Re: [Wikitech-l] Special pages

2009-02-17 Thread Rotem Liss
Brion Vibber wrote:
 Last week some of the background batch jobs were reorganized to run 
 under a less privileged user account, a good security practice.

 Unfortunately the log files the batch jobs logged to didn't have their 
 ownership updated, so the batch jobs were unable to actually run, due to 
 being unable to open their output files. :P

 I've fixed the file ownership; they should start updating in the next 
 day or two per regular schedule.

 -- brion

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
   
I've checked enwiki and hewiki, and the special pages are still not updated.

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] category page with curious data

2009-02-17 Thread Uwe Baumbach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Uwe Baumbach u.baumb...@web.de wrote:
  after our upgrade to 1.14 we see at one category page:
 
  http://wiki-de.genealogy.net/Kategorie:Stiftung_Stoye/Band_42_(Genealogische_Nachl%C3%A4sse)
 
  that this cat should have 618 pages. But browsing through the pages we can 
  see: they are only 351.
  This correct number is shown by our own mini extension that queries table 
  categorylinks...
 
 Running maintenance/populateCategory.php --force should fix this.  It
 will refresh *all* category table counts, however, not just one.
 There's currently no nice mechanism to force a category size recount,
 other than removing enough entries to get it below 200 and then
 re-adding them.  There's probably a bug open for this somewhere.

Thx - this was the solution!


Uwe (Baumbach)
u.baumb...@web.de

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJmndcFEbayCH8zXkRAs38AJ9xpEyYVA5c/QzBEQlpoLdFkSRIVACeNf8h
kFh9+nPDfXgmGB0frzRbIpc=
=3/nS
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Email notification

2009-02-17 Thread Platonides
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
 Part of the problem is that the measure of job queue length we really
 care about is what was the last job executed?, not how many jobs
 are in the queue?.  If we added a job_timestamp column and put an
 index on it, we could replace (or supplement) the cruddy poor-quality
 estimate we have now with a probably more useful and certainly more
 accurate one.

Agree. Adding job queue lag to Special:Statistics  would benefit both
users and sysadmins.


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] list of recurring maintenance scripts/tasks?

2009-02-17 Thread Platonides
Daniel Friesen wrote:
 Wait... MediaWikians? If we're MediaWikians, then are the users on 
 MediaWiki.org MediaWiki.orgians? Nowait... aha, it's MediaWiki.organs!
 /me goes to see if he can find a way to get the .organs .tld created...; 
 /humor

No, MediaWikians would be the people at MediaWiki.org, people here would
be wikitechians or mediawikialns ;-)


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Email notification

2009-02-17 Thread Aryeh Gregor
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Tim Starling tstarl...@wikimedia.org wrote:
 I'm not sure what good a complaining bot would do, any more than a
 complaining user which we seem to have plenty of. Deleting the jobs was
 not a solution, and can't really be repeated without breaking things.
 There's still a fair bit more programming to do.

I misunderstood the problem, evidently.  I thought it was a one-off
thing due to software bugs the sysadmins didn't know about.  It seems
it's more like a known, ongoing problem whose cause isn't understood
yet, so there's no point in bugging people about it all the time, no.

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


[Wikitech-l] Feature-request: euro-symbol (TeX)

2009-02-17 Thread Michael Florian Schönitzer
Hello,

In several Tex-implementations, Euro-sign (€) can be created by \euro,
\EURO \texteuro or \EUR.
This isn't implemented in Mediawiki jet - but several WP-users have been
asking for it.
Could anyone please do this?

Best Regards,
Michi

-- 
Michael F. Schönitzer
Mail: mich...@schoenitzer.de
Homepage: http://www.schoenitzer.de
Jabber: schoenit...@jabber.ccc.de/Home
ICQ: 294808517

Magdalenenstraße 29
80638 München
Tel: 089/152315


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

Re: [Wikitech-l] Email notification

2009-02-17 Thread Tim Landscheidt
Aryeh Gregor simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Aryeh Gregor
 simetrical+wikil...@gmail.com wrote:
 I misunderstood the problem, evidently.  I thought it was a one-off
 thing due to software bugs the sysadmins didn't know about.  It seems
 it's more like a known, ongoing problem whose cause isn't understood
 yet, so there's no point in bugging people about it all the time, no.

 Although, I still think a oldest job statistic might be useful.

Not only for statistics, it would also provide users with an
opportunity to see whether it is due to the job queue or a
bug if a category membership or a link/template relationship
is not updated soon after the actual edit to article.

  In the same way it would be nice to extend ?action=purge
to log any discrepancies it encounters between the pre- and
post-purge states to ease debugging.

Tim

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] empty parts in print preview and print

2009-02-17 Thread Uwe Baumbach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

 after upgrade to 1.14 we suffer from empty parts in print preview and
 print output at only some pages!
 
 It works only with IE7, FF and other IE versions print well.
 
 Is this a known thing?
 
 Empty part (white area) seems to start right after a toc and then
 ends at not remarkable places within text to show/print the rest of
 an article.

Now there is an example:

One wiki, one article in two versions, that differ only in one paragraph
(4.1 Quickttext), where some characters ' (for formatting italic)
are substituted by .:

http://wiki-test.genealogy.net/w/index.php?title=Stadtdiff=217734oldid=217731

You can see (with IE7 only!) in print preview mode this situation:

* version 217734
(http://wiki-test.genealogy.net/w/index.php?oldid=217734) (the
original text with italic formatting) has empty pieces.

* version 217731
(http://wiki-test.genealogy.net/w/index.php?oldid=217731) suddenly
shows all correct.


We cannot recommand all users not to use IE7 (though we should).
Any suggestions?

Uwe (Baumbach)
u.baumb...@web.de



-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJmt+kFEbayCH8zXkRAnLIAKCFq2ck2Lq47uQWbX72n6k+11l9+wCfc5l7
rA8WyHF26yF9T3uaBoDS4R0=
=9nLx
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Dump processes seem to be dead

2009-02-17 Thread Russell Blau
Andreas Meier andreasmeie...@gmx.de wrote in message 
news:4997d645.8050...@gmx.de...
 Hello,

 the current dump building seem to be dead and perhaps should be killed
 by hand.


Reported: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17535




___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Special pages

2009-02-17 Thread Brion Vibber
On 2/17/09 8:33 AM, Russell Blau wrote:
 Rotem Lissroteml...@gmail.com  wrote in message
 news:499a7134.5090...@gmail.com...
 Brion Vibber wrote:
 Last week some of the background batch jobs were reorganized to run
 under a less privileged user account, a good security practice.

 Unfortunately the log files the batch jobs logged to didn't have their
 ownership updated, so the batch jobs were unable to actually run, due to
 being unable to open their output files. :P

 I've fixed the file ownership; they should start updating in the next
 day or two per regular schedule.

 -- brion
 I've checked enwiki and hewiki, and the special pages are still not
 updated.

 Reported: https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17534

Fixed the cron job for real this time... there were misleading log file 
entries which indicated the problem was different. :P

Actual bug was obsolete hardcoded paths in the batch scripts -- 
attempting to run PHP from /usr/local/bin and grabbing the cluster id 
from /etc/cluster which we apparently no longer use on new machines?

I've started a manual run of the small-wikis updates. Large wikis will 
continue on their regular schedule.

-- brion

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Special pages

2009-02-17 Thread Huib Laurens
Brion,

You Rock!!!

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


[Wikitech-l] Will MediaWiki continue to use GPLv2?

2009-02-17 Thread Trond Olsen
Are there any plans of MediaWiki migrating from GPLv2 to GPLv3? If so, will
GPLv2 still be supported in future release?
___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Will MediaWiki continue to use GPLv2?

2009-02-17 Thread Brion Vibber
On 2/17/09 11:34 AM, Trond Olsen wrote:
 Are there any plans of MediaWiki migrating from GPLv2 to GPLv3? If so, will
 GPLv2 still be supported in future release?

We have no particular plans to update to GPLv3 at this time.

Any particular interest in us converting or not in the future?

-- brion

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Will MediaWiki continue to use GPLv2?

2009-02-17 Thread Trond Olsen
It was in regard to if you're mixing in GPLv2 compatible sourcecode and then
later will be unable to receive security updates if MediaWiki becomes GPLv3
only.

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org wrote:

 On 2/17/09 11:34 AM, Trond Olsen wrote:
  Are there any plans of MediaWiki migrating from GPLv2 to GPLv3? If so,
 will
  GPLv2 still be supported in future release?

 We have no particular plans to update to GPLv3 at this time.

 Any particular interest in us converting or not in the future?

 -- brion

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Will MediaWiki continue to use GPLv2?

2009-02-17 Thread Daniel Friesen
Most GPLed code is GPL version #, or later. That's what MediaWiki is, 
so even if a move to GPLv3 is made anything specifying the , or later 
which all the MW extensions using GPL in svn should be, then that code 
can still be used because the , or later allows the code to be used 
under GPLv3

~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://nadir-seen-fire.com]
-Nadir-Point (http://nadir-point.com)
-Wiki-Tools (http://wiki-tools.com)
-MonkeyScript (http://monkeyscript.nadir-point.com)
-Animepedia (http://anime.wikia.com)
-Narutopedia (http://naruto.wikia.com)
-Soul Eater Wiki (http://souleater.wikia.com)



Trond Olsen wrote:
 It was in regard to if you're mixing in GPLv2 compatible sourcecode and then
 later will be unable to receive security updates if MediaWiki becomes GPLv3
 only.

 On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org wrote:

   
 On 2/17/09 11:34 AM, Trond Olsen wrote:
 
 Are there any plans of MediaWiki migrating from GPLv2 to GPLv3? If so,
   
 will
 
 GPLv2 still be supported in future release?
   
 We have no particular plans to update to GPLv3 at this time.

 Any particular interest in us converting or not in the future?

 -- brion

 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

 


___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Will MediaWiki continue to use GPLv2?

2009-02-17 Thread Trond Olsen
I see now that the different sourcecode mentions GPL version #, or later.
I'm only using the webservices API so misunderstood the COPYING file which
only says GPLv2, but that's only a reference for GPLv2.

Thanks for the answers.

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Daniel Friesen dan_the_...@telus.netwrote:

 Most GPLed code is GPL version #, or later. That's what MediaWiki is,
 so even if a move to GPLv3 is made anything specifying the , or later
 which all the MW extensions using GPL in svn should be, then that code
 can still be used because the , or later allows the code to be used
 under GPLv3

 ~Daniel Friesen (Dantman, Nadir-Seen-Fire) [http://nadir-seen-fire.com]
 -Nadir-Point (http://nadir-point.com)
 -Wiki-Tools (http://wiki-tools.com)
 -MonkeyScript (http://monkeyscript.nadir-point.com)
 -Animepedia (http://anime.wikia.com)
 -Narutopedia (http://naruto.wikia.com)
 -Soul Eater Wiki (http://souleater.wikia.com)



 Trond Olsen wrote:
  It was in regard to if you're mixing in GPLv2 compatible sourcecode and
 then
  later will be unable to receive security updates if MediaWiki becomes
 GPLv3
  only.
 
  On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Brion Vibber br...@wikimedia.org
 wrote:
 
 
  On 2/17/09 11:34 AM, Trond Olsen wrote:
 
  Are there any plans of MediaWiki migrating from GPLv2 to GPLv3? If so,
 
  will
 
  GPLv2 still be supported in future release?
 
  We have no particular plans to update to GPLv3 at this time.
 
  Any particular interest in us converting or not in the future?
 
  -- brion
 
  ___
  Wikitech-l mailing list
  Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
  https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
 
 


 ___
 Wikitech-l mailing list
 Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
 https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l


Re: [Wikitech-l] Will MediaWiki continue to use GPLv2?

2009-02-17 Thread Aryeh Gregor
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Trond Olsen tolse...@gmail.com wrote:
 It was in regard to if you're mixing in GPLv2 compatible sourcecode and then
 later will be unable to receive security updates if MediaWiki becomes GPLv3
 only.

You would in any event be able to receive and apply security updates.
You would, at most, be forbidden from distributing them combined with
the GPLv2-only source code (like, I don't know, if you ported some
function from the Linux kernel to PHP?).

___
Wikitech-l mailing list
Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l