Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Security Annotation support (initial)

2005-08-22 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Hi, I'd really encourage the use of two jars, core and core-tiger, instead of packaging the tiger classes inside core jar, because the core-tiger probably depends on core and you don't want core to depend on tiger. You'll notice the problem of that approach in any tool with transitive dependency

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Security Annotation support (initial)

2005-08-21 Thread Mark St.Godard
Hey Ben, Just wanted to mention, I have started converting over the attributes sample apps over to Java 5 annotations version. (Havent checked in yet) samples/attributes (Commons) samples/annotations (Java 5) Basically, I ported over the BankService code and created tests. Also, I did port

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Security Annotation support (initial)

2005-08-21 Thread Ben Alex
Mark St.Godard wrote: I just wanted to make sure I dont check in code that breaks JDK 1.4 users from building the CVS HEAD examples, etc. Therefore to sum up: - can we package the core-tiger classes into the single acegi security dist? - where should the new samples (for java5) be located?

[Acegisecurity-developer] Security Annotation support (initial)

2005-08-11 Thread Mark St.Godard
Ben et al, Just a note, I have checked in some initial Security annotation support and unit tests. (see http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC-4) I will be also checking in a Contacts webapp example, however using Spring @Transaction annotations and the new @Secured