[389-users] Re: unattended request cert process

2020-12-02 Thread William Brown
> On 2 Dec 2020, at 19:04, Angel Bosch Mora wrote: > >> depending on your version of 389, look at "dsctl tls >> import-ca" >> >> {william@ldapkdc 9:12} ~/development $ dsctl localhost tls import-ca >> --help >> usage: dsctl [instance] tls import-ca [-h] cert_path nickname >> >> positional

[389-users] Re: unattended request cert process

2020-12-02 Thread Fong, Trevor
Hi abosch, Have you looked at preconfiguring the cert db's with a wildcard cert from a CA to avoid the request/sign dance? Trev On 2020-12-02, 1:04 AM, "Angel Bosch Mora" wrote: [CAUTION: Non-UBC Email] > depending on your version of 389, look at "dsctl tls > import-ca"

[389-users] Re: unattended request cert process

2020-12-02 Thread Angel Bosch Mora
> depending on your version of 389, look at "dsctl tls > import-ca" > > {william@ldapkdc 9:12} ~/development $ dsctl localhost tls import-ca > --help > usage: dsctl [instance] tls import-ca [-h] cert_path nickname > > positional arguments: > cert_path The path to the x509 cert to import as

[389-users] Re: unattended request cert process

2020-12-01 Thread William Brown
depending on your version of 389, look at "dsctl tls import-ca" {william@ldapkdc 9:12} ~/development $ dsctl localhost tls import-ca --help usage: dsctl [instance] tls import-ca [-h] cert_path nickname positional arguments: cert_path The path to the x509 cert to import as a server CA