Re: Thoughts about unit testing and mock objects

2006-05-13 Thread Martin Marinschek
I do believe as well that jMock doesn't provide enough context for writing proper tests of JSF-behaviour. At leasts whatever tests I have written so far needed some more than just a method to call and the information on whether this method has been called. regards, Martin On 5/13/06, Adam

Re: Thoughts about unit testing and mock objects

2006-05-13 Thread John Fallows
On 5/13/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/12/06, John Fallows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/12/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/12/06, John Fallows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/10/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought more about this

Re: Thoughts about unit testing and mock objects

2006-05-13 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 5/13/06, John Fallows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/13/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/12/06, John Fallows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/12/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/12/06, John Fallows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/10/06, Adam Winer

Re: caching of rowkeys in the table

2006-05-13 Thread Adam Winer
On 5/13/06, John Fallows [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do we have any performance analysis of the impact of these long keys, or do we just intuitively think it's a big deal? For example, what happens when GZIP compression is used to deliver both the initial page and partial responses? We should