Re: [Demo] dependency to mail / activation

2006-05-03 Thread Craig McClanahan
On 5/3/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 5/3/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: having dependency on these should be fine IMHO (regarding licensing), since some ASF projects depend on JavaMail as well ([1] and [2]) -Matthias [1]

Re: [Demo] dependency to mail / activation

2006-05-03 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On 5/3/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just because some projects are doing it now doesn't mean it's ok. I'd recommend looking at this document for all of your licensing questions: http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html keep in mind, that this is *only* a draft yet!

Re: [Demo] dependency to mail / activation

2006-05-03 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On 5/3/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: keep in mind, that this is *only* a draft yet! That was discussed on legal-discuss list at ASF While it's true that it's only a draft, it's a draft on the verge of being official policy. In fact, I expected to see an announcement on it