=readwri
ANR2208I Volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\16AA.BFS deleted from storage pool
ACTIVEPOOL-FILE.
ANR1341I Scratch volume S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\16AA.BFS has been deleted from
storage pool ACTIVEPOOL-FILE.
The volume was deleted, i'am see if i have another problem of space reclamation.
Regards
Hi everybody,
My problem
__
ANRD_1627081930 (ssrecons.c:784) Thread52: Byte count mismatch for object
0.206273217 source: 0.62939, target: 0.920075 (PROCESS: 327)
ANRD Thread52 issued message from: (PROCESS: 327)
ANR1092E Space reclamation is ended
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Space reclamation is ended for volume
Hi everybody,
My problem
__
ANRD_1627081930 (ssrecons.c:784) Thread52: Byte count mismatch for object
0.206273217 source: 0.62939, target: 0.920075 (PROCESS: 327) ANRD
Thread52 issued message from
.
In the console i see that
ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume
S:\TSM_FILE_DEVCLASS\16AA.BFS, storage pool ACTIVEPOOL-FILE (process number
1497).
ANR1044I Removable volume S
backup for that TDP client a.s.a.p.
Kind regards,
Eric van Loon
AF/KLM Storage Engineering
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
mik
Sent: donderdag 12 december 2013 9:54
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Space reclamation is ended
Hi Eric van Loon and thanks for the reply,
I have already try the audit volume and audit volume fix=yes and no error on th
file, i dont understand.
Regars, Mickael.
+--
|This was sent by bobpatrick808...@yahoo.fr via Backup
part de mik
Envoyé : jeudi 12 décembre 2013 11:10
À : ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Objet : [ADSM-L] Space reclamation is ended for volume
Hi Eric van Loon and thanks for the reply,
I have already try the audit volume and audit volume fix=yes and no error on th
file, i dont understand.
Regars, Mickael
Seeing these errors on replicated TSM server during reclaim process, both
servers have been upgraded recently to 6.3.3
ANR1162W Space reclamation skipping damaged file on volume
D:\WIN2K_PRIM2\0001A370.BFS: Node NEREUS, Type Backup, File space
\\nereus\d$file:///\\nereus\d$, File name
\STELLENT
.
The above APAR was created shortly after my PMR was closed.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tim
Brown
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 7:08 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] ANR1162W Space reclamation skipping damaged
] ANR1162W Space reclamation skipping damaged file
What if I decide I don't need the data on that tape anymore?
Regards,
Orin
Orin Rehorst
* e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
( Phone: (713)670-2443
7Fax: (713)670-2457
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] ANR1162W Space reclamation skipping damaged file
Get this problem. I ran audit volume VT0090 fix=yes, and that didn't
help.
10/12/2008 06:54:13 ANR1162W Space reclamation skipping damaged file
on volume VT0090: Node EXCHANGE1, Type Backup, File space
EXCHANGE1\First
: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 6:25 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: ANR1162W Space reclamation skipping damaged file
I had this issue come up a couple of times and when the Audit xx
fix=yes didn't help I did what Richard suggested Restore Volume. I also
did the preview first.
Regards
Tim
Get this problem. I ran audit volume VT0090 fix=yes, and that didn't
help.
10/12/2008 06:54:13 ANR1162W Space reclamation skipping damaged file
on volume VT0090: Node EXCHANGE1, Type Backup, File space
EXCHANGE1\First Storage Group, File name \data\\Public Folder Store
(EXCHANGE1)\ full
PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Orin Rehorst
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 9:13 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] ANR1162W Space reclamation skipping damaged file
Get this problem. I ran audit volume VT0090 fix=yes, and that didn't
help.
10/12/2008 06:54:13 ANR1162W Space
If Audit Volume fails, and it's a primary storage pool volume,
consider doing Restore Volume, first with a preview.
Richard Sims
Administrator
Ravenscroft School
7409 Falls of Neuse Rd.
Raleigh, NC 27615
Process Reclaim StgPool DRPOOL (33) status
TSM Process Number: 33
Started: 23-May-2007 18:09
Finished: 23-May-2007 18:09
Status: TSMSTATE_FAILURE
Messages Logged:
ANR0984I Process 33 for SPACE RECLAMATION started
It is an Exabyte 7 slot single tape drive if that helps out.
Barrett
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Sims
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 9:01 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] DRPOOL Space Reclamation Problems
On May 24, 2007, at 8:39 AM, Barrett Keziah wrote:
... The tape in question, A5 is an archtape and is
loaded in the tape library. ...
ANR1044I Removable volume A5 is required for space
reclamation.
...
A tape may be physically present in a library, but not in a way which
Lately I have been having problems with TSM running offiste space
reclamation. I have it scheduled to run reclamation on the offsite
storage pools in the evening, and it seems that every evening, I start
getting read errors as well as tape drive issues. This only occurs
after the schedule kicks
Hope this helps!
Aaron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2/7/2006 6:31:42 AM
Lately I have been having problems with TSM running offiste space
reclamation. I have it scheduled to run reclamation on the offsite
storage pools in the evening, and it seems that every evening, I start
getting read errors as well
I recently migrated our Windows 2K3 TSM server from 5.2.1.3 to 5.3.2.0
and since then, it seems that whenever I kick off space reclamation for
my primary tape storage pools, it eats up scratch tapes, instead of
freeing them up. Is there a reason for this? I understand that
occasionally TSM
Sounds like a collocation problem. Q stg / q node / q collocgroup.
Regards,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dennis Melburn W IT743
Sent: maandag 28 november 2005 15:22
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Space Reclamation Eating
: Space Reclamation Eating Tapes
I recently migrated our Windows 2K3 TSM server from 5.2.1.3 to 5.3.2.0
and since then, it seems that whenever I kick off space reclamation for
my primary tape storage pools, it eats up scratch tapes, instead of
freeing them up. Is there a reason for this? I understand
Things have changed in 5.3.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dennis Melburn W IT743
Sent: maandag 28 november 2005 15:35
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Space Reclamation Eating Tapes
Don't think that is it, I only have 2
Of
Bos, Karel
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 9:53 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Space Reclamation Eating Tapes
Things have changed in 5.3.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Dennis Melburn W IT743
Sent: maandag 28
then, it seems that whenever I kick off space reclamation for
my primary tape storage pools, it eats up scratch tapes, instead of
freeing them up. Is there a reason for this? I understand that
occasionally TSM will need a scratch tape to combine other tapes, but it
should then free those other tapes up
On Nov 28, 2005, at 11:42 AM, Sung Y Lee wrote:
It has been my experience that, if primary tape pool maxscratch
value is
set greater than tapes used when reclamation kicks off, it mounts a
brand
new scratch tapes. ...
I've never seen that behavior - that would result in a large number
of
I have been recieving Space Reclamation Failures on my TSM server lately
and I am not sure why. When I go back to the time of the events, I get
the following ANRD log report: (sorry for the length of the report,
but I figured it would be best to include it all)
11/20/2005 15:59:12
: Errors when running Space Reclamation
I have been recieving Space Reclamation Failures on my TSM server lately
and I am not sure why. When I go back to the time of the events, I get
the following ANRD log report: (sorry for the length of the report,
but I figured it would be best to include
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 11:13 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Errors when running Space Reclamation
When posting PLEASE INCLUDE YOUR
Hi all,
Since upgrade to TSM 5.3.1, I'm facing a strange problem affecting
reclamation on specific copypool dedicated to directories structure.
What happens is as follows :
09/15/05 09:34:28 ANR0984I Process 375 for SPACE RECLAMATION
started in the
BACKGROUND
with MOVE DATA instead of reclaim, and
it finished OK.
Have seen nothing else strange.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
PAC Brion Arnaud
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 9:10 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Space reclamation
: Friday, August 26, 2005 1:56 AM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Question about Space Reclamation..
I have been handed a TSM system in the past week that has been running for
a year. IT has collocation = yes for TAPEPOOL and COPYPOOLS. this
system
is running TSM 5.2.2.
We have run out of tapes
Of
Maurice van 't Loo
Sent: dinsdag 30 augustus 2005 11:05
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Question about Space Reclamation..
Hoi Roark,
If you cannot affort to upgrade to 5.3.x, you can also use more
tapepools.
So you can make a tapepool for very small nodes, with collocation off,
so it still
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Question about Space Reclamation..
Hi,
Just one thing to add. If the command line isn't your friend, tools like
tsmmanager can help you a lot. Just checkout the website (and look at
the pricing) and download the demo
: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 12:20 PM
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Question about Space Reclamation..
Hi,
Just one thing to add. If the command line isn't your friend, tools like
tsmmanager can help you a lot. Just checkout the website (and look at
the pricing) and download the demo.
Regards,
Karel
Colwell
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Prather, Wanda
Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 1:38 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Question about Space Reclamation..
There is a middle ground here.
If you set COLLOCATION
== On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:33:58 -0400, David E Ehresman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Uhh, how about for restore performance when it matters most, during a
disaster!
I come down on the other side of this, myself. Biggest reason is, you just
can't afford to collocate the offsites. Imagine
=NO stop the addition of volumes? (I expect
the answer is YES,, please correct me if I am wrong.)
Now to the second question.
I see no easy way to have Space Reclamation condense the volumes included
in the two pools as it will only process FULL volumes. (Again Please jump
in here
Why colloocate the offsite tapes?
Original message
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:26:44 +0200
From: Maibaum, Volker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Question about Space Reclamation..
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Hello,
one reason why I updated to version 5.3
Ludwig
Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 7:56 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Question about Space Reclamation..
I have been handed a TSM system in the past week that has been running
for
a year. IT has collocation = yes for TAPEPOOL and COPYPOOLS. this
system
is running TSM 5.2.2.
We have
Regarding COPYPOOL, I don't see any reason to collocate that at all.
Uhh, how about for restore performance when it matters most, during a disaster!
David
(with small percent utilization) as we add the nodes.
Question ..
Will this setting COLLOCATION=NO stop the addition of volumes? (I expect
the answer is YES,, please correct me if I am wrong.)
Now to the second question.
I see no easy way to have Space Reclamation condense the volumes included
0824645461
-Original Message-
From: Moses Show [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 5:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Space reclamation
Thank you
Mike Bantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
15/06/2004 16:40
Earlier on this morning we commenced a Space reclamation job but we being
given multiple messages referring to different volume numbers, of the
following type
ANR1163W Offsite volume SPL500L1 still contains files
which could not be moved.
However after struggling
]
Subject: Space reclamation
Earlier on this morning we commenced a Space reclamation job but we being
given multiple messages referring to different volume numbers, of the
following type
ANR1163W Offsite volume SPL500L1 still contains files
which could not be moved
Thank you
Mike Bantz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
15/06/2004 16:40
Please respond to
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: Space reclamation
Offsite volume SPL500L1 is the main clue here - some of your
Earlier on this morning we commenced a Space reclamation job but we being
given multiple messages referring to different volume numbers, of the
following type
ANR1163W Offsite volume SPL500L1 still contains files
which could not be moved.
However after struggling
: Mike Bantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: June 15, 2004 10:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Space reclamation
Offsite volume SPL500L1 is the main clue here - some of your offsite
tapes need reclamation, but for fairly obvious reasons that reclamation
can't happen right now.
Check in those
unfortunately it si not possible to run multiple reclamation streams on
a tape pool.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/29/04 7:45:06 AM
Can I run multiple reclaimation streams on a single tape pool
concurrently?
Where can I RTFM or find the syntax?
TIA ... JC
I received the following error:
ANR0986I Process 700 for SPACE RECLAMATION running in the
BACKGROUND processed 160232 items for a total of
79,052,641,621 bytes with a completion state of
FAILURE
at 19:48:48.
What happens
the reclamation process.
David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH 321.434.5536
Pager 321.634.8230
Fax:321.434.5509
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/12/04 09:29AM
I received the following error:
ANR0986I Process 700 for SPACE
]
02.01.2004 16:24
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: More mount points thru space reclamation
I found the problem my self! I had to increase the Maximum Scratch
Volumes Allowed from 100 that I had as a maximum
Hi TSM'ers,
here a sequence of what had happened with a
TSM-SERVER 5.1.8.1 on an IBM H70 under AIX 4.3.3-11
and 6 months old 3584-LTO2 library with 4 drives
1. SPACE RECLAMATION started as follows:
23.12.2003 03:16:14 ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume
373ABW, storage pool
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.de cc:
Sent by: ADSM: Subject: Space reclamation running
since 23Dec2003
Dist Stor
:53 ANR1163W Offsite volume CARNSWETSM2.BFS.070013489 still
contains files which could not be moved.
2004.01.02 08:25:53 ANR1082W Space reclamation terminated for volume
CARNSWETSM2.BFS.071830391 - insufficient number
...
ANR1082W Space reclamation terminated for volume CARNSWETSM2.BFS.071830391
- insufficient number of mount points available for removable media.
...
Larsa - See entry Drives, not all in library being used in
http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts
for the most common causes
on the destination server???
/Larsa
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 2 januari 2004 12:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More mount points thru space reclamation
...
ANR1082W Space reclamation terminated for volume CARNSWETSM2.BFS.071830391
Forgot the versions of the servers:
TSM1:
W2K SP4 and TSM version 5.1.7.0
TSM2:
W2K SP4 and TSM version 5.1.5.0
The way it works is between TSM2 to TSM1 with space reclamation.
/Larsa
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: den 2 januari 2004 12:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: More mount points thru space reclamation
...
ANR1082W Space reclamation terminated for volume CARNSWETSM2.BFS.071830391
- insufficient number of mount points available for removable media.
...
Larsa - See entry Drives, not all in library being used
: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08.10.2003 07:31
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:space reclamation on a server storage pool?
We have 2 systems. TSM1 and TSM2. TSM2 is used solely as an offsite system
to backup
John
Zlatko is right. Since only TSM1 knows what is on the virtual volume, only
TSM1 can perform reclamation of the virtual volume.
The TSM designers then had a design choice about how this is acomplished.
The obvious way is for reclamation of the virtual volume to be accomplished
by mounting
, and then again during the space reclamation of the server storage
pool. This seems like a great waste of time when the exact same data should
already be on the TSM2 system and could be moved directly from 1 tape to
another where it would be considerably faster.
Does this make sense? Why would
From: Chandrasekhar, C.R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For auto reclamation you must have minimum two tape drives in
your library.
This is only partially correct. You can set up automated reclamation for
one-drive libraries, but only for primary tape pools; see the relevant
admin's guide for
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Space reclamation
Hi,
I am quite new to TSM and trying to configure some setups by myself
currebntly facing some problems.
My setup is as follows:
I run a daily backup for around 200 GB on LTO tapes. I permanently have
. So I am using the expiry features and want to use reclamation
to recover the recalimable space so that my automated backups goes
continuosly on these 3 volumes.
My problem is that I am geeting the following messages :
ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume UATHOT01, storage pool
UAT_POOL
Hello all, I have a problem with reclaiming two tapes. This is the message I
get on the server console:
ANR0984I Process 2134 for SPACE RECLAMATION started in the BACKGROUND at
11:28:00.
ANR1040I Space reclamation started for volume 000975, storage pool NTWTAPE
(process number 2134).
ANR1044I
.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH 321.434.5536
Pager 321.634.8230
Fax:321.434.5509
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/09/03 11:39AM
Hello all, I have a problem with reclaiming two tapes. This is the message I
get on the server console:
ANR0984I Process 2134 for SPACE RECLAMATION started
this should solve your problem
regards
N.Suresh
-Original Message-
From: Remeta, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 5:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Space Reclamation problem
Hello all, I have a problem with reclaiming two tapes. This is the message I
get
Bingo! Thank you very much!!!
Mark
-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Space Reclamation problem
Do a query restore and see if any restartable restores are there.
If so
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
COM cc:
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Subject: Space Reclamation problem
Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/09/2003 11:39 AM
Comiskey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
19.02.2003 18:18
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Newbie question about Space Reclamation
Hi,
I'm only new to TSM and on a bit of a steep
some output from the console below...
q proc
Process Description Status
-
Space ReclamationOffsite Volume(s) (storage pool
BACKUP_COPY_POOL), Moved Files: 0, Moved Bytes
), the process starts and the output volume
is mounted OK however the server wait for the input (60K+ seconds). I've
pasted some output from the console below...
q proc
Process Description Status
-
Space ReclamationOffsite
|
|cc:
|
|Subject: RE: Newbie question about Space Reclamation
that the drive has discovered...
Dwight
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Comiskey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 11:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Newbie question about Space Reclamation
Dwight,
Thanks for the pointers...
I did a q vol 476afxl1 f=d
I did a q vol 476afxl1 f=d and access=Read/Write, the tape is in the
library and there are no requests outstanding and Mount Limit = Drives :-(
I'm chuckling a bit to myself, thinking of the old joke of how you discern
a software person: That person will indefinitely look at command display
From: Stephen Comiskey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
We have a scheduled job each Friday to reclaim our copy pool
tapes (update stg backup_copy_pool reclaim=75), the process
starts and the output volume is mounted OK however the server
wait for the input (60K+ seconds). I've pasted some
message --
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:35:40 -0600 (CST)
From: Alexander Lazarevich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: ADSM Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: space reclamation errors
I've got a big problem, I'm hoping someone can help me out.
We are using ADSM server v 3.1, on an AIX 4.3.3 machine. We
Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/11/02 05:44 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Space reclamation of offsite copy pool takes forever
Reclamation of our offsite copy pool is taking forever. Right now, we
have
200
, then 97, etc., but I don't see much improvement in overall freeing up
of tapes. It appears that most of the time is taken up with mounting input
volumes. Even though we have a 3494, I'd say 80% of the time is spent
waiting for tape mounts. Is there any way to get space reclamation to free
up
: Subject: Space reclamation of offsite
copy pool takes forever
Dist Stor
Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.EDU
11/11/2002 05:44
PM
Please respond
.
Technical Specialist
Naptheon Inc.
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Brazner, Bob [mailto:Bob.Brazner;JCI.COM]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 6:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Space reclamation of offsite copy pool takes forever
Reclamation of our offsite copy pool is taking
. Is there any way to get space reclamation to free
up offsite tapes faster? Note, for my onsite tape pool, I do not see this
problem (e.g., I can easily free up 30 tapes in 5 hours or less).
Bob Brazner
Johnson Controls, Inc.
(414) 524-2570
Hi All,
Running TSM V5.1.0 on Windows 2000 server SP2. Started running Space Reclamation
process on the Tape Volumes. The process runs for a while moves some data and then
just stops. Tried to cancel process, it remains pending but doesn't stop.
What could be possibly wrong ??
Any help
Hello all,
Does anyone have a script/SQL command to figure out how many tapes are below
the reclamation threshold? I'm sure there has to be something easy, but
every command I've tried hasn't worked.
Thanks,
Rob Hefty
IS Operations
Lab Safety Supply
reclaimed by space reclamation?
Hello all,
Does anyone have a script/SQL command to figure out how many tapes are below
the reclamation threshold? I'm sure there has to be something easy, but
every command I've tried hasn't worked.
Thanks,
Rob Hefty
IS Operations
Lab Safety Supply
As Paul says, this will depend as much on your data as on your hardware.
Using 3590E tape drives, yesterday we got rates of 1.6MB/s to 55.4MB/s
as reported by Servergraph/TSM on our 5 tape to tape storage pool
copies; the median was 27.4MB/s. The rates on our 8 tape storage pool
reclaims last
-
Von: Rob Hefty [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Mittwoch, 9. Oktober 2002 14:04
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: How many tapes reclaimed by space reclamation?
Hello all,
Does anyone have a script/SQL command to figure out how many tapes are
below
the reclamation threshold
Hello TSMers,
I've got a problem with my space reclamation for virtual volumes. We use
two TSM Servers Version 4.2.2.0 (OS Sun Solaris 2.7). They do
server-to-server communication. When space reclamation starts for the first
reclaimable virtual volume in a storage pool, everything looks fine
TO MOUNT TAPE.
LOCAL FIX:
Increase the commtimeout value on the source server.
Jeroen
-Original Message-
From: Sascha Braeuning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: space reclamation when using server-to-server communication
Hello
reclamation when using server-to-server communication
Hello TSMers,
I've got a problem with my space reclamation for virtual volumes. We use
two TSM Servers Version 4.2.2.0 (OS Sun Solaris 2.7). They do
server-to-server communication. When space reclamation starts for the first
reclaimable virtual
We are achieving 30GB/hour doing our tape-to-tape storage pool backup and
are happy with that rate. With this in mind, what do you feel would be an
acceptable rate for tape-to-tape space reclamation? I realize that every
hardware configuration is different and different shops have different
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 6:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Expected throughput rate for space reclamation
We are achieving 30GB/hour doing our tape-to-tape storage pool backup and
are happy with that rate. With this in mind, what do you feel would be an
acceptable rate
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Space reclamation runs, but tapes don't free up
There is a known problem opened with IBM on this... We were told to upgrade
to tsm 4.2.2.4 or higher...this seemed to clean up most but not all
: Subject: Space reclamation runs, but
tapes don't free up
Dist Stor
Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.EDU
10/01/02 08:13 PM
Please respond
]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Re: Space reclamation runs, but tapes don't free up
We are having a similar problem with our server (v4.2.2.12, on OS/390
v2.10).
Here is my problem:
The reclaim runs, and ends, but the tapes are not being updated as empty.
If I run an audit
be a reason why it would not return to scratch
Are all your problem tapes like that?
Michael Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/02/2002 01:34:26 PM
Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Re: Space reclamation
, 2002 8:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Space reclamation runs, but tapes don't free up
Michael,
Why has your tape got a status of filling ?
That would be a reason why it would not return to scratch
Are all your problem tapes like that?
Michael Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 10/02/2002 01
Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Michael Moore
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 9:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Space reclamation runs, but tapes don't free up
Yes..
I now have approximately 200 tapes in this status, and so far the only fix
is to audit each volume.
IBM
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
