Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
On 10/7/2010 11:30 PM, MZMcBride wrote: Given that Wikimedia already employs a number of contractors who don't work full-time, I think the fact that this position would be full-time is really odd. Damn, I thought the too many Indians and not enough Chiefs problem was just something we faced in hick towns in the U.S. This job isn't really a development job, it seems to be something between a project management and product management job. Someone like this ought to have some insight into software, but the real challenge is going to be herding cats. I don't see this as an entry-level job, but it seems that everybody in the biz only wants to hire entry-level people who'll work 70 hours a week for rice and beans and get thrown away when they start asking for health insurance. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Paul Houle p...@ontology2.com wrote: I don't see this as an entry-level job, but it seems that everybody in the biz only wants to hire entry-level people who'll work 70 hours a week for rice and beans and get thrown away when they start asking for health insurance. Bug triaging, like QA, is something where you really want a talented person doing it, but where talented people usually don't want to do it. It's boring and repetitive, and in the case of bug triaging you have to deal with a lot of idiots and probably aren't allowed to yell at them. So it's most likely an entry-level job -- someone with experience probably will want to do actual programming or something. On a somewhat random side note, I hope we won't encourage the bugmeister to close bugs. Valid bugs or enhancement requests that no one is likely to fix in the foreseeable future should be left open, as long as we'd theoretically accept a patch if someone submitted one and got it reviewed. Projects that close bugs as WONTFIX to mean We don't think this is important enough to fix, or that pester reporters every few months to ask if the problem is still present in hope that they won't respond and the bug can be closed as No response from reporter, annoy me intensely. Healthy projects have lots of open bugs, there's nothing wrong with that. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
Oh, I have plans for them if they have free time...believe me :-). D On 10/9/10 5:44 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: If we do hire a full-time person and that's really more than enough, so that every new bug filed gets a substantive response and is triaged and forwarded to the right people within one business day, and our only problem is what to tell the bugmeister to do with the rest of their time -- then that's a good problem to have! Much better than hiring someone part-time and finding they can't keep up. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
Hoi, If I had anything to say about the importance of the existing back log, I would have the WMF hire two full time people. This would show the importance given to the contributions of volunteer developers. I can imagine that working only on bugs is not that interesting to some. Once the two bugmeisters are in maintenance mode there would be time for something else as well. This kind of carrot is intended to be motivating. The advantage of two people working as a bugmeister is that they can have complementary skills. This would also improve the total quality of the process. Thanks, GerardM On 9 October 2010 01:50, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote: Chad wrote: On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote: +1 I'm assuming you meant +1 to making it a FT position, but you didn't quote any text so I cannot be sure ;-) -Chad I didn't want to quote the full email ;) I agree that reviewing the thousands of open bugs* will take a lot of time. Although if it means the position should be full time would mostly depend on the importance given to the backlog. I agree with this mailing list being a proper place to discuss about the bugmeister position. After all, this is the people with which the bugmeister should work (tech staff + tech community). Neil wrote: I think he was trying to direct your concerns to where they would be heard by the right people and in the right context. Then the right people should be pointed to follow this thread (whoever they are, the CTO for a bugmeister position would have been a fair guess). On the other hand, if this bugmeister discussion was about the budget allocated to its salary instead of the work it has to do, I would move that to foundation-l not wikitech-l *Asking for new/reopen bugs in mediawiki component stops at 2700. There may be more. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
On 10/8/10 4:30 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote: PS there is no stream running nearby that can be used to clean out the stables I love that there are people on this list who knows about the 12 labors. And yes, I think that the Stables is the best metaphor for what awaits. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
On 9 October 2010 08:02, Brandon Harris bhar...@wikimedia.org wrote: On 10/8/10 4:30 AM, Gerard Meijssen wrote: PS there is no stream running nearby that can be used to clean out the stables I love that there are people on this list who knows about the 12 labors. Wikipedians entering pub quizzes is just unfair to the other patrons. - d. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
Original mail not sent to list, re-sending. I hate e-mail. On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org wrote: I don't think that Ryan was trying to shut you down... I think he was trying to direct your concerns to where they would be heard by the right people and in the right context. Realistically, the non-techie strategy and budget people are not going to follow wikitech-l. Realistically, most of the non-administrative techie people are not going to follow the strategy wiki. I'd hope that it's techie administrative people who decide whether a tech position should be part-time or full-time, though, not non-techie administrative people. (Are there techie strategy and budget people too, or are they all non-techie?) On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:58 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote: Personally, I can't see it taking more than a few hours each week (and I say that as someone who's done a fair bit of bug triaging, assigning, and cleanup in this particular tracker). I used to read all the bug mail up until a couple of years ago, presumably when the volume was much lower, and I think I spent a few hours a week handling a lot less than all the bugs. If we do hire a full-time person and that's really more than enough, so that every new bug filed gets a substantive response and is triaged and forwarded to the right people within one business day, and our only problem is what to tell the bugmeister to do with the rest of their time -- then that's a good problem to have! Much better than hiring someone part-time and finding they can't keep up. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
2010/10/8 MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com: I don't see how the link you provided addresses the post you were replying to at all. I think Ryan meant that the hiring a (full-time) Bugmeister was in the annual plan. Roan Kattouw (Catrope) ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
Hoi, It is not that odd when you consider the Herculean job that is awaiting the bugmeister. Thanks, Gerard PS there is no stream running nearby that can be used to clean out the stables On 8 October 2010 05:30, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote: Rob Lanphier wrote: On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:38 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote: Rob Lanphier wrote: I'd like to make everyone aware of this new open position: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Job_openings/Bugmeister Is the position intended to be full-time? Yup. Given that Wikimedia already employs a number of contractors who don't work full-time, I think the fact that this position would be full-time is really odd. MZMcBride ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
It's in the strategic plan: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2010-2011_Annual_Plan_Questions_and_Answers I don't see how the link you provided addresses the post you were replying to at all. As Roan pointed out, I was telling you that a full time Bugmeister was in the annual plan, if you had bothered to click the link, and searched for Bugmeister. If you'd like to discuss this, I think the strategy wiki is the right spot. Not wikitech-l. It's okay to advertise the position on wikitech-l, but not discuss it on wikitech-l? Okay. The strategy wiki is pretty much dead, so I guess I'll just move on. Wikitech-l is for technical discussions. I'm not saying you *need* to discuss this on strategy wiki, but this isn't this right place for it. Maybe foundation-l? Let's keep this list on topic. - Ryan ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
I don't think its really that off topic, we've certainly done worse. Plus, foundation-l is useless. -Chad On Oct 8, 2010 11:15 AM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote: It's in the strategic plan: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2010-2011_Annual_Plan_Que... As Roan pointed out, I was telling you that a full time Bugmeister was in the annual plan, if you had bothered to click the link, and searched for Bugmeister. If you'd like to discuss this, I think the strategy wiki is the right spot. Not wikitech-l. ... Wikitech-l is for technical discussions. I'm not saying you *need* to discuss this on strategy wiki, but this isn't this right place for it. Maybe foundation-l? Let's keep this list on topic. - Ryan ___ Wikitech-l mailing list wikitec...@lists.wikimedia ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:30 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote: Given that Wikimedia already employs a number of contractors who don't work full-time, I think the fact that this position would be full-time is really odd. I think a full-time position is really needed here. There are lots of bugs filed, and it's not trivial to triage them, try to extract more information from users, assign them to the right people, and make sure those people fix them. Plus, the bugmeister could actually fix some of the bugs in their spare time. Plenty of work for a full-time position. On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Ryan Lane rlan...@gmail.com wrote: If you'd like to discuss this, I think the strategy wiki is the right spot. Not wikitech-l. Things should be discussed wherever there are the most interested, informed people. Developers are some of the people who are most interested and informed about what resources are being allocated to things like bug handling, so wikitech-l is a good place for a discussion on this, IMO (although not the only legitimate place). ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
+1 ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote: +1 I'm assuming you meant +1 to making it a FT position, but you didn't quote any text so I cannot be sure ;-) -Chad ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
On 10/8/10 1:05 PM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:37 AM, Ryan Lanerlan...@gmail.com wrote: If you'd like to discuss this, I think the strategy wiki is the right spot. Not wikitech-l. Things should be discussed wherever there are the most interested, informed people. I don't think that Ryan was trying to shut you down... I think he was trying to direct your concerns to where they would be heard by the right people and in the right context. Realistically, the non-techie strategy and budget people are not going to follow wikitech-l. Danese (and the rest of the WMF tech staffers) do read this list, but most of us think hiring someone local to SF is a good thing, so we're not the best people to be advocates for your point. -- Neil Kandalgaonkar ne...@wikimedia.org ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
Ryan Lane wrote: It's in the strategic plan: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2010-2011_Annual_Plan_Questions_and_Answers I don't see how the link you provided addresses the post you were replying to at all. As Roan pointed out, I was telling you that a full time Bugmeister was in the annual plan, if you had bothered to click the link, and searched for Bugmeister. Please don't be snide and wrong at the same time. Pick one. I don't see anything in that link (or in the related PDF) about a Bugmeister position being full-time. (Though feel free to quote a specific section if you think I've missed something.) As I said earlier, it's pretty common for Wikimedia to hire folks on a non-full-time basis[1] (especially in tech roles), which is why I found it odd that this particular position is intended to be full-time. Aryeh Gregor wrote: On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 11:30 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote: Given that Wikimedia already employs a number of contractors who don't work full-time, I think the fact that this position would be full-time is really odd. I think a full-time position is really needed here. There are lots of bugs filed, and it's not trivial to triage them, try to extract more information from users, assign them to the right people, and make sure those people fix them. Plus, the bugmeister could actually fix some of the bugs in their spare time. Plenty of work for a full-time position. Personally, I can't see it taking more than a few hours each week (and I say that as someone who's done a fair bit of bug triaging, assigning, and cleanup in this particular tracker). Though I suppose it's likely that the scope of the role would expand over time past Bugzilla. From discussions with some of the people involved in creating this position, it seems that Wikimedia is specifically looking for someone who _isn't_ a (PHP) developer because that type of person would want to fix these bugs themselves and there's a serious concern that a developer would very likely quickly get bored with the job after a few weeks. That's my understanding, at least. MZMcBride [1] http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_contractors ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
Chad wrote: On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Platonides platoni...@gmail.com wrote: +1 I'm assuming you meant +1 to making it a FT position, but you didn't quote any text so I cannot be sure ;-) -Chad I didn't want to quote the full email ;) I agree that reviewing the thousands of open bugs* will take a lot of time. Although if it means the position should be full time would mostly depend on the importance given to the backlog. I agree with this mailing list being a proper place to discuss about the bugmeister position. After all, this is the people with which the bugmeister should work (tech staff + tech community). Neil wrote: I think he was trying to direct your concerns to where they would be heard by the right people and in the right context. Then the right people should be pointed to follow this thread (whoever they are, the CTO for a bugmeister position would have been a fair guess). On the other hand, if this bugmeister discussion was about the budget allocated to its salary instead of the work it has to do, I would move that to foundation-l not wikitech-l *Asking for new/reopen bugs in mediawiki component stops at 2700. There may be more. ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
Rob Lanphier wrote: On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:38 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote: Rob Lanphier wrote: I'd like to make everyone aware of this new open position: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Job_openings/Bugmeister Is the position intended to be full-time? Yup. Given that Wikimedia already employs a number of contractors who don't work full-time, I think the fact that this position would be full-time is really odd. MZMcBride ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
Given that Wikimedia already employs a number of contractors who don't work full-time, I think the fact that this position would be full-time is really odd. It's in the strategic plan: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2010-2011_Annual_Plan_Questions_and_Answers If you'd like to discuss this, I think the strategy wiki is the right spot. Not wikitech-l. Respectfully, Ryan Lane ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
Ryan Lane wrote: Given that Wikimedia already employs a number of contractors who don't work full-time, I think the fact that this position would be full-time is really odd. It's in the strategic plan: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2010-2011_Annual_Plan_Questions_and_Answers I don't see how the link you provided addresses the post you were replying to at all. If you'd like to discuss this, I think the strategy wiki is the right spot. Not wikitech-l. It's okay to advertise the position on wikitech-l, but not discuss it on wikitech-l? Okay. The strategy wiki is pretty much dead, so I guess I'll just move on. MZMcBride ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
[Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
Hi everyone, I'd like to make everyone aware of this new open position: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Job_openings/Bugmeister The goal for the person hired to this position is to sift through the many, many bugs we have in Bugzilla, and surface the ones that are most important for everyone to focus on. We're looking for someone who understands our editing community and developer community, and isn't intimidated by Bugzilla or its trappings. However, we're *not* looking for someone with 10+ years of development experience. We think this is a really good entry-level position for someone who is eager to work with Wikimedia Foundation and is interested in the technical problems, but isn't (yet) suited to be a developer or other more technical role. This position represents a great opportunity for someone interested in learning the ropes here. That said, we want to make sure we hire someone who is going to stick with it for a little while, rather than get bored after a month or two and wander off to do something else. We imagine this person is going to be responsible for running community triage discussions, updating fields in Bugzilla, helping update our bug filing documentation, and helping members from our editing community file quality bug reports. We want someone who really wants to do a fantastic job with this for a year or two before moving on to other roles. If you're interested, please apply! (and let me know that you did) If you're someone who hangs around on this mailing list, IRC, etc, please make sure to point that out in your cover letter, along with the id you use around these parts. Rob ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
Rob Lanphier wrote: I'd like to make everyone aware of this new open position: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Job_openings/Bugmeister I edited that page yesterday. Two parts were unclear to me, though: Is the position intended to be full-time? And are local candidates really preferred? MZMcBride ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
Re: [Wikitech-l] Bugmeister opening at Wikimedia Foundation
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:38 PM, MZMcBride z...@mzmcbride.com wrote: Rob Lanphier wrote: I'd like to make everyone aware of this new open position: http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Job_openings/Bugmeister I edited that page yesterday. Two parts were unclear to me, though: Is the position intended to be full-time? Yup. And are local candidates really preferred? All other things being equal, then having someone in the SF office would be preferred to someone working remotely. For an entry-level job like this, it's pretty tough to learn the ropes of the job and also learn everything necessary to be successful outside the main office. For a remote candidate to be considered, they'd pretty much have to already be part of the community and have demonstrated that they can do the job. Rob ___ Wikitech-l mailing list Wikitech-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
