Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi 0.8.3 to 0.9.0 errors

2005-11-08 Thread Ray Krueger
Tiny URL version: http://tinyurl.com/8zhka On 11/7/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oliver, Very, very interesting - excellent find. I have several things to test tomorrow. Scott -Original Message- From: Oliver Hutchison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi 0.8.3 to 0.9.0 errors

2005-11-08 Thread Scott McCrory
Oliver, You were absolutely right - it's an IBM JDK 1.3 issue. I can't post to the developer group from work right now, so could you forward this for me? I started WSAD 5.1 and its Websphere 5.0's test environment in run mode (debug disabled) and everything ran fine with 0.9.0-SNAPSHOT, but

FW: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi 0.8.3 to 0.9.0 errors

2005-11-08 Thread Oliver Hutchison
Forwarded on for Scott -Original Message- From: Scott McCrory [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 9 November 2005 3:10 AM To: Oliver Hutchison Cc: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi 0.8.3 to 0.9.0 errors Oliver, You were

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 0.9.0

2005-11-08 Thread Matt Raible
On Nov 3, 2005, at 9:51 AM, Ben Alex wrote: Hi everyone CVS now contains pretty much all the tasks scheduled for 0.9.0. The roadmap is at: http://opensource2.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC? report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel I'd be grateful if

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 0.9.0

2005-11-08 Thread Ben Alex
Matt Raible wrote: // log user in automatically Authentication auth = new UsernamePasswordAuthenticationToken (user.getUsername(), user.getConfirmPassword()); auth.sentAuthenticated(true); try { ProviderManager authenticationManager = (ProviderManager)

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi 0.8.3 to 0.9.0 errors

2005-11-08 Thread Ben Alex
Ben Alex wrote: I'd prefer to avoid multiple releases floating around. We should revert back to a standard ThreadLocal and not an InheritableThreadLocal and release 0.9.0. Does anyone really require InheritableThreadLocal behaviour? I've checked in the change to use ThreadLocal. This is

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Acegi 0.8.3 to 0.9.0 errors

2005-11-08 Thread Scott McCrory
Quoting Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Ben Alex wrote: I'd prefer to avoid multiple releases floating around. We should revert back to a standard ThreadLocal and not an InheritableThreadLocal and release 0.9.0. Does anyone really require InheritableThreadLocal behaviour? I've checked in the