Why do not use Journaling?
Is there not still a problem with the use of resourcutil in combination of
backung up the sytemobject?
Try to separat the Backup of Systemobjects with an separated scheduleand
exclude it in the regulary backup.
regards
joachim
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Schaub Joachim Paul ABX-SECE-ZH [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 13. Dezember 2004 10:22
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: AW: Resourceutil-Problems
Why do not use Journaling?
Is there not still a problem with the use of resourcutil in
... The amount of detail is determined by whether verbose or quiet
is set inthe dsm.opt file. ...
Quite so. More generally, whether Verbose or Quiet is set as a client
option, which can also be effected in a server-side client option set.
The poster should do 'dsmc q opt' to compile and check
Hello,
what is the best way to backup large Unix filesystems (5 TB or more) on a
Fastt storage system to TSM? Normal incremental backup would take too long,
especially with a large number of small files. Modern storage systems have
built in features like flash copy. How can this be used for TSM
Thanks again, Steve, Tom, David and all for your responses on this subject!
Steve Harris wrote:
Well said Tom,
Also add into the mix your san environment. eg host is on one switch but
disk and multiple tape drives are connected into a second san switch, but
there is only one inter
Hi,
In order to reclaim space on a copy pool that is a server to server
virtual volumes you must:
1) run reclamation on the source copy pool. It must finish reclaiming
and delete the volume.
2) run expire inventory on the target server. This will show up as
deleting archives (because the
Hi Del!
Thank you (and others on this list) for your reply!
Our Exchange guys didn't read the manual closely enough, they indeed forgot
to specify the /EXCSERVER parameter.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Del Hoobler [mailto:[EMAIL
Anyone backing up Groupwise 6.5 on Linux? I have a customer that is trying
to decide whether to upgrade their Groupwise to Netware or Linux.
TIA,
Bill Boyer
An Optimist is just a pessimist with no job experience. - Scott Adams
Thanks Michael et al
It is now ok
Mark
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Wheelock, Michael D
Sent: 13 December 2004 14:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Virtual Volumes Not Being Deleted
Hi,
In order to reclaim space on a copy
Got response today from TSM support regarding 4GB file size limit.
Problem that we observed with backupset files greater than 4GB.
Thought I can share it
Hi Joe,
get response from our development:
This apar is to address the fact that the TSM client code:
a) is not able to
It depends somewhat on what their current skillset is. Unless they have
heavy linux skill, with little netware, I'd say stay on netware for now.
Linux support is relatively new, and not fully baked yet. This
situation will likely change a lot in the next year however. There's
also not really
Hello,
A server in out farm is being rebuilt. I've been asked to retain
the last backup of the old instance by renaming the filespace names of the
last backup. The problem is when I try to rename the filespace it tells me
it does not exist!
q fi is021
Node Name Filespace
Either use the fsid parm and specify by number rather than name or use
the nametype=unicode parm.
David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/13/2004 1:16:51 PM
Hello,
A server in out farm is being rebuilt. I've been asked to
retain
the last backup of the old instance by renaming the filespace
Robert, You may be correct but the tsm for windows admin ref and command
line dsmfmt -? don't show any option for specifying anything except
MB. No -m or -g, just a number which is suppose to be in MB. I tried a
-g and it is not allowed.
Robert Clark wrote:
dsmfmt -m -data filename 2000
is not the
Hello all,
Not sure If I wrote about this one before, I do know I had this
problem before but was never able to get it resolved.
I have a couple tapes that are in Dbackup and I would like to change
to
scratch status I tried using update library volume using the TSM Gui
and
received the
Hi All,
Is there a way to accomplish the equivalent of the
command line restore -fromdate using the client GUI?
Too bad the GUI doesn't show the command line
equivalent of what you have selected.
As always thanks for your help,
Rod Hroblak
ADP
__
Do you
Thanks for the message Joe. I had a PMR with IBM too and my contact
confirmed that there would be an APAR issued. I just haven't seen
anything in writing yet. The four problems you listed are exactly what
I'm seeing. I wonder how long it will take for a new NetWare cleint to
show up.
Andrew
or upd vol N00275 acc=readw
gus
Jin Bae Chi (Gus)
System Administrator
Data Center, CSCC
614-287-5270
614-287-5488 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/13/2004 2:55:51 PM
On Dec 13, 2004, at 2:16 PM, Timothy Hughes wrote:
Hello all,
Not sure If I wrote about this one before, I do
Paul,
If you used the flash-copy (hardware) image to do the restore, then did
a TSM restore with the ifnewer parm, how would that be different than
if you used a TSM image?
W
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Paul Zarnowski
Sent:
dsmfmt -m -data filename 2000
is not the same thing as
dsmfmt -g -data filename 2
1000m is not 1g
(At least on AIX. Hopefully this is true on Windows as well.)
[RC]
Steve
Bennett
steve_bennett To
At 03:24 PM 12/9/2004, Andy Raibeck wrote:
Wouldn't this work?
dsmc restore x:\ -subdir=yes -fromdate=mm/dd/ -fromtime=hh:mm:ss
-replace=all
where -fromdate and and -fromtime are the date/time that the image was
taken.
And Wanda Prather wrote:
Paul,
If you used the flash-copy (hardware)
Actually, I think the results will be the same whether you use Andy's
syntax, or mine, assuming there have been NOTHING BUT incrementals done
since the image.
Either way, my point is that there is no magic associated with a TSM
image restore followed by a TSM incremental restore.
I don't think
If you used the flash-copy (hardware) image to do the restore, then did
a TSM restore with the ifnewer parm, how would that be different than
if you used a TSM image?
This might be the answer I was looking for. But I am concerned that we get
optimal restore performance. *If* TSM has to position
Hi Everyone,
we have TSM server 5.2 and we are trying to utilize the tape drives in the
restore process for a windows client 5.2.
we have changed the resourceutilization to 10 and maxnummp to 15 and we found
that the multiple restore sessions are working only when we restore the whole
drive but
Todd,
Can you send me the DSM.opt file for TRW
Thanks
Tim
Hello,
Is there any way to delete a message that was
accidentally sent to the adsm board by mistake.
Thanks for any help!
Richard,
The Dbbackups are being pruned, see the following.
We have Delete Volhistory set
Schedule Name DELETE_VOLHIST_DBDACK
Description -
Command delete volhistory type=dbbackup todate=today-14
Priority 5
Start date 2002-06-18
Start time 08:57:00
Duration 1
Duration units HOURS
Period 1
Period
Hello,
If you use DRM, follow the steps below:
If the database tapes are in status MOUNTABLE, you need to checkout those
tapes, after the checkout the tapes will become VAULTRETRIEVE immediately.
For some reason DB-tapes that are in the library will NOT become SCRATCH
automatically. You need to
Run an AUDIT LIBRARY libname CHECKLABEL=BARCODE.
Jim Sporer
At 09:14 AM 12/14/2004 -0500, you wrote:
Richard,
The Dbbackups are being pruned, see the following.
We have Delete Volhistory set
Schedule Name DELETE_VOLHIST_DBDACK
Description -
Command delete volhistory type=dbbackup todate=today-14
Hi all,
We have W2K-Clients with (in general 2) very big filesystems ( more than 5
million files each) ( 2 GB RAM). They run with TSM-Client 5.2.2.0. Because
memory runs too long in the night, we tried to do it with 'resourceutil 4'.
We got an 'out of memory' abend. We gave 8 GB of RAM to the
Christoph - In http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts
see the Windows 2000 notes under the descriptions for
messages ANS1030E and ANSE.
Richard Sims
Vyant's RealTime performs real-time replication of data on the AIX platform.
Pro: you have an up-to-date disk-based backup of your data *anytime* you need it
Cons: you need twice the disk space
if the original gets corrupted, so does the replicant
--
Mark Stapleton
On Dec 13, 2004, at 2:16 PM, Timothy Hughes wrote:
Hello all,
Not sure If I wrote about this one before, I do know I had this
problem before but was never able to get it resolved.
I have a couple tapes that are in Dbackup and I would like to change
to
scratch status I tried using update library
What is your reclamation set at on the DB2 pool? Have you tried running a
move data on the tape to free it up?-
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Timothy Hughes
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
At 07:53 AM 12/13/2004, Gerhard Rentschler wrote:
Hello,
what is the best way to backup large Unix filesystems (5 TB or more) on a
Fastt storage system to TSM? Normal incremental backup would take too long,
especially with a large number of small files. Modern storage systems have
built in
hi all,
I currently have TSM client version 5.1 lv 0 and TSM server version 5.1 lv 94
1) I am thinking of upgrading the client to the a certain level the last
version for 5.1 is lv 7 (checked from IBM ftp) do you think I can straight away
install the patch 5.1.7 without going thru ... 5.1.1,
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hashim, Shukrie BSP-ISM/116
I currently have TSM client version 5.1 lv 0 and TSM server
version 5.1 lv 94
1) I am thinking of upgrading the client to the a certain
level the last version for 5.1 is lv 7 (checked from IBM ftp)
37 matches
Mail list logo