Client v 5.3.0 on Windows 2003 server. Is there a bug out there (that I
can't find so far) that speaks to number of objects reported as being
backed up not being correct?
I know for a fact that more than 979 objects were backed up...
Sorry for any redundancy on this question.
Matt
Has anyone run across a limit (documented or otherwise) for the number
of lan-free clients one TSM server can handle?
We have one TSM server that we had 23 Exchange servers running lan-free
backups. We added 24 and 25, and now we are having a strange problem
where it appears these new clients
Can someone confirm that for, ITSM for Mail - Domino ver 5.1.5.1, that
5.1.5.1 is the latest version?
Thanks,
Matt
This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If
you are not the
Hello all...
I am looking for any experiences with this client version. We are
experiencing lots of errors as they relate to W2K03
SystemState/SystemServices backups. I have found lots of IC's and
APAR's relating to such. Going to a first relase of the client, is not
that enticing, but does
Windows Client version - 5.2.0.3 running on W2K Advanced Server- SP4
TSM Server- AIX v5.2 and TSM version 5.2.3.1
Has anyone experienced this during a restore of a Windows client?
ANSE ntrc.cpp(890): Received Win32 RC 1450 from pkReplaceOnReboot():
MoveFileEx
I have seen several posts
, December 20, 2004 1:09 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Windows Restore error
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage)
Windows Client version - 5.2.0.3 running on W2K Advanced
Server- SP4 TSM Server- AIX v5.2 and TSM version 5.2.3.1
Has
Just wondering if anyone in the group is seeing any relief or is the
impact about the same in relation to the TSM DB and W2K System Objects.
Running TSM server version 5.2.3.1 on AIX 5.2
Client version 5.2.0.3.
Regards,
Matt Adams
Information Technology Services
Deloitte Services LP
the files that haven't changed) was supposed to come with Win2K3 and XP,
not Win2K? (But then, I'm easily confused...)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage)
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:08 AM
To: [EMAIL
the files that haven't changed) was supposed to come with Win2K3 and XP,
not Win2K? (But then, I'm easily confused...)
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage)
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2004 11:08 AM
To: [EMAIL
Can anyone tell me why this is not working? The backups continue to
include data from G: H: J: and K:. This shouldn't be the case.
B/A client 5.2.0.3
TSM server 5.2.2.3
Dsm.opt has domain all-local
Client option set:
Optionset Description Last Update
That was my problem...
Thanks to Andy and all that responded.
Evidently I can't read very well...;-
Regards,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Raibeck
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Any thoughts on this?
ITSM for Mail v5.2.0.1 restoring Exchange data that was backed up using
ITSM for Mail 5.1.5.
Restoring to a different Exchange server than the original AND had to do
a TSM DB restore (to a different TSM server) to be able to go back to
the point and time they needed. We
TSM B/A client 5.2.0.3
Client: Windows 2000 Server
We have some IIS servers where Microsoft is recommending to change the
location of metabase.bin from c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv to a new
subdirectory located at c:\winnt\system32\inetsrv\metabase (see basics
of changes below)
I just want to get
_
From: Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage)
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 3:23 PM
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: Change to location of metabase.bin
TSM B/A client 5.2.0.3
Client: Windows 2000 Server
We have some IIS servers where Microsoft
I need some help
I upgraded my Windows TSM server from 5.1.5.2 to 5.2.2.3. Along the way
I didn't stop to uninstall the TSM Server licenses package for 5.1.5.
Now I cannot update my license information for the TSM server.
Uninstalling 5.1.5.0 TSM Server license package and trying to go to
Quickest way is to open up the TSM Restore GUI and go to the file and
from there you can tell what mgmt class it is bound to.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Christian Wadl
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 3:47 PM
To: [EMAIL
Problems we are encountering with LAN-free and TSM.
TSM server 5.1.6.7
TSM 3494 library with 3590H drives
Clients: W2K Server and Qlogic 2310F card
The biggest problem we are facing is with the storage agents and tape
drive mappings. If the tape drive goes off line for any reason, the
W2K Cluster server running 5.2.0.3 client.
TSM server running 5.1.6.7 on AIX.
Anyone seen where if you try to bind a file type to a specific
management class, it won't rebind? Trying backups via command line, GUI
or scheduled task have no effect. The mgmt class has been activated in
the
about the TSM server side. Is the node bound to the pol domain with
this management class? And is it all activated?
Regard,
Karel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 25 februari 2004 17:31
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp
I chose some files in the directory to always backup through the GUI
so that I could force them to rebind.
However, the dsmerror.log does show something interesting
02/25/2004 10:17:59 processSysvol(): NtFrsApiGetBackupRestoreSets(): RC
= 2
02/25/2004 10:17:59 processSysvol():
on
the next back up.
Regards,
Karel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 25 februari 2004 17:46
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: Binding files to mgmt class
This is all true
Node bound to correct policy domain
to
the local opt file.
Regards,
Karel
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 25 februari 2004 17:56
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: Binding files to mgmt class
Yep...tried that too. Still showing the files going
Unfortunately, same results... I guess it is time to go to support. I
have had this happen once before. Except in a different manner. An
incremental through the GUI would bind to the new mgmt class. The next
scheduled backup would rebind all the objects to the default (old) mgmt
class.
Is there anyway to control this scenario?
If someone makes a global permissions change, we get a backup of the
file whether or not the file itself (data related) changed or not.
Is there some way around this?
Thanks,
Matt Adams
Information Technology Services
Deloitte Services LP
: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: NTFS permission changes
From: Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If
someone makes a global permissions change, we get a backup of the file
whether or not the file itself (data related) changed
Just as an FYI, the uninstall/re-install did the trick.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Del Hoobler
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TDP SQL and TSM 5.2.0.3 client
Matt,
I would
Windows 2000 SP4 - B/A client 5.2.0.3
SQL 2000 - TDP for SQL 5.1.5
When trying to run SQL backups, I get this message:
C:\Program Files\Tivoli\TSM\TDPSqltdpsqlc backup * full
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Databases:
Data Protection for Microsoft SQL Server
Version 5, Release 1,
Great link Del, thanks for that.
I will give these things a try. Thanks again for your support to this
list.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Del Hoobler
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 10:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What version of the client?
Matt Adams
Information Technology Services (ITS)
615-882.6861
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Deloitte.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,GL-CSC
Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:09 AM
To: [EMAIL
Check to make sure your dsm.opt for the SQL client doesn't have any
unsupported communication protocols listed. (IPX/SPX, etc) 4.2.x
clients ignored them. 5.1.x clients does not.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Del Hoobler
Sent:
We are having a similar problem and 5.1.6.7 did not resolve the problem.
We are currently testing 5.2.0.3 on one of our problem Domain
Controllers. So far so good.
-Original Message-
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:45 AM
To: [EMAIL
;
recommended by MS to do so. This too you can only do through the
ntdsutil in AD offline mode.
Khalid Khan
ATC, LLC
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage)
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 8:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
B/A client 5.1.5.9
TDP for SQL 2.2.1
Windows 2000 SP4 / SQL Server 2000
TDP for SQL backup are failing with the following message: ACO5400E The
Virtual Device Interface is not registered with the Common Object Model.
I have never seen this one before. It sounds OS/SQL server related, but
I
Does anyone know if there is an APAR for this? This just bit us in the
butt big time on a LAN-free Exchange restore.
Regards,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte and Touche USA LLP
Forum: ADSM.ORG - ADSM / TSM Mailing List Archive
Date: May
We are experiencing the same problem...
Regards,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte and Touche USA LLP
-Original Message-
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Backing up
That is some good information.
We got around the problem as far as the BSOD with the stop 7b inaccessible
boot device message goes.
If we used Ntbackup, the problem went away. If we used TSM, the problem
occurred. It appears there is some registry setting that gets restored
using TSM that
a Disaster Recovery on new hardware.
Good luck
Christian
Från: Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: 2003/09/03 Wed PM 04:52:42 CEST
Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: Suggestions for W2K recovery
All,
I am looking
system or run a Disaster Recovery on new hardware.
Good luck
Christian
Från: Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Datum: 2003/09/03 Wed PM 04:52:42 CEST
Till: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ämne: Suggestions for W2K recovery
B/A client 4.1.2.12
TDP for SQL v2.2
SQL 2000 SP3
TSM server 5.1.6.2
AIX 5.1.5
We are having trouble backing up on particular DB. Anyone seen this before?
From tdpsql.log
09/03/2003 08:27:26 ACO0302E A failure occured on stripe number (0), rc =
418
09/03/2003 08:27:26 ANS1245E (RC122)
All,
I am looking for some suggestions on the best way to handle a W2K recovery
to different hardware. It is not so much the different hardware I am
battling, it is boot.ini. I am trying to find out at what point boot.ini
gets put into place from the restored server.
The current (old) server
Client - Windows 2000 Advanced Server running Exchange 2000. TDP for
Exchange v2.2
Hi all,
This is going to seem like a dumb question, but when you have TDP for
Exchange v2.2 already running on a system, and upgrade to ITSM for Mail
5.1.5, all of your old shortcuts are now broken. If you
The shortcut was made manually to the All Users desktop by going
C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Start Menu\Programs\Tivoli Storage
Manager\TDP for MS Exchange Server - V2 and copying the Exchange Client -
GUI to the All users desktop.
We didn't change the base installation directory. We
, 2003 2:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Resolved: URGENT!! TSM client schedules not running
On Wed, 13 Aug 2003 13:56:21 -0400
Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would doubt that you will never see it again.
We're on TSM server version 5.1.6.2 and have seen it one
Windows 2000 server -- B/A client 5.1.5.9 (occurs on other levels too)
TSM server - AIX 5.1 - Server code 5.1.6.2
This, ironically started happening at the same time as the latest MS worm
outbreak. Has anyone else experienced this??
Regards,
Matt
08/12/2003 22:11:31 ANS1183E An unknown
I would doubt that you will never see it again.
We're on TSM server version 5.1.6.2 and have seen it one more than one
occasion in the past 6 months.
Regards,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 12:45 PM
To: [EMAIL
I am having the same issue.
It is due to the latest MS worm hit to your W2K clients. If you will look
before you try a backup, the RPC service is not running. When it isn't
running, you get the errors below. If you reboot the box and RPC fires back
up, no problems on the backups.
Your
Just following up on a previous post to see if anyone has experienced this
yet...
Thanks,
Matt
Client: W2K or Win2003 server running Microsoft.net - B/A client version
5.1.5.9 or 5.1.6.0
TSM server: 5.1.6.2 on AIX 5.1
Has anyone else experienced problems backing up some files located
There is a MS Q article that addresses this issue.
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;810161
Although not smooth, we have successfully restored W2K to different
hardware.
Regards,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Roger Deschner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
It is better with later release, SP, etc. Still, I admit, not the best in
the world. Also, depending on the hardware you use, there are other
utilities. HP hardware agents for example have a function that will reset
the NIC, MAC address etc. We have incorporated this in DR documentation
for
Client: W2K or Win2003 server running Microsoft.net - B/A client version
5.1.5.9 or 5.1.6.0
TSM server: 5.1.6.2 on AIX 5.1
Has anyone else experienced problems backing up some files located in the
directory C:\windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\...\CONFIG\ on systems
running Microsoft.Net?
What is the client version??
We had similar problems with the 5.1.0.1 version of the client. An upgrade
to 5.1.5.9 resolved our problem.
Regards,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte and Touche USA LLP
-Original Message-
From: Amini, Mehdi
We are facing a similar situation as below. If we restore a directory to
its original location, it doesn't seem to over write the NTFS permissions of
the directory we are restoring. This is what we want. If we restore a
directory to some place other than the original location, it is inheriting
Are you running Norton Anti-virus on machine #2?
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 2:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Experiences with 5.2 on W2K
Anyone jumped on this version and installed it successfully ?
I have
Henrik,
I have had this same problem with the 5.1.0.1 client version. Backups
running fine then all of a sudden the backups on the System Objects will not
complete with the same problem you are describing.
My immediate resolution was to upgrade the client to 5.1.5.9, which may not
be suitable
We have Symposium in house and are using TSM to back it up. We timed the
backup based on some processes that are run to dump the db's to a network
file share. However, we have not been allowed to do a recovery test. So we
are not sure how well we could recover the systems in the event of a
Del,
I am having trouble with a TDP for Domino backup as well. TSM B/A client
5.1.5.9 and TDP for Domino 1.1.2.0. I am getting the following msg in
dsmerror.log. There is not much else that indicates the problem. DB's do
get examined and data gets sent, but I don't understand the reasoning for
Hi all,
We are on TSM server version 5.1.6.0 and I have noticed that the stats for
MediaW in the Summary table is incorrect some of the time, but not all of
the time. In doing a LAN-free backup, the total time for the backup was 43
minutes. The summary table showed 2143 secs of mediaw time
Directories get bound to the mgmt class with the longest retention in that
policy domain. You can bind the directories to a specific mgmt class with
the DIRMC option. Be careful that it as at least the same retention
policies as the files on your server.
I am sure others on the list will give
I also was not offered the option in testing 5.1.5.7, but so far my
recoveries have been ok.
Regards,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Salak Juraj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 2:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: activate registry keys with 5.1.5.7 client ?
Is there a way to keep the inactive version expiring?? If a client calls me
and wants to hold data for a node, if I just stop backups, then eventually
expiration will get the inactive copies and that is not what we want. And
if you change mgmt class for the node, the inactive copies won't be
Hi Maria,
I have a client that has the same exact problem producing the same error
messages. We are running TSM B/A client 5.1.5.2, TDP for SQL 2.2.1.0
running on TSM server 5.1.6.0 on AIX 4.3.3.
I tried the suggested changes in the ADSM.ORG posting, but they do not work.
The messages are no
Most Web client activities are ok. But if you use the Web client to do any
type of upd node activity, it will bring down your TSM server. We also
stopped all queries against the nodes table because we found it caused
issues as well.
Regards,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Jane
what you want, only the items changed and controlled under
adminstrator management. Level of authority would be Policy Domain.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday
Amen...
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 6:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: AW: 5.1.6 Fix
do they have QA methodology since 4.2.2.0 ?
It sure doesn't make Tivoli look good to have major defects in just about
In light of this, what would be the best way to protect a node's data from
expiring at all?? To keep from both active and inactive versions expiring??
If we rename the node and filespace, would the time based retention rules
eventually get the data?? Or since the new (renamed) node name never has
Yes. I have seen it tooargh
So far, I have just cancelled the session at the server level, and it will
go away until the next time the service is cycled..
Regards,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte and Touche USA LLP
-Original Message-
That may be, but it is still new to this client version and should not
occur.
-Original Message-
From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 8:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems with W2k Client 5.1.5.7
I've seen it too but don't
Yes. We had a similar problem when the web admin gui touched the nodes
table (I registered a new node shortly after the upgrade that brought the
server down). Also seemed to happen when a select ran against the nodes
table.
Waiting for fix from Tivoli. Supposedly fixed in 5.1.6.1.
Regards,
We had one of our TSM servers on 5.1.6 go down again this morning. The log
filled up even though an incremental backup of the DB finished well before.
Log pinned issue returning???
-Original Message-
From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003
We upgraded 2 TSM servers to it. Have had multiple problems since. It
appears if the Web Admin GUI hits the node table at all, it bring TSM server
down. We battled it for days before it was figured out. Apparently there
is a bug in the node table in this version. We are not using the Web
Hi all,
TSM client ver 5.1.1.0 - WinNT4.0
TSM server ver 4.2.1.11 - Aix 4.3.3
Can anyone help me understand what is going on?? We have a node that runs a
nightly cmd file to do shutdown a DB, do some cleanup, run a TSM backup,
then start the DB back up again.
Ever since I went 5.1.0.1
(as described in B/A Client's guide). However it is better to dig down the
actual reason for non-zero return code.
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02.01.2003 23:33
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;810161
Regards,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloite and Touche USA LLP
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage)
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 3:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
IT Consultant
Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] 21.11.2002 23:06
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:TSM Server setup
Hi all,
I have a test TSM server
Hi all,
I have a test TSM server running 5.1.5.2 on W2K. There is a QUANTUM DLT
7000 SCSI attached 4 drive manual library. I am using the TSM device driver
to see the tape drive. I can label and use a tape in one of the drives.
The problem is there is 4 tape drives, but TSM only sees one. Is
I have just had my first instance of this. Same symptoms as Geoff.
Client NT4.0 TSM V5.1.5.2
Server AIX 4.3.3 TSM V4.2.1.11
Regards,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Holzwarth [mailto:stefan.holzwarth;ADAC.DE]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 5:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Occuring on my W2K clients as well...
Has anyone opened a ticket on this?
-Original Message-
From: Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage)
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:41 AM
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: RE: Error initializing TSM Api
I have just had my first instance
You can use a tool called blat.exe that can accomplish the same thing. I
would check the help for it before trusting my syntax below.
Syntax example
blat c:\progra~1\tivoli\tsm\baclient\dsmsched.log -t [EMAIL PROTECTED] -s
%computername% Backup status -f [EMAIL PROTECTED] -server smtp
Here is the background info:
Client: Compaq GL380 running W2K SP3. TSM client 5.1.5.2
TSM server: TSM version 4.2.1.11 running on AIX 4.3.3
The problem:
We use Compaq Insight Agents to team the NIC's for redundancy. There is a
built in NIC and an additional NIC added.
We perform the
Neil,
We had the same problem began to pop up on a few of our SQL servers as well.
After working with Tivoli and MS, the start up switch recommended by MS is
what we use and have not had any problems out of SQL server backup since
implementing the switch.
Regards,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage
Anyone experienced problems using this version of the B/A client??
Regards,
Matt
- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. -
If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this
Anyone had a problem on a W2K recovery where the Server service would not
start?? All events seem to go ok. The application riding on the server
works fine. But this service and its dependents will not start.
Used B/A client version 5.1.0.1 on TSM server v4.2.1.11 on AIX 4.3.3.
Any thoughts
Andy,
I just went to the FTP site and didn't find it. If you get a chance, post
the link or you can respond to me directly.
Thanks,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte Touche USA LLP
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Raibeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
] (change eye to i to reply)
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.
Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/18/2002 11:24
Please respond to ADSM: Dist
Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) would like to recall the message, mass Windows
client dsm.opt file edit.
- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. -
If you are not the intended recipient, you
Sorry all. I didn't see Steve's post until I had already hit send
Regards,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte Touche USA LLP
-Original Message-
From: Steve Schaub [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:05 PM
To: [EMAIL
Why not just bind them to a TSM server client option set?? Changes are a
lot easier to apply to hundreds of nodes this way.
Regards,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte Touche USA LLP
-Original Message-
From: J M [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Diana,
Have you tried backing this node up under a different node name as a test??
I had a problem similar to this on a client. All bacukps were running fine,
then one day, strange messages in activity log. We could get a backup to
finish under a different node name. All that we could surmise
unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.
Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/28/2002 07:11
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
All,
Is there a Tivoli agent to backup Sybase running on W2K?? Does anyone else
have this setup and use something else??
Thanks,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte Touche USA LLP
- This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information
Is it documented that (IC32797) is corrected in 5.1.1?
Thanks,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte Touche USA LLP
-Original Message-
From: Don France [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.
Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/20/2002 06:33
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Thanks Eliza. I am in the same boat as Tab, I have experienced it
intermittently, but haven't reported it because we rarely boot our W2K
servers.
If you have the time, and think about it, let us know the APAR number
assigned.
Thanks,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Marc,
What level of the B/A client are you using?
Regards,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte Touche USA LLP
615.882.6861
-Original Message-
From: Marc Levitan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 13, 2002 9:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
Anyone have any suggestions on tweaking TSM server and client settings for
Exchange LAN-free backups??
We are testing LAN-free backups to SAN-attached tape drives and disks.
TSM Server version: 5.1.1.0
TSM Storage agent: 5.1.1.0
TDP for Exchange: 2.2.0.0
Thanks for anything that can
Remove the s in %dates%
It should be %date%
Give that a try.
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte Touche USA LLP
615.882.6861
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hefty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 3:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More than likely, you have a situation where the directories are being bound
to the longest mgmt class you have for archiving in that policy domain.
If you look at the regular backup data the same thing should be occurring.
Directory entries are showing but the data may already be expired. The
Can anyone else confirm this bug??
Thanks,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte Touche USA LLP
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Schreiber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 6:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Missing bytes in
To the best of my knowledge, TSM 5.1 is not supported for Win9x clients.
Regards,
Matt Adams
Tivoli Storage Manager Team
Hermitage Site Tech
Deloitte Touche USA LLP
615.882.6861
-Original Message-
From: Keith Kwiatek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 10:07 AM
: Andrew Raibeck/Tucson/IBM@IBMUS
Internet e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (change eye to i to reply)
The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked.
The command line is your friend.
Good enough is the enemy of excellence.
Adams, Matt (US - Hermitage) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
