BTW there is a new Eclipse plugin for Maven that can import maven
projects directly and keep the classpath synced from the pom
http://code.google.com/p/q4e/
Disclaimer: I work on the project
On 9/10/07, Ray Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why isn't it?
If you're only interested in working on
there's no way to create eclipse files for the parent directory,
eclipse doesn't support hierarchical projects (one inside another one)
On 5/1/07, Ray Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm. That should do it. I work with IDEA not eclipse though, I am not
sure if that stuff works.
Jetbrains
On 4/21/07, Ray Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Maven 2.0.5 and 2.0.6 both cause the
AuthorizeTagExpressionLanguageTests to fail, whereas 2.0.4 builds it
fine.
what is the problem? it passes for me
* The contacts sample cannot be built with maven2 from the
instructions on our website,
.
We had a discussion a few months back with one of the users having the
same problem. I have no idea what the issue is, but it always fails
for me.
There is even a bug open for this.
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-445
On 4/23/07, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED
?
On 4/23/07, Ray Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Running a clean test now, I'll update the bug.
Any ideas on the war/multiwar thing? Is there a maven2 equivalent to
multiwar?
On 4/23/07, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i can't reproduce with 2.0.6
I need the test report
stays silent
about the what test went wrong?
Why would deleting my repository change fix the 2.0.5 problem, when it
builds fine with 2.0.4 using the same repository?
On 2/27/07, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i use 2.0.5 and builds fine for me
try deleting your local repo ~/.m2
run mvn install from the root folder before trying to build the
samples so you have the latest acegi jars. Or change the sample to use
last release instead of using snapshots.
On 2/26/07, Brad Cox, Ph.D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could someone here please advise on how to get started using
First, i'm very familiar with how acegi m2 build works, and I do know
how Maven resolves transitive dependencies. In both cases i can say
that I wrote it, literally ;)
if you do take a look to the library folder you will see that there
are no jars in both 1.2.8 and 2.0.2, they are all different.
On 2/16/07, Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm willing to bet this problem is caused by using the full Spring
dependency rather than fine-grained Spring dependencies. I use the
full Spring dependency and have experienced this issue as well. It's
too bad there's not a way in Maven to
.
Perhaps, I'm doing something wrong in my config, I just can't seem to find
it. (remember, I'm using Maven For Ant, not Maven directly).
Thanks again,
Kyle
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 17:07:16 -0800
From: Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer
Remember to add the notice.txt file as the ASL requires
https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/acegisecurity/trunk/acegisecurity/notice.txt
On 12/12/06, Olivier Grisel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am working on the LDAP directory connector for the Nuxeo5 ECM platform and I
found your
Hi,
I'd like to remove the Maven 1 build completely because now we are
half way. Samples for instance don't build with maven 2.
AFAIK there's still some things that need work in Maven 2, like the
docbook generation, please raise any concerns, and things that still
don't work under Maven 2 so I
+1 to m2
On 10/30/06, Luke Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've set up a new automated build using maven 2 which is temporarily
generating a site at
http://monkeymachine.eu/acegisecurity/
until I have time to get it licked into shape properly (n.b. I'm not
looking for any
i know about this one but never tried it
http://mojo.codehaus.org/docbook-maven-plugin/introduction.html
On 10/30/06, Aleksei Valikov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi.
What's the docbook plugin support like in Maven 2, Carlos?
I can probably set something up to generate the docs separately if
I can't right now, I'm in Munich for the Oktoberfest and I can't
guarantee my accuracy ;)
I'll check for your commits by the weekend in case you already started it.
On 9/26/06, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
1.0.2 is now ready to release. Carlos, were you still able to take care
of
It's not automated. As soon as we decide to go for m2 we can automate that.
On 9/15/06, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
I've been deploying snapshot in the maven2 repo after changing stuff
http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net/repository/snapshots
On 9/7/06, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Will it be possible to make a 1.0.2 bug release in the next two weeks?
I can go thorugh all the release process, i just would like to know if
people agree in taking what it is curently in svn and tag it as 1.0.2.
Hi Carlos
just one line:
mvn eclipse:eclipse -DdownloadSources=true
and you'll see how sources and javadocs are downloaded and linked in
eclipse project
maven makes:
acegi-security-1.0.1.jar binaries
acegi-security-1.0.1-sources.jar sources
acegi-security-1.0.1-javadoc.jar javadocs
I think it'll be
recognize the source code when it is
distributed inside the compiled Jar?
I don't think so and I don't really like that approach because if you
provide the sources, why don't provide the javadocs too?
On 8/28/06, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just one line:
mvn eclipse:eclipse
On 8/28/06, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ray Krueger wrote:
Ben were you suggesting having acegi-version.jar would be just binary,
and acegi-version-sources.jar would be binary with source?
Yes, a traditional .class-only JAR, and a combined .class plus .java
JAR. People like me would
anyone?
On 7/20/06, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just wondering what people think about protected empty constructor
so I can extend that classes instead of write wrappers.
On 7/20/06, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have removed the default constructors added
I have removed the default constructors added.
On 7/17/06, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luke Taylor wrote:
I agree that reusability is important but I'm not convinced that these
changes are justified on this basis, or that is just about balancing
reusability and ease of use. The use
hi,
I'm pretty confused with these two interfaces.
Seems that the two implementations
PathBasedFilterInvocationDefinitionMap and
RegExpBasedFilterInvocationDefinitionMap implement both.
FilterInvocationDefinitionSourceEditor instead of returning
FilterInvocationDefinitionSource it returns
provides additional
information on Acegi Security's features, access to online
documentation, and links to download the latest release.
Regards
Carlos Sanchez
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
Using
I took the freedom also to tag the source tree and bump the pom
versions to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT
On 5/30/06, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll take care of that
On 5/30/06, Ray Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we get the maven repos updated?
Right now mvn compile fails because
I'm afraid it's true. It no longer compiles under Spring 1.2.7.
Something to log in JIRA for a 1.0.1.
On 5/31/06, Ben Munat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We upgraded to the 1.0 final jar the other day and things worked fine on our
dev build,
which uses an InMemoryDao implementation. However,
PROTECTED] wrote:
I saw that, my should it have been 1.0.1 though?
On 5/30/06, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I took the freedom also to tag the source tree and bump the pom
versions to 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT
On 5/30/06, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll take care
Sorry it wasn't spotted earlier. Perhaps we should change the Spring
maven dependency back to 1.2.8 to detect this kind of thing?
That's what i suggested some time ago. In fact for now only 1.2.7 is in ibiblio.
___
Home: http://acegisecurity.org
McCrory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Sorry it wasn't spotted earlier. Perhaps we should change the Spring
maven dependency back to 1.2.8 to detect this kind of thing?
That's what i suggested some time ago. In fact for now only 1.2.7 is in
ibiblio.
Wouldn't
Remeber that there's a Maven 2 repository now at
http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net/repository/releases/
I just deployed the 1.0.0, with sources and javadocs. I changed maven
deployed jars for the ones in the distribution because they are signed
by Ben.
It'll be synced to the main maven
I'll take care of that
On 5/30/06, Ray Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we get the maven repos updated?
Right now mvn compile fails because
org.acegisecurity:acegi-security-parent:pom:1.0.0 cannot be
downloaded.
On 5/30/06, Mark St.Godard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ben,
The
.
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
I suggest to Luke to wipe out his local repo and try.
I think it's best to have the initialization in the constructor or
errors wil lbe hard to debug.
On 5/27/06, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luke Taylor wrote:
I'm not seeing any problems with the latest
there was a maven.build.dir property. Is that
still available in maven 2 and is it set as a system property?
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Right now it seems to work for me. it'd be a good idea if you can, to
change that temp directory to target/something, so it's deleted during
clean
On 5/28/06
The problem is in
org.acegisecurity.ldap.AbstractLdapServerTestCase
private static final LdapTestServer SERVER = new LdapTestServer();
This call causes an exception. As it's a static field it happens at
the time the class is loaded, so the class can't be loaded. Static and
junit ant tasks don't
I suggest to Luke to wipe out his local repo and try.
I think it's best to have the initialization in the constructor or
errors wil lbe hard to debug.
On 5/27/06, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luke Taylor wrote:
I'm not seeing any problems with the latest code... I just rebuilt the
web
Check it out here:
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DOXIA-59?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.ext.subversion:subversion-commits-tabpanel
On 4/27/06, Baz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/27/06, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the sake of consistency and ease of reviewing history logs, would
are upgrading to maven 2 then there shouldn't be a
problem with apacheds RC1.
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
I have committed some changes, now the problems are with ldap
dependencies, can somebody check if we can upgrade to a non snapshot
dependency? there's alreaddy RC1 of apache directory in ibiblio
I have committed some changes, now the problems are with ldap
dependencies, can somebody check if we can upgrade to a non snapshot
dependency? there's alreaddy RC1 of apache directory in ibiblio.
On 4/25/06, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Looks right, only that
https
Looks right, only that
https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/acegisecurity/trunk/CVSROOT should
be deleted
On 4/24/06, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ben Alex wrote:
Last weekend SF had some CVS issues, so I didn't make the switch as
intended.
I'm now going to hold-off doing this until
I've uploaded the jars. poms will need to wait for a bit
On 4/12/06, Parrott, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
I was wondering if someone with access could post the 1.0.0-RC2 archive to
the Maven2 repo at ibiblio. I see he RC1 version but not the RC2. Thanks.
-Jason Parrott
--
I
+1
On 3/25/06, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone
SourceForge have recently modified their offering so we can migrate to
SVN (without losing revision history) - see
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=31070group_id=1#import.
I have also been using SVN recently
Maven2 build is not yet ready. Everything should work with maven 1.0.2
out of the box, the repositories are already added in the project.xml
On 3/6/06, Jaap Reitsma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have tried to follow the instructions to build Acegi Security with maven
1.0.2 as well as
.
The problem is discussed here:
http://www.nabble.com/Re:-upgrading-to-nlog4j.1.2.17-p1089156.html
If we can exclude log4j, that might do the trick. How is that achieved?
I think it's appearing as a transitive dependency from somewhere else...
Thanks,
Luke.
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
Hi
The test output is in the target folder test-reports or something like that
On 2/1/06, Ray Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to jump in and see why the Jaas tests would be failing,
but I cannot get Maven to play nice. Any ideas anyone? Carlos? *nudge
nudge*
[junit] [DEBUG]
that ClassDefNotFound is from? Just so I
understand how to read that next time.
On 2/1/06, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The test output is in the target folder test-reports or something like that
On 2/1/06, Ray Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to jump in and see why
It is clearer in the test output
On 2/1/06, Ray Krueger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hehe yeah that I knwew :P
I was hoping Maven could be a little clearer on what class. I think
it's the last one it's trying to Find NameComponentNormalizer. Would
that be correct?
On 2/1/06, Carlos Sanchez
beginig with 1.0.0 it's under org.acegisecurity groupId
m2 it's not suported yet, but it works
On 1/20/06, Jettro Coenradie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying to get maven 2 to work with a spring example. I am having some
issues or questions that I hope someone can help with.
First
Hi,
I've notice that this change was included after the RC1. This goes
against the version naming policy, 1.0.0 must be the same as 1.0.0-RC1
except for critical bug fixes.
It'd be better to create a branch for 1.0.0 from the 1.0.0-RC1 tag and
set HEAD to 1.1, where you could keep development.
I upgraded the maven jalopy plugin to the latest jalopy jar and I'm
getting exceptions.
On 11/26/05, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark St.Godard wrote:
Hey Ben,
Have you had any luck getting the latest Jalopy plugin ?
When I go to:
I believe this can be solved upgrading the jalopy version
http://jalopy.sourceforge.net/
Let me take a look.
On 11/24/05, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone
We're making good progress towards releasing 1.0.0 RC 1, the target date
of which is 4 December 2005 (to coincide with The
I'm working on that. You'll have news soon.
On 11/7/05, Andreas Brenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me the Maven 2 build (SEC-62) is not up-to-date and should
be marked as unresolved.
Regards,
Andreas
On 11/7/05, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The JIRA changelog is now
keen
to start using it.
cheers,
Luke.
P.S. +1 I'm all for doing the release if no one has any reported problems.
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
I'm working on that. You'll have news soon.
On 11/7/05, Andreas Brenk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me the Maven 2 build (SEC-62) is not up
Try running clean first. Seems that you've compiled classes with
clover and maven is picking those.
On 11/5/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I'm having trouble running the core test:test maven goal to run.
Any ideas on what I'm doing wrong?
Thanks,
It works for me in maven 1.1-beta-2. Deprecated properties still work.
On 11/4/05, Ballard, Ken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Someone I work with pointed out that the instructions for checking out Maven
[http://www.acegisecurity.org/building.html] don't work. It might just be
because the SCM
Hi,
I've uploaded the results of the cobertura report for acegi core
project, if you like we can add them to the generated reports (and
maybe remove commercial clover). One drawback is that afaik it doesn't
allow filtering statements like logging.
://maven.apache.org/reference/plugins/java/properties.html), but I
don't think that's a common case.
Regards
Carlos Sanchez
http://www.jroller.com/page/carlossg
On 8/21/05, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark St.Godard wrote:
I just wanted to make sure I dont check in code that breaks JDK
+1
Regards
Carlos Sanchez
On 7/28/05, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott McCrory wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:17:29 +1000, Ben Alex wrote
Hi everyone
Now that we've got 14 developers with CVS rights, and we've recently
introduced JIRA, I wish to propose some project
To sum up,
I'll create a class called net.sf.acegisecurity.FilterChain, with a property
called filters.
About the syntax, I looked at map, that would suit here, but Spring
application context don't allow beans as keys, maybe a lack of
functionality?
If we use this one we lose validation, so
Hi all,
The docbook stuff should be ready now. I'm trying to release the maven sdocbook
plugin, so we can remove the SNAPSHOT dependency, in
the meantime I've created a dated version so it doesn't get downloaded every
time.
Regards
Carlos Sanchez
A Coruña, Spain
http://www.jroller.com/page
I'm moving docs now, I'll take a look to the stylesheet later this week.
I agree with your multiproject suggestion.
Regards
Carlos Sanchez
A Coruña, Spain
http://www.jroller.com/page/carlossg
-Original Message-
From: Ben Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 14
/value
/property
/bean
Regards
Carlos Sanchez
A Coruña, Spain
Oness Project
http://oness.sourceforge.net
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ben Alex
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 1:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Acegisecurity-developer] Maven Build in CVS
Thanks to Carlos Sanchez for providing
62 matches
Mail list logo
