Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion? (Change completed)

2006-04-29 Thread Luke Taylor
Great, that works. I wasn't aware that you can just use the maven2 style names in maven 1. Thanks Carlos. Carlos Sanchez wrote: Have you tried dependency groupIdorg.apache.directory.server/groupId artifactIdapacheds-core/artifactId version1.0-RC1/version

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion? (Change completed)

2006-04-26 Thread Luke Taylor
I would like to, but they don't seem to be visible in the maven 1 repository. If we are upgrading to maven 2 then there shouldn't be a problem with apacheds RC1. Carlos Sanchez wrote: I have committed some changes, now the problems are with ldap dependencies, can somebody check if we can

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion? (Change completed)

2006-04-26 Thread Luke Taylor
:10 PM To: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion? (Change completed) I have committed some changes, now the problems are with ldap dependencies, can somebody check if we can upgrade to a non snapshot dependency? there's alreaddy RC1

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion? (Change completed)

2006-04-26 Thread Carlos Sanchez
www.ibiblio.org/maven is no longer used. Requests for files are converted to the maven2 repo, if it's in www.ibiblio.org/maven2 then is available for maven1 On 4/26/06, Luke Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to, but they don't seem to be visible in the maven 1 repository. If we are

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion? (Change completed)

2006-04-26 Thread Luke Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I could be wrong, but I suspect that most Acegi developers already have these Maven resources in their repositories from other projects (or populate them manually). This is currently the only OSS project I'm involved with, so I'm depending on Maven to fill my

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion? (Change completed)

2006-04-25 Thread Ben Alex
Carlos Sanchez wrote: Looks right, only that https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/acegisecurity/trunk/CVSROOT should be deleted Thanks for the feedback, Carlos. Re CVSROOT, that's an artifact of the cvs2svn process. Even automatically migrated SF repositories (eg Spring Rich Client) have

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion? (Change completed)

2006-04-25 Thread Carlos Sanchez
I have committed some changes, now the problems are with ldap dependencies, can somebody check if we can upgrade to a non snapshot dependency? there's alreaddy RC1 of apache directory in ibiblio. On 4/25/06, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Carlos Sanchez wrote: Looks right, only that

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion? (Change completed)

2006-04-25 Thread scott
\acegisecurity\doc Scott -Original Message- From: Carlos Sanchez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 3:10 PM To: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion? (Change completed) I have committed some changes, now

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion? (Change completed)

2006-04-24 Thread Ben Alex
Ben Alex wrote: Last weekend SF had some CVS issues, so I didn't make the switch as intended. I'm now going to hold-off doing this until early May, because I'm largely on the road until then and don't want to change things and be unavailable if anything goes wrong. Just wanted to let

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion? (Change completed)

2006-04-24 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Looks right, only that https://svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/acegisecurity/trunk/CVSROOT should be deleted On 4/24/06, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ben Alex wrote: Last weekend SF had some CVS issues, so I didn't make the switch as intended. I'm now going to hold-off doing this until

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion?

2006-04-09 Thread Carlos Sanchez
+1 On 3/25/06, Ben Alex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone SourceForge have recently modified their offering so we can migrate to SVN (without losing revision history) - see http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=31070group_id=1#import. I have also been using SVN recently

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion?

2006-04-07 Thread Ben Alex
Ben Alex wrote: Does anyone have any concerns with the project migrating from CVS to SVN? If there aren't any objections, I'll make the change in about a week. Last weekend SF had some CVS issues, so I didn't make the switch as intended. I'm now going to hold-off doing this until early

[Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion?

2006-03-25 Thread Ben Alex
Hi everyone SourceForge have recently modified their offering so we can migrate to SVN (without losing revision history) - see http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=31070group_id=1#import. I have also been using SVN recently and had good results. The Subclipse plugin at Update

RE: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion?

2006-03-25 Thread scott
No concerns here. Scott -Original Message- From: Ben Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 5:43 AM To: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion? Hi everyone SourceForge have recently modified

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion?

2006-03-25 Thread Mark St.Godard
+1 On 3/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No concerns here. Scott -Original Message- From: Ben Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 5:43 AM To: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Acegisecurity-developer

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion?

2006-03-25 Thread Matthew E. Porter
@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion? Hi everyone SourceForge have recently modified their offering so we can migrate to SVN (without losing revision history) - see http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=31070grou p_id=1#import. I have also been using SVN

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion?

2006-03-25 Thread Ray Krueger
] Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 5:43 AM To: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Acegisecurity-developer] Subversion? Hi everyone SourceForge have recently modified their offering so we can migrate to SVN (without losing revision history) - see http