Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Proposal: Resolving Eclipse IDE warnings

2005-11-06 Thread Vijay Varadan
+1 Agree - I would appreciate this greatly.On 11/6/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:When using Eclipse 3.1 there are quite a few (520) source code warnings displayed in the Problems view.At some point I'd like to resolve as many of these as makes sense (likeunuseed imports) and then

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Proposal: Resolving Eclipse IDE warnings

2005-11-06 Thread scott
Thanks for the vote! I've created http://opensource2.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-93and will start working the "less risky" ones so as not to affect 0.9.0's schedule. Scott From: Vijay Varadan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2005 3:46 PMTo:

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Proposal: Resolving Eclipse IDE warnings

2005-11-06 Thread Ben Alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When using Eclipse 3.1 there are quite a few (520) source code warnings displayed in the Problems view. At some point I'd like to resolve as many of these as makes sense (like unuseed imports) and then to update the .settings/org.eclipse.jdt.core.prefs file to ignore

[Acegisecurity-developer] Vote: Release 0.9.0

2005-11-06 Thread Ben Alex
Hi everyone The JIRA changelog is now complete, and I've just updated the reference guide to reflect the latest changes: http://opensource2.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel I would like to propose we release 0.9.0 at this

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Vote: Release 0.9.0

2005-11-06 Thread Mark St.Godard
+1 On 11/6/05, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyoneThe JIRA changelog is now complete, and I've just updated the referenceguide to reflect the latest changes: http://opensource2.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel I would

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Vote: Release 0.9.0

2005-11-06 Thread scott
Can Ihave until Tuesday to test 0.9.0-SNAPSHOT with our Siteminder-integrated application? We additionally make extensive use of Authz tags andmethod interceptors and I'd like to run them through their paces first. Scott From: Mark St.Godard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

[Acegisecurity-developer] AuthenticationException - UserDetails

2005-11-06 Thread Herryanto Siatono
Just a point to ponder, for AuthenticationException thrown after user has been checked against the database, (e.g. BadCredentialsException), should it contain the UserDetails generated by the authentication provider? Reason behind, for cases where the username is converted to user Id by the

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Vote: Release 0.9.0

2005-11-06 Thread Ray Krueger
+1 for Tuesday On 11/6/05, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can I have until Tuesday to test 0.9.0-SNAPSHOT with our Siteminder-integrated application? We additionally make extensive use of Authz tags and method interceptors and I'd like to run them through

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] AuthenticationException - UserDetails

2005-11-06 Thread Ben Alex
Herryanto Siatono wrote: Just a point to ponder, for AuthenticationException thrown after user has been checked against the database, (e.g. BadCredentialsException), should it contain the UserDetails generated by the authentication provider? Reason behind, for cases where the username is

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] AuthenticationException - UserDetails

2005-11-06 Thread Herryanto Siatono
+1, That's fast. Thx!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Alex Sent: 07 November 2005 11:03 To: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] AuthenticationException - UserDetails Herryanto Siatono