Hello,
we want to install sysback on systems where already installed tdp for
oracle and tsm 64-bit api.
Sysback needs the tsm 32-bit tsm api.
Should I deinstall the 64-bit tsm api and install the 32-bit tsm api
(performance of tdp for oracle ?),
or can I install both (32-bit and 64-bit tsm api).
Dear TSM's!
I'm doing every day full backup and I'm dong log backup every two hours. I
keep 7 versions of a backup!
How can I store (select) each month one TDP Backup for Long time retention?
Backup set doesn't work because it is only for
B/A clients. I have tried with tdpsqlc backup * set
Hi fellows,
I have strange problem with administrative command line - dsmadmc.
According to manual, from version 5.2 there is a new option -dataonly=yes.
This option is working on my Windows client (version 5.2.0.6), but not on
my AIX
client. On my AIX 5.1 system, I have TSM server 5.2.2.5 and
Hi Perpetua!
In most cases the error PrivIncrFileSpace: Received rc=106 from
fioGetDirEntries is caused by incorrect permissions. You mention the client
to be a HP11, does that mean HP-UX version 11? If so, isn't TSM running
under the root account?
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch
Hi Zoltan!
The Image client was introduced in 3.7, so 3.7.0.0 is the minimum level.
Whether you should use that level...
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 17:51
Sounds like your baclient is up to date on AIX, but not the admin client
(they are different).
-Original Message-
From: Jozef Zatko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Admin command line problem
Hi fellows,
I have strange
But there are (at least I am no aware of any) no admin client instalation
files. I have just baclient and api client. And when I start admin client
I see following message:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr# dsmadmc
Tivoli Storage Manager
Command Line Administrative Interface - Version 5, Release 2, Level
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager
Command Line Administrative Interface - Version 5, Release 2, Level 2.0
(c) Copyright by IBM Corporation and other(s) 1990, 2003. All Rights
Reserved.
working OK on AIX 5.2 with the 5.2.2.0 admin client
Dwight E. Cook
Systems Management Integration Professional,
Hi List
I found the FIXEDIOBUFSIZE Parameter in the Tuning Guide.
should i set the value to 16 like recomended togheter with resourceutil 10.
The most tsm clients have resourceutil 2 in our environment, only 3 big nodes
have 10.
Does the Z/OS not manage the VSAM Buffers dynamic or do i not
The admin CLI -DATAONLY option is platform neutral. Thus it doesn't matter
on which OS you run the admin; it should work.
Check your enUS/dsmclientV3.cat file and make sure it's modification time
matches that of the dsmadmc module.
If you continue to have trouble with this option, contact IBM
tsm: ULTSM select date(pending_date) as Date,count(*) from volumes
where -
cont status='PENDING' group by Date
ANR2940E The reference 'Date' is an unknown SQL column name.
|
We wait to hear from our dba that backups are running too long.
Lan-free vs lan backups make a very noticable difference in their backup
times.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/30/2004 8:53:52 AM
Hello All!
TSM 5.2.2.5 server AIX 5.2
Sun Solaris Lan-Free client 5.2.2.5
Once the lan-free data transfer
Try using capital letters.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David E Ehresman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/01/2004 08:54 AM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: SQL Help
tsm: ULTSM select
Thanks for your reply, Yes it was permissioning errors
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 4:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: tsm server and nas client
Hi Perpetua!
In
The group by statement is incorrect, use the following:
group by pending_date
the conversion to date format is already taken care of
in the first part of the select statement.
David E Ehresman wrote:
tsm: ULTSM select date(pending_date) as Date,count(*) from volumes
where -
cont status='PENDING'
Any idea if there is any restriction with mounting nas filesystem
directly on our tsm server? I think if it's a soft/hard mount, might
cause problems on tsm server? Please Advise
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Loon, E.J. van
Mladen,
One way to do this is to create a separate NODENAME with
different policy settings and use that NODENAME to perform
a full back up of your SQL Server databases once per month.
Thanks,
Del
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess if I'd read the entire e-mail, instead of assuming I knew what the
problem was from the error, I'd have seen he was using caps for the where
clause. Oh well, no coffee yet today. Good eye Gretchen.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gretchen L. Thiele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
That does not give me the desired results:
tsm: ULTSM select date(pending_date) as Date,count(*) from volumes
where -
cont status='PENDING' group by pending_date
Date Unnamed[2]
-- ---
2004-11-27 1
2004-11-27 1
2004-11-27
Do I need to be aware of anything ?
I already have the allocated logical volumes for tsm db setup.
/dev/vx/rdsk/datadb/tsmdbvol02, but it is not defined as tsm volume
Steps I was going to follow:
1. Backup devconfig
2. Backup volhist
3. Backup db -- ba db devc=3584mclass type=full
4. Define
Try adding the DISTINCT keyword between SELECT and DATE(PENDING_DATE),
i.e.
select distinct date(pending_date) ...
You'll want to verify that the results are correct by matching up the
counts against the results of the select without DISTINCT. For example,
using the output you show below, I'd
*SMers,
I have been ordered to create a permanent copy of one directory (including all
files and subdirectories that I currently have stored on TSM for a particular
client. These files currently have a 30 day retention, and many of them change
daily, so I have 30 copies of a number of these
Andy,
that was it. I had badly setup my locale environment variable (LANG).
Thanx and best regards
Ing. Jozef Zatko
Login a.s.
Dlha 2, Stupava
tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
Andrew Raibeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/01/2004 02:20 PM
Please respond to
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kevin Kinder
I have been ordered to create a permanent copy of one
directory (including all files and subdirectories that I
currently have stored on TSM for a particular client. These
files currently have a 30 day retention,
Just wondering if anyone in the group is seeing any relief or is the
impact about the same in relation to the TSM DB and W2K System Objects.
Running TSM server version 5.2.3.1 on AIX 5.2
Client version 5.2.0.3.
Regards,
Matt Adams
Information Technology Services
Deloitte Services LP
Mark's right, there is no GOOD way to do this.
You can't create an archive with data that is already on TSM tapes,
except as a backupset, which can be a pain to track and can't be
browsed.
I've done this by using EXPORT along with some management class games
(Mark, if you can find a hole in this
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage)
Just wondering if anyone in the group is seeing any relief or
is the impact about the same in relation to the TSM DB and W2K
System Objects.
Running TSM server version 5.2.3.1 on AIX 5.2 Client
I thought the relief in System Object backups (that TSM will not back up
the files that haven't changed) was supposed to come with Win2K3 and XP,
not Win2K? (But then, I'm easily confused...)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adams,
I think that is correct...
But I have a TSM server that is 5.2.3.1 and the administrator is
complaining about DB growth. At this point I am asusming W2K System
Object backups.
I don't think updating the client version will impact how the TSM server
will handle System Objects..
-Original
Thanks for the help. Unfortunately, we can not get it to work:
ANS1168E ERROR: could not create image object.
The client is V5.1.5.1 on AIX 4.3 (we can not upgrade to V5.1.6 or higher
due to it requiring a bos.rte upgrade/reboot. These are our mail systems
and unless they crash, getting a
On Dec 1, 2004, at 11:13 AM, Prather, Wanda wrote:
Mark's right, there is no GOOD way to do this.
You can't create an archive with data that is already on TSM tapes,
except as a backupset, which can be a pain to track and can't be
browsed. ...
I'll also add that the lack of a simple way to
I thought I heard that in the TSM 5.3 versions would be the true incremental
of some of the System Object componentsbut you need to find out what's
growing your DB.
Couple thingsFirst search back as far as you need (or can) in the server
activity log for ANE4954I messages. This is the
Zoltan,
Hope, its not failing due to problem with unmounting the filesystem, during
image backup, each filesystem gets remounted read-only, unless you specify,
not to unmount (dynamic mode).
Best Regards,
Aftab S. Choudhry
Sr. Systems Administrator
.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist
ITSM has announced a special version of tsm to meet regulatory needs.
I forget the exact details, I think there is an extra charge.
A query license output includes these 2 lines -
Is Tivoli Storage Manager for Data Retention in use ?: No
Is Tivoli Storage Manager for Data Retention licensed ?:
I think that is correct...
But I have a TSM server that is 5.2.3.1 and the administrator is
complaining about DB growth. At this point I am asusming W2K System
Object backups.
I don't think updating the client version will impact how the TSM server
will handle System Objects..
Andy,
I don't think this is possible.
DISTINCT doesn't help
TSM always responds unknown SQL column when a results column is
included in the group by
It won't take a function in the GROUP BY
And It won't let me do a SELECT inside the FROM
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor
If you need relief before you get to Win2003, what some people do is:
1) exclude the systemobject from TSM backups
2) set up a Windows scheduled task that backs up the systemobject to a
flat file:
The command is:
C:\WINNT\system32\NTBACKUP.EXE backup systemstate /f
Nope. The filesystem we were testing with is not in use by anything and
can be dismounted.
We even tried with -imagetype=dynamic. Same error message !
Aftab Choudhry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/01/2004 12:13 PM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor
Need more help with this. Still cant get past the error. Here is some
information from the logs and the person setting things up:
The server is a Windows Server 2003. IIS 6 is installed. In addition,
it is a Sharepoint Services Server. It also serves as a back end to
Microsoft Project
Zoltan,
Please call IBM support. I can't diagnose problem with
this level of detail on the forum. The SQL Server log,
VDI error log, Event Log, and Data Protection for SQL
traces will help pinpoint the problem. IBM Service can
look at the above documentation and help resolve the
problem you are
Wanda,
Actually it works, but doesn't work when I plug it into the statement
shown in the post to which I responded, I get results (not an error), but
they are definitely goofy.
I'll report back if I find anything more substantive on this subject, but
I suspect that it may not be possible to do
Hello All!
I have a quick question concerning the generate backupset command. I am
trying to take a backupset that has the following filesystems included:
== fjsu103: ==
/p01
/p01/app/ibm/was/5.0
/p01/app/iw/tsite/iw-store
/p02
/p02/app/ibm/was/5.0/backups
Do I have to enter:
generate
Thanks anyway. Will place a service call !
Del Hoobler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
12/01/2004 01:26 PM
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: MS-SQL TDP return code - error
Zoltan,
On Dec 1, 2004, at 12:18 PM, William F. Colwell wrote:
ITSM has announced a special version of tsm to meet regulatory needs.
I forget the exact details, I think there is an extra charge.
A query license output includes these 2 lines -
Is Tivoli Storage Manager for Data Retention in use ?: No
Is
Dear Steave,
Thanks but that does not talk about my scenario.
My scenario is that :
1- I have stg pool that has scratch volumes=9
2- Eventhough there are other scratch volumes avaiulble in the library but the
system won't use those because of limit in point 1.
3- My backups would fail because it
Hi Richard,
yes you can suspend deletion. A bullet on the page says so.
But you can't add this feature on to an existing server, so it won't
help the original poster. See the redbook at
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=rdb2sg24709800
for an architectural overview. It only takes
Hello All
***
I have noticed in the activity log of one of the TSM servers that the schedule
prompter is contacting the client, then the prompter's connection is severed,
and then the backup is started at the client. This sequence is happening only
on one TSM server and appears to
You can specify ',' separated list of filespaces ( filesystems).
Best Regards,
Aftab S. Choudhry
Sr. Systems Administrator
Schenker Inc.
150 Albany Ave.
Freeport, NY 11520
ph 516 403 5406
fax 516 377 3099
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message is intended only for the use of the
Do I need to be aware of anything ?
I already have the allocated logical volumes for tsm db setup.
/dev/vx/rdsk/datadb/tsmdbvol02, but it is not defined as tsm volume
Steps I was going to follow:
1. Backup devconfig
2. Backup volhist
3. Backup db -- ba db devc=3584mclass type=full
4.
49 matches
Mail list logo
