[Acegisecurity-developer] Re: [Springframework-developer] Roadmap towards Aceg Security official 1.0.0 release

2004-12-31 Thread Matt Raible
On Dec 29, 2004, at 8:53 PM, Ben Alex wrote: One issue I'd appreciate some comments on is container adapter deprecation. I know some people use the JBoss container adapter (as they need to use EJB security as well), but I've not heard of any usage of the Resin, Tomcat or Jetty adapters. It

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Reducing the number of filters needed in web.xml

2005-02-20 Thread Matt Raible
This looks very cool - anything to cut down the amount of XML needed for Acegi Security is a good thing IMO. I just finished my chapter on security for Spring Live - do you think I should scrap the old stuff and update it to reflect this new way? If so, when will 0.8.0 (or will be it 1.0) be

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Anonymous principal support now in CVS

2005-02-23 Thread Matt Raible
Is ROLE_ANONYMOUS a special key so that you don't have to add it to your user data store? If it has to be added, do all registered users have to have have this role assigned to them? I'm sure it works how I'd expect it to work, just want to clarify. It would be nice if this was possible:

[Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-09 Thread Matt Raible
With Acegi Security 0.7.0, I was able to use session.invalidate() to logout a user - much like I do when using container-managed authentication. However, with 0.8.0, I've found that I have to use ContextHolder.setContext(null). Is there anyway to change back to the old behavior so I don't

[Acegisecurity-developer] FilterChainProxy and ContextHolderAwareRequestFilter

2005-03-09 Thread Matt Raible
Sorry for all the questions, just want to get all my ducks in a row so AppFuse is using Acegi Security in the recommended fashion. There are two questions below: quote from: 1.15.4. Filter Ordering All of the above filters use |FilterToBeanProxy| or |FilterChainProxy|, which is discussed in the

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-11 Thread Matt Raible
, Andreas Matt Raible wrote: With Acegi Security 0.7.0, I was able to use session.invalidate() to logout a user - much like I do when using container-managed authentication. However, with 0.8.0, I've found that I have to use ContextHolder.setContext(null). Is there anyway to change back

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-11 Thread Matt Raible
On Mar 11, 2005, at 2:17 AM, Ben Alex wrote: Matt Raible wrote: For some reason, calling session.invalidate() (in a filter or in a JSP) doesn't seem to help get rid of any Acegi authentication information. Adding ContextHolder.setContext(null) in a filter that's mapped to logout.jsp seems

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Reference documentation covers v0.7 only?

2005-03-11 Thread Matt Raible
Try http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net/docbook/acegi.html On Mar 11, 2005, at 8:00 AM, Ralph Pöllath wrote: Hi, The reference documentation at http://acegisecurity.sourceforge.net/docbook/index.html seems to cover version 0.7 only. When will it be updated for the recently released version

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-11 Thread Matt Raible
On Mar 11, 2005, at 6:28 AM, Matt Raible wrote: On Mar 11, 2005, at 2:17 AM, Ben Alex wrote: Matt Raible wrote: For some reason, calling session.invalidate() (in a filter or in a JSP) doesn't seem to help get rid of any Acegi authentication information. Adding ContextHolder.setContext(null

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-14 Thread Matt Raible
On Mar 12, 2005, at 6:46 PM, Ben Alex wrote: Matt Raible wrote: Here's a link to AppFuse's applicationContext-security.xml file - the filters are specified in the first bean at the top. http://tinyurl.com/6y4jd Matt, did you get it working in the end? Nope. As the Contacts Sample is working

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-15 Thread Matt Raible
is that session.invalidate() logs out the user, regardless of redirect or not. I tried adding dispatcherREQUEST/dispatcher and dispatcherFORWARD/dispatcher to the Acegi Filter Chain Proxy, but no luck. Still digging... Matt Matt Raible wrote: FYI... I just upgraded the sample app for Spring

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] session.invalidate() vs. ContextHolder.setContext(null)

2005-03-21 Thread Matt Raible
I was able to confirm that the contacts-filter sample works fine. I'm fine with a 0.8.1 since I have workarounds (redirect and ContextHolder.setContext(null)) for both my apps. Matt On Mar 20, 2005, at 3:38 PM, Ben Alex wrote: Matt Raible wrote: Unfortunately, I looked

[Acegisecurity-developer] Integrating ContextHolderAwareRequestFilter into HttpSessionContextIntegrationFilter

2005-04-05 Thread Matt Raible
It seems to me that the ContextHolderAwareRequestFilter should be an enabled filter by default in Acegi - allowing folks to use request.isUserInRole() and many tag libraries with their applications. It seems like it'd be a lot simpler (especially from a configuration perspective) to roll the

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] incorporating Acegi from JSTL/Struts Tags

2005-04-26 Thread Matt Raible
You should be able to use the roles attribute of logic:present if you enable Acegi's ContextHolderAwareRequestFilter (http://tinyurl.com/8knk9). Matt On Apr 26, 2005, at 8:45 AM, Greg Akins wrote: I would like to use Acegi to display a value in a JSP page conditionally. Preferably using

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] incorporating Acegi from JSTL/Struts Tags

2005-04-26 Thread Matt Raible
: Thanks! While I was checking into this I also ran into the authz:authorize tag. Any thoughts on whether it's better to call the roles attribute using logic:present vs relying on the Acegi tag libraries? --- Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You should be able to use the roles attribute

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Preparing for 0.9.0

2005-11-08 Thread Matt Raible
On Nov 3, 2005, at 9:51 AM, Ben Alex wrote: Hi everyone CVS now contains pretty much all the tasks scheduled for 0.9.0. The roadmap is at: http://opensource2.atlassian.com/projects/spring/browse/SEC? report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel I'd be grateful if

[Acegisecurity-developer] Issues with upgrading AppFuse to use Acegi 1.0

2006-06-01 Thread Matt Raible
FYI...I had a couple issues upgrading AppFuse to use Acegi Security 1.0.http://forum.springframework.org/showthread.php?p=63593Because of these issues, it looks like I'll be using RC2 until the next release. Unless there's workarounds of course. ;-) Matt

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] 1.0.1 patch release?

2006-06-10 Thread Matt Raible
On 6/9/06, Luke Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure a release will be possible until Ben gets back from Europe. There are always the nightly builds until then, if people need a quick fix. Isn't it possible for someone else to roll a release? It's probably a good time to contact Ben

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] [Springframework-developer] [ANN] Acegi Security 1.0.3 released

2006-12-01 Thread Matt Raible
property name=filterProcessesUrl value=/logout.jsp/ /bean Any ideas? Matt On 11/28/06, Carlos Sanchez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no time ;) doing it now On 11/28/06, Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any reason why these aren't in the central repo yet? http

[Acegisecurity-developer] OpenID support?

2006-12-29 Thread Matt Raible
Are there any plans to support OpenID as a SSO option with Acegi Security? http://openid.net We've seen some interest in supporting this with Roller - which uses Acegi for its security. Thanks, Matt -- http://raibledesigns.com

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] Maven2 POM for Acegi-Security

2007-02-16 Thread Matt Raible
I'm willing to bet this problem is caused by using the full Spring dependency rather than fine-grained Spring dependencies. I use the full Spring dependency and have experienced this issue as well. It's too bad there's not a way in Maven to say this JAR overrides all others. Here's what I've

Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] OpenID support

2007-03-14 Thread Matt Raible
all start taking a look at it. -Original Message- From: Matt Raible Sent: 08 March 2007 14:20 To: Robin.Bramley Cc: acegisecurity-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Acegisecurity-developer] OpenID support That's great to hear someone is working