Hi all,
do anybody have any experience with connecting Sun Storedge L180 library (up
to 10 drives, up to 180 slots) with LTO drives to W2K box (one of our
customers wants it so)? I checked TSM device support list and this library
is supported for W2K TSM server from 4.2.0 version for all TSM
I have db volumes on netapp filer on NFS .And when ever disk is
accessed I see 99% wait on DISK FOR cpu?
We see a very similar problem. We have a storage pool on NetApp, and
whenever we migrate, we get huge wait times. It's caused by paging and is
an AIX problem, which pages out computational
On Tuesday, Apr 1, 2003, at 16:47 Australia/Sydney, PAC Brion Arnaud
wrote:
Richard,
That would make sense, if the job was freezing in the middle of the
copies, but apparently, it just waits a while before starting to write
the first bit of data to tape, and then goes fine till the end !
Thanks
I've had that same problem. We tracked it down to a firewall that was rejecting the
TSM client. Has anything changed on your
network?
sal
Vital Data Systems, LLC
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Monday,
Richard,
That would make sense, if the job was freezing in the middle of the
copies, but apparently, it just waits a while before starting to write
the first bit of data to tape, and then goes fine till the end !
Then that speaks to a defective tape (or even drive) problem, as I
suggested. That
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 07:16 pm, it was written:
You could try running monthly incrementals under a
different nodename (ie: create another dsm.opt file
eg: dsmmthly.opt) to your TSM (same or even dedicated)
server.
BTW, running monthly incrementals will not facilitate your long-term
storage nearly as
TSM 4.1.6 on Solaris 8 I added to many mgsyslan.lic licenses and now I would like to
reduce it. I looked in the Ref and Admin guide and found no REM or DEL lic, there's
reference to the Nodelock file, but not sire if I could blow it a way and re-register?
Fat fingers in the Morning
On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 06:07:46PM +0200, PAC Brion Arnaud wrote:
Could anybody explain me why I consistently see backup stg jobs freezing ? What
happens is that the job begins, but thereafter hangs for a while, doing nothing at
all, and suddenly starts copying data on tape. I saw this
Richard, Paul,
Thanks for the tips, I'll kep an eye on my tape drives, and on DB disk
activity !
Emil,
For big storage pools that can take quite some time, and especially if
running at the same time as expiration or other DB heavy activity.
In my case, the storage pool size is approximatively
Charles,
If you register the wrong license or too many license.
There is not a remove or a delete license command.
If you want to see this feature in future release of TSM, need
to call IBM TSM Support and submit a design change request.
To change the license.
Need to locate the nodelock file.
Hello,
I hope someone can help me?
We have made a web page for our users which should point them to the latest
TSM client code either on ftp.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de or in Boulder. However,
there ist a problem. The code can be found in different trees: either under
maintenance or under patches. To me
Hi
There shouldn't be a problem to direct them to the patch location. I
haven't found any problems only installing the patch version of the
client.
When it comes to servers and TDP, it's a whole different story. In theese
cases you will need both maintenance level and patch.
Best Regards
I just migrated our TSM system to a new pSeries 6H1 from our old F50.
While I/O throughput is much higher, the database performance is
surprisingly poor. I am asking for help in trying to figure out why and
what I can do about it.
TSM 4.1.5.0 running on AIX 4.3.3 ML 10
6H1 2-way 600 MHz 64-bit
4
Thanks, that's what I was afraid of.
Regards,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Sias Dealy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Dumb License Question
Charles,
If you register the wrong license or too many license.
There is
In our experience out DB performs much faster on RAW Disk volumes as opposed to JFS
filesystems. If you got to RAW for the DB and Logs make sure the Log vol RAW disk is
not larger than the 4.5 / 5.2 Log limit of TSM 4.1.x
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Tab Trepagnier [mailto:[EMAIL
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 16:14:48 +0200
Daniel Sparrman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
There shouldn't be a problem to direct them to the patch location. I
haven't found any problems only installing the patch version of the
client.
Unless you are one of the lucky few where the maintenance
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 08:46:56 -0600
Tab Trepagnier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I built the new server, I took advantage of info on this forum and
created a single large DB volume on each DB disk. The DB is currently
laid out this way:
== So what should I do? Split the database into a few
I've found that you can indeed delete licenses by setting the number
of licenses to zero (I think you must be fairly current with your
server, mine are at v5.1.6.3):
register license file=./library.lic number=0
removes all of the library entries. Similarly,
register license file=./mgsyslan.lic
You didn't mention what kind of disk (or array)
you have?
David Longo
David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH 321.434.5536
Pager 321.634.8230
Fax:321.434.5509
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/01/03 09:51 AM
I just
I am trying to speed up the time required to backup our primary tape
stgpool to our secondary site by changing the number of process allowed.
When I changed MAXPROCESS=2, it kicked off 2 Backup Storage Pool
processes which is what I expected but on the secondary system, the 2
sessions are both
Thank you, logic makes sense...
On TSM 4.1.x it does not work but tested it on 5.1.5 and it works! I will have to do
the Nodelock option for that server.
Have a great Day!
-Original Message-
From: Gretchen L. Thiele [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:25 AM
To:
Thanks a million Rich I will work on this .
Balanand Pinni
-Original Message-
From: Richard Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 2:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I/O wait on NFS very high.--Help.
I have db volumes on netapp filer on NFS .And when
I am moving some nodes to a new storagepool, from a non-colocated one to
a colocated one. I updated the copygroup definition to point to the new
storagepool and new backups are going there. I used move nodedata to
move the old data from its primary tape pool to the new one. My regular
backup
Hello everyone!
Just recently upgraded TSM server from 4.1.5 to 5.1.6.2 and I am seeing the
output on the web admin gui differently. Is there a fix for this that
anyone is aware of?If you notice the new version has ~ and / in the
output. Thanks!
This is the old web admin gui output 4.1.5:
This is a known problem. I do not think a fix has been released yet.
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/01/03 11:10 AM
Hello everyone!
Just recently upgraded TSM server from 4.1.5 to 5.1.6.2 and I am seeing
the
output on the web admin gui differently. Is there a fix for this that
anyone is aware
Spreading the I/O among several disks is preferred as it increase the
throughput. As RAID 0,1 is prefered to RAID 5 as each write is faster.
This of course is more expensive.
Thanks Regards
William
|-+--
| | David Longo|
|
Hi guys!
I'm using TSM 5.1.6.3 on Linux...
When i perform a query db i have the following output:
Available Assigned Maximum MaximumPage Total Used Pct Max.
Space Capacity Extension ReductionSizeUsable Pages Util Pct
(MB) (MB) (MB) (MB)
SQL Version 7
TDP Version 2.2.1
Trying to restore SQL Database onto another SQL Server but I am getting this
error
ACO0151E
Restore failed [Microsoft] ODBC SQL Server Driver...The file cannot be used
by RESTORE..Consider using With MOVE Option to identify a valid Location.
What am I doing
Hi TSM´s genius:
Does an ADSM-HSM client version 3.1.20, running in an AIX 4.3.3, works with
a TSM server version 5.1.5 ?
We want migrate TSM server 4.1 to TSM server 5.1.5, but we cant migrate the
HSM client because it support an Ondemand 2.1 with many scripts and so
on
We are planning a
Mehdi,
Look at the /RELOCATE and /TO options.
(... or the right-mouse click while the
backup to restore is selected.)
This allows you to move the database
to a different physical location.
Thanks,
Del
SQL Version 7
TDP Version 2.2.1
Since My email, I did exactly as you recommed and it worked.
THanks so much
Mehdi Amini
LAN/WAN Engineer
ValueOptions
12369 Sunrise Valley Drive
Suite C
Reston, VA 20191
Phone: 703-390-6855
Fax: 703-390-2581
-Original Message-
From: Del Hoobler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
Rich
I applied fix IY34604 and things have improved ,but IO still has
considerable wait time!!!
Any more ideas please!!!
0 1 164178 72160 0 0 0 00 0 2499 5071 679 1 4 46 49
0 1 164178 71136 0 0 0 00 0 3295 4808 703 1 4 48 46
thr memory page
Thanks to all who responded.
The problem turned out to be a DB Buffer Pool that was just too small,
despite the fact that the old system gave acceptable performance with
half as much.
Since with TSM 4+ the DB Buffer Pool can be updated dynamically, I
increased it 128 MB at a step and watched to
Hello,
TSM AIX client 5.1, 64 bit, TDP 5.1.5
I'm new to TDP for Oracle. I download the Redbook but it is, as far as I can
see, outdated. Is there somebody outthere who like to share his experience
in installing and configuring TDP for Oracle with me or can but me to a more
recent manual.
Thanx
I just installed the TSM client on a AIX 5.2 client, registered the node
and started and incremental. This node is runnig a 64 bit kernal but I
installed the 32 bit client. Ican ping the TSM server from the node, and
the node from the TSM server. However, I keep getting:
[tk2dbms] /home/root #
I applied fix IY34604 and things have improved ,but IO
still has considerable wait time!!!
Any more ideas please!!!
Sorry, none to be had. You're now ahead of us, because we run AIX 4.3.3 and
we're still waiting for our fix.
Maybe you could keep the list posted with your results, as I am
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 2:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: I/O wait on NFS very high.--Help.
I applied fix IY34604 and things have improved ,but IO
still has considerable wait time!!!
Any more
Which brings up another general question I have been
thinking about posing for some time.
With TSM the basic disk tuning theory, in a sentence,
for some years has been spread DB, LOG and Disk Pool
out over as many separate disks/spindles as possible.
Well as we are now getting 73 and 144GB
With TSM the basic disk tuning theory, in a sentence,
66or some years has been spread DB, LOG and Disk Pool
out over as many separate disks/spindles as possible.
Well as we are now getting 73 and 144GB disks,
and who knows what's next, then how are we TSM
Admins supposed to do that?
Buy disks
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 16:04:19 -0500
David Longo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Which brings up another general question I have been
thinking about posing for some time.
With TSM the basic disk tuning theory, in a sentence,
for some years has been spread DB, LOG and Disk Pool
out over as many
do you have enough scrach tape assigned to the tape pool?
-Original Message-
From: John C Dury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 4/1/2003 10:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: problem with backup stgpool and maxprocess=2
At 10:28 AM -0500 4/1/03, John C Dury wrote:
When I changed MAXPROCESS=2, it kicked off 2 Backup Storage Pool
processes which is what I expected but on the secondary system, the 2
sessions are both asking for the same volume to be mounted so only one is
actually writing data and the other is just
This is a zOS TSM 4.2.3.2 server. The client server is AIX 4.3 with TSM
client 4.2.3.0
We had a recent hardware failure/disaster which resulted in a complete
wipe of 250GB+ of storage on an AIX 4.3 system. To complicate matters,
this is one of our email system, with 22-MILLION files comprising
What can I look at to do anything I can to speed things up ?
Zoltan - Your posting mentions checking some sources regarding the issue;
if you haven't already, see if factors listed under
Restoral Performance in http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts
I'd recommend doing a
From: jiangguohong1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
now i just receive a request to config STK L700 tape library
with tsm 5.1. i see a great deal of document,they say that
need to config ACSLS and third party software Gresham
EDT-DistribuTAPE software.so i have two probelem as
following: i
From: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am moving some nodes to a new storagepool, from a
non-colocated one to a colocated one. I updated the
copygroup definition to point to the new storagepool and new
backups are going there. I used move nodedata to move the
old data from
Zoltan,
You've probably tried this already, but just in case...have you cranked up
resourceutilization and maxnummp?
Maybe no-query restores?
Just a thought...
-Lloyd
On Tue, 1 Apr 2003 17:45:46 -0500
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a zOS TSM 4.2.3.2 server. The
As big a fan of backupsets as I am, I feel the need to point out the
disadvantage of backupsets: you can't browse through them if you don't
the name of a desired file or its directory location. You can run Q
BACKUPSETCONTENTS, but then you'll have to grep through a *very* long
output.
In
No, we havent. I looked at these parameters and they might just help,
since it is only single-threading right now.
Thanks for the tips !
Lloyd Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
04/01/2003 06:11 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Mark,
I have two objections to backupsets. The first is that API data is not covered. The
second is that you are not supposed to make new backups for a node whilst the
backupset is being created - this could cause horrendous scheduling difficulties in my
environment.
Is this second
If you use migproc=2 when you dump your diskpool then that will write two two tapes,
which will then get used in parallel by backup stg.
Steve.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/04/2003 8:04:10
At 10:28 AM -0500 4/1/03, John C Dury wrote:
When I changed MAXPROCESS=2, it kicked off 2 Backup Storage Pool
FYI, FWIW, the option of multiple-restore streams was introduced with the
5.x client. While this machine is still using 4.2.3.0, we are going to
investigate upgrading to 5.1.5.x Not sure why this client wasn't
upgraded.
Any specifics on how to do the no query restore ? We checked the book
and
Hello TSM-ers,
two or three weeks ago I asked list to help me with Domino backup. The
problem was that, when I used TDP GUI or command line for backup
I always got couple of the following error messages for various databases:
04/02/2003 08:38:53 Backup of admin4.nsf failed.
04/02/2003 08:38:53
hi Lawrence Clark,
Check for correct path specified for dsm.opt
dsmcutil query /name:tsmservicename
or
dsmc q se -optfile=optfilename
I hope this will helps you,
thanks,
C.R.Chandrasekhar.
Systems Executive.
Tivoli Certified Consultant (TSM).
TIMKEN Engineering Research - INDIA (P) Ltd.,
Hi,
I used STKL700 6xLTO on Win2K and TSM 4.2. It works fine. Use the TSM device
driver, disable win2k driver. One SCSI HVD Channel per drive.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Tom Hrouda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sun
55 matches
Mail list logo
