+1 (non-binding)
On 8/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for the later
On 8/4/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question:
Are we better off with the current structure:
trunk/plugins
/trinidad
branches/
or with:
plugins/trunk
/branches
Hello,
+1 for the latter as well.
Simon Lessard
Fujitsu Consulting
Matt Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2006-08-08 04:43
Please respond to adffaces-dev
To: adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc:
Subject:Re: SVN structure
+1 (non-binding)
On 8/5/06
+1 for the later
On 8/4/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question:
Are we better off with the current structure:
trunk/plugins
/trinidad
branches/
or with:
plugins/trunk
/branches
trinidad/trunk
/branches
I think the latter is more natural if the plugins
