran
>
> --
> This email was Anti Virus checked by  Security Gateway.
>
> ___
> users mailing list
> users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
> https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users



-- 
***
Guido Menichetti
Post-Doc researcher in Solid State Physics
Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia
Graphene Labs: Theory and technology of 2D materials
Address: Via Morego, 30, 16163 Genova
Email:   guido.meniche...@iit.it
 guido.meniche...@df.unipi.it
 menichetti.gu...@gmail.com

___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

[QE-users] Geometry of Transition state

2019-01-17 Thread PARISA ALAMDARI
​Dear QS users,
I used constraint calulation using pw.x to find transition state in a reaction. 
Is there any way to maximize the energy of  this estimated TS?
Thanks for your guides,
Best Regards,
Parisa
AUT, Iran

-- 
This email was Anti Virus checked by  Security Gateway.
___
users mailing list
users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users