RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Proposal: Rename AuthenticationDao interface

2005-11-17 Thread Darrell Kundel
+1 I support the change, it makes more sense to me. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ben Alex Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 9:23 AM To: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Proposal:

[Acegisecurity-developer] Improvement request: RegExpBasedFilterInvocationDefinitionMap can also use jdk 1.4 regex

2005-11-17 Thread Geoffrey De Smet
The spring framework has many classes with uses regex. If it's running in jdk 1.4 or higher, those classes use the jdk regex. If not, they require oro. RegExpBasedFilterInvocationDefinitionMap always requires the oro regex engine. Can it be improved so it behaves like

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Proposal: Rename AuthenticationDao interface

2005-11-17 Thread Dmitriy Kopylenko
+1 also Darrell Kundel wrote: +1 I support the change, it makes more sense to me. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ben Alex Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 9:23 AM To: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re:

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Proposal: Rename AuthenticationDao interface

2005-11-17 Thread Ray Krueger
lol Sorry Scott :) When Ben puts it like that I gotta agree hehe. +1 On 11/17/05, Dmitriy Kopylenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 also Darrell Kundel wrote: +1 I support the change, it makes more sense to me. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Proposal: Rename AuthenticationDao interface

2005-11-17 Thread Tim Kettering
+1 from me too. I think its better to break stuff now when we still have a excuse (hey, it ain't 1.0 yet) than post 1.0. -tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Krueger Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 10:01 AM To:

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] possible contribution

2005-11-17 Thread Ben Munat
So, should I take the silence to mean that no one is interested in this? b Ben Munat wrote: Hello All, First off, congratulations on the release of 0.90! I'll have to download it and migrate my stuff using 0.83. Seeing the announcement reminded me that I've been meaning to write to offer

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] possible contribution

2005-11-17 Thread Mark St.Godard
Ben M - I would submit an JIRA entry and people could vote on it , plus it would also get more visability. You found a need for it could be useful to other Acegi users. Cheers, Mark On 11/17/05, Scott McCrory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Ben Munat [EMAIL PROTECTED]: So, should I take

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] possible contribution

2005-11-17 Thread Ben Munat
Thanks very juch... I'll look into that. b Mark St.Godard wrote: Ben M - I would submit an JIRA entry and people could vote on it , plus it would also get more visability. You found a need for it could be useful to other Acegi users. Cheers, Mark On 11/17/05, *Scott McCrory* [EMAIL