Hi Everyone! I am trying to do a test run for one of the tsm clients, NT
5.1.6.0, on a TSM server that is at 5.1.6.2 on os/390 2.10. We currently
have 3590B tapes in an STK Powderhorn 9310 silo and are using 9840B for HSM
on the mainframe. I wanted to see what type of improvements we might see
Hello all,
I am in a situation where I want to migrate a COPYPOOL to a
different DEVICE CLASS. (I would settle for a change to the high level
qualifier on the tape but that can not be done.)I asked TSM and they
said that I have to define a new COPYPOOL, associate it with the new
that I have to define
a new COPYPOOL, associate it with the new DEVICE CLASS and do BACKUP primary
pool to COPYPOOL until it has all been copied. I have 10 TB of data in the
COPYPOOL and I am running on z/OS. Which means I am usually busy during 1st
and half of 2nd shift. Either way it would
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BEST WAY to MIGRATE TO NEW DEVICE CLASS
= On Mon, 3 Jun 2002 08:21:26 -0400, MC Matt Cooper (2838)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I am in a situation where I want to migrate a COPYPOOL
, January 08, 2002 18:25
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New device
Do as Kelly suggests...
When we moved a server out of one 3494 with 3590 B1A drives into a different
3494 with 3590 E1A drives,
basically the same sort of action...
we just
set up the new library
set the next pool of all our diskpools
Hi *SM-ers!
I will receive a new library tomorrow. We will switch from a 3494 to a
Ultrium 3584.
I will have to migrate all my data to the new library, but I don't want to
create new storagepools (standard naming convention, listed in various
reference support manuals you know...).
My current
Eric,
I'd try to rename the existing storagepool to a temporary name (rename
stgpool).
Then you can create a new pool with the old name, so your documentation
remains up to date.
With two tapepools you'll have the advantage that you can adjust space
reclamation and migration settings (next
-4006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 6:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: New device
Hi *SM-ers!
I will receive a new library tomorrow. We will switch from
to blah_old
defined the old name storage pools again (you will use your new device
class name)
set the next pool of all our diskpools back to the proper storage pool name
and you're good to go...
we waited for a majority of the data to natrually expire out of the old
library, then set the next pool
