MUSTAFA BAYTAR:
With db2adutl query I can find the images,and I also can restore the database
successly.But why I could not see it with admc -id=client -password=client backup *?
=== 2003-01-08 09:07:00
try db2adutl query full command at db2 promt?
if you can see timesamp
db2 backups are API backups and you coulnd not see them with admc -id=client
-password=client
backup * command
you can see them with db2adutl or db2 get db history commands
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 09:50:35 +
Farren Minns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all you TSMers out there.
I have been asked to backup a Mac OSX client and was wondering if any of
you have had any experience of this. I have never had anything to do with
Macs in the past and am not sure if there is
Hello,
I had the same problem.
The documentation of library sharing in the Administrator Guide is wrong!
These are the right steps:
- Define the server to server communication
- On the library M A N A G E R define the library with shared=yes, define
the drives and define the pathes from the
Hi all,
Here we are going to upgrade our TSM 4.2.1.9 server running on AIX, first we
are going to upgrade TSM 4.2.2.0 and then to TSM 4.2.3.0 same day, And I
would like to know any side effects or problems after upgradation.
I will appreciate your valuable information.
Regards,
Hi Mark,
I had a problem like this a few months back - waited about an
hour for the server to start up properly - got to exactly the
same place yours came - after I halted it a 2nd time it came up
relatively quickly - about 20 minutes - I think the fact that
you have an 11Gig recovery log volume
Might be very obvious have you altered the softlink to libobk.a ?
-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday 7 January 2003 21:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Oracle RMAN error
We have Oracle 8.1.7.4.0 (32 bit)on AIX 4.3.3 and TDPO 2.2.1.0.
TSM
The documentation of library sharing in the Administrator Guide is
wrong!
You didn't say if you sent feedback to the Publications folks so
that this can be corrected and save future customers some grief.
They need our experiential feedback to improve the content of the
documentation.
Hello All
Anyone can help me, please ?
ANRD smnode.c(19810): ThreadId25 Session exiting
has no affinityId cluster
AIX Version: 4.3.3
TSM Version: 5.1.5.4
I checked the actlog and I received the message below
when I turn on setcontextmessaging:
(30) Context report
(30) Thread
Also, ensure that there is a compatible devclass on the MANAGER to match
those on the calling client. It does not need to be the same devclass
name, but should be defined identically. Without this, the any request for
scratch tapes will fail.
Regards,
-=Dave=-
+44 (0) 20 7608 7140
(A)bort,
Not sure if this helps.
http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts
ANRD smnode.c(5323): Error validating inserts for event 14995.
Seen when using the TDP for MS SQL to view data stored on the server
by
a different level of that TDP. Backups made with TDP for MS SQL
If this is a Windows node, you might also investigate to see if there is
more than one physical machine using the same node name.
I'm seeing this where a customer had configured three physical machines
(with different versions of windows on each naturally) with the same node
name.
Lucky for us
There is an APAR for this Problem:
APAR= IC34020
DEFINE DRIVE AND DEFINE PATH COMMANDS NOT NEEDED WHEN SETTING
UP TSM LIBRARY CLIENT COMMUNICATIONS TO THE TSM LIBRARY MANAGER.
ERROR DESCRIPTION:
When setting up the TSM library client server, TSM Administrator
Guide v5.1 documentation currently
We have set up the manager and client per instructions. Manager mounts the
tape okay, however the client cannot access the tape drive and returns the
following error:
ANR8779E Unable to open drive 3590DRV1, error number=2. Any ideas
Ruth Peters, Dasd Storage Administrator
Watkins Motor
I have looked at MyODBC, and confess I do not yet understand all of it,
but it looks like it needs a driver for a database. Does it have a
TSM Database driver? I could not fine one. Thanks.
Andy Carlson|\ _,,,---,,_
Senior Technical Specialist
Thanks for all the responses. Problem has been resolved. As it turns out the
problem was that the drive names in the Tape Paths were inconsistent with
those that
were defined in AIX.
Ruth Peters, Dasd Storage Administrator
Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. --IT/HDQ
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(863) 688-6662
What do you mean, they are in the inport. The 3494 should put the tapes
away with a category of FF00 and then you just check them in. You should be
able to do a mtlib command to see their status.
I believe you are getting confused with the J on the tape. That is not part
of the serial number.
hi,
today, my 5.1.6.0 server crashed unexpectedly. have you every seen something
like that
on that version?
regards,
Burak Demircan
CEO / ITT
MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676)
fax :+90 212 481 11 54
Take a look in the device drive
possibly there is a problem in that !!!or the tape is
blocking the device...
hugs,
Jorge Martins
--- Ruth Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu:
We have set up the manager and client per
instructions. Manager mounts the
tape okay, however the client cannot
Hi Burak!
You need to send more information. But one idea who pop up in my head
Yes. We had a similar problem when the web admin gui touched the nodes
table (I registered a new node shortly after the upgrade that brought the
server down). Also seemed to happen when a select ran against the nodes
table.
Waiting for fix from Tivoli. Supposedly fixed in 5.1.6.1.
Regards,
today, my 5.1.6.0 server crashed unexpectedly. have you every
seen something
like that
on that version?
Burak,
IBM wanted me to upgrade to 5.1.6.0, overlooking this minor fault with the
release. Been bit by this problem 2 too many times so I asked everyone on
the list if they were using it
Hi
This problem is related to a bug in ver 5.1.6 which is to be solved with version 5.1.6.1, which Tivoli support has promised will be out soon.
The problem has todo with a change in the nodes table. Whenever you try to access the nodes table from the Web interface, your server will go down.
Hello Fellow TSMer's,
I have been trying to postpone upgrading my TSM Server for as long as
possible. I'm a firm believer in if it ain't broke, don't fix it!, but i'm
starting to get funny errors. Anyways, I'm at 4.1.2, and I have been reading
many issues with each 5.X release. I would like to
Hi
We have multiple sites running TSM ver 5.1.1.6, which this far has seem
stable.
We also have a few sites running TSM ver 5.1.5.4, which this far has seem
stable. With earlier version of 5.1.5 such as 5.1.5.1 and 5.1.5.3 there
has been report of problems, but we haven't noticed anything
You don't say what platform - if it's AIX, I can highly recommend 4.2.1.15.
We've been there about 10 months, works great.
I'm not budging from here until there is something more stable available.
My server is running at max capacity with 450 clients, and I can't afford
any of the problems with
Hi,
same here, 5 tsm servers running 4.2.1.15 (10 months), and one upgraded to
5.1.5.4 (15 days), all under AIX 4.3
regards
René LAMBELET
NESTEC SA
GLOBE - Global Business Excellence
Central Support Center
Is there a 32 bit TSM Client for AIX5.1 OS.?
Rajesh Oak
_
Get 25MB, POP3, Spam Filtering with LYCOS MAIL PLUS for $19.95/year.
http://login.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plusref=lmtplus
Recently, we have started to notice lots of problems with client
passwords, after reseting them via the web-admin interface.
This just started when we went to 4.2.3.x (had to install the .2 patch
level due to the problems with 4.2.3.0 and node names that contained such
strange, off-the wall
You can install the 32-bit version on AIX5.1 and it will work. I had
to do this recently because the 64-bit client would core dump about every
other day. i.e. it would get part way through the incremental and then
core-dump.
Since I downgraded to the 32-bit version it seems to be
hi,
i have space for both db and log. they are in %50 usage
sorry but i do not have too much clue
regards,
Burak Demircan
CEO / ITT
MERCEDES-BENZ TURK A.S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:+90 212 482 35 00 (4676)
fax :+90 212 481 11 54
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 11:16 -0500 1/8/03, Nelson Kane wrote:
I would like to know, from everyone's
experience, what version is the most stable thus far?
We asked IBM that question a few months ago. They promised to get us
an answer quickly. We never got one.
--
Matt Simpson -- OS/390 Support
219 McVey Hall
Does Objects compressed by mean , TSM compressed data by 75% ?
Total number of objects inspected: 13,974
Total number of objects archived:12,784
Total number of objects updated: 0
Total number of objects rebound: 0
Total number of objects deleted: 0
Total number
Yes. That's the TSM client compression figure.
David Longo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/08/03 02:17PM
Does Objects compressed by mean , TSM compressed data by 75% ?
Total number of objects inspected: 13,974
Total number of objects archived:12,784
Total number of objects updated: 0
That is exactly what it means.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant -ADSM/TSM
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
AIX, HACMP, Storage, TSM Consultant
Cell (831) 595-3962
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
Hi ,
The TSM data base says J1P303(nodename) is WinNT 5.00, TSM client Version 4, Release
2, Level 2.0, and J1P304(nodename) is WinNT 5.00, TSM client Version 4, Release 1,
Level 2.0.
ANS1228E: 01/07/2003 01:58:55 fsCheckAdd: unable to update filespace on server
I am running TSM version
All,
Does anybody know offhand the estimated number of cleanings an IBM LTO
cleaning cartridge supports before it should be disposed of? Thanks in
advance.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
Tivoli Certified Consultant -ADSM/TSM
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
AIX,
Hot Diggety! Joshua Bassi was rumored to have written:
Does anybody know offhand the estimated number of cleanings an IBM LTO
cleaning cartridge supports before it should be disposed of? Thanks in
advance.
Exactly 50. ;) It's got a built-in counter on the tape, and the IBM
libraries will
Hi ALL,
I have TSM server and client ver 5.1.5
The archives are very much slower than the selctive or incremental backups. Both are
backed up to tapes directly
Is there anything I can tune or modify at the server or client level to improve the
speed of archives?
Thanks and
Hi, TSMers'
My window 2000 server/TSM 5.1.5.0/Client 5.1.5.0 restarts, TSM server1
starts. But windows' service of client schedule
can not start automatically as supposed, (windows shows a message of one
service application does not start.)
it has to be started manually. Anybody met this
APAR IC34630 may describe your problem. This was supposed to be fixed in
5.1.5.4 (I have not tested yet.) - but 5.1.5.4 was pulled so wait for next
patch.
If this is your problem, you can set the Schedule Service to Restart the
Service on first failure (Services, your schedule service, recovery)
Recently, we have been experiencing a high number of media errors (generally read
errors with some locate errors) on our 3584 LTO library. A recent query of the
volumes table shows that we have 37 tapes (out of 250) with read errors! We have had
IBM out to inspect the library and drives, and
Thank you Tim. I thought the solution of Restart the service. Finally I
decided to use the schedule of NT to run my archive command.
Tao Jiang
Coban Research Technologies
www.cobantech.com
713-271-7888 ext. 207
- Original Message -
From: Rushforth, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
5.1.5.4 is still up at this time--might you mean 5.1.5.3?
I do hope you don't know of a problem with 5.1.5.4--I just downloaded it
this morning!
Kathleen
Rushforth, Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PEG.MB.CA
I had heard from a support call that 5.1.5.2 was the one to be at for
stability sake. Issues with 5.1.5.3 .4. I believe .6 is out now as well,
but not sure on it.
Steve Argersinger
Ruan Transportation
-Original Message-
From: Kathleen Hallahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
30 is the best guess I can find. Supposedly the drive updates the chip in
the cartridge and will not accept it to do a cleaning after 30. I found
some of the in IBM docs about setting up autoclean on my 3583 LTO library.
[Coats, Jack] [snip]
Does anybody know offhand the estimated
Hmm...and I heard 5.1.5.4 from another support person. Which in and of
itself is more telling--just what is ITSM communicating to their support
people on this?
5.1.6 is out, but judging by the comments of others on the list over the
past couple of days, I'm staying far away from it for the time
Peter,
I have a 3583 rather than a 3584, but over the last 1-1/4 years it's been
in service, the only time we've had a tape failure was when we had a
hardware failure - dead picker (four times), jammed drives (twice), etc.
We have 71 data tapes in our library and we've never seen one just fail.
Subfilecachesize could be raised; please submit a requirement and let us
know what types of cache sizes you need. The cache size is not bounded by
the 32-bit differencing image limit.
System objects and subfile processing would be very difficult. I would
suggest pushing a requirement for
Recently, we have been experiencing a high number of media errors
(generally read errors with some locate errors) on our 3584 LTO library.
Consider environmentals among the factors. Winter is particularly bad because
so much dirt is tracked into computer rooms on wet shoes. If the room is not
30 is the best guess I can find...
From my notes:
Ultrium cleaning cartridge The IBM LTO Ultrium Cleaning Cartridge
is valid for 50 uses only: the
cartridge's LTO-CM chip tracks the
thank you all for taking time to answer my question. I was leaning towards
4.2.x as well, there seems to be too many issues with 5.x.
-kane
OK, I need to re-phrase this after talking with my team. It wasn't a
support person, but rather the README from 5.1.5.2 that said to avoid
5.1.5.4 and 5.1.5.6. Regardless, I think your direction is appropriate.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Kathleen Hallahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Hello all,
I am faced with a situation where I need to delete all inactive files past a
certain date, but keep all inactive version prior to that same date. Is
there any way that this can be accomplished?
I have a TSM server V4.2.3 running on AIX 4.3.3.
Thanks,
Arthur
Update devclass ltoclass library=newlibraryname
TSM will expect to find volumes from this device class in the new library.
Kelly J. Lipp
STORServer, Inc.
485-B Elkton Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80907
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.storsol.com or www.storserver.com
(719)531-5926
Fax:
If it is the case, use tapeutil and get those particular tapes out from
library
Raghu
-Original Message-
From: Conko, Steven [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 9:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: move drmedia but tapes werent ejected
we're running tsm 4.2 on
Hi all£º
Today I tried to configure a TSM server¡£My lib is ADIC scalar 1000 and has two
driver£¨the elements are 1200£¬1201£¬I had already made the two drives as TSM
tape£¬devices name are /dev/mt0¡¢/dev/mt1£©£¬after I had defined my autolib£¬then I
tried to define the drives£¬everytime I
We have an end-user that accesses the TSM backup client command line on
our TSM INTEL clients (4.2.1.30) and runs the dsmc i command to start
maual backups on servers that failed scheduled backups the previous
night. He is the System Administrator on the INTEL boxes so we can't
prevent him from
58 matches
Mail list logo
