https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48636
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48636/0001-Ticket-48636-Improve-replication-convergence.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi William,
I troubleshoot failures at the tickets.
And both tickets/ticket48798_test.py and lib389/tests/nss_ssl_test.py
fail because of the same problem.
As I understand this is because of class design issue (lib389/nss_ssl.py).
Can you please take a look? May be you've already faced that
Hi team,
please review:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48326
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48326/0001-Ticket-48326-Move-CI-test-to-config-test-suite-and-r.patch
Thanks,
Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
389-devel mailing list
Hi,
I've now closed and finished #48820 and #48853.
There is still a long way to go but we've hit some major goals here. I just
don't want these tickets to keep growing!
We now have a new way to manage objects in lib389, and we are starting to use
them, and work out the kinks. The best for
Note: Resent due to earlier technical issues.
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 17:52 +0200, Simon Pichugin wrote:
>
> Hi William,
>
> I troubleshoot failures at the tickets.
> And both tickets/ticket48798_test.py and lib389/tests/nss_ssl_test.py
> fail because of the same problem.
> As I understand this
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48877
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48877/0001-Ticket-48877-Fixes-for-RPM-spec-with-spectool.patch
--
Sincerely,
William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Brisbane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48404
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48404/0001-Ticket-48404-libslapd-owned-by-libs-and-devel.patch
--
Sincerely,
William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Brisbane
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
