Re: Weblogic

2006-07-21 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
Since I am not using Weblogic, I asked here for help. So, maybe you can *investigate* on that ? :) -Matt On 7/21/06, Cosma Colanicchia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is a big one, at least for us :) Cosma 2006/7/20, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hey folks, anyone knows more on

Re: Weblogic

2006-07-21 Thread Cosma Colanicchia
I'd like to... the only problem is that I will be switching to another project for some time starting from next week, so I don't know when I will have the chance. I'll try to take a look to it today, if I can. Cosma 2006/7/21, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Since I am not using

Re: Weblogic

2006-07-21 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
You are welcome, thanks On 7/21/06, Cosma Colanicchia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to... the only problem is that I will be switching to another project for some time starting from next week, so I don't know when I will have the chance. I'll try to take a look to it today, if I can.

Re: Weblogic

2006-07-21 Thread Cosma Colanicchia
Hi Matthias, sorry but I had not enough time this morning, and now I will busy for some days. To cite Mario: You know, sometimes your customer disturbs you in your creative process and would like to have something you get paid for ;-) Hope I'll have a chance to return on this issue soon. Cosma

Re: Weblogic

2006-07-21 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
That sounds fine, I smiled too, when reading that phrase from Mario -Matthias On 7/21/06, Cosma Colanicchia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Matthias, sorry but I had not enough time this morning, and now I will busy for some days. To cite Mario: You know, sometimes your customer disturbs you in

Re: Subversion properties

2006-07-21 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
+1 On 7/21/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This would be excellent. FYI, the inconsistent line feeds are 100% my fault; they happened when I put in the new licenses. -- Adam On 7/20/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Since it sounds like you're going to start the adf -

Re: Re: [Proposal] (re)naming issue

2006-07-21 Thread Matthias Wessendorf
On 7/20/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For class names, I'm thinking that: AdfFacesContext - RequestContext, or maybe LifecycleContext AdfRenderingContext - RenderingContext (the latter is currently a private-ish internal class, but I think we should make it public at some point.)