AW: Resourceutil-Problems

2004-12-13 Thread Schaub Joachim Paul ABX-SECE-ZH
Why do not use Journaling? Is there not still a problem with the use of resourcutil in combination of backung up the sytemobject? Try to separat the Backup of Systemobjects with an separated scheduleand exclude it in the regulary backup. regards joachim -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-

AW: Resourceutil-Problems

2004-12-13 Thread Christoph Pilgram
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Schaub Joachim Paul ABX-SECE-ZH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 13. Dezember 2004 10:22 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: AW: Resourceutil-Problems Why do not use Journaling? Is there not still a problem with the use of resourcutil in

Re: DSMSCHED.LOG not showing file details

2004-12-13 Thread Richard Sims
... The amount of detail is determined by whether verbose or quiet is set inthe dsm.opt file. ... Quite so. More generally, whether Verbose or Quiet is set as a client option, which can also be effected in a server-side client option set. The poster should do 'dsmc q opt' to compile and check

How to backup large Unix filesystems on a Fastt?

2004-12-13 Thread Gerhard Rentschler
Hello, what is the best way to backup large Unix filesystems (5 TB or more) on a Fastt storage system to TSM? Normal incremental backup would take too long, especially with a large number of small files. Modern storage systems have built in features like flash copy. How can this be used for TSM

Re: TSM best Practices for tape drives using FC

2004-12-13 Thread Timothy Hughes
Thanks again, Steve, Tom, David and all for your responses on this subject! Steve Harris wrote: Well said Tom, Also add into the mix your san environment. eg host is on one switch but disk and multiple tape drives are connected into a second san switch, but there is only one inter

Re: Virtual Volumes Not Being Deleted

2004-12-13 Thread Wheelock, Michael D
Hi, In order to reclaim space on a copy pool that is a server to server virtual volumes you must: 1) run reclamation on the source copy pool. It must finish reclaiming and delete the volume. 2) run expire inventory on the target server. This will show up as deleting archives (because the

Re: TDP for Exchange

2004-12-13 Thread Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Hi Del! Thank you (and others on this list) for your reply! Our Exchange guys didn't read the manual closely enough, they indeed forgot to specify the /EXCSERVER parameter. Kindest regards, Eric van Loon KLM Royal Dutch Airlines -Original Message- From: Del Hoobler [mailto:[EMAIL

Backup Groupwise on Linux

2004-12-13 Thread Bill Boyer
Anyone backing up Groupwise 6.5 on Linux? I have a customer that is trying to decide whether to upgrade their Groupwise to Netware or Linux. TIA, Bill Boyer An Optimist is just a pessimist with no job experience. - Scott Adams

Re: Virtual Volumes Not Being Deleted

2004-12-13 Thread Mark Fergusson
Thanks Michael et al It is now ok Mark -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wheelock, Michael D Sent: 13 December 2004 14:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Virtual Volumes Not Being Deleted Hi, In order to reclaim space on a copy

FYI - 4GB file limit on Netware 6.5sp2

2004-12-13 Thread Joe Crnjanski
Got response today from TSM support regarding 4GB file size limit. Problem that we observed with backupset files greater than 4GB. Thought I can share it Hi Joe, get response from our development: This apar is to address the fact that the TSM client code: a) is not able to

Re: Backup Groupwise on Linux

2004-12-13 Thread Troy Frank
It depends somewhat on what their current skillset is. Unless they have heavy linux skill, with little netware, I'd say stay on netware for now. Linux support is relatively new, and not fully baked yet. This situation will likely change a lot in the next year however. There's also not really

Cannot rename filespace - help please.

2004-12-13 Thread Alan Davenport
Hello, A server in out farm is being rebuilt. I've been asked to retain the last backup of the old instance by renaming the filespace names of the last backup. The problem is when I try to rename the filespace it tells me it does not exist! q fi is021 Node Name Filespace

Re: Cannot rename filespace - help please.

2004-12-13 Thread David E Ehresman
Either use the fsid parm and specify by number rather than name or use the nametype=unicode parm. David [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/13/2004 1:16:51 PM Hello, A server in out farm is being rebuilt. I've been asked to retain the last backup of the old instance by renaming the filespace

Re: use of preallocated files in disk stgpool using devtype of file

2004-12-13 Thread Steve Bennett
Robert, You may be correct but the tsm for windows admin ref and command line dsmfmt -? don't show any option for specifying anything except MB. No -m or -g, just a number which is suppose to be in MB. I tried a -g and it is not allowed. Robert Clark wrote: dsmfmt -m -data filename 2000 is not the

DBtape won't go to scratch status

2004-12-13 Thread Timothy Hughes
Hello all, Not sure If I wrote about this one before, I do know I had this problem before but was never able to get it resolved. I have a couple tapes that are in Dbackup and I would like to change to scratch status I tried using update library volume using the TSM Gui and received the

-fromdate using GUI

2004-12-13 Thread rh
Hi All, Is there a way to accomplish the equivalent of the command line restore -fromdate using the client GUI? Too bad the GUI doesn't show the command line equivalent of what you have selected. As always thanks for your help, Rod Hroblak ADP __ Do you

Re: FYI - 4GB file limit on Netware 6.5sp2

2004-12-13 Thread Andrew Ferris
Thanks for the message Joe. I had a PMR with IBM too and my contact confirmed that there would be an APAR issued. I just haven't seen anything in writing yet. The four problems you listed are exactly what I'm seeing. I wonder how long it will take for a new NetWare cleint to show up. Andrew

Re: DBtape won't go to scratch status

2004-12-13 Thread Jin Bae Chi
or upd vol N00275 acc=readw gus Jin Bae Chi (Gus) System Administrator Data Center, CSCC 614-287-5270 614-287-5488 Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/13/2004 2:55:51 PM On Dec 13, 2004, at 2:16 PM, Timothy Hughes wrote: Hello all, Not sure If I wrote about this one before, I do

Re: image restore with incrementals using flash copy

2004-12-13 Thread Prather, Wanda
Paul, If you used the flash-copy (hardware) image to do the restore, then did a TSM restore with the ifnewer parm, how would that be different than if you used a TSM image? W -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Zarnowski Sent:

Re: use of preallocated files in disk stgpool using devtype of file

2004-12-13 Thread Robert Clark
dsmfmt -m -data filename 2000 is not the same thing as dsmfmt -g -data filename 2 1000m is not 1g (At least on AIX. Hopefully this is true on Windows as well.) [RC] Steve Bennett steve_bennett To

Re: image restore with incrementals using flash copy

2004-12-13 Thread Paul Zarnowski
At 03:24 PM 12/9/2004, Andy Raibeck wrote: Wouldn't this work? dsmc restore x:\ -subdir=yes -fromdate=mm/dd/ -fromtime=hh:mm:ss -replace=all where -fromdate and and -fromtime are the date/time that the image was taken. And Wanda Prather wrote: Paul, If you used the flash-copy (hardware)

Re: image restore with incrementals using flash copy

2004-12-13 Thread Prather, Wanda
Actually, I think the results will be the same whether you use Andy's syntax, or mine, assuming there have been NOTHING BUT incrementals done since the image. Either way, my point is that there is no magic associated with a TSM image restore followed by a TSM incremental restore. I don't think

Re: image restore with incrementals using flash copy

2004-12-13 Thread Richard Sims
If you used the flash-copy (hardware) image to do the restore, then did a TSM restore with the ifnewer parm, how would that be different than if you used a TSM image? This might be the answer I was looking for. But I am concerned that we get optimal restore performance. *If* TSM has to position

Multiple restore session

2004-12-13 Thread Abdulaziz Almuammar
Hi Everyone, we have TSM server 5.2 and we are trying to utilize the tape drives in the restore process for a windows client 5.2. we have changed the resourceutilization to 10 and maxnummp to 15 and we found that the multiple restore sessions are working only when we restore the whole drive but

TRW DSM.opt file

2004-12-13 Thread Timothy Hughes
Todd, Can you send me the DSM.opt file for TRW Thanks Tim

Send email to board by mistake

2004-12-13 Thread Timothy Hughes
Hello, Is there any way to delete a message that was accidentally sent to the adsm board by mistake. Thanks for any help!

Re: DBtape won't go to scratch status

2004-12-13 Thread Timothy Hughes
Richard, The Dbbackups are being pruned, see the following. We have Delete Volhistory set Schedule Name DELETE_VOLHIST_DBDACK Description - Command delete volhistory type=dbbackup todate=today-14 Priority 5 Start date 2002-06-18 Start time 08:57:00 Duration 1 Duration units HOURS Period 1 Period

Re: DBtape won't go to scratch status

2004-12-13 Thread Sander te Riet Scholten
Hello, If you use DRM, follow the steps below: If the database tapes are in status MOUNTABLE, you need to checkout those tapes, after the checkout the tapes will become VAULTRETRIEVE immediately. For some reason DB-tapes that are in the library will NOT become SCRATCH automatically. You need to

Re: DBtape won't go to scratch status

2004-12-13 Thread Jim Sporer
Run an AUDIT LIBRARY libname CHECKLABEL=BARCODE. Jim Sporer At 09:14 AM 12/14/2004 -0500, you wrote: Richard, The Dbbackups are being pruned, see the following. We have Delete Volhistory set Schedule Name DELETE_VOLHIST_DBDACK Description - Command delete volhistory type=dbbackup todate=today-14

Resourceutil-Problems

2004-12-13 Thread Christoph Pilgram
Hi all, We have W2K-Clients with (in general 2) very big filesystems ( more than 5 million files each) ( 2 GB RAM). They run with TSM-Client 5.2.2.0. Because memory runs too long in the night, we tried to do it with 'resourceutil 4'. We got an 'out of memory' abend. We gave 8 GB of RAM to the

Re: Resourceutil-Problems

2004-12-13 Thread Richard Sims
Christoph - In http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts see the Windows 2000 notes under the descriptions for messages ANS1030E and ANSE. Richard Sims

Re: How to backup large Unix filesystems on a Fastt?

2004-12-13 Thread Stapleton, Mark
Vyant's RealTime performs real-time replication of data on the AIX platform. Pro: you have an up-to-date disk-based backup of your data *anytime* you need it Cons: you need twice the disk space if the original gets corrupted, so does the replicant -- Mark Stapleton

Re: DBtape won't go to scratch status

2004-12-13 Thread Richard Sims
On Dec 13, 2004, at 2:16 PM, Timothy Hughes wrote: Hello all, Not sure If I wrote about this one before, I do know I had this problem before but was never able to get it resolved. I have a couple tapes that are in Dbackup and I would like to change to scratch status I tried using update library

Re: DBtape won't go to scratch status

2004-12-13 Thread Owings, Don
What is your reclamation set at on the DB2 pool? Have you tried running a move data on the tape to free it up?- -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Timothy Hughes Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 1:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: How to backup large Unix filesystems on a Fastt?

2004-12-13 Thread Paul Zarnowski
At 07:53 AM 12/13/2004, Gerhard Rentschler wrote: Hello, what is the best way to backup large Unix filesystems (5 TB or more) on a Fastt storage system to TSM? Normal incremental backup would take too long, especially with a large number of small files. Modern storage systems have built in

upgrade

2004-12-13 Thread Hashim, Shukrie BSP-ISM/116
hi all, I currently have TSM client version 5.1 lv 0 and TSM server version 5.1 lv 94 1) I am thinking of upgrading the client to the a certain level the last version for 5.1 is lv 7 (checked from IBM ftp) do you think I can straight away install the patch 5.1.7 without going thru ... 5.1.1,

Re: upgrade

2004-12-13 Thread Stapleton, Mark
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hashim, Shukrie BSP-ISM/116 I currently have TSM client version 5.1 lv 0 and TSM server version 5.1 lv 94 1) I am thinking of upgrading the client to the a certain level the last version for 5.1 is lv 7 (checked from IBM ftp)