Je serai absent(e) du 25/02/2004 au 15/03/2004.
En cas d'urgence, Appelez le standard RGB qui pourra me joindre
Hello all,
I already posted this message and got no response, I don't know how to
manage this problem.
I tried to upgrade to TSM 4.2.4.1 but it didn't change anything.
I have a problem with my tsm server which crashes each morning during a
script designed to analyse the server (different
Hi,
Sorry but you have deleted the files from the database. In fact, they are
not erased from the the tape so a restore vol won't help.
The only way I know would be to restore an old database backup, you could
do it on another server if you can.
Cordialement
Etienne GUILLAUMONT
e-mail : [EMAIL
Hello all,
I have a problem with my tsm server which crashes each morning during a
script designed to analyse the server (different select to create a
readable report)
I have the following error : ANR7837S Internal error TBCOL989 detected.
I am at level 4.2.3.4 on AIX 4.3.3
I tried an audit DB
Hi,
I don't understand why the incremental backups should be expired if you set
the backup copy group to retain data for 30 days. If you make that, you
will keep all the backups for 30 days : 4 or 5 full backups and as much
incremental backups than the file was modified.
But I think you haven't
Get your own 800 number
Voicemail, fax, email, and a lot more
http://www.ureach.com/reg/tag
On, GUILLAUMONT Etienne ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Hello,
My TSM level is 5.1.6.2
My database size is 2.3 Gb
My TSM server is a Ibm RS/6000 43p140 AIX
Hello,
I had a problem with my TSM db, it couldn't make a reclamation with an
error on the db (some raws could not be deleted as I remember)
So I am trying to do an auditdb but the problem is that I get the
followings messages :
ANR4306I AUDITDB: Processed 324433 database entries (cumulative).
, Mar 26, 2003 at 04:13:14PM +0100, GUILLAUMONT Etienne wrote:
I had a problem with my TSM db, it couldn't make a reclamation with an
error on the db (some raws
Hello,
I have a problem with my library Storagetek l20, Nothing works and each
time TSM tries to use it, I get the following messages :
ANR8478W Invalid home slot address in inventory for library L20; volume =
LOTA03;slot = 1016.
ANRD mmsscsi.c(6779): ThreadId48 Unable to build active slot
Hello,
I did that at a customer's : One single drive LTO autoloader in which I
have the primary backup pool and also the db backups and one single
external DLT1 drive for offsite copies. Each day, I backup the primary pool
to the DLT1. The main problem is that I had to write scripts in order to
Center/IS/Papa Johns International
WWJD
GUILLAUMONT
Etienne To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
NOLOGIE.FR Subject: Re: progressive
backup vs. full + incremental
Ok, now I understand what you meant. One solution would be to have two tape
pools : one containing 20 tapes for you 50 clients, and one with 1467
volumes for the rest. If you don't want collocation for all your clients,
it is the only solution I can imagine. But still it is not the diskpool
which
would it take for you to restore say 1 computer of the 20 like in a DR
situation? and why if you don't mind explaining?
Thank You,
Bill Rosette
Data Center/IS/Papa Johns International
WWJD
GUILLAUMONT
Etienne To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
if you have a reclamation threshold of 70%,just sum the occupancy of you
nodes and divide it by 0,3, it should give you a good approximation.
Etienne GUILLAUMONT
e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RGB Technologie
Parc d'Innovation, Bâtiment PYTHAGORE
11 Rue Jean SAPIDUS
67400 ILLKIRCH
Tél : 03 90 40
I don't understand why collocation should use more tapes. Of course it
would be probably better to have one tape by client but if you manage to
backup for example 50 small clients on 20 tapes, you could use collocation
without buying more tapes. The difference would be that instead of backing
up
Hi,
This performances may be normal as when you reclaim a tape, it does not
read with full capacities of the drive, TSM search for the first file on
the tape, reads it, search for the next file, reads it ... and so on. It's
normal that the data throughput is less than the maximum of the tape
Rosette
Data Center/IS/Papa Johns International
WWJD
GUILLAUMONT
Etienne To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]cc:
NOLOGIE.FR Subject: Re: progressive
backup vs. full
Hello,
You didn't say in what type of OS you where. If it is unix, no problem, you
just have to add a sleep command. If you have a unix box within you
clients, you can also install dsmadmc on it and make the script on unix
which is far better for shell scripts and automations than windows.
The
Hello,
Here is what I use on AIX4.3.3 to make automatic checkin every morning, it
is done in ksh.
#!/bin/ksh
dsmadmc -id=admin -pa=admin checkin libv l20 search=bulk
checkl=barcode status=private
sleep 15
REQNO=$(dsmadmc -id=admin -pa=admin q req|grep ANR8373I| awk '{print
an fyi I have figured it out AIX has a limit of 64 gb. jfs
Paul
-Original Message-
From: GUILLAUMONT Etienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL
Hello,
Did you modify the /etc/security/limits and did you create the fs with the
large file enabled option ? I suggest to create a fs with allocation group
size of 64 MB and 131072 bytes per i-node.
I don't know any other limitation for AIX to create big files, except the
limitation of
of bytes per inode 16384
Compression algorithm no
Large File Enabled true
Allocation Group Size (MBytes) 64
-Original Message-
From: GUILLAUMONT Etienne [mailto:[EMAIL
)?
What is the fileset and version for the ITSM device driver?
You hope wrong or you hope normal :-)
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
GUILLAUMONT Etienne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
21.02.2003 15:07
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Hello,
I juste upgraded my TSM server on AIX 4.3.3 to 5.1.6.2 from 4.1.6 and I had
to reinstall the devices software at 4.1 level to have my Storagetek work.
The library functionned but the DLT1 drives where unable to read tapes. I
got the following message :
20.02.03 14:06:43 ANR8302E I/O
even use UNC names for file volumes (it is better than using drive
mapping, bacause you do not need to be logged in to console on TSM server)
Ing. Jozef Zatko
Login a.s.
Dlha 2, Stupava
tel.: (421) (2) 60252618
GUILLAUMONT Etienne
eguillau@RGB-TECHN
Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to have a storage pool on a remote
machine without installing TSM on it. Typically, what I wan't to do is to
use space on a remote server to have a disk or a file storage pool on it. I
tried with a file device class and it allows only local disks. A
Hello,
I tried to install TSM 5.1.5 server on Linux but I have a problem because
my level is 7.3 red hat with a 2.4.18.24 kernel and for the devices, TSM
requires an older kernel. Is there any possibility to have TSM work on my
linux level ?
Etienne GUILLAUMONT
e-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RGB
: GUILLAUMONT Etienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I would like to know if it is possible to have a storage pool
on a remote machine without installing TSM on it. Typically,
what I wan't to do is to use space on a remote server to have
a disk
???
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
GUILLAUMONT Etienne
I hope you will excuse me to be so direct but I think that you last
answer
is stupid,
Actually, I won't excuse you, and there's no need to be insulting.
did you ever look at the price of a single drive library
Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
GUILLAUMONT Etienne
I hope you will excuse me to be so direct but I think that you last
answer
is stupid,
Actually, I won't excuse you, and there's no need to be insulting.
did you ever look at the price of a single drive library
compared to a three
I hope you will excuse me to be so direct but I think that you last answer
is stupid, did you ever look at the price of a single drive library
compared to a three drive library ? And I don't talk of the fact that most
3 drives libraries require the advanced library TSM feature which
multiplies
Hello,
I had once such a problem and I found that one of my drive had had problems
with cleaning and TSM was unable to read the onsite Volume. The problem is
that TSM had put the unreadeable tape to unavailable status. I just had
to issue a upd vol X acc=readw and evrything was ok. If this
Why don't you just check the volumes whose access is offsite and whose
status is empty ? This is what I do. And to be sure that all volumes
present in library are in an readwrite status, I just put all the volumes
of the copypool in offsite state and then all the volumes of the libvol in
Hello,
I would like to know the best way to backup different filespaces on the
same server on
different storagepools. Do I have to define 2 nodes for the server
containing the filespaces or is there another way to associate 2 management
classes to a single server ?
Etienne GUILLAUMONT
e-mail :
34 matches
Mail list logo
