Hi all,
short question ;-)
is it possible to send the failed/missed reports from the Operational Reporting
tool to more than one email-address?
If yes - How can we do this?
We need to send the mails to the node admin and his deputy.
Thanks in advance!
--
mit freundlichen Grüßen
Joachim Stumpf
Hi Joe,
at the German Storage Users-Guide in Nuremberg IBM told us last week that 5.3 will be
available in december via ftp and in january via CD.
I think you should call IBM if you are planning to migrate to 5.3 as fast as it will
come out to get a beta version for test.
Good luck ;-)
--
Hi together,
I searched adsm.org but found no useful help for InsertSlashHack ...
Has anyone seen this error before?
This happens since a few days on a W2K-Node with 5.1.5.9 (TSM-Server 5.2.2.1 on z/OS).
The admin of the W2K Node told us that there is no file Ri... On that
you can also look at
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/TSMM/SC32-9103-00/en_US/HTML/info_show_cmds.html
--
mit freundlichen Grüßen
Joachim Stumpf
Abt. P1514 Datenschutz/Storage Systemadministration
Datev eG
Paumgartner Straße 6-14, 90329 Nürnberg
Tel.: 0911 276 7452
mailto:[EMAIL
Joe,
at the moment we are migrating from 5.1.6.3 to 5.2.1.1 (straight!).
We had a performance issue which you can fix with a ZAP (APAR PQ80211).
If you upgrade without doing the cleanup backupgroups on 5.1.7.3 (or later) first,
the TSM-Server will do it itself after upgradedb. This process
Hi,
at the moment we are migrating from 5.1.6.3 to 5.2.1.1 on z/OS (But we are not
migrating to 5.1.8 first).
After upgradedb of the first server we had a huge problem with the performance and IBM
told us to ZAP our DSMSERV module in the linklib (APAR PQ80211).
Now everything works fine and I
Sam,
if I want to trace a W2K client I use these parameters in the opt-file:
*
* Tracelog-File
*
*TRACEFlags service
TRACEFlags perform
TRACEFIle C:\Programme\Tivoli\TSM\baclient\dsmtrace.log
--
mit freundlichen Grüßen / regards
Joachim Stumpf
Hi,
at the moment we are migrating from 5.1.6.3 to 5.2.1.1.
If you are at 4.x you should have a look at:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1PQ80211
We had big problems with the performance during upgradedb (AuditDB run 80h with a 16GB
database and used over 65h CPU).
After the ZAP
something about this earlier. I wonder if it
applies, though, as we are moving from 4.1.x and the problem description
specifically references 4.2 and 5.1
From what release did you jump to 5.1.6?
Stumpf, Joachim wrote:
Hi,
at the moment we are migrating from 5.1.6.3 to 5.2.1.1.
If you are at 4.x you
Hi,
we saw nearly the same on upgrade from 5.1.6.3 to 5.2.1.1 on MVS.
Upgrade went fine, but after start of the server with the new version TSM starts a
process which you cannot see with q proc, uses lots of CPU, doesnt respond to MVS
modify commands and lags with the AdminGUI.
With the help
Hi Eric,
I noticed the same on TSM Server 5.2.1.1 on MVS:
dsmc:
Session established with server TADSM12: MVS
Server Version 5, Release 2, Level 0.0
q st:
Storage Management Server for MVS - Version 5, Release 2, Level 1.1
Server Name: TADSM12
--
mit
Hi Bala,
look at http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21054144
hope that helps ;-)
regards,
Joachim Stumpf
Balasubramanian Krishnamurthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Montag, 16. Juni 2003, 18:04:27,
MEST):
Hi,
We are currently using NFS based backups for backing up our neap
Hi,
use this command to determine if your filespace is unicode enabled:
q fi nodename * f=d
Look if you can find the following line:
Is Filespace Unicode?:
If unicode is NO you have to rename your existing filespace and have to backup the
node again (new full backup).
Then it should be unicode
@Richard:
I didn't know that - thanks for the info
(Unfortunately I'm not very familiar with Linux, but will work on it ;-))
@Mordechai:
In this case you should do what Richard mentioned in his preview posting...
regards,
Joachim Stumpf
Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 17. Juni 2003,
Hi all,
on GSE/Europe they (IBM) told us that the ITSM 5.2 will be released in May or June.
An there should be a new ITSM-Server for Linux z/Series too ;-)
--
regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Joachim Stumpf
Datev eG
Nuremberg - Germany
- Original-Nachricht folgt
Hello,
with the help from support I was able to delete the filespace.
But first:
auditdb inventory fix=yes on TSM-Server 5.1.6.2 finished
with RC=1 after 65000 lines of output -- and the the error
was still there.
After upgrading the TSM-Server to 5.1.6.3 I was able to run the
auditdb with
Shannon,
we are running ITSM 5.1.6.1 on z/OS 1.4.
Till now we have no problems with this version.
We had a problem with 5.1.6.0 and the admin-gui which was fixed with 5.1.6.1.
At the moment I have an open PMR at IBM with a (I think) corrupted DB on our 5.1.6.2
TEST server.
This problem is still
Hello together,
I tried to delete a filespace on my TSM-Test-server (V5.1.6.2 on z/OS 1.4) and got the
following messages.
Has anyone seen this before? What can I do? Is my DB corrupted?
ANR2017I Administrator T03281A issued command: DELETE FILESPACE T03281A 4
NAMETYPE=FSID TYPE=ANY
Henk ten Have,
the result of show bfo 0 243145 is
Bitfile Object: 0.243145 Bitfile Object NOT found.
I called support (created pmr at IBM-Webpage) and wait now for their call ;-)
And I think I'm lucky - my TEST-DB is only 500MB...
thanks for your help - I will post here again when I have a
try ftp://service.boulder.ibm.com via anonymous ftp and
guide your ftp client through the directories to the
client downloads.
--
regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Joachim Stumpf
Datev eG
Nuremberg - Germany
Abdulaziz Almuammar [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 21. Januar 2003, 13:52:01,
Hello out there,
we upgraded our Novell-Clients with version 4.2.3.0 and now we have problems with the
backups.
cut from the errorlog:
...
01/15/2003 20:32:33 (TSA500.NLM 5.5 315) The program's attempt to scan failed,
probably because an invalid path was specified.
01/15/2003 20:32:33
just send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body:
unsubscribe adsm-l
--
regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Joachim Stumpf
Datev eG
Nuremberg - Germany
Jaganathan, Velumani [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 3. Dezember 2002,
09:18:24, CET):
Hello All,
How do I unsubscribe from this
Hi together,
today I upgraded our TSM-test-server (z/OS) from V5.1.5.1 to V5.1.5.2.
If I perform a SELECT * FROM NODES I see 3 new fields in the
table (NODES.TCP_NAME, NODES.TCP_ADDRESS, NODES.GUID).
But the TCP_Name and TCP_address are not valid name or address
I only see:
TCP_NAME = åàà
Hi Donna,
I followed the link under Self help in hope to get
information about a new ITSM-Server version
on z/OS. But there's *NOTHING*.
I did not found any information about z/OS server updates on 5.1.x.x.
Only w2k, aix, solaris, etc are supported.
I created an PMR at IBM-Germany and asked for
Hi Sascha,
we had the same question a few months ago.
The network transfer rate doesnt tell you something about your network speed.
As far as I know the network transfer rate is calculated like this:
All bytes sent from the Node
session time
where the session time
Hi,
we have the same problem with one of our servers.
If I do a q assoc the server crashes with 0C4.
...
ANR5965I Console command: Q ASSOCIATION
ANR2017I Administrator SERVER_CONSOLE issued command: QUERY ASSOCIATION
PADSM00 abending: MVS Abend code 000C4000
Hi Timothy,
this was already discussed in this list...
the RC=4 in 4.2.0.0 client is a code defect.
You should use the last fixtest for 4.2.
--
regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Joachim Stumpf
Datev eG
Nuremberg - Germany
taford [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 25. Juni 2002, 18:49:30,
If you use TSM-Server 4.1.3 there is a known error with the DEL VOLHIST command.
It is fixed in 4.1.5 and allows a FORCE=YES Parameter.
http://techsupport.services.ibm.com/server/390.uhuic_getrec?args=DVsteamboat.boulder.ibm.com+DB390+DA48383+STPQ51312+USbin
--
regards / Mit freundlichen
Hi Sean,
in our installation an audit took about 4-5h for a 10GB DB on TSM-server 4.1.3 (OS:
OS/390 R2.10).
A few months ago I had an open pmr at IBM where I wanted to know WHY my DB is
inconsistent after the loaddb but they couldnt give me an answer :(
--
regards / Mit freundlichen
Hi Rob,
I think this depends on the language your server and clients are running with...
...and if you use unicode filespaces (not supported until 4.2.x.x servers) you
shouldnt have
problems with special language characters...
--
regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Joachim Stumpf
Datev eG
Hi together,
i asked this question a few days ago, but didnt get any responses...so I try it again
;-)
since we have upgraded our TSM server from 4.1.3 to 4.1.5 on OS/390 2.10 we get result
codes ? from the clients in some cases (clients are 4.1, 4.2 and 5.0). But i dont
know why this
Hi together,
since we have upgraded our TSM server from 4.1.3 to 4.1.5 on OS/390 2.10 we get result
codes ? from the clients in some cases (clients are 4.1, 4.2 and 5.0). But i dont
know why this happens?
Anybody know where this code come from and why it did not have a known number?
thanks in
Ronald,
you can download a demo version at http://www.tsmmanager.com and test it a few weeks.
theres also a good instruction and faq page available ;)
--
regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Joachim Stumpf
Datev eG
Nuremberg - Germany
Loket AMEV IP TSM Beheer Loket.AMEVI[EMAIL
Hi Farren,
2 weeks ago I had a pmr open at IBM about this problem.
This happens if the storagepool backuppool runs full during your clients backing up
and you have compressalways yes in your dsm.opt.
I opened the pmr at IBM because I was not sure if the file that the TSM tried to
backup was
:)
Stumpf, Joachim [EMAIL PROTECTED]@VM.MARIST.EDU on 02/04/2002
12:17:28
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Client Message - size estimate exceeded
having a networkproblem with speed less than 0,5Gb/hour?
//Henrik
|+-
|| Stumpf, |
|| Joachim |
|| joachim.stumpf|
|| @DATEV.DE |
|| Sent by: ADSM
a
database export and backup the exported copy.
//Henrik
|+-
|| Stumpf, |
|| Joachim |
|| joachim.stumpf|
|| @DATEV.DE |
|| Sent by: ADSM
Hi Christo,
we are running TSM-Server 4.1.5 on OS/390.
Im not very familiar with this OS/390- MVS- Stuff, but I can tell you that we have 10
TSM-Server running at 1 LPAR.
We named the tasks TADSM01-TADSM10.
The issue to do so was that we only wanted small databases.
Now our dbs are from 7GB -
--
regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Joachim Stumpf
Datev eG
Nuremberg - Germany
Hi together,
We have a database to backup with TSM. This db is 2GB and the backup takes 5 hours.
To backup the db the application which uses the db has to be down.
Is it possible to start the application during the db-backup?
--
regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Joachim Stumpf
Datev eG
of an address space?
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Stumpf, Joachim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: People running OS/390 TSM servers - maybe for the development
guys..
Hi Christo,
we are running TSM-Server 4.1.5
Hi,
we had the same problem in our WinNT (file-server Intel Pentium pro 2*200MHz)
environment,
but the problem was located in the LAN.
In the end the switches to our HOST (OS/390) were to slow for the traffic.
Since we use the OSA-channel to store to our TSM-Servers in OS/390, the aggregate
we got the same messages in our environment (TSM Server on OS/390)...
it would be nice if someone can shed some light into this ...
--
regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Joachim Stumpf
Datev eG
Nuremberg - Germany
Alexander Verkooyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Freitag, 1. März 2002, 12:16:01,
Hi,
we have a problem with one of our Linux Nodes.
the errorlog looks like:
13.02.2002 11:34:36 fioScanDirEntry(): Object '/home/t04520a/nsmail/.Entwürfe.summary'
contains unrecognized symbols for current locale, skipping...
13.02.2002 11:34:59 fioScanDirEntry(): Object
Hi together,
to unsubscribe write your message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and put your email in the head of the message!
this should look like:
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: unsubscribe ADSM-L
unsubscribe ADSM-L
--
regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Joachim Stumpf
Datev eG
this is from my opt-file in w2k (remove the * in front of the parameter):
**
* Pre-, Post-Commands
**
*preschedulecmd c:\programme\admin\preadsm.bat
*postschedulecmd
the TSM-client connects to your server if you start the ba-client.
So you need a dsm.opt with this values:
NodeName yournode
TCPServeraddress yourserverip/name
--
regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Joachim Stumpf
Datev eG
Keith Kwiatek [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dienstag, 12. Februar 2002,
Hi together,
we run TSM-server 4.1.3.0 on OS/390 R2.10.
Now we want to save our TSM-database with dss concurrent copy.
For this its neccesary that on start of the cc-job the
database is not in use (nothing should be changed in the db at this moment)
Usually we have to shut down the running
To unsubscribe write your message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and NOT to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
;-)
--
regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Joachim Stumpf
Datev eG
Joe Callahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mittwoch, 16. Januar 2002, 01:17:14, CET):
I readily admit that I am one of those unsubscribers. My
Hi together,
I didnt find something in the list-archive related to the new versions.
Is there a known problem with TSM-Client for Linux 4.2.1.0 and german
umlauts (äÄöÖüÜ,ß)?
We have TSM-Server 4.1.3.0 on OS/390 2.10.
The Linux version is SuSE 7.3.
If we do a backup we get this in the
I think it's true!
I tested the new client on a W2k machine and I got the same RC you described
below.
If one file fails (e.g. it's in use by another proccess), the schedule
returns with a result code of 4.
I hope Tivoli works on a fix for that.
We have some automatically checking for result
Greetings,
Has anybody experience with the TSM-Journal-Filesystem on NT4?
What about the incrthreshold-Parm in the opt-file?
I just read the following in the TSM for Windows Using the Backup-Archive Client
Manual:
When a Windows client deletes a file or directory with a long name,
it
Hi David,
we have one Test-Server running with 4.1.3.0 on OS/390 2.10 and we have no problems.
I think we will upgrade our other servers soon.
But is it right, that unicode enabled filesystem are not realized in 4.1?
I read something in TSM for Windows using the backup-archive client Version 4
Hi together,
does anybody have experience in reorganising a TSM Database on OS/390-Server (2.10)?
We have 8 DB-Volumes Model-2 and there is only 47% used by the database.
We would like to reduce the database.
As you can see its only possible to reduce up to 220MB.
Our Level is 3.7.4.0, but an
54 matches
Mail list logo