From: Richard Sims [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Mark - I wonder if that traditional distinction will prevail
in the near future. Network evolution has been accelerating,
largely driven by such storage needs, and so I think the
disparity between bus and wire will tend to lessen, and to
Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jozef Zatko
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Semote storage pool
Hi Etienne,
it is easy. I suppose you have a server with disk capacity, which you want
use for TSM to store data. I do not know
by: Subject: Re: Semote storage pool
ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager
cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: Semote storage pool
ADSM: Dist
I agree.. besides that's what off-site copy pools are for!
Mark
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:22:35AM -0600, Stapleton, Mark wrote:
Why would you want to do this? Disk (particularly local
disk) is cheap
these days. The lag resultant from Windows drive mappings or
(shudder!) NFS mounts will greatly
It doesn't matter how you use it. Forcing TSM to work its I/O at network
speeds when it is designed to work at bus speeds will show badly. You'll
be disappointed.
Mark - I wonder if that traditional distinction will prevail in the near
future. Network evolution has been accelerating,
Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to have a storage pool on a remote
machine without installing TSM on it. Typically, what I wan't to do is to
use space on a remote server to have a disk or a file storage pool on it. I
tried with a file device class and it allows only local disks. A
:
Sent by: ADSM:Subject: Semote storage pool
Dist Stor Manager
Ing. Jozef Zatko,
Can you share the steps to achieve this remote storage pool.
Thanks,
chandrasekhar
-Original Message-
From: Jozef Zatko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 3:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Semote storage pool
Hi Etienne,
you can
]
CHARAKOC@TIMcc:
KEN.COM Subject: Re: Semote storage pool
Sent
From: GUILLAUMONT Etienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I would like to know if it is possible to have a storage pool
on a remote machine without installing TSM on it. Typically,
what I wan't to do is to use space on a remote server to have
a disk or a file storage pool on it. I tried with a
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:22:35AM -0600, Stapleton, Mark wrote:
Why would you want to do this? Disk (particularly local disk) is cheap
these days. The lag resultant from Windows drive mappings or (shudder!)
NFS mounts will greatly slow your throughput.
Offsite storage?
--
Best Regards
Emil
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:22:35AM -0600, Stapleton, Mark wrote:
Why would you want to do this? Disk (particularly local
disk) is cheap
these days. The lag resultant from Windows drive mappings or
(shudder!) NFS mounts will greatly slow your throughput.
From: Emil S. Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 04:46:05PM -0500, Remeta, Mark wrote:
It doesn't matter how you use it. Forcing TSM to work its I/O at network
speeds when it is designed to work at bus speeds will show badly. You'll
be disappointed.
I agree.. besides that's what off-site copy pools are for!
I have a
]
stapleto@BERcc:
BEE.COM Subject: Re: Semote storage pool
15 matches
Mail list logo
