Re: incrbydate option

2002-12-23 Thread Seay, Paul
, December 20, 2002 1:31 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: incrbydate option Thomas Denier wrote: The documentation for the incrbydate options states that it will back up new and changed files with a modification date later than the last incremental backup stored at the server

incrbydate option

2002-12-19 Thread Thomas Denier
is often as much as several minutes out of synchronization with the client clocks. How does this affect the behavior of the incrbydate option? I am getting extremely tired of spending time dealing with amgiguities, omissions, and outright errors in the TSM documentation.

Re: incrbydate option

2002-12-19 Thread John Naylor
the completion of the last incremental backup, but it would be nice for confirmation. Thomas Denier [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12/19/2002 04:19:40 PM Please respond to ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE) Subject: incrbydate option

Re: incrbydate option

2002-12-19 Thread Richard Sims
The documentation for the incrbydate options states that it will back up new and changed files with a modification date later than the last incremental backup stored at the server. This is somewhere between ambiguous and incoherent... I encourage everyone finding problems in the manuals to email

Re: incrbydate option

2002-12-19 Thread Mark D. Rodriguez
, the mainframe clock is often as much as several minutes out of synchronization with the client clocks. How does this affect the behavior of the incrbydate option? I am getting extremely tired of spending time dealing with amgiguities, omissions, and outright errors in the TSM documentation