I have SP running using directory container. Does anyone know how it
generates the SUR usage?
I have a cronjob that runs what did you do in the last 24h and once a week
I get this output:
SUR_ARCH_OCCUPANCY 1 0.00
SUR_OCCUPANCY 1 125290.75
SUR_RET_OCCUPANCY 1 0.00
settings by IBM are:
>
> kernel.sem (SEMMNI) 16384
> kernel.sem (SEMMSL) 250
> kernel.sem (SEMMNS) 256 000
> kernel.sem (SEMOPM) 32
>
>
> Regard, Uwe
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager Im Auftrag von J.
> Eric Wonderley
> Ge
I upgraded our target server from rhel7.6 to rhel7.8 and now dsmserv
doesn't come up. The server worked fine on 7.6.
After moving to rhel7.8 I now see this fail on an interactive startup:
ANR0990I Server restart-recovery in progress.
ANR0152I Database manager successfully started.
ANR0172I
I have a source and target server v818 participating in replication.
Anyhow I see to see lots of automated container moves on the target. Is
this normal? I don't see it on the source server:
Protect: BARGE>q proc
Process Process Description Process Status
Number
Hi Eric:
I'm running v8.1.8 with containershere's what I have:
vm.dirty_background_ratio = 10
vm.dirty_ratio = 40
vm.dirty_expire_centisecs = 3000
vm.dirty_writeback_centisecs = 500
net.core.rmem_max = 212992
net.core.wmem_max = 212992
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 4096 87380 6291456
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem
We are backing up one with ba client over nfs.
Its fairly large so this is slow.
I don't believe its capable of ndmp. Does anyone backup qumulo using some
other method? I know I could setup several nfs mounts and breakup the
directory tree...but i think this would be somewhat complicated.
Get all zeros...
We have these settings on a dell730:
ipcs -l
-- Messages Limits
max queues system wide = 516096
max size of message (bytes) = 65536
default max size of queue (bytes) = 65536
-- Shared Memory Limits
max number of segments = 129024
max seg size (kbytes)
, it depends:
> https://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg22012594
>
> --
> Michael Prix
>
> On Thu, 2019-06-13 at 13:13 -0400, J. Eric Wonderley wrote:
> > Is this activity supported with SP?
> >
> > I recall in the past it was not but you could go to devc=file
> >
> > Thanks much
>
Is this activity supported with SP?
I recall in the past it was not but you could go to devc=file
Thanks much
r Manager On Behalf Of Michael
> Prix
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 10:00 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] backup db failure on 817 rhel7.6
>
> Hello,
>
> check for tsmdbmgr.opt in the instance directory and
> /opt/tivoli/tsm/server/bin/dbbkapi/dsm.
I'm getting this failure:
ANR2017I Administrator SERVER_CONSOLE issued command: BACKUP DB devc=dbfile
type=full
ANR0984I Process 3 for Database Backup started in the BACKGROUND at
04:33:11 PM.
ANR4559I Backup DB is in progress.
ANR2280I Full database backup started as process 3.
IBM Spectrum
Anyone ever see fail/timeout errors like this?:
04/29/2019 12:04:20 ANR3691E The transaction failed for process
CONVERT
STGPOOL, process number 40838, because of a
transaction
timeout. (SESSION: 50394593, PROCESS: 40838)
04/29/2019 12:04:20
erver being available!
>
> On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:41 AM J. Eric Wonderley
> wrote:
>
> > We have a pair of tsm servers doing backup and replication. Each has a
> > database over 1TB on ssd and 512G of memory
> >
> > Our organization likes to do os patch m
We have a pair of tsm servers doing backup and replication. Each has a
database over 1TB on ssd and 512G of memory
Our organization likes to do os patch maintenance every 90d and doing this
requires a stop and restart of db2. When would it be best to do
maintenance to shorten the rollback time?
Looking thru my actlog I noticed msgs like these:
01/30/2019 08:59:07 ANR4847W REPLICATE NODE detected an extent with ID
9421329176063255953 on container
/orion_c3/18/1843.ncf that is marked
damaged. (SESSION: 65110496, PROCESS: 31257)
01/30/2019 08:59:08 ANR4847W REPLICATE NODE
cha
> that has bitten me in the past.
>
> Roger Deschner
> University of Illinois at Chicago
> "I have not lost my mind; it is backed up on tape somewhere."
>
> ________
> From: J. Eric Wonderley
> Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 11
We are getting failures that show out of space when we are NOT out of
space?:
ORA-19511: non RMAN, but media manager or vendor specific failure, error
text:
ANS1311E (RC11) Server out of data storage space
I have tsm v8.1.5 on linux and it does not run...:
[e1derley@yacht ~]$ dsmadmc
ANS1398E Initialization functions cannot open one of the IBM Spectrum
Protect logs or a related file: /reports/dsmerror.log. errno = 13,
Permission denied
[e1derley@yacht ~]$ ll /reports/dsmerror.log
-rw-r--r-- 1 root
we trying to lock out clients from a server we're moving off of but we also
want data to expire for the locked out clients
maybe we need to rename the nodes instead
I have a client that runs a guest and inside the guest he has ba client
installed. There is a nat between the host and guest.
He also has a ba client running in the host.
We are seeing this error in the host logs. The logs a quiet for about 10m
then lots of these errors.
Also this a laptop
I think I want to setup my cert list to look like:
[tsminst1@barge tsminst1]$ gsk8capicmd_64 -cert -list -db cert.kdb -stashed
Certificates found
* default, - personal, ! trusted, # secret key
! 198.82.161.20:1500:0
*- "TSM Server SelfSigned SHA Key"
This machine can ping server 198.82.161.20
I
21 matches
Mail list logo
