I totally agree with what Mike says here, and I do think that not only
Oracle will profit of once-monthly stable branches.
If there is something to say against a specific branch, we'll discuss
it on the list, and we'll certainly find a solution.
regards,
Martin
On 8/15/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL
I was going to add something in here about so long as the community
agrees, but my 1-year-old smacked my keyboard and sent the message
:-)
On 8/15/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As the saying goes, it's individuals not corporations that drive
projects at the ASF, and if you, as
Hey all,
For some of our internal, non-open source work here at Oracle,
we're heavily depending on Trinidad (yay!). The catch is that,
at certain points, we need a stable branch to build off of and
apply only limited bug fixes so that internal work never gets
destabilized.
What I'd like to do
I think basicly that what you want is something like:
a branch for a release or a rc, which is also maintained.
I think that's fine with Apache, why not?
In MyFaces we do a branch for *each* release too, but we are
not maintaining the branches *after* the release (which is bad).
So the work
In general, yes, we just have a public branch for a
release which continues to be maintained, which
is a good thing.
My concern is that, in this case, the one calling
for the branch is not the Trinidad/MyFaces community,
but a specific company. Ideally, the two match up
and agree, in which case
basicly I think this discussion is out of scope
for this community. It's more a *general* thing.
Currently there are some more donations by companies
(like XFire from Iona). I am not sure how they deal with that.
When they (Iona or sb. else) needs a special branch.
I am also not sure, what
I am also not sure, what Mergere does, when they want something special?
I am refering to the maven development.
Maybe should post this on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list ?
On 8/14/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In general, yes, we just have a public branch for a
release which
On 8/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
For some of our internal, non-open source work here at Oracle,
we're heavily depending on Trinidad (yay!). The catch is that,
at certain points, we need a stable branch to
On 8/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
For some of our internal, non-open source work here at Oracle,
we're heavily depending on Trinidad (yay!). The catch
The simplest answer is to come up with something that is
not company-specific, so it doesn't get Apache into non-profit
legal trouble, yet addresses these real needs. How about
a basic monthly stabilization branch that anyone can pull
off of, and has no particular tie to any one company? And
a
On 8/14/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
For some of our internal, non-open source work here at
11 matches
Mail list logo
