Re: [videoblogging] Blip Down?
Yes, I'm seeing packets drop off at level3 in NY. Maybe emergency unscheduled maintenance? 8 ae-94-94.ebr4.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.253) 24.938 ms 21.773 ms ae-64-64.ebr4.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.241) 31.398 ms 9 ae-2.ebr4.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.135.186) 96.771 ms 89.771 ms 89.808 ms 10 ae-84-84.csw3.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.122) 94.994 ms 90.714 ms 90.732 ms 11 ae-3-89.edge2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.16.144) 83.342 ms 90.379 ms 83.555 ms 12 * * * On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Ron Watson k9d...@mac.com wrote: I can't seem to get through to Blip.tv. Can anyone else confirm this? Peace Ron Watson http://k9disc.blip.tv http://k9athlete.com http://discdogradio.com http://pawsitivevybe.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Blip Down?
http://theblog.blip.tv/post/222338660/network-outage Network Outage Our main Internet provider has acknowledged that a key piece of network equipment failed about 1 hour ago. Ive been working with them and the facility to track down the problem. Their engineering team is working on the problem and should have it resolved shortly. On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 8:59 PM, David King davidleek...@gmail.com wrote: Their blog says something about a network outage... David On Oct 24, 2009, at 8:26 PM, Eddie Codel ed...@eddie.com wrote: Yes, I'm seeing packets drop off at level3 in NY. Maybe emergency unscheduled maintenance? 8 ae-94-94.ebr4.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.253) 24.938 ms 21.773 ms ae-64-64.ebr4.SanJose1.Level3.net (4.69.134.241) 31.398 ms 9 ae-2.ebr4.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.135.186) 96.771 ms 89.771 ms 89.808 ms 10 ae-84-84.csw3.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.69.134.122) 94.994 ms 90.714 ms 90.732 ms 11 ae-3-89.edge2.NewYork1.Level3.net (4.68.16.144) 83.342 ms 90.379 ms 83.555 ms 12 * * * On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 8:08 PM, Ron Watson k9d...@mac.com wrote: I can't seem to get through to Blip.tv. Can anyone else confirm this? Peace Ron Watson http://k9disc.blip.tv http://k9athlete.com http://discdogradio.com http://pawsitivevybe.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:videoblogging-dig...@yahoogroups.com mailto:videoblogging-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: videoblogging-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Ze Frank and Creative Commons
I was luckily enough be invited to a research exchange seminar thing at the Institute for the Future yesterday. They're a nonprofit that does short and long term forecasting of trends among many online things, including video. Ze Frank was there and had a few things to say about Creative Commons and what he sees as appropriation of his content. I've known that Ze's been down on CC for awhile, mainly because he doesn't see CC helping independents get paid, but this is the first time I've seen him talk passionately about it in a room full of people. Would be curious if other creators here have similar thoughts. http://www.eddie.com/2009/05/15/ze-frank-debates-value-of-creative-commons/ -eddie [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: McCain on Blip = a Shame
Maybe, but they shouldn't be censored for any of it. Free speech is free speech. On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:04 PM, Michael Schaap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, maybe the word thug is incorrect. How about: deceivers, fibbers, fabricators, equivocators? Or are they just cheating, double-dealing; underhanded, crafty, cunning, devious, treacherous, unfair, unjust, dirty, unethical, immoral, dishonorable, untrustworthy, unscrupulous, unprincipled, amoral, false, untruthful, deceitful, deceiving, lying, mendacious, crooked, hinky, shady, tricky, sharp, shifty or more literary: perfidious? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Robyn Tippins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm also a 'stakeholder' by that regard and I am for McCain. I wouldn't call Obama, nor his campaign, a thug, no do I consider McCain, nor his campaign to be a thug. We learn by seeing all the viewpoints and I wouldn't want Obama's speech hampered in any way. How can I be proud to win if it came at the high cost of someone else's liberty/freedom? Politics is divisive, and many of us are never going to agree, but I support Obama's right (and smart) use of new media, as I support McCain's (though his use of new media is usually less inspired). Agree to disagree. Robyn -- Robyn Tippins 510-579-5558 cell Community Manager, Yahoo! Developer Network Sleepyblogger.com | Gamingandtech.com | twitter: duzins Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Spike Lee chats w/bloggers vloggers
I had the extreme luck of being included in a little roundtable qa with uber brilliant filmmaker Spike Lee yesterday. We asked him about the influences of social networks, online video distribution, cell phones, cheap shooting editing tools on film making. He's a bit of a Luddite when it comes to using these tools himself, but definitely sees the positive gamechanging nature of them for others. Here's an excerpt of the interview. http://tr.im/spikeleechat -eddie [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] YouTube HD
that's pretty cool! all that's needed now is a front-end app that will take a hi-res video, split it into fours, upload to YouTube and create the player web page. On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 9:17 AM, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Here's an interesting presentation of what could turn into Youtube HD: http://mrdoob.com/lab/youtube/superHD/ -- Schlomo Rabinowitz http://schlomo.tv - finally moving to wordpress http://hatfactory.net - relaxed coworking AIM:schlomochat [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] are you at the RNC??
TheUptake has also been doing an amazing job covering the preemptive police raids on protesters yesterday. Go Chuck! http://theuptake.org/ On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:36 AM, noel hidalgo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if any of you are at the RNC, i would love to meet up and chat. please fire off an email or call me. otherwise, you should note that TheUptake.org has awesome office. i love these guys/gals! noneck Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Contribute to a Spike Lee movie with your cell phone
Hi video freaks. Please excuse the commercial interruption but I think some of you might be interested in this. I've been working on a project with Nokia and Spike Lee with the goal of creating a short movie (10-20 minutes) from users with cell phones. The overall theme of the piece is HUMANITY and it's broken down into three acts, Birth, Life and Death. The theme and framework is Spike's idea. We are now in the third and final act, Death, and to encourage greater participation we are challenging people to remake or swede (as in Be Kind, Rewind) death scenes from their favorite movies using their cell phones. I am one of five assistant directors who are working to cull through the bullshit and try to highlight some of the good stuff as well as guide people through the submission process. The stuff submitted so far hasn't really been stellar, so this is where you come in. The five ADs each get to pick someone from the pool of submissions to fly out to the movie's premiere in LA in October. Hotels and flights all covered by Nokia, anywhere within the continental US that is. You'll get the satisfaction of seeing your remake possibly making it into the final cut, hang out in LA and shmooze it up with Spike Lee. The catch is you need to have your sweded scene done and uploaded to the Nokia Productions site by August 20th, which is in like 10 days. Any cell phone is fair game, doesn't have to be Nokia. I'm not getting paid for any of this but am being compensated with the use of a couple loaner phones and the promise of being flown down to LA for the premiere and of course, getting to work with Spike Lee. I'm sure Spike is getting paid for his image being used though he genuinely likes the idea of a collaborative film where anyone can participate. Hopefully, he'll still love it when it comes time to edit everything. I encourage anyone to give it a shot and shoot me an email if you need help getting going. Also point me to your stuff when it's up so I can take a look. I'd love to be able to give away the LA trip to someone on this list. You LA people should do it too, I'm sure Nokia will pop for your bus fair! More details and how to upload your content is on the Nokia Productions site, which uses Jumpcut for video hosting/remixing. Make sure to tag your submission 'famousdeathscenes' so it'll be considered for the free trip. http://www.nokiaproductions.com/ Thanks!! -eddie [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Fwd: BlipTV Down....
No problems here on the west coast at 3:06PM PST. -eddie On Feb 12, 2008 2:20 PM, Patrick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone: Is it just me or is anyone else having trouble raising the BlipTV website? Cheers :D -- Pat Cook Denver, Colorado PODCASTS - AS MY WORLD TURNS - Blogger Page - http://asmyworldturnstv.blogspot.com/ BlogTV Page - http://www.blogtv.com/Shows/20453 AS MY WEIGHT LOSS WORLD TURNS - http://asmyweightlossworldturns.blogspot.com PAT'S REAL DEAL VIDEO BLOG - http://patsrealdeal.livejournal.com/ PAT'S HEALTH MEDICAL WONDERS VIDEOCAST - http://patshealthmedicalwondersvideocast.blogspot.com/ YOUTUBE CHANNEL - http://www.youtube.com/amwowttv/ THE PAT COOK SHOW - http://www.livevideo.com/thepcshow THE PAT COOK SHOW (Video Podcast) - Blogger Page - http://thepctvshow.blogspot.com/ - BlogTV Page - http://www.blogtv.com/Shows/19924 **COMING SOON** - PAT'S CLASSIC TV COMMERCIALS VIDEO PODCAST - http://patsclassictvcommercials-ipod.blogspot.com/ (iPod), http://patsclassictvcommercials-windowsmedia/ (Windows Media), http://patsclassictvcommercials-flash/ (Flash), http://patsclassictvcommercials-divx (DiVx AVI) Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: National Protests of Scientology by Anonymous this Sunday
Irina and I hit the San Francisco protest yesterday. Here's what we came up with: http://www.geekentertainment.tv/2008/02/11/anonymous-vs-scientology/ On Feb 11, 2008 9:00 AM, Patrick Delongchamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was out and about Sunday around town and saw about two dozen people wearing masks scattered around the city throughout the day. Two walking by during brunch, a few on the subway, a few on the streets here and there. It took all day before it this thread clicked in my head and I realized what they had all been doing. On Feb 10, 2008 12:08 AM, Andrew Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a reminder about 11am on Sunday around the world. Would love to see some footage from anyone who can make it out. Ive been reading the forums and here in NYC it looks like its going to be huge, I cant believe how many people are participating. Andrew On Feb 7, 2008 7:42 PM, Andrew Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This Sunday there will be an amazing protest of Scientology by the Anonymous group. If anyone in the US can make it out to capture some footage in your own locale and would be willing to sync up, please email me off-list. Thanks! Map of Protests around the country http://harbl.wetfish.net/cosplay/ Anonymous makes it on to NPR: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=18764756 The anti-Scientology group Anonymous told NBC11 Monday it expected more than 300,000 people to join protests worldwide on Feb. 10th at 11am. The campaign is going amazingly -- swimmingly at the moment. We are in the organizational stages, a woman who would not give her name told NBC11. We are having members of Anonymous from all over the world join the protest at their local church of Scientology at 11 a.m. local time. Other people claiming to be members of Anonymous told NBC11 that the actual number of Scientology protesters worldwide will not reach 300,000. The actual number of people who show up for the rallies could be much less, they said. The group members said out of the 24 time zones, there are 17 that have Churches of Scientology. Of the 24 time zones there are 17 that have a church located in them and we believe our protesting is happening in 15 of those 17, said the group member. We have a map that people can log in to and say what protest they're going to at the current moment. At last count we expect 300,000 at all the protests. Everyone in the world is invited. We're trying to get support from local organizations. Anonymous claims the Church of Scientology forces members to have abortions as well as sign over their bank accounts. We think it's wrong that they have tax exempt status, the member told NBC11. We want to to see if we can get that looked into by the IRS -- who ever we can gain the ear of. Are they really a religious organization or a business? The member of Anonymous said her organization is attempting to change its approach because it first gained attention as a group of hackers and pranksters. The group said it now plans to engage in activities that fight against Scientology, but are not considered illegal by the U.S. government. The member told NBC11 that she is not an actual hacker herself, but rather someone providing other means of support to Anonymous. The member said Anonymous is planning to hold large monthly protests against Scientology at its churches each month until May. She said the group is drawing up plans for more protests after that. The group member said Anonymous would hold another large protest two days after church founder L. Ron Hubbard's birthday on March 15. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] It begins...
You mean like the Internet? Hi Charles! On Jan 18, 2008 2:05 PM, Charles HOPE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Judging from some of the attitudes here, one might be inclined to think that vlogging was invented by the government and promoted by grants. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] My Amends To Robert Scoble
Andrew man, do you really have to lay a long ass email like that on me? Give a vidbro a break, wouldya? It's still the holidays for some people. Damn, now I gotta formulate answers You make a lot of assumptions about us and my role at PodTech, Let me just lay the ground work a bit so you have a better understanding. I get a sense of an almighty you suck tone in your response. I'll try not to let that color my reply to you. Producing GETV was only one part of my job at PodTech. Other parts were shooting editing corporate content for PodTech's paying clients, shooting editing o' plenty of Scoble's show before he got editors and later producing LunchMeet. Irina similarly had other things on her plate outside of GETV. Producing GETV was never to be our full-time job, nor was it to be a daily show in my mind. Please keep this in perspective as you read on. On Dec 26, 2007 5:51 PM, Andrew Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just a side track I guess on what may be a rhetorical question but a question nonetheless: On Dec 26, 2007, at 2:18 PM, Eddie Codel wrote: How many people do you think it takes to put out a daily Rocketboom episode? In context of your show on Podtech, along with the very nice budget that you had, as well as all of the business worries on someone else's watch, I would suggest just two, as you had. I think three is a great production number for a team but your budget would of been able to support more talent, it was up to you to determine the creative side I think. Over time, the success of the show is pretty much in your hands. Its all about the content and what you can do with your time. Of course there are a huge mound of barriers and bureaucracies and things that are truly not fair that get in the way, but I still think, at the end of the day, its what you can produce, content-wise that must build its own support. It seems like this must be the perspective or mind-set that you would need to be the most effective under the situation of deciding to go with a network like Podtech. Chalk it up to false expectations then, I'll take the hit for that. Andrew, I applaud your ability to pull off making a great daily show with such little resources. Our show was something that Irina and I pulled out of collective asses, not something with a grand vision or plan from the beginning. I never saw it as a daily show and we didn't have the time to make it a daily show even we wanted that. Again, our time was split at PodTech. Correct me if Im wrong, but I always saw Podtech as a record label that supports artists, not entrepreneurs or business people. It was meant for the people who dont want to deal with all the business, they just want to do one thing: make great content. If they just can do that one thing well, they are entrusting the record label to do the rest. Its more intertwined than that really, but thats the gist of what I mean to say. The record label of course expects or at least hopes that the artist will make some kind of work that allot of people will want to see. Interesting comparison and maybe apt if we actually did get support. Record labels also help their artists grow. They know what it takes to produce work that a lot of people will want to hear. PodTech was not that record label. With Rocketboom in particular, we do not have the support of a network. So its different, we do all of the business and try to grow everything ourselves. Along with some help from Josh Kinberg and Kenyatta Cheese, I pretty much did the whole thing daily myself for the first 6 months with Amanda Congdon pitching in a couple of hours per show. Eventually we we were both doing it full time. While I had some editing support here and there, after one year, I hired a full time editor. So after one year, we went from two to three. The growth of the audience and the demand for time to grow the business supported the growth of additional people. So let me ask, how did you and Amanda pay your rent that first year? How did you feed yourselves? If you didn't have the support of a network, how did you manage to pay the bills while doing this full time? From an artistic perspective, it's very draining to research, write, direct, edit and publish every day by yourself (keep this point in mind, I'm about to drive it home). Then, we hired Ellie to help assist me with all of the business stuff (she is still with us and has way grown out of that role). After Amanda left, I eventually hired support to help get the whole business together, tight, up to date and clear. Now we are growing as we manage other projects as well. We were and still are in a start-up mentality which is a different kind of place to be for us, compared to an artists who just needs a place to do their art. The thing I figured out over time - and this is the main point I wanted to share - is that it only takes one or two but you have to factor in endurance. Its
Re: [videoblogging] Re: My Amends To Robert Scoble
On Dec 26, 2007 4:31 PM, Kent Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But things started bogging down when they were focused more on developing a new flash player in house rather than selling sponsorships. I agree with this. That's one thing I could never understand. Why did PodTech feel the need to hire an engineering team to reinvent the wheel? Seems like they could have licensed any number of flash players/hosting platforms that were 2 years ahead in development with features already vetted and baked out. I recall pitching a white label blip.tv very early on. Then Castfire appeared, again developed way ahead of PT's roadmap but with all the features, dynamic ad insertion and reporting PT could need. I got the sense PT wanted to be a media company AND a technology company, which I think was a big mistake. -eddie [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Jan 26th 2008 Video Event in Tokyo, Japan
I request a reaction video of Schlomo eating fish balls for the first time. Be sure to pile on the fish sauce! On Dec 18, 2007 1:12 PM, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 18, 2007 11:10 AM, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Its so cool to see a videoblog event happen in Japan. something ive been waiting to see for a long time. Schlomo cruising around Tokyo is video I want to watch. Yes, I imagine it will be like a Gwen Stefani video, but without...well... without Gwen. But just as much dancing. And more food vlog pron to show my Mom. -- Schlomo Rabinowitz http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://hatfactory.net AIM:schlomochat [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] New monthly video event in SF this Friday 12/14
Hello vlogerati, I'm organizing a new monthly video salon series in San Francisco called Video Salon Redux that takes place this Friday the 14th. Yeah I know, sorry for the short notice. Details here: http://upcoming.yahoo.com/event/334862/ The idea behind this is to create a space where video artists, bloggers, editors, animators, machinamists, serialists and anyone else can present their projects. This is partly modeled afer Dorkbot, a similar open event focused on hardware hacking and doing strange things with electricity. The format is simple: 3 curated 15 minute presentations on a particular theme. Following a break there will be an open period where anyone can come and show a video or a work in progress in 5 minutes. The hope is presenters and attendees will be inspired by each other to create and maybe collaborate. This months theme is documenting your passion and many of you already know our presenters: :: Doctor Popular http://www.doctorpopular.com/ :: Oscar Grimm, Tanja Andrews Barb Finnin of Freshtopia.net http://www.freshtopia.net :: Jay Dedman Ryanne Hodson http://ryanishungry.com So if you're in San Francisco this Friday, please come out. If not, we'll be doing it again in January. If you're interested in presenting at future Video Salon, drop me a line. 6:30 :: doors, shmooze, drink (cash bar) 7:30 :: presentations 8:30 :: open video: 5 minutes to show us your thing Dimension 7 Studios 150 Folsom Street San Francisco see you there! -eddie [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] just type YES if u will be at Podcast Expo this weekend
YES [BEERS ON TIM!] On 9/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: YES [BEERS!] Tim Tim Street Creator/Executive Producer French Maid TV The Viral Video of How To's by French Maids http://frenchmaidtv.com Subscribe for FREE at: http://www.frenchmaidtv.com/itunes MY BLOG: http://1timstreet.blogspot.com/ On Sep 25, 2007, at 4:10 PM, Irina wrote: -- http://geekentertainment.tv [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[videoblogging] Has anyone worked with Bret Branon?
Does anyone know Bret Branon of Westpark Foundries? He's reached out to us a couple times over the past year, wanting us (GETV) to sign an exclusive distribution deal for IPTV, VOD and mobile, that he will represent us in those areas and make us loads of cash. This email is indicative of his strategy. He dangles a carrot but when I say ok, let's pursue this 5k Sprint deal, he demands we sign the 1 year exclusive contract first, without any guarantee that the carrot exists. He smells like an Internet used car salesman who's been watching too much Entourage. Anyone else have dealings with him? -eddie Original Message Subject: Irina, it's bret. Re: Fwd: Meet! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date:Thu, July 26, 2007 12:46 am To: Irina [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Irina, I think I can get you at least 5k a month to put your show on Sprint mobile phones if we can provide them 10 minutes of original content each month. Sign a contract with me and let me have an exclusive for one year to pimp you out in the marketplace. Attached is a contract. I KNOW I can get you an iptv deal through ATT, but the money is nothing like mobile right now. Mobile is where we could bank. The breakdown: 1. Yer tha shit. 2. One year exclusive. 3. 70-30 You. 4. IPTV, VOD, and mobile. You guys still do whatever you want with the show I will not get in the way of your existing marketing efforts. If you find a better deal without me or before I find you one, we'll tear up the contract. Just give me a chance to develop those ancillary markets for your program and prove to you that I am worth doing business with. Ethically and financially. Email or call if you have any questions or just want to talk shop. I'm cool like that. Best, b. Bret Branon [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: irina gone
Registering as a Community Mark is an alternative worth a look. http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2006/01/14/the-case-for-community-marks/ -eddie On 7/24/07, Kent Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John, I'm begging you to form a non-profit. Let the awards live there. It will happen with or without you, and it may as well be with you and your trademark. -- Kent Nichols http://askaninja.com http://askaninja.com/ http://hopeisemo.com http://hopeisemo.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Digest Number 4632
i did. here's what happened: http://sxswclick.com/watch/petersons_savings_and_loan/ On 7/16/07, RANDY MANN [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: somebody should call On 7/16/07, Teri Duff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am out of the office and will return July 30th. If you need to reach me sooner, you can phone (510) 910-2340. Sorry for any inconvenience, Teri On Jul 12, 2007, at 11:14 AM, videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.comwrote: [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] What's the most efficient way to gather clips from myriad online video services?
Snapz Pro is what you want. Definitely worth the $70. I use it all the time. It lets you adjust frame rate, capture size, save in multiple file formats, has hotkey quick launch. It is a needed tool in the arsenal of the web video masher upper. If the video can be displayed on your screen, Snapz Pro can capture it. -eddie On 6/19/07, Nick Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm working on a new video-critiquing clip show (a bit like the Daily Reel or the Clip Show, but with huge differences). I'm making two or three episodes a week. In each episode, I need to include six to ten clips from a half-dozen videos. I'm grabbing clips from YouTube, Blip, College Humor, Vimeo, Quicktime embeds, and several other sources. So my needs are: - Less-than-a-day turnaround - Ability to capture any video - Decent framerate/audio I tried iShowU, $20 to buy and the most commonly recommended program for this work, but the program refuses to record at a decent frame rate. (By the way, does anyone know YouTube's default frame rate, or is that variable?) I'll probably buy Snapz Pro, but I wondered if anyone would warn me off lest I waste $70 on another broken program. Surprisingly, former Daily Reel host Felicia Williams tells me her crew used TubeSock. (I've used TubeSock but decided encoding entire videos is too slow and inefficient.) Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Maker Faire Video Set
Indeed. I shot 2.5 hours of footage over 2 days and I'm probably in the minority. It really is hard for any set of videos to really communicate the experience of Maker Faire. Even being there in person, there is too much going on to see it all. I love what Andrew did breaking up different pieces into their own videos. Maybe I'll do the same. For now, here's a video I put together for GETV with a couple longer interviews linked from the post. http://www.geekentertainment.tv/2007/05/23/a-day-at-the-maker-faire/ fun! fun! -eddie On 5/23/07, schlomo rabinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I agree, its a hard event to encapsulate. Sooo much was going on at the fairegrounds. We tried hard to stick with an over-arching theme of alternative energy and reuseability (since that is what we focus on on KnowHow): http://www.weknowhow.tv/2007/05/23/maker-faire/ ...and, of course, a little bit of Bre Pettis who shows you how to make a Make Podcast:) I know there were a bunch of folks out there shooting video for the Internets! I'm looking forward to seeing everyones interpretation of the event. It's like Roshomon, but without the death. Schlomo http://schlomolog.blogspot.com http://weknowhow.tv http://winkshow.com http://hatfactory.net On 5/21/07, filmanimationweb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Drew, Thanx for posting the Maker video's, for those of us living in the sticks it really gives us a look at some very cool inventions. Great imaginations at work!!! Thanks Taylor www.bikinizero.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Covering an event like the Maker Fair, in video form, can be extremely challenging. The style that I have become accustomed to in the past is to shoot as much as possible and then edit it all down into a single video of just a few minutes, with the expectations for some extras of raw video, for the more interested. This is what we are doing for our Rocketboom episode tomorrow on Tuesday. However, setting aside the show itself (and the extras), Im pretty happy with the way this one came together, in terms of audience experience for event documentation: http://rocketboom.com/maker_faire/ Much like a photo set, we set out to capture tiny little clips that, all together, stand as a fun little, self-paced video ride through the fair. I see it as somewhat of an evolution on the Flickr Set experience, in one baby step. My new favorite event had all the visual candy anyone would need to make something like this work. Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Pixelodeon
Wow Jay, the site looks frigging beautiful. Y'all have done an amazing job putting this thing together. Very proud to be a part of it. This is history in the making. Btw, a bunch of us Bay area peeps are planning to caravan on down to LA. I've got a truckload of peeps. Anyone else want to run away and join the circus for the weekend? -eddie On 5/14/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check out the new site for the vlog festival June 9/10. http://pixelodeonfest.com We're really trying to build a solid bridge between the Youtubers, Vloggers, and Hollywood crowd by focusing on content. All the enabling technology is exciting, but at the core its about what we're creating. We also have a DIY theater where we'll be letting anyone show off their work. Technology wont be left out. We have 2 classrooms for anyone wanting to present their stuff and argue over RSS standards. They'll be a lot of educating going on. Email me offlist of you want to help organize this section. Lots to do. We have about 28 curators that have helped us program 16 screenings over 2 days. Videos were chosen not by what was the best; we're tried to find the best mix of videos and visions that have emerged the last 2 years. I'm also really excited because we got Wordpress (Matt Mullenwag in the house) and Blogger to be two of the sponsors. You can finally meet he people that run these platforms and tell them what you want! Of course the Blip and Spinxpress guys will be representing. Gena has done a great job on the logistics: http://pixelodeon.pbwiki.com/Hotels%20and%20Transportation Just shout if you need help figuring out LA. Be very cool to see any of you in person. Jay -- Here I am http://jaydedman.com Check out the latest project: http://pixelodeonfest.com/ Webvideo festival this June Yahoo! Groups Links [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [videoblogging] Re: SXSW Roll Call
9th-16th for me. moderating a panel on the 12th @ 5pm titled 'What does the future hold for video on the Internet?' with a few fellow videobloggers. -eddie On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:35:21AM -0800, Halcyon wrote: late 9th - 13th !! Woo-hoo! Doing a live hugnation on sunday 12:30 and panel sat eve. about what mainstream can learn from porn http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Issue/story?oid=oid%3A451626 -halcyon pinkbroadcasting.com On 3/6/07, bestdamntechshow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll be there. 8th-14th _drew olanoff www.pluggd.com www.bestdamntech.com www.scriggity.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, JV [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Who is there when? I'll start - Jim V - 9-13th [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] MyHeavy.com Tinfoil Version...
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 11:05:40AM -0500, Ron Watson wrote: Sure our shit is better, but so was Beta. Raising some shit is good, but a protest requires one of two things: media coverage to pressure the powerful or fear of the rabble storming the castle. This is the main reason that the pro-peace protests in the run up to the US Invasion of Iraq did nothing; there was no media coverage, and contrary to the Johnson-Nixon era, there was no fear of the rabble storming the castle. Use your blog as your rabble rousing platform. Media are noticing. Investors read the media. http://newteevee.com/2007/01/04/myheavy-accused-of-splogging/ -eddie
Re: [videoblogging] Re: www.jeroenwijering.com
Yeah, it's here. http://www.jeroenwijering.com/?item=Flash_Video_Player If you play and reload often enough you might see your videos. He's using blip as an example feed. On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 08:42:52PM -0500, Mike Hudack wrote: It's not from our use of the flash player. He has some new Flash player versions that can subscribe to RSS feeds, and he likes to demo them. -Original Message- From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sull Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 7:51 PM To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: www.jeroenwijering.com i was thinking maybe it had something to do with blip too. is this happening on specific videos or all videos? On 1/3/07, Michael Schaap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com, missbhavens1969 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: me too...it's weird. B. us too! very strange indeed. jeroen is the creator of the flash player Blip uses but somehow i can't imagine how 'it' works... -- Sull http://vlogdir.com (a project) http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog) http://interdigitate.com (otherly) [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Re: MyHeavy.com Disregarding Vlogger CC Licenses
We're not talking about a technical protocol for delivery of video content. We already have that. Jay is talking about a business protocal for companys/organizations to REPUBLISH that content. On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 09:01:00PM -0800, Lucas Gonze wrote: On 1/3/07, Jay dedman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is, incidentally, a protocol for Web-based aggregation of video content. Here are two other protocols for web-based aggregation of video content: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2396.txt http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2616.txt Here is an explanation of that protocol at a hight level: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/deeplinking.html Here is a quote from that explanation: This issue is important because attempts to limit deep linking are in fact risky for two reasons: 1. The policy is at risk of failure. The Web is so large that any policy enforcement requires considerable automated support from software to be practical. Since a deep link looks like any other link to Web software, such automated support is not practical. Which is why there are computer readable versions of Creative Commons licenses. Anyone who builds a complex application that can read, republish, watermark and slap ads around video content can also figure out a way to respect copyrights of that content. 2. The Web is at the risk of damage. The hypertext architecture of the Web has brought substantial benefits to the world at large. The onset of legislation and litigation based on confusion between identification and access has the potential to impair the future development of the Web.A Look, I'm no fan of government regulation of the Internet and this is not a technical problem that needs regulating. No one is saying that deep linking in of itself is a problem. The confusion lies in that a company can access YOUR content and identify lots of revenue by republishing it with advertising. -eddie
Re: [videoblogging] macworld
free exhibit passes if you use the magic promo code: digg http://digg.com/tech_deals/Free_MacWorld_Expo_Passes_For_All_Digg_Users On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 06:07:22PM -0600, Michael Verdi wrote: I'll be there. Ryanne and I are doing a short thing about our book on Tuesday. Also, Outhink is having a little get together around the corner at our studio on Thursday the 11th at 4pm - everyone welcome. -Verdi On 1/2/07, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: any vloggers planning to come out to san francisco next week for macworld? --- Markus Sandy http://feeds.feedburner.com/havemoneywillvlog http://feeds.feedburner.com/apperceptions http://feeds.feedburner.com/digitaldojo http://feeds.feedburner.com/spinflow -- http://michaelverdi.com http://spinxpress.com http://freevlog.org Author of Secrets Of Videoblogging - http://tinyurl.com/me4vs [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [videoblogging] Creative Commons turns 4 on Friday: Parties in NYC, SF and Beyond!
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 11:03:13AM -0800, ryan junell wrote: http://junell.net/thevlogger/ (5 episodes! I'd love to know what you think!) friggin hilarious. you in that moumou has me scarred for life! this seriously is brilliant, everyone should check it out. I should admit I'm partial to the organization, I've made three animations and a font for the organization and designed the logo over the past four+ years. watch get creative, reticulum rex and the most recent one wanna work together here: http://creativecommons.org/support/videos ryan, your talents are exceptional. i just showed the latest CC video to a bunch of students in austria for a videoblogging workshop. i think their eyes glazed over, but they understood. -eddie
[videoblogging] Alive in Baghdad presents at the HatFactory in SF
Since the Alive in Baghdad guys are in town for the Vloggies, a few of us decided it would be great to have them do a presentation on what they are all about. If you're in town Sunday night after the Vloggies, join us at the Hat Factory for a special presentation. --eddie http://upcoming.org/event/123503 When Sunday, November 5, 2006 7:00 PM - 9:00 PM Where The Hat Factory 801 Minnesota St. #08 San Francisco, California 94107 Description Brian Conley, Steve Wyshywaniuk and Steve Lieberman of the Alive in Baghdad videoblog are in town for the Vloggies. Tonight they'll present their project which is devoted to empowering Iraqi citizen journalists to share their stories with the world in personal, candid and non-bureaucratic ways. They'll give the background on how this project came to be, how Iraqis are empowered to contribute and show several videos from the project. They'll unveil their new expanded Alive in... project. QA will follow. We'll have some light snacks and drinks. Bring stuff to share if you're feeling inclined. --- Alive in Baghdad was formed to counter the sound-bite driven, ‘Live From’ news model. Through the work of a team of Americans and Iraqi correspondents on the ground, Alive in Baghdad shows the occupation through the voices of Iraqis. Alive in Baghdad brings testimonies from individual Iraqis, footage of daily life in Iraq, and short news segments from Iraq to you. In 2005 Brian Conley traveled to the Middle East for two months and spent three weeks in Baghdad. After a year of preparation for the trip, learning Arabic, and studying the history and culture of Iraq, he went to Baghdad to meet Iraqis. Initially Alive in Baghdad chronicled the voices of Iraqis, in order to provide a more intimate picture of Iraqi life. After a second trip to the Middle East this summer, Alive in Baghdad provided video cameras, microphones, tapestock, and training to Iraqis living in Baghdad. Now these Iraqis are producing a weekly videoblog from Baghdad, on topics ranging from protecting their families from death squads, to what it is like to be an Iraqi Police officer. These Iraqis are Omar Abdullah and Isam Rasheed working full-time, Qasem Al-Dulaimi producing some video and a regular text blog, as well as a number of other Iraqis collaborating on a currently ad-hoc basis. Steve Wyshywaniuk is a recent graduate from Philadelphia's Temple University with a bachelors degree in Film and Video Arts. He got involved with the Alive in Baghdad project last January when he met Brian Conley at the yearly National Conference for Organized Resistance, he has since helped out with editing videos and organizing the archive. Stephen Lieberman went to Simon's Rock College with Brian, graduated in 2003 and started an ecommerce business. He is currently studying civil liberties, international law and US military policy at the University of Connecticut. He also runs a small recording studio part-time in Hartford and is working on his pilot's license. He is the Chief Operating Officer for Small World News under Mr. Conley. Homepage http://aliveinbaghdad.org Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Remix Revver Videos?
Yes, they use CC NoDerivs so to keep the ad at the end intact. From their blog: By default, when you upload a video to Revver, your video is protected by the Creative Commons license Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5. This means that people are free to share your video (this is how you make money, after all) but that they must credit you as the creator and they cannot change the video without your permission. Unfortunately, the terms of service for some sites that allow user uploads give them the right to edit your work and repurpose it however they please. It???s also worth noting that when you upload a Revverized video to many of these sites, the ad is stripped out. Removing that ad may actually be violating the non-derivative license. http://blog.revver.com/?p=67 -eddie On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 03:42:47PM -0400, Steve Garfield wrote: I clicked on the CC licesnse they have chosen to use and it is this one: by Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor. nd No Derivative Works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. So you can't remix. I guess that answers that. On Aug 8, 2006, at 3:15 PM, Steve Garfield wrote: the Revver Q and A says: 1. Why is Creative Commons the default license on Revver? The Creative Commons share-alike license simply says that you are allowing people to share your work. This is vital to the Revver system because the more people watch your video, the more money you earn. To learn more about Creative Commons take a look at their website. On Aug 8, 2006, at 3:05 PM, Chuck Leggett wrote: I'm no expert, but it appears when you upload the file to Revver you are aggreeing to change the licensing from CC-Share Alike to All Rights Reserved. --Steve -- http://SteveGarfield.com - Fighting the good fight http://Rocketboom.com - Correspondent http://hipcast.com (audioblog.com) - Community Manager Yahoo! Groups Links --Steve -- http://SteveGarfield.com - Fighting the good fight http://Rocketboom.com - Correspondent http://hipcast.com (audioblog.com) - Community Manager Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Legal Question, I think..........
Stephanie, I don't know, I forwarded him the same email you read. Yes, EFF isn't generally down with the MPAA's tactics but that doesn't mean Jason is going to give incorrect or unethical advice. He just said 'generally' which is a vague enough answer without knowing the specific details of the case, as he says. It seems like the safe thing to do is just blur the MPAA goon's face. Also I believe the private vs public issue involves more than whether an event is privately run or on private property. If I go to Macworld and there are no signs telling me I can't take photos and no security approach me and tell me photos are not allowed, then I don't think Macworld organizers could demand I remove photos from my website a week later. I don't know if the Motor City situation is similar at all. The point I'm making is simply that even in a private space there is some responsibility on the private owners to proactively try and prevent me from using my camera. -eddie Stephanie Bryant wrote: Eddie, does Jason's answer change much when given the information that a comic con is NOT a public place? I'm not sure (and Motor City Comic Con's website is offline), but most media-centric cons are private-- you buy memberships to them, and have to wear a badge to get into panels, sessions, and the dealers room (where these bootlegs were being sold). Also, Heath: remember that Jason is at the EFF, an organization diametrically opposed to the MPAA philosophically as well as tactically. Not saying it's bad advice. Just saying it's not objective advice-- very little in law is, though. On 5/22/06, Eddie Codel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just ran this by my lawyer pal Jason Schultz @ the EFF and he had this to say on the matter. Let me know if you want to talk to him directly. --- Interesting. Generally, I'd say he's fine to post it. He'd probably be even safer if he blurs out the face of the guy who didn't want to be on camera. But let him know if he wants to talk to me directly, I can give him some real advice when I know more information. But yeah, he should definitely find a way to put this up. On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 02:47:01PM -0700, Eddie Codel wrote: From what I understand, and I'm no lawyer, if the action took place in public then it's fair game and you are protected by the First Amendment. Definitely newsworthy, BoingBoing worthy for sure. I'd love to see what you shot. -eddie On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:57:47AM -, Heath wrote: I had a question that I was hoping ya'll could help me with. I just got back from the Motor City Con (it is a comic, toy, TV, Movie, convention) and while I was there I witnessed a raid by the MPAA on some dealers who were selling bootleg video's and video's that are not yet availible (like some TV shows, or shows from overseas that have not yet been released here), I got some of this on camera. However, one of the MPAA guys saw me and said he did not want to be on camera. He basicly, tried to intimate me. Anyway, what is my legal standing? It was, to my knowledge a public place, and I was documenting the MPAA and the local police shut down these vendors. Can I show the footage even though the MPAA guy asked not to be on camera. If I blur him out am I fine? Like I said I was just hoping someone here may know something. Someone said you have to have a release, but I don't nessacary think that is true because of all those hidden camera things on the news.anyway any help would be apprciated. Heath - Batman Geek http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Legal Question, I think..........
>From what I understand, and I'm no lawyer, if the action took place in public then it's fair game and you are protected by the First Amendment. Definitely newsworthy, BoingBoing worthy for sure. I'd love to see what you shot. -eddie On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:57:47AM -, Heath wrote: I had a question that I was hoping ya'll could help me with. I just got back from the Motor City Con (it is a comic, toy, TV, Movie, convention) and while I was there I witnessed a raid by the MPAA on some dealers who were selling bootleg video's and video's that are not yet availible (like some TV shows, or shows from overseas that have not yet been released here), I got some of this on camera. However, one of the MPAA guys saw me and said he did not want to be on camera. He basicly, tried to intimate me. Anyway, what is my legal standing? It was, to my knowledge a public place, and I was documenting the MPAA and the local police shut down these vendors. Can I show the footage even though the MPAA guy asked not to be on camera. If I blur him out am I fine? Like I said I was just hoping someone here may know something. Someone said you have to have a release, but I don't nessacary think that is true because of all those hidden camera things on the news.anyway any help would be apprciated. Heath - Batman Geek http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com Yahoo! Groups Links SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Legal Question, I think..........
I just ran this by my lawyer pal Jason Schultz @ the EFF and he had this to say on the matter. Let me know if you want to talk to him directly. --- Interesting. Generally, I'd say he's fine to post it. He'd probably be even safer if he blurs out the face of the guy who didn't want to be on camera. But let him know if he wants to talk to me directly, I can give him some real advice when I know more information. But yeah, he should definitely find a way to put this up. On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 02:47:01PM -0700, Eddie Codel wrote: From what I understand, and I'm no lawyer, if the action took place in public then it's fair game and you are protected by the First Amendment. Definitely newsworthy, BoingBoing worthy for sure. I'd love to see what you shot. -eddie On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:57:47AM -, Heath wrote: I had a question that I was hoping ya'll could help me with. I just got back from the Motor City Con (it is a comic, toy, TV, Movie, convention) and while I was there I witnessed a raid by the MPAA on some dealers who were selling bootleg video's and video's that are not yet availible (like some TV shows, or shows from overseas that have not yet been released here), I got some of this on camera. However, one of the MPAA guys saw me and said he did not want to be on camera. He basicly, tried to intimate me. Anyway, what is my legal standing? It was, to my knowledge a public place, and I was documenting the MPAA and the local police shut down these vendors. Can I show the footage even though the MPAA guy asked not to be on camera. If I blur him out am I fine? Like I said I was just hoping someone here may know something. Someone said you have to have a release, but I don't nessacary think that is true because of all those hidden camera things on the news.anyway any help would be apprciated. Heath - Batman Geek http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links SPONSORED LINKS Fireant Individual Typepad Use Explains YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Vloggercon 2006 Volunteers Meetup
The main room is rated at 334 capacity. Total venue capacity is 600. There are 3 seperate rooms for stuff to happen in. You can get an idea of the space by checking out the Webzine2005 Flickr pool. http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/webzine2005/ -eddie On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 11:38:24PM -, Enric wrote: The main hall, from my attendance there at Webzine, I think can seat about 200-300 people. I'm sure I'll be corrected with a more accurate number by those organizing. -- Enric --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, P. Dilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it would just be costly to fly in and out, pay for a hotel and stuff, then find out like 20 people are there. The reason I brought it up was the building does not look all that big. On 4/12/06, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm just a volunteer, not involved in the organizing. Jay or someone else from Node101 may have an estimate on this. -- Enric --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, P. Dilly podcastpickle@ wrote: I am interested in knowing what the projected amount of people that will attened this event. We are thinking of going, is it around 1000 people expected, less, or more On 4/12/06, Enric enric@ wrote: If you're in the area, want to volunteer and available on 4/15 3:30 pm, come to the Vloggercon 2006 Volunteers Meetup. It's at Maxfield's House of Caffiene, 398 Dolores St., San Francisco Bay Area, California 94110. Sign up at upcoming.org: http://upcoming.org/event/70393/ -- Enric -==- http://www.cirne.com -- YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS - Visit your group videoblogginghttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging on the web. - To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/?subject=Unsubscribe - Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/. -- -- Gary leland Vote for PodcastPickle.com in the Webby Awards. Go to http://peoplesvoice.webbyawards.com/register.mhtml and register to vote SPONSORED LINKS Fireanthttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Fireantw1=Fireantw2=Individualw3=Usec=3s=38.sig=hfs_5_0lBhh4r_ghxepr0w Individualhttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Individualw1=Fireantw2=Individualw3=Usec=3s=38.sig=GUaJZU-r1JDlLAUOsMLl8g Usehttp://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Usew1=Fireantw2=Individualw3=Usec=3s=38.sig=LXDZ5r7JrGSXuirwFdbEXw -- YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS - Visit your group videoblogginghttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging on the web. - To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED] - Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/. -- -- Gary leland Vote for PodcastPickle.com in the Webby Awards. Go to http://peoplesvoice.webbyawards.com/register.mhtml and register to vote Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] ABC Shows Online
sure, but that still requires you to use itunes. they could simply offer a non-ad streamed version alongside the ad supported version. let the consumer decide if it's worth a buck or two to skip the ads. it would be an interesting experiment at least. On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 04:18:13PM -0400, Josh Leo wrote: they already do offer that on itunes, I think making freedownloads of shows with commercials makes sense, but the concept that people would skip over commercials also makes sense...so i guess this is the way they ensure most viewers see the ads On 4/11/06, Eddie Codel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If ABC offered the same thing without commercials for a small fee that would be a nice alternative. Let the consumer choose if they want the ads or not. -- Josh Leo www.JoshLeo.com Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Veoh ** We are hearing you loud and clear
that's weird. i'm waiting to see how this all shakes out before i decide if i want my feeds removed. i think i'm happy for it to be there as long as there is proper attribution and link backs. -eddie On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 10:51:23AM -0700, Enric wrote: !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN html head meta content=text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type title/title /head body bgcolor=#ff text=#00 tt This is almost funny.nbsp; You've assigned jibber jabber: the eddie underworld to my account.nbsp; This is Eddie Codel's feed, a class=moz-txt-link-freetext href=http://eddie.com/;http://eddie.com//a amp;nbsp; a class=moz-txt-link-freetext href=http://blip.tv/users/view/ekai;http://blip.tv/users/view/ekai/a , not mine.nbsp; Please remove this immediately from my account and you should also remove pulling his feed into veoh.nbsp; The best thing to do is just remove all feeds you have spidered without permission from blip.tv and other sources. br br nbsp; -- Enricbr nbsp; -===-br nbsp; a class=moz-txt-link-freetext href=http://www.cirne.com;http://www.cirne.com/abr br tedunning wrote: blockquote cite=[EMAIL PROTECTED] type=cite pre wrap=Enric, I just short-circuited the claiming process and assigned this vlog to you along with all videos in it. (and in the process finally twigged to the fact that cirne is enric backwards... I guess I am focussing elsewhere just now) Let me know if you want to change anything on that vlog. You can reach me directly at 858 414 0013. --- In a class=moz-txt-link-abbreviated href=mailto:videoblogging@yahoogroups.com;videoblogging@yahoogroups.com/a, Enric a class=moz-txt-link-rfc2396E href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;/a wrote: /pre blockquote type=cite pre wrap=I sent an email on my videos for Cirne and got the series ID to claim it. I replied that my other vlog, Tech Alley ( a class=moz-txt-link-freetext href=http://techalley.cirne.com/;http://techalley.cirne.com//a ) , is also showing up on veoh and how to get the series id to claim it. A samples is this: /pre /blockquote pre wrap=!a class=moz-txt-link-freetext href=http://www.veoh.com/videoDetails.html?v=e13718feature=1numResults=20likeVideo=e13854;http://www.veoh.com/videoDetails.html?v=e13718amp;feature=1amp;numResults=20amp;likeVideo=e13854/a /pre blockquote type=cite pre wrap=ttp://tinyurl.com/rqom9 If I can't claim my vlogs entries, please remove them. -- Enric /pre /blockquote pre wrap=! /pre /blockquote br /tt !-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| -- brbr div style=width:500px; text-align:right; margin-bottom:1px; color:#909090; ttSPONSORED LINKS/tt /div table bgcolor=#e0ecee cellspacing=13 cellpadding=0 width=500px tr valign=top td style=width:25%; tta href=http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Fireantw1=Fireantw2=Individualw3=Usec=3s=38.sig=hfs_5_0lBhh4r_ghxepr0w;Fireant/a/tt /td td style=width:25%; tta href=http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Individualw1=Fireantw2=Individualw3=Usec=3s=38.sig=GUaJZU-r1JDlLAUOsMLl8g;Individual/a/tt /td td style=width:25%; tta href=http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=msk=Usew1=Fireantw2=Individualw3=Usec=3s=38.sig=LXDZ5r7JrGSXuirwFdbEXw;Use/a/tt /td /tr /tr /table !-- |**|end egp html banner|**| -- !-- |**|begin egp html banner|**| -- br div style=text-align:center; color:#909090; width:500px; hr style=border-bottom:1px; width:500px; text-align:left; ttYAHOO! GROUPS LINKS/tt /div br ul ttli type=squarenbsp;Visit your group a href=http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging;videoblogging/a on the web.brnbsp;/tt ttli type=squarenbsp;To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:brnbsp;a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED][EMAIL PROTECTED]/abrnbsp;/tt ttli type=squarenbsp;Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the a href=http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/;Yahoo! Terms of Service/a./tt /ul br div style=text-align:center; color:#909090; width:500px; hr style=border-bottom:1px; width:500px; text-align:left; /div /br !-- |**|end egp html banner|**| -- /body /html Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: massive infringement (was: Veoh Transcoding Feeds...)
David. Don't you think you're overreacting just a bit here? From what I can tell, Veoh has been responsive in removing content fairly quickly. The fact that they are here, listening and participating in the community should count for something. Give 'em a chance already. On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 12:00:08AM -, David Howell wrote: Had I not been so vocal on this list about slamming your company with a lawsuit for copyright infringement, you people probably wouldnt have done a thing to recify the situation. Like I said, I am glad that I took screenshots early today as proof that you had indeed stolen my videos and violated my copyright. Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: massive infringement (was: Veoh Transcoding Feeds...)
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 12:18:58AM -, David Howell wrote: You have got to be kidding me. Fine. From what you are saying, I can go over to your house and take whatever I feel like I want to take that is yours and it's ok with you as long as I say golly gee whiz...I am sorry. You know, that analogy just doesn't fly. What we're talking about here is digital content that can be replicated infinitely. You still have the original copies, you still retain rights to them. You have suffered no monetary loss as a result. Give them a break when they have ALREADY stolen from me!?!? Next to Dmitry's posts, that's got to be one of the most assinine things I have read here all day. Well, then I must be an ass in 9. How about taking a walk around the neighborhood and looking at the beautiful sunset? Relax, take a deep breath. Your posts are fueled by your anger, which is totally understandable but it leads to overreaction and irrational thinking. I'm just saying as one human to another. What would you want Veoh to do to make things right for YOU? Is it possible? -eddie Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Who owns culture?
Lessig does give an awesome presentation. He's been shopping that one around for awhile now. Quite worth seeing if you never have. GETV interviewed Lessig recently: http://www.geekentertainment.tv/2006/03/28/lawrence-lessig-just-a-a-lawyer/ It isn't about letting people do 'whatever they want' with a creative work. It's about broadening the copyright spectrum from the 'all rights reserved' model. This doesn't mean that you're giving up the ability to profit from your work. Quite the opposite actually, as more people become aware of work that they may want to license commercially. -eddie On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 09:22:45PM -, David Dundas wrote: Maybe that's his general argument, but in this talk, which is a challenge to incite discussion he does question the premise of copyright. Did you get the opportunity to watch it? --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think your misrepresenting Lessig slightly. He doesn't really argue against copyright, he argues against the way they are currently written. There's a difference. Bill Streeter LO-FI SAINT LOUIS www.lofistl.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, David Dundas david@ wrote: Hi Group, I don't typically post videos from YouAreTV in forums, but I think this one is very pertinent. Lawrence Lessig did an introductory talk at the New York Public Library about copyright law and technology on April 7, 2005. http://www.youare.tv/watch.php?id=534 http://www.youare.tv/watch.php?id=534 He says that copyright laws stifle creativity, and democracy. It's an idea that begs the question. Would you stop creating what you create if someone could just take it and do whatever they wanted with it? The content creators I talk to are seeking exposure today, so they are willing to place their content wherever they can. As some of them grow in popularity, I am sure that we'll see them become more protective over their work. It's a great presentation. Lessig is a very smart guy. Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Other People's Videos
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 12:24:58PM -0500, Melanie Morgan wrote: I'd be interested in what Geek Entertainment TV thinks of the method? you used to post one of their interviews. http://www.newmediacollective.org/2006/03/ sxsw2006_blogging_while_black.html Looks like you have a direct link to their movie with a link back to? their site for credit. In this case, and in the SXSW video, I linked back to their sites. Although I use pop-ups to showcase videos on my other site (http://nyc-tv.com), on The New Media Collective I've elected to use embedded video because 1) it integrates better with the design, and 2) the playing in place feature is just cool. Since GETV does use a CC license, and host their videos on blip.tv, there shouldn't be a problem since I did give them credit and linked back to the original post. I would be interested in their input though. As far as SXSW goes, that's another issue. ;-) Yes, we're fine with this. I would just ask that you make it a bit more clear that you're reposting. Maybe change the Posted on Geek Entertainment TV.. to Originally posted on.. or Reposted from. Also, use our permalink to the piece, rather than a general link to our site. I like that you're embedding the vid and linking directly to our source. We still get the traffic stats and it looks good on your site. Yay Internet! -eddie Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] vPIP 0.12 Beta is out
We're (GETV) using the new version now. Looks like it works as advertised. Thanks a ton for this Enric! -eddie On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 03:16:30AM -, Enric wrote: vPIP (videos Playing In Place) allows the embedding of videos only when a link, usually image representing the video, is clicked. This allows a vlog page to load quickly. Then when the link is clicked, the video replaces the link and appears next to the blog text. vPIP supports Quicktime, Windows Media and Flash movies.Those who've been on this list, I'm sure have heard me mentioned vPIP several times. The current version has been tested on Firefox, Internet Explorer 6, Opera and Safari. It works well on all these except on Safari the revert feature does not work well, so it's been disabled. The revert option makes a prior video that was active revert back to it's link information when the next video is selected. The blogging systems that vPIP has been tested on are Blogger.com and Wordpress. It should also work on any other blogging system like Typepad and website by referencing it's javascript file. The installation and usage information is at: http://www.utilities.cinegage.com/videos-playing-in-place/ In the usage section is an image link to the Generate vPIP flash utility that lets you specify the video file, image file and other parameters. Then it generates the code to copy and paste into your blog or web site. Currently I know that Geek Entertainment TV, http://www.geekentertainment.tv/, Lo-Fi St. Louis, http://lofistl.com/, Tech Alley, http://techalley.cirne.com/ and Cirne, http://www.cirne.com/vlog/, are using vPIP. Have a look at those sites to see it in operation. As of this writing, Geek Entertainment TV and Lo-Fi St. Louis are using the prior version of vPIP that require the page to completely load for it to go into effect. My sites, Tech Alley and Cirne, are using the new version that operates immediately. Let me know if there's any questions, recommendations for improvements or problems. Thanks, Enric -===- http://www.cirne.com Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] SXSWi interviews (eric rice, eddie codel, others)
Great video Halcyon. Everyone needs an editor. ;) -eddie On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 10:00:11AM -0800, Halcyon Lujah wrote: Grrr. I'm sorry. Link fixed. (I learned a lesson about citizen media when eddie pointed out 3 typos yesterday. I guess I named it wrong when I re-exported it. Thanks!) On 3/17/06, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 404 not found Halcyon Lujah wrote: Sadly...I botched Verdi's audio, so I had to edit that out. Basically got a number of people to comment on the power that vlogging/new tech is giving the people. Thought several people here would enjoy: http://pinkgasm.citizensex.com/spreadthepink/video/sxsw_5min.wmv http://pinkgasm.citizensex.com/spreadthepink/video/sxsw06_5min.wmv Eddie Codel (GeekEntertainment.tv), Craig Newark (craigslist.org), Jason Carlin (ifilm.com), Jon Lebkowsky, Eric Rice (ericrice.com), Nancy White, Matt Mullenweg (wordpress), Danah Boyd, Srini Kumar (unamerican.com), Peter Merholz (adaptive path), more -Halcyon www.SpreadingThePink.com Yahoo! Groups Links -- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.org http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com http://node101.org http://spinflow.org http://wearethemedia.com http://xpressionvlog.blogspot.com aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo! Groups Links -- www.SpreadingThePink.com Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] SXSW
i'm coming. be sure to check upcoming.org. there's tons of sxsw related events, official and unofficial, listed. http://upcoming.org/tag/sxsw2006/ -eddie On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 01:08:39AM -0800, JD Lasica wrote: Michael created a SXSW page for videobloggers on node101: http://node101.org/community/index.php/SXSW06 You get an error when you save the page but it will work. Who else in the vlogosphere is coming? Who knows Austin? Where are the hot dining/drinking spots? jd lasica On 3/6/06, Michael Verdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I set this up: http://node101.org/community/index.php/SXSW06 You get an error when you save the page but it will work. -Michael On 3/6/06, Irina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: btw, http://upcoming.org/event/61589/ On 3/5/06, JD Lasica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Before we get to Austin, wouldn't it be a good idea if we create a page where we can put our contact info, availability and an easily accessible page to see where we're going to get together? I'd sure rather do that than scrolling thru hundreds of emails I get each day to identify an email from a fellow SXSWer. So: Can we create a page, on node101 or a wiki or Ourmedia or on someone's personal site, where we can post: Name Dates in Austin Contact info Availability Venue ideas I'll start: JD Lasica Sun March 13 to Thursday March 17 Cell: 858-353-1865; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Available: Mon, Tue, Wed dinner/ cocktails Venue: I'll defer to Michael and others. jd On 3/5/06, Irina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hey, i think we should get together in austin, that sounds like a good idea. On 3/3/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all sorry I've been quiet but I'm in Vegas right now finishing up a shoot and heading back home this evening. I'm catching up on these emails, but I'm in agreement with all in this thread. Thanks for keeping it moving!! Maybe we should get together in sxsw for a little face-to-face? I'll be there for the whole time. schlomo I can do a PDF this weekend. I was planning on doing two versions, one for the $2,500-$5,000 levels and one for $500-$1,000. I don't really want the Intels and Proctor Gambles to worry about the lower end of the tier. Those teetering between $1,000 and $2,500 could get both flyers (one page each). jd On 3/1/06, Ted Tagami [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'I'll review the list again for components. We will need a PDF version of this too perhaps? Got word back from Creative today. Looks like we will be talking in the next week or so. They are interested in pushing the zen players and video cams.. On 3/1/06, JD Lasica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all. Does the lack of silence on the sponsorship page on the wiki mean that everyone agrees with the components of each tier now? http://www.vloggercon.com/private/index.php?title=Sponsorship_tiers If so, then the only thing we need to finalize are the names of each tier. I agree with Ted on the final descriptions: Go big for $500 and be a Megabyte Sponsor For $1,000 you can be a massive Gigabyte Sponsor At $2,500 you can be an enormous Terabyte Sponsor and for only $5,000 you can be our unspeakably huge Petabyte Sponsor And when we need shorthand (like in the category headings on the website, of course), we shorten them to: Megabyte Gigabyte Terabyte Petabyte Thoughts? Anything else to work out at this point, or can we begin haranguing potential sponsors? :~) jd -- Ted Tagami Principal, Universus Networks U N I V E R S U S . N E T -- Me: http://michaelverdi.com RD: http://evilvlog.com Learn to videoblog: http://freevlog.org Learn to videoblog in person: http://node101.org Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] audience and RSS
On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 01:57:21PM -0500, Josh Leo wrote: Let's take GETV for example. They started in November of 2005. Their vlog consists of interviews with the big name people of the blogosphere that they meet at conferences or in San Francisco. Somehow their subscription numbers have shot up very quick. This is most likely because the people who are most interested in that information are also the people who are using RSS aggregators the most. It is somewhat simple reflexive system, if you talk about bloggers, then bloggers will talk about you and subscribe to your blog. Most are not big name, but yes, we do have easy access to some well known geeks in SF. You have discovered our little secret, cover people with blogs and they cover you. I'm sure that most of our viewers are geeks or geekily inclined and that probably does translate to RSS subscriptions. We do get another 1000 or so views directly from the website within a few days of a new vid posting, though our blip stats are totally skewed because of the MSBITS problem. Rocketboom seems to dwell in this realm, but at times drifts out into the greater world of the internet, I am sure that their forays into the quirky snags them a different audience that views content differently (not using RSS) Agreed, but Rocketboom also has a clean inviting interface to view episodes in a browser. Even though I consume most vlogs via RSS, I always go to Rocketboom's site to see them. Maybe it's the easy access to comments which for me is a big part of the experience. I believe that if someone made a videoblog about hiking, their content would most likely not be viewed via RSS but my singular page views RSS is still unknown to the rest of the world, most people I know don't even know what an aggreagator is. Many of my friends who have blogs on Xanga or Blogger don't even know what a feed is or that they even have one... I think this fast changing. People don't have to know the terms 'aggregator' or 'RSS feed' to know that itunes is a way to listen and watch audio and video content. I guess this just goes to show that subscribers is not popularity of content, but popularity of content within a select group of people who use RSS, therefore the topics that get the most subscribers are the ones that are geared more towards the blog/tech/gadget side of the spectrum... Possibly, but look at the top itunes podcasts. Some of the video podcasts that bubble up to the top are: Strong Bad Email, Tiki Bar TV, Happy Tree Friends, Vintage ToonCast. Screw subscription numbers, just make content!!! Totally! -eddie Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Server stats question
Ah, that explains why my GETV stats are blown out of the water. I get about 1000 MS BITS requests for every site. Also, browser type 'WXHttp' reports a high number as well, something like 200 for every site. Seems like this would be an easy fix on the blip.tv backend to account for these patterns, but I often don't know what I'm talking about. -eddie On Fri, Feb 17, 2006 at 12:12:30PM -0500, Andr? Sala wrote: Andr? here, from TVTonic, the video aggregator featured in Windows Media Center's Online Spotlight. I have contacted many of you about having listed your feeds in our directory. The TVTonic client uses Microsoft BITS (Background Intelligent Transfer Service) to download video content. Videobloggers seeing traces of BITS in their stats could possibly be seeing TVTonic users pulling their videos, however they could also be coming from other RSS clients, such as the RSS reader built in to IE7 which uses BITS. See http://blogs.msdn.com/rssteam/archive/2006/02/02/522642.aspx BITS is the technology that Microsoft uses to deliver Windows Automatic Updates. As Markus said, it is a component designed to control and throttle background downloads as not to make any large resource hit on a user's computer. But the problem, it seems, with BITS is that it makes a substantial number of webserver requests. If you look at your server log you might think that BITS is hammering your bandwidth because of the high number of requests. This is because it is making requests to the server for small chunks of a file rather than one request for the whole file itself. Once it has collected all of the bits of a file, it marks it as being finished and makes the file available to the user. We have actually started to see several servers block requests from the BITS useragent. Revision3's servers (Diggnation Systm), as well as Channel Frederator, to name a few. Recently we've started to see some strange messages get returned from libsyn. FYI ? we are contacting the blip developers to see if there is a way we can work together to ensure their users are receiving less confusing stats. I'll keep everyone posted. I hope that clarifies this BITS issue for many of you. Please feel free to contact me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have more questions. Sincerely, Andr? Sala TVTonic Team Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Are You Going to SXSW?
i'll be there for interactive and maybe part of music. irina too and we'll be cranking out a few GETV episodes while we're there. -eddie On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 12:00:36PM -, James A. Donnelly wrote: Besides Verdi and Andrew... anyone else going to SXSW, TX in March? jadonnelly madpod.com dummycast.com petsonboard.com Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Podsafe Music
http://ccmixter.org is a good source for remixed stuff from the Creative Commons peeps. -eddie On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 01:26:56AM -, LeanBackVids.com wrote: Other than these, where else is a good place to get podsafe music? http://Magnatune.com http://Music.Podshow.com http://Opsound.org http://MusicPodcasting.org http://MusicMoz.org Thanks in advance - Matt Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Advice on microphones (for loud conventions)
Make sure you get a directional mic. Directionals are great for loud areas because they pickup what you aim into them (your voice). We use a $20 Radio Shack mic for Geek Entertainment TV and it serves us quite well. Unless your going for serious audiofile quality, most people won't tell the difference from a $20 mic to a $150 mic. -eddie On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 05:33:16PM -, Ms. Kitka wrote: This weekend I posted my first footage from a correspondent attending a convention and I'm wondering if anyone has any suggestions for good quality microphones that would cut out as much background noise as possible without muffling the interviewer/interviewee's voices. This week's show containing convention interview footage can be found here: http://libsyn.com/media/mskitka/Kitkast-01-12.mov Kitka http://www.kitkast.com/ Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] GETV does Ryanne and Verdi @ Macworld
We couldn't resist. http://www.geekentertainment.tv/2006/01/11/freevloggers-ryanne-hodson-michael-verdi-at-macworld-expo/ -eddie Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is the videoblogging world better with 1 centralized site?
I've used Libsyn in the past to host podcasts. The reason I went with them at the time was: a) Our Media and Internet Archive while free, often took hours to process a media file upload before being available. b) Stats. Libsyn has awesome detailed stats. I really think this is going to be a differentiator among hosts. Pretty graphs of episode downloads and subscriber trends is important for those who are trying to build an audience. blip.tv has detailed stats too, though without the graphs. Libsyn also claims they have some fancy shmancy distributed network that pushes fresh media files out to edges of the network for quick availability. Also a great feature though I'd love to know specifics on this, like what is their network topology and available bandwidth. -eddie On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 08:22:34PM -, niko_video wrote: What is the advantage of LibSyn over a free site like Veoh (you mentioned earlier)? Is it a question of features or something that works better for you personally? I guess I don't think I should have to pay anything at this point...though I'm not sure how long that will last. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ms. Kitka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem with having one centralized leader for videoblogs is that it would create a monopoly. It's better to have competition in order to find competitive rates and features. I considered getting hosting through YouTube but I didn't like the way they put the YouTube logo on all videos. I want full ownership of my video and I don't want anyone to add their own logo. My videos are hosted by LibSyn for $20/month (about 525mb/month, unlimited bandwidth). There are many free sites if you don't require a lot of space, I personally wouldn't choose YouTube. Kitka --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, niko_video [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder if the videoblogging world is better off with one centralized leader who has streamlined the videoblogging process or more smaller companies competing and doing the same thing? If you could design or set up the world of videoblogging, what would work best for your needs and the needs of the community? Also, does anyone have insight into a site that you think will take on that roll? Youtube seems to be the most popular at the moment. Will it stay that way? Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: Is the videoblogging world better with 1 centralized site?
I think what you're getting at is a centralized directory or index, not one big fat hard drive at the center of the universe. These already exist. http://vlogdir.com/ http://mefeedia.com/ -eddie On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 08:29:05PM -, niko_video wrote: I guess I just keep hoping that the application will change from an art form to a media form where we will see more video footage from 3rd world countries and more video that the established powers don't want us to see. It seems like this type of footage could reach the masses easier if everyone knew one place where to find it. --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Videoblogging is in a distributed, networked, non-centralized environment. -- Enric --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, niko_video [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder if the videoblogging world is better off with one centralized leader who has streamlined the videoblogging process or more smaller companies competing and doing the same thing? If you could design or set up the world of videoblogging, what would work best for your needs and the needs of the community? Also, does anyone have insight into a site that you think will take on that roll? Youtube seems to be the most popular at the moment. Will it stay that way? Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [videoblogging] Re: XXX on Blip.tv
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 12:17:54AM -, Enric wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Halcyon Lujah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We as a part-time professional pornographer, I feel like I should say *something*... Sexual content is just a type of content. Like extreme sports. If it is labeled properly, I don't see the problem. Of course, if a site says , NO PORN then they have to undertake the tide-fighting battle tof trying to keep adult off of an open system. There's also a deluge of spam on open systems. Actions to hold it back are worthy. Most people would agree that spam is not a content type that people WANT to watch. The same can't always be said for porn. Seems like a bigger issue is how does someone like blip or Veoh deal with the newly expanded 2257 reporting requirements? Wouldn't they be considered a secondary producer in the eyes of the feds? -eddie Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[videoblogging] Another newbie de-lurking
Hello most verbose videologgers, I've been following this place off and on for a while and finally bit the bullet and subscribed. This really looks like ground zero for so much in the videologging community. Some of you might know me, others I may have met back in September at Webzine 2005. A lot of your names are starting to become familiar to me. So I've got a little project I kicked off with my good friend Irina a few weeks ago called Geek Entertainment Televison. We go around and do light hearted interviews of our friends and their friends about random projects they're doing in the geekosphere. It's short format, 3-5 minutes, shot on location at various places within the re-inflating bubble. Being in San Francsico, it's been really easy to find people to interview and subjects to cover. I'd love any feedback you guys have. Production quality on the older videos are let's say, not as robust as the newer stuff. We actually plug the mic in now and even use a light. Amazing what a difference that can make. http://www.geekentertainment.tv/ Cheers, -eddie Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/2jUsvC/tzNLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM ~- Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
