[Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi Security's ContextHolder replaced by SecurityContext

2005-05-07 Thread Ben Alex
Pursuant to Juergen's recommendation (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.springframework.devel/8290), Acegi Security CVS has now had its ContextHolder and related classes removed. This functionality has been replaced by SecurityContext, which is an InheritableThreadLocal that provides a

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi Security's ContextHolder replaced by SecurityContext

2005-05-07 Thread Colin Sampaleanu
Ben Alex wrote: Pursuant to Juergen's recommendation (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.springframework.devel/8290), Acegi Security CVS has now had its ContextHolder and related classes removed. This functionality has been replaced by SecurityContext, which is an InheritableThreadLocal

Re: [Springframework-developer] Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi Security's ContextHolder replaced by SecurityContext

2005-05-07 Thread Colin Sampaleanu
Colin Sampaleanu wrote: Ben Alex wrote: Pursuant to Juergen's recommendation (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.springframework.devel/8290), Acegi Security CVS has now had its ContextHolder and related classes removed. This functionality has been replaced by SecurityContext, which is an

Re: [Springframework-developer] Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi Security's ContextHolder replaced by SecurityContext

2005-05-07 Thread Scott McCrory
I'm not using it to this extent, but the logic sounds good to me :-) Scott On Sat, 07 May 2005 17:33:34 -0400, Colin Sampaleanu wrote Colin Sampaleanu wrote: Ben Alex wrote: Pursuant to Juergen's recommendation (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.springframework.devel/8290),