, converters,
validators, where we're trying to test if our components are
correctly calling these objects.
-- Adam
On 7/4/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey devs,
today I committed some stuff I did on the mock overhaul bransch.
These things work out of the box with shale-test 1.0.2
).
I'm happy with using jmock for objects like listeners, converters,
validators, where we're trying to test if our components are
correctly calling these objects.
-- Adam
On 7/4/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey devs,
today I committed some stuff I did on the mock overhaul
, where we're trying to test if our components are
correctly calling these objects.
-- Adam
On 7/4/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey devs,
today I committed some stuff I did on the mock overhaul bransch.
These things work out of the box with shale-test 1.0.2;
(still
,
validators, where we're trying to test if our components are
correctly calling these objects.
-- Adam
On 7/4/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey devs,
today I committed some stuff I did on the mock overhaul bransch.
These things work out of the box with shale-test
are
correctly calling these objects.
-- Adam
On 7/4/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey devs,
today I committed some stuff I did on the mock overhaul bransch.
These things work out of the box with shale-test 1.0.2;
(still some clean ups needed)
Now
we're trying to test if our components are
correctly calling these objects.
-- Adam
On 7/4/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey devs,
today I committed some stuff I did on the mock overhaul bransch.
These things work out of the box
Hey devs,
today I committed some stuff I did on the mock overhaul bransch.
These things work out of the box with shale-test 1.0.2;
(still some clean ups needed)
Now, I *must* uses 1.0.3-SNAPSHOT (only on my box), b/c of a fixed
bug in shale.
However, I am also at that stage, where I need more
