Hi people
We currently use TSM BAClient 5.2.2 to backup our windows portion
of a server and TDP for Domino to back up domino/notes related files.
We run a daily incremental backup for the windows portion which takes its
options from a client options set. The backup seems to fail however
...
ANS1435E - Error occurred saving the key
...
Check out the possibility which IBM poses for that msg on its website.
Richard Sims http://people.bu.edu/rbs
Thanks, have looked at the quickfacts and found the apparent cause of the
problem.
Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
23/08/2004 12:08
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re:
Del,
Thanks for your help. I have managed to sort it out,
my changing the value of TRANSLOG_PATH in
NOTES.INI.
Thanks Again
Bill
Del Hoobler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
20/08/2004 15:26
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To:
Hi:
Anyone gone through the 5.1 to 5.1 upgrade on AIX
- did you do an audit db fix=yes prior
- was it basicly a install of the new release with the database being
updated when the server comes up?
- anything else required?
Larry Clark
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lawrence Clark
Anyone gone through the 5.1 to 5.1 upgrade on AIX
Er...you wanna rephrase that, I think.
--
Mark Stapleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Berbee Information Networks
Office 262.521.5627
Is anyone using TSM Server v5.2.3 (AIX platform)? I'm upgrading from
TSM server5.1.1.6 and am wondering if any bugs have been found with this
version since it's so new.
Have anyone else seen somthing like this?
I found the messages on all TSM servers running 5.2.2.4 on IBM Z/OS 1.4 several times.
Sometimes was an TSM server restart needed. The server answer will be very slowly.
Thanks
Joachim
Date/Time Message
Hello All!
I was just wondering if there is any way to change the owner of all files
that have been archived? For example, if the files in question were
archived by user1 and now they are being archived by user2 and retrieved by
user2, is there an easy way to change the owner from user1 to
Patricia,
I've got a customer running 5.2.3.2 on AIX 5.1 ML4 and we've seen so far a
couple of strange TSM crashes and when the customer uses his ODBC coupling
then TSM goes haywire (100% CPU usage).
So my advice, goto 5.2.2 and wait for the next patch version of 5.2.3 and
see what has been
I don't think you can change the ownership. However, you can grant one
node access to another's data? Would this accomplish what you are trying
to do? In the TSM GUI, look under the utilities menu, for the Node Access
List interface.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joni Moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:
I've got a netware server that crashed last week due to raid controller
failure, and had to be rebuilt. After restoring, there are a few
directories that don't have any data in them. When I looked at the
webclient, it didn't show any data had ever been backed up from those
directories. The
TSMManager should also do the trickhttp://www.tsmmanager.com
I think there is a free-trial !
David E Ehresman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/20/2004 08:13 AM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
are the missed files bigger than 4GB?
regards
Joachim
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von
Troy Frank
Gesendet: Montag, 23. August 2004 16:16
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Netware restore problem
I've got a netware server that
No, they're all under 4GB.
Troy Frank
Network Services
University of Wisconsin Medical Foundation
608.829.5384
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/23/2004 9:54:01 AM
are the missed files bigger than 4GB?
regards
Joachim
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL
We are currently running TSM server 5.2.3.1 on AIX. I am currious as to what most
people have the following server options set on there AIX servers. We currently have
the following set on our server:
MirrorRead DBNormal
MirrorWrite DBSequential
MirrorRead LOG Normal
Fellow TSM users:
We are currently running TSM server 5.2.3.1 on AIX. I am currious as to what most
people have the following server options set on there AIX servers. We currently have
the following set on our server:
MirrorRead DBNormal
MirrorWrite DBSequential
MirrorRead
Hello all,
One of our Novell clients recently upgraded the
tsa, smdr and tsands to the following.
tsa500 v5.05h
tsands v10551.443
smdr - v6.54
Yet I'm still seeing the following on the same node it
occasionally happens on another node. I know I have read
that SP7 and Novell patches may fix
Hello,
I could confirm the ODBC problem.
I tried this from a 5.2.3.0 Win32 ODBC client to a 5.2.3.2 AIX server.
Access 2003 on Windows is hanging and the TSM server is on 100%...
Bye
Rainer Tammer
Richard van Denzel wrote:
Patricia,
I've got a customer running 5.2.3.2 on AIX 5.1 ML4 and we've
Hi,
I'm setting up my include/exclude statements dsm.sys file on all my AIX
servers, and I'm running into problem with the excludes. I want to exclude
the following filesystems :
/
/usr
/var
/tmp
I'm using the following statements in my dsm.sys :
exclude.dir /
exclude.dir /usr
exclude.dir /var
Should be exclude.fs
-
Bruce Kamp
Senior Server Analyst
Memorial Healthcare System
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: (954) 987-2020 x4597
Pager: (954) 286-9441
Alphapage: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fax: (954) 985-1404
Hello
I need advise/help/reference for installing TSM server at Sun Solaris 9 + ADIC
library 2000I ..
The library is FC with IBM LTO-2 Drives .
The HBA card will be Emulex 9200x .
Please advice .
Thanks
BB
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm setting up my include/exclude statements dsm.sys file on all my AIX
servers, and I'm running into problem with the excludes. I want to =
exclude
the following filesystems :
/
/usr
/var
/tmp
I'm using the following statements in my dsm.sys :
exclude.dir /
exclude.dir /usr
exclude.dir /var
Hi Rich
Instead of using exclude.dir /var
tryexclude.FS /var *
FS for file system
good luck
Luc
Richard Mochnaczewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2004-08-23 11:54 AM
Please respond to
Thanks, the exclude.fs worked.
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Luc Beaudoin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: include/exclude statements
Hi Rich
Instead of using exclude.dir /var
tryexclude.FS
More than likely there's some small difference between this server, and
the others. With all the different individual, and consolidated patches
that netware has, it doesn't take much for one nlm to be a different
version than the other servers. Backup problems aren't always directly
caused by
I am trying to run an image backup of an USB hard drive and I am receiving
error ANS1067E-Error in system call. I looked at the documentation and it is
not very helpful. Does anyone know what causes that error and how it can be
resolved? I am able to run a file backup on this drive but not an
We have 2 3494 tape libraries. One is local and the other is remote.
The local one (3494LOCAL) receives all the data from the nightly backups as
it gets migrated from disk. The remote one (3494REMOTE) is only used as the
target of backing up the 3494LOCAL storage pool which gets done
Collocation on the local storagepools and not-collocation on the remote
ones?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/23/2004 1:26:57 PM
We have 2 3494 tape libraries. One is local and the other is
remote.
The local one (3494LOCAL) receives all the data from the nightly
backups as
it gets migrated from disk.
Collocation is on for both the 3494LOCAL and the 3494REMOTE tape libraries.
Sorry. I meant to include that in the original posting.
J.
Collocation on the local storagepools and not-collocation on the remote
ones?
jdury AT DUQLIGHT DOT COM 8/23/2004 1:26:57 PM
We have 2 3494 tape
Is compression being used offsite not onsite?
Ryan Miller
Principal Financial Group
Tivoli Certified Consultant
Tivoli Storage Manager v4.1
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
John C Dury
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 12:27 PM
To:
Do you backup your database to the remote library? I take it you aren't
using DRM since you never need to take the tapes out of the library. If
you aren't using DRM, you have to manually delete your volume history for
DB backups. Could be it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Miller, Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ackerman, David
I am trying to run an image backup of an USB hard drive and I
am receiving error ANS1067E-Error in system call. I looked at
the documentation and it is not very helpful. Does anyone know
what causes that error
The output from select
stgpool_name,sum(num_files),sum(logical_mb),sum(physical_mb) from
occupancy group by stgpool_name should give some indication of whether
the same amount of stuff is getting to the remote storagepools.
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/23/2004 1:26:57 PM
We have 2 3494 tape
Electronic Licensing - A key file that is on the CD, but not located on any
download sites. Thus you must have the CD loaded in most cases before
being able to use the downloaded filesets.
Owings, Don
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL
Here is the output from that command. It looks pretty similar to me. I also
checked compression for both local and remote libraries. All are on. We
also run a job every night that deletes the dbb volhistory which allows
only 2 days of retention. (del volhist type=dbb todate=today-2)
Here is the output from that command. Looks pretty close on both.
DEVCLASS_NAME GB/Tape
-- ---
3494CLASS1 40.35
3494CLASS2 40.58
Sigh,
John
So you have about 2 gig of data that hasn't migrated over. Seems
reasonable.
The following
We are preparing to migrate our TSM server from z/OS to mainframe Linux.
Both old and new servers will use a 3494 tape library. The z/OS server
relies on z/OS to handle tape library management. As a result, it does
not have a 'checkout libvol' command, or a 'remove' option for 'move
drmedia'.
The
...
My problem is that 3494LOCAL has 62 scratch tapes available and
3494REMOTE has 207 scratch tapes in it. ...
Hmmm... That's about 3:1, something of a magic ratio in tape drive
settings. Might it be the case that one tape devclass has compression
defined and the other not? This would account
Yes, both checkout and move drmedia move one tape at a time and wait for
it to complete before moving on to the next. TSM does not queue up the
ejects on the 3494 the way MVS does.
If you're doing a lot more than 30 ejects at one time, you might want
to consider defining a bulk I/O wall in your
How about a difference in reuse delay between the two pools?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/23/2004 3:02:26 PM
Here is the output from that command. Looks pretty close on both.
DEVCLASS_NAME GB/Tape
-- ---
3494CLASS1 40.35
3494CLASS2 40.58
tsm: ULTSMselect stgpool_name,status,count(*) from volumes group by
stgpool_nam
e,status
will tell you if you have a difference in pending tapes.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/23/2004 3:02:26 PM
Here is the output from that command. Looks pretty close on both.
DEVCLASS_NAME GB/Tape
Thanks to all who offered help here. The solution turned out to be
straightforward as well as embarrassing. There was nothing wrong with the
configuration or the fact that TSM was running under an ID other than
root. All the volumes had been entered into the library correctly and
checked in
While we're on the topic of INCLUDES, what's wrong with the last
three? It's a SUN box.
EXclude /cdrom/.../*
EXclude /var/run/.../*
EXclude /var/tmp/.../*
EXclude /tmp/.../*
INclude /opt/CThourly/db/.../* HOURLY
INclude /opt/CTweekly/db/.../* EACHWEEK
INclude /opt/CTmonthly/db/.../* EACHMONTH
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David E Ehresman
tsm: ULTSMselect stgpool_name,status,count(*) from volumes
group by stgpool_nam e,status
will tell you if you have a difference in pending tapes.
IIRC, one of the tape pools in question is a primary pool. The
We are running TSM server on AIX version 5.2, the client is running NT
(Bversion 5.2.2 and the USB drive is a Maxtor external USB hard drive
(B
(B-Original Message-
(BFrom: Stapleton, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(BSent: Monday, August 23, 2004 2:00 PM
(BTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone run into similar issues with TSM 5.2.2.3?
HOST OS: AIX 5.2
TSM Level: 5.2.2.3
Server: RS/6000 P-630 dual CPU 12GB RAM
Two TSM instances running. The system is not LPAR.
One library manager, one client. Library sharing through TSM.
Library: 3494 with 8 3590 drives, direct connect SCSI.
The pending status is only relevant for copy pools.
On my TSM 5.1.6.3 running on AIX 5.1:
My primary tape storage pools have a reuse delay:
tsm: ULTSMq stgpool oth-atl f=d
Storage Pool Name: OTH-ATL
Storage Pool Type: Primary
Device Class Name: ATL
When it happened to me on AIX 5.1, TSM 5.1 it was a TCPIP Receive Buffer
error.
(echo ;date; netstat -v ent1 | grep Receive Pool Buffer )
where ent1 is your ethernet interface will tell you if you have receive
buffer errors. No Receive Pool Buffer Errors: should be zero. If
not, you need
Je serai absent(e) du 23.08.2004 au 25.08.2004.
Je répondrai à votre message dès mon retour. Voir avec GAD si besoin.Merci.
HI
We have ibm lto3583 library attached to Sun Solaris box 5.8. tapeutil
function is not working
How can we define library and tape drives without element number?
Pls let us know
Thanks
---
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender
We have ibm lto3583 library attached to Sun Solaris box 5.8. tapeutil
function is not working
Detail, please...?
How can we define library and tape drives without element number?
Don't do that - refer to the provided IBM publications.
The IBM TotalStorage Ultrium Scalable Tape Library 3583
52 matches
Mail list logo
