Re: [Issue] AFEndPadding appears twice in base-desktop.xss

2006-08-24 Thread Simon Lessard
Good to know, thanks. ~ Simon On 8/23/06, Jeanne Waldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is wanted. The second one is in a different stylesheet: styleSheet direction=rtl - Jeanne Simon Lessard wrote: Hello all, Is that wanted? ~ Simon

Re: ADFFACES-49 inputText::content:required or inputText:required::content

2006-08-24 Thread Simon Lessard
Hello Pavitra, My solution would work with it as it is binary, the pseudo-class either get intercepted or pass through, independently of the enclosing element. For :hover case, it would always go through for Firefox, except if the component said he wanted to intercept that pseudo-class and for

RTL question

2006-08-24 Thread Simon Lessard
Hello all, Can anyone give me a really short course about RTL support we have in Trinidad? Basically, I thought I had to add :rtl to style classes within the renderer and the skin, but that's obviously not the case, :rtl to selectors seems to work only on icons. In the XSS it's 2 different

Re: Custom Skins for Different Form Factors

2006-08-24 Thread Jeanne Waldman
a couple comments inline... Joseph Rozier wrote: Hi, Jeanne, I've got some comments inline... On 8/23/06, Jeanne Waldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Joey, We have simple-desktop and simple-pda skins. You can create a pda or desktop skin by specifying the render-kit-id in your skin. The

Re: RTL question

2006-08-24 Thread Jeanne Waldman
Hi Simon, Appending :rtl should work. There's a chance that this broke recently. I'll have to double check. I'll make this high priority. - Jeanne Simon Lessard wrote: Hello all, Can anyone give me a really short course about RTL support we have in Trinidad? Basically, I thought I had to

Missing Facets on tr:panelPage

2006-08-24 Thread Joseph Rozier
Hello, I've noticed that many panelPage facets do not seem to be supported. I found the following listed in the tr:panelPage tag documentation, but when I put a tr:outputText in them nothing was rendered. A quick search through the renderers show that there is currently no logic to show them.

Re: ADFFACES-49 inputText::content:required or inputText:required::content

2006-08-24 Thread Jeanne Waldman
My opinion is that if you want the same pseudo-class to pass through when in one state and not when in the other state, then I would just not have it pass through in either case, and handle it yourself. - Jeanne Simon Lessard wrote: Hello Pavitra, My solution would work with it as it is

Re: RTL question

2006-08-24 Thread Jeanne Waldman
I tried this and it works for me. There is a demo of it in the purple skin's css file. af|inputText::content:rtl { color: red; } If you set the browser to be a rtl language and run the inputText demo, you'll see the content's text is red. - Jeanne Jeanne Waldman wrote: Hi Simon,

Re: ADFFACES-60

2006-08-24 Thread Simon Lessard
Hello Pavitra, Yes it explain much, especially for overflows. However, I meant something slightly different about visited/unvisited. Imagine the max visited mode. The user do the following on a 5 steps train: step 1 -- step 2 -- step 3 -- step 2. Now is step 3 visited or unvisited? I would tend

RE: ADFFACES-60

2006-08-24 Thread Pavitra Subramaniam
To answer your question, Do we consider a station unvisited if it come after the active station or simply if the user never visited it? The former seems more common as well as easier to implements. - A stop is unvisited (and clickable) if it comes after an active stop, only if it's not

Re: RTL question

2006-08-24 Thread Simon Lessard
Hmmm, here is what get generated i nthe CSS for me with the new panelBox; .af_panelBox_dark .af_panelBox_content, .x4k .x4v, .af_panelBox_dark.p_AFRtl .af_panelBox_content, .x4k.p_AFRtl .x4v {padding-top:8px} .af_panelBox_dark .af_panelBox_header, .x4k .x4u, .af_panelBox_dark.p_AFRtl

RE: ADFFACES-60

2006-08-24 Thread Pavitra Subramaniam
Comments below.. - Pavitra -Original Message- From: Simon Lessard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 1:08 PM To: adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ADFFACES-60 Hello Pavitra, Yes it explain much, especially for

Re: ADFFACES-49 inputText::content:required or inputText:required::content

2006-08-24 Thread Jeanne Waldman
I wasn't really suggesting anything. By the way, in case you didn't notice, Adam made a change yesterday so that ALL pseudo-classes get transformed to .p_AF*, except for the css-2 pseudo-classes, which pass through. This simple change buys us a lot. It satisfies my immediate need for a

RE: ADFFACES-60

2006-08-24 Thread Pavitra Subramaniam
Hello Simon, Yeah. It's a littlehokey,but there is code in _getTrainState that does something like below. So train.maxVisitedIndex is always set to the right value. // get highest node in train visited train.maxVisitedIndex = _getMaxVisitedIndex(); // default to selectedIndex if it wasn't

RE: ADFFACES-60

2006-08-24 Thread Pavitra Subramaniam
Whoa! I don't know what happened there, but my email was all garbled. Resending - Hello Simon, Yeah. It's a little hokey, but there is code in _getTrainState that does something like below. So train.maxVisitedIndex is always set to the right value. // get highest node in train

Issues using Trinidad, ADF tomahawk

2006-08-24 Thread Thomas Spiegl
I started to work on Trinidad and tomahawk incompatibilities. Problem #1 (fixed partly) When using the ADF form, tomahawk links won't work. The reason for this: Tomahawk links are bound to the MyFaces form component. This problem I could partly solve. I started off using an environment, which

Re: Issues using Trinidad, ADF tomahawk

2006-08-24 Thread Adam Winer
Problem #2 should not be happening if the MyFaces state management code is properly factored; the FormRenderer - anyone's form renderer - should be calling the ResponseStateManager, which should be rendering the sequence. Last time I looked, the MyFaces FormRenderer was directly encoding the

Re: [plugins] rc/snapshot for testing

2006-08-24 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
I patched the branch yesterday evening to fix ADFFACES-150 On 8/24/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so far, we got 3x binding +1 (Adam, Bruno and me) 1 non-binding +1 (Simon) time to move forward! I created a wiki page for the reflection of this upcoming release On 8/15/06,

Re: [plugins] rc/snapshot for testing

2006-08-24 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/ADF_Faces/plugins_release_candidate_m1 On 8/24/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so far, we got 3x binding +1 (Adam, Bruno and me) 1 non-binding +1 (Simon) time to move forward! I created a wiki page for the reflection of this upcoming release