Re: [whatwg] [html5] r3820 - [e] (0) step/min/max examples.
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:50:29 +0200, wha...@whatwg.org wrote: Author: ianh Date: 2009-09-13 00:50:28 -0700 (Sun, 13 Sep 2009) New Revision: 3820 Modified: index source Log: [e] (0) step/min/max examples. Modified: index === --- index 2009-09-13 07:40:08 UTC (rev 3819) +++ index 2009-09-13 07:50:28 UTC (rev 3820) @@ -35066,7 +35066,25 @@ /div + div class=example + pThe following date control limits input to dates that are before + the start of the 21st century:/p + + prelt;input name=bday type=date max=2000-12-31gt;/pre + + /div s/2000/1999/ -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Re: [whatwg] [html5] r3820 - [e] (0) step/min/max examples.
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Simon Pieters wrote: On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:50:29 +0200, wha...@whatwg.org wrote: Author: ianh Date: 2009-09-13 00:50:28 -0700 (Sun, 13 Sep 2009) New Revision: 3820 Modified: index source Log: [e] (0) step/min/max examples. Modified: index === --- index 2009-09-13 07:40:08 UTC (rev 3819) +++ index 2009-09-13 07:50:28 UTC (rev 3820) @@ -35066,7 +35066,25 @@ /div + div class=example + pThe following date control limits input to dates that are before + the start of the 21st century:/p + + prelt;input name=bday type=date max=2000-12-31gt;/pre + + /div s/2000/1999/ Since when? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E)\._.,--,'``.fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A/, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Re: [whatwg] [html5] r3820 - [e] (0) step/min/max examples.
On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:52:18 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: s/2000/1999/ Since when? Oops. I thought the 21st century started 2000, but it seems I was wrong. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Re: [whatwg] [html5] r3820 - [e] (0) step/min/max examples.
Quoting Simon Pieters sim...@opera.com: On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 10:52:18 +0200, Ian Hickson i...@hixie.ch wrote: s/2000/1999/ Since when? Oops. I thought the 21st century started 2000, but it seems I was wrong. Since almost everyone uses the zero-based-century convention it would be much less confusing to simply use a different example in which the common and pedantic definitions don't conflict.
